Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Management
Introduction
1
IHRM ?
changing characteristics of HR in an
international context
planning, recruiting and selecting
developing and rewarding
evaluating performance and dismissing
2
Terms
HRM NAFTA
IHRM UNCTAD
HCN
PCN
TCN
MNE
culture shock expatriate
emi-etic distinction
inpatriate
Interrelationships between Approaches to the Field
4
Multinational Enterprise (MNE)
5
Defining HRM
7
Defining IHRM
8
Introduction to International Human
Resource Management
How the world is changing,
Importance of globalization,
IHRM as a key factor in the success of
international business.
An overview of domestic HRM and
discussion on what is different in IHRM.
Three Approaches to IHRM
Cross-cultural management
◦ Examine human behavior within organizations
from an international perspective
Comparative HRM and Industrial Relations
◦ Seeks to describe, compare and analyze HRM
systems and IR in different countries
HRM in multinational firms
◦ Explore how HRM is practiced in
multinationals
11
International Assignments Create Expatriates (Figure
1.3)
12
Defining Inpatriate
13
Differences Between Domestic HRM and
IHRM
14
More HR Activities
International
taxation
relocation and orientation
expatriate administrative services
host government relations
language translation services
15
More Involvement in Employee’s
Personal Lives
Ensure expatriates understand
housing arrangements
healthcare
compensation (cost-of-living allowances,
premiums, taxes)
visa requirements
schooling
16
Variables that Moderate Differences Between
Domestic and IHRM
17
The Cultural Environment
Defining culture
18
Forces for Change
Global competition
Growth in mergers, acquisitions and
alliance
Organization restructuring
Advances in technology and
telecommunication
Culture, communication
Sweden Germanic
Arab
Far Eastern
Anglo
Latin Latin
American European
Kluckhonn – Strodthbeck
This theory is based on the ‘patterns of behavior and
thinking’ in different cultures. The researchers distinguish
and compare cultures based on dimensions are:
S.No. Orientation of People Pattern of Behavior or
Thinking
1 What is the nature of people? Good, evil or mixed
2 What is a person’s relationship to Dominant, harmony, or
nature? subjugation
3 What is a person’s relationship to Hierarchical, collectivist,
other individualistic or others?
4 What is the modality of human Doing, being or
activity? containing
5 What is the temporal focus of human Future, present or past
activity?
6 What is the conception of space Private, public or mixed
What is the nature of people? This question explores the
assumptions of people in different cultures about human nature,
which could be good or evil, or mixed.
The second orientation is about relationship to nature, which
relates to locus of control – whether it is internal or external.
Americans with an orientation for being ‘dominant’ (locus of
control - Internal), believe that man can control nature and
spend huge amount on space research, weather control and
biotech and so on. In such dominant countries, conflict is not
disapproved of and differences in views are encouraged.
Organizational change is easier to implement.
The eastern countries, with an orientation toward harmony
believe that there should be a peace between man and nature.
Countries in the middle east and India, with an orientation for
subjugation, believe that destiny and God, control every thing.
People believe in astrology and assign all success and failure to
God. People generally resist change.
The Third Orientation – a person’s relationship to others – is about
the importance of hierarchy or respect for seniority on the basis of Age,
gender, familial or official position. In countries like Thailand, China
and Indonesia, there is more follower – ship than leadership.
Organization structures are taller and communication is more top-down.
In countries with an orientation towards ‘collectivism’, the needs of the
group are uppermost and people are strive towards consensus. In
‘individualist’ countries like the US, people strive towards individual
excellence and this is valued by society.
The fourth orientation - is modality of human activity – when it is
towards ‘doing’ self identification is achieved through action and
performance. Companies spend a great deal on research and
development. One’s achievement should be visible and measureable to
be recognized by society.
Where the orientation is towards ‘being’ people are more philosophical
and spend time in abstract thinking. Status in life is derived from birth,
age gender, family, and social connections more than though one’s
achievement. In such culture feeling are more valued than logic.
Where the orientation is towards ‘containing’, focus is on self –
control. Striving is for balance between feelings and doing.
The fifth orientation - is the temporal focus of human activity . -
when it is ‘future’ oriented as in the case of the US, the belief is that a
better future can be planned and controlled. Past performance is less
important ; there is greater focus on career planning and training.
Change is valued. On the other hand, if the orientation is towards the
‘past’ like in India, Pakistan, and the middle east, people base their
decisions on lessons learned from past.
The sixth orientation – concept of space in the minds of people –
how much people value privacy. If people think space is ‘public’ then
a notice that a meeting is in progress is interpreted as a request to stay
out. In countries like China, space is more ’public’ when the doors are
closed. People suspect something fishy. They will generally walk in
without knocking. In the western countries, on the other hand, space
is more ‘private’. People like their own chambers and always knock
before entering other’s room.
Hall’s Theory of Cultural Context: