Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Mini-fall off test carried out with 1. Carried out SRT with Clay treated water
Clay treated water at GNSGA: Obsvd Surface Pr.: 9124 psi@ 9 bpm
PI - 3744-56 M @ 24 spm ISIP: 6989 psi
Fluid volume pumped: 50 bbls
At 1900 hrs:
THP: 6175 psi Pressure decline monitoring post callibration
CHP: 2500 psi injection in progress.
Benefits of Mini Frac Test
2. Determine critical injection pressure of the cap rock for flooding and
disposal projects.
9. Flow Regimes
In-Situ Stress Field
Deep wells: vertical fractures Shallow wells (depth < 1000 ft)
Horizontal fractures
How To Determine Stress Direction?
h: fluid efficiency
Normal Leakoff
Frac (Fluid) Efficiency (h)
Any straight line fit through the G-function derivative intersects the y-
axis above the origin.
Fracture Tip Extension with Flowback
Flowback is necessary. it
is recommended the
flowback rate is
approximately 1/6 to ¼
of the last injection rate.
Fracture Height Recession (FHR)
Fracture Height Recession (FHR)
1. G-Function Plot
The more complex the formation, the more natural fractures may exist
and the higher is the Net Fracture Pressure.
Net Fracture Pressure (Progress of Fracture Extension)
Net Fracture Pressure (Progress of Fracture Extension)
2 −1 𝑡 𝑐
𝐹 𝐿 = 𝑠𝑖𝑛
𝜋 √𝑡
Radial Flow Analysis (Similar to Horner Plot)
where x 1.6
Permeability Estimation from G-Function
Test Duration:
The lower the injection pressure, the shorter the fall-off period to reach
radial flow.
The shorter the injection period, the shorter the fall-off period.
Injection Period, minute Permeability, md Time to Pc, hour
5 0.1 0.2 (12 mins)
20 0.1 1.0
5 0.01 2–3
5 0.0001 10
Eaton’s Formula:
Smooth data
during radial
flow
Mini Frac Test - Case Study – Duvernay Formation
Injection pressures are too high; injection period is a little too long 25mins
Mini Frac Test - Case Study – Duvernay Formation
Low DPdrawdown.
High DPdrawdown.