0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
33 vues10 pages
This case study outlines two model United Nations debates focused on theories of international relations, with the first team debating the division of the Arctic region between countries and the second debating the ongoing Syrian civil war. Guidelines are provided for each debate, including country assignments, reference materials, procedures, and evaluation criteria for students participating in the simulated negotiations.
This case study outlines two model United Nations debates focused on theories of international relations, with the first team debating the division of the Arctic region between countries and the second debating the ongoing Syrian civil war. Guidelines are provided for each debate, including country assignments, reference materials, procedures, and evaluation criteria for students participating in the simulated negotiations.
This case study outlines two model United Nations debates focused on theories of international relations, with the first team debating the division of the Arctic region between countries and the second debating the ongoing Syrian civil war. Guidelines are provided for each debate, including country assignments, reference materials, procedures, and evaluation criteria for students participating in the simulated negotiations.
International Relations Goals • Familiarized with MUN Procedure
• Delegates / Actors
• Position Paper
• Understand the Theories
of International Relations Debate • 2 teams (2 days of debate) • Each student will represent a country / actor • Brief Position Paper • Debate under Moderated Caucus • Brief Resolution and voting • Observers will determine Theory of IR Team 1: Division of the Arctic Region Roberto (USA) Luz (Canada) Bernardo (Russia) Paola(Norway) Gianfranco (Denmark) Javier (Iceland) Jimena (Finland) Anacristina (Sweden) Santiago (Ukraine) References: Division of the Arctic Region • “It’s time to draw borders on the Arctic Ocean” (Video) https://youtu.be/Wx_2SVm9Jgo • The Economist - “Frozen Conflict” https://www.economist.com/international/2014/12/17/frozen -conflict • BBC News - “Arctic Map shows dispute hotspots” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/staging_site/in_depth/the_green_r oom/7543837.stm • The New York Times - “Hot Times in the Arctic” https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/opinion/temperature- climate-students.html • Investigate the countries’ territorial claims. Team 2: Syrian Civil War Rodrigo (Bashar Al- Assad/Syria) Luis (Trump/USA) Omar (Putin/Russia) Oscar (Iran) Charly (Turkey) Valeria (Saudi Arabia) Itzel (Democratic Federation of Northern Syria/Kurds) Hugo (Israel)
André (YPG/ Kurds)
Hania (ISIS) Sharon (Free Syrian Army) References: Syrian Civil War • VOX - “Syria’s war: Who is fighting and why” https://youtu.be/JFpanWNgfQY
• BBC News - “Syria: Seven years war explained”
https://youtu.be/CoL0L_DbuQQ
• The Guardian - “The war in Syria explained in five
minutes” https://youtu.be/K5H5w3_QTG0
• VOX - “How Syria’s Kurds are trying to create a
democracy” https://youtu.be/gaKwjvxukvg
• Investigate the actors' positions and interests
Debates:
Thursday 16th: Team 1
Friday 17th: Team 2 Evaluated Description Points Points criteria Availabl Awarde e d Position Arguments are organized in a logical 25 Paper sequence and based on a main idea (1 page long, Arial 12) APA Information of the sources is quoted in APA 5 Style Debate and Arguments and replies are precise, relevant 40 understandi and strong. ng of the topic Use of facts Each argument is based on relevant events, 10 statistics, reliable sources, examples, etc. Presentation The delegate maintains visual contact, uses 10 correct language, participates and proposes solutions. Respect The delegates show respect towards other 10 delegates, waits for their turn to talk and behaves diplomatically. TOTAL GRADE 100 Basic Procedure • Speaker’s list: some read Position Paper in 1 minute