Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Historical Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Eastern North Sea Cod
Historical Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Eastern North Sea Cod
Abstract: Recent analyses of historical data of fish abundance and distribution have shown the importance of a long tempo-
ral perspective in the evaluation of the current status of fish populations, but pose numerous difficulties such as fragmenta-
tion and inhomogeneities in the amount of available information in space and time. Using mixed-effects models in a
multiscale analysis, we identified an appropriate spatiotemporal scale of investigation of a high-quality, spatially explicit his-
torical data set, and we reconstructed the long-term spatial dynamics of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the Kattegat–
Skagerrak along the 20th century. We identified a northern and southern main aggregation of adult cod in the study area,
corresponding to the Skagerrak portion of the North Sea and the Kattegat cod stocks, respectively. The stocks showed spe-
cificities in their spatial dynamics, but common extensive loss of coastal aggregations during the last decades when only
13% (Kattegat) and 35% (Skagerrak) of the estimated early century cod biomass was left. Our reconstruction showed that
the collapse of the cod stocks in the area followed the peak in landings in the 1960s–1970s, suggesting that the postwar de-
velopment of the industrial fisheries played a major role in the decrease of local abundances and disappearance of local
adult cod aggregations.
Résumé : Des analyses récentes de données historiques sur l’abondance et la distribution de poissons ont démontré l’impor-
tance d’une perspective temporelle à long terme dans l’évaluation de l’état actuel des populations de poissons. Ces analyses
For personal use only.
présentent toutefois de nombreuses difficultés, telles qu’une fragmentation et une hétérogénéité spatiales et temporelles de la
quantité d’information disponible. En utilisant des modèles à effets mixtes dans une analyse multi-échelle, nous avons cerné
une échelle spatiotemporelle convenant à l’étude d’un ensemble de données historiques spatialement explicites de haute qua-
lité et reconstitué la dynamique spatiale à long terme de la morue franche (Gadus morhua) dans la région du Cattégat et du
Skagerrak au cours du 20e siècle. Nous avons cerné deux grandes agrégations, septentrionale et méridionale, de morues
adultes dans la région à l’étude, correspondant aux stocks de la région du Skagerrak de la mer du Nord et du Cattégat, res-
pectivement. Si les deux stocks présentaient des spécificités en ce qui concerne leur dynamique spatiale, ils étaient tous
deux caractérisés par la disparition généralisée d’agrégations côtières durant les dernières décennies, alors qu’il ne restait
que 13 % (Cattégat) et 35 % (Skagerrak) de la biomasse de morue estimée du début du siècle. La reconstitution a démontré
que l’effondrement des stocks de morue dans la région s’est produit dans la foulée de la pointe des débarquements des an-
nées 1960–1970, portant à croire que le développement des pêches industrielles dans l’après-guerre a joué un rôle majeur
dans la diminution de l’abondance locale et la disparition d’agrégations locales de morues adultes.
[Traduit par la Rédaction]
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69: 833–841 (2012) doi:10.1139/F2012-028 Published by NRC Research Press
834 Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Vol. 69, 2012
Thurstan et al. 2010). Several research institutes and govern- species, including cod, similar to what has been inferred for
mental agencies around the world have realized the impor- the central North Sea before the onset of steam trawling fish-
tance of historical data to assess the present and are ery in the 1880s (Mackinson 2002). Here, we show how a
currently investing time and resources to recover and analyse convenient scale of analysis can be detected from a high-
information stored in their archives (ICES 2010). With few quality historical data set of the distribution of Atlantic cod
exceptions (Cardinale et al. 2011; Rogers et al. 2011), and how it can be applied to improve the reconstruction of
fisheries-dependent historical data have been employed to in- the abundance of this fish population. Finally, the estimates
fer the status of exploited fish populations in the early phase are discussed in light of a century of exploitation in the area.
of industrialized fisheries (i.e., Thurstan et al. 2010).
Although very informative, this kind of data suffers from the Material and methods
limitations set by the fishermen behaviour and market re-
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by SLU-Biblioteket on 04/30/12
lated to smaller scale interactions between species (Melillo et been conducted by the Swedish research vessel Argos within
al. 1993; Nemani et al. 2003). Although it has become in- IBTS (International Bottom Trawl Survey; ICES 1992), how-
creasingly clear that the problem of scale is a necessary pre- ever, national trawl surveys were also carried out. An exten-
requisite for developing a more complete understanding of sive coastal trawl survey was launched in 2001, including the
ecosystem dynamics (Wiens 1989; Levin 1992; McGill Kattegat and the eastern coastal part of the Skagerrak. Trawl
2010) and responses to anthropogenic impacts (Bartolino et station information include date, haul duration, towing speed,
al. 2012), the issue how scale can affect and limit the study setting and hauling position (latitude and longitude; positions
of historical data has never been addressed. The scale issue were reconstructed from detailed fishing area information for
is particularly relevant in the analysis of historical field data, those hauls carried out prior to the use of more advanced
where sampling intensity is often heterogeneous in space and navigation equipments, i.e., GPS), and depth (metres). Only
time, despite the fact that temporal and spatial scales are hauls conducted exclusively during daylight hours were used
often correlated (Wiens 1989). How can we cope with the in the analysis. For each haul, the number and the total
lack of a uniform scale of investigation? Using historical length (cm) of cod specimens were recorded. For some hauls
data requires an a posteriori approach for detecting a suitable (less than 3% of the total), length–frequency data were not
scale of analysis (i.e., long time after the sampling occurred) available, although the total number of fish caught by species
to mediate information collected at different intensity and was reported. In these cases, the length–frequency distribu-
coverage over time and to match, at the best, the processes tion, as estimated in the same year, semester, and area, was
of interest. used to calculate the number of fish per length class (1 cm).
Here, we reconstructed the spatial dynamics of the com- We calculated local abundance of adult cod as the biomass
mercially important Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the Ska- per swept area (kg·km–2) of those individuals equal to or
gerrak and Kattegat, eastern North Sea (ENS). The Skagerrak larger than 39 cm in total length (the size at which 50% of
and Kattegat have been important fishing areas since the fish are usually mature). Fish biomass was calculated using
Middle Ages, along the coasts for Atlantic herring (Clupea an annual length–mass relationship based on data collected
harengus), and offshore for demersal fishes such as cod, had- at the time of the survey since 1981. The masses previous to
dock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), European ling (Molva 1981 were estimated using average parameter values for
molva), Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), rays, 1981–2007.
and skates (Haneson and Rencke 1923). Offshore, long lines Results were discussed in the light of additional informa-
were the most important fishing gears until the 20th century. tion on environmental temperature and fisheries exploitation.
In the beginning of the 1900s, trawl fishery was introduced, We used the Met Office Hadley Centre’s sea ice and sea sur-
which increased the fishing pressure considerably (Andersson face temperature (SST) data set, HadISST1. This data set is a
1954). However, fishing mortality can be assumed to have combination of monthly globally complete fields of SST and
been still at moderate levels in the beginning of the 20th cen- sea ice concentration on a 1° latitude–longitude grid from
tury in the Skagerrak and Kattegat for most of the demersal 1870 (obtained from http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/view/badc.nerc.ac.
1Supplementary data are available with the article through the journal Web site at http://nrcresearchpress.com/doi/suppl/10.1139/f2012-028.
Fig. 1. Map of the eastern North Sea, with shaded region indicating the study area and the points the observations (see Fig. 3 for details on
temporal variability of the sampling spatial coverage).
62 N
0 50 100 km
Norway
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by SLU-Biblioteket on 04/30/12
60
●
Latitude (°N)
●
●
●
● ●●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
● ● ●● ●
●●
●
● ●
●
●
●● ●
● ●
●
● ● ●
●
●●●
●
● ●●
●● ●
●
●
●
●●
● ● ●
●
●●
●●● ●
●
●
●●
● ●● ●
● ●
●
● ●
●
● ● ● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●● ● ●● ● ●● ● ●●
●
●
●
●●● ●●
●
●● ● ● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●● ● ● ● ● ●
●●●
●● ●
● ● ●●●
●
●
●
● ● ●
● ●
●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●● ● ● ● ● ● ●
●
●
●●
● ● ●● ● ● ● ●● ●
●
●●
● ●
●●●● ●●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●●●
●● ●●●● ●●
● ●●●●●
● ●
●● ● ● ●
●
●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
● ●
● ●
●
●● ● ●●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ●
●●
●
●● ●●●
●●
●
● ●● ● ●
●●
● ●●
● ●
● ●
●●
●
●● ●●● ●
●
● ● ●●
●
●● ●● ●●●
● ● ●
●●
●●
● ●
● ● ●● ●●● ●
●●● ●●
● ●
●
●● ●●
● ●● ●●●
●
●●
● ● ● ●
●
●●●
●●
● ● ●● ●● ● ●
●
●
●●
● ●● ● ●●
●
●●
●●
●●●
●
● ●
● ●● ● ● ● ●
● ●
● ● ●● ● ●● ●●
● ● ● ●
●●
● ●
● ● ● ●
● ● ● ●
●●
● ● ● ● ●● ● ●
● ●●●● ●
●● ●
●
● ● ●●
● ●
●●
● ● ●● ● ●
●
●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●
58 Sweden
●
●
● ●
●
● ●
●● ●● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ● ●● ●
●●● ● ●● ● ●● ●
● ●
●
●● ● ●● ●● ● ●● ●
● ● ● ● ●● ●
●●
● ●
●
●● ●●●
● ●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●
●●● ● ●
●●●●
●●
●●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●
●●●●●
● ●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●
● ● ●●
●
●
● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ●
●●
●
● ● ●●●● ● ● ●●●
●
● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
● ● ● ●●
●●
●
● ●● ● ● ● ●●●●● ● ●● ●● ●● ● ●●● ●● ●
●● ●●● ● ●● ●● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ●●●●● ●●● ● ●
●●
● ●
●●
●●
● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●● ●●●
● ●●
● ●● ● ●● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●● ● ●● ● ●● ● ●● ●● ●●●
● ●●
●●
● ●
●
●
● ● ●●● ●●●●●
●
●
●● ● ●● ● ●●●●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ●●● ●●●
●
●●●● ●●●●● ●●
●
● ●
●● ● ● ●●● ●
●●●●●
● ●
●●●
● ●● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● ●
●
●●●● ●●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
● ●●●●●●● ●●●
●
●
● ● ●●●
●● ● ● ●●● ●● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●●●● ● ● ●●●
●● ● ● ●● ●
●●●●●●
● ● ●
● ●●
●
● ●
● ●
● ● ●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ●●
●●
●
●● ● ●
● ●
●● ●
●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ●●● ●●●
●
● ●●
● ●
●
●
●●
● ●
●
●●●
●
●● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ●
●● ● ●●● ● ●● ●● ●●● ●
● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ●●●●●
●
●●●
● ●●● ●●● ●
●● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ●●● ● ●● ● ●●
● ●
●●●●● ● ●
●● ● ●● ●● ● ●
● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ●
●
●
●
●● ●
● ● ● ●●● ● ● ● ● ●●● ●●
●
●
● ●●
●
●
●●●●●
● ● ●● ● ●● ●
●
●●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●●● ●● ● ● ●● ●● ●
●
●●●
●●
●
●
●●
● ● ● ●● ●●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●
●●●● ● ● ●
●●●●● ● ●● ● ●●● ● ● ●●
● ● ● ● ●● ● ●●●● ●● ● ●●●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●
●
●
● ● ●●● ●
●●● ●
● ● ● ● ●● ●
●
●
●
●
●●●●
● ●●● ●
● ● ●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●● ●● ●●● ● ●● ●● ●
●●
●
● ●● ● ● ● ●
●
●
●●
● ●● ● ● ● ● ●●●●●● ●
●●●● ●
● ●● ● ● ●●● ●● ●●●●●
●●● ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●● ● ●
● ● ●●● ●● ●●● ●● ●●●● ●●● ● ●●
●● ● ● ●●●● ● ●●● ●●
●●● ● ● ● ●
● ●● ●
●
●
●●
●
● ●
●
●●
● ● ● ●● ● ●● ●●●●● ●
●
● ● ●
●● ● ●●● ●
● ●
● ● ●●● ● ●●
●
●
● ●
●● ●
● ●●
● ●
●● ● ●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●● ●● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
● ●● ● ●
● ● ● ●
●
●
●●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
● ●●●
●
●
●
●
●● ●
●●
● ●●
●● ●● ●
●●
●
●●●● ●●● ●
●
●
● ● ● ● ●●
●● ●●
● ●●
●●● ●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
● ●● ●
●
●●
● ●●●● ●
●
● ●●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●
● ● ●
●
●● ●●●● ●
●
●
●● ●
● ●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●● ● ●●●●●● ●● ●
● ●
●● ●●● ●
● ●●
●●
●
●
●●●
●● ●●●● ●
●
●
●
● ● ● ●●
●
●
●●● ●●● ●
● ●
●
●●●
●
● ●
●● ●●
● ● ● ●
● ● ●
● ● ●●
●
●
●
●
● ● ● ●
●● ● ●●
●
●
●●
● ●
●●
●
● ●
● ●● ●
● ●
● ●
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●
●
●
● ●●
● ●●
●
●
●● ●
● ●
●●
●●
● ●
●
●● ●
● ●
●
●●
● ●
● ●
●●● ●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●● ●●
●● ●
● ●
●
●
●● ●
●
●●
● ●
●●● ● ●
●
●●
●
● ●
● ● ●
●●● ●
●●
● ●
●●●
●
●●
●●
●
●
● ● ●
●● ●
● ● ● ●
●
● ●
●
●
● ●
● ●
●●●● ●● ● ● ●
● ●
●●●● ● ●
● ●● ● ●
● ● ● ●
●
●●
● ●
● ●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●
●● ●
●● ●●
● ●
● ●
●●● ●● ● ●
●
● ● ●● ●● ●
●●
●
●
● ● ● ● ●●
●●
●
●
●●●
●
●
● ●●●
●
● ● ● ●● ●
●● ●
● ●
● ●
● ● ●
● ●●
● ●
Denmark
For personal use only.
●
●
●
●
●● ●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
● ●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●●●
●
●●●
●
● ●
●●
●
●
● ●
●
● ● ●
● ●
56 North
Sea
54
Germany
6 8 10 12 14 16
Longitude (°E)
uk__ATOM__dataent_hadisst; see Rayner et al. (2006) for use of the available information to reconstruct the spatial dis-
more details). We selected SSTs from the grid cells that cov- tribution of this population during the 20th century. We con-
ered the Skagerrak–Kattegat area for the analyses. structed space–time grids at different resolution to analyze
Landings data (1903–2007) from the Skagerrak and Katte- the data and investigate this issue. The grids spanned from 2
gat were collated from official ICES sources (http://ices.dk/ to 15 years time intervals (larger time intervals were not in-
fish/catchstatistics.asp). vestigated because they are outside the life span of cod) and
from 0.01° to 0.12° (longitude–latitude) spatial resolutions.
Analysis Fine grids were represented by a high number of spatiotem-
We performed a multiscale analysis to understand if a tem- poral cells (3164 cells for the highest resolution of 2 years
poral and spatial scale that optimize the fit between the and 0.01°), while coarse grids had a low number of spatio-
model and the data can be identified, according to the main temporal cells (737 cells for the lowest resolution of 15 years
objective of describing long-term spatiotemporal dynamics and 0.12°). Then, each cell was considered as a spatiotempo-
of the cod adult population in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. ral unit of investigation where multiple observations could
Although our data set on local abundance of cod have in- occur. We explored the performances in terms of Akaike in-
formation on the year when the sampling occurred, it is not formation criterion (AIC; Akaike 1974) of a population of
obvious if an annual time step would represent an optimal generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs; Pinheiro and
Bates 2000; Wood 2006) fitted with restricted maximum like- suggesting that the temporal scale may be better defined
lihood (REML). These are regression techniques where the than the spatial scale within the space–time window investi-
relationships between dependent and independent covariates gated (Fig. 2).
are modeled with a smoothing term and therefore are desir- The model on cod distribution (Table 1) showed a positive
able in our application for their ability to model nonlinear- relationship with bottom depth up to a depth of 120 m (see
ities that often characterize biological systems. We used a online Supplemental Fig. S11). Inspection of model residuals
mixed model approach to account for changes in the spatio- revealed neither major departure from normality nor temporal
temporal dependency of the data across different resolutions and spatial autocorrelation.
with no prior averaging of the response variable. This al- Prediction maps of the historical distribution of cod in the
lowed direct comparison of the effect of different spatiotem- ENS (Fig. 3) combined information on the associated uncer-
poral scales on model goodness of fit with a selection tainty (Hengl 2007). Estimated uncertainty is lower since
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by SLU-Biblioteket on 04/30/12
criterion such as AIC. The response variable xm,y,t,k,(f,l) was mid-1970s when the IBTS started to systematically sample
the natural logarithm of local abundance of adult cod ob- the study area. Confident estimates characterize also most of
served during the month m of the year y at a particular loca- the study area until the mid-1930s, while large uncertainty is
tion f,l (identified by longitude and latitude degrees), and associated with the estimates during the decades before and
within the time–space interval t,k. The spatial distribution of after the Second World War, particularly in the southern part
Atlantic cod in the ENS was reconstructed in relation to sea- of the study area, and in the 1960s and early 1970s, before
sonality (m, month), bathymetric preference (D, depth), and the onset of IBTS.
according to the best combination of temporal and spatial A bimodal distribution, with a northern and a southern
scales identified via AIC. Observations laying within the main aggregation of adult fish, characterizes the spatial distri-
same spatiotemporal cell were not averaged but rather consid- bution of cod in the ENS (Fig. 3). They are characteristic fea-
ered as repeated measurements, and such dependency was tures of the distribution of cod in the study area, but follow
treated as a random effect. The model was specified as fol- different temporal dynamics along the century investigated.
lows: The sounthern aggregation of adult cod went through wide
fluctuations in size and abundance. The main events of con-
xm;y;t;k;ðf;lÞ ¼ a þ g½Df;l þ st0 ½f; l þ s00 ½m; t þ dy traction in the abundance and distribution of the southern ag-
For personal use only.
Fig. 2. (a) AIC surface as function of temporal and spatial scales from all the generalized additive mixed models tested and their rank and
(b) AIC profiles from the same surface. The circle, gross line, and arrow identify the model that ranked first, with a time–space resolution of
12 years and 0.06°, respectively.
(a) (b)
167 154 100 110 121 108 149 134 124 153 140 161
14 109 88 59 10 36 4 32 73 37 61 27 56
105 95 47 8 40 5 20 43 2 28 18 24
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by SLU-Biblioteket on 04/30/12
10
Time scale
AIC
8 132 119 48 26 63 25 72 77 14 66 74 67
165 163 147 104 135 87 131 151 106 146 128 138
Random effects
dy 0.532
dt,k 0.609
de 2.380
Note: Estimated equivalent degrees of freedom (EDF) (or parametric coeffi-
cients for the intercept and the random effect) are shown together with the statisti-
cal significance. Model R2 = 0.31; sample size is 4378 observations.
2007) when only 13% of the initial adult cod biomass was trial fisheries in the area, up to the last decades of extremely
left. In the Skagerrak, the stock declined largely in the end intense exploitation. These results may contribute to define
of the 1970s and early 1980s and experienced its historical historical baselines for a more objective evaluation of the sta-
minimum (i.e., approx. 20% of the estimated initial biomass) tus of cod populations in the ENS.
in the following time period (1986–1997). During the last Our analysis provided spatially explicit estimates of adult
decade, adult cod biomass in the northern area moderately in- cod biomass together with associated uncertainties and gave a
creased to 35% of the early century estimates. clear picture of the impact of poorly sampled areas and periods
on model predictions and on our ability to reconstruct the past.
Discussion We showed, through visualization and mapping, that recon-
struction of past fish distribution can be highly uncertain, but
In this study, we reconstructed the wide variations in spa- also that historical sources bring valuable information for a
tial distribution and abundance of cod in the ENS during the more correct interpretation of the present. This is of particular
last 100 years. The historical perspective given by our analy- relevance in the case of harvested populations, such as Atlantic
sis offers a unique opportunity of investigating the spatial and cod, which have experienced long histories of exploitation that
temporal dynamics of a fish species from the onset of indus- have affected their geographical distribution and abundance.
838
Fig. 3. Maps of the estimated distribution of adult cod biomass (logarithm of kg·km–2) in the eastern North Sea, with the associated standard error visualized through whitening. Bubbles
are the observed mean log-abundance in each cell and time interval.
59.0 1906 - 1913 1914 - 1925 1928 - 1937 1938 - 1947 1951 - 1961
●
●
● ● ●
● ●●
●
●
N ●
● ● ●
●
● ●●
●
58.5 ● ● ●
●● ●
●
● ● ●
● ● ● ●
● ● ● ●
● ●
● ● ● ● ● ●
●
●● ● ●
● ● ●● ●●●● ●
●● ●●● ●
● ●● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ●
●● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ● ● ●●
●
● ●● ●●● ●
● ●
●
● ● ● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ●
0 20 40 km ●
●●●● ●●● ● ●
●
● ● ● ●
● ● ●
●
●●●● ● ●
●
●●● ●●
●●● ●● ●
●●
● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
58.0 ●
● ● ●
● ● ●
● ●● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ●● ●● ● ●
●
●●● ●● ● ● ●
● ●
●
● ●● ● ●● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●
●● ● ● ●●●
●
● ●● ● ● ● ● ●
● ●● ●● ● ●
●● ● ●
●●● ● ●
● ●● ● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●● ●●●●● ●● ● ● ● ●
● ●● ●
●● ● ●
● ●
● ●
●
●
●● ●●●● ● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●● ●
● ●●● ●●●● ●
● ● ●● ●●● ● ● ●
●
● ● ●
●
● ●●●●●● ● ●●
●●
● ● ●
● ●● ● ● ●
●●●●●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●
●● Sweden ●● ●
● ●● ● ●
●●
● ● ● ● ● ● ●
●●● ●●●
●
● ●
● ● ● ●●● ●● ●
●●●●
● ● ●
● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ●
● ●●●● ● ●● ● ● ●●●
●● ● ●
●● ● ●● ●
●
57.5 ● ● ●
● ●
● ●●
● ● ●
● ● ●
●
● ●
● ●
●
●
●●●
●
● ● ●
●●●●
●● ● ● ● ●
●
●● ●
●
● ● ● ●
57.0 ●
●
● ●
●
●
● ●
● ●
● ●
●
●● ● ● ●
●
●●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●● ● ●
56.5 ● ●● ● ●●
●
● ● ● ●
Denmark
56.0
● ●
● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●
● ● ● ●
●● ●● ●
●
● ●
●● ● ● ● ●
Latitude (°N)
●● ● ●
●●● ●●● ●●
● ● ● ●
●
58.5 ● ●● ● ●
● ● ●
●●● ●
●
● ●●
● ● ● ●
● ●
● ● ●
●●
● ●
● ●
●
●● ●●
● ● ●
● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ●
●
● ● ● ●
●● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ●●
● ● ●
● ●●●● ●
●
●
●
● ●
● ●● ● ● ● ●
4.46
● ● ● ● ●●
● ● ●
●
● ● ● ●●● ●●
● ● ●
58.0 ●● ● ● ●
●● ●●● ●
● ●
●●●
●
● ● ●● ●
●● ●●
●
● ●● ●● ● ●
●● ●● ● ●
● ●
●
● ● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ●● ●●● ● ●●● ●
●●●● ●
● ● ●
●●● ●● ●
●
●● ● ●●
● ●
●
● ●
● ●●● ●
● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ●
● ●● ● ● ● ●● ●
● ●
●
● ● ●●
● ●● ●● ●
● ● ●
● ●● ●
● ●● ●●● ● ●● ●
●
●
●●
● ●
● ● ●
● ●●● ●● ●
57.5 ● ● ●
● ● ●
● ● ● ●
● ●● ●● ● ●
●
2.9
●
● ● ● ● ●
●● ● ●
● ● ●
● ● ●● ●
log(cpue)
●
● ●
● ● ●
●
● ● ●● ●● ●● ●
●
●● ● ● ● ● ●
●
●● ●
● ●
●●
● ●
● ● ● ● ●
● ● ● ●
57.0 ● ● ●● ●● ● ● ●
● ●● ●● ● ● ● ●
● ●
●● ● ●● ●● ●
●●
●● ● ● ●●● ● ●●
● ●● ●●
● ●
● ●
-0.54
●
● ● ● ●●●
● ● ●
●●
● ● ●
● ●
●● ● ●
● ●● ●
●● ● ● ●●●
56.5 ● 0.15 0.45 1.01
● ●
● ● ●
●● ● ● ●● ●
● ● ●
●
●●
● se
56.0
9 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 13
Longitude (°E)
Fig. 4. (a) Average sea surface temperature (SST, 1902–2007) in the was studied at a resolution of 12 years and 0.06°, an increase
study area; vertical dashed lines identify the 12-year time resolution in predictability of the spatial dynamics was observed, as de-
of the analysis. Estimated adult cod biomass in the Skagerrak (b) tected by a minimum in the AIC. At the current stage of
and Kattegat (c) parts of the study area along the 20th century and understanding and with the available data, we cannot inter-
commercial landing time series disaggregated for Sweden (continu- pret the spatiotemporal scale identified as the result of under-
ous lines) and Denmark (dashed line). Shaded vertical bands indi- lying ecological processes (i.e., numerical dominance of
cate the two world wars. particularly strong year classes, spatial resolution of aggrega-
11.0 tive phases such as spawning aggregations). Thus, the resolu-
(a)
SST (°C)
Landings (103 t)
pean plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) (Cardinale et al. 2011). At however, technological advancement may become relevant
that time the landings were rapidly increasing as a conse- when analysing long time series of data collected under the
quence of the developing trawl fishery in the area (http://ices. potential effect of increasing catching efficiency (Cardinale
dk/fish/catchstatistics.asp), but the biomass harvested was still et al. 2010). Under the reasonable assumption of constant
moderate compared with the rest of the time series. Other rea- catching efficiency within the 12-year time resolution of our
sons likely influenced the low values of cod abundance ob- analysis, the estimated spatial structure of cod would not be
served during the 1920s in the ENS and protracted to the affected by unaccounted technological creep. On the contrary,
1930s in the Skagerrak, such as a low contribution from the the temporal decrease in the estimated adult cod biomass can
North Sea stock, as suggested by our reconstruction of the be assumed to be an underestimation of the real decline of
spatial distribution. It is also important to note that the period these cod stocks.
around the 1920s recorded the lowest average temperatures of The progressive decrease in the availability of marine nat-
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by SLU-Biblioteket on 04/30/12
the whole century, and ultimately, we may not exclude unac- ural resources has spurred the need of increasing efficiency
counted variations in the catchability for this period. Interest- and effort of harvesting to maintain elevated catches and
ingly, plankton samples collected by Danish scientists during profits (Hilborn and Walters 1992). This has contributed to
the first half of the century in the Kattegat showed a similar the unnoticed dramatic decline of huge populations, which
latitudinal temporal pattern in the abundance of cod eggs and were believed to be inexhaustible (Roberts 2007). Under-
larvae (Knudsen 1953). They found that during the 1930s, the standing local decline of natural populations is of outmost
central and southern Kattegat had higher relative densities of importance when discussing conservation and management
early life stages of cod than the northern Kattegat (Knudsen of oceanic resources, because it is at local scale that mecha-
1953), a possible result of a lower contribution from the adja- nisms of population regulation and, ultimately, extinction op-
cent Skagerrak during that period. Moreover, consistent with erate (Cowlishaw et al. 2009). Our reconstruction showed
our estimates of a high adult cod biomass during the war and that the decrease of cod abundance in the ENS occurred
postwar period, exceptionally high abundance of cod eggs and with a loss of spatial structure, which taken together with a
larvae were observed in the Kattegat during the early 1950s philopatric behaviour of the coastal cod populations (Sve-
(Knudsen 1953). däng et al. 2007) may represent an important limit for the re-
A rapid decrease of cod biomass was estimated for the last covery of cod in this area.
For personal use only.
variability in patterns of population declines: the importance of Pinheiro, J.C., and Bates, D.M. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and
local processes in species extinction. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Sci. 276(1654): 63–69. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0767. Pinnegar, J.K., and Engelhard, G.H. 2008. The shifting baseline
Cushing, D.H. 1984. The gadoid outburst in the North Sea. J. Cons. phenomenon: a global perspective. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 18(1): 1–
Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, 41: 159–166. 16. doi:10.1007/s11160-007-9058-6.
Goodwin, B.J., and Fahrig, L. 1998. Spatial scaling and animal Pitcher, T.J. 2001. Fisheries managed to rebuild ecosystems? Recon-
population dynamics. Columbia University Press, New York, structing the past to salvage the future. Ecol. Appl. 11(2): 601–617.
USA. pp. 193–206. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0601:FMTRER]2.0.CO;2.
Haneson, V., and Rencke, K. 1923. Bohusfisket. Skrifter utgivna till Rayner, N.A., Brohan, P., Parker, D.E., Folland, C.K., Kennedy, J.J.,
Göteborgs stads trehundrarsjubileum genom Jubileumsutstllnin- Vanicek, M., Ansell, T., and Tett, S.F.B. 2006. Improved analyses
gens publikationskommitt, XIX, Göteborg, Sweden. of changes and uncertainties in sea surface temperature measured
Hengl, T. 2007. A practical guide to geostatistical mapping of in situ since the mid-nineteenth century: the HadSST2 data set.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by SLU-Biblioteket on 04/30/12
environmental variables. Vol. EUR 22904 EN of JRC Scientific J. Clim. 19(3): 446–469. doi:10.1175/JCLI3637.1.
and Technical Reports. Office for Official Publications of the Roberts, C. 2007. The unnatural history of the sea. Island Press,
European Communities, JRC Ispra, Italy. Washington, D.C., USA.
Hilborn, R., and Walters, C.J. 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock Rogers, L.A., Stige, L.C., Olsen, E.M., Knutsen, H., Chan, K.-S., and
assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, Stenseth, N.C. 2011. Climate and population density drive changes
New York, USA. in cod body size throughout a century on the Norwegian coast.
ICES. 1992. Manual for international bottom trawl surveys, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(5): 1961–1966. doi:10.1073/
revision iv. Technical report, ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark. pnas.1010314108. PMID:21245301.
ICES. 2009. Report of the ICES advisory committee 2009. Technical Rosenberg, A.A., Bolster, W.J., Alexander, K.E., Leavenworth, W.B.,
report, ICES, Copenhagen, Denmark. Cooper, A.B., and McKenzie, M.G. 2005. The history of ocean
ICES. 2010. Report of the study group on the history of fish and resources: modeling cod biomass using historical records. Front.
fisheries (SGHIST). Technical report, ICES, 14 October 2010, Ecol. Environ, 3(2): 78–84. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003
Ponza, Italy. [0078:THOORM]2.0.CO;2.
Knudsen, J. 1953. Contribution to the biology of the cod (Gadus Svedäng, H. 2003. The inshore demersal fish community on the
callarias L.) in the Danish waters. Technical report, Conseil Swedish Skagerrak coast: regulation by recruitment from offshore
For personal use only.