- DocumentWaller v. City of New York, Order by Justice Michael Stallman Denying OSW Petititioners Extension for Temporary Restraining Order, Case No. 112957-2011 (N.Y. County Supr. Ct. Nov. 15, 2011)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentWaller v. City of New York, Temporary Restraining Order by J. Lucy Billings and Plaintiffs Pleading on Order to Show Cause Before J. Michael Stallman, Case No. 112957-2011 (N.Y. County Supr. Ct. Nov. 15, 2011)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentWaller v. City of New York, Affirmation of Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway in Opposition to Temporary Restraining Order, Case No. 112957-2011 (N.Y. County Supr. Ct. Nov. 15, 2011)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentLegal Information Industry Anti Competitive and Unfair Business Practicestéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentAALL Executive Board Agenda March 25-26, ,2011téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentAALL Executive Board Agenda July 21-22,2011téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentFlorida Attorney General Negotiates Settlement With Publishing Company, LexisNexistéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentThomson Settlement Agreement With Florida AG Re Automatic Update Programtéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentHave Law Libraries Found Opportunities to Save Money Due to Soaring Costs of Print Legal Subscriptionstéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPending Legislation Related to Same Sex Couples Updated 05-15-10téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentBenson v. Alverson, Complaint, No. ____ (Minn. Hennepin County Dist. Ct. May 7, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentLegal Scholarship on Same Sex Marriage Update 05-14-10téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentTulsa County District Attorney's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of ADF Attorneys in Bishop v. USA (N.D.ok. Mar. 23, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentOpposition to Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of ADF Attorneys in Bishop v. USA (N.D.ok. Mar. 23, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentProcedural History of Jackson v. Dist. Columbia Bd. Elections, On Marriage Initiativetéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v Schwarzenneger News and Commentary 05-01-10 Updatetéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentCole v. Arkansas Dept of Human Services Et Al, Slip. Op., No 60CV-08-14284 (Ak. Pulaski Circuit Court Apr. 16, 2010)PDFtéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentIn the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., Appellee Brief, No. 05-09-01170-CV (TX. Ct. App. 5th Dist. Feb. 8, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentIn the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., Brief of the State of Texas, No. 05-09-01170-CV (TX. Ct. App. 5th Dist. Jan. 12, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentSelected Filings in Perry v Schwarzenegger 4-17-10 Updatetéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Scharzenneger Exhibits to Prop. 8 Proponents' Response to April 13, 2010, Order to Show Cause Why Record of Evidence Should Not Be Closed, And Motion for Contempt, No. 09-Cv-2292 (N.D.cal. Apr. 16, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Scharzenneger Prop. 8 Proponents' Response to April 13, 2010, Order to Show Cause Why Record of Evidence Should Not Be Closed, And Motion for Contempt, No. 09-Cv-2292 (N.D.cal. Apr. 16, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentDragovich v. U.S. Dept. Treasury, Complaint, No. 10-Cv-01564 (N.D.cal. Apr. 13, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Schwarzenneger Order to Show Cause Re Closing of Evidentiary Record, No. 09-Cv-02292 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 13, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Schwarzenneger Plaintiffs-Appellees Brief, No. 10-15649 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Schwarzenneger Opening Brief by Appellees Prop. 8 Proponents, No. 10-15649 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Schwarzenneger Opening Brief by Appellants Equality California Et Al., No. 10-15649 (9th Cir. Apr. 9, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Schwarzenneger Amicus Brief by Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, No. 09-Cv-02292 (N.D.cal. Jan. 29, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Schwarzenneger Amicus Brief by National Organization for Mariage, No. 09-Cv-02292 (N.D.cal. Jan. 8, 2010)PDFtéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentKern v. Taney, slip, op., No. 09-10738 (Pa. Berks County Ct. Com. Pl. Mar. 15, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Scharzenneger, Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Motion for Expedited Appeal, No. 10-15649 (9th Cir. Mar,. 25, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentPerry v. Scharzenneger Order on Briefing Schedule, No. 10-15649 (9th Cir. Mar,. 31, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentOrder by Judge Walker Granting Motion to Stay Judge Spero's Discovery Order Until Mar. 29, 2010, No. 09-Cv-02292 (N.D.cal. Mar. 23, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentMotion to Stay Discovery Order of Magistrate Judge Spero, No. 09-Cv-02292 (N.D.cal. Mar. 23, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentOrder by Judge Walker Upholding Judge Spero Discovery Order, Filed 03-22-10 in Perry v. Schwarzennegertéléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentKaren Golinski - Reply Brief ISO Preliminary Injunction, Filed 3-19-10téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentC. O'Darling v. S. O'Darling, No. 106732, Slip. Op. (Okl. Ct. Civ. App., Div. I, Mar. 11, 2010)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentTestimony of ADF Senior Counsel Jordan Lorence on Marriage Protection Amendment, WV Legislature, 07-14-09téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentGay and Lesbian Activists Alliance Forum Witness List for 01-27-10 Hearing by D.C. Bd. Elections & Ethics Re Proposed Referendum on the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentCongressional Amicus Brief, Jan. 5, 2010, Jackson v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections, Civ. No. 2009 CA 008613 B, (D.C. Super. Ct.)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentMotion to Dismiss Petition, Dec. 18, 2009, Jackson v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections, Civ. No. 2009 CA 008613 B, (D.C. Super. Ct.)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentIn Re Marriage Initiative of 2009 (D.C. Bd. Elections & Ethics, 11-17-09)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentProposed Referendum Concerning the Jury and Marriage Amendment Act of 2009, Filed 05-27-09 (D.C Bd. Elections & Ethics)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentJackson v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections, Civ. No. 2009 CA 008613 B, Petition for Review of Decision by D.C. Bd. Elections & Ethics and Writ of Mandamus (D.C. Super. Ct., 11-18-09)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentAlliance Defense Fund Attorneys and Foley & Lardner Attorney Clara Mitchell Counsel for Referendum Proponents, Supplemental Letter, Re Proposed Referendum on the Religious and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009 (01!29!10)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentBarry C. Knestout, For Archdiocese of Washington Re Comments Re Proposed Referendum on the Religious and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009 (01!22!10)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentOffice of the General Counsel, D.C. Council Re Comments Re Proposed Referendum on the Religious and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009 (01!22!10)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentOPM Opposition Brief in Golinsky v. OPM, No. 10-00257 (N.D.Cal. 03-12-10)téléversé parMichael Ginsborg
- DocumentItem 8A, Discussion of Domestic Partner Benefits, Kissimmee City Commission Agenda 03-09-10téléversé parMichael Ginsborg