Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Investigation Into The Effects of Music and Meditation On Galvanic Skin Response
Investigation Into The Effects of Music and Meditation On Galvanic Skin Response
Summary
Music and meditation are nowadays commonly used as relaxation techniques. Meditation is known to
have an effect on the mental state of practitioners. It is considered to have stress-reducing capabilities.
Similarly, music is believed to make a disturbed mind calm and relieved. It is used as a therapeutic agent
in some countries. In this work, the authors use music and meditation as stimuli in psychophysiological
experiments using galvanic skin response (GSR) as an objective method to estimate the emotional
response of subjects. Results show that GSR can be used as a measure of subjective mental states
during music appreciation. The effect of music on GSR is compared with that of meditation. A time-
series model is developed for the response. 0 2000 Editions scientifiques et m6dicales Elsevier SAS
autonomic nervous system I galvanic skin response I impedance measurement I psychophysics I psy
chophysiology
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Effect of music
RESULTS
Effect of music Figure 3. Distribution graph of the response obtained for music.
-10.00
-20.00
I
00.00 Time (second)
40.00
G 16.00
E0P 80.~ MU&nub
hsInkml8m I 10.00
5
f?? 0.00
CJ
G s.uu
-20.04
P0
a\0 0.50
-4Oy ,........I......... ,.....,.I i%
100.00 2ooho aa 0 0
Time (second) -5.00
remains at this steady-state level during 1000 seconds. Figure 6. GSR in response to music stimulus. Time-series used for
modeling.
After this the subject was disturbed from meditation to
see the effect on the response. From the graph it is clear
that the response decreases after 1000 seconds.
Data was collected from 50 subjects in this experiment. Figure 6 shows a typical time series obtained for music
The average response obtained was 17.5% (SD 6.35) of stimulus. The non-stationariness in the mean was remo-
GSR changes. ved by taking the first difference of the time series [ 111.
This series was made zero mean by subtracting the mean
MODELING from each sample.
The autocorrelation coefficients for different lags of the
From the experiments it was observed that the variation stationary time series are shown in figure 7. The coeffi-
in impedance follows the same pattern for the subjects in cient for lag one was the only significant one, suggesting
the selected group irrespective of the stimulus - music or the presence of an MA process of order one [ 11, 121. This
meditation. If a model can be developed for this variation was confirmed by calculating the partial autocorrelations
it can be used in predicting the GSR of a subject involved from Yule-Walker equations [l I]. Figure 8 shows the
in music or meditation. We have developed a univariate partial autocorrelation coefficients of the stationary time
time-series model for the varying part of the response. series.
162 N.N. Sudheesh, K.P. Joseph
------me-
-------c---------e---------
--------- ---------
Figure 7. Autocorrelation coefficients of stationary time series. Figure 9. Actual vs predicted response.
Q = n g r2(k) (6)
k=l
Figure 8. Partial autocorrelation coefficients of stationary time series. where m = maximum lag considered, II = N - d; N = Num-
ber of observations, d = order of differentiation in the model
and degrees of freedom calculated as m - p - q, p and q
being the orders of AR and MA processes, respectively.
Thus the model was identified as ARIMA (O,l,l). An This model describes the skin impedance variation. This
ARIMA (0, 1,l) model is represented as model was used in predicting the GSR of subjects involved
in music and meditation. Figure 9 shows the actual response
x(k) - x(k - 1) = p+ o(k) - 0, o(k - 1) (3) and the predicted response obtained from model (5). The
model was developed using the first 200 values of the time
where, o(k) = zero mean white noise sequence, 8! = moving series and predictions were made for the next 128 values.
average parameter of order 1, ~1= mean of the time series, Figure IO shows the model applied to the response of another
l.t was calculated as 0.026893. 8, was calculated from subject. From the graphs it can be observed that the model
satisfactorily predicts GSR. Response for meditation was
r(l)=-&(l +e^,Z) (4) also found to follow the same model.
Music, meditation and GSR 163