Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
J. WILK
Sweden
iulwi@tema.liii.se
D. A. HUGHES
yield; India
INTRODUCTION
change scenarios.
EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON HYDROLOGY
2002).
LAND-USE ANALYSIS
To determine the patterns of land-use change in the
catchment over the past few
Year of
publication /
Scale
1973
1:100 000
1986
1:250 000
1995
1:100 000
Source
1973 Survey of
India
topographical
maps
Landsat
imageries from
1973-1979
1994 Survey of
India
topographical
Open land
Open scrub
Grass
plantations
Various crops
Cultivated land
Irrigated crops
(millet, groundnut)
Grassland
Irrigated agriculture
Reserved forest
Unreserved forest
Dense scrub
Open jungle
Wooded area
Re-afforested areas
Thorny thicket
Shola forest
Semi-evergreen forest
Dense thicket
scattered shrubs
Scrub woodland
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
S 1965
D 1973
D 1973-1979
D1994
i r OH
Plantations Savanna
down) for the land use over the "forested" area. The
FF parameter essentially allows
been applied.
of the table the model has been run with the base
parameter values or the changes
Parameter chang
PIV'=0.5, PIF==
PIV= l.0,PIF =
PIV'=2.0, PIF ==
i? = 0
R=].0
FF = 1.0
FF= 1.5
ZMIN =350
ZMIN =600
;es
= 2.0
= 3.5
= 6.0
Interception
(mm)
120.7 (-
229.9 (-
-58%)
-19%)
423.9 (+48%)
285.5
285.5
285.5
285.5
285.5
285.5
Actual
évapotranspiration
(mm)
917.3 (-4%)
944.8 (-1%)
992.0 (+4%)
988.0 (+3%)
933.0 (-3%)
862.2 (-10%)
979.8 (+2%)
955.5
957.6
Surface
runoff
(mm)
60.9 (+25%)
52.3 (+8%)
40.4 (-17%)
48.5
48.5
48.5
48.5
77.9 (+61%)
38.0 (-22%)
Soil moisture
runoff
(mm)
651.1 (+4%)
635.2 (+1%)
605.2 (-4%)
597.6 (-5%)
652.0 (+4%)
726.5 (+16%)
605.5 (-4%)
600.5 (-4%)
638.2 (+2%)
Project
3
4
Basin
Subcatchment
1.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.1
4.2
Area (km2)
37
366
122
264
256
117
356
554
90
107
206
216
180
670
563
4100
30
50
100
50
30
40
100
20
20
40
30
30
35
70
60
30
100
50
70
60
80
40
50
50
70
70
59
30
10
20
20
40
30
10
Commercial
forest (%)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Agriculture
(%)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Tea
(%)
100
40
70
30
50
100
30
50
100
100
50
50
50
50
30
49
(a)
(b)
50
20
-40
3500
3000
2500
2000
! 1500
1000
500
DMAR
H Assured Yield
à, CV of MAR
&S»!% CdJ I hi D
DMAR
Q Assured Yield
0-
__
ZMIN
(mm month"1)
PIV
(mm)
PIF
(mm)
FF
Indigenous forest
Agriculture
Tea
Commercial forest
Tree savanna
Scrub savanna
600
400
450
550
500
510
1.5
1.5
1.5
4-6
3.5
3.8
3.8
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.4
1.3
1.4
1.5
1
1.1
ZMIN
(mm month"1)
PIV
(mm)
PIF
(mm)
FF
Project 1
Project 2
Project _
Project 4
Control (indigenous)
Agriculture AI= 0
Tea
Commercial forest
1965
1995
Control (indigenous)
Agriculture AI = 0
Tea
Commercial forest
1965
1995
Control (indigenous)
Agriculture AI = 0
Tea
Commercial forest
1965
1995
Control (indigenous)
Agriculture AI = 0
Tea
Commercial forest
1965
1995
500
350
350
500
400
400
450-900
300-600
400-850
400-800
350-750
300-700
500-1100
300-700
350-1000
450-1000
500-1100
400-1150
800
500
650-700
700
900
900
1-1.5
0
0.5-1
1-1.5
1.5-2
0.5-1
1-2
1-1.3
1-1.5
0.5-1.5
0-1.5
1.1-2
1-1.2
1-1.5
1.4-2
1-1.9
1-1.6
1-1.3
1-1.5
1.4-1.8
1.4-1.8
4.5-5
1.5-2
3-3.5
4.5-5
5.5-6
2.5-3
3.5-6
1.5-2
3.3-3.7
4.5-5
2.5-5
2.5-5
4-6
1.5-2
3.5-3.6
4.5-5
4.5-6
4-5
3.3-4.8
1.5-2
3.5-3.7
4.5-5
4-5
4.5-5
0.3
1
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.2-0.4
0.3-0.4
0.15-0.7
0.15-0.9
0.2-0.4
0.3-0.45
0.2-0.4
0.15-1.2
0.35-0.4
0.4-0.45
0.3-0.35
0.3-0.35
1.1
1.4
1.5
1.2
1.15
1.1-1.2
1.2-1.4
1.5
1.05-1.25
1.05-1.15
1.1-1.2
1.2-1.4
1.5
1.1-1.5
1-1.2
1.1
1.2
1.5
1.1-1.2
1.1-1.2
forest.
RESULTS
example).
yield.
3=
-J
QC
Zi
c:
<
o
5?
18
15
12
3I
0'-—
yield.
CONCLUSION
- Forest
- Plantation
Tea
Agriculture
//
//
-'/
REFERENCES
141.
Publ.no''. 140.
Samraj, P.. llaldorai. B. & Henry, C. (1982)
Conservation forestry. In: 25 Years Research on Soil
and Water Conservation