Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Pamela Tempone
Supervision: Martin Landrø & Erling Fjær
Problem Statement
Vertical Displacement [m]
Production
Compaction
Depth [Km]
Reservoir + Δσ, Δε
Surrounding
Compacting
reservoir
Changes in
rock properties
Reservoir + ΔVp, Δ Vs, Δρ
Surrounding
Time-shift in
4D seismic survey
Distance [m]
4D Time-shift Prediction Method
ΔP
1. Geomechanical Geomechanical
modeling modeling
σ,ε
∙ Geertsma’s analytical model
Rock-physical
2. Rock-physical modeling modeling
• Extension to
Geertsma’s analytical
solution
Shearwater field
(Staples et al, 2007)
Method
• Analytical solution:
superposition of 3 linear
systems;
• Model assumption:
– Zero stress at free surface;
– Zero displacement at z=K;
– Linear elastic medium;
– Homogeneous medium;
– Uniform deformation
properties;
Displacement due to a Nucleus
Underburden
1 ui u j
ij
2 x j xi Reservoir
• Zero-offset TWT-shift is
computed as follows:
n
zi
TWT 1 R zi
1 V pi
Time-shifts Synthetic
System 1+2 – Resultant system 1+2+3 –
Geertsma’s model Geertsma + Hard Rock Layer
• Extension to
Geertsma’s solution
(Blu)
Time-shift
Discussions
• Linear elastic medium
• Homogeneous medium Geomechanics
• Uniform deformation properties
• Horizontal layer
• Horizontal displacement
Rock physics
• R factor has limitations
Geertsma’s solution does not capture the strain field due to the stiff
layer in the underburden.
PETROMAX