Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Agenda
A Brief History
1986
Motorola develops Six Sigma as a methodology to improve the quality of its products. Inherits the principles and tools of continuous improvement and SPC (Statistical Process Control) Some large industrial companies adopt Six Sigma as a strategic initiative: ABB (1993), Honeywell (1994), GE (1995) Initial applications of Six Sigma outside production areas. Six Sigma adoption grows thousands of companies in all industries start deploying it.
1990 2000
Benefits
Motorola Allied Signal General Electric Toshiba Dow Dupont American Express Polaroid Ford Telefnica $ 16,000MM since 1986 $ 1,200MM in 2 years $ 2,000MM in 1999 $ 1,000MM in 2001 $ 1,500MM in 5 years $ 700MM in 2000 $ 200MM in 2002 $ 100MM in first year $ 250K / project $ 30MM in first year
Agenda
A brief history Sigma a process performance metric
Its Standard Deviation a measurement of its variability Its Capability to operate within specifications
s
7 min
Mean 6:55pm
Deliveries
3s
3s
Target 7:00pm
7:15
6s
6s s
7:15
% in Spec 69.1
93.3 99.4
308,500
66,800 6,200
5
6
233
3.4
99.98
99.9997
Is 99% Enough?
99% quality (3.8s)
20,000 Unsafe 5,000
lost mail articles in Europe per hour drinking water 15 minutes each day incorrect surgical operations per week
200,000 No
Agenda
A brief history Sigma a process performance metric
Six Sigma is an organised and rigorous methodology for the continuous improvement of all business processes
Customer
Begin
Control
Control
Control
End
Rework
Review
Scrap
Scrap
Six Sigma starts with a continuous and comprehensive understanding of the customer needs
Process Capability
What constitutes a defect? Process capability Improvement objectives
Target
Lower Limit
Target
Upper Limit
Customer
Who is my customer?
How does our process perform from the customer perspective? How does my customer measure our process?
Shareholder
Employee
Community
25
5060 75
100
125
We need to understand the process variation in order to understand the process. Reducing variation is the main Six Sigma objective.
Example
25
50
Min = 8 Max = 58
April
May
Average
28
25
28
50
Agenda
A brief history Sigma a process performance metric
DMAIC
DFSS
Target
Upper Limit
25
50
75 100
Measure
25
5060 75
100
125
Analyse
B
0 25 5060 75 100 125
Improve
25
5060 75
100
125
Control
Measure
Analyse
Design
Optimise
Verify
Six Sigma can be applied to any process that can be measured that is, to ANY process
Agenda
A brief history Sigma a process performance metric
Cultural Transformation
Business excellence and continuous improvement drive Common language Data based approach to business decision making Obsessive focus on the customer Leadership development platform
Web 2.0
Definition
Web 2.0 refers to a perceived second generation of web development and design, that facilitates communication, secure information sharing, interoperability, and collaboration on the world wide web. Web 2.0 concepts have led to the development and evolution of web based communities, hosted services, and applications; such as social networking sites, video sharing sites, wikis, blogs. Examples - Facebook, Orkut, Linkedin, Twitter
Evolution E-mail, instant messaging, hosting your own web pages, software as a service
Collaboration
Webster definition To labor together (from latin word collaborare) To Co operate with an agency or instrumentality with which one is not immediately connected To work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavor Web 2.0 ----
MS Sharepoint
Pros Strong Microsoft products compatibility (MS Word, Excel, Project, Visio) Good User Interface Document Repository (can store all kinds of documents, no limit to size of document) & Strong version control Cons Limited customize options Expensive Solution Proprietary solution
Wiki
Pros Customizable Flexible formatting Strong Version Control (All changes to Wiki pages are captured) Open Source solution Cons No document repository (2MB limit to upload documents) User Interface Needs technical know how to make complex edits
Webex Connect
Pros Advanced UI Can include other tools (internal browser) Very flexible
Cons Still in Beta Performance issues Scope and functionality yet to be baselined (not clear)
Web 2.0 Tools Comparison chart Wiki vs. Sharepoint vs. Webex Connect
Confluence Wiki Controlled Access Cost to Dept Type Internal/ External Document Management Project & Program Management Operations and Communications Management Collaborative Content Management Best Practices & Repository Library No No Few to many Internal No Yes Yes MS Sharepoint Yes Yes Few to many Internal Yes Yes Yes Webex Connect Yes No Few to many Internal No (partial) No Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ease of set up
3/5
3/5
3/5