Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Shinjini Bhatnagar Centre for Diarrheal Diseases & Nutrition Research Department of Pediatrics All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Oral zinc supplementation in infants admitted with acute dehydrating diarrhea in a tertiary hospital in India; RCT
50 infants, 40 mg/d zinc
Infants with rectal zinc < 15th percentile had significantly lower stool frequency (P < 0.01) and diarrheal duration (p< 0.05)
% reduction (95%CI)
Risk of continued diarrhea % episodes > 7d Mean no of watery stools/d No of days with watery diarrhea 23 (12 to 32)* 39 (7 to 61)* 39 (6 to 70)* 21 (10 to 31)*
Why Zinc?
Zinc deficiency is common Excessive fecal loss of zinc during diarrhea Zinc critical for immune and non immune functions that resist or clear infection & its consequences
Age
6-35 mo 6-30 mo 12-59 mo 18-36 mo 24 mo
Prevalence (%)
36 44 32 68 80 37
2-10 yrs
Ontario
Dev. countries
5-7
<5
yrs
yrs
21
38
The mean prevalence rate of diarrhea associated with fever was 4 times higher in the zinc-deficient
group (P = 0.01)
Pooled analysis of zinc supplementation trials on diarrhea prevention in children <5 years
Zinc 1-2 RDA daily for 4-12 mo India, Mexico, PNG, Peru, Vietnam, Guatemala, Jamaica
18 ( 7 to 28 )*
25 ( 12 to 37 )*
Zinc supplementation reduced the incidence of severe & prolonged diarrhea in young North Indian children
Zinc 1-2 RDA daily for 4 mo
Stool frequency
Rec episodes
Study
Sazawal, 1995 Hidayat, 1998
Roy, 1997
Strand, 2002 Bahl, 2002 Baqui, 2002 Bhatnagar, 2004
101
891 805 1252 266
No. of subjects
931 1368 101 891 805 266
Subjects
111 80 266
Bhatnagar,2004
266
24% reduction
Treatment failure/death
39% reduction
Summary estimates from a pooled analysis of 4 trials: Zinc Investigators Collaborative Group, Am J Clin Nutr 2000
Summary estimates from a pooled analysis of three small trials: Black et al, 1999
Bhatnagar (JPGN)
132/134
Bahl (J Pediatr)
Strand (Pediatrics)
404/401
442/449
20
Possible mechanisms for benefits seen with zinc supplementation in infectious diseases
Correction of zinc deficiency &
immunoreconstitution
Direct effects on the epithelial barrier Direct immunostimulatory effect Anti secretory effect
21 Centre for Diarrhea & Nutrition Research, AIIMS
Zinc critical for immune & non immune functions that resist or clear infection & its consequences
The percentage of anergic children decreased from 67% to 47% (p=0.05) in the zinc supplemented group as compared to the controls Zinc supplemented group had: 25% CD3+ 64% CD4+ (p=0.02) (p=0.001)
On cAMP-stimulated Cl secretion
NKCC
2Cl Na K
?
?
cAMP
3Na Na-K-ATPase
Cl
2K
Does it affect hospitalization? Does it have an impact on mortality? Does it reduce antibiotic use? Does it increase use of ORS?
Effect on mortality & hospitalizations after giving zinc (with ORS) for 14d started during acute diarrhea
20 mg Zn/d for 14 d, Matlab, Bangladesh
Control 6015
50% (6-75%)
Decreased hospitalizations by
24% (2-41%)
25
Introduction of treatment of acute diarrhea with Zinc & ORS vs ORS alone in Indian rural community through Primary Healthcare Workers Benefits in intervention villages compared to control villages
Reduction in:
Diarrhea prevalence in last 2 weeks Pneumonia prevalence in last 2 weeks 44% 45%
59%
78% 58% nil vs Rs. 40
26
27
Zinc sulphate
Zinc acetate
Zinc gluconate
Dose used: 2 RDA
30
Dysentery
Study
No. of sub in comparison groups 32 16, 16 Age Dose & Duration
Outcome
1 - 12 y
569 284, 285 800 children Zn = 170 Vit A =159 Zn + Vit A = 175 Placebo= 161
6-35 mo
Zn (10 mg)
12-35 mo
G1: 20 mg zinc for 14 d+ placebo on D14 G2: Pl +2 l Vit A (D14) G3: 20 mg zn for 14 d + 2l IU vitamin A, on d 14; G4: placebo 14 days
Zn & Vit. A reduced dysentery Rate ratio of 0.80 ( 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95)
246
Zn = 81 Zn+VM= 82 placebo = 83
6-35 mo
56 28,28
12-59 mo
Ipa specific IgG (P 0.001) & lymphocyte proliferation (P 0.002) responses enhanced with zinc
56 28, 28
12-59 mo
Shigellacidal antibody response 73% (zinc) vs 36% (controls); (P 0.01). % CD20+ (P <001) & CD20+ CD38+ (P 0.007) higher in zinc
Zinc supplemented children have a 41% (95% CI 17 to 59%) lower incidence of pneumonia
Pooled analysis of 5 trials; Am J Clin Nutr, 2000 Routine supplementation of 2RDA zinc to children 6mo-3 y; Bhandari et al, BMJ, 2002 No. per group Pneumonia incidence % (95%CI ) reduction 1241/1241 26 (1 to 44)
48 (40-56)
80 (72-96) 72 (72-96) 104 (88-112) 112 (104-112)
56 (40-64)
88 (80-104) 96 (72-96) 112 (104-128) 112 (111-129)
074 (057-098)
079 (061-104) 070 (051-098) 075 (057-098) 075 (057-099)
Overall 20-25% reduction *Zinc for severe pneumonia in very young children: double-blind placebo-controlled trial W Abdullah Brooks et al
68% reduction in mortality in low birth weight Indian infants who were supplemented with zinc from 1 to 9 months of age
LBW infants may require zinc supplements at earlier ages than term AGA infants
Inadequate stores Low breast milk volume in undernourished mothers Extra demands for catch up growth Several fold higher diarrheal morbidity Effects of maternal zinc deficiency on neonatal immune function - may be reversible by postnatal supplement
Implications today
What can be done to improve zinc intakes ?
intake of food with Zn content & bioavailability Zn abs. by soaking, germination, fermentation
Non-enzymatic methods to reduce phytic acid content of plant staples Fortification Soil supplementation Zinc dense or low phytate plants
Future
Understand better how zinc mechanisms
function & translate into clinical application Effectiveness trials to understand introduction of zinc in health programmes Optimal delivery systems Policy decisions for use in young infants Justification of therapeutic dose