Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 65

Descente de charges

Denys Comilog
Moanda, Gabon

LARGEUR 8.220 m
LONGUEUR 14.400 m
HAUTEUR 1.300m (6.800 m)
Pente de toiture 10.00 deg
Entredistance des ossatures 5.000 m
Code des charges France
Revêtement de façade Wall girts + TR45 (0.08 kN/m2)
Revêtement de toiture Roof purlins + TR45 (0.08 kN/m2)
Charge d'entretien 0.20 kN/m2
Altitude 0.000 m
Zone de vent 1
Vitesse de vent 22.000 m/s
Exposition au vent II
Charge sismique 0.040 g
Classe de bâtiment 2
N° de projet ax2200285
Date 14.04.2022

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 1/65


Projet ax2200285 Denys Comilog

Titres qui sont marqués en gras, se réfèrent aux forces de réactions de la structure sur la fondation.

Table de matière 2
Plan d'ancrage 4
1. Données de bases 5
1.1. Géométrie du bâtiment 5
1.2. Données climatologiques 7
2. Charges 11
2.1. Charges permanentes 11
2.2. Charges de neige 11
2.3. Charges de vent 15
2.3.1. Pression dynamique 15
2.3.2. Actions extérieures exercées par le vent 17
2.3.3. Actions intérieures exercées par le vent 21
2.3.4. Actions de frottement 22
2.4. Séisme 24
2.5. Charge d'entretien 25
3. Combinaisons de charges 26
4. Charges sur portiques 29
4.1. Charges permanentes 29
4.2. Charges d'entretien 29
4.3. Charges de neige 29
4.4. Charges de vent 29
4.5. Charges des actions sismiques 33
5. Poteaux pignons 35
5.1. Données géométriques des poteaux 35
5.2. Charge de vent sur pignons 37
6. Croix de St. André 39
6.1. Recapitulation des actions de vent sur façades pignons 39
6.1.1. Actions extérieures sur façades pignons 39
6.1.2. Actions intérieures sur façades pignons 39
6.1.3. Actions sur acrotères pignons 39
6.2. Calcul des efforts a prendre aux croix de St. André 40
6.2.1. Surfaçe contribuant à l'axe longitudinale de: Type 1 41
6.3. Efforts à prendre aux croix de St. André 42
6.3.1. Surfaces effectuées 42

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 2/65


6.3.2. Forces de frottements 42
6.3.3. Vent frontal 43
6.3.4. Vent latéral 43
6.4. Forces de réactions additionelles due aux croix de St. André 44
6.4.1. Vent frontal 44
6.4.2. Vent latéral 44
7. Résultats du logiciel StrEngS 45
7.1. Vue générale 46
7.2. Nœuds 46
7.3. Appuis 47
7.4. Charges sur éléments 49
7.5. Charges locales 59
7.6. Cas de charges 60
7.7. Combinaisons de charges 61
7.8. Forces de réactions 62
Annexe informative A: Résumé des forces de réactions sur fondation 'Type A' 64
Annexe informative B: Résumé des forces de réactions sur fondation 'Type B' 65
Annexe informative C: Résumé des forces de réactions sur fondation 'Type C' 66

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 3/65


Détail D1
Coupe Coupe

... Boulons d'expansion


01,06 ...
2xM20x160 mm
200 300 200 200

85 215
Boulons d'expansion 382.5 +5
-15 382.5 +5
-15
2xM20x160 mm

70 70
200

ø100 mm

200

412
200
01,06
A
300

D2 - Type A D2 - Type B D2 - Type B D2 - Type A

Boulons d'expansion
CONTREVENTEMENT

3950
2xM20x160 mm
400
200 200

8300

7900
D1 - Type C D1 - Type C

3950
Remarque : Dimensions manquantes à déterminer par une étude d'ingénieur en béton

1/10

CONTREVENTEMENT
Détail D2 B
Coupe Coupe

200
D2 - Type A D2 - Type B D2 - Type B D2 - Type A

200

412
2xM20/8.8 2xM20/8.8
02-05 A-B Lb = 250 mm Lb = 250 mm 02-05 ø100 mm
Ltot = 330 mm Ltot = 330 mm 285 4100 4100 4900 285
200 200 200 200
200 13670 200
2xM20/8.8 Δ Δ
100
Lb = 250 mm 382.5 +5
-15 382.5 +5
-15 14070
Ltot = 330 mm M20 / 8.8

70 70
01 02 03 04 05 06
PLAN DE
Δ= ±3 mm FONDATION
200

400

A-B
Δ
Δ

400
Plan de ancrage Check work preparation Check sales
AD-fo1951 Détails

FRISOHALL 10_FC-FR largeur: 8.22 m


hauteur: 1.3 m
Remarque : Dimensions manquantes à déterminer par une étude d'ingénieur en béton
longueur: 14 m
1/10

client: Denys
Moanda Gabon

Frisomat Sud date: 14/04/2022


Z.A. de Fiancey
échelle: 1/100 - 1/10
F-26250 LIVRON
projet nr: ax2200285
tel: +33 4 75 61 00 67
fax: +33 4 75 61 00 27 commande:
e-mail: infovalence@frisomat.fr KAG 2.
Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1. Basic input data


1.1. Building geometry
1.1.1. General geometrical info

Building shape:

Roof slope:

α  10  deg
nominal building dimensions
single building width W  8.22m length L  14.4m
total width (sum coupled building Wtot  W Frame distance A  5m
widths)
height H  6.8m number of frames nFrames  2.68

1.1.2. Sheeting
Wall: Roof:
Isofaç  0mm Isoroof  0mm

kN kN
gdiv_faç  0 gdiv_roof  0
2 2
m m

purlin distance wall pd_wall  1.875m roof_horizontal projection pdH_roof  1.5m


(set to 0 if no purlins)
bacfaç  "Z120 + TR45" bacroof  "Z120 + TR45"
Hyperstatic factor:
αhyp_faç  1.10 αhyp_roof  1.10

Should be altered for 2-span SW-panels Should be set to 1.25 if there is only 3 frames,
or cassettes. 1.10 if there is only 4 frames. Also in case of
2-span TR106.
1.1.3. Openings  "Wall" "Openings (m²)" "Permanent/Accidental" 
 
All kinds of openings, 2
"Front" 0m "" 
indicate if permanent (P) or  
accidental (A). Default if no
O faç   "Back" 
2
0m ""
information is known:  
0m² - "P"  2 
 "Left" 0m ""

 2 
"Right" 0m "" 

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 5/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1.1.4. Outside building dimensions

Cladding width Wcladding  185  mm WcladdingROOF  167.545  mm

Width (outside dimension): WOD  8.59 m (gable end


direction)
Total width (outside dimension): WODtot  8.59 m

Length (outside dimension): L OD  14.66 m

Gutter level: HG  6.968 m

Ridge level: HR  7.73 m

acrotere/parapet height only >0 in case of flat hp  0 m


roof

Surface side wall: SLP  HG  LOD SLP  102.1 m 2


1
Surface gable end: SP 
2
 
 HG  HR  WOD SP  63.1 m 2
WOD
Surface roof: SR 
cos ( α)
 L OD SR  127.9 m 2
2
Ground Surface Sground  WOD  LOD Sground  125.9 m

Frame weight 1 span GFrame  2kN first estimation to compute the


seismic load
Building orientation ridge:
gable end seen from North direction: BO=0 deg,
gable end seen from East direction: BO=90 deg,
gable end seen from South direction: BO=180 deg,
gable end seen from West direction: BO=-90 deg,
variation from -90 deg till 90 deg

BO  45deg

directions for lateral wind


latwinddir  "NE-SW"

directions for frontal wind

frontwinddir  "NW-SE"

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 6/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1.2. Climatic data


country  "FR2008"
1.2.1. Altitude

Altitude Alt  0m
Nc
Fa
Ea
Ntu
1
9r
9
1
-
1
-
/do
3
Ned
A
:
2e
0gt
0ei
7
:pp
Aoa
nuc
nrt
e
xu
e
:ew
Va
a
r
i
a
t
i
oee
n>d
d2v
e0.
a0
l
c
h
a
r
g
e
r
c
éd
i
s
t
i
q
un
e

nr
i

n
l
t
i
t
u
de

m
a
l
t
i
t
e
h
a
s

i
e
c
m

o
n
i
n
d
s
p

k
0

1.2.2. Reference period

50years

( zonesRefPerR)  ("r50" )
1
Lifetime  50 Pn 
Lifetime
1.2.3. Snowzone "20kg service load" 
 
 "45kg region A1 " 
 
z0
 "45kg region A2 " 
A1  "55kg region B1 " 
A2  
B1 ( zonesSnowR)   "55kg region B2 " 
B2
 
 "65kg region C1 "
C1

 "65kg region C2 " 
kN  
Snowzone_NAME  "z0"
 
sk  0 
2  "90kg region D " 
m  
 "140kg region E" 
NM
Fa
Ep
NA
9n
1
9
1
-
1
-
3
2t
:
0b
0l
4e
n
e
x
A
,
a

A
.
1
A
.
2

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 7/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1.2.4. Importancy/ consequence class

default

zonesImportancyR  ("default option for importancy or consequence class" )

consequence factor KFI  1

γimpWind  1 γimpSnow  1 γimpSeisme  1


Ec
No
1
9s
9e
8
-
4
.
2
.
5e
Ic
ml
ps
o
r
t
aC
nC
c
y1
c
l
a
s
s
e
sn
I
,
I
I
,C
I
I
Ir
o
rs
I
Ve
cc
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
m
o
r
e
o
r
l
e
s
s
t
o
n
q
u
e
n
c
a
s
e
s

,
C
C
2
a
d
C
3
e
p
t
i
v
e
l
y

1.2.5. Snow exposure

se1
se2  "(1) cas normal" 
zonesSnowExR   
"(1.25) abri permanente, pas de déplacement par le vent" 

Snow exposure coefficient: Cex_snow  1


SnowExzone  1
N
F
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
3
/
N
A
:
2
0
0
7
:
c
l
a
u
s
e
5
.
2
(
7
)
t
a
b
l
e
a
u
5
.
1
a
d
a
p
t
é

1.2.6. Accidental snow

z-

zonesSnowAccR  ("no accidental snow" )

SnowAcczone  1
multiplicator accidental snow sacc_m  0
n
o
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
o
r
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
n
o
w
z
o
n
e

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 8/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1.2.7. Windzone
 "22m/s region 1 " 
 
 "24m/s region 2 " 
z1  "26m/s region 3 "

z2  
z3
z4
 "28m/s region 4 " 
z5 zonesWindR   
z6 "36m/s region 5 (Guadeloupe)" 
 "17m/s region 6 (Guyane)" 
 
 "32m/s region 7 (Martinique)" 
reference wind speed:
 
m
 "34m/s region 8 (Réunion)" 
zonesWindWindzone 1  "z1" vk0  22
s
basic wind pressure
kN
qb0  0.296 
2
m
NT
Fa
Eb
Ne
1
9.
9
1
-
1
-
4
/a
Nn
A
:F
mi
a
r
sr
24
0.
03
8(
l
4
2
(
N
A
)
d
g
u
e

N
A
)
,
a
n
d
T
a
b
l
e
4
.
3
(
N
A
)
a
n
d
T
a
b
l
e
4
.
4
(
N
A
)
1.2.8. Wind exposure / terrain categorie

 "-0)Mer ou zone côtière exposée aux vents de mer " 


 
 "-II)Rase campagne, avec ou non quelques obstacles isolés" 
zonesWindExR   "-IIIa)Campagne avec des haies; vignobles; bocage" 
 
 "-IIIb)Zones urbanisées ou industrielles; bocage dense; vergers" 
 
"-IV)Zones urbaines dont ou moins 15% de la surface sont recouverts de bâtements" 

ex0
exII
exIIIa
exIIIb
exIV

WindExzone  2 z0  0.05  m zmin  2 m

NF EN 1991-1-4/NA:2008: Tableau 4.1(NA) Catégories et paramètres de terrain

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 9/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1.2.9. Seismic zone

"g=0.04, seisme tres faible" 


z-  
s2
s3
 "g=0.07, seisme faible" 
s4 zonesSeismeR   "g=0.11, seisme modéré" 
s5  
 "g=0.16, seisme moyen" 
 
 "g=0.31, seisme fort" 
ground acceleration NF EN 1998-1/NA: Décembre 2007
ag  0.04

1.2.10. Ground type

A
B
C
D
E

ground type

B:
Deposits of very dense sand, gravel or very stiff clay, at least
tens of metres in thickness, characterised by a gradual increas
of mechanical properties with depth

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 10/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

2. Loads

2.1. Permanent loads

Walls: Roof:
2 2
Dead load secondary gstr_faç  0.022  kN  m gstr_roof  0.029  kN  m
elements:
(Purlin/Cassette/Steeldeck)
2 2
Dead load sheeting: gbac_faç  0.065  kN  m gbac_roof  0.065  kN  m
2 2
Dead load insulation: giso_faç  0  kN  m giso_roof  0  kN  m
2 2
Dead load divers sheeting: gdiv_faç  0  kN  m gdiv_roof  0  kN  m

2 2
gtot_faç  0.087  kN  m gtot_roof  0.094  kN  m

g.div is sheeting related load and is included in the general permanent load G
g.add is non sheeting related, for example solar panels, interior elements as lights or equipment, this is
split in additional permanent load G.add to have the possibility to adapt the combination factors
seperately if needed
2 2
gadd_faç  0kN  m gadd_roof  0kN  m

Total dead load:

     
Gtotal  SR  gtot_roof  gadd_roof   2 SLP  SP  gtot_faç  gadd_faç  GFrame  nFrames
  
Gtotal  46.185  kN

2.2. Snow loads


Snowzone zonesSnowSnowzone 1  "z0"
Altitude: ( Alt)  0

basic snow value kN


sk  0 
2
m
Nb
oe
s
no
om
w
l
ot
ah
de
t
or
c
oc
n
s
i
dr
e
rv
f
o
rl
t
ha
ed
c
h
o
s
e
n
z
o
n
e
,
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
l
o
a
d
c
e
s

c
i
t
i
a
l
g
a
i
t
y
o

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 11/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

FR2008
N
F
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
3
/
N
A
:
2
0
0
7
:
A
n
n
e
x
e
:
V
a
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
c
h
a
r
g
e
c
a
r
a
c
t
é
r
i
s
t
i
q
u
e
p
o
u
r
u
n
e
a
l
t
i
t
u
d
e
>
2
0
0
m
A
Δs1 ( A)   0.20m if 200m  A  500m
1000

1.50  A
 0.45m if 500.m  A  1000.m
1000

3.50  A
 2.45m if 1000.m  A  2000.m
1000

0m otherwise

1.50  A
Δs2 ( A)   0.30m if 200m  A  500m
1000

3.50  A
 1.30m if 500.m  A  1000.m
1000

7 A
 4.80m if 1000.m  A  2000.m
1000

0m otherwise

SAlt_FR2008 ( A  Zs)  sk  0 if A  200  m

kN
Δs2 ( A)  if Zs = "E"
3
m
kN
Δs1 ( A)  otherwise s
3
m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 12/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

 kN 
s0a_FR2008 ( Zs)   0 if Zs = "A1" 
2
 m 
 
 kN 
1 if Zs = "A2"
 2 
m
 
 kN 
 1 if Zs = "B1" 
2
 m 
 
 kN 
1.35 if Zs = "B2"
 2 
 m 
 kN 
 0 if Zs = "C1" 
2
 m 
 
 kN 
1.35 if Zs = "C2"
 2 
 m 
 kN 
 1.8 if Zs = "D" 
 2 
m
 
 kN 
0 if Zs = "E"  Zs = "z0"
 2 
 m  sacc  s0a_FR2008 ( Snowzone_NAME )

FR2008

kN ( Alt)  0
sAlt ( Alt)  0 
2 Snowzone_NAME  "z0"
m
Thermal coefficient: Ct  1
Exposure coefficient: Cex_snow  1

Exposure importance factor for γimpSnow  1


snow action
lifetime reduction snow

V  0.7
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
3
:
A
n
n
e
x
D
:
f
o
r
m
u
l
e
D
1
(
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
e
u
r
o
c
o
d
e
)

cprob_S  1 if Pn = 0.02
cprob_S  1
6
1  V
π
  
 ln ln 1  Pn   0.57222
otherwise
1  2.5923  V

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 13/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Snow load total: 


stot  γimpSnow  cprob_S  Ct  Cex_snow  sAlt ( Alt)  stot  0 
kN
2
m
kN
Accidental snow sacc  0 
2
m
Multiplication factor for the transformation of snow load in accidental load :
γNa  sacc_m if zonesSnowAccR  "" γNa  0.000
 sacc 
 
Default shape coefficients
 stot 
 
μ1 ( α)  0.8 if 0  α  30deg α
μ2 ( α)  0.8  0.8  if 0  α  30deg
30deg
60deg  α
0.8  if 30  α  60deg
30deg 1.6 if 30  α  60deg

0 otherwise 0 otherwise
weight uniform snow on roof Stotal  Sground  stot  μ1 ( α)  0  kN

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 14/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

2.3. Wind loads


2.3.1. Peak velocity pressure

Windzone zonesWindWindzone 1  "z1"

Altitude factor AltEffect  "altitude has no direct impact on windspeed v.k0" calt  1

m 2
characteristic windspeed: vk0  22 qb0  0.296  kN  m
s

lifetime reduction K  0.15 n  0.5 life_wind  "4.2 (2)P note 5"


wind
 
 1  K  ln ln 1  Pn 
cprob   
 n

cprob  1
 1  K  ln ( ln ( 0.98) ) 
zonesWindExRWindExzone  1  "-II)Rase campagne, avec ou non quelques obstacles isolés"

directional factor: cdir  1

seasonal factor: cseason  1

reference wind speed: vb  cdir  cseason  cprob  vk0


3
air density: ρ  1.225  kg  m

reference dynamic wind 1 2 kN


qb  calt   ρ  vb qb  0.296 
pressure: 2 2
m
roughness length: z0  0.05 m
minimal length: zmin  2.0 m z.max is set to 200m for all terrain
maximal length:  max
z  200  m categories

minum heigth to count for zmin_fR  max  HR  zmin zmin_fR  7.735 m


roof: (ridge height)

minum heigth to count for


wall: (gutter height)

zmin_fG  max HG  zmin  zmin_fG  6.968 m

orography condition flat terrain or slope <5%!

orography factor: c0z  1.0

0.07
 z0 
terrain factor (roughness): kr  0.19   
 0.05  m 
kr  0.190

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 15/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

 z
roughness factor: crZ_f ( z)  kr  ln  
z default Eurocode
 0
6
4
  z0  
turbulence factor: kl  1  2  10   log    3 kl  0.995
  m 
kl

E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
§
4
.
4
f
o
r
m
u
l
e
4
.
7
turbulence intensity: Iv_f ( z) 
 z
c0z  ln  
z
 0

 
crZ_f zmin_fR  0.958   2  0.918
crZ_f zmin_fR

crZ_f  zmin_fG  0.938 crZ_f  zmin_fG  0.88


2

m
average windspeed: vm_f ( z)  crZ_f ( z)  c0z  vb vm_f  zmin_fR  21.1
s

average dynamic
windpressure:
2
qm_f ( z)  crZ_f ( z)  c0z  qb
2
 
qm_f zmin_fR  272 Pa

turbulence intensity: 
Iv_f zmin_fR  0.197   
Iv_f zmin_fG  0.202

1
exposure factor:
1  7  Iv_f zmin_fR  2  ρ  vm_f zmin_fR 2
cez_R 
qb

1
1  7  Iv_f zmin_fG  2  ρ  vm_f zmin_fG 2
cez_F  default Eurocode
qb

Exposure importancy factor for wind action

γimpWind  1 cez_R  2.185 cez_F  2.121

2
peak velocity pressure roof qpZ_r  γimpWind  cez_R  qb qpZ_r  0.648  kN  m

2
peak velocity pressure wall: qpZ_f  γimpWind  cez_F  qb qpZ_f  0.629  kN  m

2
right side wall (different for monopitch) qpZ_f_RM  0.629  kN  m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 16/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
7
.
2
2
t
a
b
l
e
a
u
7
.
1
,
f
i
g
u
r
e
7
.
5
2.3.2. External wind actions

Dimensions.

WOD  8.59 m L OD  14.66 m

lateral wind :

hL  HR hL  7.73 m  hL 
dL  WODtot dL  8.59 m  λ 
 L

dL 
λL  0.9
 

eL  min L OD  2  hL  eL  14.66 m
Front wind

hF  HR hF  7.73 m
 hF 
dF  L OD dF  14.66 m  λ 
 F

dF 
λF  0.528
 

eF  min WODtot  2  hF  eF  8.59 m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 17/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Recommended values for external pressure coefficients on walls


lateral wind
Zone D: cp10D_L  0.787
Zone E:  
cp10E_L  0.473
Zone B:  p10B_L  0.800
c
Zone A: cp10A_L  1.200
Extend zone A
  eL 
 eA_L  if eL  5  dL   dL 
  5 
eA_L  2.932 m
front wind:
Zone D: cp10D_F  0.737
Zone E: cp10E_F  0.374
Zone B: cp10B_F  0.800
Zone A: cp10A_F  1.200
Extend zone A

  eF 
 eA_F  if eF  5  dF   dF
  5 

eA_F  1.718 m

Remark: taking into account the lack of correlation between the aerodynamic pressures in the wind
and downwind following EN 1991-1-4 section 7.2.2. (3) we obtain the following reductions:
correlation  0.85
ξL  1 if λL  5 ξF  1 if λF  5

correlation if λL  1 correlation if λF  1

correlation 
λL  1  0.15 otherwise correlation 
λF  1  0.15 otherwise
51 51

cred_sidewind if country = "CH" cred_frontwind if country = "CH"

 
ξL  0.85 ξF  0.85

cp10D_L  ξL  cp10D_L cp10D_L  0.669 cp10D_F  ξF  cp10D_F cp10D_F  0.626

cp10E_L  ξL  cp10E_L cp10E_L  0.402 cp10E_F  ξF  cp10E_F cp10E_F  0.318

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 18/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

single building roof wind

Recommended values for external pressure


coefficients on roof
lateral wind

Extend zone F
eL
 1.466 m
10

eL
 3.665 m
4

ref  "figure 7.8a, table 7.4a"

cp10F_neg_L  1.3 cp10F_pos_L  0.1

cp10G_neg_L  1 cp10G_pos_L  0.1

cp10H_neg_L  0.45 cp10H_pos_L  0.1

cp10I_neg_L  0.5
cp10I_pos_L  0

cp10J_neg_L  0.8 cp10J_pos_L  0.1

right side wind (difference for monopitch roof)


cp10F_neg_L_180  1.3
cp10F_pos_L_180  0.1

cp10G_neg_L_180  1
cp10G_pos_L_180  0.1

cp10H_neg_L_180  0.45
cp10H_pos_L_180  0.1

cp10I_neg_L_180  0.5 cp10I_pos_L_180  0

cp10J_neg_L_180  0.8 cp10J_pos_L_180  0.1

single building roof wind

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 19/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

single building roof wind

Front wind

eF  8.59 m

image_roof_F
ref  "figure 7.8b, table 7.4b"
cp10F_neg_F  1.45

cp10F_neg_F_low  1.45 different for monopitch roof

cp10G_neg_F  1.3

cp10H_neg_F  0.65

cp10I_neg_F  0.55

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 20/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

background & detail internal wind

2.3.3. Internal wind actions

E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
§
7
.
2
.
9
(
6
)
:
N
o
t
e
2
Internal wind coeffficients for building where the openings are not known:
(Equal distribution of openings along all sides assumed) cpi_NEG  0.3
(Equal distribution of openings along 2 sides assumed) cpi_POS  0.2
Openings in the building:
 "Wall" "Openings (m²)" "Permanent/Accidental" 
 
"Front" 0 "" 
 
Ofaç   "Back"

0 "" 

 "Left" 0 "" 
 
"Right" 0 ""  0  
"Front" 
Ratio of openings in each wall compared 0    "Back" 
to the total surface of the respective wall:  
RatioO     
0    "Left" 
Number of walls where the surface of the 0   "Right" 
openings is larger than 30% of the total surface of the wall:    
(In case this number is equal to or larger than 2, ( Isolated)  0
the building should be considered as a free standing roof)
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
§
7
.
2
.
9
(
2
)

link to windload on canopy / free standing roof

Internal pressure is detemined based on the openings in


each wall. In case of a dominant opening, the internal 0  
"Front" 
pressure will be taken as 0.75 cpe (formula 7.1) or 0.90 cpe 0    "Back" 
(formula 7.2). This depends on the ratio of the openings of  
RatioPerm     
the respective wall compared to the sum of openings of 0    "Left" 
the rest of the building. These ratios are: 0   "Right" 
   
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
§
7
.
2
.
9
(
4
)
&
§
7
.
2
.
9
(
5
)

In case there is no dominant wall and all openings


are known, Figure 7.13 is used to determine the
internal pressure for each direction of the wind.
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
§
7
.
2
.
9
(
6
)

Lateral wind: cpi_neg_L  0.3


cpi_pos_L  0.2
Front
wind:
cpi_neg_F  0.3
cpi_pos_F  0.2 Figure 7.13

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 21/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Accidental situation: large door that is opened, ...


E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
7
.
2
.
9
(
4
)
&
§
7
.
2
.
9
(
5
)
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
7
.
2
c
p
i
=
0
.
9
*
c
p
e
Windload in case of open door (accidental situation):
lateral wind
side opening at wind side
cp10D_L
cpi_pos_acc_L  0.90 
ξL
 AOL
cpi_pos_acc_L  0
side or front opening at leeward side
 cp10E_L 
cpi_neg_acc_L  min  0.90   AO L  0.90  cp10B_L  AO F


ξL 

cpi_neg_acc_L  0
front wind
front opening at wind side
cp10D_F
cpi_pos_acc_F  0.90 
ξF
 AOF
cpi_pos_acc_F  0
side or front opening at leeward side
 cp10E_F 
cpi_neg_acc_F  min  0.90   AO F  0.90  cp10B_F  AO L


ξF 

cpi_neg_acc_F  0
Wind load - open building

2.3.4. Friction

Non affected distance in longitudinal direction (Ln_e):


L fr_n_e  min 2  WODtot  4  HR 
Affected length in longitudinal direction (Lfr):


L fr  if L OD  Lfr_n_e  0  0  L OD  Lfr_n_e 
L fr  0 m

Reference areas for wall and roof:


 Afr_faç 
 
2  L fr  HG 

 2 
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
4
:
§
7
.
5
:
F
i
g
u
r
e
7
.
2
2

2
 WOD 
Afr_roof  2  Lfr  
 2 

  HR  HG 2

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 22/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Ec
No
9f
1
9
1
-
1
-
:s
4
§
7
.
5
:T
TR
as
b
l
ee
7
.
1
0e
fe
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
Friction coefficient:

e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
f
o
r

t
e
l
s
h
t
i
n
g
cfr  0.04
Total friction force, to be taken by windbracings:


Ffr  cfr  qpZ_f  Afr_faç  qpZ_r  Afr_roof  Ffr  0  kN

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 23/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

FR2008
2.4. Seismic loads

E
N
1
9
9
8
-
1
/
N
A
:
2
0
1
0
§
3
.
2
.
1
(
1
)
ag  0.04
Reference peak ground acceleration for type A ground:

Importance class:

E
N
1
9
9
8
-
1
/
N
A
:
2
0
1
0
§
4
.
2
.
5
(
5
)
zonesImportancyR  ("default option for importancy or consequence class" )

Tr
ae
b
l
em
4
.
3
:
In
md
pe
o
r
t
aa
n
c
es
c
l
a
s
s
e
s
f
o
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
-
E
N
c
o
m
e

d
v
l
u
e
o
f
g
I
default class 2 for normal use

E
N
1
9
9
8
-
1
:
2
0
0
4
§
2
.
1
(
4
)
Importance factor: γimpSeisme  1
E
N
1
9
9
8
-
1
:
2
0
0
4
§
3
.
2
.
1
(
4
)
ag  0 if  
IsNaN ag
m
γimpSeisme  ag g otherwise ag  0.392
2
s
E
N
1
9
9
8
-
1
:
2
0
0
4
§
3
.
1
.
2
(
1
)
-
T
a
b
l
e
3
.
1
Soil type: ( Soil)  "B"

Smax  1.2


S2  S ag  Smax  S2  1.2

No application for very low seismicity cases, maximum acceleration a.g:


thresholds of very low seismicity
agmax  0.04
agSmax  0

lowSeism  "True" if ag  agmax  g  ag  S2  agSmax  g


lowSeism  "True"
"False" otherwise

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 24/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

2.5. Imposed loads on roofs

NF P06-111-2, NF EN 1991-1-1/NA: juin 2004

The table of EN is replaced by the Table given in NF EN, only structural check (ULS)

Category H: roofs not accessible except for normal maintenance and repair

Minimum roof surface to take into account for the calculation of the maintenance load (cat H):

2
Smin  10 m
"alfa [deg]" "distributed load [kN/m^2]" 
 0 0.8 
Distributed load: Mq   
 8.531 0.8 
 α  kN  8.531 0 
qk  linterpol  Mq  1    
 deg  2
m
kN
qk  0.2 
2
m
Equivalent point load to take into account:
Q k  1.5  kN

This point load could be positioned anywhere on the roof surface. To take into account the worst case
scenario, this load is placed at the ridge position of the building.
When there is no snowload to consider, a minimal maintenance load of 20kg/m^2 is applied over the full
roofsurface.

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 25/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

3. Load combinations
Partial safety method

permanent action G, G.add dead load


variable actions: Q imposed load
S snow
W wind
Sa accidental snow
Wa accidental wind (open doors)
E Seisme
factors  ψ.0 combination value for variable action
ψ.1 frequent value for variable action
ψ.2 quasi permantent value for variable action
E
N
1
9
9
0
:
a
n
n
e
x
A
t
a
b
l
e
A
1
.
1
(
A
)
&
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
3
§
4
.
2
(
1
)
&
E
N
1
9
9
8
_
1
§
3
.
2
.
4
,
§
4
.
2
.
4
imposed load categorie B (office) ψ 0_QB  0.7 ψ 1_QB  0.5 ψ 2_QB  0.3

imposed load categorie E (storage) ψ 0_QE  1 ψ 1_QE  0.9 ψ 2_QE  0.8

imposed load categorie H (roofs) ψ 0_QH  1 ψ 1_QH  0 ψ 2_QH  0


E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
1
§
3
.
3
.
2
(
1
)
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
l
o
a
d
o
n
r
o
o
f
n
o
t
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
s
n
o
w
o
r
w
i
n
d
snow (for Alt <1000m ) ψ 0S  0.5 ψ 1S  0.2 ψ 2S  0

wind ψ 0W  0.6 ψ 1W  0.2

snow + seisme ψ E_S  ψ 2S


Et
Nh
1
9d
9e
8
_
1g
§n
3
.
2
.
4m
p
s
ia
Ec
c
oo
mn
b
i
n.
a
t
i
of
na
c
oo
e
f
f
i
c
i
er
n
to
i
nf
ds
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
e
s
i
s
e
i
s
i
c
t
i
§
4
2
.
4
c
t
r
1
f
o
r
o
E
N
1
9
9
0
:
a
n
n
e
x
A
t
a
b
l
e
A
1
.
2
(
A
)
g
r
o
u
p
B
S
T
R
/
G
E
O

factors 

Favourable γG.inf  1

Unfavourable γG.sup  1.35

Unfavourable γQ.sup_S  1.5


γQ.sup  1.5
γQ.sup_W  1.5
γSLS.E  0

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 26/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

E
N
1
9
9
0
§
6
.
5
Service Limit State SLS:

Characteristic combinations
1.0  (G+Gadd)  1.0  S
1.0  (G+Gadd)  1.0  W
1.0  (G+Gadd)  1.0  Q
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 0S  S  ψ 0W  W  1  Q Q dominant

1.0  (G+Gadd)  1  S  ψ 0W  W  ψ 0Q  Q S dominant


1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 0S  S  1  W  ψ 0Q  Q V dominant
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 2S  S  γSLS.E  E  ψ 2Q  Q Seisme

Frequent combinations
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 1S  S
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 1W  W
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 1Q  Q
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 2S  S  ψ 2W  W  ψ 1Q  Q Q dominant

1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 1S  S  ψ 2W  W  ψ 2Q  Q S dominant


1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 2S  S  ψ 1W  W  ψ 2Q  Q V dominant
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 2S  S  γSLS.E  E  ψ 2Q  Q Seisme
Sc
L
Si
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
E
N
1
9
9
3
-
1
-
1
§
7
.
2
.
1
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
o
r
E
N
1
9
9
0
§
6
.
5
.
2
(
1
)
a
n
d
a
n
n
e
x
A
1
.
4
f
o
r
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
r
t
e
r
i
a

Deflection limits

recommanded values roof beam, only accessible for maintenance


total deflection defl1  "L/200"

deflection due to variable loads defl2  "L/250"

Displacement limits

recommanded values

column industrial building, no brittle walls nor overhead crane disp1  "H/150"

column industrial building, with brittle walls disp2  "Hi/300"

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 27/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Ultimate limite state: ULS statical equilibrum for structural element resistance
ES
NT
1
9
9i
0n
§
6
.
4
.
3
.
2a
f
uu
nr
de
ao
mt
eh
ne
t
a
lt
cu
oc
mt
b
i
n,
a
t
i
ov
ne
s
,n
T
ad
b
l
ey
A
1
.
2n
(
Bt
&o
C
)d
R
:
t
e
r
n
a
l
f
i
l

s
r
u
r
e
g
o
r
e
b
s
t
r
e
g
h
r
e
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
γG.sup  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup  Q (eq. 6.10 or eq 6.10b without reduction [ξ=1[)

 
γG.sup  G+Gadd  γQ.sup_S  S

γG.sup  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup_W  W


favourable permanent load with
γG.inf  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup_W  W uplift wind component

γG.sup  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup_S  ψ 0S  S  γQ.sup_W  ψ 0W  W  γQ.sup  Q

γG.sup  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup_S  S  γQ.sup_W  ψ 0V  W  γQ.sup  ψ 0Q  Q

γG.sup  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup_S  ψ 0S  S  γQ.sup_W  W  γQ.sup  ψ 0Q  Q

γG.inf  (G+Gadd)  γQ.sup_S  ψ 0S  S  γQ.sup_W  W


E
N
1
9
9
0
§
6
.
4
.
3
.
3
A
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
ψ
v
a
l
u
e
s
i
n
a
n
n
e
x
1

1.0  (G+Gadd)  Sa  ψ 1W  W (eq 6.11, conservative general application


of ψ.1,i)
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 1S  S  Wa
E
N
1
9
9
0
§
6
.
4
.
3
.
4
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
d
e
s
i
g
n

(eq 6.12)
1.0  (G+Gadd)  ψ 2S  S  ψ 2W  W  E

Partial factors for materials (strength and resistance) EN1990 § 6.5.4 refers to relevant material code
EN1993-1-3 for cold formed steel

cross-section verification γM0  1

stability checks γM1  1

material fracture (tension)


γM2  1.25 cold formed steel code EN1993-1-3 §2.(3)

partial factor for mechanical fasteners & connections γM2  1.25 EN1993-1-3 §8.3(5)
6
.
1
0c
a
nm
dp
6
.
1
4i
bn
-a
ic
t
i
si
nn
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
f
o
r
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
o
n
e
a
c
o
a
n
y
g
t
o

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 28/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

4. Loads on frame In the 2D frame calculation loads are introduced as line loads on the frames
Frame distance A  5m
αhyp_faç  1.1 αhyp_roof  1.1

4.1. Permanent loads on frame


1 1
A  αhyp_faç  gtot_faç  0.479  kN  m A  αhyp_faç  gadd_faç  0  kN  m

1 1
A  αhyp_roof  gtot_roof  0.518  kN  m A  αhyp_roof  gadd_roof  0  kN  m

(The dead load is integrated in the software.)


4.2. Imposed load
1 1
A  αhyp_roof  qk  1.1  kN  m A  αhyp_roof  qk  cos ( α)  1.083  kN  m

This load can be omitted if the snowload has a bigger value

4.3. Snow loads on frame (Load in StrEngS is per meter roofbeam)


1 1
A  αhyp_roof  stot  μ1 ( α)  0  kN  m A  αhyp_roof  stot  μ1 ( α)  cos ( α)  0  kN  m

1 1
A  αhyp_roof  stot  μ2 ( α)  0  kN  m A  αhyp_roof  stot  μ2 ( α)  cos ( α)  0  kN  m

4.4. Wind loads on frame


general windload for closed building (duo- or monopitch)
lateral wind : kN
Wall in wind: sw1  αhyp_faç A  qpZ_f  cp10D_L ( sw1)  2.31 
m
kN
Wall out of wind: sw2  αhyp_faç A  qpZ_f  cp10E_L ( sw2)  1.39 
m

Roof in wind: sr1neg_G  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10G_neg_L 1


( sr1neg_G)  3.56  kN  m
windward side
mono & duo sr1pos_G  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10G_pos_L 1
( sr1pos_G)  0.36  kN  m
pitch
sr1neg_H  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10H_neg_L 1
( sr1neg_H)  1.6  kN  m

sr1pos_H  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10H_pos_L


1
( sr1pos_H)  0.36  kN  m

Roof out of wind: sr2neg_J  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10J_neg_L


1
( sr2neg_J)  2.85  kN  m
Leeward side
duopitch sr2pos_J  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10J_pos_L
1
( sr2pos_J )  0.36  kN  m
sr2neg_I  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10I_neg_L
1
( sr2neg_I)  1.78  kN  m
sr2pos_I  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10I_pos_L
1
( sr2pos_I)  0  kN  m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 29/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Right side wind Leeward side monopitch

sr2neg_H_180  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10H_neg_L_180 1


sr2neg_H_180  1.6  kN  m

sr2pos_H_180  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10H_pos_L_180 1


sr2pos_H_180  0.36  kN  m

sr2neg_G_180  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10G_neg_L_180 1


sr2neg_G_180  3.56  kN  m

sr2pos_G_180  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10G_pos_L_180 1


sr2pos_G_180  0.36  kN  m

sr2neg_J=-2.85.kN/m
sr1neg_H=-1.6.kN/m
sr2pos_J=0.36.kN/m
sr1neg_G=-3.56.kN/m sr2neg_I=-1.78.kN/m
sr1pos_H=0.36.kN/m
sr2pos_I=0.kN/m
sr1pos_G=0.36.kN/m

sw2=-1.39.kN/m

sw1=2.31.kN/m
Tc
ao
bm
e
lb
7
.
4a
ai
No
En
N!
E
N
1
9
9
1
-
1
-
3
/
N
A
:
2
0
0
7
:
4
l
o
a
d
c
a
s
e
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
:
a
l
l
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
/
a
l
l
s
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
s

Extend (in horizontal plan) zones in roof:

1
e10_L  eL  1.466 m 1
10 e2_L  eL  7.33 m
2
general windload for closed building (duo- or monopitch)

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 30/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

FRONT WIND:

1
Side walls: fw  αhyp_faç  A  qpZ_f  cp10B_F fw  2.77  kN  m

1
Roof: fr  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ_r  cp10H_neg_F fr  2.32  kN  m

image_frame_frontwind
INTERNAL WIND:

qpZ  qpZ_r qpZ  0.648 kN m  2


Overpressure: ipos_Lr  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ  cpi_pos_L 1
ipos_Lr  0.713  kN  m
ipos_Lw  αhyp_faç  A  qpZ  cpi_pos_L 1
ipos_Lw  0.713  kN  m
ipos_Fr  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ  cpi_pos_F 1
ipos_Fr  0.713  kN  m
ipos_Fw  αhyp_faç  A  qpZ  cpi_pos_F 1
ipos_Fw  0.713  kN  m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 31/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

1
Underpressure: ineg_Lr  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ  cpi_neg_L ineg_Lr  1.069  kN  m
1
ineg_Lw  αhyp_faç  A  qpZ  cpi_neg_L ineg_Lw  1.069  kN  m
1
ineg_Fr  αhyp_roof  A  qpZ  cpi_neg_F ineg_Fr  1.069  kN  m
1
ineg_Fw  αhyp_faç  A  qpZ  cpi_neg_F ineg_Fw  1.069  kN  m

cpi_NEG
Ratio internal under/overpressure: ξintern  ξintern  1.5
cpi_POS

Internal wid in accidental situation:

Side wind

ipos_acc_L  A  qpZ cpi_pos_acc_L ( ipos_acc_L)  0  kN  m


1

ineg_acc_L  A  qpZ cpi_neg_acc_L ( ineg_acc_L)  0  kN  m


1

Frontwind:

ipos_acc_F  A  qpZ cpi_pos_acc_F ( ipos_acc_F)  0  kN  m


1

ineg_acc_F  A  qpZ cpi_neg_acc_F ( ineg_acc_F)  0  kN  m


1

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 32/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

windload on open building

4.5. Seismic loads on frame


Shear force at the base of the structure :
GSeismic  Gtotal  ψ 2S  Stotal  46.185  kN

Sd2 ( Tt1)
Fb  GSeismic   λ  5.542  kN
g

axial load on windbraces  Fb 


 F1Axis   2.771  kN
 2 
Distribution on frame level (assume mass concentrated at ridge and gutters with an equal
distribution)
1 1 
No    HR   HG if BS = "Monopitch"
2 2 
1 2 
  HR   HG otherwise
3 3 

seismic force ridge level: seismic force gutter level:

F b  HR 1 F b  HG 1
Fr   if BS = "Monopitch" Fg   if BS = "Monopitch"
No 2 No 2
1 1
otherwise otherwise
3 3

Fr  1.978 kN Fg  1.782 kN


Fr Fg
Fr_fr   0.738  kN Fg_fr   0.665  kN
each frame
 nFrames   nFrames 
schematic graphic representation:

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 33/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Fr_fr  0.738  kN
Fg_fr  0.665  kN
Fg_fr  0.665  kN

image_frame_seisme

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 34/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Gable end columns

5. Gable end columns


5.1. Geometric specifications of
gable end columns

Distance between gable end columns - from left to right - exterior view of building:
starting from the outside of the frame column (sheeting thickness is automatically taken into account)

W l ddi  0 185 m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 35/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Wcladding  0.185 m

sideIV_gables  "4.11/4.11" sideII_gables  "4.11/4.11"

B_IV  splitgab ( sideIV_gables) B_II  splitgab ( sideII_gables)

checkWidth  "OK"

In the following tables, these abreviations mean:


B_IV: intermediate distance bewteen gable end columns in side IV (front) gable end
H_IV: height of gable end columns in side IV (front) gable end
BL_IV: width of the part of the facade, bearing to the gable end column in question in the side IV (front)
gable end including cladding width
B_II: intermediate distance bewteen gable end columns in side II (back) gable end
H_II: height of gable end columns in side II (back) gable end
BL_II: width of the part of the facade, bearing to the gable end column in question in the side II (back)
gable end including cladding width
Summary for the side IV (front) gable end:

4.11 
B_IV   m H_IV  (7.73 ) m BL_IV  (8.59 ) m
4.11 

Summary for the side II (back) gable end:

4.11 
B_II   m H_II  (7.73 ) m BL_II  (8.59 ) m
4.11 

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 36/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

5.2. Wind load on gable columns


Summarization of wind actions on the gable ends (see also 2.3.1.):

For lateral wind: suction: cp10B_L  0.8


For frontal wind: suction: cp10E_F  0.318
pressure: cp10D_F  0.626
Max pressure on gable end columns (inwards):


qW_pos  qpZ_r  cp10D_F  cpi_neg_F  qW_pos  0.6  kN  m
2

Max suction on gable end columns (outwards):

sucmax  mincp10B_L  cp10E_F sucmax  0.8


qW_neg  qpZ_r   sucmax  cpi_pos_F
2
qW_neg  0.648  kN  m

Wind load taken into account for support reactions on column bases:


qW_MAX  max qW_pos  qW_neg  qW_MAX  0.65  kN  m
2

Max pressure on gable end columns (inwards) (accidental):


qW_pos_acc  qpZ_r  cp10D_F  cpi_neg_acc_F  qW_pos_acc  0.406  kN  m
2

Max suction on gable end columns (outwards) (accidental):

sucmax2  mincp10B_L  cpi_pos_acc_L  cp10E_F  cpi_pos_acc_F



qW_neg_acc  qpZ_r  sucmax2  qW_neg_acc  0.518  kN  m
2

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 37/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Summary of loads on gable end columns for side IV (front) gable end:
In the following tables, these abreviations mean:
qWBL_IV_pos: wind load (pressure) taken into account for the gable end column in question
qWBL_IV_neg: wind load (suction) taken into account for the gable end column in question
R_IV_max: maximal support reaction on column bases - side IV (front) gable end (without influence of
parapet)
RG_IV_max: maximal support reaction gravity on column bases - side IV (front) gable end

kN
qWBL_IV_pos  (5.16 )  kN R_IV_MAX  (21.52 )  kN
m qWBL_IV_neg  (5.57 ) 
m

Summary of loads on gable end columns for side II (back) gable end:
In the following tables, these abreviations mean:
qWBL_II_pos: wind load (pressure) taken into account for the gable end column in question
qWBL_II_neg: wind load (suction) taken into account for the gable end column in question
R_II_max: maximal support reaction on column bases - side II (back) gable end (without influence of
parapet)
RG_II_max: maximal support reaction gravity on column bases - side II (back) gable end

kN kN
qWBL_II_pos  (5.16 )  qWBL_II_neg  (5.57 )  R_II_MAX  (21.52 )  kN
m m

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 38/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

Gable end columns

Wind braces

6. Wind braces
6.1. Overview of wind actions on gable end surfaces
Peak velocity pressure (SLS): qpZ  0.648 kN m  2
6.1.1. External wind actions on gable ends

For side wind: suction: cp10B_L  0.8


For front wind: suction: cp10E_F  0.318
pressure: cp10D_F  0.626
6.1.2. Internal wind actions on gable ends

suction: cpi_NEG  0.3


pressure: cpi_POS  0.2
6.1.3. Wind actions on parapets

Parapet in the wind: cp_net_iw_f  1.5

Parapet leeward from the cp_net_dw_f  1


wind:

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 39/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

6.2. Gable end surface to consider for the wind braces


GABLE END SURFACE TO BE TAKEN IN TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FORCE ACTING ON THE WIND BRACES.

SYTEM AND NUMBER OF WIND BRACES IN THE WALLS:

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 40/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

k0
6.2.1. Gable end surface acting on longitudinal axis Type:1

Designation: Namek  "Axis A,B /03-04"

Wind bracing system: systemk  "B"

Number of wind braces: nk  1

Roof type: roof_type k  "A"

Side wall/intermediate nb  0
column: k

Dimensions: In case of coupled buildings:


B1  WOD B1  8.59 m B2  0m B2  0  m
k k k k
HG1  1.3m HG2  HG
k k
α1  α α1  10  deg α2  0deg α2  0  deg
k k k k
HR1  2.235m HR1  2.235 m B2
k k k
HR2  HG2   tan  α2 
k k 2  k
HR2  6.968  m
k
Parapet height (if appropriate):
hp
Presence of parapet in the gable ends: Acro k 
m
HAcro  max  HR1  HR2  HAcro  6.968 m
k  k k k

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 41/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

6.3. Forces to be taken by the wind braces


6.3.1. Gable end surface to be taken into account

B1 HG1 B2 HG2
k k k k
S1    nb  
k 2 2 k 2 2
 B1 HR1  HG1 B2 HR2  HG2 
 k k k k k k 1
S2     nb    if roof_typek = "A"
k  2 2 k 2 2  2
1
if roof_typek = "B"
3

2
if roof_typek = "C"
3

 B1 B2 
 k k 
SAcro_1  Acro k     HAcro  HR1   nb    HAcro  HR2 
k  2  k k k 2  k k

SAcro_2  Acro k  S2
k k

 "Name" "S_Gable = S1+S2 [m²]" "S_acro = S_Acro_1 + S_Acro_2 [m²]" 


surface   
"Axis A,B /03-04" 3.796 0 

6.3.2. Friction forces

Total width of the building: WODtot  8.59 m

Total length of the building: L OD  14.66 m


Non affected distance in longitudinal direction (L.fr_n_e): L fr_n_e  17.18 m
Affected length in longitudinal direction (L_fr): L fr  0 m
Reference area:
L fr  HG1
k
Sfr_faç   1  nb  
k  k 2
 2 2 
 B1   B2 
  k 2  k 2
Sfr_roof  L fr 
  2   HR1k  HG1k  nbk  2   HR2k  HG1k 
k         
Friction force:
FFr  cfr   qpZ_f  Sfr_faç  qpZ_r  Sfr_roof 
k  k k

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 42/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

6.3.3. Front wind

System A - gable end in the wind:

k k
 
Fw1_a  qpZ  SGable  cp10D_F  cpi_NEG  SAcro  cp_net_iw_f
 k 
System A - gable end leeward of the wind:

k k
 
Fw1_b  qpZ  SGable  cp10E_F  cpi_POS  SAcro  cp_net_dw_f  FFr
 k  k

System B - both gable ends:

k  k
  k

Fw1_c  qpZ  SGable  cp10D_F  cp10E_F  SAcro  cp_net_iw_f  cp_net_dw_f   FFr  k

Fw1  max  Fw1_a  Fw1_b  if systemk = "A"


k  k k

Fw1_c if systemk = "B"


k

6.3.4. Side wind


System A:

k  k

Fw2_a  qpZ  SGable  cp10B_L  cpi_POS  
System B:
Fw2_b  0kN
k

Fw2  Fw2_a if systemk = "A"


k k

Fw2_b if systemk = "B"


k

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 43/65


Frisomat NV | Engineering Department
Stokerijstraat 79, 2110 Wijnegem | BELGIUM
+32 3 353 33 99 | info@frisomat.com

6.4. Additional reaction forces


HCross  HG1  0.2m if roof_typek = "A"
k k

HG1  0.2m if roof_typek = "B"


k

HR1  0.2m if roof_type k = "C"


k

6.4.1. Front wind


1
Horizontal reaction force at the column base (SLS): H_ELSk  Fw1 
(Characteristic value) k nk

HCross
k
Vertical reaction force at the column base (SLS): V_ELSk  Fw1 
(Characteristic value) k nk  A
Horizontal reaction force at the column base (ULS): H_ELUk  γQ.sup_W  H_ELSk
(Design value)
Vertical reaction force at the column base (ULS): V_ELUk  γQ.sup_W  V_ELSk
(Design value)
Reaction forces [kN], to be combined with the results from the frame calculations in
load combinations with front wind:

 "" "H_SLS (kN)" "V_SLS (kN)" "H_ULS (kN)" "V_ULS (kN)" 


result   
"Axis A,B /03-04" 2.322 0.511 3.483 0.766 

6.4.2. Side wind


1
Horizontal reaction force at the column base (SLS): H_ELSk  Fw2 
(Characteristic value) k nk

HCross
k
Vertical reaction force at the column base (SLS): V_ELSk  Fw2 
(Characteristic value) k nk  A
Horizontal reaction force at the column base (ULS): H_ELUk  γQ.sup_W  H_ELSk
(Design value)
Vertical reaction force at the column base (ULS): V_ELUk  γQ.sup_W  V_ELSk
(Design value)
Reaction forces [kN], to be combined with the results from the frame calculations in
load combinations with side wind:

 "" "H_SLS (kN)" "V_SLS (kN)" "H_ULS (kN)" "V_ULS (kN)" 


result   
"Axis A,B /03-04" 0 0 0 0 

Wind braces

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 44/65


7. Résultats du logiciel StrEngS

Projet
N° de projet ax2200285
Client Denys Comilog
Site de construction Moanda, Gabon
Date 14.04.2022
Version de StrEngS StrEngS 22.02 (#65)
Données de l'ossature
Type d'hangar Frisohall Astrigma
Forme Duopitch roof
Largeur 8.220 m
Hauteur 1.300m (6.800 m)
Longueur 14.400 m
Entredistance des ossatures 5.000 m
Fondation Hinge
Pente de toiture 10.00 deg
Données des charges
Code des charges France
Revêtement de façade Wall girts + TR45 (0.08 kN/m2)
Revêtement de toiture Roof purlins + TR45 (0.08 kN/m2)
Charge d'entretien 0.20 kN/m2
Altitude 0.000 m
Vent 22.000 m/s (Zone de vent: 1; Exposition au vent: II)
Charge sismique 0.040 g; Classe de sol: B (T1 = 0.392 s)
Paramètres de projet
H/Delta_max 100
L/Delta_max 250
Gamma_M0 1.000
Gamma_M1 1.000

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 45/65


7.1.  Vue générale

7.2.  Nœuds

Nr. X, m Y, m Z, m
1 0.000 -3.950 5.500
2 0.000 -3.950 6.666
3 0.000 0.000 7.362
4 0.000 3.950 6.666
5 0.000 3.950 5.500
6 0.000 -3.950 5.655
7 0.000 3.950 5.655
8 0.000 -2.983 6.836
9 0.000 2.983 6.836
10 0.000 -1.483 7.101
11 0.000 1.483 7.101
12 0.000 -0.069 7.350
13 0.000 0.069 7.350
14 0.000 -3.605 6.727
15 0.000 3.605 6.727
16 0.000 -3.950 6.315
17 0.000 3.950 6.315
18 0.000 -0.258 7.317
19 0.000 0.258 7.317

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 46/65


7.3.  Appuis

Nom Nœud Déplacement Rotation


X Y Z X Y Z
Fl 1 Fixe Fixe Fixe Fixe
Fr 5 Fixe Fixe Fixe Fixe
cl1 6 Fixe
cln 2 Fixe Fixe Fixe
cr1 7 Fixe
crn 4 Fixe Fixe Fixe
bl1 8 Fixe
br1 9 Fixe
bl2 10 Fixe
br2 11 Fixe
blr 12 Fixe
brr 13 Fixe
bn 3 Fixe Fixe Fixe
bl0 14 Fixe Fixe Fixe
br0 15 Fixe Fixe Fixe
cl0 16 Fixe Fixe Fixe
cr0 17 Fixe Fixe Fixe

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 47/65


7.4.  Charges sur éléments
Cas de charge: G

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl Z -0.45
Cl0 Z -0.45
Cr Z -0.45
Cr0 Z -0.45
Bl0 Z -0.42
Bl1 Z -0.42
Bln Z -0.42
Br0 Z -0.42
Br1 Z -0.42
Brn Z -0.42

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 48/65


Cas de charge: Q

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Bl0 Z -0.98
Bl1 Z -0.98
Bln Z -0.98
Br0 Z -0.98
Br1 Z -0.98
Brn Z -0.98

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 49/65


Cas de charge: Wl1

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z -2.11
Cl0 z -2.11
Cr z -1.27
Cr0 z -1.27
Bl0 z 3.24
Bl1 z [1.46; 3.24]
Bln z 1.46
Br0 z 1.62
Br1 z [1.62; 2.59]
Brn z 2.59

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 50/65


Cas de charge: Wl2

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z -2.11
Cl0 z -2.11
Cr z -1.27
Cr0 z -1.27
Bl0 z -0.32
Bl1 z -0.32
Bln z -0.32
Br1 z [-0.32; 0.00]
Brn z -0.32

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 51/65


Cas de charge: Wl3

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z -2.11
Cl0 z -2.11
Cr z -1.27
Cr0 z -1.27
Bl0 z -0.32
Bl1 z -0.32
Bln z -0.32
Br0 z 1.62
Br1 z [1.62; 2.59]
Brn z 2.59

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 52/65


Cas de charge: Wl4

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z -2.11
Cl0 z -2.11
Cr z -1.27
Cr0 z -1.27
Bl0 z 3.24
Bl1 z [1.46; 3.24]
Bln z 1.46
Br1 z [-0.32; 0.00]
Brn z -0.32

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 53/65


Cas de charge: Wf

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z 2.52
Cl0 z 2.52
Cr z -2.52
Cr0 z -2.52
Bl0 z 2.11
Bl1 z 2.11
Bln z 2.11
Br0 z 2.11
Br1 z 2.11
Brn z 2.11

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 54/65


Cas de charge: Wol

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z 0.65
Cl0 z 0.65
Cr z -0.65
Cr0 z -0.65
Bl0 z 0.65
Bl1 z 0.65
Bln z 0.65
Br0 z 0.65
Br1 z 0.65
Brn z 0.65

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 55/65


Cas de charge: Wul

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z -0.97
Cl0 z -0.97
Cr z 0.97
Cr0 z 0.97
Bl0 z -0.97
Bl1 z -0.97
Bln z -0.97
Br0 z -0.97
Br1 z -0.97
Brn z -0.97

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 56/65


Cas de charge: Wof

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z 0.65
Cl0 z 0.65
Cr z -0.65
Cr0 z -0.65
Bl0 z 0.65
Bl1 z 0.65
Bln z 0.65
Br0 z 0.65
Br1 z 0.65
Brn z 0.65

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 57/65


Cas de charge: Wuf

Composant Direction Valeur, kN/m


Cl z -0.97
Cl0 z -0.97
Cr z 0.97
Cr0 z 0.97
Bl0 z -0.97
Bl1 z -0.97
Bln z -0.97
Br0 z -0.97
Br1 z -0.97
Brn z -0.97

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 58/65


7.5.  Charges locales
Cas de charge: E

Nœud Fx, kN Fy, kN Fz, kN


2 0.00 0.61 0.00
3 0.00 0.67 0.00
4 0.00 0.61 0.00

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 59/65


7.6.  Cas de charges
Nom Déscription
G Poids propre
Q Charge d'entretien
Wl1 Vent latéral sur façade gauche, variant 1
Wl2 Vent latéral sur façade gauche, variant 2
Wl3 Vent latéral sur façade gauche, variant 3
Wl4 Vent latéral sur façade gauche, variant 4
Wf Vent frontal
Wol Surpression, due au vent de gauche
Wul Souspression, due au vent de gauche
Wof Surpression, due au vent frontal
Wuf Souspression, due au vent frontal
E Charge sismique

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 60/65


7.7.  Combinaisons de charges
Nom Type Cas de charge
G Q Wl1 Wl2 Wl3 Wl4 Wf Wol Wul Wof Wuf E
[G+Q]k ELS 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl1+Wol]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl1+Wul]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl2+Wol]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl2+Wul]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl3+Wol]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl3+Wul]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl4+Wol]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wl4+Wul]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wf+Wof]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[G+Wf+Wuf]k ELS 1.000 1.000 1.000
[1.35·G+1.5·Q]d ELU 1.350 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl1+1.5·Wol]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl1+1.5·Wul]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl2+1.5·Wol]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl2+1.5·Wul]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl3+1.5·Wol]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl3+1.5·Wul]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl4+1.5·Wol]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wl4+1.5·Wul]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wf+1.5·Wof]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500
[G+1.5·Wf+1.5·Wuf]d ELU 1.000 1.500 1.500

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 61/65


7.8.  Forces de réaction
Cas/combinaison de charge Rx, kN Ry, kN Rz, kN Mx, kN.m My, kN.m Mz, kN.m
Appui: Fl (Nœud: 1)
G 0.0000 1.8519 2.7932 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Q 0.0000 3.4777 3.9500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl1 0.0000 -8.7582 -8.7604 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl2 0.0000 -1.4899 0.8356 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl3 0.0000 -6.1792 -1.8198 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl4 0.0000 -4.0689 -6.1050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wf 0.0000 -5.4053 -8.3186 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wol 0.0000 -1.7539 -2.5596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wul 0.0000 2.6308 3.8394 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wof 0.0000 -1.7539 -2.5596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wuf 0.0000 2.6308 3.8394 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
E 0.0000 -0.9403 -0.3366 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[1.35·G+1.5·Q]d 0.0000 7.7166 9.6959 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl1+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 -13.9164 -14.1868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl1+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 -7.3394 -4.5884 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl2+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 -3.0139 0.2071 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl2+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 3.5631 9.8055 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl3+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 -10.0479 -3.7760 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl3+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 -3.4709 5.8224 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl4+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 -6.8824 -10.2037 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl4+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 -0.3054 -0.6053 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wf+1.5·Wof]d 0.0000 -8.8870 -13.5242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wf+1.5·Wuf]d 0.0000 -2.3100 -3.9258 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Appui: Fr (Nœud: 5)
G 0.0000 -1.8519 2.7932 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Q 0.0000 -3.4777 3.9500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl1 0.0000 4.8282 -6.9249 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl2 0.0000 -2.5954 0.9137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl3 0.0000 0.6344 -4.7078 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wl4 0.0000 1.5983 -1.3034 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wf 0.0000 5.4053 -8.3186 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wol 0.0000 1.7539 -2.5596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wul 0.0000 -2.6308 3.8394 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wof 0.0000 1.7539 -2.5596 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Wuf 0.0000 -2.6308 3.8394 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
E 0.0000 -0.9403 0.3366 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[1.35·G+1.5·Q]d 0.0000 -7.7166 9.6959 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl1+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 8.0213 -11.4336 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl1+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 1.4443 -1.8351 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl2+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 -3.1141 0.3242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl2+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 -9.6911 9.9227 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl3+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 1.7307 -8.1079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl3+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 -4.8463 1.4905 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl4+1.5·Wol]d 0.0000 3.1765 -3.0014 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wl4+1.5·Wul]d 0.0000 -3.4005 6.5970 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wf+1.5·Wof]d 0.0000 8.8870 -13.5242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
[G+1.5·Wf+1.5·Wuf]d 0.0000 2.3100 -3.9258 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 62/65


Annexe informative A: Résumé des forces de réactions sur fondation 'Type A'

Ce résumé prend en compte les actions des ossatures (chapitre ‘Résultats du logiciel StrEngS – Forces de réaction’) et des croix de st. André (chapitre
‘Influence sur les montants des croix de St. André’) dans toutes les fondations du type donné. Les mêmes facteurs de sécurité des calculs d’ossature (ELU ‘STR
– set B’ conforma à EN 1990) sont appliqués. Cela ne donne qu'une estimation des actions pour la conception des fondations et géotechnique car autres
facteurs de sécurités peut être applicable.

Résumé des forces maximale (en Etat Limite Ultime)
Rx, kN Ry, kN Rz, kN Mx, kN.m My, kN.m Mz, kN.m
Max Ry (*) [G+1.5∙Wl1+1.5∙Wol]d 0 13.9164 ‐14.1868 0 0 0
Max Rz (Gravité) [G+1.5∙Wl2+1.5∙Wul]d 0 9.6911 9.9227 0 0 0
Min Rz (Soulèvement) [G+1.5∙Wl1+1.5∙Wol]d 0 13.9164 ‐14.1868 0 0 0
( )
* Cette force peut se produire en chaque direction

Remarque: Ce tableau donne une indication des actions conservatives en raison de l’abstraction des conventions de 
signe.

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 63/65


Annexe informative B: Résumé des forces de réactions sur fondation 'Type B'

Ce résumé prend en compte les actions des ossatures (chapitre ‘Résultats du logiciel StrEngS – Forces de réaction’) et des croix de st. André (chapitre
‘Influence sur les montants des croix de St. André’) dans toutes les fondations du type donné. Les mêmes facteurs de sécurité des calculs d’ossature (ELU ‘STR
– set B’ conforma à EN 1990) sont appliqués. Cela ne donne qu'une estimation des actions pour la conception des fondations et géotechnique car autres
facteurs de sécurités peut être applicable.

Résumé des forces maximale (en Etat Limite Ultime)
Rx, kN Ry, kN Rz, kN Mx, kN.m My, kN.m Mz, kN.m

Max Rx (*) [G+1.5∙Wf+1.5∙Wof]d (avec influences des croix st. André) 3.48 8.887 ‐14.2892 0 0 0

Max Ry (*) [G+1.5∙Wl1+1.5∙Wol]d (avec influences des croix st. André) 0 13.9164 ‐14.1868 0 0 0

Max Rz (Gravité) [G+1.5∙Wl2+1.5∙Wul]d (avec influences des croix st. André) 0 9.6911 9.9227 0 0 0

Min Rz (Soulèvement) [G+1.5∙Wf+1.5∙Wof]d (avec influences des croix st. André) 3.48 8.887 ‐14.2892 0 0 0


( )
* Cette force peut se produire en chaque direction

Remarque: Ce tableau donne une indication des actions conservatives en raison de l’abstraction des conventions de 
signe.

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 64/65


Annexe informative C: Résumé des forces de réactions sur fondation 'Type C'

Ce résumé prend en compte les actions des ossatures (chapitre ‘Résultats du logiciel StrEngS – Forces de réaction’) et des croix de st. André (chapitre
‘Influence sur les montants des croix de St. André’) dans toutes les fondations du type donné. Les mêmes facteurs de sécurité des calculs d’ossature (ELU ‘STR
– set B’ conforma à EN 1990) sont appliqués. Cela ne donne qu'une estimation des actions pour la conception des fondations et géotechnique car autres
facteurs de sécurités peut être applicable.

Résumé des forces maximale (en Etat Limite Ultime)
Rx, kN Ry, kN Rz, kN Mx, kN.m My, kN.m Mz, kN.m
Max Ry (*) [G+1.5∙Wl1+1.5∙Wol]d 0 4.61 1.38 0 0 0
Max Rz (Gravité) [G+1.5∙Wl1+1.5∙Wol]d 0 4.61 1.38 0 0 0
( )
* Cette force peut se produire en chaque direction

Remarque: Ce tableau donne une indication des actions conservatives en raison de l’abstraction des conventions de 
signe.

14/04/2022 ax2200285 Denys Comilog - HMI - Descente de charges_v1 65/65

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi