Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Fouling.
The majority of condensers probably operate with cooling tower water. Treatment of cooling tower water depends on the actual water quality, the air quality, and some-times varies with the season and is normally best done by a specialized company, with experience of the particular conditions at the site.
The only special consideration is that a PHE is sensitive to fibre like particles, such as grass, seaweed, and leaves. Agglomerations of micro organisms, which can be found in cooling tower water, can also cause problems. A good screening with a mesh size about half the channel height is usually sufficient.
3 Do not mistake fouling for corrosion. The figure shows a plate with hard, rust like deposits. It was initially thought that it was corroded, but the plate was made of titanium, which simply does not corrode in the brackish water used. Moreover, corrosion of titanium does not produce insoluble, rust like deposits. A closer investigation showed that the deposits originated from the connecting, steel pipe work.
Pure vapour
Heat load
100
The inert gases affect the temperature difference, the heat transfer coefficient and the condensing efficiency.
0.1 bar), the temperature has decreased to 40 C and 193 kg R22 remains at the exit.
<=
2. The pressure continues to increase until the com-pressor HP cut-out. 3. Discharge pressure > condenser pressure. 4. The condensate exit temperature is much colder than the pure vapour saturation temperature. 5. A sight glass at the exit shows both a vapour and a liquid phase.
For small amounts, normally not. For larger amounts yes, but it takes time ( minutes) until enough con--densate (air) has collected. No Yes. <= Yes. See also 6. D.
Yes * *
The presence of vapour/ liquid surface at the exit is no sure sign of air, it could simply be that the condenser is well drained and thus there is no large liquid level at the bottom. No, not typical.
No, condensates moves up into the surface but it could also be a small vapour bulk, which cannot escape. <=
Yes * *
<=
6. An unequal tem-perature distribution along the plate pack. (Possibly more marked on the water side) (Use of a thermal camera) 7. Even temperature along the plate pack (refrigerant side) but a clear difference between top and bottom.
Yes. If many blocked channels, the water temperature will not increase here.
No
**
If a vapour with a large superheat, the top part could be different from the bottom. This is valid for a correct PHE as well. <=
8. The discharge manometer Yes No <= <= needle vibrates, 3.3. Especially useful for halo-carbons * Anywhere between the compressor and the expansion valve. ** A restriction can cause a condensate back-up, which then can have various effects, see column B. *** Either because of incorrect physical properties, design errors, an incorrect duty specification, too high water temperature, etc.
Gas/vapour should emerge if well drained. <= Yes, If uneven fouling over the channel width
<=
Yes, if water chan-nels close to either frame plate are blocked. See 6D Yes, If several blocked channels. No
No
No Yes, especially if the con-denser is a brazed PHE with a distributor (normally used as an evaporator). Yes No, normally not
<= Yes, but a conden-sate level is the re-sult, not the cause. <= See fig. 7 A -C.
Yes Yes.
14. Water exit temp. too low. Note: Check flow rate. 15. Condensate blocking part of the surface (This can be both a cause and a result) 17. Vapour emerges uncondensed.
<= Blocked channels create an internal EQ line on the vapour side, Fig. 7. Yes, but initially should be OK
<= No
Yes
No
* ** ***
Anywhere between the compressor and the expansion valve. A restriction can cause a condensate back-up, which then can have various effects, see column B. Either because of incorrect physical properties, design errors, an incorrect duty specification, too high water temperature, etc.
Detection of noncondensables.
See the troubleshooting matrix in slides 6 & 7 and figures in slides 10 and 26 - 28. It can be very difficult to distinguish if it is air or condensate, which is blocking the surface. A thermal camera is a good help but the pictures might be inconclusive. An undampened, i.e. not filled with liquid, pressure gauge, type Bourdon, shows the small, rapid pressure variations, which arise when a vapour containing air is compressed. The needle vibrates, to the point that it can hardly be seen. Compressing a pure vapour is a stable process, thus there are no needle vibrations. It obviously means that the compressor exhibits these pressure variations but piston, screw and scroll compressors do. It is thus a good indicator on the presence of air. Venting can be used see the slides below how to install a vent but it is a negative test: If the venting is done for a long enough time and there is no improvement of the performance, there was obviously no air present. Unfortunately, a lot of refrigerant has then escaped. Ammonia is a special case. Ammonia is extremely soluble in water. If the vent is connected to a hose and the exit from the hose is the dipped into a bucket filled with reasonably cold water only air will emerge at the surface, it bubbles. Pure ammonia whether liquid or vapour dissolves in the water. There are no bubbles, only some noise and movements on the surface. See the case study in slide 26 - 28.
Venting.
Ammonia. Ammonia is easy to vent, see slides 10 and 26 - 28. Vent always into water to avoid the ammonia smell. Halocarbons are expensive and usually forbidden to vent to the air, thus especially recovery units are used. It also a danger if venting into a confined space, where the vapours could collect in a low space and cause suffocation. Hydrocarbons can be vented to the air, but collect in low places where they can ignite or cause suffocation. Carbon dioxide also collects in low places and can cause suffocation. It can be vented to the air but the vent should not be connected to a downstream pipe as highpressure carbon dioxide will solidify when the pressure suddenly decreases below 5.2 bar. This is an especially important consideration for emergency valves.
Venting position.
A.PHE, all types.
For all vapours, vent from: A bottom port (the one opposite the condensate exit) A liquid receiver The pipe work Do not vent from an upper port only.
10
The basic principle is that the vent should be placed at the end of the condensation, i.e. close to the water inlet or maybe vice versa. In case of a plate heat exchanger that is easy, the vapour inlet is one of the upper port and the water inlet the other side, lower port. The venting shall thus be done from the bottom port. As the condensate leaves a bottom port as well, the venting is thus done from the opposite port or after the condenser. A S&THE is more complicated. Vents are practically always placed on top of the shell. However sometimes the vent should be close to the bottom.
11
Pinch point.
Desuperheater section
Condenser section
Desuperheater section
Condenser section
Note that there is pinch point, where the temperature difference approaches zero. The cooling media cannot pass this point and cooling of the water to a high temperature is not possible. Use two separate heat exchangers.
In the desuperheater, tap water is heated to a temperature approaching the inlet temperature, albeit with a lower capacity corresponding to the superheat load. In the condenser, the condensing heat is dumped into a suitable heat sink
12
13
3. The subcooler can sometimes be operated with a considerably colder cooling medium than the condenser, e.g. well water especially in case of an air cooled condenser. The colder the condensing temperature is, the better the evaporator capacity and COP will be.
Some considerations.
14
The condenser is connected to the liquid receiver via large condensate pipe. This pipe is not filled of condensate. Vapour can flow in counter current to the condensate.
Some considerations.
15
The condenser is connected to the liquid receiver via large condensate pipe. This pipe is not filled of condensate. Vapour can flow in counter current to the condensate.
Some considerations.
16
An oil cooler can be attached to a surge liquid receiver. The vapour recondenses via the EQ line Vent not possible
Vent
h)
Condensate level
To overcome the pressure drop in the condenser a liquid column is created in the condensate pipe.
Some considerations.
17
Vent
The condensate enters in to the bottom of the LR below the refrigerant surface.
18
19
20
21
22
Surge LR
A flooded condenser.
23
Surge LR
A flooded condenser.
24
S&T condenser
S&T condenser
SWPHE condenser
Low (P
Low (P
High (P
Flooding
A flooded condenser.
25
S&T condenser
S&T condenser
SWPHE condenser
Low (P
Low (P
High (P
h
A flooded condenser.
26
21.0 C
21.0 C
Compressor HP cutout
27
21.0 C
21.0 C
Compressor HP cutout
28
29.0 C
21.0 C
Compressor HP cutout
29
Expansion valve The capacity of the condenser oscillated between 75 % and about 100 % with a period of about 15 min SWPHE condenser
An investigation showed that the vertical feed to the expansion valve was almost 10 metres and a about 100 mm in diameter.
Liquid receiver
30
Expansion valve
When the expansion valve closed, the liquid column in the pipe could not be maintained. The liquid then eneterd the LR and the condenser.
SWPHE condenser
Liquid receiver
31
Surge drum
The surge drum was lowered. This had the extra benefit that the evporator operated better.
SWPHE condenser
Expansion valve
Liquid receiver
32 A water cooled condenser - CDEW 550/T - for R22 did not give the rated capacity. The nominal thermal duty was: CDEW 550/T S, 860 kW R22 70 C -> 45 C, P = 13 kPa Water 39 C <- 32 C, p = 60 kPa, 106 m3/hr The actual capacity was below 400 kW. Moreover, the P between the compressor discharge exit and the liquid receiver after the condenser was more than one bar, unclear where. The condenser should have only 0.13 bar. This corresponds to a decrease of the actual condensing temperature to a little more than 43 C and a corresponding decrease of the MTD, less 2 K. The decreased MTD explains part of the capacity decrease but, by no mean, all.
Performance problem of a CDEW 550/T at a refrigera-tion plant for the Mauritius Freeport Development Co. Ltd.
Claes Stenhede, Alonte, Sept. 21st, 2005
33 A too small heat exchanger. Unlikely, as similar units had performed well. Too high water temperatures, too low water flow rate and/or too low condensing temperature were ruled out as all were found to be in order. Fouling of the water side. This was ruled out as it was a closed circuit. Inerts in the vapour. Preliminary tests were inconclusive. Flooding of the condenser. Flooding turned out to be the most likely cause of the underperformance but the reason for the flooding could not be found.
34
35
During the cyclone (= Hurricane, typhoon) season there is a danger that the air condensers will be damaged. That would mean a loss refrigerant and maybe a total break down of the system.
36
The air cooled condensers are thus shut down and an emergency circuit for about half the capacity is activated. This is composed of an evaporative cooler integrated into the wall and placed inside the building. The water cools a S&T condenser also placed inside the building.
Air exit S&T condenser Air inlet Evaporative cooler
37
During the normal operation, the air cooled condensers operates at the full capacity, about 1760 kW.
38
During the cyclone season the air cooled condenser is shut off from the system. The valves to the emergency circuit open and connect the S & T condenser to the system. The S&T condenser takes over for the emergency operation with about half the capacity. Only one compressor works.
39
To MP receiver From MP
40
A very high pressure drop was measured between the discharge exit and the HP receiver. To MP receiver From MP The conclusion was that the condensate exit was too small and this caused the high pressure drop and condensate backup in the condenser.
26/06/2011
40
41
1st solution:
To MP receiver From MP A new condenser with double condensate exits was installed. No result, the condenser was still flooded.
26/06/2011
41
42
2nd solution:
To MP receiver From MP The old condenser was fitted with two, double as large exits. No result, the condenser was still flooded.
26/06/2011
42
43
26/06/2011
43
44
44
M3 M2 V1
45
M4
M1
The measurements showed: M2 M3 = 1.0 bar M3 M4 = 0.1 bar M4 M1 0 bar To check the inlet P, the valve V1 interior was removed and the tests repeated: M2 M3 = 0.7 bar (without V1) Over V1 = 0.3 bar (Calculated) The result showed that the inlet had a very much larger pressure drop than foreseen and this caused the flooding.
26/06/2011
45
46
The nominal 50 mm inlet was somewhat too small for the required 860 kW The internal diameter was further reduced to about 43 mm by the threads used at the pressure tests The resulting velocity was more than 50 m/s, far too high for a high density vapour
This high velocity vapour hit an impingement plate and forced to deflect 90 . The result was the very high inlet pressure drop.
26/06/2011
46
47
By increasing the level difference between the condenser and the LR, the effect of the high P the flooding - is removed.
26/06/2011
47
Suggested solution I.
48
By connecting the equalization line to the service connection, the effect of the high P the flooding - is removed.
26/06/2011
48
49
The old and the new condensers are mounted in parallel. The equalization line is connected to the service connections.
26/06/2011
49
50
The equalization line is be connected to the service connection on the S&T condensers.
Either one of the old condensers or a completely new one are fitted with an at least double as large inlet.
26/06/2011
50