Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A. H. P. SKELLAND
Research & Development Laboratories, Thomas Hedley & Co., Limited, Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Abstract-This work on a votator was undertaken to correlate the scraped. film coefficient of
heat transfer, h,, with operating conditions, plant dimensions and physical properties of the fluid.
‘4 All the available data, which include runs on the cooling of glycerol, water and two similar
glyceride oils in four votator-assemblies, are provisionally correlated by the dimensionless
The ratio of shaft to tube diameter, D,/Dt, varied little throughout the work, from 0.75 to
091, so that any effect of this ratio is included in the constant of 4.9.
There is some indication however, of the existence of flow regimes analogous to streamline,
transitional and turbulent conditions in flow through conduits and in conventional liquid mixing
operations. This evidence indicates that exponents on the groups D,N/v and Dtv p/p are
higher in the turbulent range than the values appearing in the above equation.
R6zum&--Ce travail sur un “ votator,” a et6 entrepris dans le but de relier le coefficient
d%ehange de chaleur a travers le film balaye, h,, aux conditions operatoims, propri&s physiques
du fluide et caracteristiques de l’appareil. Toutes les donnes, disponibles, comprenant des essais
le refroidissement du glycerol, de l’eau et de deux glycerides homologues dans quarte assemblages
de votators, satisfont a la relation sans dimension suivante :
Le rapport de l’arbre au diam&re du tube D,/D, a pm vari6 au corns de ces travaux (de 0,75
B O,Sl), de telle sorte que la constante 4,9 suffit a rendre compte du phenomene pour cette falble
variation.
11 existe cependant quelques indications sur les regimes d’&oulement analogues aux r&imes
laminaiis transit&es et turbulents dans les conduites et dans lea operations de melange.
Ces remarques montrent que les exposants des groupes D&V/v et Dfu p/p sont plus grands en
r&ime turbulent que les valeurs mentionnees dams l’equation precit6e.
Das Verh<nis von S&aft - zu Rohrdurcbmesser (D,/DJ gndert sich nur wenlg innerbalb
dieser Untersuchungen, nZimlich von 0,76 his 0,81, so dam ein etwaiger Einfluss dleses Quotienten
in der Konstaten 4,9 enthalten ist.
Es gibt einige Anzeichen fur die Existenz von Sttimuirgsbereichen iihnlich der laminaren,
ubergangs - und turbulenten Form bei der Kanalatrijmung oder den iiblichen Mischverfahren
von Fliissingkeiten. Im turbulenten Bereich sind n&m&h die Exponenten der Kenngriissen
DIN/v und D#v p/p hijher als sie in der obiien Gleichung erscheinen.
166
Correlation of scraped-8lm heat transfer in the votator
167
~o
II
. ~ ~ ~ @ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ,
~°
~tt %
It_t~
..~ ..~ .~
168
Correlation of scraped-film heat transfer in the rotator
~J
A
i!
169
A. H. P. SKELLANIJ
1
-=‘+f+$
outiat u h= m ,
I%. 1. Longitudinal and cross-sectional diagrams of
Here h,,, is the usual metal wall coefficient, given by
ammonia-jacketed laboratory votator.
dividing the thermal conductivity by the metal thickness.
w/v.
Here D;o p/p remained constant for each curve,
cp p/k remained constant for each substance, and
Ds/Dt and L/4 remained constant throughout.
The slope of Fig. 2 shows f to be about 0.17.
The significance of the line for water is discussed
later.
1ooc
1000 10000
%, otvp
CL
FIG. 4.
,
171
A. H. P. SICEXJAND
lOO(
Slope=c.a.0*47
/’ 0
0
Glycerol. small vntator
Oil A. small votator
,f/X’
A 0 Oil B. large votator. (2 tubes)_
+ Oil B. large votator . @tubes)
X Water. small votator
X Water. (from Houlton)
Flo. 6.
lo
%
-L
1 loo0
172
Correlation of scraped-film heat transfer in the votator
The equation relating to the line on Fig. 7, would indicate that turbulence is only fully
which contains all the available data, is :- developed in the case of the water runs.
h Dt
-&= Table 6. Ma&mum and minimum values of
k
Pt - WV P/P andD,iWp/t.l
4.9
Fluid tot - 08) ” P/P %,=N P/P
The equation has been determined for values of
D,/Dt between 0.75 and O-81. Min. Mm.
Slope ~0.57
d= 4-Q
Glycerolmnall votdor
Oil A.small votator I
Oil 8, large votator, (2 tubes)
Oil B, large votdor, (3 tubes)
Water, small wtator
Water (from Houlton) l-
1000 low0
178
A. El. P. SrmILAND
Fig. 4 suggests an exponent of the order of 0.9 perature difference between ammonia and the
for the group L+v p/p in the turbulent region. votated fluid was used ; this practice is only valid
Although the groups L/D,, D,/Dl and cr p/k are if constant specific heat can be assumed as in the
constant for Fig. 4 more data are clearly needed case of water and glycerol. It is believed that this
to establish this exponent under turbulent assumption can be largely justified in the case of
conditions. Analogy with correlations for stream- oils A and B despite their partial phase change
line and turbulent flow through conduits indicates within the votator, in view of their substantially
that the exponent on the group L/D, will at least linear relationship between equilibrium solid
bc reduced for turbulent conditions, due to content and temperature. Thus, over most of
reduced entrance effe&s. the temperature range through which the oil is
It seems from the above observations that the cooled, it has an effective specific heat com-
exponent on the Prandtl group in equation (8) pounded of nearly constant amounts of latent
may be a hybrid value obtained by combining and sensible heat.
data for streamline and turbulent flow. Accord-
ingly the correlation must be regarded as Physical properties of oila A and B
provisional pending further data on the existence A perfect correlation in Pig. 7 is partly prevented
of more than one flow regime and on the various by the shortage of accurate physical data for
group-exponents at high Reynolds numbers. oils A and B, necessitating extrapolations and
It appears, then, that the situation regarding the use of typical values.
equation (8) may resembIe that underlined by In particular, since the true viscosities for oils
comments of PRATT [s] when comparing his A and B at sub-cloud-point temperatures are
own correlation with that of CHILTON, DREW not known, it may be felt that the data for these
and JEBENS [Q] for heat transfer in agitated substances lie on the general line of Pig. 7 by a
vessels. PRAY&S comments strongly suggest that coincidence connected with the use of “ pseudo ”
the well known single-line correlation of CHILTON, viscosities derived from the extrapolation of
DREW and JEBEN~actually spans more than one Fig. 9. However, it should be noted that ex-
flow regime. Comments relevant to this latter ponents on groups containing viscosity (namely
topic also appear in discussions of BROWN, D;u p/p and cp p/k) have not been derived ex-
SCOTTand TOYNE [l]. clusively from data for oils A and B, but have
Features of equation (8). The constants in the been obtained independently from data for
correlation have been found from experiments in glycerol in the case of Dp p/r (Fig. 8) and from
which the fluid was being cooled. The fluid adjacent data for glycerol and water in the case of cp p/k
to the scraped metal wall would thus be colder (Fig. 6) ; true viscosities for glycerol and water
and more viscous than in the main steam. are, of course, known.
Slightly different constants might be expected Furthermore, partial cancellation in the groups
if the fluid were being heated, since the tem- D,v p/p and cp p/k leaves viscosity to the rather
perature gradient and hence the viscosity pattern low power of - 0.1 which may partially account
would be reversed. for the close agreement of data for oils A and B
A eomparison between the exponents on the with the provisional correlation, despite the use
groups D$/v and D;o p/p indicates that the of “ pseudo ” viscosities in place of true values
rate of heat transfer is not dominated by the for these substances.
mutator speed and that the contribution afforded
by linear flow velocity through the votator must Contact between blades and tube wall
be considerable. It is known that even slight clearance between
the edges of the scraper blades and the tube wall
Logarithmic mean temgwrature difference may lead to considerable reductions in heat
In calculating over-all coefficients from the transfer [Q]. Because of the “ floating ” blades
experimental data the logarithmic mean tem- used in this work the assumption has been made
Carehxtion of scrrrped-fUmheat trsnsf’er in the votator
that close contact between blade-edges and wall Acknoroledge me&.9-Useful comment was given
is maintained; this should be true at least for by Mr. L. H. FROOB~S, and the author is grateful
water and glycerol, and by taking D,,JDt equal to Mr. H. R. GALLEYMORE, Director of the
to unity throughout the assumption has been Chemical Division of Thomas Hedley & Co. Ltd.,
extended to the partially crystallizing oils A for permission to publish this paper.
and B.
NOMENCLATURE
Factors
notimluded h the correlation AC = “Effective” scrapedheat transfer surfacefts
The effects of variation in mutator design have % = Specificheat B.t.u/lb”F
not been included, for instance with regard to De = Conduit inner diameter, or equivalent
diameter of an annulus ft
the shape of the cross-section of the shaft, the
Di = Impeller diameter ft
variation of the ratio’ D,/Dt, the number of blades, Dm = Mutator diameter (2 x distance from
and the clearance between blade-edges and tube blade edge to shaft axis) ft.
wall. More work is needed to incorporate the Da = Diameter of mutator shaft ft
above factors and to distinguish more clearly Dt = Internal diameter of Votator tube ft
h, = Metal wall coefficient of heat transfer
between streamline and turbulent conditions.
B.t.u./ftohPF
hNH, = Ammonia 5lm coefficient of heat transfer
B.t.u./ft%P’F
h, = Scraped illm coefficient of heat tranbfer
B.t.u./ft%?F
k = Thermal conductivity B.t.u./ft%r=‘F/ft
lb = Length of scraper blade ( = L) ft
Zr = Length of votator tube ( = L) ft
L.M.T.D. = Log, mean temperature difference
between fluid being cooled and refrigerantOF
N = Mutator shaft speed rev/hr
Q = Total heat transferred/unit time B.t.u./hr
U = Over-all coefficient of heat transfer
B.t.u./ftohPF
u = Average axial flow velocity of fluid
through votator ft/hr
p = Fluid density lb@
p = Absolute fluid viscosity lb/R hr
4 = A proportionality constant -
18
1 Exponents :-
Ai- TDR a, b, c, 4 e, f, g, 6 j, n, P, q.
FIG. 8. Fxo. 9. r=d+e.
REFERENCES
BncwwR. W., Scan R. and TOYNE C. Trans. In&n. Chem. Engm. 1947 25 186,199.
CBILTON T. I-I., Dnuw T. B. and JE~IENSR. H. In&&r. En@@. Chem. (Zndnstr.) 1944 36 510.
ECKEY E. W. Vegetabk Fa& and Oik p.99. Reinhold Pub. Corp., New York, 1954.
FULT~N N. D., Lurro~ E. S. and WILLIER. L. J. Amer. Oil Chem. Sot. 1954 3198.
GREEN S. J. Trans. Ins&a.Chem. Engra. 19.58 31827.
HOWLTON H. G. In&&r. Eng,ng. Chem. (Indzcstr.)1944 36 522.
MCNBLLY M. J. J. Imp. Colt. Chum. Egng. Sot. 1958 7 18.
PRATT N. H. Trans. In&n. Chem. Engrs. 1947 25 170.
Unpublished work.
175