Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
Introduce the Working Late project
life course
Explore physical activity levels Evaluate occupational health initiatives Feedback from organisational stakeholders
Ageing
Increasing age of the UK workforce
Important to maintain health, productivity and quality of working life Need to promote a healthy working environment
Working Late
Collaborative Research Project supported by the New Dynamics of Ageing programme
Aims
Explore the dynamics of later life working
Develop interventions to improve health and workability Develop design solutions to improve the quality of working life
1. User Engagement
Engagement with users to inform research process Research presented to, discussed with, and modified by selected user groups
3.2 Interventions
Development of health education materials to engage and motivate employees Implement occupational health physical activity interventions Long term intervention to test and evaluate health promoting activity interventions
Develop design models for an inclusive workplace using Organiser for Working Late
Current OH Strategies
Summary:
Survey with employees:
Identify use and experiences of OH Feedback from health initiatives Physical activity levels
Interviews and focus groups with managers and Occupational Health professionals
Questionnaire
Personal and Organisational Demographics Use of Occupational Health Lifestyle and Physical Activity Domain Specific Sitting Time Questionnaire Work Ability Index General Health Questionnaire Job Attitudes (job satisfaction, organisational commitment, job motivation, intention to quit)
Results
August 2009 to March 2010 596 responses June 2010 to July 2010 217 responses February 2011 to April 2011 328 responses Total: 1141 completed questionnaires 145 Organisations: Private sector: 59.3% Public sector: 40.7%
Demographic Profile
Male: 45% Female: 55% Age = 43 11.9 years
Results
66% of respondents regularly engage in physical activity Recommended: 30 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity, 5 times per week
(Pre July 2011)
Meet guidelines
13.4% 8.0%
50.2% 28.4%
Sedentary Time
Activity In transport At work Watching TV Using a computer Other leisure activities (socialising, cinema, etc) Sleeping at night Feet up (lying down) Workday 1hr 5m 5hrs 7m 1hr 34m 52m 40m 6hrs 42m 1hr 46m Non workday 54m 55m 2hrs 41m 1hr 30m 2hrs 25m 7hrs 20m 2hrs 36m
Sitting Time
600
Workday
Non workday
Relationships
Significant positive correlation between sitting time spent at work and:
Sitting time outside of work General Health Questionnaire Body Mass Index
540
520
Normal
Overweight
Obese
BMI Group
Press Coverage
Occupational Health
34% of the sample had contact with OH
Poor Satisfactory Good
Excellent
Health screening
Information on illnesses and diseases Smoking and alcohol programmes Nutrition and healthy eating
15.0%
15.0% 14.5% 11.2%
Participation
Yes: 37.7% No: 62.3%
Do not want to be told what to do Not enough time Not applicable (e.g. non-smoker) Poor quality initiative
Feedback
What could be improved? More accessible Company cooperation Improved resources Descriptions Make available for all sites and all staff. Run regularly and at different times Support from senior managers and company allowing staff to participate Improve information targeted and easy to understand, more publicity, more than just a website
Feedback
What is good? Knowledge and awareness Employee health Workplace atmosphere Initiative specific Descriptions Increases awareness of health issues, provides ideas and facts, improves understanding Helped improve health (e.g. stop smoking, lose weight) Improved team relationships, team building, shows company cares Inclusive, enjoyable, proactive, varied, accessible, valid, choice to participate
Barriers
Lack of trust
Historically in the UK, if you were sent to see occupational health, the next thing you got was your P45.
Barriers
Knowledge of services
There is a high level of ignorance among many managers of exactly what occupational health does and how it can provide them with a service.
Effective Interventions
Relevance
Trying to run interventions which have a relevance, so where there are a lot of musculoskeletal disorders, having something like a back care clinic.
Summary
Findings highlight low engagement and awareness of OH department and initiatives
Scope for promoting incidental activity & reducing sedentary time
Summary
Challenges for OH provision at the individual and organisational level Research has helped to identify what OH initiatives employees may value Evidence based occupational health provision for an older workforce
Contact
A.Kazi@lboro.ac.uk www.workinglate.org