Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
David Biggs
Agenda
Understand method driven v laissez-faire approaches in consultancy Understand the contribution that different disciplines can give to consultancy Have knowledge about techniques and models in consulting especially in terms of:
matrix
Laissez faire consultancy is when a new method of conducting the work is created from scratch for each new assignment Method driven consultancy is when each project uses the same methodology and procedures Most projects and sometimes consultancies sit on a continuum between laissez-faire and method driven consultancy
1.
2.
The danger with method driven consultancy is twofold: If the methodology does not develop then it may become obsolete The methodology may be poached by others and then offered at a cheaper rate, which invariably means that to compete, rates must decline to remain competitive
Group Exercise
Individual consultants prefer different levels of method Spend 5 minutes in pairs thinking of the following and what levels of method they would prefer using the continuum from Biggs (2010):
New
recruits Junior consultants (with 1 years experience) Young but experienced consultants (with 4 years experience) Managing consultants (with 10+ years
Disciplines in consulting
Consultancies employ many different experts in fields such as human resource management to engineers One particular consultancy listed a staggering 459 unique services and skills (Biggs, 2010) Diverse disciplines invariably have different techniques A combination of different experts for a project give consultancies clear advantages as they combine different disciplines
Consultancy techniques
Consultancy techniques are often published as it leads to increased revenue for the firm (Saint-Martin, 2000) Obolensky (2001) listed the many models as: Matrix based formulations models Mnemonic letter based models Issues and themes models Other models include value chain analysis, supply and demand analysis and financial models
The Boston Consulting Group Growth-Share Matrix (adapted from Henderson, 1970)
Public Image
Addressed by honest & open management
Blind Spots
unknow n to staff
Competitors
The 3 Cs Framework (adapted from Ohmae, 1982)
Product
Price
Promotion
Place
McKinseys 7 S model
Structure
Strategy
Shared Value Skills
Systems
Style
Staff
OPPORTUNITIES
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
THREATS
Buyers
(Bargaining power of buyers)
Suppliers
(Bargaining power of suppliers)
Summary
Most projects/consultancies on a continuum that has increasing use of established methods Different disciplines can be combined together in a Gestalt manner that the whole is greater than its parts Consultancy techniques are widely published to maximise potential clients Techniques can be classified and often have a common basis
Further reading
Biggs, D.M. (2010), Management Consultancy: A guide for students London: Cengage Ltd Chapter 4
Biswas, S. and Twitchell, D. (2001), Management consulting: a complete guide to the industry, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons Markham, C. (2004), The Top Consultant: Developing Your Skills for Greater Effectiveness. London: Kogan Page Ltd; 4 Rev Ed edition Obolensky, N. (1994), Practical Business Reengineering: tools and techniques for achieving effective change. London: Kogan Page Ltd