Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
:
:
2015-2009
: :
/
/
2016 /2015 :
.
.
.
.
.
" "
.
...
:
. :
In the new economy of the knowledge economy and digital technology, there is a
growing, emerging technology, communications that contribute greatly to the training
and innovation of new ideas. In this context the concept of technology and
information system was created to improve the Securities markets. That is why our
problem is considering would highlight the importance of digital system for the
Securities markets to a digital markets is committed to a healthy development, an
innovative and creative wealth.
I ..........................................................................................
II ...........................................................................................
III ..................................................................................
V ................................................................................
VII ..............................................................
- .
1 :
2 ...............................................................................
3 ................................................... :
3 ....................................................... :
6 ................................... :
10 ..................................................... :
16 .................................. :
16 .......................... :
18 ................ :
:
23 .............................................................................................
27 .............. :
27 ........................ :
30 ............................... :
33 ......... :
36 ...................................................................
37 :
38 ...............................................................................
39 .................. :
39 .............. :
43 ....................................... :
48 ................... :
V
:
52 ......................... :
52 ...................................... :
57 .................................. :
59 .......................... var :
:
.................................................var
65
65 ............................................ :
67
.................................................................. :
73 ..........................................................var :
82 ..................................................................
84 .
90
96
VI
:
: .
10 01
44 02
2015-2009
54 . 03
57 04
57 . 05
67 06
67 07
68 . 08
69 . 09
70 . 10
70 . 11
71 . 12
71 . 13
71 . 14
72 . 15
72 . 16
73 17
73 18
74 adf itc 19
74 adf vm 20
74 VT adf 21
75 .Rm adf 22
75 .Rm wald 23
76 .Rm 24
76 .Rm wald 25
76 .Rm 26
77 .Im adf 27
77 itc adf 28
78 .ITC wald 29
78 .ITC 30
78 .ITC wald 31
79 .ITC 32
79 .Im 33
80 . Im 34
: .
15 01
22 02
54 03
56 04
: .
. 01
. 02
. 03
. 04
. 05
. 06
. 07
. 08
. 09
itc adf 10
.vm adf 11
.VT adf 12
.Rm adf 13
.Im adf 14
.ITC adf 15
.ITC adf 16
RM VT VM 17
im 18
:
.
.
:
:
:
:
:
.
( )
.
.
: :
:
.
:
.
( )
.
: :
.
:
.
Eviews.8 Microsoft Excel
:
"
"
.
"
"
var
. 2015-2009
: :
:
2010-2009:
2013/2012 " "
2010 2009
5%
.
2010 2009
.
: “
( )
“2009/2001
: 2011/2010 " "
.
: :
:
27 :
-
2015-2009 :
: :
.
.
:
:
.
. :
. :
:
:
.
:
. :
. :
:
.
2
:
.
:
. :
. :
. :
:
.TI
Technology : .I
Logos Logy Techno
1
.
Technologie
2
.
4 3
.331 : 2003
2
.23 : 2009
3
.24: 2004
4
Robert Reix,système d’information et management des organisation,libraire Vuibert,Paris France, 1995, p : 58.
3
:
1
.
2
.
.
: : .II
»
:
3 «
.
»
(OCDE) :
4 «
.
»
:
5 «
.
»
:
18-17 ( )
.702: 2006
2
: 2004 15-14 ( ) - –
. 272
3
2009
.52:
4
.26 : 2009 7 ( )
4
:
1 «
.
.
: .III
1
Daniel Salgado Lemos,technologie de l’information et de la communication coordination des réseaux pour le
développement durable des zones enclavées ,thèse en master of science du Siham,nstitue agronomique méditerranéen
de Montpelier, n° 59, juillet, 2001, p :56.
5
:
:
1
:
.
. .I
2
:
2011 ( )
. 74-73: :
2
2005 9-8 ( )
.320 :
6
:
1
.
: .II
...
7
:
)
1
( ...
( ... )
( )
( )
( )
1
-
- -
.30-29: : 2014-2013 ( )
8
:
)
( ...
1
.
: .III
:(01)
.1 .1
.
.
.2 .2
. .
.3 .3
. .
.4 .4
. . ...
.28 27 : 2013 ( )
9
:
.5 .5
.
.
. .6 .6
.
.7 .7
. .
.66-65: : : :
. :
1
:
:( ) .I
.
: .II
2
.
3
:
1
–
: : 02 ( ) – ( )
.21 15
2
- -
. 100: 2010
3
. 109 : 2008
10
:
:
.
:
.
: .III
1
. ( )
2
.
"
3
.
:
: .I
(IP/TCP)
4
. ...
1
.91 : 2000 - -
2
.141: 2006
3
.384:
4
2004
.309 :
11
:
1
:
.
.
.
.
: .II
( )
2
.
:
1
.18-19: :
2
.309:
12
:
: .III
'' '' » :
2 1
." ": .«
. ( )
3
.
:
:
1
DML"
( ) "
.47 : 2006/2005
2
.293: 2004
3
. 23 : 2007
13
:
1
.
:
2
.
: .IV
3
:
: .V
"
1
.41 : 2005
2
.24 :
3
.22-21: :
14
:
1
."
"
.
:
:(01)
:
:
.21: 2014 :
1
118:
15
:
:
. :
. :
:
.
.
1
:
16
:
:( ) .I
.
: .II
.
: .III
.
2003 : .IV
.
: .V
.
: .VI
1
.
1
–
.184: 2010 -2009 07 -
17
:
1
.
2
:
1
.02:
2
)
. 326-327 : : 2010 ( ) 85 (
18
:
: .I
1
.
1
- -
-2012 ( )
. 108-107 : : 2013
19
:
...
.
1
.
1
: 2005 :
. 277
20
:
.
: .II
1
1
. 110-109 : :
21
:
:(02)
2001 :
.35:
22
:
:
.
.
: .I
1
:
.
.
.
.
.
( )
. 13-12 : : 2013 ( ) 75
23
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
.
.
: ( ) .II
.
:
.1
.
24
:
.2
.
. -3
-4
.( )
-5
.
. -6
:
:
:
. .
. .
. .
. .
:
.
:
. .
. .
. .
. .
. ( ) .
:
:
. .
. .
. .
25
:
. .
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
: :
.
( – - - )
26
:
. :
.
:
. :
. :
. :
:
:
: .I
:
. .
. .
.
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
Remote t r a d i n g .
Dual listing.
Multi Mar kets.
27
:
: .II
1
.
.
.
.
: .III
: .1
:
.
.
.
1
:
: "
.7 : 2007 09-08 "
28
:
: .2
:
.
.( )
.( )
.( )
.( )
: .IV
.
29
:
.
:
. .1
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
1
.
. .6
.
.
:
:
:
2
.
1
.8 :
2
.11 :
30
:
:
: .
.
: .
.
: .
.
: .
.
.
.
: .
.
.
: .
.
: .
1
.
: .
.
1
.6-5 : :
31
:
: .
.
:
: .
: .
: .
: .
.
:
1
.
: :
:
. .
. .
1
2009-2000
. 66 : 2012 ( )
32
:
. .
.
:
:
1
:
.2
.
.132 : 1998
33
:
1
:
: : (1
: : (2
: 1998 4
.165
34
:
35
:
36
:
:
( )
:
. :
. :
:
.var
38
:
. :
:
. :
. :
. :
. :
) 16
: ( )
:
1883
1909 1890
1951 329: 1933
1
1971
1997
2
.
:( )
1920 3
1
( )
.43: 2003
2
.70: 2005
39
:
1945
45 1975
1
1995
2
.
1929 :( )
3
1992 1967
4
.
:
1945 1937
1969 28 (13) 1969
. 1989
:
)
1971 (
5
(10 )
.
1
) 5 ( )
.25: 2006 20 (
2
.71:
3
2003
.90:
4
.75:
5
.205: 2009
40
:
:
1984
1
1990 " "
2
. 2001 31
1987 4 :
1989
4
.1999
: ( )
1988 21 88 /53:
1989 20
88 /53 : 98 /80:
6
.
14 1995 :
1997 26 1995
1
.73:
2
.92 -91: :
3
http://www.bahrainbourse.net/bhb/about_us_ar.asp?page=about_us&sec=History :
.2016/04/04 :
4
.103 -102: :
5
.74:
6
http://www.ase.com.jo/ar/%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B5%D8%A9-:
.2016/04/04 %D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86
41
:
1
.
1995 :
%80 " "
1997 18
.
1962 :
1982
1992
1994
2
.
:
2000 4
3
.
:
1988
03-88
08 -93
1993 23 10-93
1
http://www.qe.com.qa/pps/qe/qe%20arabic%20portal/Pages/About%20QE/About%20QE :
.2016/04/04:
2
.77:
3
.2013/03/14 http://esm.sca.ae/Arabic/Pages/AboutESM.aspx:
42
:
1
(cosob)
1997 17
2
.
1999 11 :
.
3
.
:
2006 /55/
.2009/03/10
4
.
. :
(2015 -2009 )
.(01)
43
:
(2015-2009) :(02)
(%) ( ) (%) ( )
-34,51 653457 17,32 903428 2009
-43,11 371700 8,89 983754 2010
8.5 393400 -9,11 894130 2011
58.72 624402 5,18 940490 2012
414,72 533511 20,96 1137700 2013
56,57 835338 5,72 1202890 2014
-87,46 104719 -6,44 1125366 2015
(01) :
:2010-2009
:
: -
2008 903488 %17,32 2009
2010 %8,9 2010 770000
1
2010 983754
2
. %2
%34,5 : -
653,45 2009
997,87
1
.08: 2010 61
2
.142: 2011
44
:
%80
1
.%51
%43 2010
371,7
2
. %53
:(2012-2011 )
:
%10,85 : -
849,13
%42.1 %50,3
%17,3 %18,9
%4 %9 2011
3
. 7
%5.2 940.5 2012
1
.09: 2010 60
.142: 2011 2
3
.12: 2012
4
.155: 2013
45
:
%58.72 2012
624
%78.7
2012 7
1
.%25
(2014-2013)
:
%21 : -
221.8 2013 1138.2 2013
2
.09: 2012 71
3
.18: 2013
46
:
%95.3
%63.6
2
%93.7
. %70.3
(2015)
% 6.44 2015
1125.3 2014
104.7 %87.5
:
: -
2015
1
.147: 2014
2
.17: 2014
47
:
.
. 5.6 6.2 7.1 10.3 92.4
444.5 2015
% 39.5
89.5 95.0 115.6 166.2
.
: -
64.7 104.7 2015
.
. 2015
:
.
. 51.3
.
.1 1.7
94.2 %
.%71.3 .
. :
1
2015
.8:
48
:
: .I
:
: .1
1
:
.
: .2
:
.282 : 2000
49
:
:
.
: .II
.
:
: .1
.
.
.
: .2
.
.
%700
1987 1980
1
.
.18: 2004
50
:
"
1
.
1
Mitchell Conover Jerold R.Jensen Robert R. Johnson ; Emerging markets when are the worth it? fnancial
analaysts journal vol 58 N° 2 Mach -April 2002 p86.
51
:
. :
:
. :
. :
. VAR :
. :
:
. .I
27 SGBV
475200000.00
1997 25 1993 23 10-93
.
.
: .1
BEA BDL :
BNA CPA BADR
.CNEP
CAAR :
CAAT SAA CCR
. CNMA
UB :
: .2
. (BDL)
. (BEA)
52
:
. (BADR)
. (CPA)
. (BNA)
.(CNEP)
: : .3
1
. (COSOB)
15 : .4
/02/ 98 SGBV
.2001 16
(1)
.2001 19
.
." "
2
.
1
2016-04-30 : http://www.sgbv.dz/ar/?page=rubrique&mod=141:
2
.2016-04-30 : http://www.sgbv.dz/ar/?page=rubrique&mod=143
53
:
:(03)
http://www.sgbv.dz/ar/?page=rubrique&mod=144 :
: .5
:
. :(03)
. 5 -
. -
. 20
.
.
.
.
.
. -
. -
. -
. 150 -
. :
54
:
. .II
1997 23
:
: .1
.
:
.
.
.
.
: .2
1999/03/11
.1
:2
-
1
158 2004
2
77 2009
55
:
.
.
.
.
: .3
.23
.1
. :(04)
: .4
1
135 : 2001
56
:
:(04)
. -
. 100 -
. %100 -
. %20 -
. -
. -
. %5 -
. :
. :
:
. :(05)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
( ) 85,7 74,4 94,76 90,31 90,16 91,02 91,5
) 91 106,1 135,6 127,2 124,7 185,13 183,5
(
) 162 161,5 613 279 263,2 225,5 144,8
(
(%) 1,9 2,1 2,1 0 0 0,9 1
(%) 2,52 2,56 2,98 2,83 2,59 2,48 2,59
57
:
.
1
:
:(VM) -1
(... )
2
.
:(RM) -2
.
: Measuring Returns over Multiple Periods
Arithmetic Average
.
Geometric Average
1/ n
GA (1 R1 ) (1 R2 ) (1 R3 ) (1 Rn ) 1
: Weighted Return
Internal Rate of Return
-1
.102-101 : : 2011
2
2000
.20:
58
:
.
:(ITC) -3
1
:
.
.
.
»
:(IM) -4
2 «
. .
:
:
:( )
...
:
.
. VAR :
:
. 1957 FRIEDMAN
.
. LIEU
.
.BOX-JENKINS
45 2009 30 1
2
.110:
59
:
.LUCAS
ECONOMETRICA SIMS VAR
:
.SPECIFICATIONS IDENTIFICATION
FAIR RAY
:
LUCAS
INTRRELATION VAR :VAR
INNOVATIONS DYNAMIC IMPACTS
1
VAR
: VAR
Yt = 10 - 12 Xt + 11 Yt-1 + 12 Xt-1 + yt …………………(1)
{Yt} {Xt }
{ xt } { yt }
{ xt } { yt} { x} { y}
.
(var) (2) (1)
(Xt) (Yt) .
(Yt) (Xt)
(var)
.
(Xt) ( 12)
.(Xt) (Yt-1)
1
James d .hamilton , time series analasis, united kingdom, rpincton university press, 1994, p258.
60
:
(Xt) (Yt)
. ( 21) ( 12)
(Xt) (Yt) ( xt ) ( yt )
(Xt) ( yt ) .
( Yt ) ( xt ) ( 21 0)
.( 12 0)
2 1
.(var)
.
.(var)
1
.
(var)
(var)
.
(liu) (lucas)
.
(var)
:
BZt = 0 + 1Zt-1 +Ut …………..(3)
1 12 10 a11 a12
B=[ ], Zt =[ ], 0 = , 1 =[ ],Ut = [ ]
21 1 20 21 a22
:(var) ( ) (3)
Zt = A0 + AtZt-1 + et (4)
A0 = b-1 0, A1 =B-1 1, et = B-1Ut
:(var(1)) (4)
Yt = 10 + 11Yt-1 + 11Xt-1 + et1 (5)
Xt = 20+ 21Yt-1+ 22Xt-1 + et2 (6)
1
RÉGIS BOURBONNAIS, MICHEL TERRAZA, Analyse des series temporelles en économie.(Paris: presses
universitaires de France, 1er édition, 1999) p 79-80.
61
:
et2 et1 ( xt ) ( yt )
1
.
. et2 et1 6 5
. Xt Yt
. et2 et1
6 5
OLS .
.
: (VAR)
-1
-2
(VAR)
(AIC) :
(SBC)
.
(VAR)
.
VAR
: VAR .
.
.
.GRANGER
1
jACK JOHNSTON, JOHN DINARDO, méthode économétriques, traduit par Bernard Guerrien (Paris : économica
4em édition 1999 ), p 285-294.
62
:
VAR
.
.VAR
.
GRENGER
Yt Xt
Yt-1 Yt Xt
yt Xt
. Yt Xt Yt
var sims :
.
var .
{t-student } .
var
.
.
1
. {t-student }
. var
.
. .
1
Régis bourbonnais, économétrie : cours et exercice courrigé, paris dunod, 3eme édition 2000, p 224-226.
63
:
var
.
.
var
.
F R2 .
.VAR
VAR
.F
. .
. var
64
:
:
.var
.
Excel 2007 Eviews8
.
:
2015-2009
2015-2009
–
-
.
65
:
.I
7 ( 2015-2009)
: .
.VM .1
.VT .2
.IM .3
. RM .4
.ITC .5
: .II
.
:
: .I
(0.04)
(0.86)
(0.45) (-0.093)
(-0.29) (0.18)
(-0.36)
.(-0.0045)
.(0.53)
66
:
:( 06)
ITC RM VT VM IM
: .II
(0.007)
(-0.37)
(0.59) (0.62)
(-0.56) (-0.09)
(-0.67)
.(-0.25) (-0.51)
.(0.94)
:(07 )
IM ITC RM VM VT
. :
67
:
2009
.2015
: -1
:
. (08)
(Y) ( X)
RM= + ITC+ (ITC) (RM)
RM=F(ITC)
VT= + ITC+ (ITC) (VT)
VT=F(ITC)
VM= + ITC+ (ITC) (VM)
VM=F(ITC)
IM= + ITC+ (ITC) (IM)
IM=F(ITC)
. :
Y
: XI
:
:y t
t 210 :
:
: .2
H0 (yi) (xi)
H1.
:
:
68
:
H0 : 0 1 = 2 = ………. k =0.
H1 : i : i 0
:T-student .3
:
: =0
: 0
:
:
% (n-k)
:
| |> -
. | |< -
: .1
RM= + ITC+
:
. :(09)
RM =0.56+0.217ITC
Prob 0.92 0.92
T stat 0.095 0.096
R2 =0.0018 2
R = 0.19 F =0.009 DW = 1.01
eviews8 :
69
:
T STUDENT
2 DW = 1.01 %5
1
.H0 .
:
. :(10)
RM =1.60-0.11ITC
Prob 0.43 0.83
T stat 0.84 - 0.21
R2 =0.009 2
R = -0.18 F =0.04 DW = 0.54
eviews8 :
T STUDENT
2 DW = 0.54 %5
2
.H0 .
: .2
:
VT= + ITC+
:
. :(11)
VT =-1753.47+761.36 ITC
Prob 0.022 0.013
T stat -3.26 3.76
R2 =0.73 2
R = 0.68 F =14.20 DW = 2.99
eviews8 :
ITC %5 T STUDENT
3
.H1 VT ITC
(02) 1
(03) 2
(04) 3
70
:
:
. :(12)
VT =146101.9-37594.11 ITC
Prob 0.08 0.09
T stat 2.15 -2.07
R2 =0.46 2
R = 0.35 F =4.29 DW = 1.40
eviews8 :
1
.H0 ITC %5 T STUDENT
: .3
VM= + ITC+
:
. :(13)
VM =184.60-18.27 ITC
Prob 0.84 0.46
T stat 0.79 -0.20
2 2
R =-0.18 R = 0.008 F =0.043 DW = 0.67
eviews8 :
T STUDENT
2 DW = 0.67 %5
2
.H0 .
:
. :(14)
VM =103718-20373.79 ITC
Prob 0.08 0.18
T stat 2.1 -1.5
2 2
R =0.32 R = 0.18 F =2.39 DW = 1.20
eviews8 :
(05) 1
(06) 2
71
:
T STUDENT
2 DW = 1.20 %5
1
.H0 .
: .4
IM= + ITC+
:
. :(15)
IM =44.86+16.38 ITC
Prob 0.30 0.29
T stat 1.16 1.13
R2 =0.2 2
R = 0.04 F =1.27 DW = 1.65
eviews8 :
%5 T STUDENT
2 DW = 1.65
2
.H0 .
:
. :(16)
IM =331.23+6.21 ITC
Prob 0.82 0.98
T stat 0.23 0.016
R2 =0.000053 2
R =- 0.19 F =0.0002 DW = 1.4
eviews8 :
T STUDENT
2 DW = 1.4 %5
3
.H0 .
(07) 1
(08) 2
(09) 3
72
:
VAR :
: var
: .1
:
AKAIKE INFO CRITERION
SCHWARZ INFO CRITERION
HANNAN – QUINN CRITERION
T- STATISTIC (p-val=0.5)
:(17)
VARBLE AIC SIC HQ T STAT P
ITC 1 1 1 1 1
RM 1 1 1 1 1
VT 1 1 1 1 1
VM 1 1 1 1 1
IM 1 1 1 1 1
.EVIEWS88 :
:(18)
VARBLE AIC SIC HQ T STAT P
ITC 1 1 1 1 1
RM 0 0 0 0 1
VT 1 1 1 1 1
VM 1 1 1 1 1
IM 1 1 1 1 1
.EVIEWS88 :
. ADF
. ADF :ADF .2
: ADF .
:ITC
ITC =a0+ ITC(-1)+a2t+ ITC(-1)+ t
73
:
:
itc adf : (19)
:
vm adf :(20)
VM =299.81-3.62 VM(-1)+43.42t + 1.80 VM(-1)
T stat pval 5% 1%
-171.44 0.001 -5.33 -8.23
eviews8 :
%5 VM
2
.H1 %5 T STUDENT
. :VT
VT =a0+ VT(-1)+a2t+ VT(-1)+ t
:
VT adf :(21)
VT =933.11- 1.68 VT(-1) – 104.52t + 0.17 VT(-1)
T stat pval 5% 1%
-289.57 0.0001 -5.33 -8.23
eviews8 :
%5 VT
3
.H1 %5 T STUDENT
(10) 1
(11) 2
(12) 3
74
:
:RM
: .I
RM =a0+ RM(-1)+a2t+ RM(-1)+ t
:
.Rm adf :(22)
eviews8 :
T STUDENT %5 RM
1
.H0 RM(-1)
:
H0= =a2=0
Drm
.ols
. wald
:
.Rm wald :(23)
Df f stat Q3 PVAL
eviews8 :
H0 pval> 5 % f stat < Q3 :
.
.
: .I
:
(12) 1
75
:
.Rm :(24)
eviews8 :
1
. =0 H0 :
H0=a0 = =0 : : .II
.
.wald
:
.Rm wald :(25)
Df f stat Q1 PVAL
eviews8 :
H0 5% :
.
: : .I
.Rm :(26)
RM =-0.46 RM(-1)+ 0.125 RM(-1)
T stat pval 5%
-1.37 0.14 -2.04
eviews8 :
PVAL=14.26%
2
. H0
: .I
%05 PVAL 2.96
(13) 1
(13) 2
76
:
.1 H1
. :IM
IM =a0+ IM(-1)+a2t+ IM(-1)+ t
:
.Im adf :(27)
eviews8 :
%5 IM
2
.H1 %5 T STUDENT
: ADF .
. :ITC .I
ITC =a0+ ITC(-1)+a2t+ ITC(-1)+ t
:
itc adf :(28)
ITC =-3.42+0.99ITC(-1)-0.07t- . ITC(-1)
T stat pval 5% 1%
0.58 0.98 -5.33 -8.23
eviews8 :
T STUDENT %5 RM
3
.H0 ITC(-1)
H0= =a2=0:
.DITC
.ols
. Wald
:
(13) 1
(14) 2
(15) 3
77
:
Df f stat Q3 PVAL
eviews8 :
H0 pval> 5 % f stat < Q3 :
.
1
.
: : .I
ITC =a0+ ITC(-1)+a2t+ ITC(-1)+ t
.ITC :(30)
ITC =3.28 – 0.87ITC(-1)-0.1 ITC(-1)
T stat pval 5%
-1.04 0.63 -3.69
eviews8 :
2
. =0 H0 :
H0=a0 = =0 : : .II
.
.wald
:
.ITC wald :(31)
Df f stat Q1 PVAL
eviews8 :
H0 5% :
3
.
(16) 1
(16) 2
(16) 3
78
:
: .III
:
.ITC :(32)
ITC =-0.00049 ITC(-1)- 0.17 ITC(-1)
T stat pval 5%
-0.05 -2.04 0.61
eviews8 :
.((16) ) H0
: .IV
PVAL
1
.ITC H0 %05
. ITC
: .3
VT ,VM,RM
.2
: IM
.Im :(33)
ITC = 0.68ITC(-1)-0.02IM(-1)+2.97….(01)
T stat 1.86 -2.36 3.17
pval 0.11 0.05 0.01
IM = 12.06ITC(-1)-0.25 IM(-1) + 78.84.…(02)
T stat 0.52 - 0.39 1.33
pval 0.61 0.70 0.22
eviews8 :
im(-1) (01)
3
IM. ITC %10
(16) 1
(17) 2
(18) 3
79
:
(02) (02)
.
:
. Im :(34)
ITC= -0.024 IM(-1)+2.97
T stat -2.36 3.17
pval 0.05 0.01
eviews8 :
%2.4 . 0.024
.
.
:
:
: .I
:
.1
. %2.4
.2
.
.3
.
.4
80
:
.
: .II
:
.1
.
2009 .2
.
.3
.
2011 .4
.
.5
7)
. (
81
:
82
:
:
84
:
.
:
( )
.
85
:
86
:
.
:
87
:
88
:
:
:
.1
.2007
.2
.2004
.3
.2003
.4
.2004
.5
.2006
.6
.2000
.7
.2008
.2005 .8
- - .9
.2010
- - .10
.2000
( ) .11
.2003
.12
.2003
.13
2001
.14
.2005
90
.15
.2004
.2004 .16
.17
.2003 30-28
.18
.1998
.19
.2009
: .20
.2005
.21
.2011
.22
.2000
.23
.2014
.2009 .24
.25
.2009
:
- - .26
.2013-2012 ( )
2009-2000 .27
.2012
91
.28
.2013
.29
.2011
.30
- -
.2014-2013
.31
" DML"
.2006/2005
:
.32
.2005 9-8 ( )
.33
"
.2003 23/22 ( ) "
.34
.2004 ( )
.35
. 2006 18-17 ( )
.36
-12 ( )
.2011 13
92
.37
.2011 13-12 ( )
.38
- –
.2004 15-14 ( )
:
.39
( )
.75 2013
.40
– ( ) –
.02 ( )
.41
.2009 7 ( )
.42
4
.1998
: .43
. 2008 5296
– .44
( ) 07 -
.2010 -2009
.45
.2003 93 24
) .46
.2010 85 ( ) (
93
:
.47
.2015
.2011 .48
.2013 .49
.2014 .50
.2013 .51
.2012 .52
5 ( ) .53
.2006 20 ( )
.2014 .54
60 .55
.2010
71 .56
.2012
.57
.2010 61
79 .58
.2014
.2015-2009 .59
:
http://www.sgbv.dz/ar/?page=rubrique&mod=143 .60
http://esm.sca.ae/Arabic/Pages/AboutESM.aspx: .61
: .62
http://www.bahrainbourse.net/bhb/about_us_ar.asp?page=about_us&sec=History
http://www.dse.sy/user/?page=about_market 2016 .63
: .64
http://www.ase.com.jo/ar/%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B5%D8%A9-
%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86
.65
http://www.qe.com.qa/pps/qe/qe%20arabic%20portal/Pages/About%20QE/About%20
94
:
Les ouvrages :
1. jACK JOHNSTON, JOHN DINARDO, méthode économétriques, traduit par Bernard
Guerrien (Paris : économica 4em édition 1999 ),
2. James d .hamilton , time series analasis, united kingdom, rpincton university press, 1994.
3. Mitchell Conover Jerold R.Jensen Robert R. Johnson ; Emerging markers when are the
Worth It? fnancial analaysts journal vol 58 N° 2 Mach -April 2002.
4. Régis bourbonnais, économétrie : cours et exercice courrigé, paris dunod, 3eme édition
2000.
5. RÉGIS BOURBONNAIS, MICHEL TERRAZA, Analyse des series temporelles en
économie.(Paris: presses universitaires de France, 1er édition, 1999.
6. Robert Reix système d’information et management des organisation libraire Vuibert
Paris France 1995.
Les thèses :
66. Daniel Salgado Lemos technologie de l’information et de la communication coordination
des réseaux pour le développement durable des zones enclavées thèse en master of science
institue agronomique méditerranéen de Montpelier n° 59 juillet 2001.
95
:
:01
PIB ( ) TX % INF % INDX ( ) VM ( ) VT ( )
. :(03)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 1.601111 1.899568 0.842882 0.4377
ITC -0.111111 0.508003 -0.218721 0.8355
R-squared 0.009477 Mean dependent var 1.185714
Adjusted R-squared -0.188627 S.D. dependent var 0.089974
Sum squared resid 0.048111 Schwarz criterion -1.586301
Log likelihood 7.497963 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.761858
F-statistic 0.047839 Durbin-Watson stat 0.547036
Prob(F-statistic) 0.835515
. :(04)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -1753.471 536.4519 -3.268645 0.0222
ITC 761.3636 202.0192 3.768769 0.0130
R-squared 0.739632 Mean dependent var 264.1429
Adjusted R-squared 0.687559 S.D. dependent var 162.5975
S.E. of regression 90.88619 Akaike info criterion 12.09205
Sum squared resid 41301.50 Schwarz criterion 12.07660
Log likelihood -40.32217 Hannan-Quinn criter. 11.90104
F-statistic 14.20362 Durbin-Watson stat 2.993824
Prob(F-statistic) 0.013039
. :(05)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 146101.9 67830.92 2.153914 0.0838
ITC -37594.11 18140.08 -2.072433 0.0930
R-squared 0.462075 Mean dependent var 5553.686
Adjusted R-squared 0.354490 S.D. dependent var 4359.725
S.E. of regression 3502.761 Akaike info criterion 19.39545
Sum squared resid 61346675 Schwarz criterion 19.37999
Log likelihood -65.88406 Hannan-Quinn criter. 19.20444
F-statistic 4.294978 Durbin-Watson stat 1.401941
Prob(F-statistic) 0.092952
. :(06)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 184.6076 232.0272 0.795629 0.4623
ITC -18.27619 87.37773 -0.209163 0.8426
R-squared 0.008674 Mean dependent var 136.1757
Adjusted R-squared -0.189591 S.D. dependent var 36.04185
S.E. of regression 39.31027 Akaike info criterion 10.41580
Sum squared resid 7726.485 Schwarz criterion 10.40035
Log likelihood -34.45532 Hannan-Quinn criter. 10.22479
F-statistic 0.043749 Durbin-Watson stat 0.675239
Prob(F-statistic) 0.842576
. :(07)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 103718.0 49272.71 2.104979 0.0892
ITC -20373.79 13177.04 -1.546158 0.1827
R-squared 0.323465 Mean dependent var 27549.16
Adjusted R-squared 0.188158 S.D. dependent var 2823.928
S.E. of regression 2544.423 Akaike info criterion 18.75615
Sum squared resid 32370434 Schwarz criterion 18.74070
Log likelihood -63.64653 Hannan-Quinn criter. 18.56514
F-statistic 2.390604 Durbin-Watson stat 1.202991
Prob(F-statistic) 0.182733
. :(08)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 44.84042 38.47784 1.165357 0.2964
ITC 16.38636 14.49014 1.130863 0.3094
R-squared 0.203676 Mean dependent var 88.26429
Adjusted R-squared 0.044411 S.D. dependent var 6.668718
S.E. of regression 6.518953 Akaike info criterion 6.822261
Sum squared resid 212.4838 Schwarz criterion 6.806807
Log likelihood -21.87791 Hannan-Quinn criter. 6.631250
F-statistic 1.278851 Durbin-Watson stat 1.655172
Prob(F-statistic) 0.309420
. :(09)
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 331.2378 1428.250 0.231919 0.8258
ITC 6.218391 381.9581 0.016280 0.9876
R-squared 0.000053 Mean dependent var 354.4857
Adjusted R-squared -0.199936 S.D. dependent var 67.32989
S.E. of regression 73.75424 Akaike info criterion 11.67431
Sum squared resid 27198.44 Schwarz criterion 11.65886
Log likelihood -38.86009 Hannan-Quinn criter. 11.48330
F-statistic 0.000265 Durbin-Watson stat 1.408226
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -171.4431 0.0001
Test critical values: 1% level -8.235570
5% level -5.338346
10% level -4.187634
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.652260 0.3952
Test critical values: 1% level -5.604618
10% level -2.982813
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
RM(-1) -0.916175 0.554498 -1.652260 0.2403
D(RM(-1)) 0.381698 0.518714 0.735854 0.5384
C 0.790838 0.772789 1.023355 0.4138
R-squared 0.577447 Mean dependent var -0.220000
Adjusted R-squared 0.154894 S.D. dependent var 1.116692
S.E. of regression 1.026571 Akaike info criterion 3.174034
Sum squared resid 2.107695 Schwarz criterion 2.939697
Log likelihood -4.935085 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.545096
F-statistic 1.366567 Durbin-Watson stat 2.449280
Prob(F-statistic) 0.422553
13
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.372723 0.1426
Test critical values: 1% level -3.109582
5% level -2.043968
10% level -1.597318
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
RM(-1) -0.464662 0.338496 -1.372723 0.2635
D(RM(-1)) 0.125767 0.458009 0.274595 0.8015
R-squared 0.356186 Mean dependent var -0.220000
Adjusted R-squared 0.141582 S.D. dependent var 1.116692
S.E. of regression 1.034624 Akaike info criterion 3.195128
Sum squared resid 3.211342 Schwarz criterion 3.038903
Log likelihood -5.987820 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.775836
Durbin-Watson stat 2.142966
13
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.601264 0.0296
Test critical values: 1% level -3.563915
5% level -2.157408
10% level -1.610463
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
D(RM(-1),2) -2.017319 0.775515 -2.601264 0.2336
D(RM(-1),3) 0.558975 0.505226 1.106386 0.4679
R-squared 0.899814 Mean dependent var 0.433333
Adjusted R-squared 0.799627 S.D. dependent var 3.271595
S.E. of regression 1.464464 Akaike info criterion 3.835577
Sum squared resid 2.144655 Schwarz criterion 3.234652
Log likelihood -3.753365 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.627641
Durbin-Watson stat 0.057407
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -56.00776 0.0001
Test critical values: 1% level -8.235570
5% level -5.338346
10% level -4.187634
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
IM(-1) -1.400646 0.025008 -56.00776 0.0114
D(IM(-1)) 0.100371 0.013737 7.306482 0.0866
C 124.6393 1.933259 64.47108 0.0099
@TREND("2009") 0.528208 0.081654 6.468876 0.0976
R-squared 0.999942 Mean dependent var 3.420000
Adjusted R-squared 0.999769 S.D. dependent var 9.706217
S.E. of regression 0.147562 Akaike info criterion -0.998577
Sum squared resid 0.021775 Schwarz criterion -1.311026
Log likelihood 6.496441 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.837161
F-statistic 5768.534 Durbin-Watson stat 2.959026
Prob(F-statistic) 0.009678
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 0.587882 0.9837
Test critical values: 1% level -8.235570
5% level -5.338346
10% level -4.187634
(16)
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.049767 0.6387
Test critical values: 1% level -5.604618
5% level -3.694851
10% level -2.982813
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
ITC(-1) -0.871693 0.830369 -1.049767 0.4040
D(ITC(-1)) -0.103090 0.420394 -0.245223 0.8292
C 3.285689 3.131495 1.049240 0.4042
R-squared 0.389439 Mean dependent var -0.008000
Adjusted R-squared -0.221123 S.D. dependent var 0.066858
S.E. of regression 0.073881 Akaike info criterion -2.089010
Sum squared resid 0.010917 Schwarz criterion -2.323347
Log likelihood 8.222525 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.717948
F-statistic 0.637837 Durbin-Watson stat 1.349916
Prob(F-statistic) 0.610561
16
Test Statistic Value df Probability
F-statistic 0.551765 (2, 2) 0.6444
Chi-square 1.103529 2 0.5759
Null Hypothesis: C(1)=C(2)=0
Null Hypothesis Summary:
Normalized Restriction (= 0) Value Std. Err.
C(1) 3.285689 3.131495
C(2) -0.871693 0.830369
16
t-Statistic Prob.*
Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -0.050400 0.6199
Test critical values: 1% level -3.109582
5% level -2.043968
10% level -1.597318
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
17
Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C(1) 0.248767 0.526535 0.472460 0.6533
C(2) -0.001021 0.003257 -0.313467 0.7645
C(3) 2.140908 1.469503 1.456892 0.1954
C(4) -61.72423 60.31947 -1.023289 0.3456
C(5) 0.689331 0.373072 1.847715 0.1142
C(6) 219.4584 168.3453 1.303620 0.2401
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
-0.5 -0.5
-1.0 -1.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cor(IM,ITC(-i)) Cor(IM,IM(-i))
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
-0.5 -0.5
-1.0 -1.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
18
Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations ± 2 S.E.
Res pons e of ITC to ITC Res pons e of ITC to IM
.4 .4
.2 .2
.0 .0
-.2 -.2
-.4 -.4
-.6 -.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 10
5 5
0 0
-5 -5
-1 0 -1 0
-1 5 -1 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10