PROJECT ON

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF HUL

Click to edit Master subtitle style

BY:PRITIKA JAGDALE :18 KANCHAN PATEL : 34 AMOL PAWAR : 36

4/28/12

Click to edit Master subtitle style

4/28/12

INDUSTRY DATA
OBJECTIVE GROWTH AND MARKET SHARE

4/28/12

MARKET SHARE OF HUL

4/28/12

4/28/12

Product of HUL

4/28/12

4/28/12

RATIOS
Profitability Ratio :

Return on Capital Ratio :

Years Ratio 2010 104.78 2009 121.81 2007 140.49 2006 66.58

Return on Equity Ratio :

Years Ratio

2010 77.98

2009 116.60

2007 120.88

2006 56.53

4/28/12

Turnover Ratio : Debtor Turnover Ratio : 2010 Years

2009 37.70

2007 30.84

2006 27.48

Ratio

25.83

Years Ratio

Debtor Collection Period Ratio :

2010 2009 9.68 14.13

2007 11.83

2006 13.28

Solvency Ratio : Debt Equity Ratio : Years 2010

2009 0.20

2007 0.06

2006 0.03

Ratio

0.00

4/28/12

Common Size Statement

v

Profit and loss A/C In the current year the PAT of hul has been decreased to 0.38 %(2010-11.50% ,200911.88%) in the previous year ,there is need for improvement in profitability. Further analysis indicates that there is profitability have been more because there have been decrease in operating expense i.e. 2010 85.46% as compared to previous years 09,07,06.
4/28/12

Balance sheet

It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have decreased as2010 17.76% is compared with 2009 where as if we compared with 2007 &2006 then in 2010 there is increased in current asset . Loan &advances have decreased (7.27%) which a good sign for as compared with 09,07,06. The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased as compared with the 09,07,06. But there 4/28/12 overall facts signals that there is satisfactory

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT
Profit and loss A/C
v

In 2009 2010

The PAT has been decreased by 16.18% .

Further analysis indicates there e will be profitability because there is decrease in In 2007 operating expenses by 14.83%. 2009

The PAT has been increased by 38.15%, this reflecting improvement in efficiency of manufacturing operation.

Further analysis indicates that profitability would have been more but for an increase in operating 4/28/12

In 2006 2007 The PAT has been increased by 13% , this reflecting improvement in efficiency of manufacturing operation.

Futher analysis indicates tht profitability vBalance have been more but for an increase in would sheet operating expenses by 12.83%. In 2009 2010

It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have decreased by 4.16%.Inventories have been decrease by 13.80%.

The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased by 16.41%,these fact signal overall 4/28/12

In 2007 2009 It show that current assets as a percentage of total asset have increased by 70.90%.Inventories have been increased by 29.45%. In 2006 2007 The current liabilities in 2010 has been It show that current assets as a percentage increased by 13.16%, these fact signal overall increase in liquidityincreasedof the firm . of total asset have position by 3.40%.Inventories have been increased by 26.22%.

The current liabilities in 2010 has been increased by 13.00%,these fact signal overall increase in liquidity position of the firm .

4/28/12

PORTER'S FIVE FORCES MODEL

4/28/12

4/28/12

allocation of Bharat Nirman programme Remuneration was increased under the NREGA scheme MAT has been increased from 18% to 18.5% Overall the budget has been positive for the HUL especially when the FMCG sector is kneeling under surging input costs and high inflation.

IMPACT OF BUDGET 2011 A proposal was made to increase the

4/28/12

CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION

HUL

derives more than 50% of its sales from rural markets Better infrastructure facilities will improve their supply chain HUL have immense possibilities for growth Increased focus on farm sector will boost rural incomes

4/28/12