Lampiran

HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA

A. Univariat
1. Pengetahuan

Statistics

Pengetah
uan

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Mean 9.29

Median 9.00

Mode 8a

a. Multiple modes exist. The

smallest value is shown

Pengetahuan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 4 2 3.8 3.8 3.8

5 5 9.6 9.6 13.5

6 4 7.7 7.7 21.2

7 5 9.6 9.6 30.8

8 7 13.5 13.5 44.2

9 6 11.5 11.5 55.8

10 5 9.6 9.6 65.4

11 2 3.8 3.8 69.2

12 4 7.7 7.7 76.9

13 7 13.5 13.5 90.4

14 5 9.6 9.6 100.0

Total 52 100.0 100.0

 Pie chart

Statistics

KATPENGETAHU
AN

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Sum 23

KATPENGETAHUAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid RENDAH 29 55.8 55.8 55.8

TINGGI 23 44.2 44.2 100.0

Total 52 100.0 100.0

 2. Sikap

Statistics

SIKAP

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Mean 45.48

Median 45.00

Mode 45

SIKAP

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 42 1 1.9 1.9 1.9

43 4 7.7 7.7 9.6

44 9 17.3 17.3 26.9

45 16 30.8 30.8 57.7

46 15 28.8 28.8 86.5

47 3 5.8 5.8 92.3

49 1 1.9 1.9 94.2

51 1 1.9 1.9 96.2

52 2 3.8 3.8 100.0

Total 52 100.0 100.0

Pie chart

Statistics

KATSIKAP

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Sum 22
 KATSIKAP

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid NEGATIF 30 57.7 57.7 57.7

POSITIF 22 42.3 42.3 100.0

Total 52 100.0 100.0

3. Perilaku

Statistics

PRILAKU

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Mean 8.88

Median 9.00
 Statistics

PRILAKU

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Mean 8.88

Median 9.00

Mode 10

PRILAKU

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 1 1 1.9 1.9 1.9

6 2 3.8 3.8 5.8

7 8 15.4 15.4 21.2

8 9 17.3 17.3 38.5

9 9 17.3 17.3 55.8

10 15 28.8 28.8 84.6

11 7 13.5 13.5 98.1

13 1 1.9 1.9 100.0

Total 52 100.0 100.0

 Pie chart

Statistics

KATPRILAKU

N Valid 52

Missing 0

Sum 32

KATPRILAKU

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid KURANG BAIK 20 38.5 38.5 38.5

BAIK 32 61.5 61.5 100.0

Total 52 100.0 100.0

 B. BIVARIAT

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

KATP * KATPRILAKU 52 100.0% 0 .0% 52 100.0%

KATSIKAP * KATPRILAKU 52 100.0% 0 .0% 52 100.0%

KATPRILAKU

Crosstab

KATPRILAKU

KURANG BAIK BAIK Total

KATP RENDAH Count 13 16 29

 Expected Count 11.2 17.8 29.0

% within KATP 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

TINGGI Count 7 16 23

Expected Count 8.8 14.2 23.0

% within KATP 30.4% 69.6% 100.0%

Total Count 20 32 52

Expected Count 20.0 32.0 52.0

% within KATP 38.5% 61.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.123a 1 .289

Continuity Correctionb .597 1 .440

Likelihood Ratio 1.134 1 .287

Fisher's Exact Test .392 .220

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.101 1 .294

N of Valid Casesb 52

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,85.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for KATP

1.857 .588 5.870
(RENDAH / TINGGI)

For cohort KATPRILAKU =

1.473 .704 3.081
KURANG BAIK

For cohort KATPRILAKU =

.793 .518 1.213
BAIK

N of Valid Cases 52
KATSIKAP * KATPRILAKU

Crosstab

KATPRILAKU

KURANG BAIK BAIK Total

KATSIKAP NEGATIF Count 11 19 30

Expected Count 11.5 18.5 30.0

% within KATSIKAP 36.7% 63.3% 100.0%

POSITIF Count 9 13 22

Expected Count 8.5 13.5 22.0

% within KATSIKAP 40.9% 59.1% 100.0%

Total Count 20 32 52

Expected Count 20.0 32.0 52.0

% within KATSIKAP 38.5% 61.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .097a 1 .756

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 .982

Likelihood Ratio .096 1 .756

Fisher's Exact Test .780 .490

Linear-by-Linear Association .095 1 .758

N of Valid Casesb 52

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,46.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for KATSIKAP

.836 .271 2.585
(NEGATIF / POSITIF)

For cohort KATPRILAKU =

.896 .450 1.783
KURANG BAIK
For cohort KATPRILAKU =
1.072 .689 1.667
BAIK

N of Valid Cases 52