Téléversements by Christopher Martin Gunsat

[Appendix 1] RPMS Tool for T I-III SY 2020-2021 in the time of COVID-19

2017 HAP Nomination Form 3 (Dangal ng Bayan)

2017 HAP Nomination Form 1 (LB and Pag_indiv)

Microlearning Final Output - Christopher Gunsat

Character-integrated Lesson Plan

Collaborative Learning Lesson Plan - Christopher Gunsat

e. Legend Hotel (Manila) v. Titanium Corp., G.R. No. 153511, July 18, 2012

d. Torillo v. Leogardo 197 SCRA 471 (1991)

c. LVN Pictures v. Philippine Musicians Guild 1 SCRA 132 (1961)

b. Vda. De Cruz v. Manila Hotel, 101 Phil. 358 (1957)

a. Viana v. Al-lagadan, 99 Phil. 408 (1956)

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED

CASE GUIDE - RULE 114 (BAIL)

CASES FOR RULE 114 (BAIL)

DIGESTS

Module 3 - Conceptual Framework and Review of Related Literature

Module 4 - Understanding Data and Ways to Systematically Collect

Module 5 - Data Collection Presentation and Analysis

Module 6 - Research Conclusions and Recommendations

Module 1 - Nature of Inquiry and Research

20160115-RA-10742-BSA

Sea Me o 202008 Llc Wg 1000799

Sea Me o 202008 Llc Wg 1000799

OralRubric (1)

Teach On 2020 1 COurse Guide

How to Certificate WinS MOOC Final.V

243522

Alfi v. Garin

Lawyer's Oath

PROPERTY-NOTES

Charter of the United Nations and ICJ Statute and Rules of Court

The-Lotus-Case-Was-the-Ship-Ever-Afloat

SUA Convention and Protocol

Vienna Convention with Respect to Succession of States

MCF JAR 10(c) Motion to Allow Compliant Replacement Affidavits

MCF 2.6 Motion to Sever Misjoined Cause of Action

CIVIL-LAW

Sample Digest

Southern Luzon Drug Corp. v. DSWD

Philippine American Life Insurance Company v. Auditor General

National Development Company v. Philippine Veterans Bank

Goldenway Merchandising Corp. v. Equitable PCI Bank

Abe v. Foster Wheeler Corp.

Treñas vs. People.pdf

54 - Sps. Lam v. Kodak Philippines

53 - Torres- Madrid Brokerage v. Feb Mitsui Marine Insurance Co..pdf

52 - Ruks Konsult and Construction v. Adworld Sign and Advertising Corp.

51 - Calang v. People

50 - Arco Pulp and Paper Co. v. Lim