Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OBJECTIVE
PROMOTION & DEVELOPENT OF NON CONVENTIONAL AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROGRAMMES/PROJECT. TO MAKE BSES EFFECTIVE IN QUALITY & RELIABILITYOF POWER SUPPLY. TO PROMOTE & FACILITATE PROJECT FOR AVAILING CARBON CREDIT UNDRE CDM OF UNFCC.
On the basis of Report, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was formulated in May 1992 for global climate protection. India signed UNFCCC on 10th June 1992 and ratified that in 1993.
Contd.
Commits Industrialised Countries (Annex I Parties / Countries) to reduce their Green House Gas (GHG) emissions by, on average, 5.2 % below 1990 levels in 2008-12 (Phase I). Individual, quantified emission targets for each Annex-1Country fixed.
Flexible Mechanisms
Came into force on 16th February 2005 after Russia and European Community ratified it. Major non participants: USA and Australia.
GENERATE CER
REGESTER CER
BUY CER
According to these methodologies, the implementation of EE measures for T&D loss reduction can include: Up-grading the voltage on a transmission or distribution system Replacing existing transformers with more efficient transformers (e.g., replacement of a silicon steel core transformer with an amorphous metal transformer)
AMS IIA: Supply side energy efficiency improvements transmission and distribution
Existing LT Distribution Network
Present LT Distribution system consists of 3 phase distribution transformer with a capacity of 100 KVA /400KA which feeds supply to all the consumers through 3 phase 4 wire LT network.
Lengthy LT Lines.
Voltage drop at the consumer end. High I2R losses . Frequent motor burn-outs due to low voltage and consequent expenditure on repairs. Transformer failures-expenditure towards repairs and inconvenience to the consumers.
SOLUTION - HVDS
To improve quality of supply and reduce losses, HVDS is recommended
High Voltage Distribution System (HVDS) In this system , 11 KV lines are extended to as nearer to the loads as possible and erection of small size single and three phase transformers of 5, 10 or 15 KVA is done Aim at LT less system starting from Less LT
Unavoidable short LT lengths to be covered by insulated wires like ABC (Aerial Bunched Cables)
ADVANTAGES OF HVDS
The registered customers will feel ownership and take responsibility and not allow others to meddle with the L.T. Network Prevention of unauthorized loads by the consumers themselves since the distribution transformer may fail if loaded beyond its capacity In the event of equipment failure only 2 or 3 customers will get affected instead of 25 to 30 customers in original system High quality of supply since there is practically no voltage drop Less burnouts of motors because of good voltage and less fluctuations Considerable reduction in line losses and consequent savings in power purchase cost Since Losses are reduced considerably , Power can be supplied to additional loads without any further investment on infrastructure Accidents due to touching of snapped conductors reduced due to the fact breaker trips at substation since the line is at 11 KV potential that the
Where P Max demand in kVA L - Line Length in km R - Equivalent resistance in ohm/ km LLF- Loss load factor, for distribution systems, loss load factor is given by 0.2 LF + 0.8 (LF)2, Where LF is the load factor and is defined as the ratio of average load and maximum demand of the total group of consumers. DF - Diversity factor (DF) is defined as the ratio of sum of individual maximum demand and sum of simultaneous max demand of total group of consumers LDF: LDF represents the Load Distribution Factor and is calculated as following Load Distribution Factor = P x L Km x kva
BSES
Summation of the Energy losses at individual DTR level would give the energy losses in a feeder and summation of energy losses in a feeder would provide the total energy losses in the baseline.
Summation of the Energy losses at individual DTR level would give the energy losses in a feeder and summation of energy losses in a feeder would provide the total energy losses in the baseline. EL= ELDTR ELDTR =ELFEEDER ELFEEDER =ELBASELINE EL Energy losses given by the equation ELDTR Energy losses at the DTR level (i.e. from distribution transformer to consumers) ELfeeder Energy losses for LT sections of the feeder ELBaseline Baseline energy losses m Total number of feeders covered under the project n Total number of DTRs in a Feeder
Emission reduction calculation based on technical energy loss reduction is described below
ERy = [(EL s ) / {(1- 0.1}*BEF]- Leakage Emission Where: ERy Emission Reductions in tCO2e ELs Savings in technical loss of energy in MWh BEF Baseline Emission Factor in tCO2e/MWh Leakage Technical loss attributable to existing equipment being used outside the project boundary
BEF = WOM* EF OM, Y + WBM * EF BM,y = 0.83 * 1.01+ 0.17 * 0.68= 0.9539 tCO2/MWh Emission Reduction ERy = [(EL s) / {(1- 0.1}*BEF] - Leakage emission -------(D) Leakage Emission -------- (5) As per AMS.II.A leakage emission are considered as zero = [(48289.34787)/ (1-0.1)]*0.9589 - 0 = 51181.342 tCO2e
DISRIBUTED GENERATION
POWER GENERATED FROM THE PV SYSTEM SHALL BE USED BY THE HOUSE IN CASE LOAD EXCEEDS GENERATION POWER SHALL BE EXPORTED TO GRID DURING NO LOAD/LESS LOAD CONDITIONS POWER GENERATED SHALL ALSO PROVIDE BACK-UP POWER TO EMERGENCY LOADS DURING GRID FAILURE FOR WHICH A BATTERY BANK IS ALSO THERE.
PROPOSAL-2 EACH BENEFICIARY TO PAY 100% OFPROPOSALTHE COST, ENTIRE GENERATION TO BE ALLOWED FOR BILLING AT CERC TARIFF.
Baseline emissions:
The baseline emissions for the project activity will be multiplication of the net electricity exported to grid and the combined margin grid emission factor. BE y = EG y EFgrid , CM ,y Where: BEy= Baseline emissions in year y (tCO2/yr). EGy= Electricity supplied by the project activity to the grid (MWh).
10 MW PLANT DESCRIPTION
Project cost Project cost per MW TARIFF SUMMARY Levelised tariff Rs/ kwh Generation based incentives GBI period 15.56 RS RS11.81/ kwh 10 year 174.2 cr 17.42 cr /MW
13281.91
9 EURO =68.5
CER IN LAKH
81.8829875
Emissions of RDF burning are superior to that of coal burning with less NOX and SO2. RDF as a Coal substitute has a good track record Instant MSW volume reduction is possible only through incineration Energy recovery from Garbage can be through RDF/electricity RDF incineration is economical than Garbage incineration. No Dioxines or Furons emissions.
Proximate Analysis Moisture : Volatile Matter : Ash Content : Fixed Carbon : Ultimate Analysis Carbon : Hydrogen : Nitrogen : Sulphur :
Emission Reductions
To calculate the emission reductions the project participant shall apply the following equation: ERy = BEy PEy Ly Where: ERy is the emissions reductions in year y (t CO2e) BEy is the emissions in the baseline scenario in year y (t CO2e) PEy is the emissions in the project scenario in year y (t CO2e) Ly is the leakage in year y (t CO2e)
Parameter
BE y PE y Ly ER y
Value
1,466,149 346,125 531 1119493
Unit
Ton CO2 Ton CO2 Ton CO2 Ton CO2
Remarks
Description
Total Project Cost Equity Debt Equity debt ratio Levelized cost of Tariff without MNRE grant (25 year)
Levelized cost of Tariff without MNRE grant INR 5.44 / kWh (25year) and expected CDM revenue (25 year) (assuming 1CER=15 EURO and 1 EURO = INR 65)
Conclusion
Discom will able to meet peak power demand Self generated renewable energy. Reduce AT&C losses Reduce generation cost & can get tariff margin Benefit of CER Quality & reliable power
Thank You