Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Part I-Intakes
Contents of part I
2
Intakes
5
In high-head structures the intake can be either
an integral part of a dam or separate; for
example, in the form of a tower with entry ports
at various levels which may aid flow regulation
when there is a wide range of fluctuations of
reservoir water level.
Such a provision of multi-level entry also permits
the withdrawal of water of a desired quality.
6
Classification of intakes
Intakes are conveniently classified in to the
following types depending on the power
plant type and its layout.
i. Run - of - river intakes
ii. Canal intakes
iii. Dam intakes
iv. Tower intakes
v. Shaft intakes
vi. Intakes of special type
7
Run - of - river intakes
The components are:
Bell mouth entrance guarded by R.C or steel
grid forming the trash rack structure;
Control gate situated immediately d/s of the
bell mouth entry;
Upstream of the gate may be provided with
stop-log groves for provision of access to the
gate for repair;
Special de-silting arrangement may be
provided in silty rivers.
8
9
Canal Intakes
Like run-of-river intakes, these are also low head
intakes.
In this case, however, instead of leading water
directly to the turbines, the intake admits water
into the diversion canals.
11
Canal intakes cont’d
17
A natural scour hole forms at the outer bank
with its deepest point approximately twice the
river width downstream of the intersection of
the upstream axis with the bank
An off-take at 900 to the main flow is the least
desirable one
The structure should be aligned to produce a
suitable curvature of flow into the intake, and a
diversion angle of around 300 – 450 is usually
recommended to produce this effect.
18
In addition, an artificial bend, a groyne island or guide
vanes may be designed to cause the required curvature of
flow.
21
Dam intakes
22
Cage-shaped intakes resting against the face of the dam
and support on slab cantilevered from the dam provide
larger area of entry than the penstock intake area, thus
reducing entrance losses.
23
Tower Intakes
The tower intakes are normally on hillsides, not
far off from the dam, when it is not convenient
to provide the simple intake directly on the
upstream face of the dam.
In multipurpose reservoirs built for irrigation,
drinking water abstraction, flood regulation, etc.,
the water can be withdrawn through towers with
multiple level ports, permitting selective
withdrawal from the reservoirs vertical strata.
24
Tower intake cont’d
25
Tower Intake
26
Shaft Intakes
27
Shaft intake cont’d.
The intake gate (cylindrical) and sometimes a
stop-log closure.
28
Trash racks and Skimmers
• Debris carried in the incoming water can have
adverse impacts on a hydropower scheme in
that:
It can obstruct flow along the conveyance
structures, interrupting power generation or
causing the water to overflow and possibly
undermine the structures;
It can cause rapid deterioration of the penstock
or turbine or cause a catastrophic failure, such
as rupture of the penstock through a sudden
blockage of flow through the nozzle (in the case
of reaction turbines).
29
Cont’d.
30
Trash racks
31
Trash racks
32
Trash racks
33
Trash racks
34
Trash racks
A trash rack intercepts the entire flow and
removes any large debris, whether it is floating,
suspended, or swept along the bottom.
Frequently, it is located in the intake structure to
prevent debris from entering the water
conveyance system.
It can also be placed just before the inlet to the
penstock to remove smaller debris as well as
other trashes which may have entered the water
conveyance system downstream of the intake.
35
Trash racks cont’d.
36
Trash rack bar spacing
Approach Velocity
The approach velocity of flow should be kept
within such limits that it will not cause damage
to the rack structure.
A design approach velocity of 0.5 m/s is usually
used.
38
Approach velocity…
40
Allowing for partial clogging, racks are
generally designed to withstand a head
ranging from 1 to 2 m under normal
conditions and from 4 to 5 m under
exceptional circumstances.
41
Skimmer Walls
A skimmer wall is an obstruction placed at the
water surface, usually at an angle to the stream
flow which skims floating debris from the
passing water.
If the water level changes markedly as, for
example, at the intake of stream, the skimmer
can be a floating piece of timber secured at both
ends.
If changes in water level are small, a fixed
skimmer, a trash rack is still necessary.
42
Skimmer walls…
43
44
Losses in Intakes
45
a) Entrance Losses
The
entrance loss due to a change in direction of
flow (intake at an angle α with the main stream)
is given by;
Where,
• V is velocity in the diversion canal
• Vf is velocity of flow in the main river
• C is a constant which depends on the off-take angle of the
diversion canal
47
According to Massonyi, C is equal to 0.8 for
300 off-take angles and 0.4 for 900 off-take
angles.
𝟐
𝐕
𝟐
𝐕 𝐟
∆ 𝐡 𝐞= −𝐂
𝟐𝐠 𝟐𝐠
48
Loss due to sudden contraction of the
area at the inlet section.
This
given by:
Where,
K is a constant, which depends on the shape of
the entry;
K = 0.03 for bell-mouthed entry;
K = 1.3 for sharp cornered entry
49
Rack Losses
There
are numerous expressions available for
predicting head loss across trash racks.
One such expression (Kirschmer’s formula) (with
flow parallel to rack bars), is:
Where,
• Kt is trash rack loss coefficient (a function of bar shape),
• t is bar thickness,
• b is spacing between bars,
• Va is approach velocity, and
50
Rack losses cont’d.
If
the grill is not perpendicular but makes an
angle with the water flow ( will have a
maximum value of 900 for a grill located in the
sidewall of a canal), there will be an extra head
loss, given by the equation.
51
52
Gate Losses
Head
loss due to gates (at part gate opening) is
given by:
Where,
• Q is flow in the canal or conduit,
• A is area of gate opening, and
• Cd is discharge coefficient which varies between 0.62 and
0.83
53
Velocity through trash racks
Velocity
should be sufficiently low to avoid high
head loss and should be sufficiently high to
avoid large intake and trash rack cross section.
• The following are suggested limiting entrance
velocities:
1. Justin and Creager formula
54
2. Masonyi’s formula: to eliminate eddies and
vortices
55
Air entrainment and vortex formation at
intakes
57
Cont’d.
58
Cont’d.
59
60
Disadvantages of vortices
It
is therefore important that flows upstream of
the inlet area be as straight and uniform as
possible.
For the condition of no vortices at intakes, the
following empirical relations may be used:
63
Cont’d.
Where,
Ys is necessary submergence depth
V is velocity of flow into the conduit
D is diameter of the conduit
66
Size
of the air vent: There are several
recommendations:
67
2. Fourth Congress on Large Dams
Guideline (ICOLD)
Area of Air Vent = 10% control gate area
68