- DocumentPhilamgen vs. Sweet Lines Inc 212 S 195 - Googletéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentMarcos v Heirs of Navarro GR 198240 July 3, 2013téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentMarcos v Heirs of Navarro GR 198240 July 3, 2013téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentUSE-Country-Bankerstéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentUSE - Silot v Dela Rosa GR 159240 Feb 4, 2008 - Google-1téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentAlano vs. CA 283 S 269 - Googletéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentRecit - Tuason v. CA, 241 Scratéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentRECIT - Saura vs Atty Agdeppa AC 4426 February 17, 2000téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentRECIT - Gonzales vs Court of Appeals GR 117740 October 30, 1998téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentGonzales vs Court of Appeals GR 117740 October 30, 1998téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentTUASON v. CA, 241 SCRAtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentSaura vs Atty Agdeppa AC 4426 February 17, 2000téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCebu Shipyardtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document-Bachrach-v-CIRtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentHeirs of the Late Spouses Maglasang v. Manila Banking Corp+téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentNotes Jan 31, 2019 TAX2.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentGotesco vs Chatto G.R. No. L-87584 June 16, 1992.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Documentestatetaxmyths-1.pdftéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentDizon v CTA G.R. No. 140944 April 30, 2008.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCIR vCIR v. PINEDA GR No. L-22734, September 15, 1967 21 SCRA 105.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentRR No. 13-2018 Corrected Copy(1).pdftéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentWhy the U.S. can learn from New Zealand when it comes to taxes.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentA European-style tax?.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document9-2000 and 74-99.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCIR vs. Embroidery & Garments Industries Phils, GR 96262 March 22, 1999.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentMEDICARD PHILIPPINES, INC VS. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (GR NO. 222743) April 5, 2017.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document(1) Sy Po v. CA, et al., GR 81446, August 18, 1988.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCIR vs. Cebu Portland Cement Company and CTA, G.R. No. L-29059, December 15, 1987.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCollector vs. Zulueta 100 Phil 872, G.R. No. L-8840. February 8, 1957.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document(2) CIR v. Pascor Realty and Development Corp., Et Al., G.R. No. 128315, June 29, 1999, 309 SCRA 402téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentRR No. 13-2018 Corrected Copy.pdftéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document(BIR Ruling No. 113-98 dated July 23, 1998).docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document9-2000 and 74-99.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentVALUE ADDED TAX Notes from BIR.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document040-98.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentFREDCO MANUFACTURING vs (HARVARD UNIVERSITY), G.R. No. 185917.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentConverse vs Universal Rubber G.R. No. L-27906 January 8, 1987.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentFaberge , Incorporated v. The Intermediate Appellate Court and Co Beng Kay.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentEtepha v. Director of Patents (G.R. No. L-20635).docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- Document118102937 Digest Romero vs Maidentéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentACOJE MINING CO., INC. vs THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS G.R. No. L-28744 April 29, 1971.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentSta.Ana v. Maliwat Digest G.R. No. L-23023 August 31, 1968.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentInchausti & Company v. Song Fo & Company, G.R. No. 6623 (January 26, 1912).pdftéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentPhilip Morris, Inc. vs. Fortune Tobacco Corporation, 493 SCRA 333, G.R. No. 158589 June 27, 2006téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentPRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI vs CA G.R. No. 114508 November 19, 1999.docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentAmerican Wire vs Director of Patents G.R. No. L-26557 February 18, 1970téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentInchausti & Company v. Song Fo & Company, G.R. No. 6623 (January 26, 1912)téléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCOFFEE PARTNERS, INC. v. SAN FRANCISCO COFFEE AND ROASTERY, INC., G.R. NO. 169504, March 3, 2010 .docxtéléversé parEmil Bautista
- DocumentCoffee Partners, Inc. v. San Francisco Coffee and Roastery, Inc., g.r. No. 169504, March 3, 2010téléversé parEmil Bautista