GABRIEL INDIA LTD SANAND MSA-4

GAUGE R& R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE - DATA SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1

PART NAME : INNER TUBE DESCRIPTION : Total Height SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIH01/SIH01

DATE : 7/16/2022 SPECIFICATION : 288.2/288.8 (MM) OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME HEIGHT GAUGE

PERFORMED BY PRIYANKA TOLRANCE: 0.400 TRIALS 3.0 TV= = Tolerance /6

0.0667
SL. APPRAISER TRIAL # PART SERIAL NUMBER
No. NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE
1 ISHWAR 288.41 288.46 288.54 288.46 288.51 288.55 288.54 288.52 288.56 288.53 288.508
2 ANKIT 1 288.43 288.48 288.52 288.46 288.53 288.56 288.53 288.55 288.53 288.55 288.514
3 ROHIT 288.41 288.47 288.54 288.46 288.52 288.55 288.54 288.48 288.56 288.55 288.508
4 Average 288.417 288.470 288.533 288.460 288.520 288.553 288.537 288.517 288.550 288.543 288.510 Xa
5 UCL x 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528
6 LCL x 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488
7 Range 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.000 0.020 0.010 0.010 0.070 0.030 0.020 0.022 Ra
8 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
9 ISHWAR 288.40 288.47 288.53 288.44 288.50 288.55 288.55 288.51 288.54 288.50 288.499
10 ANKIT 2 288.41 288.48 288.52 288.46 288.53 288.53 288.55 288.53 288.53 288.55 288.509
11 ROHIT 288.40 288.48 288.54 288.46 288.51 288.56 288.54 288.52 288.52 288.54 288.507
12 Average 288.403 288.477 288.530 288.453 288.513 288.547 288.547 288.520 288.530 288.530 288.505 Xb
13 UCL x 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528
14 LCL x 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488
15 Range 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.030 0.030 0.010 0.020 0.020 0.050 0.022 Rb
16 NAME 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 AVERAGE
17 ISHWAR 288.40 288.47 288.54 288.46 288.51 288.55 288.54 288.53 288.53 288.53 288.506
18 ANKIT 3 288.41 288.48 288.52 288.46 288.52 288.55 288.52 288.54 288.53 288.54 288.507
19 ROHIT 288.43 288.47 288.53 288.46 288.52 288.55 288.52 288.56 288.56 288.54 288.514
20 Average 288.413 288.473 288.530 288.460 288.517 288.550 288.527 288.543 288.540 288.537 288.509 Xc
21 UCL x 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528 288.528
22 LCL x 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488 288.488
23 Range 0.030 0.010 0.020 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.020 0.030 0.030 0.010 0.016 Rc
24 Part 288.5080 Xabc
25 Average Xp 288.411 288.473 288.531 288.458 288.517 288.550 288.537 288.527 288.540 288.537 0.1389 Rp
26 0.0200 Rabc
27 0.0050 Xdiff.

28 Upper Control Limit for range UCLR = Rabc x D4= ( note= D4 is 3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials ) 0.0516 UCLR

29 Lower Control Limit for range LCLR = Rabc x D3= (note= D3 = 0 for upto 7 trials.) 0.0000 LCLR

30 Upper Control Limit for Averages UCLx = Xabc + A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 288.5285 UCLx

31 Lower Control Limit for Averages LCLx = Xabc - A2 x Average R= (note= A2 = 1.023 for 3 trials.) 288.4875 LCLx
NOTE :
.- Plot Range Chart & Average Chart to ensure the adequacy of Measurement System. ADEQUACY : Each range should be within UCL. And in case of X Bar chart - minimume 50% of
X Bar chart should be outside the control limits.
.- The number of distinct Data categories should be equal or more than 5, then only the Measurement System can be declared as acceptable for the analysis of the process.
.- UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct, Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit
as originally used or discard values and reaverage and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations.

* If the instrument /gageis required to be used for the process capability study then select the components within process variation for GR&R study. Simillarly select the components within

tolerance if the instrument / gage is required to be used in final inspection or process control.
G4Q059/0119
 MSA-4

GAUGE R&R STUDY AVERAGE AND RANGE METHOD BASED ON TOLERANCE-CALCULATION AND REPORT PAGE 1 OF 2

PART NAME : INNER TUBE DESCRIPTION : Total Height SAMPLE 10 GAUGE NO : FIH01/SIH01

DATE : 7/16/2022 SPECIFICATION : 288.2/288.8 (MM) OPERATOR 3 GAUGE NAME HEIGHT GAUGE

PERFORMED BY PRIYANKA TOLRANCE: 0.400 TRIALS 3

From data sheet Rabc= 0.02000 X diff = 0.00500 Tolerance = This should be equal or
0.0667
more than 5

MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS % TOTAL TOLERANCE

Repeatability i.e. Equipment Variation (EV) % EV= 100 [EV/TV]

EV = Rabc X K1 = 17.7
= 0.0118160000000083 Trials K1
2 0.8862
3 0.5908
Reproducability I.e.Appraiser Variation (AV) % AV= 100[AV/TV]
Appraisers 2 3 = 4.2016
AV = [ (Xdiff x K2)2 - ( EV2 / nr ) ] K2 0.7071 0.5231
n= Number of parts
Xdiff x K2= 0.00353549999999678 EV 0.011816 r = Number of trials
(Xdiff x K2)2= 0.000012 EV2/nr = 0.000005
(Xdiff x K2)2 -(EV2/nr)= 0.000008
AV= 0.00280104118438794
Repeatability & Reproducability (R & R) % R & R= 100[R&R/TV]
18.2
R & R= ( EV2+ AV2) EV2 0.0001396 Note: Accept if < 10%
AV2 0.0000078 Accept on Deviation
R & R= 0.0121 R & R2 0.000147 if >10% and <30%
No.of distinct data
categories
NOTE : PV, TV , & % ge of PV are not applicable since the analysis = 1.41*(PV/R&R)
is based on Tolerance. = 7.7
Since PV = TV

Remarks:
Acceptable
Accepted On Deviation.
Not Acceptable

G4Q059/0119 Sign. :
Guidelines for acceptance of gauge repeatability and reproducability (% R & R) MSA-4

1.Under 10 % error = The measurement system is acceptable. PAGE 1 OF 3

2.10 % to 30 % error = may be acceptable based upon importance of application,cost of gauge,

3.Cost of repairs etc.Over 30 % error= measurement system needs improvement.

Make every effort to identify the problems and have them corrected.

Points for justification to accept the gauge under deviation : ( Tick mark the reason and provide data if applicable)

1 Gauge application is not much important as automatic correction exists.

2 Cost of replacing the gauge is too high.

3 Cost of repairing the gauge is too high.

4 Process Capability is more than 2.5, hence R & R % (10-30%) can be considered as acceptable

on deviation

If R&R% is equal or more than 30% then following analysis to be carried out and
and to have the action plan to get R&R within acceptable limit.

case I If repeatability is comparatively higher than reproducabililty, identify causes related to instrument / equipment

a) The instrument may need maintenance

b) The Gauge may have to be redesigned to be more rigid

c) Clamping or location for gauging needs to be improved.

case II If reproducability is comparatively higher than repeatability, use graphical method and identify following causes

a) The appraiser needs to be better trained in how to use and read the gauge / instrument.

b) Calibrations on the gauge dial are not clear.

c) Fixture of some sort may be needed to help the appraiser use the gauge more consistently.

G4Q059/0119
 RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 1
Range
0.0800
0.0700
0.0600
0.0500
0.0400
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 2

0.0600
Range

0.0500

0.0400

0.0300

0.0200

0.0100

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

RANGE CHART - APPRAISER 3

0.0600
Range

0.0500

0.0400

0.0300

0.0200

0.0100

0.0000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Serial Number

Guideline
If all the individual ranges are within control limits, all appraisers are consistent and
are using the gauge in the same ways.

Conclusion Acceptable
Guideline for analysis of Average Chart :
The area within the control limits represents the measurement discrimination ("noise"). Since the group of parts used in the study represents the process variation,
approximately one half or more of the averages should fall outside the control limits. If the data shows this pattern, then the measurement system should be
considered adequate to detect part to part variation and measurement system can provide useful information for analyzing and controlling the process. If less than
half fall out side the limit , then either the measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.

Conclusion : The percentage of points beyond the control limits = 0% So gage is adequate.

The measurement system has inadequate discrimination or the sample does not represent the expected process variation.
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 1

288.600
288.550
Average
288.500
UCL x
288.450
LCL x
288.400
288.350
288.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component number

AVERAGE CHART FOR APPRAISER 2 & 3 Page No. : 02 of 02

A ve ra ge R ea d in gs

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 2

288.600
288.550 Average
288.500 UCL x
288.450
LCL x
288.400
288.350
288.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component No.s
Average Readings

AVERAGE CHART FOR THE APPRAISER 3

288.600
288.550 Average
288.500 UCL x
288.450 LCL x
288.400
288.350
288.300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Component Number