V=Vo + (g - c/mVo)t METODO ANALITICO, RESULTA DE APLICAR EL ANALISIS MATEMATICO A LA FORM

iteración t (seg) Vi g c m Vi+1 t (seg) Vi+1

0 0 0 0 0 0
Vi+1
1 1 0 9.8 10 80 9.80 1 10 90
2 2 9.80 9.8 10 80 26.95 2 27
80
3 3 26.95 9.8 10 80 46.24 3 46
4 4 46.24 9.8 10 80 62.32 4 62 70
5 5 62.32 9.8 10 80 72.37 5 72 60
6 6 72.37 9.8 10 80 76.89 6 77
50
7 7 76.89 9.8 10 80 78.21 7 78
8 8 78.21 9.8 10 80 78.40 8 78 40
9 9 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 9 78 30
10 10 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 10 78 20
11 11 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 11 78
10
12 12 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 12 78
13 13 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 13 78 0
0 5 10
14 14 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 14 78
15 15 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 15 78
16 16 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 16 78
17 17 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 17 78
18 18 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 18 78
19 19 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 19 78
20 20 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 20 78

Vi+1
iteración t (seg) Vi (m/seg) g c m (kg) Vi+1 t (seg) Vi+1
80
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 9.8 10 80 9.80 1 10 70
2 2 9.80 9.8 10 80 18.38 2 18 60

50

40

30

20
NALISIS MATEMATICO A LA FORMULA DEL MODELO MATEMATICO

Vi+1

5 10 15 20 25

Vi+1
 Vi+1
80

70

60
3 3 18.38 9.8 10 80 25.88 3 26
4 4 25.88 9.8 10 80 32.44 4 32 50
5 5 32.44 9.8 10 80 38.19 5 38 40
6 6 38.19 9.8 10 80 43.21 6 43
30
7 7 43.21 9.8 10 80 47.61 7 48
8 8 47.61 9.8 10 80 51.46 8 51 20
9 9 51.46 9.8 10 80 54.83 9 55
10
10 10 54.83 9.8 10 80 57.77 10 58
11 11 57.77 9.8 10 80 60.35 11 60 0
0 5 10
12 12 60.35 9.8 10 80 62.61 12 63
13 13 62.61 9.8 10 80 64.58 13 65
14 14 64.58 9.8 10 80 66.31 14 66
15 15 66.31 9.8 10 80 67.82 15 68
16 16 67.82 9.8 10 80 69.14 16 69
17 17 69.14 9.8 10 80 70.30 17 70
18 18 70.30 9.8 10 80 71.31 18 71
19 19 71.31 9.8 10 80 72.20 19 72
20 20 72.20 9.8 10 80 72.97 20 73
 Vi+1

5 10 15 20 25
V=Vo + (g - c/mVo)t METODO ANALITICO, RESULTA DE APLICAR EL ANALISIS MATEMATICO A LA FORM

iteración t (seg) Vi g c m Vi+1 t (seg) V analitico

0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 9.8 10 80 9.80 1 10
2 2 9.80 9.8 10 80 26.95 2 27
3 3 26.95 9.8 10 80 46.24 3 46
4 4 46.24 9.8 10 80 62.32 4 62
COMPARACION DE RESU
5 5 62.32 9.8 10 80 72.37 5 72 90
6 6 72.37 9.8 10 80 76.89 6 77
80
7 7 76.89 9.8 10 80 78.21 7 78
70
8 8 78.21 9.8 10 80 78.40 8 78
9 9 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 9 78 60
10 10 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 10 78 50
11 11 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 11 78 40
12 12 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 12 78 30
13 13 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 13 78 20
14 14 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 14 78
10
15 15 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 15 78
16 16 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 16 78 0
0 5 10
17 17 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 17 78
18 18 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 18 78 V analitico V
19 19 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 19 78
20 20 78.40 9.8 10 80 78.40 20 78

EL MODELO ANALITICO OBTENIDO MEDIAN

EL MODELO NUMERICO OBTENIDO MEDIAN
iteración t (seg) Vi (m/seg) g c m (kg) Vi+1 t (seg) V numerico AMBAS CURVAS DIFIEREN INICIALMENTE
0 0 0 0 0 DEPUES DE UN CIERTO TIEMPO AMBAS CUR
1 1 0 9.8 10 80 9.80 1 10
2 2 9.80 9.8 10 80 18.38 2 18
3 3 18.38 9.8 10 80 25.88 3 26
4 4 25.88 9.8 10 80 32.44 4 32
5 5 32.44 9.8 10 80 38.19 5 38
 ALISIS MATEMATICO A LA FORMULA DEL MODELO MATEMATICO

COMPARACION DE RESULTADOS DE

5 10 15 20 25

V analitico V numerico

ANALITICO OBTENIDO MEDIANTE LA INTEGRACION DE LA ECUACION DIFERENICAL ES EXACTO

NUMERICO OBTENIDO MEDIANTE LA FORMULA DE EULER, ES APROXIMADO
VAS DIFIEREN INICIALMENTE
UN CIERTO TIEMPO AMBAS CURBAS SE APROXIMAN
 6 6 38.19 9.8 10 80 43.21 6 43
7 7 43.21 9.8 10 80 47.61 7 48
8 8 47.61 9.8 10 80 51.46 8 51
9 9 51.46 9.8 10 80 54.83 9 55
10 10 54.83 9.8 10 80 57.77 10 58
11 11 57.77 9.8 10 80 60.35 11 60
12 12 60.35 9.8 10 80 62.61 12 63
13 13 62.61 9.8 10 80 64.58 13 65
14 14 64.58 9.8 10 80 66.31 14 66
15 15 66.31 9.8 10 80 67.82 15 68
16 16 67.82 9.8 10 80 69.14 16 69
17 17 69.14 9.8 10 80 70.30 17 70
18 18 70.30 9.8 10 80 71.31 18 71
19 19 71.31 9.8 10 80 72.20 19 72
20 20 72.20 9.8 10 80 72.97 20 73
Nro Apellidos y Nombres g c m
1 ALEGRIA CHIRI BEIMAR 9.8 10.2 80
2 ALGARANAZ DAVILA ESTEFANY 9.8 10.4 82
3 ANGULO JUSTINIANO JULIO CESAR 9.8 10.6 84
4 ARTEAGA LEON DAVID 9.8 10.8 86
5 AVALOS GUZMAN LUIS FERNANDO 9.8 11 88
6 AÑEZ PAZ LUIS ALBERTO 9.8 11.2 90
7 BALDELOMAR ROSAS JONATHAN 9.8 11.4 92
8 BALTAZAR MAMANI JONATHAN 9.8 11.6 94
9 CABRERA ALVARADO DERLY TATIANA 9.8 11.8 96
10 CALANI SOLIZ BEYMAR JOSUE 9.8 12 98
11 CAMACHO SANDOVAL SCOLLY AYELEN 9.8 12.2 100
12 CASTELLON MEDRANO BRYAN 9.8 12.4 102
13 CASTELLON MERIDA ERICK 9.8 12.6 104
14 CHIRILLA FERNANDEZ ABRAHAM 9.8 12.8 106
15 CHOQUE CHOQUETOPA MARCOS 9.8 13 108
16 CHURA FERNANDEZ NOEMI 9.8 13.2 110
17 COCA MORALES ALEYDA NICOL 9.8 13.4 112
18 FLORES TARQUI LUIS LIMBER 9.8 13.6 114
19 GABRIEL CONDORI LUIS MIGUEL ULISES 9.8 13.8 116
20 GOMEZ CAMACHO CARLOS 9.8 14 118
21 GONZALES PAZ JULIAN 9.8 14.2 120
22 GRAGEDA FERNANDEZ RICHARDS 9.8 14.4 122
23 GUTIERREZ OTALORA YEISON ALEXANDER 9.8 14.6 124
24 GUTIERREZ QUINTANILLA DAVID SAMUEL 9.8 14.8 126
25 HERRERA CUELLAR BRUNO 9.8 15 128
26 HUANCA FLORES JOEL MARTIN 9.8 15.2 130
27 LAZO MARISCAL JOSE FERNANDO 9.8 15.4 132
28 LERRY HEREDIA ALEJANDRO 9.8 15.6 134
29 LIJERON CHAMO ROBERTO 9.8 15.8 136
30 LIMA SALAS JORGE 9.8 16 138
31 LIMON TERRAZAS JOSE DANIEL 9.8 16.2 140
32 MARTINEZ MICHEL JOSE MILTON 9.8 16.4 142
33 MARTINEZ RAMIREZ MIGUEL ANGEL 9.8 16.6 144
34 MENDOZA ORTEGA DUVAN 9.8 16.8 146
35 MOLINA ARNEZ WILMER 9.8 17 148
36 NOVA RODRIGUEZ CRISTIAN FERNANDO 9.8 17.2 150
37 NOVA RUIZ JHAMILKA 9.8 17.4 152
38 PACA CONDORI JHONATAN 9.8 17.6 154
39 PAREDES SARATE JONATAN 9.8 17.8 156
40 PAZ VACA RODRIGO 9.8 18 158
41 PINTO ROCHA OSVALDO ENRIQUE 9.8 18.2 160
42 QUISPE MAMANI ROLANDO 9.8 18.4 162
43 REQUENA BURGOS GONZALO 9.8 18.6 164
44 RIVERA LEON TIBOR RONALDO 9.8 18.8 166
45 RIVERA PEREZ ROBERTO CARLOS 9.8 19 168
46 ROBLES SEGOVIA JUSTINO 9.8 19.2 170
47 ROCHA SOLIZ DANIEL 9.8 19.4 172
48 ROJAS AGUILAR VICTOR GABRIEL 9.8 19.6 174
49 ROJAS PAULAS BYRON ISRAEL 9.8 19.8 176
50 SOLIS GUAMAN LIMBERT 9.8 20 178
51 TELLEZ ROMERO JHONATAN ALEX 9.8 20.2 180
52 TORRICO TORRICO NOEL LEANDRO 9.8 20.4 182
53 TUERO LOPEZ LUIS DAVID 9.8 20.6 184
54 URIONA VACA MAURICIO 9.8 20.8 186
55 VARGAS ALVAREZ JAMIL 9.8 21 188
56 VELIZ CUAQUIRA ADALID ALFREDO 9.8 21.2 190
57 ZARATE LLAVETA MOISES 9.8 21.4 192
58 ZURITA CAMACHO THIAGO FABRICIO 9.8 21.6 194