4/3/2017

Stage 1 Design
Package
Company: Mars Formula
Client: EMPACT

Members:
Designers:
Daniel Papalia
Romesh Sibera
Gleb Bogachev
Contractors:
Justin Rashidi
Mandakh Ganbaatar
Juman Al Yarubi
Table of Contents
Design Specification ............................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Dimensions Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2
Client Brief ................................................................................ ! .
Bill of Materials .................................................................................................................................. 3
Construction Sequence ...................................................................................................................... 4
Risk Management Plan ........................................................................................................................... 6
Risk Assessment and Management Plan ............................................................................................ 6
Tender Evaluation criteria .................................................................................................................... 10
Tender Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................................... 11
Depth Description of Criteria ........................................................................................................... 14
GNATT CHART .......................................................................... ! .

Page 1 of 29

 Design Specification
Company Name: Mars Formula
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover/Lander
Date: 4/3/2017

Introduction
This document contains the specification for the construction of the Mars formula. Based
upon this specification, a fabrication company will be able to successfully manufacture the
reactor body to the standards expected by the client, Clive Maynard.

Dimensions Summary
The drawings package should be referred to as the definitive authority on all dimensions. A
summary of the main dimensions are as follows Table 1

Dimension Name Dimension Value

Rover Base Length: 310 mm, width: 160 mm, Height: 10

mm.
Bottle Holder Length: 215 mm, width: 80 mm, height: 80
mm.
Wheel (CD) Diameter: 120 mm

Wheel Hub Square core: 20 mm, arms(L): 10 mm, arms

(w): 15 mm, axel hole diameter: 6.30 mm,

Page 2 of 29

 Axles Have At least 2
Weight Carry 600ml water( 205mm * 70mm)
Budget Less than $30
Height Less than 210 mm
Cargo Must hold a cargo, be able to assessed
remotely
3D budget Must be less than theoretical cost (25%)
Footprint Must fit within A3 paper
Free wheeling Yes
Prototype Prototype(Rover/Lander) has to travel 2m
ramp with 30 degrees inclination(at least)
and 1 m drop without serious damage

Based upon drawings package, the following bills of materials, Table 2, has been assembled

Bill of Materials
Table 2

Item Purpose Dimension Dimension Dimension Price $

1 (Width) 2 (Height) 3 (Length)

CDs/DVD Wheels 140 mm 30 mm 140 mm 7.99$

Rod Metal mate Wheels 1.6 mm 1.6 mm 200mm 0.84$

(Aluminum solid)
Acrylic plastic Base 160 mm 10 mm 310 mm 16.20$

Balsa sheet Bottle Holder 100 mm 2.5 mm 915 mm 7.20$

3D plastic Wheel hub -

Bottle of water - 255mm 70mm - -

Industrial stable Holder 100mm - - 9.75$

Velcro tape Holder 1 mm - 25mm 1.35$

Total 43.33$

Page 3 of 29


Construction Sequence
4.1 Rover Base:
1. Obtain material (acrylic plastic) required for the construction of base as directed in material
section.
2. Check dimensions of material regarding the rover base drawing (Picture 4)
3. Using pencil and ruler outline the dimensions on acrylic plastic piece.
4. Using bandsaw cut the acrylic plastic base according to dimensions.
5. Re check to confirm dimensions of base is correct.

4.2 Axle Bearings:

1. Obtain 3D printing material required for axle bearing.
2. Input dimension values in printing machine.
3. Re check to confirm dimensions are correct according to design.

4.3 Axle:
Gather the required amount of material (aluminium rod).
Cut the rods according to the measurements given on table (Table 2: Dimension Summary 1)
Repeat this process once more for the second axle. One for front set of axle bearing and one
for rear axle bearing.

4.4 Wheels (CD):

1. Obtain the number of CDs required (24 CDs: 3 on each wheel).
2. Using super glue and firm precision glue all 3 CDs to each other to one wheel. Repeat for
next wheels.
3. Wait 8 10 minutes for glue to set and dry.
4. Using pen/marker of choice clearly mark out the correct locations and dimensions of points
to be drilled.
5. Using electric drill, drill the marked-out points.

4.5 Wheel Hub:

1. Obtain 3D printing material required for wheel bearing.
2. Apply measurements as stated in drawing (picture2).

4.6 Bottle Compartment:

1. Gather material (balsa wood) for compartment base and walls with correct amount as stated
in table (Bill of Material summary 1).
2. On the balsa wood, mark out dimensions for the 3 walls and 1 base according to dimension
specifics in table (Dimension Summary 1)
3. Using bandsaw cut out each section as mention in bold font above.
4. Using high strength super glue stick one wall to the base at one time. Make sure the wall
produce a 90 degree angle with base.
5. Wait 3-4 minutes before gluing each wall section to base.
6. After all 4 wall sections have been glued to base, allow the structure to set and dry for 8 10
minutes.

4.7 Velcro straps:

Page 4 of 29

 1. Gather the required amount of Velcro material as stated in
table (Bill of Material summary 1)
2. Using clear, noticeable marker outline the correct dimensions of the 2 Velcro straps.
3. Note: Usual pen/markers may not be visible on Velcro surface.

Attachment of Velcro straps to bottle compartment:

Using Industrial stapler, firmly staple the 2 strips to one side of one of the longer walls of
compartment. Refer to picture 5a and 5b for correct locations and dimensions.
Using super glue, stick one grip strip for each Velcro strip on opposite/parallel wall. Test first
make sure the Velcro strip comes to contact with grip strip when looped over the bottle
compartment.

Attachment of wheel bearings to base:

Using screws firmly screw the wheel bearings on to base according to drawing number 2
and 8

Attachment of wheel hub to wheels:

Using cup head bolts, screw in the bolts through the appropriate locations of the wheels as
illustrated on drawing 2 and 3

Assemble of axel into wheels:

Thread axel through the each set of parallel wheel bearing.
Bolt both side of wheel with bolts along the axel so wheel is held firmly in place. Please refer
to drawing 2

Attachment of bottle compartment to rover base

Refer to drawing 4 for locations for screws to be drilled through.
According to measurements on drawing 4 plot screw locations on compartment base.
Using Screwdriver, firmly screw bolts through screw locations.
Using nuts, secure the bolts in place

Mars Formula
Page 5 of 29

 Risk Management Plan

Client: Mars formula

Date: 4/03/2017

Risk Assessment and Management Plan
1.0 Introduction
This document deals with the risk assessment and management of the Mars Rover project.
The plan overs two stages of the project: design and construction.
2.0 Design phase
2.1 Hazard identification
Several hazards were identified for the design stage including: damage to computers
or storage devices, team members getting sick, and conflict amongst team members.
2.2 Risks arising
The potential risks which could arise from the hazards identified above, were all rated
as high. Given this rating, actions must be taken to mitigate them.
3.0 Construction phase
3.0 Hazard identification
The hazards identified for this stage were: unclear instructions, misuse of equipment
and safety guidelines not being followed.
3.2 Risks arising
The potential risks for this stage included injury of team members, damage to
university property and the build team not being able to construct the rover.

Page 6 of 29

Table 3 , Next Page

Page 7 of 29

Design Phase
Hazard Risk Likelihood Consequen Rating Management Residual Risk
ce
Damage to computers or Loss of important Possible Major High All project work is to be backed up. Low
USB storage devices documents and files Copies are to be stored on multiple
resulting not work not devices.
being submitted.
Team member gets sick Allocated work is not Likely Moderate High All team members must be aware of Low
completed all roles and be ready to take on
additional work if required.

Disagreement/conflict Project is not Possible Moderate High Establish guidelines to resolve Moderate
amongst team members. completed on time conflicts and ensure that all team
members agree follow them.

Risk management Chart 1

Construction Phase
Hazard Risk Likelihood Consequence Rating Management Residual Risk
Build team is unable to Rover is not Unlikely High Medium Build instructions are to be Low
follow instructions constructed correctly submitted to third party for feedback
and fails and will be rewritten if required

Equipment is not used Damage to university Possible Moderate High Ensure that all team members are Low
correctly property or equipment knowledgeable with the equipment
they use.
Safety guidelines are Team members are Possible Major High All team members are to use Low
not followed when injured PPE where required and are to
using tools follow all safety guidelines
and advice of supervisors

Risk management Chart 2

Risk Matrix Chart 1

Page 9 of 29

 Mars Formula

Tender Evaluation criteria

Client: EMPACT

Date: 4/03/2017

Page 10 of 29

Tender Evaluation Criteria
This document contains criteria and skills that are required to produce the mars rover that has
been designed. In order for the tender to be successful, the tenderer has to meet the criteria
that are required and listed below.
Criteria Details of criteria Mark
Risk Management The team should mitigate (0-5) Have no or very
all risks that is expected as few personal protective
possible. equipment (PPE). No or
Follows the risk very limited group allocation
management plan accurately task sheet is presented.

(6-10) 25-50% of
having a build instruction
but not signed by third party
and have majority of PPE.
Satisfactory group allocation
task sheet presented.

(11-15) 50-75 % of
having a build instruction
but not signed by third party
and have majority of PPE.
(16-20) 75%-100% of
having a build instruction
that proofread and signed
by third party and having
all PPE that is required, to
show group allocation task
sheet signed by others.

/20

Professionalism Participates in all (0 5) less than 0-

tasks and very 25% of attendance in
effective with group meetings and
projects. 0-2 hours record in
The tasks should be group hours.
completed in an (6-10) at least 25-
organized process. 50% or less in the
weekly group
meetings, and 1-3
hours in the weekly
progress.

Page 11 of 29


Time management The staff should be
punctual with
schedule and capable
of meeting the
deadlines amicably.
Staff should be
sufficient and
efficient with time.
Communication skills The staff are required to be
available to share
misunderstanding to find
solutions.
The staff are required to
sharp in terms of responding
to the design problem and
messages.
Page 12 of 29
(11-15)50-75%
attendance of group
weekly meetings
(16-20) 75%-100%
in weekly group
meetings and 4 or
more hours of
attendance in weekly
progress.
/20
(0-5) Documents of
completing less than
45% of the task
assigned and
confirmed by fellow
group members.
(6-10) document
confirming the
deadline being met
and fully completed
at least 50% to 65%
of the task assigned.
(11-15) signed
documents of weekly
progress by fellow of
group members of
full completion of
weekly group tasks
and revised and
confirmed and
meeting the
deadlines.
/15
(0-5) Transcripts of
email indicating of
replying more than
48 hours or more
(6-10) transcripts of
email indicating
replying 48 hours
(11-15) transcripts
replying between 48
hours and 24 hours
(16-20) transcripts
replying in 24 hours
or less
/20
 Capability The staff should be able to (0-10) A photo of
work with wood and have the previous work
familiar background in wood completed
fabrication. (11-15) A sample of
The staff need to know how completed
to use tool required woodwork project
appropriately. It's vital for without a referee or
the applicant to have a document to confirm.
knowledge of operating the (16-20) Evidence of
tools safely. previous completed
woodwork projects
and a qualified
referee to reference.
(21-25) High School
report and work
experience with a
referee approving the
completed projects
nd indicating a
familiarity with
using a power tool
safely.
/25
Tender Evaluation Criteria Chart 1

Page 13 of 29

Depth Description of Criteria
Professionalism In this criterion, a high level would be evidently demonstrated by the
weekly progress indicating an attendance of 75% and above while covering 4 or more hours
in the weekly group meetings
Time Management- To demonstrate a high level, the tenderer must meet the requirement of a
document demonstrating the tenderer meeting all deadlines of the task assigned and must be
approved and signed by fellow members.
Communication skills The tenderer must demonstrate an email transcript whereby; the
replies are within 24 hours or less.
Capabilities- Staff need to have experience in interpreting AutoCAD designs. Staff contain
experience in safely handling power tools like drill, circular saw. The tenderer must contain a
high school report where it indicates an experience of working with wood, or a referee
approving of work experience in working with wood fabrication.
Risk Management Each team members must be aware of risk that is expected and should
mitigate the risks with suggested plans.

Page 14 of 29

 GANTT CHART

Wk5 Wk6 TF TFW Wk7 Wk8 Wk9 Wk10 Wk11 Wk12

W
EFPC Stage 1 _ Stage 2 _ Stage 2 Designers Supervision Handover Eng Presentation
Deadlines Design Contractor Submission activity (May Identity
Package s (Sunday March 7th engineering th
15 ) Reflection Unit
Team action ) identity Reflection
plan reflection Presentatio
activity n Review
Other Mid (ACOM) _ _ Calculus Mid semester Calculus Peer Finals
EFY Semester Writing a mid test(Programming) Test review ACOM
Deadlines Exam: synthesis semester presentatio 1000
Mechanics APA exam n (Oral
Reference. (25%) presentation
)
Contractor Finish the Contractor Contractor Contingen Manage conflict Presentation Presentati Testing
s tender s s cy plans style activity on
Names: criteria(M, submission submission Outline
(Juman) J) Q&A May7th Ethics
(Mandakh specificatio Tender Activity
) n Application
(Justin) Evidence
activity

GANTT CHART 1 Page 15 of 29

Designers Drawing _ Tender The submission of Presentati Testing
Names: package application designs on
evaluation Outline
(Daniel) dimension DPR
(Gleb) Summary Response
(Romesh) Activity
Billing
materials

Page 16 of 29

 Drawings
Table of Drawings:

Number Descriptions
Picture 1 Axle Bearings
Picture 2 Wheel Hub
Picture 3 Wheel
Picture 4 Rover Base
Picture 5a Bottle Holder
Picture 5b Bottle Holder
Picture 6 Exploded View
Picture 7 Axial Bearings 3D
Picture 8 Wheel Hub 3D
Picture 9 Bottle Holder 3D
Picture 10 Body 3D

Page 17 of 29

Picture 1

side cross
section front top
14 1,5 4 4 axle
4

R2 8

14
3

,8
R1
R4

Axle Bearing

Page 18 of 29

Picture 2

Page 19 of 29

Picture 3

Picture 4
Page 20 of 29

Table

Number Material

1 Acrylic plastic, Balsa sheet

2 3D plastic

3 CDs/DVD

4 Rod Metal mate (Aluminum solid)

5 Balsa Wood

Page 21 of 29

Picture 5a

Page 22 of 29

Picture 5b

Page 23 of 29

Picture 6

Page 24 of 29

Picture 7

Page 25 of 29

Picture 8

Page 26 of 29

Page 27 of 29

Picture 9

Page 28 of 29

Picture 10

Page 29 of 29