Writ of certiorari is review of adverse local agency decisions. A local PHA decision with respect to eligibility for Section 8 benefits is reviewable. Local government agencies must follow their own rules.
Writ of certiorari is review of adverse local agency decisions. A local PHA decision with respect to eligibility for Section 8 benefits is reviewable. Local government agencies must follow their own rules.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PPT, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Writ of certiorari is review of adverse local agency decisions. A local PHA decision with respect to eligibility for Section 8 benefits is reviewable. Local government agencies must follow their own rules.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PPT, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
REVIEW OF ADVERSE LOCAL AGENCY DETERMINATIONS Why Certiorari?
• State court vs Federal Court
– Jurisdictional issues; – Scope of Review – Judicial interest – Speed – Guarantee of review – Local politics – Availability of Interim Injunctive Relief What is Certiorari?
• Various types - we are discussing
– Appellate review of local agency decisions by Circuit Court Appellate Dept. What is reviewable?
• Quasi judicial decisions of agencies,
boards and local government commissions not directly appealable by way of another provision of general law. Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(2) What is reviewable? • Determinations governed by APA are not subject to writ of cert in circuit court. Appeal is directly to Court of Appeal.
• Decision probably does not have to
be in writing to be reviewable.
• Certain constitutional challenges
may not be reviewable by writ of cert. What is reviewable? • A local PHA decision with respect to eligibility for Section 8 benefits is reviewable
• Most PHA hearing decisions are
reviewable by cert. (must be quasi- judicial) Standard of Review • Circuit Court, Appellate Dept. (first tier) Standard – (1) whether procedural due process is afforded; – (2) whether the essential elements of the law were observed; – (3) whether the administrative findings and judgment are supported by ‘competent substantial evidence’; Standard of Review
• Whether procedural due process is
afforded
While the quality of due process necessary in a
quasi-judicial proceeding is not the same as a full judicial hearing, “parties must be able to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be informed of all the facts upon which the commission acts.” Coral Reef Nurseries, Inc. v. Babcock, Co., 410 So.2d 648, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Jennings v. Dade County, et al., 589 So.2d 1337, 1341 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1991) Standard of Review • “essential elements of the law”
Local government agencies must follow their own
rules. Miami-Dade County v. Omnipotent Holdings, Inc., 863 So.2d 375, 376 (3rd DCA 2003)(“Neither a quasi-judicial body nor a reviewing circuit court is permitted to add to or detract from these criteria (the local regulations) when making its assigned determination.”) and cases cited therein. Standard of Review • “essential elements of the law” – “essential elements” are not limited to federal regulations; – “essential elements” should include all written local rules and procedures; – “essential elements” should include local Section 8 hearing & notice procedures as well as any elements regarding the basis for termination. Standard of Review • whether the administrative findings and judgment are supported by ‘competent substantial evidence
• Court does not reweigh the evidence
• Court does not review adverse evidence • Court looks only at supportive evidence and determines if it is ‘competent and substantial.’ • Very deferential – any competent and substantial evidence is sufficient. Procedure • Time Limits for Filing Writ must be “filed within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.” Rule 9.100(c)
In Public Housing context when is the order final –
is appeal to the Director possible or necessary? Procedure Pleadings Required – Petition Rule 9.100 – Appendix Rule 9.100(g) – No need for separate record Procedure – Petition • Caption – Writ of Cert to Circuit Court Appellate Dept. Pursuant to Rule 9.100 – Include the Lower Tribunal Case # • Contents – Jurisdictional Basis – Factual basis for relief – Nature of relief sought – Argument with citations to authority – Limited to 50 pages Procedure – Petition • Formal Appellate Font Rules – Times New Roman 14 pt/ Courier New 12pt • Certificate of Compliance with Font/Typeface Rules • Double-spaced (except quotes and footnotes) • Appellate Uniform Citations rules • 1 inch margins Procedure – Appendix • Must be filed in every case; • Must contain “such portions of the record deemed necessary to an understanding of the issues presented.” • Petition must reference relevant pages of the Appendix. • Separately bound or separated from Petition. Procedure – Appendix • Contents – Decision appealed from; – Transcript (if needed for your review); – Exhibits, Documents from record; – Appendix must be limited to the record; – Circuit Court review cannot extend beyond the record of the quasi-judicial hearing. Procedure – Filing • Petition & Appendix are filed with Circuit Court – Appellate Dept. w/filing fee; • Make sure clerk is aware that it is appellate pleading; • Must be Filed with proof of service by mail on Respondents (personal service not necessary as this is essentially an appeal of the lower tribunal proceeding); Procedures – Post Filing • Circuit Court issues Order to Show Cause – Generally issued automatically and shortly after filing; – No set time period for issuance but if there is significant delay make sure pleading was correctly filed; – OSC provides Respondents with date that response brief is due; – No other pleadings (such as Motion to Dismiss) Procedures – Post Filing • Response Brief – can supplement the Appendix; • Limited to 50 pages; • Must comply with same technical formatting requirements;
• Reply Brief – is due twenty days after
Response; • Limited to 15 pages. Argument • This is probably an interesting case to these judges; • Mostly handling appeals from County Court; • Care about local politics; • Level of preparation varies; Decision
• Circuit Court can only Quash the
decision of the lower tribunal and remand the case to them. Appeal • Only appeal is by Writ of Cert to the District Court of Appeal (second tier review) • Second tier review is extremely limited – Did Circuit Court provide due process – Did Circuit Court apply correct law.