Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SafetyRegular Airlines
Timeliness
Convenience of booking
Sub Indian Airlines
Jet Airways
Air Sahara
Air IndiaOther (asIndian
specified
Airlines
Jetearlier)
Airways
Air Sahara
Air IndiaOther (asIndian
specified
Airlines
Jetearlier)
Airways
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
7
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
9
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
10
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
12
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
13
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
16
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
17
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
18
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
19
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
20
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
21
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
22
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
23
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
25
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
26
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
27
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
TOT
12
16
2
6
1
3
19
2
1
2
8
19
FREQUENCY TABLE
Ind Air
safe
12
timely
3
booking
8
service
4
frequency
8
look
3
38
36
25
39
34
27
30
191
Coordinates of the points-columns:
0.48
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
Air Ind
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.02
-0.09
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.17
F1
F2
0.438 -0.094
-0.221 -0.024
0.170 0.476
0.187 -0.174
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.02
-0.09
-0.1
-0.17
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
F1
safe
0.326
timely
-0.348
booking 0.133
service -0.181
frequency 0.286
look
-0.326
0.48
0.4
0.3
0.28
0.2
0.1
0.07
0.01
-0.02
-0.06
-0.07
-0.1
-0.09
Column F
Column H
Column J
-0.17
-0.2
-0.25
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Cluster centroids:
Cluster Cluster1Cluster2Cluster3Cluster4
Indian Airlines 5.000 4.333 3.778 5.667
Jet Airways 4.500 4.889 6.111 6.333
Air Sahara 4.250 3.889 4.556 5.167
Air India 2.250 5.000 3.556 4.333
Vectors:
Preference Map
0.5
Column F1
Length
F2
of the vector
Cluster1 0.273 1.249 1.278
Cluster2 -0.929 -1.512 1.775
Cluster3 -3.736 0.657 3.793
Cluster4 -1.410 0.049 1.411
The p-values are those of the ANOVA significanc
No p-values equal or lower to the significance lev
0.43
0.4
0.3
0.2
-- axis F2 -->
0.1
0.07
0.04
0
-0.07
-0.1
-0.14
-0.2
-0.22
-0.3
-0.37
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
-- axis F1 -->
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-- axis F2
0
-0.07
-0.1
-0.14
-0.2
-0.22
-0.3
-0.37
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
-- axis F1 -->
Obj1
Obj2
Obj3
Obj4
Cluster1Cluster2Cluster3Cluster4
3
2
1
1
2
4
4
4
4
1
3
3
1
3
2
2
Preference orders:
Cluster1: Obj3 > Obj1 > Obj2 > Obj4
Cluster2: Obj2 > Obj4 > Obj1 > Obj3
Cluster3: Obj2 > Obj3 > Obj4 > Obj1
Cluster4: Obj2 > Obj3 > Obj4 > Obj1
Composition of the clusters:
Cluster
Within
Size
1
2
3
4
6.500 15.778 18.889 10.833
4
9
9
6
L2
L3
L4
L1
L5
L8
L6
L11
L7
L15
L9
L13
L23
L17
L10
L14
L18
L12
L27
L19
L16
L28
L21
L20
L22
L24
L26
L25
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Convenience of booking
In-flight service
Frequency
Air Sahara
Air IndiaOther (asIndian
specified
Airlines
Jetearlier)
Airways
Air Sahara
Air IndiaOther (asIndian
specified
Airlines
Jetearlier)
Airways
Air Sahara
Air IndiaOther (as specified ea
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
4
4
4
22
3
5
1
8
12
4
3
3
oints-columns:
p-value
0.952
0.269
0.427
0.890
se of the ANOVA significance test
lower to the significance level
Contingency table:
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
Ind Air
12
3
8
4
8
3
Jet
Sahara
16
19
19
22
12
22
Air Ind
2
2
8
3
4
2
6
1
4
5
3
3
Conclusion:
At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of independence between th
In other words, the dependence between the rows and the columns is not significant.
F2
0.030
27.265
93.166
F3
0.008
6.834
100.000
Eigenvalues
0.080
0.070
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.040
2
0.030
0.020
0.010
0.000
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
Weight Distance d
0.188
0.413
0.131
0.384
0.204
0.312
0.178
0.235
0.141
0.302
0.157
0.334
d
0.171
0.147
0.098
0.055
0.091
0.111
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
F1
0.326
-0.348
0.133
-0.181
0.286
-0.326
F2
-0.254
0.011
0.281
-0.057
0.074
-0.071
F3
-0.012
-0.161
0.031
0.138
-0.064
0.009
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
F1
1.200
-1.284
0.492
-0.668
1.053
-1.202
F2
-1.457
0.062
1.610
-0.326
0.422
-0.407
F3
-0.139
-1.848
0.360
1.583
-0.728
0.100
F2
0.012
0.000
0.016
0.001
0.001
0.001
F3
0.000
0.003
0.000
0.003
0.001
0.000
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
F1
0.020
0.016
0.004
0.006
0.012
0.017
F2
F3
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
27.16
21.58
4.95
7.94
15.69
22.68
40.02
0.05
52.92
1.89
2.52
2.60
0.36
44.71
2.65
44.62
7.49
0.16
safe
timely
booking
service
frequency
look
F2
0.378
0.001
0.807
0.059
0.060
0.045
F3
0.001
0.177
0.010
0.347
0.044
0.001
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
Air Ind
Weight Distance d
0.199
0.457
0.576
0.223
0.110
0.507
0.115
0.335
d
0.209
0.050
0.257
0.112
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
Air Ind
F2
-0.094
-0.024
0.476
-0.174
F3
-0.093
-0.020
0.045
0.218
0.48
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.02
-0.09
-0.1
-0.17
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.1
0
-0.02
-0.09
-0.1
-0.17
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.48
0.4
0.3
0.28
0.2
0.1
0.07
0.01
-0.07
-0.1
-0.02
-0.06
-0.09
-0.17
-0.2
-0.25
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
Air Ind
F1
1.615
-0.816
0.628
0.688
F2
-0.538
-0.135
2.727
-0.997
F3
-1.062
-0.230
0.516
2.493
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
F1
0.038
0.028
0.003
F2
0.002
0.000
0.025
F3
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.3
0.4
0.5
Column F
Column H
Column J
Air Ind
0.004
0.003
0.005
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
Air Ind
F1
51.90
38.30
4.34
5.45
F2
5.76
1.05
81.74
11.44
F3
22.44
3.05
2.92
71.59
Ind Air
Jet
Sahara
Air Ind
F1
0.917
0.981
0.113
0.310
F2
0.042
0.011
0.879
0.269
F3
0.041
0.008
0.008
0.422
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
Weight
28.000
15.000
13.000
9.000
9.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
4.000
7.000
4.000
2.000
3.000
3.000
3.000
4.000
2.000
3.000
3.000
4.000
2.000
2.000
2.000
2.000
3.000
2.000
2.000
Level
26.133
17.414
15.217
8.431
6.430
4.981
4.931
4.473
3.335
3.272
2.318
2.071
2.069
1.865
1.607
1.486
1.129
0.986
0.986
0.914
0.610
0.519
0.519
0.304
0.000
0.000
0.000
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Dissimilarity
De
nd
ro
gra
m
3
0
2
5
2
0
1
5
Dissimilarity
1
0
L7
L2
L5
L3
L8
L9
L16 L10
L10 L20
L6
L24
L4
L1
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
Weight
28.000
15.000
13.000
9.000
9.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
4.000
7.000
4.000
2.000
3.000
3.000
3.000
4.000
2.000
3.000
3.000
4.000
2.000
2.000
2.000
2.000
3.000
2.000
2.000
Level
26.133
17.414
15.217
8.431
6.430
4.981
4.931
4.473
3.335
3.272
2.318
2.071
2.069
1.865
1.607
1.486
1.129
0.986
0.986
0.914
0.610
0.519
0.519
0.304
0.000
0.000
0.000
10
15
20
25
30
10
15
20
25
30
Dissimilarity
De
nd
ro
gra
m
3
0
2
5
2
0
1
5
Dissimilarity
1
0
L7
L2
L5
L3
L8
L9
L16 L10
Dendrogram truncation:
Level of troncature of the partition in 4 clusters:
11.824
De
nd
ro
gra
m
2
3
2
1
1
9
1
7
Dissimilarity
1
5
1
3
1
1
Cluster 1
Dispersion decomposition:
Inertia
Value
Within-groups 52.000
Between-groups
58.786
Total
110.786
Cluster 2
L16 L10
Cluster centroids:
Cluster Indian Airlines
Jet AirwaysAir Sahara Air India
Cluster1
5.000
4.500
4.250
2.250
Cluster2
4.333
4.889
3.889
5.000
Cluster3
3.778
6.111
4.556
3.556
Cluster4
5.667
6.333
5.167
4.333
Central observations:
Cluster Indian Airlines
Jet AirwaysAir Sahara Air India
Cluster1 (L5)
5.000
5.000
4.000
2.000
Cluster2 (L21) 4.000
5.000
3.000
5.000
Cluster3 (L20) 4.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
Cluster4 (L11) 5.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
1
6.500
4
L2
L5
L7
L23
Clusters of rows:
Row
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
Cluster
4
1
2
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
4
2
15.778
9
L3
L8
L15
L17
L18
L19
L21
L22
L26
3
18.889
9
L4
L6
L9
L10
L12
L16
L20
L24
L25
4
10.833
6
L1
L11
L13
L14
L27
L28
L12
3
L13
4
L14
4
L15
2
L16
3
L17
2
L18
2
L19
2
L20
3
L21
2
L22
2
L23
1
L24
3
L25
3
L26
2
L27
4
L28
4
In bold, nearest observation from its cluster centroid
L10 L20
L6
L24
L4
L1
L10 L20
L24
Cluster 3
Cluster 4
Vector model:
Y = const + sum(aiXi)
Regression Coefficients:
Column
Cluster1
Cluster2
Cluster3
Cluster4
Vectors:
Column
F1
F2Length of the vector
p-value
Cluster1
0.273
1.249
1.278
0.952
Cluster2
-0.929
-1.512
1.775
0.269
Cluster3
-3.736
0.657
3.793
0.427
Cluster4
-1.410
0.049
1.411
0.890
The p-values are those of the ANOVA significance test
No p-values equal or lower to the significance level
Preference Map
0.5
0.43
0.4
0.3
0.2
xis F2 -->
0.1
0.07
0
0
-0.07
0.04
i = 1 to 2
Preference Map
0.5
0.43
0.4
0.3
0.2
-- axis F2 -->
0.1
0.07
0.04
0
-0.07
-0.1
-0.14
-0.2
-0.22
-0.3
-0.37
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
-- axis F1 -->
Scores:
Obj1
Obj2
Obj3
Obj4
Preference scores:
Obj1
Obj2
Obj3
Obj4
Obj1
Obj2
Obj3
Obj4
0.5
Obj1
Obj2
Obj4
Obj4
Obj1
Obj3
Obj3
Obj4
Obj1
Preference orders:
Cluster1: Obj3 > Obj1 > Obj2 > Obj4
Cluster2: Obj2 > Obj4 > Obj1 > Obj3
Cluster3: Obj2 > Obj3 > Obj4 > Obj1
Cluster4: Obj2 > Obj3 > Obj4 > Obj1
Obj3
Obj4
Obj1