Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Status
Self-Esteem
Power
Goal
Achievement
throughputs
Group Process
norms cohesiveness communication
outputs
Remember...
when
individuals are in groups they act differently than when they are alone
Group Structure
Groups are not unorganized mobs. They have structure that shapes the member behavior
Group Structure
Formal
Leadership
Roles
Norms Status Size Composition
Cohesiveness
Rules
Stage V: Adjourning
Forming
Group
members try to get to know each other and establish a common understanding.
Uncertainty about the groups purpose, structure, and leadership
Storming
Group
is in conflict, members resist being controlled by the group, and disagreements arise concerning leadership in the group.
Resistance to constraints that group impose on individuality Conflict
Norming
Group
members develop close ties, feelings of friendship and camaraderie abound, and group members share a common purpose.
Strong sense of group identity Relationship development Cohesion
Performing
Group
Adjourning
The
but, . . .
does
the five stage model actually reflect what happens in REAL GROUPS??
Group Norms
Informal
- assenting to a norm in order to attain rewards or avoid punishment. Identification - associating oneself with supporters of a norm and conforming to the norm because those individuals do.
- believing that the behavior dictated by a norm is truly the right and proper way to behave.
Socialization:
The
process by which newcomers learn the roles, rules, and norms of a group.
Gains - Increases in potential performance that result from new ways of motivating and coordinating members. Social Loafing - Tendency of individuals to exert less effort when they work in a group than when they work alone.
Individual Contributions Identifiable Make Individuals Feel That They Are Making Valuable Contributions to a Group Keep Group as Small as Possible
Advice to Managers
Keep
work groups as small as possible while making sure that a group has enough resources (member knowledge, skills, experiences) to achieve its goals.
Size Similarity/Diversity of Group Members Competition with Other Groups Success Exclusiveness
High productivity
Low productivity
Moderate productivity
Moderate to low productivity
+ =
Actual group effectiveness
Cohesion
Low
Collection of people Low
Silos
Individuality
High
Model of Groupthink
Characteristics of GroupThink
2
Initial Conditions
Initial Conditions
High
cohesiveness Insulation of the team from outsiders Lack of methodical procedures for search and appraisal Directive leadership High stress with a low degree of hope for finding a better solution than the one favored by the leader or other influential persons Complex/changing environment
Characteristics of Groupthink
Collective
rationalization Belief in inherent morality of the team Stereotypes of other groups Direct pressure on dissenters Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Self-appointed mind guards
survey of alternatives Failure to examine risks of preferred choice Poor information search Selective bias in processing information at hand Failure to reappraise alternatives Failure to work out contingency plans
spontaneous, participative decision-making technique that groups use to generate a wide range of alternatives from which to make a decision.
Brainstorming
Separate
idea generation from evaluation Produces many new ideas Stimulates creativity Group meets together Much group interaction
Consensus Decision
A proposal that is acceptable enough that all members are willing to support it.
an agenda, distribute in advance. Consult with participants before meeting. Get participants to go over agenda. Establish specific time parameters. Maintain focused discussion.
and support participation of all. Maintain a balanced style. Encourage clash of ideas. Discourage clash of personalities. Be an effective listener. Bring proper closure.