Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Descriptive Overview
Market approach an incentive-based policy that encourages conservative practices or pollution reduction strategies
Difference between market approach and commandand-control approach is how each approach attempts to achieve its objectives
Descriptive Overview
Identifying Types of Market Instruments
Pollution charge Subsidies Deposit/refund systems Pollution permit trading systems
Pollution Charges
Pollution charge a fee that varies with the amount of pollutants released
Polluter-pays principle Product charge a fee added to the price of a pollution-generating product based on its quantity or some attribute responsible for pollution
Pollution Charges
Modeling a Product Charge as a Per Unit Tax
Policy motivation of a product charge is to induce firms to internalize the externality by taking account of the MEC in their production decisions Pigouvian tax a unit charge on a good whose production generates a negative externality such that the charge equals the MEC at QE Assessing the Model Difficult to identify the dollar value of MEC at QE Model implicitly allows only for an output reduction to abate pollution
5
Pollution Charges
Figure 5.1 Implementation of a Pigouvian Tax to Achieve Efficiency
Pollution Charges
Modeling an Emission Charge: Single-Polluter Case
Emission or effluent charge a fee imposed directly on the actual discharge of pollution Assessing the Model Emission charge stimulates the natural economic incentives of the polluter
Pollution Charges
Figure 5.2 Modeling an Emission Charge for a Single Firm
Pollution Charges
Figure 5.3 Effect of Technology Improvement on a Firms Least-Cost Decision Making
Pollution Charges
Modeling an Emission Charge: Multi-Polluter Case
Assessing the Model Emission charge exploits each polluters natural incentive to pursue a least-cost strategy Low-cost abaters do most of the cleaning up and highcost abaters pay more in taxes to cover the greater damages they cost Potential increase in monitoring costs Part of tax burden is shared with consumers in form of higher prices
10
Pollution Charges
Figure 5.4 Effect of an Emission Charge in a Two-Polluter Model
11
Pollution Charges
Pollution Charges In Practice
Internationally, pollution charge is most commonly used market-based instrument Several countries use effluent charges to control the noise pollution generated by aircraft Real-world application of the product charge is one levied on lubricant oils by Finland, Hungary, and Italy
12
Environmental Subsidies
Two major types of subsidies:
Abatement equipment subsidies Pollution reduction subsidies
13
Environmental Subsidies
Modeling an Abatement Equipment Subsidy
Abatement equipment subsidy a payment aimed at lowering the cost of abatement technology Attempts to internalize the positive externality associated with the consumption of abatement activities Pigouvian subsidy a per unit payment on a good whose consumption generates a positive externality such that the payment equals the MEB at QE Assessing the model
Difficulty measuring the MEB May bias polluters decisions about how best to abate
14
Environmental Subsidies
Modeling a Per Unit Subsidy on Pollution Reduction
Per unit subsidy on pollution reduction a payment for every unit of pollution removed below some predetermined level Assessing the Model Might be less disruptive than an equipment subsidy Can have perverse effect of elevating pollution levels in the aggregate
15
Environmental Subsidies
Environmental Subsidies in Practice
Internationally, many countries offer environmental subsidies in the form of grants or low-interest loans In the United States, the most common use is federal funding for publicly owned treatment works
16
Deposit/Refund Systems
Deposit/refund system a market instrument that imposes an up-front charge to pay for potential damages and refunds it for returning a product for proper disposal or recycling
Combines the incentive characteristic of a pollution charge with a built-in mechanism for controlling monitoring costs
17
Deposit/Refund Systems
Economics of Deposit/refund Systems
Intended to force the potential polluter to account for both the marginal private cost (MPC) and the marginal external cost (MEC) of improper waste disposal Targets the potential polluter instead of penalizing the actual polluter
18
Deposit/Refund Systems
Modeling a Deposit/Refund System
Deposit serves the same function as a pollution charge with the critical difference that the refund helps to deter improper waste disposal Assessing the Model Encourages environmentally responsible behavior without adding to monitoring and compliance costs Can be used to encourage more efficient use of raw materials
19
Deposit/Refund Systems
Figure 5.5 A Pigouvian Subsidy in the Market for Scrubbers
20
Deposit/Refund Systems
Deposit/Refund Systems in Practice
Beverage container disposal Disposal of used tire, car hulks, and lead-acid batteries
21
Deposit/Refund Systems
Figure 5.6 Modeling a Deposit/Refund System in the Market for
Waste Disposal
22
23
24
26