![0% sur 47. [Terms and Conditions] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012 terminé](https://s-f.scribdassets.com/images/progress/bar.png?88e64cd69)
Document47. [Terms and Conditions] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012téléversé par
Jude Raphael S. Fanila- DocumentPERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document41 . [Illegal Recruitment - Prohibited Practices] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document98. [Effects on Benefits] Davao Fruits Corporation v. Associated Labor Uniontéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document18. Valenzuela v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document18 San Miguel v. Judge Macedatéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document41. [Illegal Recruitment - Prohibited Practices] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentComelec v. Aguirretéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document65 - Buenaventura v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentShaffer v Heitnertéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentSuperlines Transportation Co. Inc. v. Philippine National Construction Co (2007)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document135. [Anti-Sexual Harassment, RA 7877] Philippine Aelous Automotive United Corp. v. NLRC (2000)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document23. Carpo v. Chua & Dy Ngtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document15 Lagon v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentRodriguez v. People (2012)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentBerkenkotter v. Cu Unjieng (1935)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentMerciales v. CA (2002)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document292. [Separation Pay - Legal Termination Due to Authorized Causes] National Federation of Labor v. Court of Appeals, 440 SCRA 604 (2004téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentCalalas v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentLao v. Heirs of Alburotéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document5. - Director of Lands v. IACtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentPeople v. Ortizatéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document11 Coscolluela v. Sandiganbayantéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document10 Gonzales v. Peopletéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentProperty Digeststéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document8 People v. Garciatéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentValenzuela v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document19 Nacar v. Gallery Framestéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document98. [Effects on Benefits] Davao Fruits Corporation v. Associated Labor Uniontéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentComelec v. CA (1994)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document172. [Probationary Employee - Extension of Contract] Ma. Carmela Umali v. Hobbying Solutions, Inctéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document210. [Termination of Employment by Employer – Abandonment] EG & Const. Corp. & Galeos v. Sato, Et Altéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentCaltex v. Board of Assesments (1982)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentTan Toco v. Municipal Council of Iloilo (1926)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentInfante v Arantéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document4 - Malago v. Panachostéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentVinzons-Chato v. Fortunetéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document135. [Anti-Sexual Harassment, RA 7877] Philippine Aelous Automotive United Corp. v. NLRC (2000)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document10 Co v. Limtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentDirector v. IACtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document292. [Separation Pay - Legal Termination Due to Authorized Causes] National Federation of Labor v. Court of Appeals, 440 SCRA 604 (2004téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document15 Lagon v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentLao v. Heirs of Alburotéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- DocumentIvler v. Judge San Pedro (2010)téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document114. Agricultural & Home Extension v. CAtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document[Management Prerogative - Private Sector]University of Immaculate Concepcion Inc v. Sec of Labor, UICtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document23. Carpo v. Chua & Dy Ngtéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document97. Asset Privatization Trust v. T.J. Enterprises.téléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
- Document11 Expert Travel v. CA, G.R. No. 130030, 25 June 1999 - Tortstéléversé parJude Raphael S. Fanila
Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
![47. [Terms and Conditions] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646787/149x198/dc486f60e5/1614687580?v=1)
![41 . [Illegal Recruitment - Prohibited Practices] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012](https://imgv2-2-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646785/149x198/dd419b0ca8/1614687579?v=1)
![98. [Effects on Benefits] Davao Fruits Corporation v. Associated Labor Union](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646782/149x198/526b8526cf/1614687579?v=1)
![41. [Illegal Recruitment - Prohibited Practices] PERT CPM Manpower Exponent Co vs Vinuya - 2012](https://imgv2-2-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646784/149x198/1d308140f2/1614687579?v=1)
![135. [Anti-Sexual Harassment, RA 7877] Philippine Aelous Automotive United Corp. v. NLRC (2000)](https://imgv2-2-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646777/149x198/2cd7022fc5/1614687577?v=1)
![292. [Separation Pay - Legal Termination Due to Authorized Causes] National Federation of Labor v. Court of Appeals, 440 SCRA 604 (2004](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646773/149x198/1100ccb833/1614687577?v=1)
![98. [Effects on Benefits] Davao Fruits Corporation v. Associated Labor Union](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646757/149x198/e769d8082f/1614687836?v=1)
![172. [Probationary Employee - Extension of Contract] Ma. Carmela Umali v. Hobbying Solutions, Inc](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646772/149x198/4f840eb018/1614687583?v=1)
![210. [Termination of Employment by Employer – Abandonment] EG & Const. Corp. & Galeos v. Sato, Et Al](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646729/149x198/034e2748a0/1614687576?v=1)
![135. [Anti-Sexual Harassment, RA 7877] Philippine Aelous Automotive United Corp. v. NLRC (2000)](https://imgv2-1-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646746/149x198/9294c2715e/1614687577?v=1)
![292. [Separation Pay - Legal Termination Due to Authorized Causes] National Federation of Labor v. Court of Appeals, 440 SCRA 604 (2004](https://imgv2-2-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646731/149x198/f6c5893d4d/1614687576?v=1)
![[Management Prerogative - Private Sector]University of Immaculate Concepcion Inc v. Sec of Labor, UIC](https://imgv2-2-f.scribdassets.com/img/document/496646727/149x198/e292e6e0e3/1614687576?v=1)
