Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1976 Forced Convective Transition Boiling Review
1976 Forced Convective Transition Boiling Review
by
June 1976
FORCED CONVECTIVE TRANSITION BOILING
by
AECL-5543
Ebullition de transition dans des conditions convectives
forcées: revue de la l i t t é r a t u r e et comparaison
des méthodes da prédiction
par
Résumé
J'.iin 1976
AECL-5543
FORCED CONVECTIVE TRANSITION BOILING
by
ABSTRACT
that transition boiling data have been obtained only within a limited
range of conditions and many data are considered unreliable. The data do
Page
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION 1
MECHANISM OF TRANSITION BOILING 4
Pool Boiling 4
Forced Convective Boiling 7
8
PARAMETRIC EFFECTS
Effect of Mass Flux 8
(a) Subcooled or Low Quality Region 8
(b) High Quality Region 10
Effect of Quality 12
Effect of Pressure 14
Effect of Subcooling 14
Effect of Surface Condition 16
Effect of Transient 17
Empirical Correlations 39
(a) Ellion's Correlation 39
(b) Berenson's Correlation for Poo.l Boiling 39
(c) McDonough, Milich and King's Correlation 40
Comparison with'Data 40
(a) Ellion's IV. f a * 42
(b) Plumper's Data 42
(c) Peterson's Data 45
(d) Ramu's Data 45
(e) FLECHT Data ' 45
Discussion 48
REFERENCES 51
NOMENCLATURE 60
TABLES 63
INTRODUCTION
The. wire, after passing through the usual nucleate boiling region (BCD,
called boiling; crisis at the critical heat flux (D-F, figure 1 ) . A subse-
in heat flux caused a jump back to the nucleate boiling region (EC, figure 1 ) .
*Drew (1937) was the first one to observe the transition boiling curve.
CX.
LxJ
:c
LJJ CRITICAL HEAT FLUX
u_
M IN SURFACE TEMPERATURE
the critical heat flux at D and the minimum heat flux at E. The critical
heat flux has been extensively studied and can be predicted by a variety of
correlations. The minimum heat flux has undergone less study; it is known
where the flow can be either perpendicular to the heated surface (cross flow)
transient in pressure, flow and/or heat flux takes place during pool boiling
or flow boiling. The system used in the boiling study can be either heat
practice, during a fast transient, the thermal inertia of the system becomes
nuclear heated systems behave like a heat flux controlled system (except for
below th£ critical power*, situations can be postulated where the critical
is usually assumed that, when the critical heat flux is exceeded, the heat
transfer mode will change from the very efficient nucleate boiling mode
directly to the inefficient film boiling mode. This assumption ignores the
the thermal behaviour of a hot surface which is being rewetted (such as may
the transition boiling heat transfer mode. In both cases, the assumption that
film boiling rather than transition boiling occurs will result in an over-
report is to review the relevant transition boiling heat transfer literature "'
figure 2a for pool boiling, in figure 2b for subcooled or low quality flow
when the flow of vapour leaving the heated surface is so large that ii: pre-
vents a sufficient amount of liquid from reaching the surface to maintain the
heated surface in the wet condition. The phenomenon that limits the inflow
vapour and liquid becomes unstable. Zuber (1959) and Kutateladze (1966)
o
/V//7/////. /////.
(a) POOL BOILING (b) FLOW BOILING (SUBCOOLED OR LOW <c) FLOW BOILING (HIGH QUALITY)
QUALITY)
FIG. 2 SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF BOILING MODES
have derived equations for the CHF based on the Helmholtz instablity theory;
tlieir predictions agree with CHF values measured in pool boiling systems.
ture, the heated surface will be partially covered with unstable vapour
patches (varying with space and time). The formation of such dry patches
momentarily rewet the heated surface. Liquid contact with the heated surfac2
will be frequent at low wall superheats but become less frequent at high wall
superheats (Ruckenstein (1964)). Bankoff (1962) and Stock (1960) have shown
heated surface; the subsequent vapour thrust forced the liquid away trom the
liquid-solid contact near the minimum of the boiling curve. Hesse (1973) and
Stock (1960) believed th^t the vapour film (that may be in violent motion)
AT . .
'<iin
Two mechanisms for liquid-solid separation at high wall superheat
ave postulated:
case the pressure and the fluid properties govern the critical superheat level.
greater than the forces directing the liquid towards the heated surface) in
which case the vapour superheat depends on properties or the fluid and the
heated surface.
dynamically controlled while for low flows and low pressures, where suffi-
cient time is available and the volumetric expansion of the fluid near the
controlled.
reducing the vapour film thickness and changing the heat transfer mode from
In the high quality region (figure 2c) most of the heat transferred
significant fraction of the droplets will deposit on the heated surface but
at higher wall superheats the vapour repulsion forces vrould become signifi-
cant in repelling most of the droplets before they can contact the heated
the vapour. The heat transferred to the droplets was found to depend on
impact angle (McGinnis (1969)) and surface roughness (Wachters (1965)). These
variables also affect the minimum heat flux and corresponding surface temper-
ature.
PARAMETRIC EFFECTS
Note that $ was increased but that cj) . and AT . remained unchanged,
max mm inxn
An increase in hmT, was also reported by Pramuk (Jordan (1968)) who
ID
studied transition boiling in an agitated pool of water.
10 100
<p x 10 - 5 15
BTU
H -FT2
5 -.
8 10
U, FT/SEC
4
0 x 10 -5
BTU 3
H -FT T 2
5 10 15 20
U» FT/SEC
more efficient removal of bubbles thus delaying the DNB phenomenon. A higher
velocity also improves filn boiling heat transfer and, because of a corres-
liquid interaction in the rransition boiling region. From the above argu-
lower than at the lower flow. His results may be interpreted two ways:
qualities. It may well be that the velocity of the mixture is the important
Pv Pz J
Toda (1972) studied transition boiling of a disc cooked by a spray
analytical study Iloeje (1974) showed that at wall superheats typical of the
transition boiling region, the dominant heat flux is due to direct wall-
higher resulting in an increase in h_D and <j> . with mass flow. Plummer
la iuin
water flow. For the low flows studied (G <. 105lb/h.fc2), uT . increased
min
slightly with flow. The accuracy of the AT . value however is questionable*.
CD
o
en
cc O
CJ
CJ
or
o
z C3
—> UJ
o o
CD o
CJ
z m
o CO
X
=3 UJ
1
||
1—
CO CJ
CO UJ
z
o
u_ CJ
°a
t— LLJ
CJ CJ
UJ cc
U_ C3
CO
CD
12
heeit flux controlled system; he noticed that at high flows the usual excursion
but the slope of the boiling curve (d<f>/dT) above the C H F was reduced, This
(Bertoletti (1964)) is illustrated in figure 7. Note that the CHF is not greatly
disappears completely.
Effect of Quality
T T
W SAT
FIG, 7 EFFECT OF MASS FLUX ON BOILING CURVE
(ANNULAR FLOW REGIME)
T (
W S»T
FIG. 8 EFFECT OF QUALITY ON FORCED CONVECTIVE BOILING CURVE
14
Effect of Pressure
for Freon-114 at pressures between 3 and 20 bar. His results are shown in
figure 9: at low pressures the pressure effect was small but at high pres-
In general, for the same flow and quality, hp_ increases slightly
quently decreases with pressure. Near the critical pressure the boiling
curve changes to that characteristic of a single phase fluid as here the flow
has been evaluated theoretically by both Zuber (1961) and Kutateladze (1966).
The higher subcooling increases the CHF since for the same vapour flux leaving
L5
I i : i iiII | I I I IIII I I I I
10'
ATSAT(°C)
FIG 9 EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON POOL BOILING CURVES
OF FREON 114 (HESSE, 1973)
T
W~ T SAT
FIG 10 EFFECT OF SUBCOOLING ON BOiLING CURVE
16
the surface the heat flux must be higher. Also <J> . and h are higher
mm iB
because of reqvired higher surface heat flux to maintain the same vapour film
(from 100 seconds to 1 second). Also the spreading of the drypatch occurred
much more rapidly with a slight increase in subcooling. This agrees with
general, commercial surface finish did not affect <j> , tj> . or AT . but it
max mm mm
reduced AT (as compared to a mirror finish). Berenson'3 observations
max
agree with those of Nishikawa (1963), although Nishikawa observed an increase
and concluded that the surface roughness will increase h if the roughness
CD
height is larger than the laminar sublayer thickness. The effect on d> is
max
less clear: in the subcooled region the roughness effect is probably positive
(possible mechanism: the peak of the roughness may protrude through the
vapour film and initiate rewetting). Evidence for this was reported by
observed for the bottom flooding case but for the falling film case, rewetting
delay was decreased by surface roughness. No explanation for this has yet
been offered.
Effect of Transient
study was carried out by Tachibana (1973) who measured boiling curves for a
variety of fluids during steady state pool boiling and quenching. The
quenching boiling curves were derived from the temperature-time history which
makes the results less accurate. Nevertheless, Tachibana's results show that,
Thompson (1970) also studied the pool boiling curves during quenching and
and hT_ for the transient runs. Unfortunately, the heated surface had become
cruc'.ded during the quenching runs thus making their comparison questionable.
General
ponding to the critical heat flux, the heated surface temperature will
usually fluctuate between the nucleate and film boiling curve. Eventually
with a small further increase in heat flux, the temperature will steady out
along the film boiling curve. This might result in physical failure of the
heated surface.
controlled system (in which case certain stability criteria must be satis-
tigations, and gives the ranges covered. In this section derails of exper-
imental methods will be discussed. Since this review deals with forced
Electronic Feedback
(0.487" OD, 0.005" ID annulus heated by a 0.005" platinum wire) where the
bridge became unbalanced for heater temperatures different from the required
heater temperature, and the bridge signal was used to control power.
A - HEAT FLUX CONTROLLED SYSTEM
B - TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED SYSTEM
C - HEAT FLUX CONTROLLED SYSTEM I•01 T H AUX ILI ARY HEAT FLUX SPI KE
D - TRANSIENT TESTING US NG HIGH THERMAL IN ERT IA HEATER
/
%
^ / \ \
<v /
$/
/A,B,C,D B, D Ei,C, D A,B ,C,D
s
T
= W"TSAT
A similar system has been used by Peterson (1971) and Sakurai (1974) in a
pool boiling study. Although this setup seems very promising, the data by
Peterson have a limited value since his heater geometry (0.005" OD, 2" b^-ted
length) differs greatly from heater geometries of interest. The boiling curve
derived from Peterson's data is based on the assumption that the heated
surface temperau-re is uniform in the axial direction. For long heaters this
test section power was controlled by the deviation from a preset temperature
Both McDonough (1961) and Ramu (1975) used a system where heat was
Ramu (1975) used an ann.ilar geometry (1" OD, 0.54" ID) for the boiling fluid
which was internally heated by mercury. Assuming a flat wall between the
(
Tj
) = UCV-T ) = 11,(1 -T .) = ~-(T ,-T .) = h_(T _-T J
1 sat 1 1 wl o wl w2 2 w2 sat
where subscript 1 refers to the heating fluid and subscript 2 to ,_he boiling
!;ast fluid. The ij) vs, AT relationship for both fluids and the wall is shown
boiling mode.
'SAT
HEATING
FLUID
a STABLE OPERflTlOW DURING T R A N S I T I O N BOiLiNG
TEST F L U I D
'HI
'SAT
b. U N S T A B L E OPERflTION D U R I N G T R A N S I T I O N B O I L I N G
FIG 12 0 vs AT R E L A T I O N S H I P FOR B O I L I N G S Y S T E M S H E A T E D BY H E A T I N G F L U I D S
22
overall temperature
v difference T,-T at the maximum exceeds T,-T at
1 sat 1 sat
the minimum, the heat flux will suddenly drop from <j> to a value close to
in3.x
d> . (A-B in figure 12b) without permitting any measurements in the transi-
mxn
tion boiling region (A-C).
length was only 3 inches. His setup is shown schematically in figure 13.
Ignoring the temperature variation across the tube wall, the total heat
removal rate from the tubular heater (per unit of surface area) is:
• -•i+^2- VVTl)+h2(VTsat}
where subscript 1 refers to the stabilizing fluid and subscript 2 to the
As can be seen from figure 13, the system permits stable operation
in the transition boiling mode provided the slope of the <j> vs. T curve
saturation temperature.
'SAT
TEST
FLUID
STABILIZING FLUID
F I G . 13 vs T w R E L A T I O N S H I P F O R B O I L I N G S Y S T E M U S I N G S T A B I L I Z I N G F L U I D ( E L L I O N , 1 9 5 4 )
24
Transient Technique
Plummer (1973)) and Westinghouse as a part of the FLECHT tests. In the G.E.
tests power was applied to a 4" long, 0.492" ID test section (wall thickness
0.254") until film boiling was established. The power was subsequently cut
off and the temperature at several locations along the test section was
time recording (e.g., see figure 14). In most experimental set-ups the
inverse heat conduction problem must also be solved. A similar method was
by far the simplest methods for forced convective systems. However, they
(1) Axial gradients in temperature are present. These axial gradients may
impossible.
test section with internal flow) or embedded in the heated surface (for
- I T .MIN
TRANSITION
BOILING
CHF
V _L
NUCLEATE
;AT BOILING
TIME, t
0 - C
FIG. 14 DERIVATION OF BOILING CURVE FROM TEMP-TIME TRANSIENT LUMPED PARAMETER MODEL
26
deducing the inside heated surface heat flux and temperature can result
in large errors.
(3) Flow parameters are not steady because of variation in heated surface
tion boiling data, tabulated in Table I. None of these data sets can be con-
The "comments" column of Table I lists the sources of uncertainty for each
data set.
transition boiling studies have recently been initiated in Canada and the
U.S.A.
General
wall superheats. For the correlations which do not have this feature an
27
h = A exp(-BAT )
D S
the heated surface on a time average basis (or the average wetted area at any-
correlation:
In the transition region just beyond CHF, and at low quality flow,
h T B ~ A exp(-BATs)
1
B ~ AT
max
and also
= -.AT
q)max e max
. max ,
or A ~ e.— = e.h
AT max
max
therefore
h = C h exp
{ AT ) h fTmax-T ]
b - max " A TT ~ = m ax
max T T
^ max''
max'' \ max satj
At the minimum heat flux, the boiling heat transfer coefficient approximately
(T -T ,
, , max min
h . « h exp •- r,
c,mm
c ,mm max
max T -
-T _
' max sat
29
Tong (1970, 1972) has presented two correlations: one for high
pressures and one for low pressures. The correlations are plotted in
1
J
It is seen that the correlations show f'he familiar boiling curve shape.
They also extend to the film boiling region with the correct trend in mass
flux and quality. As can be seen <£ and the corresponding temperature
nicLX
AT ar>i almost constant, independent of any system parameters. There is
for the range 500-2000 psia. The same was found to be true for Tong's low
Mattson developed two correlations: one for tubes and one for
bundles. They both have a very small boiling component compared with the
tions show a negative quality effect on the heat transfer coefficient in the
film boiling region. This does not agree with our physical understanding of
the film boiling process and with experimental observations (Bennett (1967),
107
P = 1000 PSIft P = 1000 PSIA
X E = 0.3 G = 105 Ib/h .ft2
D e = 0.4 IN. Do = 0.4 IN.
G= 2.5x1O6 Ib/h .ft 2
104
0 400 800 1200 1600 0 400 80U 1200 160U
V T SAT- °F V T S A T - °F
FIG. 15 EFFECT OF MASS FLUX AND QUALITY ON TONG'S (1970) CORRELATION
31
i
CM
CD
00
jo
C3
M/nia) 3
\ \ X
A\A\ \ X
\
\ \
o
o
\\
— D
CD
CO
O
-Q \ O T —
q d O
— \ X
7 O o
\ CO I X T— O
LA
CO \ O \
fNI
•
0 7
o
o \
—
el
LA
fNJ
'I /
O CD
A O
CO
a-
. II
/
/
/A 00
Ifh
CD
o
LA o o
k
/
o
II II II o
CO CO
X
X O
(a) (b)
10' 107
I I I I I ! I i !
P = 1000 PS!A De = 0 . 4
X = 0.1 P = 1000 PSIA
G = 105 I b / h . f t 2
G=2.5 x10 6 Ib/h . f t 2 _ DB= 0 . 4I N .
10s.
CO
-e- 105
X = .90
104
0 400 800 1200 1600 0 400 800 1200 ifeOO
VTSAT« °F VTS»T.°F
o
>-
o a
o
<c
X
1
u.
o
o
fNI
CO
CO
*"~ "=£
1—
CO
11
o o
o
00 • 1—
CJ
LU
LL.
LL.
o LU
o
CO
CD
o o
34
high flow, the CHF is much reduced, which is contrary to usual observations.
Also, at high flow (above 106lb/h.ft2) the correlation predicts a very low
boiling component, with the result that the entire boiling curve resembles
In a later paper (Ramu and Weisman (1975)), the authors found that
this correlation did not agree with their experimental data, which were
obtained at low flow and high quality conditions. They corrected their
vection film boiling heat transfer coefficient, together with a boiling and a
does not depend on flow or quality, but is pressure dependent. At low flows
500
CD
- 100
CD
-15 i-—
•e-
|
104 10"
0 400 800 1200 1600 0 400 BOO 1200 1600
T -T °F T -T °F
'W ' S A T , h 'w ' S A T , h
F I G . 19 EFFECT OF PRESSURE AND MASS FLUX ON RAMU'S ( 1 9 7 4 ) CORRELATION
1 .0
.2 -
.2 .4 .b 1 ,0
VOID FRACTION
en
P = 15 PSIA
P = 50 PSIA
P = 1 0 0 PS I ft
1200 1600
°F SAT,
FIG 21 EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON HSU'S (1975) FIG. 22 E L L I O N ' S LOW PRESSURE TRANSITION
CORRELATION BOILING CORRELATION (1954)
38
Phenomenological Correlations
type correlation where the effect of slip between liquid and vapour phase is
for. The equation however is based on data from Bennett (1967) which were
(j>FB = <M1-*)
For a given system at a fixed exit quality and wall superheat, we may write
where C is a constant.
Iloeje's model takes into account virtually all important physical mechanisms;
droplet flow regime. For these reasons it has been left out of the comparison.
Empirical Correlations
(16, 60 psia), two flows (1.1, 5 ft/s) and two subcoolings (50°F, 100°F).
, _ 1( Tw -T
q>
_
sat
CHF ~ I
and -4.1, while Groeneveld (1976) obtained a better agreement with the data
and n = -3; for n = -3 the transition boiling region seems rather steep,
restricted to the pressure range shown in Table I. Outside this range the
calculated heat flux values become unreasonably large at low pressure due
are compared with the applicable correlations. On some of the graphs some
correlations, fall well beyond the range of the graph. This is indicated
CD
5
10 •e-
( VJ= -I(GROENEVELD)
\
1
(PETERSON) ' "
104 i 1 1 I 10'
0 400 800 1200 1600 0 400 800 1200 1600
T -T °F T -T °F
'w 'SAT, r 'w 'SAT, r
FIG 23 BERENSON TYPE CORRELATION FOR FIG. 24 EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON McDONOUGH,
LOW FLOW MlLICH AND KING CORRELATION (1981)
exponent of wall superheat of -3 and -1 respectively.
of the test section and therefore comparison of his data with correlations
figure 25, Hsu's correlation is the closest to Ellion's and also to the
boiling region.
this are:
(i) Plummer noted that there was an oxide film present on the
VTSAT
FIG.. 25 COMPARISON OF TRANSITION BOILING CORRELATIONS WITH
ELLION'S DATA
44
106
105
TUBE
G = 99,fe00 Ib.h " ' f f 2
P - 1000 PSIA
• EXP. DATA
I I I L
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
T
V S»T en
FIG. 26 COMPARISON OF TRANSITION BOILING CORRELATIONS WITH PLUMMER'S
DATA
45
Peterson's data are plotted in figure 27. The trend of the data is
Ellion's correlation overpredicts the heat flux but displays the same trend as
the data.
Ramu's data lie below all the correlations (figure 28) except the
AT,,,,-,. At the typical system parameters of the data (G = 130,000 lbm/ft^h and
X = 0.A5), the void fraction is close to one, thus giving a very low value of
$_„„ (figure 20). We therefore adopted Hsu's (1975) recommendation that <?>„„_
be not less than 90,000 Btu/ft^h. With this value Ramu's correlation is
replotted on figure 28. As can be seen, the revised correlation still lies
above the data and the trend is not in close agreement. No other data at high
quality, low flow and low pressure are available to compare with the revised
correlation.
The FLECHT* experiment was carried out in a 49- and a 100-rod bundle,
injecting subcooled water at the bottom of the channel. Local coolant param-
eters are not known but are calculated, the largest- uncertainty existing in
the coolant enthalpy and surface heat flux (due to severe axial conduction
near the rewetting front). Hsu's correlation gave the best fit to all FLECHT
10
I ELLII
TONG (LOW PRESSURE;
105
I—
CO
ANNULUS
G = 1 ,420,000 Ib.h ft -2
P = 14.7 PSIA
AT slJB = 0°F
• EXP. TATA
104
40 80 100 120 140 160
VTSAT
FIG,. 2 7 COMPARISON O F TRANSITION BOILING CORRELATIONS WITH PETERSON'S
DATA
TONG (LOW PRESSURE)
ELLION
HSU
CD
•e-
ANNULUS
G = 13,000 Ib.h ft"-2
P = 27 PSIA
X = 0.45
• EXP. DATA
104L
50 00 150 200 250
data although Tong's low pressure transition boiling correlation also seemed
to agree with most data. A sample of the FLECHT data is shown in figure 29.
Discussion
data was poor. This was to be expected as the data used were unreliable and
each set of data covered only a very limited range of condition • (Table I ) .
Figures 25-29 showed that the slope of the data on a log <j> vs. log
between the correlation labelled Groeneveld and the data is artificial since
experimental data for the CHF and AT_,-F were used as an input in the
correlation:
-1
T -T
w sat
CHF AT
exp CHF,exp_
the exception of a single point, the data have been lost (Ramu (1*374)).
10B
ELLION
XL
\—
CD
1 1 1 1 i
800 900
100 200 ^00 400 500 6U0 700
VTSAT
have been carried out. The available studies suffer from serious short-
the film boiling mode will suddenly be rep]ac.ed by the nucleate boiling
mode (or vice versa during dryout occurrence). In both cases the assumption
that film boiling rather than transition boiling takes place will result
4. During transition boiling, roost of the heat is carried away during the
fraction of time that nucleate boiling takes place. Hence the observed
parametric trends for nucleate boiling are also valid for the transition
boiling region.
5. Present transition boiling correlations are valid only for the narrow range
present state of the art permits the approximate predict on of c|> ; the
uncertainty.
51
REFERENCES
BANKOFF, S.G. and Mehra, V.S., A Quenching Theory for Transition Boiling,
BENNETT, A.W., KEARSEY, H.A., and KEV.YS, R.K.F., Heat Transfer to Mixtures
(1964).
BENNETT, A.W., HEWITT, G.F., KEARSEY, H.A., and KEEYS, R.K.F., Heat Transfer
BERGLES, A.E. and THOMPSON, W.G., The Relationship of Quench Data to Steady-
State Pool Boiling Data, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 13_, 55-68 (1970).
DREW, T.B. and MUELLER, A.C. , Boiling, Trans. A.I.Ch.E., _3J3, 449-473 (1937).
DUFFEY, R.B., CLARE, A.J., POOLE, D.H., BOARD, S.J., and HALL, R.S.,
ERA, A., GASPARI, G.P., HASSID, A., MILANI, A., and ZAVATTARELLI, R.,
CISE-R-184 (1966).
GROENEVELD, D.C., The Thermal Behaviour of a Heated Surface at: and Beyond
Invited paper A.N.S. Topical Meeting on VJater Reactor Safety, Salt Lake
No. 1 (1972).
HENCH, J.E., Forced Flow Transition Boiling Experiments in a Two Rod Test
HESSE, G., Heat Transfer in Nucleate Boiling, Maximum Heat Flux and Transition
HEWITT, G.F. and HALL-TAYLOR, N.S., Annular Two-Phase Flow, Pergamon Press,
OxfOiA, (1970).
IKEMOTO, I., TAKAYASU, M., UENO, N., and MICHIYOSHI, I., Heat Transfer to
IL.OEJE, O.C., PLUMMER, D.N., and ROHt>£NOW, W.M., Transition from Film Boiling
1LOEJE, O.C., PLUMMER, D.N., GRIFFITH, P., and ROHSENOW, W.M., An Investi-
ILOEJE, O.C., PLUMMER, D.N., ROHSENOW, W.M., and GRIFFITH, P., A Study of
Wall Rewet and Heat Transfer in Dispersed Vertical Flow, MIT Technical
JORDON, D.P., Film and Transition Boiling, Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 5,
Two-Phase Flow and Heat Transfer in Rod 3undles, paper presented at the
KATTO, Y., YOKOYA, S., and YASUNAKA, M., Mechanism of Boiling Crisis and
KEEYSS R.K.F., RALPH, J.C., and ROBERTS, D.N., Post-Burnout Heat Transfer in
from a Flat Horizontal Plate, Brit. Chem. Eng., jL4. No. 5 (1969).
KESSELRING, R.C., ROSCHE, P.H., and BANKOFF, S.G., Transition and Film
LEE, D.H., Studies of Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Relevant to Sub-
(1970).
McDONOUGH, J.B., MILTCH, W., and KING, E.C., *n Experimental Study of Partial
Tube, Cham. Eng. Prog. Symposium Series, 5_7_, No. 32, 197-208 (1961).
McGINNIS, F.K. and HOLMAN, J.P., Individual Droplet Heat-Transfer Rates for
Splat, jring on Hot Surfaces, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, L2_, 95-108
(1969).
MERTL, H. and CLARK, J.A., Boiling Heat Transfer Data for Liquid Nitrogen at
2'»6-250 (1961).
NESIS, E.I., Boiling of Liquid, Soviet Physics Uspekhi, lisp. Fiz. Nauk, 87_,
615-653 (1965).
Nucleate and Film Regions, Trans. Japan Soc. Mech. Engrs., 29, No. 204,
NObEL, L., The Heat Transfer Coefficient as a Function of Steam Quality for
EUR-4561 (1^/0).
56
NUKIYAMA, S., Maximum and Minimum Values of Heat Transmitted from Metal to
PETERSON, W.C., ZAALOUK, M.G., and GOETZE, A.J., Development and Evaluation
PETERSON, W.C., ABOUL FETOU11, M.M., and ZAALOUK, M.G., Boiling Curve
Nucl. Eng. Society ,Conference on Boiler Dynamics and Control ir. Nuclear
PIGGOTT, B.D.G., WHITE, E.P., and DUFFEY, R.B., Some Observations on the
PLUMMER, D.N., ILOEJE, O.C., GRIFFITH, P., and ROHSENOW, W.M., A Study of
PLUMMER, D.N., ILOEJE, O.C., ROHSENOW, W.M., GRIFFITH, P., and GANIC, E.,
POLOMIK, E.E., Transition Boiling Heat Transfer Program, Final Summary Report
RAMU, K. and WEISMAN, J., A Method for the Correlation of Transition Boiling
Surface, Rev. Roumaine Phys., Acad. Rep. Populaire Romaine, 9_, No. 1,
63-73 (1964).
SIMON, F.F. and SIMONEAU, R.J., Transition from Film to Nucleate Boiling in
STEVENS, J.W. and WITTE, L.C., Transient Film and Transition Boiling from a
STEVENS, J.W. and WITTE, L.C., Film and Transition Boiling Around Spheres,
STEVENS, J.W. and WITTE, L.C., Transient Vapor Film Behavior During
(1960).
58
TONG, L.S. and YOUNG, J.D., A Phenomenological Transition and Film Boiling
TONG, L.S., Two Phase Flow and Boiling Heat Transfer, John Wiley & Sons (1965).
TONG, L.S., Heat-Transfer Mechanisms in Nucleate and Film Boiling, Nucl. Eng.
TORIKAI, K., HORI, M., AKIYAMA, M., KOBORI, T., and ADACHI, H., Boiling Heat
TORIKAI, K. and AKIYAMA, M. , Analysis of the Second Burnout, JSKE, _13_, No. 61
(1970).
WACHTERS, L.H.J., De warmte overdracht van een hete wand naar druppels in de
WESTWATER, J.W. and SANTAGELO, J.G.. Photographic Study of Boiling, I rid. and
WITTE, L.C. and STEVENS, J.W., The Effect of Subcooling on the Onset of
ZUBER, N., On the Stability of Boiling Heat Transfer, Tr'ansan lions ASMI-:,
ZUBER, N., TRIBUS, M., and WESTWATER, J.W., The Hydrodynamic Crisis in Pool
NOMENCLATURE
A Constant
B Constant
C Constant
f Friction factor
h Enthalpy Btu/lbm
L Ltngth ft
P Pressure psia
T Temperature °F
U Velocity ft/h
X Quality
61
Greek
a Void fraction
£ Roughness height ft
p Density lbm/ft 3
AT Local subcooling, T s -T °F
Subscripts
a Actual value
e Equilibrium value
g Saturated vapour
i Inside, inlet
1. Liquid
m Maximum
max Maximum
min Minimum
o Outside, outlet
62
s oaturation value
V Vapour
w Heated wall
Abbreviations
FB Film boiling
TB J ransition boiling
TABLE I
TRANSITION BOILING DATA OF WATER
IN A FORCED CONVECTIVE SYSTEM
RANGE OF DATA
GEOMETRY REFERENCE P G v 10 6 * i 10 5 Subcooiing COMMENTS
psia lbm/ft2h Btu/ft2h (°F) or
Quality
TAbLE. I I
M DotiouBh ( I S b l )
l t l t l 6 ( i : 1 1
"ill * ")•» * - • > 1 ' - " - " V
ilO'J
hKB - «9C rcr ( -. HUu'F
r.ir r • hOi>°r
( J i l ) ) x
' ' K L ' ' • ' u.-i tr • . " • t . ' " ' ' . ' ' " \
h ; j j • voo»i« ? (-u.orr,.-. i^ + h
! ' . - 'JO O.'j-IH in/" Id - 1*<J°F
l» ' "r..J
1 l a d i n g d.it.i iFLECinj.
Ik
'Vb • o-o-i'oi."•'}*••*, : t l r a n «u Is t m i a t l w l y
! T 7 •" ' r . i
long U97..1)
h 0.25- 2 . 'i 7
'is" u * \ rt l t l c . i l ccrrcldL Ion iliiL- lo
Julii'-. BolUnv, ctmpun-'nt
(lttL-<l in ditii ol Ik'ntt.
19ft41, i'olonilk (19(.7),
Cumo (1971), Nobel (1170)
\ M ,"•''•; i 1
" « » " . ! ' - "
r
- . ' ; " • *
with BuppreHsion fart.T S
Tut'i- (d>je u- Cht>n (1S63)); !•
1 * w] a li«!iml on c r i t i c a l hca' m
i lux dnta of Addons
(pool b o H i n n ) .
I: ) ' , | ° ' - 1 4 I i : "
,, . ,, , , , , , . 2 ; £ . * i - n. j
• ,"•••; " u ] >• ; s B ' 1 •' ' '
1 0 •»p(-(J. W1" T) >0O - 112'j 0 . '> - 1. h 0 . 1 - O.'JM ,\ib<! t, Cor rt: U i Urns iibinined
':»», FI. • '•"'' " '
from Ifnc.ir roiiresfiioi.
m a l y s i s . 2HI rwa
1
i r. ( ' '
' i !
' ' r
" '
"'''' „ - 0 . 1 0 ^ 0 . [H'f x -ri,i | (
B
65
S u b c o n l i n > ; *(•'
ISSN 0067-0367
KOJ 1J0
1198-76