Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OF THE
\VORLD
EDITED BY
GWILYM LEWIS
BRIAN SCHRIRE
BARBARA MACKINDER
MIKE LOCK
© The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 200'1 foreword·· ···· ·· ···· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ······· vii
All righ1 s r's ·1-v •d . No pai1 c I' I his pub]j ·:11io11 may he re produced , stor •d in a rdrieval Preface · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ······· viii
system, or Lr:rnsmiued, in any ~ rm, or by any means, electroni -, mech~ink·tl ,
phot1)cupying, r ·cording or olh "rwise, w11hout writl •n permission of th · publis h r Acknowledgements · · · · . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··· · ·ix
un less ill a ·ordnn ·e with Llie provbions or tlie Copyright Designs and Patents A -L1988. Artists and photographers ·ix
Copyright permission · · · · · · · · · ...... . . ..... .... . . . ...... . ..... . x
Great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information contained in this
c;eneral acknowleclgements · · · · · · · · · . ........ ............. . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ···· ·xi
work. However, neither the publisher, the editors nor authors can he held responsib le
for any consequences arising from use of the information contained here in.
About the book ...... .. ...... . .... . ......... ·· xii
First published 200') by
Introduction · · ...... ...... .. .. . · 1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Richmond , Surrey, TW9 3AB, UK Leguminosae or Fabaceae? · · · · · · · · · · · ....... . ...... .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
www.kew.org Cbssification of the Leguminosae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . · · ......... . ............... ... . ... .. 3
Adv:mces in legume systematics · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . · ............. . . . .................... . . 4
ISBN 1 900347 80 6
Changes in generic alignment and tribal composition · · . .... . .............. ........ , ..... ... 4
L~conomi c importance of the legume family . ........... . , .. , ..... . .. , .. . . .. . . ..... 10
Production editor: Ruth Linklater
Typesetting and page layout: Christine Beard Complete synopsis of legume genera · · · · · · · · · · · .. ........................... .. .... . . .. 13
Cover design by Jeff Eden; cover photographs by Gwilym Lewis
Book design by Media lksources , Biogeography of the Leguminosae · '' •' •'' '''' o • o o' o o' o o'' I o o t o' o ' o' o o .. . . . •..... 21
Information Services Department, Introduction · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · .......... . ........... . ......... ... ... .... ... . .... 21
!loyal Botanic Gardens, Kew
lliomes · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ...... ' ... .. .... ............. . .. . ...................... 23
Printed in the United Kingdom hy The Bath Press (CPI Group) SysLematic biogeography of Leguminosae · · · · · · · · · · · · ....... . ... .. . ..... . .. ....... . .... 45
For information or to purchase all Kew titles please visit Tribes and Genera of Leguminosae ......... ......... . .. . ' .. .. ... . ..... . . .. .... . . 55
www.kewbooks.com or email publishing@kew.org Subfamily Caesalpinioideae
Tribe Cercic.leae o' ' o 0
. ... .. 57
o o 0 o o 0 o 0 0 o o 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 '0 o o o o o to 0 o
The Simpson Education & Conservation Trust Tribe Aca cieae . ....... ............... . ...... . .......... ..... 187
and three others who wish to remain anonymous. Tribe Ingeae .. . ...... ... ........ .... ..... .. .... . ............ 193
The editors warmly thank all the donors for their support which has helped to ensure Subfamily Papilionoideae
this book is accessible to those countries with the greatest legume diversity and highest
Tribe Swartzieae
- · · · · · · · · ..... . ........ . .. ... . ... . .............. . .......... ... 215
levels of endemism.
Tribe Sophoreae · · · · · · ... .. .. . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
Trihe Dipterygeae · · · · · · . .......... . ..... .. . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . 250 .
Trihe Brongniartieae · · · · ............ ..... . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 .
Tribe Euchrcsteae · · · · · · · · · · · · . · .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. 260
Tribe Thermorsic.leae ...... . . .. . ..... . ..... .... ..... ... . . ... .. . ..
. . 26
3
:;:rihc Poclalyrieae · ....... .... . .. ... .. ...... . .. .... ......... .... 26 7
11 he Crotalarieae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
CONTENTS v
Subfamily Papilionoideae (contd.>
283
Tribe Genisteae · .. ........
Tribe Amorpheae •' +' o > o '
....... t
f oreword
• • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ' • • • • • t • • 307
O 0 , O ' 0 ,, I'' O Ir '
Tribe Dalbergieae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
0 0 0
Tribe Mirbelieae · · · · · · · · ·
I 0 '' t
.. ..... . ' .................. 3c;c;
0 0 f > o 0' 0 o o 0 I Io 0 I 0'''
Tribe Bossiaeeae · · · · · · · · It is particularly appropriate that this fine book, the delimitation of tribes and subfamilies. The Editors
. . ... ... ' . ' . . ..... . . . ... . .. 361
Tribe Indigofereae ···················.·. . ............. . ... 367 covering all the genera of the Leguminosae, should - all from Kew - have drawn in 20 expert
Tribe Millettieae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ' · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ' · · · · c have heen written at an institute whose involvement in collaborators from all over the world. They have
.. .... ' . ' . .... . ........ .. ....... .. ..... 389 legume research is long and virtually continuous. skillfully woven together the traditional framework of
Tribe Abreae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
....... ' ............. ' ... ... ... . .. .. . . .. ... ... ' ............. 393 Legume work at Kew began with George Bentham in the classification of legumes with the new system,
Tribe Phaseoleae ·
...... ' . ....... . ... . ....... 433 o I 0 • o o o o o o o'
the middle of the 19th century. He was the first to placing this within a novel biogeographical setting.
Tribe Desmodieae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ..... , .... . ........ 447 provide an account of the whole family as he knew it, They have made the information uniquely accessible
Tribe Psoraleeae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · and much of his work on many legume groups is still through illustrating every one of the 727 genera,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . .. · · · · · · · 4S3
Tribe Sesbanieae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ' · · · · . . . . .................. 455 valid today. He was followed by ].G. Baker and Daniel commissioning 10') new illustrations where an
Tribe Loteae · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
> • 0 o o' • j I Io' I 0 o' 0' o o 0 o 0 I
Oliver, ancl by John Hutchinson, who in 1964 produced appropriate photograph, painting, or line drawing
... .... .. ... .. . ....... ' ............ 467 an account of all the legume genera known at that could not be found. They have consulted an enormous
Tribe H.obinieae · · · · · · · ' ' · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
............. . ........... ... 47') dale. During the latter half of the 20th century, J.B. number of publications and incorporated much new
Tribe Galegeae · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ' · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . .. . .. ' ...... 489
o • o • o '0 'o > 0 o o 0 o o I
Cilletl, J.P.M . Brenan, RM. Polhill and myself continued material during the preparation of the text .
Tribe I-Iedysareae , o t o 1 It I''''
.. . . . . ... . . . . . ' . . . . 496 this line, concentrating particularly on the floras of This work provides an encyclopaedic overview of
•••••••••••• t ' ••••••• - ' •• • ••
Tribe Cicereae ··········· ··· Tropical Africa. In 1978, Roger Polhill and others knowledge of the Leguminosae at the beginning of
Tribe Trifolieae ········ ·········· ·
............ . .. . .......... . .. . ... . ...... . 499
realised a longstanding aim of bringing together over the 21st century and is the first fully illustrated manual
............. . 50') '+ o o
400 scientists working on the legume family, to attend
t 0 0 0 lo t o o' Io I•
FOREWORD VII
v1 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Aclmowledgements
Preface
--mlJlflf,
hugJ m rphological div rsily of this vast pl:i nt fam il y. G.; Coates Palgrave, O .H.; Crozier, F.; Curtis, Wagenmgen slide collection; Wie ringa , J.J.; Weston,
·urr ·ntly r ·ognisecl legume genera.
A pau ·ityor illu. u-ations was highlight I a a gap that ]., Dahlgren, R.; Davies, A.; Drake· Edwards S. Elk.ans
L . E" ' , 'I '
P.H.; Westra, L.Y.Th.; Wojciechowski M: Zabeau R .
n ecl ~d L I " fill e d so tha t this li v1t. r. ity oulcl b ., i asmus, D.; Farrer, A. (nee Davies} Fitch W H .
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IX
and Flore du ongo Beige 3: 331, Pl. 2 1952) : Rt1111ire:wl/a mi ·rcfl1/ba . T. Warra , and A 111:1nu:d c r being so willing to assist in fund-raising and Amy
Copyright permission fo/m.miod ' 1ttlro11 lef. tontb11w; Flor du ongo Uclg ~ N ·w Guinea I gum s: .Agr1 nop , beptaµby lla and Stockwell for liaising with donors, and Suzy Dickerson
3: 377, Pl. 28 1952): Cossureilemde1ldlw1 /}{1/scun {/emm; Kingiorlendrnn allern((o//11m . W.J. Wiswall , and and Ann Lucas for helping with editorial and copyright
Th· >dl tors and autliurs wish I' > thank the institutions, Plor uu · ngo Belg ~ 3: 38'), Pl . 29 <195 . : on 1rihutions from the · .:. Nationa l Herharium : issues. We particularly acknowledge, with gratitude, the
journa ls, ·ditors and arli~u; who ha e kindly given Ps1.mclonwcroluln11 m meng ' i ; Flore du Congo I~ "lg 3: 'o/11p,e111 I 1. broussonetl fl ( pu blishcd as Cologrmicr enthusiasm of Philippe de Spoelberch for all matters
permission lo reproduce the rollowlng I In , drawini;s . 547, Pl. 40 ( I' 52): Al11/)bim c1s p1emccupoides; Flor du /e/11/.iS). Reim arutia: Ka!tlppiu c:ele/JiCCI. Bull . Jard . Bol. dendrological, and Hiroyosbi Ohashi for encouragement
Ph. lornt, und Puhlk:ition:-; cientifiqu •s du Mus •urn C ng> Belg It: 287. Pl. J7 <1953): 1<0!~1msi11pbyto11 n11itenzorg: !!11dertia spectcihf/.L'i. ln Lil ·a:,· if a small of this project from its inception . On the scientific side,
n ~1Li nal d'l li. toie nmurdl , P~u·is ©: Flore du ahon
m1'1d ,1:11stii. F.H. Erteeh ~1n l Fl >1-a of Libya: 11/byltis nvml er >f illustraci ns , for whi h th e litors hav as editors we are much obliged to all the authors who
vu l neraria ·ubs p . mmtra Bilumfnarict /.Jit11mi110.'it1 s ught repro lu ·Lion permission on more th-in 11 have contributed their expe1tise and time to provide a
I'> Pl. l 8 : 9 1 ( J968): Loesener61 wulkeri a nd L.
published as P. · Jral rt /Jitumilt< s 1 , l :'hrm11s pinna/ct <> ·c1sion , we h ' tV ·till r ·eivccl no response lo our truly global view of the legume family in this book. We
p,aim1P11 ·i:; Plor • tlu Gab >11 l 5, Pl. 19: 9 ( l968l :
a.nd H. am1ift1.i;wi, Hipp repis scabm, Lew ·11/i11aris, r •q u , srs. \Xie tru st that th ' edit.ors and artists involved owe a large debt of gratitude to Roger Polhill for laying
eocb ualierudendmn. stepbt111.ii· Flor du abon 15, Pl.
M •di ago po~ymo11>hci , Ononis 1wtri.x, S/Jc1rli hum will not I .. displ ased 1hat we hav" used th ir lin the foundations on which this book is based, and for his
20: t 9 l 9t 8): f lyine nost ~ · ta j7v1·i/)ll JU/ct and fl.
srtbcmw, 'Frigon 4/a I.el/ala an I Trtpodion tulrtl/Jbyl/11.m dr:iwings. The iJlustrnLions are: A1111nof1iplt1J1tb11 long-standing support and valuable advice throughout
nurnutn lii; Flor· dtt ·nhon 15, Pl. 39: l 73 ( 1968 :
(pu l Ii. h cl :is Anthy!lis tetmpbyllc1) . Davi I H. Lor n ·., mm1j:!O/( ·11s, BmclJ.J'CJ /ix vageleri, Cb" ·1teya com posit the project; we also thank Alan Radcliffe-Smith for
, "iizduropsi:> Mesllli; I l1>re du :rabon 15, Pl. 2: 1 8.~
Anm.1 Stnn , ~ind · nvon 4 _ : I ·O ( J9 ): Ktt1tafoc1 plate), DOl.1 ·11 ~>si p,erardi, 1uelde11stt1edtic1 bil'naluic:a, assistance with the etymology of generic names, Dick
(1968 : Augo11ardle1 letc:stui; Flore du ~abon 15, l'I.
ktiboolt:tw nsfs. A. McPherso n a n I N >v m 8 l l: 7 . ~>011gio ·mj>ellc1 in/ ~rmedi t and Vavilovia formusc1 . Brummitt for help with problems involving tribal
189 Cl' 8): A11thonotbo concbyliopbunun (originally
c1998): Hc11t1de11clmn acos/.a-solislc1111wt. A. M ·Pherson, nomenclature, Neil Brummitt for providing additional
publish >d ri . l:>omacrolo!Ji'um cu11cbyliopbomm); Flore
The lil'iSOL!ri BoLHILi ·al ra rd n Press, :inc.I wiLll the biogeographical data and taxon distributions; Justin Moat
lu G ~1hnn 15, Pl. 59: 2 5 ( 1908 : f,e0'/1f,/,/"d'nclro11
aulh r's onsent: /famrdia cam._p yla tmlha (pt1 l li1ihed for computer advice and generating figure 17; Sally
gab11·1pnse; and Flore du Gab >0 15, Pl. 71: 285 ( 1968):
Libre1Ji ll ~c1 kltlinei . Ph . Moral , :ind the Fl re du as Pitb 'C •lluhitl/JI C(llllpyla 't /.'/lfl.nts ' in Annnts or the General acknowledgements Dawson for preparing figure 16; Renee Fortunato for
issou ri 1301.anical Ga rd n 7. : 72!> ( 1986). l\ .H . providing information on Amburana, Anarthrophyllum,
amen un 9, Pl. 1 : 71 ( 197 ): G'll/ >llf demlron
pierrecm1t1n , C. mildbl'tPdii and ·. ki ant11e11se; Flore
axwell and Th e Arrnals or Lh ~ MiliSOUri 13 Utnid tl We most sincerely thank Chris Beard for typesetting the Bergeronia, Collaea, Galactia, Ceoffroea, Holocalyx,
du a111eroun 9, Pl. 17: 9 1 C 1970): Leonc1rc/oxa <1rd ·n ')7: 253 Jl70): G)1mho ·711w mseum. N. ilian, text and designing the layout, and especially for so Lophocarpinia, Pterogyne, Ramorinoa, Rbynchosia,
and Willd · no> ia l8: 228 C1998): lf >rpyw 3rct1tcl(/7um· p:lll ·ntly suf~ ting our many whim and sha1ing i.n our Tipuana, and Zuccagnia; Rosaura Grether for the
a}i'fcantl ; r lore dL1 .am ' roun 9, I'!. l : 95 ('I<70):
WiUdcn wia 18: 227 ( l '>88): B1:v(../. 'IJ'->11/{S, . 13 B 1 pain; Ruth Lin.I Im r for m Liculously pr< of-readin the distribution data of Mimosa; Keith Ferguson for his
Plci.gtnsipl cm longit11h1ts and P. muitfjugus; Flor· du
anProun 9, 1ll. 2 1: 1'11 (ll70 : l:.'z11-y/;efe1/um 13 rlin- D·1hl 111 . The m ri c n So · ie ly or J>l an.t t •xt and hr..dping to standardis it, :md al for her persistence in tracking down some final biographical
1mij·11.p,um., Jo:. but >sii a nd JI lessm.a.nn'if; Plor du T:1xono111.ists an I Mclissn Lu kov r r p rmissi )11 to wonderful supp01t throughout the editing process; Gina details, and Susyn Andrews, Ruth Clark and Alex George
use D sman1b11.s lJico rn11111 s first. puhli.<>h d ln Fullerlove, John Harris and Lloyd Kilton for assistance for proof-reading parts of the final manuscript. Out
·a m roun 9, PL 3 1: 151 197 )): 'J'c1.lbo1i'//ci. batesii and
Syst , 111ati · 13 tany lo nogrnpbs 3 : i. Fig. 2.2 19 3) . with production, time-lining, and budgeting; Jeff Eden thanks also to Alan Paton and Simon Owens for so
7'. eketensis; Flor" dLI ..ameroun 9, Pl. 32: 153 Cl' 70);
\'</. Burger, antl Fi ldi an~1 : T1ntlea leyer111c1rkif. T. for the cover design and John Stone for advice on design generously allowing us the time and resources to fully
Chi iia gabo1i>nsis ~1n I ·. J..~ tcti'nei; Fl o.r lu am roun
3
Entwisl , and Th Roy:d B< tani · :ml ·ns , .'ydn y: and layout; Rachel Pedder-Smith for permission to use realise our objectives with this book. We are most
9, Pl. 3 : 175 1970): /emcmocole11s 111i ·rc111tb11s· Pl re
Aeuicl 11byton r , onclitum. Pfutylo/Ji11 m o/tern~/oll11 ·1n her stunning legume painting for the book end-papers; grateful to Bernard Verdcourt for providing the foreword
du am roun 9, Pl. 55: 24~ ll 7 : ddo'lliudenclro11
:.111tl P. ibt11sc111. •11lw11 , Templ •to11ia hi/ol;ct and T Marilyn Ward for help in tracing illustrations and liaising and much help besides with nomenclatural problems,
111icrantb11m; rl r du ameroun , Pl. 3: 267 ( 1970):
i11ca.1u:t original! pu! !ish d in thre dlf~ I' Ill iSS I of with several artists on our behalf; Simon Dickson for plant identification and for his continued friendship.
Mi ·1·0/pl'il11i&1 his1t!CL.tla and M. brt122 willensi ·; Flore
the j iurn a l M.ucll , ria are repro<lu e I with tile
du <1111 ·roun 9, Pl. 65: 275 ( 1970 : Tetwberlini.tl
p , rm is ·ion of th Hoyal 13oc~ini · ardens l >lbourn ,
h{(olioltt/cl ; ~ml Flore du mn ·roun c , Pl. 7 J: :H3
<Ul l.J.11. Ross. /lllcu..-ros,1111c11-u:a 11urrocc1~) 1Xi: l'JJ rinL d
I 70) : . '/a c/.l ·yutb )11'SN.S slcwdlii. Ph . Morar, and
/\uans nia Jl. : p .-3- 1 ( 1'89: Lemurodenclron with p ·rmission from I3ol bi /\ngell , IC '. Uarnel y an I
apuronii. Ph . M wat, an I Fl. 1 ~ la ouvell · .al ~doni :
J.W. rim •s, 'ilk r.r <.:, g u;ui.a ·ast , monkey's arring:
gen •ri · syst m for th · symm lrous Mimosaceae of
. cbleinllz ia insnlam.111 . J "<1n - u " I Labat, an I
the Am<::rica:,. Pttrl l. lwrenw , Alhiz ia, and allies,
Pu! ll ·aLi on ."cl ntifi 1u s tlu Mu se um nali >mll
M ' rnoirs of th .. , York Botanical G'1rdcn 7 I), c
d'llisLoir naturdle, Paris©: Peltiera nitidc1 in Laba t, J -
. & u Pu y, .J. - A revi Ion < I' Pelliem, a po rly
1c96, The Ne\. York l30lani ·al a rd ·n Pr ~ss . L.J. .
van c.le r Macse n , and LI W<tg "ningen gri ultt1rnl
known and pro! al ly cxlinct genu:-; o f L ·guminosa
niv ·rslty P:ip ·rs : Le11cmn;. balos CCl/JjJClrid us an I
C,Papilio noitle:.te - A ·s ·hynome n ac rrom Ma lag- ts ar.
Adanso nia ser. 3, 19<1 : S"i- c I, Pig. 1997). P. Baas, Bowringia discolor . .L.j .G . van d r Maesen :
Jiaplom1vsiu monopbylla ln Ubct·ian I ligh forest Tr es
an I Flora Maksi:ina s · r. ·1, Jl(I ): 1')2 Fig. -4 ( 1 92):
Falcc1/a.rirt mohtccartM (publish cl as Parc1serictnlbes
I y A. '· Voorl1o ~v » l. . ielscn , and p•rn Botani a:
;! palttth11 · 1,res sul s1 . t >res and A . fJ •rfolit1 /ll,~ subsp.
fal t /./arht suhsp. ff,//C:alaritt); Flor~1 Malcs iana • ~r. 1,
j>billif)Sii. . Ca Lr wicjo, and Flora fhcric1 : Eropbncci
L1( I): 16 1, Pig. _5 (1992): 1Jriw1tl.Ps gr,,mt!Ulom; PIOl'a
la ll'Si:10·1 s r. I I l( J : l 3, Fig . ~:> }C92): !?ti ' /fca © Flora fh eri ·:1 70 : 3 8 ( I 9);
Walla ·eotlc:11clron cal-/Jicnm: :md 11 rn Mal siana s r.
Ecbi:nospur/11111 algibic11r11 Flora ll>erin1 7( l : l27
1. , 12(2: 7 15, Pig. 52 (JC ): Uiltl nlu. 1nod >s/a . P. Raas,
(1999). ,. d " Tomasi , an I Fl >rl:I Patagonica : Acle:111 i ,1
an I l3lum ·a :~O< J): 84 (198 ): Mast rsiu bak >ri and 1.
grt1c ilis ~ind Ade mia guttu/if(;J/'CI. . C mnor, and J.
a ·scll'nica; Bluml'a . 6( 1):1 ·11. 9 1): Forciia c1lf1!f7orct;
Arnold Arbor.: ;v11111ocltul11s dioico . F. . Zuloaga, and
I nr iniana 2 l . 2 ): 02 U978} Si •11<Hll"jWn11m
Blum a 37 l : H ( J992 : Sfwtbolohus latistip11!11.;
/?ergU. M. Ederra, a nd Acme Ag ·n · S. A. : Do/icboj1sis
Blum.ea 8 2 : 82 ( 1994): K1mstleria sarnwal.ten ·ts. P.
parap,tlC1rie11sf,~. in L~1s Leguminos:is A.rgenlim1s. 11.M.
13aas, <tn<l Plora r the Guhnas: Hocotl prouacen.si.s. E.
RohhrJ •ht, Th NaLional Botani · i:ud · n of B ·lgium H ~ rn {1n I ·z and An ~tl . Tnsl. Biol. Nat Aul n . Mex .:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XI
x LEGUMES OFTHE WORLD
Tit • intruduct o 1y t ~xr s L'i ea ·h tribe in its most current phytoc horia of White (1983) . For the Americas
phylogeneti · ·om xt and su mmarises the history of distinction is drawn between species numbers in the
rriba l cl ' limitation from 1981 hrough 1994 to 2004. The Caribbean, Central America, Mexico and North America
About the bool< 11
u0ll 'f of gen ra ~111d sp ·i •s in each tribe is included.
Also incl uded Is a diagr;1mmatic representation of the
from those in South America , as well as between
Ama zonia and circum- or extra-Amazonia. These
lat Sl Vi W of pltyJogeneti . relationships among genera divisions were informative on more detailed analyses
,---·m111.,. ,. r==::::::==- within th Lrib nncl w ith o ther related tribes. Groups of the biogeography of the family. Abbreviations used
of gen 'nl : upported in phylogenetic analyses are in the text are N = notth; S = south; E = east; W = west;
w;11ally referr d to a. clades; such aggregations that C = central and sp. = species (spp. in plural).
Editors (and authors): all from the Royal Botanic of legum · voluti n and g neri rel:ltionships, and
ha v · r lalivcl p or or no s uppott at present are called
thal tl1 w·n ra . houkl be arr;:ing I in ·yslt!ITI<lllc r I r. Etymology is given next, where the derivation of the
Gardens, Kew grc ups. T xtual I ox s ar ·olour coded. Blue boxes in
nee a . ystemali · a rrang menl had I cen ·hos ~n , Lb
wilym L •wis: i. L \.Vis@I w .org the li ~tgram intlicat taxa that are treated more fully gene ric name is explained. The main references used
scope or th ~ ulum . g rew l n ·ompass the la t l
Uri.an Schrire: B.S ltrir @ K w.org els Ii 're in d1e b ok and are cross-referenced to a when researching the origin o f names were: Wittstein
phylogen lie information from legume r s 'art'b centres
B~irhara Mackinder: B.Ma ·I ind r@ r<.e .org page m11nl ~r , w hile gr y boxes represent taxa fully (1856), Exel! (1960), Allen & Allen 0981), Quattroccbi
around th w rid and rrom the burgeoning \iterarure. (2000) and Stearn (2002), as we ll as the original place
Mile l.o :I : Roya l Botanic ar(h"U, I ·w (retired) 1r nt -'tl wi1hjn the trad itional circumscription of the
A nalurnl ext m;ion. of thL as to invite a number of
tribe u ncl r co n id ·ratio n. Buff-coloured boxes of publication. Greek and Latin prefixes and suffixes
legum xpen s from dif~ ~ r nt institutions to author a
represent other g roup ings of tax noml · ignifl a n e. were checked in Radcliffe-Smith 0998).
Authors ·e le tion of th tril n l acco unls I res •ntc I h.erc in .
References to re · otly publish d phylug nies on whi ·h
Juan Barh~11n : Roya l Botani · ·1rd ns, I w retir ~d ) Fou rte~ n tril s bav I e ·n ritlen by s p ·ialists fr m
the diagram is based are incJucl d in the figur ~ c~q tion Habit categories are simplified to trees, shrubs, lianas,
j en ny Chappill : niv fl;ity of W<:!slern Ausu·alia o utsi le I w, lifte n by Ke w I g ume rcsca r ·h ~rs
and, in detail, in the bibliography on pages 511-544. herbs , and occasionally suffrutices (where annual
Mil<e Crisp : Australian Nationa l niv ' t-siry, a nhe rra principa ll y th four editors of tl1e volu me and seven shoots appear from an underground woody base,
The text accompanying each genus follows a
Rogi r cl I ok: R yal n t:rni ' ardens, f e w ·re co-auth re I by T " and non-I w ·ollnb< rators . White , 1977). Shrubs branch from the base, and lianas
standard layout.
Feli Ii r •st: South African Na ti o na l Bi div e rsit y Th ~ fina l produ ·t ml in an lllu ·trat I guid to
are woody-stemmed climbers.
Institute I gum•. · l :n th fo r front of curr·n t leg um e The generic name is followed by the author(s) and
Renee Fortunato: Instituto de Recursos Biol6gicos, r hylog·n Li • r ~seM ·h ~111d tbis, in Lum is a signifi. , nl date of publication of the name. Author's names are Ecology broadly combines the ecoclimatic zones of
Bu nos Alr s step towa rd · a new lassifi ali n f the k:gume fUl1ily. Breckle (2002), Le., equatorial or aseasonal tropical,
abbrev iated according to Brummitt & Powell 0992).
I-kl n Irdand: ardiff University, Wales Th " Iner asi ng ly ·ompr h "ns iv, rhylogcnies now The date of publication of the name has been seasonally dry tropical, subtropical, Mediterranean,
P te r .Jobson: Royal 13 tru1 ic arclens , . ydney avai lab le fo r L gumino. a prov! le ~' n< v I too l t checked in Index Nominum Genericorum (Farr & Zilstra warm to cool temperate , and physiognomic vegetation
B nL Klltgaard : NaU.11'11 I-lisrory Museum , Lo ndo n explur di:;trihulion pauerns that have hitherto b en type following the definitions of White (1983), i.e.,
(eds.), http://ravenel.si.edu/ botany/ ing//ingForm.cfm)
Mall La vi n: Montan~1 State Univer ity, B >z m:tn imp ssil le to visualis at fam ily, o nlin ntn l a n I g l bal forest, woodland, bushland and thicket, shrubland and
and, in many cases, by reference to the original place
Mdis$a Lu ckow: rnell ni v rsity, llhaca, 1::.w York 1 e ls. 'inc· 11i ~ I al l rm; f disu·ibution discu ·sc I in th
of publication (especially where the date in ING grassland. Local terminology for particular vegetation
ig ~ 1 MaYt ·cl: 11iver:lly or Birmingham , J . ch~1pter o n k:gum ~ biogeogr:Jph ' ,· ·hrir el et!., tlus
conflicted with that given in other published works). types, especially in South America, is sometimes
Hir yoshJ hashi: Toho! u Univ "'rsity , J'IJ an. volum ) ar> und ·rpinn d I y these ph ylog · nies, we included in parentheses, e.g., semi-arid thorn scrub
It Toby Pennington: Roya l Bot~tni · ~mien, Edin! urg h have had LO Wk a s mewh·1t plu r.1listiC vie of iegum
Generic synonyms are given, but these are not (caatinga), is a subset of seasonally dry tropical
Roge r P lhill : Roya l Bo ta nic a rd ns, K w r -·lired) re lali nshlps In th -• bo k. TlP syst -'marl ·ally arrang ·cl
exhaustive, concentrating rather on those commonly bushland and thicket.
Lourdes Hico Ar ·e: Royal 13uwnic iard ns, K w u·ibal Lr :um •11ts that com prise lh , major pa1t o f thi
used in the legume literature during the past forty years
Jim Ross: Royal J3orn nj ,;miens, Victoria, Australia volume l:u g ·Jy fo ll ow more lr~1dili o n :t l !in •s of
(e.g., those given in Hutchinson, 1964; Allen & Allen, References to each genus are a rranged in chrono-
Dmitry Soko loff: Mose< w Sla t ' Univ · rs ily cb ssiflcalion. This is simply I ·c:aus mol .. ·ular sa mpling
1981 , and Polhill & Raven, 1981), Fo r a more detailed logical order. They range from papers treating the
,harl ·s SLirton: Nat.ionaJ Botan ic Ga rd e n o f Wa l ~ · of many gen ra rema Lns s<> poor thar we wer ·· unal le listing of synonyms see Gunn 0983). taxonomy of a few species to generic revisions and
(retired) y ' t LO fo rmally ·ir urns -rib · n w higher taxa. monographs, and papers dealing with the phylogeny
Ben-Erik Van Wyk: Rand Afrikaans University, South Th · 36 legume Lrihes arc d <Ill wil h in th , Ne~t the number of species in the genus is presented. of the genus. They also include , where appropriate,
Africa whi ·h they appcr1r in th · I ·gum · phyJog ·ny ~hts was based on a thorough re view of existing refere nce to a series of regional checklists (Lock, 1989;
Ea h tribal a ·ount in ludcs th .. aut ho r an I literature, consultation with experts and new counts of Lock & Simpson, 1991; Lock & Heald, 1994; Yakovlev
publication Jf th tribal nam and th main tribal
This v ilum • was urigin:illy dc:sign d Lo be :m illusuur >d taxa made from the herbarium collections at Kew. et al., 1996; Kumar & Sane, 2003; Lock & Ford, 2004)
synonyms . Th "S, cbw have I e n d1e ·I ·d using R v a l
en 'Y fopaedia f legume genel'<I Whi •h WOU id Sc1ve as Where ranges of species numbers are given in the published by Kew as part of its contribution to the
(200 and by ref ·r ·n · · to th e origi nal pl ~t · of gene ric treatments, spe cies totals for tribes are International Legume Database and Information Setvice
a suppl ··m ' nl t() th lo ng-ru nning rtdvcm es in J.egwne
publ ication of Lb m1111 >. Wh n ·onsid~ring m1 11Ps f
:ystemalics series PoU-1il! & Thwt:n, 1981; Stin o n, J 987· represented with the lowe r and upper limits in (ILDIS). All the references in the book are included in
suprag · n ri · taxa in Legum in sae, those o f Ber ·hw ld
Ile r ·ndee n o Dll ·h "r, 191 2; Sprt::nt & M Key, 1 9 ; parentheses separated by the average number of the bibliography on pages 511 - 544, where the overall
c' J.Pesl ( 182 ) have be n x ·lud ·c.l on th e advi ·e of species , e.g. (lOO) - 120 - (140). This has resulted in a
F ·rguson & Tuck r, 19 4; ,risp ' Doy I -. :I <)t '; · arrangement is alphabetical by first author, then
Marho lc.l , Kirsc hn ·r an<l , tepan ·k Turland, in
Pi ckersgill & Lo ·k !996; 1-leren 1 en & Bruneau, 20 ; freassess
. · ment o f t h e total number of species in the chronological in multiple works by a single author.
coJTe pon le n · w ith IU . Brummill al I cw, 5 April amity, which has risen from c 18 000 in 1994 to c
Crisp et al ., 2003; l litgmtrd & Bruneau, 2003). It Is also Two-authored works follow single authors and are
000). Tur.l a nd (l. c. sw tes: "lsu ·11 m11n s l probably 19 325 111
, , ' I ,
a t'O r\lP ndium f fa ·ts abOLil <.'ti ·h ·urre ntly re ·o •nis d th' this volume. This latter figure is the sum of arranged alphabetically by second author and
h:1v to he tak 11 a: o rders "rncl") with s m . or them e average totals given for each genus. subsequently in chronological order if the same two
legum• g ·nus ::111d a soun.:e b ok p >inting th e wny to
divided into famili ("c,l , d "J. According to Marhold ,l
mo r • in~ nnati m. Th ' volume do s no t !ndude textual authors have published more than once. Three or
al., wh ile "rad" mea1 rde r 'c led " t:aJ1 o nl mean Geographical d ·'tstrlb ution
. . ordered by continent
.
d ~scripllons of Lht: g •nc ra and th ··rt:: ~' r no keys t ts more-authored works are cited as 'First author et al.' in
family , hoth now ;,i n I in 1820". Tb s~ names thus have Ca
g ~ n •ra or trih •s: th I o k is thus not a full Genera grs normal!
. Y un Ic rs L o d) and then by country or the body of the text, and such works are arranged
no prio rity a t tribal level, .,g., fo r S I hor a ·', 'ytisene
leg11.min1 sannn; this ls for a future dale . n of l11 • ff< ~ps of ·ciumri ~s , whi ·h ·v r is th · most informative chronologically in the bibliography (regardless of
'arly JLI •slio ns was wh Lh ·r Lo organi (as Jitisea '), I alcn · a nd AsLrag:il '<le. Ph) .Ow ing I lol li s & Brummitt, 1992 . For Africa, number and order of names of the subsequent
The l110Sl r '(.' '!'1 l class lfi ·ati )11S or the l.cguminos::i ~
a l p h~1hcll ·ally o r systemalicalJ . Th ~ ed itor o nclud d Ytogltig rap hi ·a l r gions la rg ly f >llow the authors), with dates of publication highlighted in bold
tha t th ·hook sho uld represent the lat st 1111dernt~1ndlng a re thos of P lhlll "" Raven ll98ll a n IP >lhill 1994>.
Leaves bipinnate or pinnate (rarely Leaves mainly bipinnate and often Leaves 1-foliolate to once pinnate Anthers dehisce by longitudinal slits Anthers usually dehisce by 1-2 apical pores or a
simple or 1-foliolate) with specialised glands; Australian (a few palmate); some with tendrils; v-shaped slit
acacias have phyllodes only one rare species bi pinnate
?vary generally with a single carpel with 2 - many ovules Ovary of at least 2 united carpels with a single pendulous
in two alternating rows on a single parietal placenta ovule on an axile placenta in each of the 2 locules
Stamens (1-) 10 (-many); sometimes Stamens (3-) 10-many (sometimes Stamens (9-) 10-many
dimorphic or heteromorphic over 100); all the same (sometimes dimorphic) Style never bi lobed, although stigma sometimes complex Style bilobed with a receptive lobe and a hairy, sterile lobe
and hairy
Petals most showy part Stamens most showy part Petals most showy part
Fru it a legume dehlscing along upper and lower sutures, Fruit usually a loculicidal capsule (but several exceptions)
Compound pollen (polyads) common Pollen in single grains or a lornent breaking into single units, or drupa ceous, splitting into two 1-seeded valves
Compound pollen (polyads) rare
Se\lerat va riations on these gene ral typ es, some
Root nodules generally present lnctehlscent
Root nodules uncommon, but many Root nodules generally present
associations with fungi Seeds not hairy
Seeds often with stiff rigid hairs
2 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD INTRODUCTION 3
Nearly 500 legume genera (68%) are small, being segregated into several distinct ent1t1es, only one of
either monospecific or containing up to ten species. In which will continue to carry the tribal name Quillajaceae
total these ~1ccount for c. 1,592 (or 8%) of legume Sophoreae . We do not provide new tribal names for
~---------------- Polygalaceae
species. This compares with c. 231 larger genera these entities in the book, although the authors of the
1 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - Surianaceae
(containing 11 species or more) which account for c. tribe do use a series of informal clade names to denote
Fabales
17,735 (92%) of species in the family. These statistics groups of genera. \Xlhere st1pporl for Lriba1 segrga tion . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cercideae (page 57)
for the family are presented in Table 2 on page 3. is already robust tb e n > e bave followed this, e.g., the Detarieae sens. lat. (page 69)
It is now generally accepted that the Leguminosae Sesbanieae is reinstalecl as ·1 Lribe distin ·1 from the
Cassieae sens. lat. (Duparquetia; Dialiinae), page 111
is most closely related to Polygalaceae (Table 3), Robinieae (Lavin & Schrire, pages 452-453, this
Legumino sae Caesalpinieae sens. lat. (Umtiza clade), page 127
Surianaceae and Quillajaceae, which together form the volume) . Similarly, where there exists strong support
for lumping tribes wg ' Lh ' I' w have folio' ed this, ! - - -- - - - - - - - Cassieae sens. strict. (Chamaecrista, Senna, Cassia), page 112
order Fabales (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2003).
e.g. , Dall ergi :\ "' · e 11.'i . lat . here includes the Caesalpinieae p.p., incl. sens. strict. (page 129)
This revises the long-standing view that the family was
Adesmiea , the A s liynom ·ne;i and subtribe B1yinae Dinizio, Pentaclethra (page 165)
considered to be more closely related to the J
Connaraceae and Sa pindaceae (Dickison, 1981 ; of the Desmodieae (Klitgaard & Lavin, pages 307-335, Mimoseae sens. lat. (page 163) incl. Mimozygantheae (page 184)
l
fro m mnjor a Jvanc s in our un l e rs tanding of th
morphology an I d:1ssiflcati<>n of th family (Polhill ~
since Polhill (1994) 1 - - - - - - - - - - - Sophoreae p.p. (Myrospermum, etc.); Swartzieae p.p. [=Aldinoidclade]
Rav Jn, 1981; Polhill 199 ), as w ll as fr m more than The following is an update of the tribal and generic Dipterygeae (page 250)
t<::n yt::Lrs of inL ~ n. iv· molecu lar phylog n tic research classification of the family since 1994. The reader is also Sophoreae p.p. (Cladrastis, Styphnolobium, Pickeringia) , page 228
by severa l grmq1s or r ,~~1r b rs around Lh ·world. By referred to the complete updated generic synopsis on r - - - - - - - - - - Sophoreae p.p. (e.g. Calio); Swartzieae p.p. (Lecointeoid clade), page 216
r vealing that severa l or the \nforn ally m11n d g n ric pages 13 - 19 and Ll1e sysLenK1t\ · biogcogrnphy s ·ctioll !---------- Dalbergieae p.p. (Vataireoid clade), page 309; Sophoreae p.p. (Sweetia,
grt upin gs, l c.:gum~ rrib s, and v " 11 sul rainily of l.cguminosa in th second rx11t of tJ1 , I iog ography Luetze/burgia), page 228
,a s;tlpi ni i .lt.:He, as t:racHtionally cir: ·t1rn. cril "U, ·ire ·hapter (.' fo'ir ,, al., pages 1-5 , thb v lum . Each Sophoreae p.p. (Ormosia, Acosmium, Dip/otropis, etc.), page 228
n ) I mtluraJ groups, Lhc analy s hw ~ oflen re ulled trib -· i.n l he I ol has its own intr It 1cwry · 'cli n and r - - - - - - -- Brongniartieae (page 253)
50 Kb Inversion
in radl ·1tl r <.I finlti nor g ncri . an I tribal limits, and more detailed phylogeny relevant to that tribe - - - Sophoreae sens. strict. (page 228)
to the discovery of previously overlooked relationships (represent I in an abbreviated form as a diagram), but Euchresteae (page 260)
Genistoid clade
amongst taxa. Although it is too premature to recognise here we s ummarise the major generic realignments Thermopsideae (page 263)
all of these new groupings formally, the analyses do and tribal updates that have taken place since Polhill's Podalyrieae (page 267)
indicate a largely robust pattern of overall relationships (1994) classification and also indicate where major Crotalarieae (page 273)
in the family. For this introduction, we have therefore realignments are to be expected in the future. Genisteae (page 283)
constructed a family-wide supertree (Fig. 1) derived
from the latest analyses (cited in the legend to Fig. 1 Dalbergieae p.p. (Hymeno/obium, Andira), page 3o 9
and in the tribal accounts of this volume), with terminal Tribes in subfamily Caesalpinioideae Amorpheae (page 299)
taxa representing putatively monophyletic groups of Dalbergieae sens. lat. (incl. Adesmia, Da/bergia & Pterocarpus clades),
genera. The supertree also repr s nl. an important As in Polhill (1994), the Caesalpinioideae are divided Dalbergioid sens lat. clade page 307
facet of this volume - it is a 'snapshol' of our current into four tribes , the Cercicleae, Detarieae, Cassieae and Sophoreae p.p. (Baphioid clade), page 228
Dalbe rgioid clade
state of knowledge about relationships within these a sa lpinJ ac. Th ea rliest I ranching d . de i.n the ~--- Hypocalypteae (page 336)
putative monophyletic groups, set within the traditional I gum phylogeny (Fig. 1) is trib r ·id 'a in hich f--- - - Mirbelieae (page 339)
tribal context of the remaining chapters for ease of Polhill ( ·1 re ognised five gen ~ .i Jn two :-;ul trib . : Bossiaeeae (page 355)
Old World clade
cross-reference between the old and new placements Cercidinae and Bauhiniinae. In the account of the ~--- lndigofereae (page 361)
Cerci<leae by Lewis & Forest (pages 57-66, thi:;
of genera. Millettieae (page 367); Abreae (page 389); Phaseoleae p.p.
The order of the tribes presented in Legumes of the volume) t'> elve gener::1 are re ·ogn ised. Seven n·1111es,
._____ Phaseoleae sens. strict. (page 394); Desmodleae (page 433);
World follows this supertree of the family, starting pr · iou s ly con.s ider' d as gen ri · synonyms of
Psoraleeae (page 447)
with the more basally branching tribes ::incl working up Htmbfnia , are reinstated at g "n ' ric rank ba ·ed on
Sesbanieae (page 452); Loteae (page 455)
Lbrough th • le gume phylogeny by pr s nLing eac.b molecular and morphological data.
~-- Robinieae (page 467)
sl, t r g r up in turn. Where a tribe , as traditiona lly The Detarieae continues to comprise 82 genera
(Normcmdiodendron, described by ].Leonard in 199.'1 IR LC millettioids (Callerya, Wisteria, page 369), Galegeae sens. /at. (Glycyrrhiza)
circumscril d, is now kn wn to be no n-monoph.yleLic
was included in Polhill's synopsis as genus 1.4.8a l, Hologalegina Galegeae sens. lat. (Astragaleae), page 475
( >.g., th oplior ~1 "; l~e nnington et al., Lhis volume ,
it w.lll app ~:ir on th • su1 rt re mor Lilan o nce. The although four genera have been excluded since Polhill Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade (I RLC)
Hedysareae (page 489)
(1994) and four recently described genera added Cicereae (page 496); Galegeae sens. strict. (Ga/ego)
Suphcm:ae is thus repres nL cl on lhe tre hy some
(Mackinder, pages 69-108, this volume). The genus Trifolieae (page 499)
e ight differenl lineages Fig . ll , rn b ing Lh ·
Soph o r a • sens. strict. and the ot h r s v n being
Umtiza has been moved out of the Detarieae to the Fabeae (page 505)
km.~ ms of S >phorc..:ae sens. fut . LL is thu. •vidcm that Umtiza clade of tribe Caesalpinieae (Herendeen et al., FIG 1 Ph
penntngton
· Ylogeny
et al. (of Le~m I~osae corn piled as a supertree, based on analyses by Doyle et al. (2000); Crisp et al. (20oo); Wojciechowski et al. (20oo; 200 )'
th · tri l ·, allh ugh d all with in its traditional all-
2003a & b; Lewis, page 131, this volume).
are In bo(d type Pa20 oi),/<a11ta et al. (2001); Herendeen et al. (2003a); Luckow et al. (2003); Wojciechowski (2003). The 36 tribes dealt with in this volu~;
embracing sense in this hook, will ultimately be Pseudosindora is considered to be a synonym of · ge re erences are either to the beginning of the tribe or to the diagram of relationships following the introduction to that tribe
INTRODUCTION 5
4 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Copaifera, and Thy/acanthus, originally thought to be are: Coulteria, Erythrostemon, Guilandina, Lihidibia, Frt~ -, 1wri,t, /·tes/ K!rctlbizlct, Hydro b CJPll l e11cocblunm , (Kirkbride & Wiersema, 1997) and Trischidium,
a monospecific genus in Brazil, has proved to be based Mezoneuron , Poincianella, Pomaria, and Tara. The J ii iJ1fc •ria, P ·<?11dosm11em e t, and . 1j>bi11ga. In additio n, reinstated as a genus distinct from Bocoa (Ireland, this
on African material of julbernardia (Breteler, pers. tribe is currently paraphyletic with respe ct to the iwo oL11cr ge ne ra have b ·e n tl s Ti! ' d sin ce 1994: volume). Molecular data strongly suggest, however,
comm . in Mackinder, page 105, this volume). Cassieae sens. strict. and subfamily Mimosoide ae.
1tfllC'lill L. Rico & M ., o usa in Rk:o et ct!., 1 <t ) a n$1 that Swartzieae sens. strict. should be redefined to
Monopetalanthus has been disbanded (Wieringa, 1999) Within the tribe only one of the informal groups of V(~i tierm 11/:ms Villie rs in I u Pu y el al., 2002) a nd include only the genera Swartzia, Bobgunnia, Bocoa,
with species being redistributed to other genera in the Polhill 0994) remains unchange d with respect to
17; illc:11tc1dupsis has I l.:!n r instat.ed :1s :i dislin ·1 genus Candolleodendron, Trischidium, Cyathostegia, and
tribe, including the recently described Bikinia generic content, the monogeneric Pterogyne group. ( Lewis ~ Sc:brir _, 2003bl. bofinga, in ·lud "d ill th ~ Ateleia, with the other ten swartzioid genera requiring
(Wieringa, 1999). !curia was also described as new by Several new groups are referred to following Haston et tribe hy Politi II ( 1( ), is now cons idered a syno nym transfer to other tribes (Ireland, pages 215-224, this
Wieringa 0999), as was Ecuadendron by Neill 0998). al. (2003, submitted) . Of considerable biogeographical f C<!jo/Jo foll wing B;i rncl y & ·rim s ( I9 ;)7). Po UlilJ volume).
Micklethwaitia (Lewis & Schrire, 2004) is another interest is the Umtiza clade (Herendeen et al. , 2003b; 19911) rccogni s I no gen ·ri · grou in ' S wilhin the Polhill 0994) included 47 genera (Alexa was allotted
generic addition to the tribe. The genus is based on Lewis , page 129; Fig. 23 , this volume) which Ing ·1 and the phylogen >f Ll1 ' IJ'i l e r main poorl y number 3.2.12a) in his synopsis of the Sophoreae.
Cynometra carualhoi Harms, which was first given amalgamates seven genera previously positioned in r .-.olv ·<l d ue to a pau •ity or mo lct:UhLr data. L '\ is & Pennington et al. (this volume) reduce the number to
separate generic status as Brenaniodendron by three different tribes . Hi ·o (p;1ge 19'l, Lliis volume) pla ·em SL o f the gt:nc ra 45. Etaballia, lnocarpus and Riedeliella are removed
Leonard 0999a). Brenaniodendron is a later homonym into si. informal alliances foJlo win,' B;um:I y & rim s from the tribe and replaced in the Dalbergieae,
of Brenandendron in the Asteraceae and thus required Tribes in subfamily Mimosoideae L9lJ6, I' 7) an<l Lu cko el a.I. {2003). following Polhill Cl981d, but not 1994), Lavin et al.
a new name. The correct name for Bathiaea Drake is (2001a), and Klitgaard & Lavin (pages 307-335, this
Brandzeia Bail!. (Du Puy & Rabevohitra in Du Puy et The number of tribes in the Mimosoideae has been
Tribes in subfamily Papilionoideae volume). Ammothamnus is reinstated as a genus
al., 2002) . Phyllocarpus has changed name to reduced from five (Polhill, 1994) to four, with tribe distinct from Sophora. Pennington et al. continue to
Barnebydendron (Kirkbride, 1999b). The Detarieae is Parkieae h ing subsum >d inl the Mimoscac (J.u ckow, In the Papilionoideae numerous changes in generic recognise the genera Bowringia and Baphiastrum as
well-supported as a monophyletic group once Umtiza pag s 1 - J83, this o lum . Th n on ogi:neri · trib gro11p1ngs have t:i1 en place s in · 1994. Wh r separate from Leucomphalos, although Breteler 0994b)
is removed (Bruneau et al., 2000), but none of the Mim ozyga nth e::i Cr o nuna t , p ag ··. IR - 1 'i, thJ. e:illgnm •nts are stro ngl suppone I by molecu b r and considered the three to be congeneric. Further analysis
informal generic groupings of Polhill 0994) are volume) will a lso be lnduded in th Umosca in th t mhme I datasets aut.ho rs have •ffected these d1~ui ge is needed to resolve this issue . Baphiopsis in the
supported as strictly monophyletic and these are not near future (Luckow, page 163, this volume). Dinizia in their tribal treatments, and many genera have been Swartzieae has also been shown to belong in the
retained by Mackinder (pages 69-108, this volume). and Pentaclethra are among the most basally moved from one tribe to another. Within the subfamily, Baphioid clade of Sophoreae sens. lat. (Ireland et al.,
In 1994 the Cassieae comprised 20 genera in five br:.111 hing I me nls of th subfa mily and might w ell I e radical shifts in inter and intra-tribal relationships are 2000; Pennington et al., 2001). Polhill's 0981b, 1994)
subtribes. The tribe has long been known to contain an b •tter pJacecJ in Lh ~ Caesa lpirtio ideae, as first sugg sled indicated. Nevertheless, the majority of the tribes are still six informal generic groups are largely abandoned and
artificial grouping of genera which, pending further fo r Pentacl>thro I y Be nthRm 1875). Po lhill 199 ) defined in the more traditional sense of Polhill 0994) replaced with a series of informal clade names (e.g., the
molecular analysis, should be segregated into probably placed 36 genera in the Mimoseae. This has now with respect to the genera contained within them, Baphioid, Genistoid, Vataireoid, Aldinoid and
two to three separate tribes . It is dealt with largely in increased to 40 due to the addition of the two genera pending more robustly supported phylogenies. The Swartzieae sens. strict. clades) which, as indicated
its traditional sense by Lewis (pages 111-124, this from the Parkie ae , and two newly described genera: most striking example of a tribe which is polyphyletic earlier, shows the affinity of groups of Sophoreae sens.
volume) , and now comprises 21 genera. The Kanaloa 0994) and Alantsilodendron 0994). The in its traditional sense is the Sophoreae (Fig. 1), lat. genera to several different areas of the papilionoid
phylogenetic position of the enigmatic genus twelve informal generic groupings proposed by Lewis elements of which are scattered throughout the phylogeny (Fig. 1; Ireland, page 216, this volume;
Duparquetia remains equivocal and monogeneric tribal & Elias 0981) , and followed by Polhill 0994), remain papilionoid phylogeny, from the basally branching Pennington et al., page 228, this volume).
status would seem appropriate. The Cassieae sens. largely unchange d , although the Xylia group is groups which lack the 50 Kb inversion, i.e.: a) Alexa, The Dipterygeae (Barham, pages 250-251, this
strict. now contains only three genera: Cassia , Senna, disbanded and its two genera added to the Castanospermum, Angylocalyx and Xanthocercis, and volume) are unchanged from Polhill 0994), although
and Chamaecrista, and this group is more closely allied Ad nanth ' ra g r 1p. The Pentad · thra , IJ ipta I nhstrum b) Dussia and the group of Myrospermum, Myroxylon Lima (pers. comm.) suggests that the tribe might include
to the Caesalpinieae than to the other elements of und yli o llscus groups are ne w a klitio ns sin ·c 1994. and Myrocarpus associated with the Aldinoid clade of Monopteryx from the Sophoreae.
Cassieae sens. lat. The largest group of genera within Trih Mlmos ae ls paraphyle ti c ith rl.:!spe l 10 the the Swartzieae; to elements within the 50 Kb inversion
the Cassieae (in its broad sense) falls under the Acacieae and Ingeae and will need to undergo supra- clade, i.e.: c) a basally branching Cladrastis clade, cl) a
Genistoid clade
umbrella of subtribe Dialiinae which is expanded to generic restrU<.:turlng in the fULure. Calia-Uribea clade associated with the Lecointeoid clade
include subtribe Labicheinae, and now also includes With th g ·nus Fa itlberf;ta havi ng I een tran fe rred of the Swartzieae, e) a Sweetia-Luetzelburgia clade The most basally branching group of the Genistoid
the genus Poeppigia, transferred from the to t.he lnge~l e ( Po lhill, 1 94; Lu ·k w c>/ al., 200. , tribe associated with the Vataireoid clade, f) a basally clade (Fig. 1) comprises several genera of the
· Caesalpinieae. Uittienia, reinstated as a genus separate ·a ieae is c urr ' nil y mo n g Jn •ri ·, alth ug h the branching element within the Genistoid clade, g) a Sophoreae sens. lat. Sister to this group is a clacle
from Dialium (Rojo, 1982), is also included in this taxonomic status of the single genus Acacia is, as yet, more derived group within the genistoids comprising containing the next six tribes in the Papilionoideae,
generic grouping. Ceratonia is transferred from the unresolved. The genu s, in its traditi o na l Sophoreae sens. strict., and h) the Baphioid clade, sister together with the Sophoreae sens. strict. (discussed in
Cassieae to the Umtiza clade of the Caesalpinieae. certainly not monoph ylcti · and it is l b · ·p ·t I to a remaining clade of predominantly Old World tribes. its broader sense above). The Brongniartieae has
Tribe Caesalpinieae has increased from 47 (Polhill, that at least five gen - ra wiU be resurr 'Clc d o r new I The subfamily can be broadly di vid ed into the increased in genera from two to ten since 1994 when
1994) to 56 genera (Lewis, pages 127-161, this volume). described from within it. The speciose Acacia following ma111 · groups ( Fig. . 1): the , wa r1 z1eae
. sens. it only housed Brongniartia and Harpalyce. Polhill
Poeppigia is now excluded (see above) . Sclerolobium su bg •nus Pb,J llodi11.eae · mstILut s n wc ll s upported Slr/ ·~· · :in a$, ortcd group c f I a sa l papiUo n ids, the 0994) alluded to the work of Crisp & Weston 0987)
is considered to be a synonym of Tachigali, although grour nested within tribe fn~t'a >,as discusse I In mor • enistold l ttd~. th An lira gr >Li p th e /\111 rpbe·1 which proposed moving the Australian Templetonia
far from aU the necessary new combinations at species de ta il by l.c v is C raw J87, tlii s volum 1 and in rhe an . I Lht.: D·1• I l1 ' 1g
. 1. •t
, I Ia d " (.r I1e las
' t two toge t.h••r
group of tribe Bossiaeeae to the Brongniartieae, but he
level have been published in the latter. Cordeauxia is ch·q ler o n biog ·og r::t phy ( · ·hri1·e et. ed ., this vo l um >J: r •l ened l<> ,·1·s II 1e D a Ji. Jerg 101d . . se ll . fCJI . ·la d e
f (Jl!owing w · ,· h . was dissuaded from following their conclusions because
reinstated as a genus separate from Stuhlmannia , and A ctc.: ia s ubgenus Acacia is mo re I I re bl ti to 1
0 1c: 1 c ows ' ' e l a l. 200 and a n of the analysis of Chappill 0995). Ross & Crisp (pages
essenU·1II • •
Ceratonia and Umtiza are transferred into the tribe tribe Mimoseae . ·I· ' . Y Id Wo rld d adc (i n lu<ling th Bapltioicl 253-258, this volume) include the Templetonia group
1
from the Cassieae and Detarieae respectively. A major
change since 1994 is the recognition at generic rank of
The Ing a · has in r "asccl in numb ·r of gen ~r..1 fr 111
25 to 36 s in ·e 199 . Thi s brg ly restd ts fro m th
1 ;:~e, .Mtrl e li >id sens. lat. lad , Mill tti i I ·en '. la t.
.ind I f loga legi11·1
in the Brongniartieae, adding two genera recently
'I'I 1 • • . segregated from the genus Templetonia: Cristonia and
eight names resurrected from synonymy under treatme nt of Barn I> ~ rrirn s 19< 1) w hich d scribed In cn.~' l'i clw~1nzieac,
r 01 as traditionall y ' ir ' lll11 · 'fil ed Ins
• I <
Thinicola. Neotropical Poecilanthe and Cyclolobium
Caesalpinia, a genus which is now reduced from as n ew reinswtecl c r ~ l eva t d l( gen ·ri · staru • a row I 'lcldi '. r 15 to 17 g ne ra s in ·e 1994 lu ·· Lo L11 e are also transferred into the tribe from the Millettieae.
• l ton of n I . '
approximately 140 to 25 species. The reinstated genera of nine genera: Blanchetiodendron, Ebenopsis, <> ?l-1 1t11111c1 seg regm d fr >m • wa r1ztrr The monogeneric Euchresteae remains unchanged
6 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD INTRODUCTION 7
since 1994. It5 affinity lies with the Sophora group of the Dalhergieae (sensu Klitgaard & Lavin, pages 307- 335, •vid , 11 ·~ from mol c:ular J hylogenies. A traditional Desmodieae is most likely sister to Mucuna within the
core genistoids, most closely allied to Sophora (Kajita et this volume) is greatly increased in size to contain 49 t·lr ·umscr lplion o f th Millettieae is thus followed Phaseoleae sens. lat. (Fig. 47 of tribe Phaseoleae).
al., 2001). Euchresteae will thus have to be included genera, indllding the monogeneric tribe Adesmieae, hrire, p:1ge:; j67- 387, tMs volume) with 45 genera Ohashi (pages 433- 445, this volume) recognises
within a recircumscribed Sophoreae sens. strict., as tribe Aeschynorn •neae, and subtribe Bryinae of the in cluJed in ch • Lrihe Can increase of two on the three groups of genera within the tribe: the
suggested by Ohashi (pages 260-261, this volume). Desmodieae in synonymy, as well as the three genera Lre:1 101e nt:o of G >csi nk 11 :>84) and Polhill [1994]) . A Desmodium and Phyllodium groups (corresponding
The Thermopsideae, with six genera, also remains Riedeliella, Etaballia and Jnocaipus returned to the sJgnifi ·ant advan · l. th:1t rhe genera of the Millettieae to subtribe Desmodiinae in the synopsis of Polhill,
unchanged since 1994, although Wojciechowski et al. tribe from the Myroxylon group of tribe Sophoreae. :ire 110 kmg<::r nrr:rng ·ti alphabetically as they were in 1994) and the Lespedeza group (subtribe
(2004) find 100% bootstrap support for including The genus Belairia is treated as a synonym of Pictetia ihe sy n )psis of Po lhJll t1994), but are placed in a Lespedezinae, excluding Phylacium and Neocolletia).
Pickeringia within the Cladrastis-Styphnolobium clade. following Beyra Matos & Lavin (1999), and number ol' infonn·tl supr~1generic groupings. The The Psoraleeae retain the same nine genera as in
This transfer, however, has yet to be formally made. Arthrocarpum and Pachecoa are subsumed into gener<t G)1 ·/n/obiulll and Poecilanthe are transferred 1994. The tribe is nested within the Phaseoleae sens.
The Podalyrieae (Van Wyk, pages 267-271, this Chapmannia in line with the work of Thulin 0999). from the Mill ·tti ae to tribe Brongniartieae. Six genera lat., sister to Phaseoleae subtribe Glycininae.
volume) now includes tribe Liparieae (in large part) in Three new genera, Peltiera , Zygocarpum , and fr rn Q 1/! 'l~)ltl l( \ isteria w ill have to be transferred to
synonymy and the number or g n ra has grm n from Maraniona, described as new since 1994, are added to ::i ha ·:tl l I ran -bing r> >silion in the IRLC clade (Schrire, Holo9ale9ina
four to eight since 1994. Priesli ~)ltl Is clisl :ind •cl , Its the tribe . In Fig. 40 (page 309) of this volume the
Dalbergioid clade is further divided into three informal
ra " h
%9 • thi. olurn ·: Mi llettieae). Neodunnia and
•
p 011 gomia ·ire 110\· c nsidered as synonyms of This alliance of mainly Old World tribes contains two
species being redistribut ' U b e t w ~ n ll/Jtll'ia a nd
groups: the Adesmia, Pterocarpus and Dalbergia clades. Mllle1tic1, and \ i!/ardia is placed as a synonym of main clades: the Robinioid clade sister to the Inverted
Xiphotheca. Coelidium is placed in synonymy under
Lonchocarpus. The genera Paraderris, Paratephrosia, Repeat Lacking Clade.
Amphithalea. Stirlonanthus (Van Wyk & Schutte, 1995b)
is added as a new member of the tribe. Hypocalyptus Old World clade Philenoptera, Ptycholobium and Requienia are
is removed from this assemblage of genera and placed reinstated. Pyranthus and Sylvichadsia, two genera Robinioid clade
The remaining 17 papilionoid tribes group together in endemic to Madagascar, have been described as new
in its own monogeneric tribe in an, as yet, weakly The Sesbanieae (Lavin & Schrire, pages 452- 453, this
a large, predominantly Old World clacle which has the since 1994.
supported clade together with tribes Mirbelieae and volume) is resurrected as a separate monogeneric tribe,
Baphioid clade (comprising seven genera of tribe The monogeneric tribe Abreae is retained
Bossiaeeae. The Crotalarieae retains the same eleven distinct from the Robinieae. Sister to the Sesbanieae is
Sophoreae sens. lat.) as its most basally branching unchanged since 1994. Its phylogenetic position lies
genera as listed for the tribe in 1994, although Van Wyk tribe Loteae that has increased in number of genera
element. The 17 tribes cluster into three groups: the with the Millettieae sens. strict., together with two
et al. (1989), on the basis of biochemical evidence, from 17 to 22 since 1994. Acmispon, Hosackia,
Mirbelioid sens. lat. clade, the Millettioid sens. lat. clade, subtribes of Phaseoleae now excluded from tribe
suggest that Spartidium may be better placed in the Syrmatium and Tetragonolobus have all been
and the Hologalegina alliance. The latter is further Phaseoleae sens. lat.
Genisteae. The Genisteae, sister to the Crotalarieae, reinstated as segregate genera, although indications
divided into the Robinioid clade (with a large As for the Millettieae, the Phaseoleae (Schrire, pages
comprises the same 25 genera, but there is better are that Tetragonolobus should be subsumed, once
neotropical element) and the Inverted Repeat Lacking 393-430, this volume) is also treated largely according
understanding of inter-generic relationships within the again, into Lotus. Kebirita and Ottleya are new since
Clade (IRLC) . to the traditionally held view of the tribe, as
tribe (Polhill & Van Wyk, pages 283-296, this volume). 1994. Verm~(rux is now treated as a synonym of
The recent exciting rediscovery of the previously only recircumscribing Phaseoleae sens. strict. is currently
Mirbelioid sens. lat. clade Dorycnopsis. Sesbanieae and Loteae are together sister
once-collected genus Sellocharis (Miotto, pers. comm., very problematic. The Phaseoleae sens. lat. clade (Fig.
to the Robinieae. With Sesbania transferred to its own
2004), confirms the existence of this morphologically The Mirbelioid sens. lat. clade comprises the 47) includes two traditionally independent tribes, the
tribe, Poissonia reinstated as a genus distinct from
rather unusual taxon in Brazil. Further study will reveal Australasian Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae together with Desmodieae and Psoraleeae (both dealt with separately
Coursetia, and Hybosema placed as a synonym of
whether it is correctly placed in the Genisteae. the South African Hypocalypteae which is weakly in this volume). Polhill (1994) recognised 83 genera in
Gliricidia, the Robinieae now comprises 11 genera, a
eight suhtribes in the Phaseoleae. The number of
supported as a member of this clade in the matK decrease of one since 1994.
analysis of Wojciechowski et al. (2004). Hypocalyptus genera is increased to 89 here. Ramirezella is reinstated
Dalber9ioid sens. lat. clade (following Wojciechowski as distinct from Vigna, and Barbieria as distinct from
et al., 2004, Fig. 1) was misplaced in the genistoicl tribes and has been Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade (IRLC)
removed from the Liparieae (this is now part of an
Clitoria. Baukea is now treated as a synonym of
The weakly suppo1ted lineage sister to the above clade, expanded Podalyrieae in this volume) and placed in its Rhynchosia. Based on morphological, palynological The basally branching lineage of the IRLC (Fig. 1)
which includes tribes Amurpheae and the Dalbergioid and molecular evidence, Phylacium and Neocolletia are comprises a group of millettioid genera (including
own tribe Hypocalypteae (Schutte & Van Wyk, 1998b;
clade (sensu Lavin et al., 2001a), comprises two genera, transferred from subtribe Lespedezinae of trib e Callerya and Wisteria) sister to Glycyrrhiza of the
Van Wyk, pages 336-337, this volume). Polhill 0994)
. Andira and Hymenolobium. Pending further analysis, Desmodieae to subtribe Glycininae of the Phaseoleae . Galegeae (as traditionally circumscribed). Polhill 0994)
recognised 26 genera in the Mirbelieae, now reduced
these, together with Vatairea and Vataireopsis, are Three genera, Lackeya, Mysanthus and Oryxis have distinguished five subtribes in Galegeae (the Alhagiinae
to 25 (Crisp et al., pages 339-352, this volume). Three
dealt with by Klitgaard & Lavin (page 309, this volume) been described as n ew since 1994. Schrire (this DC. being added since his earlier classification [Polhill,
genera, Nemcia, Bracbysema anc\jansonia are placed
under a greatly enlarged concept of tribe Dalbergieae volume, Table 9, Fig. 47) places the genera of the 1981h]) and recognised Galegeae and Carmichaelieae
in synonymy under Gastrolobium; Stonesiella is new
sens. lat., although the authors clearly discount this Pl:aseoleae into two groups: Phaseoleae subtribes as distinct tribes. More recent studies suggest that
since 1994 and Otion, dealt with as a member of the
group of four genera from their cryptic Dalbergioid Diocleinae and Ophrestiinae allied to Millettieae sens. Carmichaelieae should be treated as an additional
tribe, remains to be validly published. The !30 ·sia eae
strict., and the Phaseoleae sens. lat. clade, comprising subtribe of Galegeae sens. lat., and this is followed
clade diagnosed by the synapomorphy of is reduced from ten genera to six due to th • Lr~tn · ~ r of
aeschynomenoid root nodules. Sister to the Dalbergioid subtribe Clitoriinae, tribes Desmodieae and Psoraleeae, here. In 1994 Galegeae and Carmichaelieae together
all four genera of the Templetonia group to the
clacle is tribe Amorpheae which comprises the same ancl the core-Phaseoleae. comprised 27 genera. In their account of Galegeae,
Brongniartieae.
eight genera as in 1994. These are grouped into two The Desmodieae now excludes subtribe Bryinae, including Carmichaelieae (Lock & Schrire, pages
clades, the Amorphoid clade and the Daleoid clade, ~~nsfrrred to the Dalbergieae sens. lat., and 475-487, this volume), the tribe contains 24 genera.
Millettioid sens. lat. clade
following McMahon & Hufford (2004), who also ylacium and Neocolletia moved to the Phaseoleae. Alhagi, Caragana, Calophaca, and Halimodendron
indicate that Psorodendron should be resurrected as a Basally branching in the Millettioid sens. lat. clade is Nevertheless, the tribe has increased in size since are transferred to tribe Hedysareae. Astracantha and
ninth genus in the tribe. The Dalbergieae sensu Polhill tribe Indigofereae that retains the same seven genera l 9~q · fro m 26 to 30 g n r~1. Th· gen ra Apby ll > 1111111 Neodielsia are returned to Astragalus, although,
as in 1994, although current evidence indicates WILh 0 icerma
· ·
111 synun my) , D >·111 0,liastr11m ,
(1994) comprised 17 genera divided between two conversely, Biserrula is reinstated as a distinct genus.
Hun~t I((
· , negnera,
u
groups, the Andira and Dalbergia groups. The Andira Vaughania must be subsumed within Indigo/era Mo11arthmcc11p11s ~ind Oug , ini&I Chordospartium, Corallospartium, and Notospartium,
group contained the same four genera (discussed (Schrire et al., 2003). The concept of what comprises are reinstated. Akschindlium Hylodesmum and considered distinct genera in 1994, are all placed as
Millettieae sens. strict. is changing rapidly based on Ohwia a1e
. new genera, added since
' 1994. The tribe synonyms of an expanded Carmichaelia. Erophaca
above) now partly referred to the Vataireoid clade. The
INTRODUCTION 11
In northern Europe species of G'leditsict, Lahurnu.m I er · nt;1gl' )r e ·situ. onserv::1 ti on prngr:1mme:;. complete synopsis of legume genera
and Robinia have been widely grown as street, p;.i rk Spe · ie:; of crtcitt, Ainule1zantbera , Da/IP rg la ,
J:,'1yt bri11 1, Prc1:ofJIS an I l'l ero e1rp11s arc al l importan t Legume genera, with page reference, arra nged systematica lly within tribes and subfamilies
and garden trees for centuries, and exotics, such as the
wi nter-flowering Australian acacias, are becoming very woody tr' , I g umi;:s i.n foreslly . L~gurn ' timber and
popular. A handful of species are sole.I as cut llo rs wood from many species has long been put to a
CAESALPINIOIDEAE 1.2.38 Maniltoa .......... ..... . ... 88
('florist's mimosa ' being, confusingly, the c )mmnn multitude of uses, ranging from he avy construction
1.2.39 Cynometra .. ...... .. ........ 89
name of a small number of Australian Acacia species). (house and boat building, railway sleepers and can CERCIDEAE
1.1 1.2.40 Tamarindus . ....... . .... , ... 90
Sw ' t p eas Latby ru.s s pec ies), lupins (l 11j i111ts wh eels), to paper and plywood m:mufacture, and fine
1.2.41 Intsia ....... . ..... ......... 90
sp · ' i s) :m I broo ms G°(mistct and y lisus species furnitu re production, ca rpentry, marquetry and veneer 1.1.1 Cercis .... ................. 59
u.2 Adenolobus .......... . ...... 59 1.2.42 Afzelia ........ , ... ...... . .. 91
have a ll h;td p ak:o; or rorn.tl ~1rity large ly based 011 work. Wooc.ls high in silica (e.g. , Dicorynia guianensis
Brodriguesia .. . . .. . . . ....... 92
rr
mu ltiple new ·ol Lil' fonns I' ·suiting )J1'l intcn iv Amshoff) are of particubr val u e in ma rine 1.1.3 Griffonia .. ..... ....... ..... 60 1.2.43
i.H !3renierea . . . . . . . . . .. .. ..... 60 1.2.44 Loesenera .......... ........ 92
hybridi z::it ion . All · >nlim1 Lo he~ p< pul ar gard n construction. Some species (e .g ., Kalappia celehica
u ."i Bauhinia . , ................. 61 1.2.45 Neocbevalierodendron ... .. .... 93
plnnts. In the tr pies, avenu ~sa nd pa 1·ks ~II"' In aria I ly Kosterm ., Dalhergia nigm (Veil.) Allem:lo ex Benth.)
lJ/1 Gigasipbon . ...... . ......... 62 1.2.46 Normandioc.lenclron .. ........ _ 93
adorn -· I wi th a represe ntation of /fJi.zia , as fa , are now considered rare and endangered because of
u .7 Tylosema ... ....... , ........ 63 1. 2.47 Zenkerella . . ...... . ....... _ . 93
Delonix, Senna, Castan o,\permum. and Tipu.ana. over-exp! italion due to their commercially valuable
1.1.8 Barklya ... ................. 64 1.2.48 Humboldtia . .. ..... ......... 94
Spectacular, showy-flowered species of Caesalpinia, timbers. Caesetlpinia echinata Lam. (brasil wooc.I or
1.1.9 Lysiphyllum ... . .......... . .. 64 1.2.49 Hymenostegia . ..... ...... _ .. 94
Calliandra, Mucu.na and Strongylodon have also pau brasil , the tree l'rom which the country Brazil took
l.},JI) Phanera ... .... . ........ . ... 65 1.2.50 Leonardoxa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 95
becom ~ pc pu lar in tropi. ·al gard ~ ns. In th sul trop ics its name) , once a sour· of an important red dye and
u. n Ltsiobema . . . . . . . . . ......... 66 1.2.51 Amherstia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 95
an l!ven grl!a L r vari ' l y f g n ra and sp i s hav • still the preferred wood for violin bows, has been
1.1.12 Piliostigma . ....... .......... 66 1.2.52 Ecuadendron ... . .. ...... .... 95
been introduc d into horli ulLur . ."orne f Lhes ',S U ·h reduced , by major habitat destruction, to a few
1. 2.53 Paloue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
as Acacia, Dichrostacbys, Leucaena , Mimosa an d p pularlorn; along the Atlanti · ·cast of Rt. zil .
1.2 DETARIEAE 1.2.54 Paloveopsis . . .. . ... ..... . , .. 96
Sesbania, have become weedy and invasive, having Th p •a, M n lei 's study organism b ·:im th· Cir:-;t
Neoapaloxylon ... ......... .. 72 1.2.55 Brachycylix . ....... . _ .... . .. 97
escaped th ·ir na tural pew; and diseases. lullipurpo. e m< d I s st ·m for quantirativ -• ge ne ti · and 1 gunie:-; 1.2. l
1.2.2 Schotia ......... .. , ........ 73 1.2.56 I-Ieterostemon . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . 97
trees and slirul s have long b en selected and r"fined ha ve I · -n 111 del organisms for many biol gi al studi •s
1. 2.3 Barnebyclendron ... _ ...... , .. 73 1.2.57 Elizabetba ........ ......... . 97
by loca l communlli s for s hade, ornament, l'orngc, throughout the 20th century (Van den Bosch & Stacey,
1.2.4 Goniorrhachis .... ......... . . 73 1.2.58 13rownea .. .. .... .......... . 98
fodder, fuelw<. o I, i)ee for:ig f r honey produ tiun , 2003) . Recently, new genetic and genomic tools have
Branclzeia ... .... ........... 74 1.2.59 13rowneopsis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
and soi l en ri ·hme nL. Reg i nal favourites includ e permitted an a ·celerated adva nc -' in our und •rst~nc.li ng 1.2."i
1.2.6 Oxystigma . . ..... . ........ .. 74 1.2.60 Macrolobium ..... ........... 99
Butea, Dalhergia ancl Millettia in India; Callicmdra, of legume biolof.'Y· Major \ o rk on positional doning
1.2.7 Kingioclendron . . . , .......... 75 1.2.61 Paramacrolobium . .. ......... 100
Gliricidia, Inga and Lettc&Wl'/Ct in Central America of I gu mc genes is being und rtaken >n Metlicago
1.2.8 Gossweileroclenclron ..... _ ... , 75 1.2.62 Cryptosepalum ..... ......... 100
(Polhill, 1997) and Faidher/Jia and Acacia in Africa. tn111cau t!o. <1e1t11. , Lo/us jc1pon.ic11s (Reg I) l .Lars n
1.2.9 Prioria .......... ... __ ...... 75 1.2.63 Dicymbe ..... ... . ..... . _ .. 101
Some are grown as impenetrable spiny hedges, living and Glycine max.
1.2.10 Colophospermurn .......... .. 76 1.2.64 Polystemonanthus .. . , .... . _ . 101
fence- lines and windbreaks. In the 1980s and 1990s a Further details of current and potential uses of
1.2.1 l Hardwickia ...... . ....... ... 76 1.2.65 Pseudomacrolobium . ......... 102
number o f seed banks ta rgeted multipurpose I ~gum ~s can be found in the economic notes which
1.2.12 Daniellia ... ... .. .. . . . ...... 77 1.2.66 Englerodendron . , .. .. .. .. ... 102
leguminous trees fo r introduction as trial species in for m part of the textural block of each genus in this
u.n Eurypetalum .... . ... . ....... 77 1.2.67 Anthonotha ....... ......... 102
agrofo rest ry syste ms and legumes form a large volume.
1.2.14 Eperua ... . .. ... .. . ........ 78 1.2.68 13erlinia . . ........ ......... 103
1.2.15 Augouarc.lia ...... ..•........ 79 1. 2.69 Librevillea . ... .. .. .. .... .. . 103
1.2. 16 Stemonocole us .. . .. ... ... . .. 79 1.2.70 Didelotia ......... .. _ . ... .. 103
1.2.17 Peltogyne ....... ........... 79 1.2.71 Pellegriniodenclron , . . . ....•.. 104
1.2.18 Hymenaea ....... ........... 80 1.2.72 Gilbertiodendron ... ......... 104
1.2.19 Guibourtia . ...... ..... , . , ... 81 1.2.73 Isoberlinia ... ... .. .. . ...... 104
1.2.20 Hylodendron . . .. . ........... 82 1.2.74 Ockloniodenclron .. . . .. . , ... . 105
1.2.2 l Gilletiodenclron .... ...... .... 82 1. 2.75 Microherlinia . ..... ......... 105
1.2.22 Baikiaea . ....... ... ........ 82 1. 2.76 Julbernarclia .... . . . .. .. ..... 105
l.2.2j Tessma nnia .............. . , . 83 1.2.77 Brachystegia , . . ... ......... 106
1.2.2 1! Sindora ....... ...... _ ...... 83 1.2.78 Tetraherlinia ... . .... , ...... 106
1.2.25 Sincloropsis .. , . .. ..... , , , . .. 83 1.2.79 Bikinia ... .. .. ..... ....... _ 107
1.2.26 Copaifera . . . , . . . . .......... 84 1.2.80 Icuria ..... . ...... ......... 107
1.2.27 Detarium ...... . . ........... 84 1.2.81 Aphanocalyx ...... ......... 108
1.2.28 Enclertia . . . . . . . . ........... 85 1.2.82 Michelsonia .... .. .. ..... 108
1.2.29 Lysidice ... . .. ... ........... 85
1.2.30 Saraca .. ..... . .. ........... 85 1. 3 CASSIEAE
1.2.31 Leucostegane .. ... ...... . ... . 86 1.3. l Duparquetia ... ............. 11 3
l.2.j2 Talbotiella . ...... . .... _ ... _ . 86 1.3.2 Poeppigia .... ..... . ....... 11 3
1.2,53 Scoroclophloeus . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 86 1.3.3 Baudouin0 ... ..... _ .. . .. , . 114
1.2,34 Cruclia .. .. ...... ........... 87 1.3.4 Eligmocarpus . .. _ ... ........ 11 4
1.2,35 Lebrunioclendron .. ... ........ 87 1.3.5 Mendoravia . . ... ... . . ... _ .. 115
1.2.36 Plagiosiphon ..... . . .. ....... 88 1. 3.6 Distemonanthus ............. 115
1.2.37 Micklethwaitia . ... .. . _ . .... . . 88 1.3.7 Apuleia .. . .. .............. 115
INTRODUCTION 13
12 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
In northern Europe species of Gleclitsia, Letlntrnwn p erce ntage of ex situ conservation programmes. complete synopsis of legume genera
ancl Robinia have been widely grown as street, park Species of Acacia, Anade1zanthera , Dalbergia,
ancl garden trees for centuries, ancl exotics, such as the Eiythrina, Prosopis and Pterocmpus are all important Legume genera, with page refe rence, arranged systematically within tribes ancl subfamilies
winter-flowering Australian acacias, are becoming very woody tree legumes in forestry. Legume timber ancl
porular. A handful of species are sold as cut flowers wood from many species bas long been put to a
multitude of uses , ranging from heavy construction CAESALPINIOIDEAE 1.2.38 Maniltoa ......... ... . ...... 88
('florist's mimosa' being, confusingly, the common 1.
(ho use and boat building, railway sleepers and earl 1.2.39 Cynometra ..... . .. .......... 89
name of a small number of Australian Acacia species) .
1.1 CERCIDEAE 1.2.40 Tamarindus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O
Sweet peas (Latbyrus species), lupins (Lupinus wheels), to paper and plywoocl manufacture , and fine
furniture production, carpentry, marquet1y and veneer 1.1.l Cercis ... ......... ... . ..... 59 1.2.41 Intsia .......... . . .......... t O
species) and brooms (Genista and Cytis11s species)
work. Woods high in silica (e .g., Dicorynia guianensis 1.1.2 Adenolohus .. . . . ... ......... 59 1.2.42 Afzelia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J
ha ve all had peaks of popularity largely basecl on
Amshoff) are of particular value in marine 1.lJ Griffonia . . .... .... ......... 60 1.2.43 Broclriguesia . . . . . . . . . . . .... 9
multiple new colour forms resulting from intensive
construction. Some species (e.g., Kalappia celehiw 1.1.4 Brenierea ...... . .. ..... . . .. 60 1.2.44 Loesenera . . . . . . . . . ..•..... 92
hybridization. All continue to be popular garden
Kosterm., Dalhergia nigra (Veil.) Allemao ex Benth.l 1.1.'i Bauhinia .......... ......... 61 1.2.45 Neochevalierodenclron ..... ... . 9.
plants. In the tropics, avenues and parks are invariably
are now considered rare and endangered because of 1.1.6 Gigasiphon ........ . . ... .. . . 62 1.2.46 Normandiodenc.lron .. .. . •.. . .. 93
adorned with a representation of Alhizia, Cassia,
over-exploitation clue to their commercially valuable 1.1.7 Tylosema .... .. .... . . .•..... 63 1.2.47 Zenkerella ......... .. . ...... 93
Delonix, Senna, Castanospermum and 1'ipuana.
timbers . Caesa!pinia ecbinata Lam. (brasil wood or 1.1.8 Barklya ........... ... .. .. . . 64 1.2.48 Humboldtia ...... . . .....• . .. 9
Srectacular, showy-flowered species of Caesalpinia,
Calhandra, Muczma and Strongylodon have also pau brasil, the tree from which the count1y Brazil took 1.1.9 Lysiphyllum .... . . . . ...... ... 64 1.2.49 Hymenostegia .... . . .....•... 94
its name), once a source of an important red dye ancl 1.1.10 Phanera ........... ......... 65 1. 2.50 Leonardoxa . .... . .. .... .. ... 95
become popular in tropical gardens. In the subtropics
still the preferred wood for violin bows , has been 1.1.1 1 Lasiobema .. ... .. .. ......... 66 1.2.51 Amherstia ..... . . .. ......... 9
an even greater variety of genera and species have
redu ced, by major habit::it d est ru ct ion, to a few 1.1.12 Piliostigma .... . . .. . ......... 66 1.2.52 Ecuaclendron ....... . ..... ... 95
been introduced into horticulture . Some of these, such
populations along the Atlantic coast of Brazil. 1.2.53 Paloue ............ .... . •. . . 96
as Acacia, Dic/Jrostacbys, Leucaena , Mimosa and
The pea, Mendel's study organism, became the first 1.2 DETARIEAE 1.2.54 Paloveopsis ........ . . .. . . . .. 96
Sesbania, have become weedy and invasive, having
model system for quantitative genetics and legumes 1.2. l Neoapaloxylon ... ...... . . . .. 72 1.2.55 Brachycylix ...... . . ..... . ... 97
escaped their natural pests and diseases. Multipurpose
have been model organisms for many biological studies 1.2.2 Schotia ......... ........ . .. 73 1.2.56 Heterostemon ...... . . ....... 97
trees and shrubs have long been selected and refined
throughout the 20th century (Van den Bosch & Stacey, 1.2J Barnebydendron .. . . ....... . . 73 1.2.57 Elizabetha ....... . . .... .. ... 97
by local communities for shade, ornament, forage,
2003). Recently, new genetic and genomic tools have 1.2.lt Goniorrhachis .... ........... 73 1.2.58 Brownea .......... ....... . . 9
fodder, fuelwood, bee forage for honey production,
permitted an accelerated advance in our understanding 1.2.'i Brandzeia ..... ............. 74 1.2.59 Browneopsis ....... ...... . .. ;>8
and soil enrichment. Regional favourites include
of legume biology. Major work on positional cloning 1.2.6 Oxystigma ...... ............ 74 1.2.60 Macrolobium .... . . . ........ . 99
Butea, Dalbergia and Millettia in India ; Calliandra,
of legume genes is being und e rtaken on Medicago 1.2.7 Kingiodendron ... .... . ...... 75 1.2.61 Paramacrolobium . . . ..... . . . 10
Gliricidia, Inga and Leucaena in Centra l America
tntncatula Gaertn., Lotus japonicus (Regel) K.Larsen 1.2.8 Gossweileroclenc.lron .......... 75 1.2.62 C1yptosepalu111 ..... ....... . . 10
(Polhill, 1997) and Faidberhia ancl Acacia in Africa.
and Glycine max. 1.2.9 Prioria ....... . .. ........... 75 1.2.63 Dicymbe ......... .. . .... . . IOI
Some are grown as impenetrabl e spiny heclges, living
Further details of current and potential uses of 1.2.11) Colophospennum . . . .. . .. ... . 76 1.2.64 Polystemonanthus . . ......... 10 1
fence-lines ancl windbreaks. In the 1980s ancl 1990s a
legumes can be found in the economic notes which J .2.1 L Hardwickia ...... ........... 76 1.2.65 Pseudomacrolobium . ....... . . 1 2
numb e r of seed banks targeted multipurpose
form part of the textural block of each genus in this 1. 2.12 Daniellia . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . .. 77 1.2.66 Englerodenclron .... .. . ... . . . 102
leguminous trees for introduction as trial species in
volume. 1.2.13 Eu1ypetalum .... ............ 77 1.2.67 Anthonotha ........ .. . ..... 102
agroforestry systems and legum es form a large
1.2.1 4 Eperua ......... ...... . .... 78 1.2.68 Berlinia .... . .... . ... . ..... I 03
1.2 .1 'i Augouardia ...... ........... 79 1.2.69 Librevillea ........ ......... l03
1.2. H> Stemonocoleus ... ........... 79 1. 2.70 Diclelotia ......... ......... lO
1.2.17 Peltogyne . . . . . . . . .......... 79 1.2.71 Pellegriniodenclron . . ......... 10'1
1.2. 18 Hymenaea ....... ........... 80 1.2.72 Gilbertioc.lenc.lron . . . ..... . .. . JO
1.2. l 'J Guibourtia ....... ........... 81 1.2.73 Isoberlinia ........ ... . ..... 10
1.2.20 Hylodenclron . . . ........ . .. 82 1.2.74 Oddonioclendron . . . .... . . . . 105
1.2.2 L Gilletiodendron ... ... . .... . . . 82 1.2.75 Microberlinia ...... .. , ... ... 105
1.2.22 Baikiaea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 82 1.2.76 Julbernardia ....... . .. .. . . .. I O"i
1.2.23 Tessmannia ..... . ... .. . . .. .. 83 1.2.77 Brachystegia . . ... ..... .. .. l.06
1.2.24 Sinclora ......... ........... 83 1.2.78 Tetraberlinia .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . 106
l.2.2'i Sincloropsis . . . . . . .... . . . ... . 83 1.2.79 Bikinia .. .. .. ... .. ......... 107
1.2.26 Copaifera ........ .......... 84 1.2.80 lcuria ........ . .. .... . .. , .. LC 7
1.2.27 Detarium . . . . . . . . . .... . ..... 84 1.2.81 Aphanocalyx .. .. .. .. , . , .... 108
1.2.28 Endertia . ... ... . ........... 85 1.2.82 Michelsonia . ...... ..... . ... 108
1.2.2') Lysiclice .. . .. . . . . ........... 85
1.2.3() Saraca .......... ........... 8'i 1. 3 CASSIEAE
1.2.3 L Leucostegane . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 86 1.3.1 Duparquetia .. .............. 113
1.2.32 Talbotiella . . . . . . . . , . . . ...... 86 1. 3.2 Poeppigia ... .............. 113
1.2,33 Scorodophloeus ... ........... 86 1.3.3 Baudouinia .. ......... , . ... 114
1.2.:'>4 Cruclia .......... ........... 87 1.3.4 Eligmocarpus . ........... . .. 114
1.2.3c; Lebruniodendron . . ......... . . 87 1. 3. 5 Mencloravia .. .............. 11 'i
1.2.36 Plagiosiphon . . . ....... . ... 88 1. 3.6 Distemonanthus ......... . ... 11 'i
1.2.37 Micklethwaitia . . . . . .. . ....... 88 1.3.7 Apuleia ..... .............. 115
INTRODUCTION 13
12 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
1.3.8 Storckiella . . . ....... . ...... 116 1.4.44 Lemuropisum ... ...... . ..... 156 MIMOZYGANTHEAE 3.1.11 Aldina ..... .. ..... . ....... 221
Labichea .... ....... . ... ... 117 Pachyelasma . .. ... ......... 156 2.2.
1.3.9 1.4.45 Mimozyganthus .... ......... 185 3.1.12 Zollernia .. .. . ..... . . . ..... 222
1.3.10 Petalostylis . .. . . . . ....... ... 117 1.4.46 Erythrophleum . ....... . ... .. 157 2.2.1
3.1.13 Holocalyx .... .. . .... , .. ... 222
1.3.11 Koompassia . .. .......... ... 117 1. 4.47 Dimorphandra . .. .. . . . ...... 157 3.1.14 Lecointea .. . ... ............ 223
2.3 ACACIEAE
1.3.12 Martiodendron ...... .. ..... . 118 1.4.48 Mora . .. . .. .. .. ........... 158 3.1.15 Harleyodenclron .. .. ......... 223
1.3.13 Androcalymma ....... . .... . . 118 1.4.49 Burkea ... . . .. ............ 158 2.3.l Acacia .. .... .. .. . . . . . .... . 188
3.1.16 Exostyles ... . . ..... ..... . .. 224
1.3.14 Kalappia . . . . .......... . . .. 119 1.4.50 Stachyothyrsus .. ....... . . ... 159 3.1.17 Baphiopsis .. .. .. .... , ..... _ 224
1.3.15 Zenia .... . .. ............ . . 119 1.4.51 Sympetalandra . .. .. ... ..... . 159 2.4 INGEAE
1.3.16 Uittienia . . . . . ........... .. . 119 1.4.52 Campsiandra .. .... . ... . .... 159 2.4.l Faidherbia . . . . . ... ......... 196 3.2 SOPHOREAE
1.3.17 Dialium .. ... ...... ... . .. . . 120 1.4.53 Chidlowia . ... .. . .......... 160 2.4.2 Zapoteca ... . . ... .......... 196
Guinetia .. .. . . . .......... . 197 3.2.1 Alexa . . ..... . . . . .. ........ 229
1.3.18 Dicorynia ... . ....... . .... . . 121 1.4.54 Diptychandra .. .. .. .... .. ... 160 2.4.3
Calliandra . .. . . . . ... .. . .... 197 3.2.2 Castanospermum .. . ..... . ... 229
1.3. 19 Chamaecrista . . . . . . ..... . ... 122 1.4.55 Orphanodendron .......... .. 161 2.4.4
Viguieranthus . . . . . ...... . ... 199 3.2.3 Angylocalyx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
1.3.20 Senna . ... . . ... ...... . .. . . 123 1.4.56 Vouacapoua . .. .... .. ....... 161 2.4.5
Macrosamanea . .. .... . ...... 199 3.2.4 Xanthocercis . . . . . . ... . .... . 230
1.3.21 Cassia ..... ........ . ... . .. 124 2.4.6
Cojoba ... . ... ... ... . .. .... 199 3.2.5 Dussia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
2.4.7
Inga .. . ... . . . . .... . ...... 200 3.2.6 Myrocarpus ... . . .. .. ..... .. 231
1.4 CAESALPINIEAE 2. MIMOSOIDEAE 2.4.8
Cedrelinga . . .... ......... . . 201 3.2.7 Myroxylon . . . . . . . . . .. ...... 232
1.4.1 Gymnocladus . . . .......... . . 130 2.4.9
2.1 MIMOSEAE Zygia .. . . .... .. ........... 201 3.2.8 Myrospermum . .......... . .. 232
1.4.2 Gleditsia . . . .. . .... . ..... . . 130 2.4.10
Marmaroxylon .. .. .......... 201 3.2.9 Monopteryx . .. ........ .. ... 232
1.4.3 Umtiza .. . . .. . .. . ... . ...... 131 2.1.1 Dinizia . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 2.4.11
Archiclendron . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 202 3.2.10 Claclrastis . .. . . ...... .. ... . . 233
1.4.4 Tetrapterocarpon .......... . . 132 2.1.2 Pentaclethra ... .. ...... . .. 166 2.4.12
Falcataria . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . 202 3.2.11 Styphnolobium . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
1.4.5 Arcoa .... . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. 132 2.1.3 Aubrevillea . . . . ........ .. . 166 2.4.13
Serianthes . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... 202 3.2.12 Calia . .. . .... ... ...... .... 233
1.4.6 Acrocarpus ...... . . . .... .. . 133 2.1.4 Adenanthera . . . .. ..... ... 167 2.4.14
Paraserianthes . . . . . . . ... .... 203 3.2.13 Uribea .. . ... . ...... . . .. . . . 234
1.4.7 Ceratonia ... . . ..... ... ... .. 133 2.1.5 Tetrapleura . . ............ 167 2.4.15
Archidendropsis .. .... , ..... . 203 3.2.14 Sweetia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
1.4.8 Pterogyne . . .. ........... . . 134 2.1.6 Amblygonocarpus . . . . .. . ... 167 2.4.16
Wallaceodendron . . .......... 204 3.2.15 Luetzelburgia . . . . . . . .. , . . . . . 234
1.4.9 Haematoxylum ..... . ....... 135 2.1.7 Pseudoprosopis ..... . . . . ... 168 2.4.17
2.4.18 Pararchidendron . . . ........ . 204 3.2.16 Ormosia ... . . .. ... .... ... . 235
1.4.10 Cordeauxia . .. .... . ... ... .. 135 2.1.8 Calpocalyx .. . . . . , .......... 168
2.4.19 Hyclrochorea . .. . . . ......... 204 3.2.17 Haplormosia ... ............ 235
1.4. 11 Stuhlmannia . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 136 2.1.9 Xylia . . . . . ... . .. .. . . . . 168
2.4.20 Abarema . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... 205 3.2.18 Pericopsis . . .. . , .... .... ... 236
1.4.12 Mezoneuron .. ... , , ... .. . .. 136 2.1.10 Piptadeniastrum ..... ..... .. 169
2.4.21 Blanchetioclendron .. . ........ 205 3.2.19 Acosmium . . . . . . . . . . ....... 236
1.4.13 Pterolobium . .. ........ , . . .. 137 2.1.11 Entada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 169
2.4.22 Leucochloron . . . . . ... . ...... 206 3.2.20 Bowdichia . .. . . . ........... 237
1.4.14 Tara . .. . . ... . .. .......... . 138 2.1.12 Elephantorrhiza . . . . . . . . . . . 170
2.4.23 Chloroleucon .. . . ......... .. 206 3.2.21 Diplotropis ... ... . ... .. ... . 237
1.4.15 Coulteria ... . ... ...... .... . 139 2.1.13 Plathymenia . . . . . . . . ...... . . 170
2.4.24 Cathormion . . . . . . . . . ..... .. 207 3.2.22 Clathrotropis ... ... . ........ 238
1.4.16 Caesalpinia ... .... . ........ 140 2.1.14 Indopiptadenia . . . . . . . . . . . 170
2.4.25 Thailentadopsis . . ........... 207 3.2 .23 Petaladenium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
1.4.17 Pomaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 2.1.15 Lemurodendron . . . . . . , .. .... 171
2.4.26 Sphinga . . .. . ... ........... 207 3.2.24 Sakoana ~ .. . . . . ........... 238
1.4.18 Erythrostemon . ......... . . . . 141 2.1.16 Newtonia . . .... . ..... 171
2.4.27 Havardia . . . . . . . . . ........ . 208 3.2.25 Neoharmsia ... ... .. .. ... . .. 239
1.4.19 Poincianella . . . . . . . ......... 142 2.1.17 Fillaeopsis . . ..... . ...... 171
2.4.28 Ebenopsis . . . . . . . . . . . ...... 208 3.2.26 Bolusanthus .. . ....... . .... . 239
1.4.20 Cenostigma ... .. , .... .... .. 142 2.1.18 Cylicodiscus ... . ........ 172
2.4.29 Painteria . . . . . . . . . . ........ 208 3.2.27 Platycelyphium ............. 240
1.4.21 Guilandina ... . ............. 143 2.1.19 Prosopis . . . . . . . . ...... . 172
2.4.30 Pithecellobium . . . ........... 209 3.2.28 Dicraeopetalum ....... ... . .. 240
1.4.22 Libidibia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 144 2.1.20 Xerocladia ......... ... 173
2.4.31 Hesperalbizia . ... ........... 210 3.2.29 Cadia .. .. .. . . .... ... .. . . .. 241
1.4.23 Stahlia .. .. .. . . ............ 145 2.1.21 Prosopidastrum . . . . ........ 173
2.4.32 Pseudosamanea .. .... . ...... 210 3.2.30 Ammodendron . .......... , .. 242
1.4.24 Hoffmannseggia . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 2.1.22 Piptadeniopsis . .......... .. 173
2.4.33 Samanea . . . . . . . . . ... ..... . 210 3.2.31 Ammothamnus . ....... . .. ... 242
1.4.25 Stenodrepanum . . . .. ... ..... 146 2.1.23 Neptunia . . . . . .. ..... . ... 174
2.4.34 Albizia .. .. .. . .. ........... 211 3.2.32 Maackia .. . . .. ........ .. . .. 242
1.4.26 Zuccagnia . . . . . . ........... 146 2.1.24 Leucaena . . . ............ 174
2.4.35 Enterolobium .. . . ........... 212 3. 2.33 Sophora . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 243
. 1.4.27 Lophocarpinia . . .. .. . . ...... 146 2.1.25 Schleinitzia .. . .. ........ ... 175
2.4.36 Lysiloma . ... . . . ........... 212 3.2.34 Salweenia . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 244
1.4.28 Balsamocarpon ... . ......... 147 2.1.26 Desmanthus . . . . . . , . . . .. 175
3.2 .35 Camoensia . .. . .. .. . ...... .. 245
1.4.29 Moullava .. . .. . . ..... ... . .. 147 2.1.27 Kanaloa . ... . . . ...... 176
3.2.36 Dalhousiea . . . ......•...... 245
1.4.30 Batesia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 2.1.28 Calliandropsis . . . . . . . . . . .. . 176
2.1.29 Gagnebina . .... ... .... . 176 3. PAPILIONOIDEAE 3.2.37 Airyantha ... . . ...... . . . .... 245
1.4.31 Recordoxylon . . . . ... . ...... 148 3. 2.38 Leucomphalos . ............. 246
1.4.32 Melanoxylon . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 148 2.1.30 Dichrostachys . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 3.1. SWARTZIEAE 3.2.39 Bowringia . . . . . . . . . . . ...... 246
1.4.33 Moldenhawera . ..... .. . . .. .. 149 2.1.31 Alantsilodendron . . . . . , ... .. 177
3.1.1 Bobgunnia . ... . .. .......... 217 3.2.40 Baphia .... . .. ......... .. .. 246
1.4.34 Tachigali . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 2.1.32 Parkia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
3.1 .3 Bocoa ......... . ... . . ..... 217 3.2.41 Baphiastrum .. ............ . 247
1.4.35 Arapatiella . . . . .. . .. .. ... . .. 151 2.1 .33 Anadenanthera . . .. . .... . . . 179
3.1.2 Swartzia . . . .. .. .. .......... 218 3.2 .42 Amphimas ... . .. , ......... . 247
1.4.36 Jacqueshuberia .. . ..... . ... . 151 2.1.34 Pseudopiptadenia .......... . 179
3.1.4 Candolleodendron . ..... ..... 219 3.2 .43 Panurea . . .... ... .. . . . ... . . 248
1.4.37 Schizolobium . .. .... ....... . 151 2.1.35 Piptadenia ... ......... , . 180
3.1.5 Trischidium . .. . . . ..... . . . . . 219 3.2.44 Spirotropis . . . . ....... .... .. 248
1.4.38 Bussea . .. . .. .... ... , . .. . . . 152 2.1.36 Parapiptadenia . . . . . . . . . . . 181
3.1.6 Cyathostegia .... .. ......... 219 3.2.45 Uleanthus .... . . .. ... , .. .. . 248
1.4.39 Pelto phorum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 2.1.37 Microlobius . . . ...... . ..... 181
3.1,7 Ateleia . .. ..... . . . .. ....... 220
1.4.40 Parkinsonia .. . ..... .... ... . 153 2.1.38 Stryphnodendron . . . . . ... . . 182
3.Ls Amburana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 3.3 DIPTERYGEAE
1.4.41 Conzatt~ .. .. . . .... ..... .. . 154 2.1.39 Adenopodia . . .. .. . . ... . . . 182
3.1.9 Mildbraediodendron . . . . . . . . . . 220 3.3.l Taralea ... ... .......... . .. 251
1.4.42 Delo nix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 2.1.40 Mimosa ... . . ......... . 183
3.1.10 Cordyla . .. . .. . .. . . ... . .... 221 3.3.2 Pteroclon .. . . ..... . .. . ... .. 251
1.4.43 Colvillea .. ... ..... . . . .. .. . 155
3.3.3 Dipteryx .... ........ . . .... 251
14 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD INTRODUCTION 15
BRONGNIARTIEAE 3.9.11 Petteria ....... ............ 290 ;_ Grazieln Ien iron ............ 326 3.15 INDIGOFEREAE
3.4 3 11 ...
3.9.12 Laburnum ..... .......... . . 291 · 1. 33 L)a lb rgi~1 .. . ... , ........... 327 3.15.1 362
3.4.1
3.4.2
Cyclolobium .... ........ . .. 254
Poecilanthe . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 254 3.9.13
3.9.14
Podocytisus .... .. . ...... ... 291
Hesperolaburnum .. . .... .... 292
;:u.3 '
1
Macha riu m . .... ........... 328
?i.ll .35 A ;-;d1yn mene .... ......... 329
3.15.2
3.15.3
Phylloxylon ...
Cyamopsis ....
Indigastrum ...
.............
.............
.............
362
362
3.4.3 Harpalyce ...... . . . . . . ..... 255
Brongniartia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 256 3.9.15 Cytisus ........ ......... . . . 292 3.11.3 > y fo ~ r ~<l . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 3.15.4 Microcharis ... ............. 363
3.4.4
Plagiocarpus . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 256
3.9.16 Lembotropis .... ...... . . . ... 293 .11.37 So~ m'.nenngrn .............. 330 3.15.5 Rhynchotropis . ............. 363
3.4.5 3
Templetonia . . . . . . . ......... 256
3.9.17 Calicotome .... ... ... ...... 293 3.11 .38 ."1rnLhW · ·. · · · · · · · · · · ...... 330 3.15.6 Vaughania .... ...... . , .. ... 363
3.4.6
Hovea ....... . . ........... 257
3.9.18 Echinospartum .. . ....... .... 293 3. U .39 K~ ts ·hya · . . · .. ............ 331 3.15 .7 Indigofera .... ............. 364
3.4.7
Cristonia ....... ... , ....... 258
3.9.19 Erinacea ...... ............ 294 . (1. . ) Ht1mula ria ................. 332
3.4.8 3
Thinicola . . . . . . . . .......... 258
3.9.20 Retama ....... . .. . .. ...... 294 .11.41 Bryaspis ........ . .. ... ..... 332 3.16 MILLETTIEAE
3.4.9 3
3.9.21 Gonocytisus .... ........ . ... 294 .11.42 Geissaspis ... . .. . . ...... ... 332 3.16.1 Callerya ..... .............. 370
3.4.10 Lamprolobium . . . ........... 258 3
3.9.22 Genista ....... ..... .. .... . 295 .11.43 Pictetia ........ ... . .. .. . .. 333 3.16.2 Antheroporum .............. 370
3
3.9.23 Spartium ...... ...... ... ... 296 3J1.44 Diphysa ........ .. . ........ 333 3.16.3 Endosamara .. ... . . ......... 370
3.5 EUCHRESTEAE
3.5.1 Euchresta .... . ... . . , . , , . .. . 261
3.9.24 Stauracanthus ... . . .......... 296 3.11.45 Zygocarpum .... ........... 334 3.16.4 Sarcodum ... .............. 371
3.9.25 Ulex ......... . . .... .. , ... 296 3J1.46 Ormocarpum .... ........... 334 3.16.5 Afgekia ..... ........ , .. . .. 371
3.11.47 Onnocarpopsis .. ........... 335 3.16.6 Wisteria ..... ............. , 372
3.6 THERMOPSIDEAE 3.10 AMORPHEAE 3J 1.48 Peltiera ........ ... ........ 335 3.16.7 Austrosteenisia .... . ..... .. .. 372
3.6.1 Pickeringia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 3.10.1 Apoplanesia . ..... . ......... 301 3.11.49 Weberbauerella .. ...... . ... . 335 3.16.8 Leptoderris .. . ............. 372
3.6.2 Ammopiptanthus . . . . . . . . . . .. 264 3.10.2 Parryella ... .. . ... .... ... . . 301 3.16.9 Dalbergiella .. .............. 373
3.6.3 Anagyris . . . . . . . . . . . ....... 264 3.10.3 Amorpha ... ... .. . ... ...... 302 3.12 HYPOCALYPTEAE 3.16.10 Aganope . . .... . .... . ... . . . 373
3.6.4 Piptanthus . . . . . . . ........ .. 265 3.10.4 Errazurizia .. . . .... . . ....... 302 3.12.1 Hypocalyptus .... . . . . . ...... 337 3.16.11 Ostryocarpus ... ............ 373
3.6.5 Thermopsis . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . 265 3.10.5 Eysenhardtia ............... 303 3.16.12 Xeroderris ..... ............ 374
3.6.6 Baptisia ....... .. .. . .... .. . 265 3. 10.6 Psorothamnus ........ .. .... 303 3.13 MIRBELIEAE 3.16.13 Fordia ........ ......... ... 374
3.10.7 Marina ..... ......... ....... 303 3.13.1 Gompholobium ....... , ..... 340 3.16.14 Dewevrea ..... ............ 375
3.7 PODALYRIEAE 3.10.8 Dalea ..... ............... 304 3.13.2 Sphaerolobium ............. 340 3.16.15 Platysepalum ... ............ 375
3.7.1 Cyclopia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 3.13.3 Daviesia .... ... ........... 341 3.16.16 Sylvichadsia .... ........ , ... 375
3.7.2 Xiphotheca . . . .......... .. . 268 3.11 DALBERGIEAE 3.13.4 Erichsenia ... .............. 342 3.16.17 Schefflerodendron ........ . .. 376
3.7.3 Amphithalea . . . . . . . . . . ..... 269 3.11.l Vatairea ...... ......... ... . 310 3.13.5 Viminaria .... .............. 342 3.16.18 Craibia ........ . .. .. . ... . .. 376
3.7.4 Stirtonanthus . ... .... ....... 269 3.11.2 Vataireopsis ... ............. 310 3. 13.6 Isotropis .... ............. . 342 3.16.19 Disynstemon ... ............ 376
3.7.5 Podalyria . . . . . , , .. . . , , .... . 269 3.11.3 Hymenolobium . .. ....... . . . 310 3.13.7 Jacksonia .... .............. 343 3.16.20 Platycyamus .... ......... . .. 377
3.7.6 Liparia ...... .............. 270 3.11.4 Andira ....... ........ ... .. 311 3.13.8 Leptosema ... .............. 344 3.16.21 Kunstleria ..... .... . ... .... 377
3.7.7 Virgilia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 3.11.5 Adesmia ..... ... .. . ....... 312 3.13.9 Latrobea .... ....... . ...... 344 3.16.22 Burkilliodendron .. . .. . ... . .. 377
3.7.8 Calpurnia .... ... . .......... 271 3.11.6 Amicia ....... . ... . ........ 312 3.13.10 Euchilopsis .. .... . ......... 344 3.16.23 Craspedolobium . ............ 378
3.11.7 Zornia ....... . . ...... , .... 313 3. 13.11 Phyllota ..... .............. 345 3.16.24 Philenoptera ... .. . ......... 378
3.8 CROTALARIEAE 3.11.8 Poiretia ...... . . ... . ...... . 313 3.13.12 Otion ....... .............. 345 3.16.25 Hesperothamnus ........ , .. , 378
3.8.1 Spartidium . . . . . . .... ...... . 275 3.11.9 Nissolia ...... .. .... .... . .. 314 3.13.13 Aotus ....... ............ .. 346 3.16.26 Piscidia ....... .. . ......... 379
3.8.2 Lebeckia ..... ............. 275 3.11.10 Chaetocalyx ... .. ... .... . . . . 314 3.13.14 Urodon ..... .............. 346 3.16.27 Dahlstedtia . . .. . . .. . ...... . 379
3.8.3 Wiborgia . . ... ............. 276 3.11.11 Riedeliella .... ............. 315 3.13.15 Stonesiella ... . ....... . ..... 346 3.16.28 Deguelia ...... ............ 380
3.8.4 Rafnia ....... ..... ... . .... 276 3.11.12 Discolobium .. . . ........... 315 3. 13.16 Almaleea .... ..... .. . ...... 347 3.16.29 Lonchocarpus .. .. .... ...... 380
3.8.5 Aspalathus . . . . . . . . .... . .... 277 3.11.13 Cranocarpus .. . ............ 316 3. 13.17 Eutaxia ..... .............. 347 3.16.30 Behaimia ...... ......... ... 381
3.8.6 Lotononis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 278 3.11.14 Brya ........ ............. 316 3. 13.18 Dillwynia .... . ........ . .... 347 3.16.31 Bergeronia ..... .. . ......... 381
3.8.7 Bolusia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 278 3.11.15 Platymiscium .. ........ . .... 317 3. 13. 19 Pultenaea .... ..... .... ..... 348 3.16.32 Margaritolobium . ............ 382
3.8.8 Crotalaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279 3.11.16 Platypodium .. ..... . . . . . ... 318 3.13.20 Mirbelia ..... .............. 349 3.16.33 Muellera ...... . .. ..... .. .. 382
3.8.9 Pearsonia ..... ..... . ... . . . . 281 3.11.17 Inocarpus .... ............ , 318 3.13.21 Chorizema .. . . . ............ 350 3.16.34 Derris ........ .... . . . ..... 382
3.8.10 Rothia ....... ... . . .. .... . . 281 3.11.18 Maraniona ... . . ...... . . . . . 319 3.13.22 Oxylobium .. .............. 350 3.16.35 Paraderris ..... ............ 383
3.8.11 Robynsiophyton ............. 281 3.11.19 Tipuana ...... ............ . 320 3.13.23 Podolobium .. . ... .. . .. . . .. . 351 3.16.36 Millettia ....... . . . .. . ... .. . 383
3.11.20 Ramorinoa .... ..... ....... . 320 3.13.24 Callistachys .. .............. 351 3. 16.37 Pongamiopsis .. .. . .. . ... . .. 384
3.9 GENISTEAE 3.11.21 Centrolobium .. ... .. ....... . 321 3.13.25 Gastrolobium . .. ........ . ... 351 3.16.38 Pyranthus .... . . ..... .. . ... 384
3.9.1 Melolobium ... ....... .. .... 285 3.11.22 Paramachaerium . . .. .. . .... . 321 3.16.39 Chadsia ....... ............ 385
3.14 BOSSIAEEAE 3.16.40 Mundulea ..... ............ 385
3.9.2 Dichilus . . . . . . ...... .... ... 285 3.11.23 Etaballia ..... .. . . . ..... .. . 321
Polhillia ...... .. , .......... 286 3. 11.24 Pterocarpus ... ..... . ...... . 322 3.14.1 Goodia .... ............... 356 3.16.41 Tephrosia ..... ..... . . ... , . 386
3.9.3
Argyrolobium . . ............. 287 3.11.25 Cascaronia .... .. . .. . ...... . 323 3.14.2 Bossiaea ... ............... 356 3. 16.42 Apurimacia .... ......... .. . 386
3.9.4
Lupinus ...... .. . ........ .. 287 3.11.26 Geoffroea .... .... .. . ... .. . 323 3.14.3 Platylobium . ............... 357 3.16.43 Paratephrosia ... ... . . . ...... 387
3.9.5 3.14.4
3.9.6 Anarthrophyllum . . . ...... , . . 289 3.11.27 Fissicalyx ..... . . . ..... . . .. . 324 Muelleranthus .............. 358 3.16.44 Requienia ..... ............ 387
3. 11. 28 Fiebrigiella . . . . . . .......... . 324 3.14.S Ptychosema . . . . . . . . . ....... 358 3.16.45 Ptycholobium .. .... ........ 387
3.9.7 Sellocharis . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . 289
3.11.29 Chapmannia .. ............ . 324 3.14.6 Aenictophyton . ........ ..... 358
3.9.8 Adenocarpus . . . . . . ........ . 289
3.9.9 Cytisophyllum . . ......... . . . 290 3.11.30 Stylosanthes ... ..... . . ..... . 325 3.17 ABREAE
3.9.10 Argyrocytisus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 3.11.31 Arachis ...... . , ..... . .... . 326 3.17.1 Abrus . ................... 390
INTRODUCTION 17
16 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
3.18.58 Pueraria ..... ...... . ....... 418 ,19.25 hri~t.fa . .................. 443 3.24 GALEGEAE
3.18 PHASEOLEAE 3
3.18.59 Nogra ... ... . .. .. . .... .... 419 .19.26 l ys1ca r~u s . .. ... .......... 444 3.24.1 Glycyrrhiza .. .............. 478
3.18.1 Dioclea .. ..... ..... , ...... 395 3
3.18.60 Eminia .. . ... .............. 419 fp9.27 D sin d1as1. rum . ... .. . . . . . .. 444 3.24.2 Chesneya .... .... .. .. ...... 478
3.18.2 Luzania ...... . . . . ......... 395
3.18.3 Macropsychanthus ........... 395
3.18.61 Sinodolichos . .... ... ....... 419 3 ..19.29
1 9.2~ l llLniella .. . ......... , .... 445
l.epl clesmia .... .. ........ . 445
3.24.3 Spongiocarpella .... .. ....... 478
3.18.62 Pseudeminia . .............. 420 3.24.4 Gueldenstaedtia ...... . ...... 479
3.18.4 Canavalia . .. . . .. ... ... ..... 396 . l9.:i0 TI!eiotls ............. .. .... 445 3.24.5 Tibetia ...... ...... .... .... 479
3.18.63 Pseudovigna . ....... . ...... 420 3
3.18.5 Cymbosema .... ..... .. ..... 397 3.24.6 Erophaca .... .. . .......... . 480
3.18.64 Amphicarpaea .......... ... . 420
3.18.6 Cleobulia .. ... . ... . . . ...... 397 po PSORALEEAE 3.24.7 Oxytropis . .. ........ .. .... 480
3.18.65 Teramnus . .. ..... . ........ 421
3.18.7 Camptosema .... . . . ........ 397 3.20.1 Otholobium . . . ............. 448 3.24.8 Biserrula .... . . ............ 480
3.18.66 Glycine . .. .. .. . . .. ....... . 421
3.18.8 Cratylia ....... ......... . .. 398 3.20.2 Psoralea . . .. . .. . ...... , .... 448 3.24.9 Astragalus ... .... . . ..... ... 481
3.18.67 Phylacium ... . .. ... ........ 421
3.18.9 Galactia ....... ...... .. . .. . 398 3.20.3 Orbexilum . . .... . .......... 448 3.24.10 Ophiocarpus . .... .... .. . ... 482
3.18.68 Neocollettia .. .............. 422
3.18.10 Collaea ....... ............ 398 3.20.4 Hoita ... . .. . .. . ........... 449 3.24.11 Barnebyella ... ............. 482
3.18.69 Wajira .. . ... .............. 422
3.18.11 Lackeya ..... . . ........... . 399 3.20.5 Rupertia .. . . ............... 449 3.24.12 Colutea ..... •..... ... ... .. 482
3.18.70 Sphenostylis . . .. ............ 422
3.18.12 Rhodopis ....... ..... ... . . . 399 3.20.6 Psoralidium .. ....... ....... 449 3.24.13 Oreophysa . . .. ............. 483
3.18.71 Nesphostylis . .. ......... ... 423
3.18.13 Neorudolphia .. . .... . .... . .. 399 3.20.7 Pediomelum ..... . ......... 450 3.24.14 Smirnowia .... ..... .... .... 483
3.18.72 Alistilus ..... ...... .. ...... 423
3.18.14 Cruddasia ..... ... ......... 400 3.20.8 Bituminaria ..... .. ......... 450 3.24.15 Eremosparton . ..... ........ 483
3.18.73 Austrodolichos .. ........... . 423
3.18.15 Ophrestia .. . . .. ........... . 400 3.20.9 Cullen ... ... ... ....... . ... 450 3.24.16 Sphaerophysa . ... .. .. . ..... 484
3.18.74 Dolichos .... . ............. 424
3.18.16 Pseudoeriosema . ......... ... 400 3. 24 .17 Lessertia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484
3.18.75 Macrotyloma . ............ .. 425
3.18.17 Clitoria . .. .. . . ... ... ...... 401 3.24.18 Sutherlanclia ... ............. 485
3.18.76 Dipogon .... ..... .... .... . 425 3.21 SESBANIEAE
3.18.18 Barbieria .... . . .. .. .. ... ... 401 3.24.19 Swainsona .... ............. 485
3.18.77 Lablab ...... .............. 425 3.21.l Sesbania ... ............... 453
3.18.19 Centrosema .... .... .... . , . . 402 3.24.20 Montigena .... . . ........... 486
3.18.78 Spathionema . .. ..... ... ... . 426
3.18.20 Periandra . . . . .. ............ 402 3.24.21 Clianthus . .. .. ............. 486
3.18.79 Vatovaea .... ...... .. ..... . 426 3.22 LOTEAE
3.18.21 Clitoriopsis .... ... ...... ... 403 3.24.22 Carmichaelia .. ............. 486
3.18.80 Physostigma .. . . ..... . ...... 426 3.22.1 Hippocrepis ... ... ... . ...... 457
3.18.22 Apios ........ . ........ . .. . 403 3.24.23 Streblorrhiza .. ..... .. ...... 487
3.18.81 Vigna ....... ........... ... 427 3.22.2 Scorpiurus .. .. .. ........... 457
3.18.23 Cochlianthus ... ... ...... . . . 403 3.24.24 Galega .... . .. .. .... .... . .. 487
3.18.82 Oxyrhynchus .. ........ . .... 427 3.22.3 Securigera .... . . ..... ... ... 458
3.18.24 Shuteria . .... . . .... .... .... 404
3.18.83 Phaseolus ... .............. 428 3.22.4 Coronilla .. . .. ............. 458
3.18.25 Mastersia .. ... ............. 404 3.25 HEDYSAREAE
3.18.84 Ramirezella .. ... .. ..•.... . . 429 3.22.5 Podolotus .... .. . .......... 458
3.18.26 Diphyllarium ... . . .......... 404
3.18.85 Strophostyles ... . ........... 429 3.22.6 Anthyllis .. .... ............ 459 3.25.1 Calophaca . . .. . . . . ......... 491
3.18.27 Mucuna .. .... . ............ 405
3.18.86 Dolichopsis . ...... . . . . ..... 429 3.22.7 Hymenocarpos . .. . ......... . 459 3.25.2 Caragana . .... ... .. ... ..... 491
3.18.28 Kennedia ..... ..... ... ..... 406
3.18.87 Macroptilium .......... . . . .. 430 3.22.8 Pseudolotus ... ........ . . . .. 460 3.25.3 Halimodendron .. .. ... .... . . 491
3.18.29 Hardenbergia . .. ........ . ... 406
3.18.88 Mysanthus .. ........ . ...... 430 3.22.9 Antopetitia .. .. .......... . .. 460 3.25.4 Alhagi ....... ............. 492
3.18.30 Vandasina ..... ............ 407
3.18.89 Oryxis .. . . . . .. . . .......... 430 3.22.10 Hosackia ..... ............. 460 3.25.5 Eversmannia .. ........ ..... 492
3.18.31 Spatholobus .... ....... .. ... 407
3.18.32 Butea ........ ......... . .. 407 3.22.11 Ornithopus .. . . . ........... 461 3.25.6 Hedysarum . . . ............. 493
3.18.33 Meizotropis .. .. . . .. . .. , ... . 408 3.19 DESMODIEAE 3.22.12 Dorycnopsis .. .. . ... .. . . ... 461 3.25.7 Corethrodenclron ..... . ...... 493
3.18.34 Adenodolichos .. ....... . .... 408 3.19.1 Campylotropis . ............. 434 3.22.13 Kebirita . ... . . ......... . .. . 461 3.25.8 Sulla ... .... . ........... .. 493
3.18.35 Paracalyx ..... .. ........... 408 3.19.2 Kummerowia .. ... ...... .... 434 3.22.14 Ottleya ...... ...... , ...... 462 3.25.9 Taverniera .... .. . ...... ... . 494
3.18.36 Bolusafra . . .. . . ....... .. ... 409 3.19.3 Lespedeza . . .. .......... , .. 435 3.22.15 Acmispon ... . ............. 462 3.25.10 Onobrychis ... ........ ..... 494
3.18.37 Carrissoa . . . . . . ............ 409 3.19.4 Dendrolobium . ........ . .... 436 3.22.16 Syrmatium . . . . .. . . .. ....... 462 3.25.11 Sartoria . . .... ........ . .... 495
3.18.38 Chrysoscias .... .. . ... . . .... 409 3.19.5 Phyllodium .. . ....... . ..... 436 3.22.17 Lotus ...... . .. .... ..... . .. 463 3.25.12 Ebenus ... ... .... . ... ..... 495
3.18.39 Rhynchosia . ... .. .. ........ 410 3.19.6 Ougeinia . .... ... . . ....... . 436 3.22.18 Dotycnium ... ............. 464
3.18.40 Eriosema . . .. . . . . • ... .. . ... 411 3.19.7 Aphyllodium .. ............. 437 3.22.19 Tetragonolobus ........... .. 464 3.26 CICEREAE
3.18.41 Dunbaria . . . . . . ............ 411 3.19.8 Ohwia .. ..... ... . ......... 437 3.22.20 Tripodion .. . . . . ........... 465 3.26.1 Cicer . . . .... .............. 497
3.18.42 Cajanus ....... . . ..... . .. .. 412 3.19.9 Hanslia ...... ............. 437 3.22.21 Hammatolobium .... . . .. ... . 465
3.18.43 Flemingia ...... ... ......... 413 3.19.10 Arthroclianthus .... . ........ 438 3.22.22 Cytisopsis ... . .... . . ....... 465 3.27 TRIFOLIEAE
3.18.44 Erythrina .. ... .. ........... 413 3.19.11 Nephrodesmus . ............. 438 3.27.1 Parochetus ... , ..... . ....... 501
3.18.45 Psophocarpus .. ............ 414 3.19.12 Tadehagi ..... .. .. .... .. .. . 438 3.23 ROBINIEAE 3.27.2 Trifolium . . ... . .......... .. 501
3.18.46 Dysolobium .... .... ..... ... 414 3.19.13 Akschindlium .. .......... .. . 439 3.23.1 Hebestigma .... . .. . . .. ..... 468 3.27.3 Ononis ... . . ..... .. .. . .... 502
3.18.47 Otoptera ...... . . .......... 414 3.19.14 Droogmansia .. ..... . .. .. . . . 439 3.23.2 Lennea ....... .... . ....... 468 3.27.4 Melilotus .. . ............... 502
3.18.48 Decorsea . . . ... ........... . 415 3.19.15 Monarthrocarpus .. . ......... 439 3.23.3 Gliricidia ...... ..... .. .. ... 468 3.27.5 Trigonella . . ... ......... . .. 503
3.18.49 Strongylodon ... .... . . . ..... 415 3.19.16 Trifidacanthus . ............. 440 3.23.4 Poitea ........ ............ 469 3.27.6 Medicago .. ............ ... . 503
3.18.50 Calopogonium . . ... .... ..... 416 3.19.17 Desmodium ... ........... .. 440 3.23.5 Olneya .. . .... ............ 469
3.18.51 Cologania .. ... ............ 416 3.19.18 Codariocalyx .. ............. 441 3.23.6 Robinia ....... .... ... . .... 470 3.28 FABEAE
3.18.52 Pachyrhizus ... . ............ 416 3.19.19 Hylodesmum .. ..... .... .... 441 3.23.7 p 01ssoma
. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470
3.28.1 Vicia .. , .... . ...... . ... ... 506
3.18.53 Herpyza .. . .... .. , .... ..... 417 3.19.20 Hegnera ..... .... . ........ 441 3.23.8 Coursetia ...... .... .. .. . . . . 471 3.28.2 Lens . ... ............... .. 506
3.18.54 Neorautanenia .. .... ... ..... 417 3.19.21 Pseudarthria ... .... .. .... ... 442 3.23.9 Peteria ... .. . . . ........ .... 472 3.28.3 Lathyrus .............. . . . . . 507
3.18.55 Neonotonia .... ............ 417 3.19.22 Pycnospora ... ............. 442 ;·23.10 Genistidium .... ............ 472 3.28.4 Pisum . ... , ........... . ... 508
3.18.56 Teyleria ....... ............ 418 3.19.23 Mecopus .. . .. ............. 442 .23. 11 Sphinctospermum ...... . .... 472 3.28.5 Vavilovia ... . ..... . ........ 508
3.18.57 Dumasia . ... .. ......... . . . 418 3.19.24 Uraria . ...... .... .. .. . . . .. 443
INTRODUCTION 19
18 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
Biogeography of the Leguminosae
by B. o. schrire, G. P. Lewis and M. Lavin
Introduction
M< rley (2 ()0 implies <t 'moist 'quat rial m g:ithermal' The legume supertree (Fig. 1) is derived from a family-
o.rlgin of I •gumes, c. 8 - 7 Mn In lhe :impanhn. c>r wide phylogeny based on DNA sequences of the
ta:i:-.tn ·htian of the Upp ·r r lac ·<)US t11u. s upi rung chloroplast matK region (Wojciechowski et al., 2004)
a e:L >ondw<1na (or ausLrotropical) o rigin >r lh • and complemented by chloroplast trnl region analyses
fatnll (Raven & Axdr d , 1974; Raven & Polhill 1981). of the Caesalpinioideae (e.g., Bruneau et al., 2000;
'l'hl::. Jo ng-h Id Wes t ondwana hyp the. is fo r rh 2001; Fougere-Danezan et al., 2003; Herendeen et al.,
origin >f I 'gu m s requir·s dP f::tmiJy diversifl ~ttion 2003a; Forest (unpubl. data) and Mimosoideae
i.t: ., lhat or Lh ' I gu m ·rown ·la I ; Pig. 3) to b' at (Luckow et al., 2000; 2003; Miller & Bayer (2003), as
t ast 100- O Ma in ag ~( Lavin er al. _Q ; Davis "' ul. , well as chloroplast trnl and rbcl region analyses of
2002b), when Africa and South America were last in Papilionoideae (Doyle et al., 2000; Pennington et al.,
near contact, although Raven & Axelrod 0974) and 2001; Kajita et al., 2001). The emerging supertree is
Morley (2000; 2003) suggest that dispersal routes largely stable, although the circumscriptions of
existed over islands and ridges between these terminal monophyletic groups will continue to be
continents until c. 65 Ma. In addition, it is often stated refined as more taxa are sampled; it is, however,
(e.g., Morley, 2000) that the tropical angiosperm fossil already requiring us to modify our traditional concepts
record is biased to Laurasian collection localities, and of legume biogeography.
that if more fossils were available from South America Data from these large-scale molecular phylogenies
and Africa, the stratigraphic record for many groups have recently been compiled by Schrire et al. (2005),
would be older. to identify the major subgroups of legumes and the
Although it is true that legumes are now highly biogeographical inter-relationships among these
diverse in both Africa and South America, fossil data groups. The chloroplast matK phylogeny representing
alone indicate that neither a moist megathermal origin, a comprehensive sampling of all major legume groups
nor a Mesozoic age of legume diversification is likely. (Wojciechowski et al., 2004) served as the backbone for
The clear message derived from fossil legume studies the supertree (summarised with modifications in Fig.
such as those of Herendeen et al. 0992), Herendeen 3). In addition, major legume subclades ·detected in
& Dilcher 0992), Herendeen (2001) and Jacobs (2003) the phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast trnl and rbcl
is that all three subfamilies of legumes are well sequences noted above, were used in supertree
represented in the fossil record in North America, construction because they represented a more
Europe, Africa, and Asia by at least fruits and leaves exhaustive sampling of various local subclades. A strict
from recent times back to the Palaeocene. Putative supertree (sensu Sanderson et al., 1998) was readily
earlier legume fossils include only pollen and wood constrncted manually because of the high compatibility
specimens that lack any specific legume of all the component trees. Essentially, the large-scale
synapomorphies, and even then such fossils go back matK phylogeny (Wojciechowski et al., 2004)
only to the latest Cretaceous. Given the temporal and represented all major clades of legumes, and the other
sp. Lial ·on Linuity >f Ii er · ' legume ma ro foss il : molecular phylogenetic studies identified the broader
lhmughou1 Lhe C nozoi ·, and th • ·1hrupl abs nee f constituents of these monophyletic matK subclades.
d · ·Iclu uus l ·gume lcafl t and pods prlor to rhe Late The local subclades were then scrutinised for global
htl<t o · ·ne, the origin of I gu rnes is unlikely to b distribution patterns. Four generalised areas of
much bdore 60 Ma . lkmark abl y, the r:1 pld endemism predictive for legume distributions were
cli·v'rsin ·:nion of rite fami ly must h:.tvc >c ·urr ~d oon identified at the biome level , including a newly
alt ~r. B the mid 11 • Eo en· ( ·. 'ill Ma) n arl y all or lh · recognised amphi-Atlantic Succulent Biome. Schrire et
~1 HJOr lincag s h:1V1: a fossil recor<.l in orth America, al. (2005) subjected the resulting taxon-biome
lt'r pe, fril:a, and Ash .g., /\ xdrod , 1992; La in.,
00
supertree (Figs. 4 -14) to cladistic vicariance analyses,
9 ; II l" nc.I en ,, al. l 992; H er •ndccn, 2001). Tn to detect a generalised pattern of biome relationships
:tc.ldllion
e . • •' I ·111·0 n gram o r· Ll 1 • 111a/.1(, . p I1yIogeny (I,avm . for legumes. Chronograms derived from rate-smoothed
1
. nl., lrl rress shows minlrna I r ·st lu1 ion at ilw base bayesian consensus trees of the matK phylogeny (Lavin
O Ii , Ir ...... 1~"t
itlJ lh .
'"ween_niaior T< w n l ' Ia I · c11ve · rl': ii ..1•a lions, et al., 2004; in press) provided comparative clade ages
al~ ~· 1 llng the abntpl cm rg ' 11 .,. ,r :tll hut 0 111: major within the family, based on thirteen time constraints
>f l e~'Clm s b ·rw ·en O an I 50 Ma . derived from fossil evidence.
Ba/samocarpon brevifolium - Tribe Caesalpinieae Photograph by P. Baxter
.."'
0
Cll
·;:
:s l"I
"g
-.::: QI
.... ""...
·;:; t
II..
E
Cll
c
~Cll
...
Qj
; ~·a
cii-
c .. re mp ,,~ ,l~ )1 antl Iistu rlx 1nc (llre- l1isLOry to no fir _ have substantial centres in the other. Many legume
terminals assigned to R-areas, therefore, had to be
<(
......
..,..... .!!!
.c ~ 0-g
"'c:, hit 1y) g1,1Jicnts. The g ·m.:ralisctl combination of1h /;)'
..,·c;"' II.. 3:..!!
"g l,J
~
.c
t:
0
·;:: 1l
.~ N ,._
41
c
0
~ 0
0
.b
hMl resu lt I in recognising the four I io rne. which a r•
designated as also inhabiting G-areas (i.e., in Figs.
"'E :::E...
=
~ '°"'
0
..:E... ~
~
-:;;
::I
~
~c £::I
<(
--~ ...
Q ......
cit E-;
ie, c
....
Cll"'
::i "-
d •s ril ·d h I x . Thes in lud l l a semi-arid, fl re-
4-14 , R/ G or G/ R depending on which biome
contained more taxa) . Clades in the T-biome are
i V)
int I ' ran t, . uc.: ·ul 111-ri h a nd grass-poor, dry tropi ·a l
LI.I ...~
Cll
~
<( ~ v"'
0
Ill w
::I ::I Cll
.c ~
::I
~ >r •st, 1liid el , ncl bushlan I hiom ahhr ~via ted h •1 l()
subdivided into no1thern TN- and southern TS-regions,
• •••
0
c:s: ,.... ......
•• .., >
Cll
.!! ,.... based on their distinctive patterns of diversification
LI.I e, 'M ;
g
fti
c...~
succulent or . -), 2 a fir -lo lernnt, sue ul nt-poor and
:a across the phylogeny. Although each colour-coded
-0
Q
.E
~:§
~~ l"I
'°,....
N
0
O"&?~
Cll 0
0 CL grass-rich, sea on· dl y dry tropical forest, woodland and
savanna bi m ~ (Grass r G-), 3) a tropical wet forest box in the taxon-biome supertree (Figs. 4 -14) denotes
z .;1 N
0
N .~ Z
'-:'i_~
.... Cll
biome (Rainforest or R-), and 4) a temperate biome the predominant biome for that clade, the species
0 " ....
-.....
II)
l"I
~i ... E,1:-:::
ti ... ... including both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres numbers given are for the entire clade and not for the
..,
·cs"' ao :z: +
~ 2 ·=] (Temperate or T-). T hese areas reflect major
designated biome (u nl ess boxes are divided to
Q: :c.... "',.... o bn 0E II)
..:.= ...
::1
represent this split where the data for species numbers
~ .2.. ~ .! zonobiomes (Breckle, 2002): tropical wet (Zonobiome
~ ...
1111 ..,... 3: ........ a:!!!
~=~~ I), two areas of tropical d1y (in Zonobiomes II and III) , per biome are known). It is likely, therefore, that some
~z g ~~ E and temperate (Zonobiomes IV -X). species in single boxes may be centred in secondary
~ g--ro ~ (or tertiary) neighbouring biomes.
..,. ::::~ ti t:c.e Assignment of major subclades to one or more
Of the four fundamental biomes identified here
-0"' "'3: '° ... "' >-
'1~·-Q1
!9~4;~
biomes initially involved ascertaining the distributions
the Succulent biome is perhaps most novel and need~
::l 0
~c :~Cl.I 't ~ of c. 730 legume genera world-wide. Within each
.
l.:J
~~
,....
~
"'~.cc
~.!
0 ......
i :2
genus, patterns were especia lly sought among the to be distinguished from the similar, largely tropical
Southern Hemisphere (and Asian) Grass biome. These
~3: g ~:;;j range restricted species, e .g., the genus Caesalpinia
-=tZ ~ 11'1 GI sens. strict. has a worldwide distribution, but most biomes (Fig. 15) are described in detail below.
-='06:5!
.
~ ~~ ~CU ~ ~';
RI ._ .C
species are essentially limited to dry tropical areas in
A Succulent (S-) biome, comprising a semi-arid, non-
1111
°' c ......
0
~el
Cl.I .....
c ......
... .e
North America (twelve species in the Caribbean and
fire-adapted (or non-resistant and intolerant to fire),
·= three species in Mexico to Central America) with two
":I cc Iii~ ~z- succu lent-rich and grass-poor, dry tropical forest,
LI.I
c:s:
..."'g:, -.c Gt
t........£ :90 ~btl
species in South America , and in Africa (four species
thicket and bushland biome (Zonoecotone II/ III and
LI.I .E
in north-east Africa and Arabia, five species in southern
s~:t; Zonobiome III [Breckle, 2002) and highlighted as the
-
c
0
U')
ci.
ci.
.
Cll
Cll
·;:;
"'3:
~o
~t~;
() ·-
.c z .><
g~-g~
....
Africa, one species in Madagascar and one species in
central Africa).
Many legume clades have distinctive geographical
red area in Fig. 15). Pennington et al. (2000b; 2004)
refer to Neotropical Succulent regions as seasonally
0 ... ~"' ta .. dry tropical forests (SDTF's). The S-biome is the
~ -:-si~
:e ... o:i: and ecological phylogenetic structure, where stmcture
-:e
Cll
!;Oz ~~ Cll 0 ~
·-- smallest and most fragmented of the four biomes (Fig.
Cll
::I°:~ ~ refers to geography or ecology predicting phylogenetic
"'E
0
:;;$ "'~ .... Cl.I
rel~tedness among terminal taxa. Caesalpinia sens.
17) and is prone to bimodal or erratic rainfall patterns,
i ,.... ~:;:; ~ z
2 ::I .., .c
.... Cll and legume subclades inhabiting it have a northern
a:ri c - .,, strict. was thus attributed to a global distribution
i ..J 0 bn range - but with predictable Southern Hemisphere
.
•• ::I
."'
.,; ,....-..J a> c
0.W.c·-
8!~g
pattern suggestive of a Su ccu lent biome which
occurrences (as seen below) - characterised by a
I LI.I
<
.!!
·=
.... Ev
"g
Cllt'O
QI
~&f·;;;Q,I
-:
~11~
... a>~
occupies the red areas of the map (Fig. 15) and may
represent the remnants of a persistent dry vegetation
predominance of amphi-Atlantic disjunct taxa. Legume
I LI.I ~ ci. S:,c pe that was Lin k •c.i , in th· T "rtia1y, from ·irn 1n1-
genera in Succulent biome clades are listed in Table 5,
c ci. ~o~e
-
I 0-z " ...
Cll
Cll
'iii
"'3:
,...o
co~
-12
QI 3:
...
.!! .!:!, .g
Q
~.
1; - c
.&J
11)'1:1
m a~.om.m . ·s UL I1 Am •rk:-1 through .emni l meri a,
Me~ko and th Ca ril h >an, along lh , Telhys eaw:1y Lo
which identifies c. 26 amphi-Atlantic, c. 12 pantropical
and nine Africa -Madagascar -Asia disjunctions occurring
:Q ... ~ ... 0 ...
c ClJ •n;og
I -.....
0..
...
Cll
·;::
!!
v
,.... 3:
~o
~:ii! E ~
cu"'G>.C
::: ~ £
... .c ....
·i
fn :i, rahi ~1 an I Indi a (F.ig. L ). In Africa Lilis
~x t·cn cI ·c.If10 · 111 11! · H >J'll sou rhw:.i r ls lo southern AJJica
among and within genera. No tropical New World-
Asian disjunctions are found among S-biome taxa,
N~ u 0 uf althou gh seven pantemperate or temperate North
• . •Sll •h •s - I) 10
Q.I
~ Q
Cll
co~ ~ ·~ -s g alld
• Ma hga •se1r · 111 " t:ix a ar " o fre n sister lo
American-Asian disjunctions occur among and within
LI.I ."'
Cll
"'3:
~o
g ·om~
·-E :it•• ·-c ·-c
lades• conv.ttnmg
Bn Zmol)tome
1 ·
· · n ombinrn io n f -hiom · taxa (i.e.
LI , hut •xdu ling Z noec.:ownc IT/ ITT·'
the S- and TN -biome genera Cercis, Gymnocladus-
~ -0
·e ...
N~
~
Sl,~"'""
"""' E
~8~8 r · ·I' 1 • .. OO~) and H-b10 . 11 .. taxa (Figs. - J ). • Gleditsia and Cladrastis-Styphnolobium.
v"' 'O ~ ~ ~
"' >--"' ::I 0 f All g 'n ·ra cm1I 11 a. s1 ·gne <l to al I ·ast n >I' these The present-day S-biome encompasses regions in:
~;~o
"'~... bn 0 0 ...
pourl glo . lY::i I I11 · 0111 ·s on lb I a:-. is or lia ing a a) the Neotropics: semi-arid tropical to subtropical
.
c 000
3: o.c u; .5
>i: GI.,,
.C·-"O GI ofr t. nm man ·c.· 0 S(· ec~·1 . o curnng
nurse l .1
· the re. M·1ny g n rn Mexico , Central America and the Caribbean
• " es 'CC nc..b 1 (and ::;ome, te rtb1y ccnlr s,'
.!! LI\ '{fl.
CL .~_!!.~
s l"I
"Cl 0 u -
Cll :it ... gi
~ . (particularly the Greater Antilles; Wolfe, 1975; Lavin et
Ill
!E ~ ~ .!!! Pl ar ·ntly · · ' ..tal e ti wit. 11 subseque nt diversifi ·~ui o ns
.el
Cll '° Q..ru ... >
E g' .2. ..?'
into . ·is.-;( al., 2001b), linked frequently to circum-Amazonian
~ ~ :0
iii '-'
suppn ighhouring biom "s. This hyrmh ·:;is is al l a.'H 'Pleistocenic Arc' dry forest elements in South America
... nrtcd wile·, . :
i
;;;:.
(V'\....:
0 a,._
.! !GI l ~ll l in , . re gen n · P11ylog •n1es Mr ·· avail:,1hl for
g. St1 h s · ·o n la r Ii ·rs in ·a ti o ns hav
including the inter-Andean valleys of Ecuador and
Peru , the Piedmont area of north western Argentina
0
II..
w:l'.i~~
Smith, 2001); western Madagascar (Leroy, 1978; comprise one to a few species inhabiting S-biome
Schatz, 1996; Jansa et at., 1999; Lavin et at., 2000; Du vegetation, such as the monotypic Arcoa from the
Puy et al., 2002; Schrire et al., 2003) and Arabia to Dominican Republic, and its sister genus
West Asia and north-west India (Quezel, 1978; White Tetrapterocarpon, with two species from Madagascar
& Leonard, 1991; Miller & Cope, 1996; Klirschner, (Fig. 18). The reiterated amphi-Atlantic disjunctions s TN GR
1998; Conti et al., 2002; Cortes-Burns et al., 2004). within the Umtiza clade are consistent with an original
The Nubo-Sindian local centre of endemism, or distribution of this lineage along the margins of the S TN (G R)
subzone 3 of the Saharo-Sindian Regional Zone Tethys Seaway (Fig. 16). Similar north-south
(White & Leonard, 1991) is a critical part of this disjunctions to those between Gleditsia and
distribution as it is a floristic continuation of the Gymnocladus and the semi-arid southern African
Somalia-Masai regional centre of endemism into Asia genus Umtiza are also repeated in Cercis and
(Fig. 15). The remaining two subzon s (Sahara and Adenolohus (Cercicleae), Prosopis and Xerocladia
Arabia) comprise mixed S- and T-1io m ~ elements and (Mimoseae) and outside the legumes, Ephedra and CAESALPINIOIDEAE 2
are thus coloured yellow (Fig. 15), but their main Welwitschia in the Gnetopsicla. Ickert-Bond &
affinity is to the S-biome. Wojciechowski (2004) resolve a w 11 s upported FIG. S
The Umtiza clade (Herendeen et al., 2003b), sister Welwitschia-Gnetum clade sister to E'pbedrn. A further
and basally branching in the large Caesalpinieae sens. north-south disjunction is noted between mainly
lat. plus Mimosoideae clade (Fig. 3) exemplifies a northern temperate Gleditsia and its outlying southern
Succulent biome distribution (Fig. 18). The previous Brazilian and Argentinian species, Gleditsia
tribal affinities of the various elements of the Umtiza amorphoides Taub. The ITS analysis of Schnabel et al.
clade (Polhill & Raven , 1981; Polhill, 1994) were : (2003) reveals this species as sister to the rest of the
Gleditsia-Gymnocladus (from eastern Asia and North extant northern temperate lineages of Gleditsia. The
America), and Acrocarpus (south east Asia) placed affinity of this species is to the S-biome Misiones and
basally in two separate groups in tribe Caesalpinieae; Piedmont nuclei of 'Pleistocenic Arc' vegetation
-----1 DETAR I EA E1-----1
Arcoa (Caribbean) and Tetrapterocarpon (Madagascar) (Prado, pers. comm .). ··--···········-·····-·····················-··-··-········-···········--·-····-··1
in the more derived Dimorphandra group of tribe Disjunctions in the S-biome occur in both species-
Caesalpinieae; Ceratonia (north-east Africa and poor basally branching lineages such as the Cercis,
Mediterranean) in its own subtribe in tribe Cassieae Schotia, Poeppigia and Umtiza clades, and Basal
and Umtiza (South Africa) in the Cynometra group of Papilionoideae (including Cladrastis), or in speciose
tribe Detarieae. clades nested high in the tree. Speciose sister clacles
I
FIGS 4 - 14 Taxon· blome supertree. with major legume subclades representing a more exhaustive sampling of various local subclades than were used
=
In the matK phylogeny. Colour-coded biomes (as in flg. 15) were superimposed on the supertree: S = Succulent; G Grass; R "' Rainforest; TN =
Temperate Northern Hemisphere; TS= Temperate Southern Hemisphere. At= Africa ; Mad = Madagascar; As= Asia; Aus = Australia; Pac= Pacific: C/N [R)
"' Central or North America & Caribbean; S Am = South America; Eur/Med= Eurasia & Mediterranean; Pan= Pantropltal. The ratio's above each group
~the proportion of Rainforest (k-) to Grass (G·) blome species In the group if R/G, or vice versa If G/R. Clades are named, e.g. DET 1 = Detarieae sens.
strict. clade 1, according to their position within the major subclades. Many nodes are also Identified by the biomes (placed In boxes with arrows
pointing at the critical nodes to which they refer) as optimised In the DIVA analysis of Schrlre et al. (2005). The blomes are colour coded as In Rg. 15,
and are listed In decreasing order of occurrence among possible optimisations In the analysis, I.e. the first area Is either optimised most frequently or
at least no less so than the others. Biomes In square brackets= the only optimisation found; biomes underlined= present in all optimisations, and biomes
in round brackets = present in only one of a number of optimisations
Labichea,
Storckiella
grp. (1 Pac+ (19)
Aus; 2 Aus)
G
IE:l (31: 7) Neptunia,
Prosopidastrum, Leucaena
DETARIEAE G/ R
iI CAESALPI NI EAE s. /.
Piptadenlopsis,
Mimozyganthus
grp. (2 C/N
+ S Am; 1 As
Entada + Pipta· (25Am; 1C/N+ +Pac; 1 Pac)
CASSI I NAE
! MIMOSOIDEAE
deniastrum grps.
(2 Af; 1 Af + Mad
+As (1 sp. C/N +
SAm; 1 C/N +S
Am +As+ Aus)
PAPILIONOIDEAE SAm)
The position of Dlnizia,
Duparquetia is
equivocal I Pentaclethra,
Aubrevillea (1
Af; 1S Am;1
l-·- - -·-····- ···-··· -,·- -················-···· Af+C/N+S I~
i Arn)
[S]
!~~~~=~
(2
ium Alliance subgen.
Alliance (1 S con Alliance
CAESALPINIEAE s./. (25Am; 1 (3 C/N; 2 Phyllodineae
__
Am; 1 C/N +
Core Peltophorum (1 Aus+As
SAm;lAs+ C/N+SAm; C/N+SAm; C/N; 2 C/N +
grp. (2 AF+ Mad; 2 1 As) SAm) +Mad) _,
,__
Aus) 1 As+ Aus)
Mad; 15 Am; 2 C/N
(1 unpubl.); 1 C/N + I~ l 1NG10 J l tNGll l
SAm+Af; 1As+Af
+SAm)
PAPILIONOIDEAE genera.
· ~-···-----~ ----·- -----------~---....__--.-----.,
Possibly in
(See Fig. 10) Caes 4 to 7
(4 SAm)
INGEAEj t "'" I
i
! CAES t l
G IMOSEAE I
(S9) flG.12
TH
(1 0)
(10) G
G
Thermopsid- Genisteae (18 Eu"Med; 3
Af; 1 Af +Mad + Eur-Med;
~ MIRBELIOIDS INDIGO- MILLETTIOIDS s.s.
eae (1 C/N
sens. lat. FEREAE
~--
l·---·············---·-···-··--·-·-1
Sophora s.s. grp. & 1 Eur-Med+ temp. C/N +
temp.; 1 C/N
Eu chresteae (4 Eurasia; 5Am;25Am)
temp.+ E Asi
1 As+ temp. As; 1 As+
3 Eur-Me d)
Aus+ Pac +temp. S Am
+ Af (coastal)
(21)
G
Diocleinae (2 C/N;
1 C/N temp.; 1
SWARTZIEAE C/N + SAm; 45 Ophrest·
Am; 1 SAm +As; iinae (1 As;
2 As; 1 C/N + S 1Af;1Af+
Am+Af+As+ As)
Aus; 1 C/N + S Am
+ Pac+ As+ Mad)
PHASEOLOIDS
PAPILIONOIDEAE 4
FIG.13 (80: J)
PAPI LIONOI DEAE 2 G/ R
Glycininae (4 Af; 7 As; 2 Af +As; 1 Af +As Phaseolinae (7 Af; 1 Af +Mad;
FIG.11 + C/N + S Am; 1 C/N temp. + E As; 1 As+ 1 Af +Mad+ As; 2 Af +As; 1
Aus; 1 As+ Mad; 2 C/N + S Am; 1 C/N Aus; 1 Pan; 2 C/N + S Am; 1
~ '---~-------' C/N +As; 3 S Am; 2 C/N)
. . .~-----------11
. DALBERGIOI DS s.I. 1-1- - -- --------•.- ..__..,,..___~~~--------~~~--' ~
'-------r-------.1~
Cajaninae . .- - - , - . . . l [S G]
-..~---------"[ DALBERGIOID CLADE li------------~)lo~ L--···- -··· · -·-·---- --·-----· ~- .. --... ········-·· .. ······-·· ·--------·-·1
PHASEOLOIDS I I l
!
ADESMIA
CLADE ~
PTEROCARPUS CLADE -----1 DALBERGIA CLADE 1--- ---1•
)lo
!I
(61:
44) i
G/ R Desmodieae
(197: 185) Desmodium grp. (7 As;
(91) 1 C/N temp.+ E As; 1 j
G/R
As +Aus; 3As+Af;1
Chapmannia,
G As+ Mad; 1Af;1 Pan;
I
(246) (114) Styiosanthes Daibergia, 1 Af +As+ Aus) iI
clade (1 C/N + S Machaerium grp. Ae schynomcne,
1S 6(15) Am+Af+ Mad+ (1SAm;1 C/N + S Humularia grp. (1 S Am Diphysa clade Clitorilnae (1 !
As; 1 C/N + Af; Am; 1 C/N + S Am 1 C/N + SAm +Af+ Mad (2 C/N; 1 Af; 2 S Am; 2 C/N + I
Adesmia clade (3 S Am; 1C/N;4 SAm) + Af +Mad+ As) +As; 2As+Af;1 Af+
Mad; 2 Af; 1 As)
Mad; 1 Af+
Mad +As)
S Am; 1Af;1
C/N + S Am+
i
1C/N;1 C/N + SAm; 1
IP181 ~ i
~ ~
Af +Mad+ As
~
Amorpheae C/N +SAm +Af+ Mad
+Aus)
(1 C/N temp.; +As+Aus)
5 C/N; 2 C/N
+SAm)
~ ILLETTIOIDS S.S. I
lGENISTOIDS/VATAIREOIDS I BAPHIOIDS
HOLOGALEGINA
IRLC
ROBINIOIDS
(27)
TN
(16:14)
G/ R
s (, R TNI
lndigofereae; Millettioids/Phaseoloids
flG. 16 Palaeocene map reconstrud.ing the Tethys Seaway, based on Scotese (2001). A seasonally dry to arid tropical belt apparently became Tethyan-
wlde only in the Tertiary, and covered much of the S-blome regions in CAmerica, N Africa and Arabia to W Asia. This belt Is sandwiched between two ba.nds
of wetter tropical climate (Scotese, l.c.), the boreotroplcs to the north and the austrotropics of the Southern Hemisphere and SE Asia to the south. This
arid belt is noted by Scotese (I.e.) to expand northwards into N America, the Mediterranean region and W to C As ia in the Neogene and then it ls
squeezed southwards again in the late Neogene by expanding T-biome dlmates
with ± equivalently sized amphi-Atlantic diversifications Baudouinia group (Fig. 6), the Umtiza clade and
(where each is well supported as well as the two Pe llo j h< ru m group fi'ig. 7 , rJ1 Faic.lhe rb la-Z·1pot ·a
together being well supported), reflects a pattern of g roup Fig. 9), Lil ' Leld.1 Styph no lobium lad rnsLi ·,
reciprocal monophyly (Cunningham & Collins, 1998; a nd Lh J Acosm i11 m- D I ·r:-1 or ·talum grou ps ( Fig . .LO),
Lavin et al., 2001b). Examples of genera (or sections tri h Am rph a J Pig. I l ) and l ri h · Tn ligofer ac (fi g.
within them) showing this pattern of continentally 12J. Tiu· 11 g h ut the fa 111il , run 1:1111 •ma l :wi.tches in
disjunct and genetically disparate sister clades include biome pr •f ·ren , • occur bet\ e n 'arly hra n ·I tin g
Baubinia sens. strict.; Caesalpinia sens . strict.; li.n · :1g 'S an I th ir siste r grou r .' a rpea ring l() drlv,
Chamaecrista and Senna; Mimosa and Acacia subgenus diversification across the phylogeny.
Acacia; the Ormocarpum clade, Chapmannia and
~yloscm1b 'Si Sesba nia , Lh L' /11 rltgvfera :ml clades, A Grass (G-) biome, comprising a fire-adapted (i.e.
1t:/Jbi-ost 1, IJ'1y1hrl11a , and tJ1e \l(r1,t1c1-Pl t1s >o/us clad · prone to, a nd t >lerant of or reslst;.i nt to nre), succulent-
lrable ')). R •lativ I few amp l1i- tJanli · di ·jun ·rions ! >r and gnss-iich, seaso na lly dry tro p ical rorcst,
c ur in Pf'l'dc min:intJy R- and G-biome clacles (e.g., w clland and savanna (w ><Jed grasslan d ) biom
th e 1Iym ·m1~a- >u ibo urtia-Peltogyne clacle in the (Zonobiome II excluding Zonoecotone II/ III [Breckle,
D 'tari •a ·ee bc lowl).
J [
2002], and highlighted in brown in Fig. 15). The G-
th. Vicarian e. nalysi. (Sci 1rir el al. , 200')) um1ers ·o re · biome is the second largest of the four biomes (Fig. 17)
b'e pred minance or su b 1~1 des assigned lO rhi.! ._ and generally has a unimodal rainfall pattern. Genera
1 111
t thm are s islcr (and f)LIL:.Hivdy h:1~a lly bra n hing) often also occupy th e R-biome (Zonobiome I),
,. ·~o · ub hcl ' ·s ,.1ss · 1·gn , l 1 to Lu
1.
' R- anLI - I11
·0 111.cs. sugge sting that dispersal or habitat s w it ·!ting is
c.Xni11J)I ·s 0 1· S I I
Ln , _· • _ ., 0~ 1 chides ·howi ng Lh is r 1 ~11i nsllip common between th ese two, whose I o u n J aries
FIG. 15 World map with four generalised legume distribution patterns at the biome level: Red =the Succulent (S-) biome; Brown= the Grass (G-) biome; s 11 c1 · lh e r ·1s.-Ad no lo l us grou1 (Fig. ·i ) th fluctuate constantly in response to climatic change.
Green= the Rainforest (R-) biome and Blue= the Temperate (TN-) and (TS-) blomes · )Olia -13arn ,, d ci '
Y ' n run group (Fig. "\ , the Po pplgi:1- Distribution centres a re confined largely to the
Gymnocladus Acrocarpus
r ASll\ N AM EIWA li'!lll;\, SE AS IA
6 spp. 1 sp.
S AMERICA AFRICA
FIG 19 p
FIG . 18 Umtiza clade after Herendeen et al. (2003b) with clade ages superimposed after Lavin et al. (2004; in press). Distributions colour-coded to biome · alaeogene se d"
e •ng of Leguminosae from a putatively Tethys Seaway (Lauraslan) origin
as in Fig.15
"'
c ......
"'
N
.g., aesalpin i e~1 ~ and .M imosea (having t11~my more percentages of genera restricted to any one
-bio m ~ s p ··i ·s ith o nl y 12% <tn I l % H-hiom continental region and this is correlated to higher
·1pdes r i1p ·c[ivdy. The l::i tter two Lrihes 1!~1ve 7'5% numbers of intrageneric disjunctions. Examples of
rn1 I 76% or gen ra reslri t d tu un ly o ne o f th ab v ·· pantropical R- and G-biome intrageneric disjunctions
continental regions respectively (Table 4). Clades in R- (Table 5) include Copaifera, Cynometra, Parkia,
and G-biome areas, therefore, show a high degree of OcJ//Je r.~lr1, Pterocarpus and D • modium, while
interrelatedness across the southern continents and inle rgc n .. ric pantropical disjunclions o ·cur between,
for exa mrle, JJr/Of'l..Gl ( ~entral Ail1 rica), lh ' 0 .. )!Stig ma
tropical Asia, despite the high levels of generic
endemism within each continental region and the long group (Africa and f iugiode 11.dro11
1-Jroch'lg, uesia CSouL b i\me ri a), A.fz e/ir;1 AJri 'a -Asia)
si a ; -I
I
I I f • o
.............. -... ....... .._
• • o ' '
........
periods during which these landmasses have been
isolated from each other. This pattern is reflected in the ~1 nd l n.lsin ( A:> ia); or Platycyamus ( outh i\n1 erica) $ ~ -:;- 8
DO
N
...
"
/'-.'
thus considered likely to have seeded norrh wards into America) and lnocarpus (Asia). Amphi-Atlantic
the wetter boreotropics and southwards into seasonally lis jun('Lions oc ' Ur h ' l We n , ror ins tance FjJe/'11.C/
dry vegetation types emerging in South America, (. ' outh Ameri ·a ~ind '/. nwnocof •11s-Eurypetulum
eastern to southern Africa and Madagascar, and Asia (A fri ca l; Di y tnfJe Sout h Arn ·rl ·al and che
(Fig. 19). This h poLh esis d •rives from th h.igh d 'gre ' JJo fyst monan.tb11s group ( Africa) ; D/11 izit1 (Smith
of intergeneric rel al ~dn ess foun I across th e 1.ropi ·s , Arn ·ri ·:1) and Aubr,villoc1 (Afr i «t) , anti withi n
and also account for Lh ~ high lev ~ l s of ge r ri · Pentaclethra (Neotropics-Africa).
TABLE 4 (RIGHT). Statistics of genera and species in Leguminosae. No. (%) =number and percentages of genera and species, or 0
of inter-continental disjunctions. An additional four genera to the main treatment of the book are recognised here (i.e., 731 vs. ...... ,:;;,
727 genera), representing the putative segregates of Acacia. Numbers in bold highlight the highest percentages and numbers <t
"'00
N
of genera and species across the table. Gen/spec= genera/ species; the four continental regions used are Af-Mad =Africa·
Madagascar; As/Pac/ Aus= (tropical) Asia-Pacific-Australia; New World= Neotropics and temperate North and South America;
Eur/Med= (temperate) Eurasia-Mediterranean (Including Africa north of the Sahara)-Macaronesla. lntergeneric disjunctions
are noted when sister genera, within phylogenetically supported clades, are distributed exclusively In different inter-continental
regions (i.e., one genus does not have endemic species in the same region as the other). lntragenerlc disjunctions are noted
when genera are distributed in more than one Inter-continental region (I.e. they have endemic species in two or more continental
=
regions). [SJ = Succulent biome; [G) Grass biome; (R] = Rainforest blome, and (T) = Temperate biome. * ·= this figu re is
artificially high with S-blome genera being scored as though all species occurred in the S-biome, thus further researd1 Is
needed to derive more accurate figures; in general those removed from the 5-biome will be transferred to the G-blome. For the
total number of tropical/subtropical dryland species add figures (percentages) in the S· and G-biome columns. Crown age refers
to the crown clade of a higher taxon, i.e. the age when the diversification of extant species occurred, as seen on a tree where
a single lineage begins to branch
Northe rn Hemisphere TN- tax a gene rally comprise commu nity, TS-biome , Australian tribes Mirheli eae :tncl 'CJ
<:: ·~
e
elements derived directly from S- or G-biome clades Bossiaeeae <Figs. 1 & 3). This group of tribes, referred i::"
13
<:: E' ~e .sc:
Q ;g 2Q -<: ~.,Q
(Figs. 4 -1 4). Southern Hemisphe re TS- taxa , e.g., the to he re as the Mirhelioids se11s. lat., have a crown cbde -<:
_, -~ <:; "' ~Q e-Q §..0..
'-"
Aclesmia, Hypocalyptus, Mirbelieae- Boss iaeea e, age of c. 55 ± 1.1 Ma (la In l!I al. in pr ss), indicating ..:
u
"'0 <::
<:: - E .~
.~
a surprisingly old <lisjun ·Lion l tw e n so uthe rn Africa a:0 <»
"'"' ;t cs ":'
Podalyrieae and p oss ibly Pso raleeae clades, however, 8
~2 8
~~E
are themselves principally sister fo nd often basally and Au:-;Lralia for this grou p of I 3gum .. A 111.inimal bO ,_
z"'
!:; -!:!2
c: '-'
b c:c: "'
Q; <»
..: ·- <»u b .!:: ·- Q.
----
~
\.9
Vl
l9
-.
I
Vl-<:
NU
,!::
Q
Q
E
I I
I
l9
N
l!)
-.
Vl -.
.-<
I.!)
""C:-
-
Q
..E
..-< ""
or G-biorne outgroups. Australian Restionaceae . The last opportunity for dirl:ct
Legume clades with a tempe rate distribution are ove rland dispersal b lWe n these regions was c. 160-
3
4-14). Predominantly TS- clades more often have Euraslan ·rncl M ' cl it rran<.:}111 clades, which may h:1ve
secondary diversifications back into the tro pical G- di s jun c t' :rnb ·lacl · s ln th l mp ra t N w World.
0
Sopbora sens. strict.). Schrire et al. (200')) resolved the includ ing the l'oclalyriea , rotalarieae anJ Gen isl :ie °'--
Ou
two temperate areas in a basal polytomy , revea ling have th ir h ttsal ly bran ·hJng Jame n Ls in w a rm 5~
3: u
that tempe rate-in ha biting clad es are often re late d to temperar s uLhcrn Afri ·a, alth ough th S-hl me z rf_
each other, but they are inconsistently related to the A ·osmium-Di ·rne petalun dade Is a [>UtaLiv ' outgro up
or this a ll ian ·e. M mb1.;rs of th ·s g •nistoi I groups
other three biomes.
Temperate distribution patterns include a subtropical, ::ipp 'ar to hav ~ eithe r migrate I northwards through
mo nwn ' trop l :a l Africa to Lh Mee.lit " rran a n ,111 d
--
(.!)
~
Ma caron es ia , for example , th e ge nisto id tribes clc>s ~l y trH ·k Lh · d.istril utional palt rn ob:»rved in 1lte ~
Vl
vi
Crotalarieae and Genisteae and the phaseoloic.I tribe L ) t ~1 , a llh< ugh Cullen has a n xte n s iv cJ fi eel
J
3
.!;:!
.s
Psoraleeae. Southern, central and eastern European Austra lian liver ifi nLion .rim s, Jl 7). The puw1j e ly -<:
distributions are commonly linked to montane western basnlly branching so uLh rn Afri ·an tbo/11bimn :i nd ~Vi's"'
c:"'
Psora/ea lim.ag s, howev r, rei t rat ·1 -g ~
to eastern Asia, or cold temperate central and north- z - c:
t: g
in LI ge nJsLo ld tril e · rotalari :1
--
I
eastern Asia (e.g., tribes in the IRLC). Australasian I-
V'I ~ U)
di stributio ns ma y be la rg ely e nd em ic (e.g., th e ( i rim s, 1 · 0) . Th ~ · uri an ~1 ·ea :ire a I utati v~ Vl .-< <O: .-<
mirb e lioic.l s) o r linked to north ern patte rns (e .g ., ( utgrm1p or Lhe I gumes (see page 45), and ha ' a
Psora leeae) . All TN-hiome clacles are derived from S- disjunct listril l!Lion in Centra l a n I orth Ame rict1 ::i nd
or G-hi ome clades <Pigs. 4 -1 4 ), e.g., the Sophora Aus tralla ( myn et 611., 19 5 , · hich is similar to 1h:1t f _,
u.J
<(
ci.
Oii
"'
"'
c:"'
:~ :~
0.
Lhe Brongnia niea ~ in Lb gen ist lei subdade .
Vl
group including The rmopsid eae, and the mLC tribes ,
best illustrate this pattern. Most TS- dades, however, Id ·r d ive rsWcalio ns in th · TN- r g io ns bas cJ o n
"'
z
w
z
u.J
0
0
"'
·~
..c: -
l9 c:
Vl -
l9 c:
Vl
u"'
- Vl
ro -
Cl> Cl>
~~
u
z ~ ~.g -. 0
"'"'y
th rate:'> ;u1a l ys~s or Lavin. '/ u./., 2004 ; in press) are
0::: ·~ Cl>
3 R/G - inter (Cojoba 1 G - inter (Lysiloma 1 G - intra (Acacia 1 R/G - intra (Albizia)
lngeae [Inga - Old World
lngeae -Albizia- grp. -Archidendron; -Acacia subgen. subgen. Phyllodineae)
Enterolobium-Abarema grps.] Abarema grp.- Phyllodineae)
Pararchidendron;
Chloroleucon grp.-
Cathormion)
PAPILIONOIDEAE
Basal Papilionoideae (Pl - PS) 1 S - inter (Cordy/a- 3 R/G - inter (Bobgunnia- 1 R/G - inter (Alexa- 2 S/TN - intra
Aldina grp.) Swartzia; Amphimas- Castanospermum) (Styphno/obium;
Myroxylon grp.; Cladrastis)
Mildbraediodendron-
Amburana grp.)
1 R/G - intraspecific (flndira)
1 TN - intra (Lupin us) 1 G/T - intra (Sophora) 1 G - intra (Rothia) 1 G - intra (Crotalaria)
Genistoids [±temperate
groups (P10- P14)] 1 TN- intra
(Thermapsis)
Millettioids 2 [Core-Millettieae
(P30 - 34)] I
1 G- inter (Piscidia-
Philenoptera) I 2 R/G - intra (Derris;
Millettia)
1 S/G- intra (Tephrosia)
I ~
Millettioids 3 [Phaseoloids - 4 intra; 3 G- 3 S/G - intra (Erythrina;
basal core-Phaseoleae (Psophocarpus; Flemingia; Rhynchosia; Eriosema)
r
(P42 - P44)] Cajanus) 1 S - (Paraca/yx)
Millettioids 3 [Phaseoloids - 1 TS- intra (? 1 G/R- intra 9 intra; 5 G- (Neonotonia; 2 intra; 1 G - (Teramnus) 1 TN- intra
Glycininae-Phaseolinae Otho/obium) (Oxyrhynchus) Dumasia; Strongylodon; 1 S/G- (Vigna) (/lmphicarpaea)
(P45 - 47)] Nesphostylis; Lab/ab)
4 S/G - (Cullen; Wajira;
I
I
I Macrotyloma; Dolichos) I
Robinioids [Sesbanieae (P48)] I 1 S/G - intra (Sesbania)
I
1 TN/TS- intra (Ornithopus)
I
I I
1 S/G/T - intra (Lotus) 1 TN - inter (New World
Loteae genera -
Eurasian/Med. genera)
1 TN - intra (Hedysarum)
I RLC [Trifolieae-Fabeae
(P54- P56)] L L L L 1 TN - intra (Parochetus) 3 T - intra (Trifolium;
Lathyrus; Vicia)
or subtropical North America and eastern Asia, linked wet tropics of the southern continents and south-east rom U1 La te Pala oce ne w Lh e lioc ne S-biome is optimised in an intermediate position relative
often to mesophytic forest refugia such as those in Asia (austrotropics), and the boreotropics to the north '
· 0 awa Yf
_ ?O()j) Jn ti
. .
Mrdcll e Eocene c. 50- . Ma),
( · ·01es . .. ·
0
40 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE LEGUMINOSAE 41
erratic p;:i1tem of rnl nfall o f mi1ny ext:1nt S-biom ar as al., 2000). The pattern of reciprocal monophyly is also ( . e I 'ss c ngru •nl, na rr wly define<.! a nd e lement (e.g. , Nordenstam, 1974), is thus characterised
srrucwr · 1· · · . . . 1 ]' ·I · "'
as opposed to the mu ·h m r r 0 ul:lr and pr di ·La l I reveal e d in clades occupying the mainland and . 11 ·tal le dlstrib11l1 ns) o mfM I <. L~ t 1~ • -
J
'?m . by disjunct taxa being found predominantly above the
unimod a l pattern in the R/G-hi o mes (\XlhiL ~. 1983; continental islands, e.g., the Greater Antillean robinioid P' t 'thin Lh , H/ li -bio m ·s, ·xp · n n ·ing lugh r species level. Widespread taxa have thus probably
en •r:i 1 •
Garcillan et al. , 2003). The great age of plant taxa genera Pictetia (sister to Diphysa from Mesoamerica) , 1i 11 r'll 'S thus · ;:1n o nl y b ass ign ~ c.I lo de creased in species abundance and the resulting
I
imi n gr.1 . ' . ~ ... . refugia have been isolated from o ne another for at
occupying the S- habitats (e.g., Pennington et al., 2004; and Poitea (sister to Gliricidia from Mesoamerica; ti n •nL::i l-w1d R- OJ C1-.u e<1s.
Lavin et al., in press), therefore, may not be clue just to Lavin et al. 200lb; 2003). This pattern is not evident t)~l'IW secon I · 111111 n bi ogcogrr1pLtic patte rn - the least one to two million years , more than sufficient
persistence of v ·•g1::tati >n and .omp nent lineages that among clades occupying the mainland and oceanic l:i k , f widcl ulstri blll. d :- p ' i 'S '.n th~ '_-I iome ~ time for speciation to occur (Cowling & Hilton Taylor,
are adapted to unpre di table rainfall , but also to the islands (e.g., Hawaiian Silverswords [Asteraceae]; y LS with in t rco11t11P nta l sp ·c1cs d1s1nbutlo ns m 1997; Hubbell, 2001).
on11 .l~ . .
reduced rate of recent dispersal (i.e. immigration) into Baldwin, 1997). th , TN -, H- ::ind r-l iom •s. l' ''. m pl he re mclud ? The predominance of reciprocal monophyly, the
this dry biome. Regular dispersal of new taxa into local regions of t ·/l'af~ci!ll · rilpimts L. , A . a m >ru.:am1 I fc ok.) M.E. abundance of genera confine d to the same single
l is1 rsa l and pers iste nce of tax a ha ving a a global metacommunity (biome) means that a few J oes, ;inti !1. a/Jorl~it~11111. L~i · h ·1 ~~s . ~ ~x .'p1"ng. regions within continents , and the lack of
predil e ·ti n for the S-biome is well •x mplified by immigrants will establish over time , some will become (B~i rnt::by , 19 , :Y.yt1 opl.~ a~ m~; s fn~ ( I.. ) D ., intercontinentally distributed species among legume
the ·o nUn nwl structur in the phyl oge ny of the more common through ecological drift, and more or iodo ar/ a A. ra 1 , and . u1s 1dt1 utt. Ba rneby, taxa centered within the S-biome regions of the world
1 52 , ~ u wl le pr ad in the T -bi me, and A ndin:i
Umtiza clacle (Herendeen et al., 2003b) . Disjunct less equivalent numbers will go extinct as a result of
1 1 are probably the result of one process: the contractio n
Northern Hemisphere species of the once supposed this process (Hubbell, 2001). The lack of detected lntJrm is, Lori bocmpus s>ri ell , and iVJa c;hue rtum in size of the S-biome during recent geological times.
s iste r ge nera Cleclilsia and 1y mJ1 0 ·tadu · have b e n reciprocal monophyly in most G- and R-biome clades lnrtflll.tllZ whid1 va rimLo; ly inhabi t R/ -bio mc.:s in the The S-biome has apparently been restricted in size as
xplain cl by Te rtiary interconllne nw l land I ridges can be explained by high levels of immigration into >btr pies ancl N "rl ·:1 (e.g., Thom , l l 72; Penningto n, a target area for sufficient time to reduce successful
( ~ . g ., S ·hna be l et al. 2003 . N w Cl ,dl/. ·icl o f the local regions of these global metacommunities 2003). Lists of i.n te r o nlin •nl'dly lisLrilx m.:cl sp c ·ies immigration into local regions of this metacommunity.
Northern Hemisphere is known to be sister to Umtiza increasing resident extinction rates through ecological uld in ludc o ·r l '.'i R- o r -hi >111 1 ·gum ' r.axa Well delimited species or clades of species are thus
from an S-biome local region in South Africa. This drift, thus reducing species accumulation within trans- dl tril \H ,d throug hou t the I ro pi ·al wd o · a ni · isla nds largely limited to old lineages. The drought tolerance
ecological pattern is matched by the one disjunct oceanic sister clades. In S-biome clades, however, the of lb world ( Lavi.11 , u npubl ished l<1t<1 ); th s oft ' 11 of the S-biome is probably the most important factor
South American species, Gleditsia amorphoides, which predilection of legume. to persist in this biome has not being linked to the presence of resistant, lo ng-noa ting limiting immigration , espe cially from other biome
inhabits S-biome local regions in the Piedmont and resulted in an x Lin tion rate that eliminated the seeds. Notably, many intercontinentally dis nibuted elements that have a high water requirement.
Misiones centres of 'Pleistocenic Arc' vegetation pattern of reciprocal monopbyly. The build-up of species have infra-spe cific taxa confined to one While monophyletic clad es in legumes are often
(Prado, pers. comm.). The Umtiza clade provides more or less equal sized trans-oceanic clades with continent (or oceanic island) , suggesting tha t confined to distinct continental regions, cladistic
another example with the Dominican Republic time, therefore, is likely to be the result of restricted immigration is ::in ongoing process that over time vicariance studies show no consistent pattern of
endemic Arcoa, which is sister to the Madagascan immigration (i.e., <lis p rsa l into local r g ions of this manifests itself as phenotypically divergent continental relationships (e.g., Lavin & Sousa, 1995).
Tetrapt.e rocarpon. Historical migrations among biome and standing dlversily being gene rnLcx l mostly populations. The presence of widespread species in the These authors considered that the phylogenetic and
sue ule m-rl.ch, seasonally dry tropical forest, bushland by endemic speciation. RIG- and TN-biomes which also comprise relatively biogeographical patterns of the tribe Robinieae are
and thicket worldwide provide a more parsimonious A manifestation of reduced immigration rates into more recent diversifications than in the S-biome, again seemingly as well explained by chance dispersal as
explanation of the global distril uLion of the Umtiza the fragmented local regions of th e global S- points to the more current role of dispersal assembly by the Boreotropics or Geoflora hypotheses. To
clade, than invoking the extinctio ns of certain lineages metacommunity is that lineages of species separated (i.e. species assembly through immigration) in the determine if vicariance or dispersal is more likely to
in puli ·ular regio ns of online nts , om or whi ch from sister clades for sufficient time come to occupy former biomes. ex plain legume distributions across the Tethys Seaway,
w r pu ta tiv "ly o nnecte d by now submerged la nd continentally confined and widely disjunct (often The lack of species dis tribute d among distinct age distributions of a range of trans-continental crown
I ridg ··. , a ·h o r,, hi ·h has a di ff rent ag1:: l .avln et ell., amphl- At la ntic trans-continental) distributions. The regions of the S-biome can also be found intra- clades were established using a Penalised Likelihood
Umtiza ·lad pattern is widely re peated in other continentally in South America (Prado & Gibbs, 1993; rate-smoothed Bayesian likelihood analysis of cpDNA
2004; in press).
The Umtiza clade is also typical of clades confined endemic taxa of the S-biome. For example, in the Murphy & Lugo, 1995; Pennington et al., 2000b; 2003; m.atK or nrDNA ITS sequences (Lavin et al., 2004). Of
to, or centred in the S-biome in that it shows two Ormo ::i rpum cl a de, Diphysa is confined to 2004; Lewis et al., 2003a, Linares-Palomino et al., 2003; 59 trans-oceanic clades of taxa ranked at the species
common biogeographic patterns that are otherwise M iw a me rica, Pictetia to the Greater Antilles, Prado, 2003; Wood, 2003) and Africa (Verdcourt, 1969; level and above, 51 have ages between 1 and 22 Ma
uncommon in the other biomes. One is that trans- Zygocarpum to the Horn of Africa, Orm.ocarpopsis De Winter, 1971; Thulin, 1994; Jurgens, 1997). Jurgens with the rest scattered through 30 to 50 Ma. The
Atlantic clades predominate and often show reciprocal and Peltiera to Madagascar, and Ormocarpum to 0997; his Figs. 2 and 4) illustrates two of the most majority of continentally confined clades have crowns
monophyly, or a deep phylogenetic split se pa rating e a stern and central Africa , Madagascar with one common Africa-wide disjunctions between the arid less than 10-15 Ma. Estimated ages of these clacles,
Old and New World sister clacles . This ma y manifest species widespread in Asi.H (Lavin et al. , 2000; Thulin north and south of Africa. His Fig. 2 represents an therefore, show a strong Neogene to Quarterna1y bias,
itself as continentally confined clades each showing a & Lavin, 2001). In ·o nLrast in R/ G- clades, although t!ss ' utia lly S-hi<me Horn of fri -:.1 disjun t i .n w ith the not older modes as would be predicted by continental
intrageneric species diversity is to a gr ·a t r or lesser sou Lh-w st Africa n Ka roo- a mih regio nal e ntre o f hi s tory. As the dates of these major peaks of
large degree of phenotypic divergence. The second is
extent continentally confined, rel a1Io ns between •nd rni m <White, l 98 a nd :ilso id nti.fi ed by Le brun disjunctions correspond to when dry environments
a lack of species that are distributed on both sides of
g ·11 ra an d ofl en within larg g ~ n ra ) are (lt '7) :ind Quezel 0978 > ·1s rh u·op i ·~ii r mi • nora were rapidly expanding, but post-elate large-scale
the Atlantic within the S-biome.
"ha ra t risec.I by e ithe r pa ntro pi ·al c.listrib1.1tio ns ( .g.. or 'R<111d nor::i '. Disjun ·Li on. h r ar comm n al th continental movements and the existence of putative
The pattern of reciprocal monophyly is also well slst r ·S() ~,... i cs, , s · ti.c n ~Hl d g ·nu s le e l, but f w
illustrated by the Ormocarpum clade and within Cyn o met ra, o r I cw n P r foritt [ entral stepping-stone land-bridges, metacommunity processes
Chapmannia (Lavin et al., 2000), and a clade including Am · ri .il, 0 o:tig nu1 [Afri ·al a n I K i11giod>ndron [ i;J I, ed' ·nmp l · l1·1v" • .. I) en 1'd n 11·r·1 , d o 1· 111
. rra. p e ' 1·t··1 • (sensu Hubbell, 2001) are most likely to explain these
1
in l e wriea ), o r by Afri ·a-As ia d istribuLions (e. 0 • IU n 'lions ·urring b twee n Lhes · regio ns (Th ulin disjunctions in legumes, rather than processes invoking
Old World Vigna sens . strict. and New World ·•
1994 11 . • I
Phaseolinae (Lavin et al., unpublished data) . Even the many mille LLi ids a nd pins o lo i Is), o r N ·w orld- · ev r. Fig. of Jurgens C1 97) describes r1 singular historical continental events. Fossil and
m , <-r• ·n ~ r'J l nortJ)t:fll :ind souLhe
th
.
rn African d isjunclion
genus Wajira , largely confined to the Somalia-Masai As in distri butions e.g., w ithin Ormosia lg nisl ic.lsl, r mol e cular evidence sugg e sts that trans-oceanic
r gio n · ntc.:recl in the Horn f Africa, r ·pr s nls a b e tw ·n 'J 'i/mana [South Am •ri a l a nd J11 oc;c11pas . HI has . • 1<1 u1v rs1 1·a u. ns int
suhst·1nt·· I . 1· 'f' . LI1C . - I 1
.omc disjunctions in legume taxa arose neither at the same
ll(.1:.t n1an in tJ ' · 1r • •
[Asi a l in th dalb rgio lcls ), o r h y a n1phi -Atl an1ic l" 'fl' 1C 110111 :.t ncl Za ml 7..1:111 ( 111 lh SOUlh ) time nor under the same set of geophysical and
mo nophyl •lie group separated fro m ils loscsl isl r by -...('t .1onal · o 1• nd rnism (
·•rt' res
clistrihuli <> ns ( e.g., I c rw Jn Hy m ew.Jet1 a nd . climatic conditions. Rather, such disjunctions have
>Vt.: r 10 Ma Thulin et al., 200 ) . Th c.I · p : pJii Or tn frn .-;n " f 1
J
..
separating sister clades, resulting in the pattern Guiho11rlla ID •tariea I o r u •ttrtz ia and l3obg 11 m1ia $Lli... •1·t!U c <l isJlincl i >ns r·1nke d a l vari e Ly a n I multiple geographic origins, dispersion pathways and
I) , p ' ·1' I I a r . 1111110 11 h IW et.! 11 th e: · lW O
referred to as reciprocal monophyly, is a signature of [Swartzieae]) . Such a mphj-A1lantic distributions are . . q, CV divergence times.
.1 .as. Th SI .
long isolation of each of the sister lineages (Lavin et relatively few, and sho w I ss ontinental phylogenetic ' - 1 me Afric:.ui 'a ri I ·o rrid r' r Afro-arl I
legumes are Miocene to Holocene in origin, thus much P rs .on 20(1 1; r r Sl, unpubl.). In ~ uda na e:-1e ' Lh , (reflecting the scoring of Cercis) also in three of the four
(e.g., Upchurch & Wolfe, 1987). This also coincides 1
with the known spatial and temporal distribution of of the present diversity in th · fam ily is Neogen ' in lc~ ica~ g ~us R 'cCb ici is disj un t Lo a large ly optimisations (Fig. 4). The G- and R-biomes are each
age. This is loo recent for clisjun ·tions to be ex p lained Aus1ral1 . an l1 \' e 1·s1·r·c·I <I t I' Orl, a ( 1·LS[rJ·1
) Ll[t. On f)artcrn optimised only once at this node. The node diagnosing
legume fossils (Herendeen et al., 1992). mn11nisc •nt of rl1 u_· . I .
The rapid divergence of the family, as noted by the by o nlinenlal history, e.g. , l.a rge-s ale con lin •ntal ·ri , ' : · pap 1 no1t tnbe Brongn ia rtieae . tribe Cercicleae, however, is optimised by all four areas
· l Sunan·1 · ...... 1 •
chronogram data of Lavin et al. (in press), and the near movements and the existence of putative stepping- . • ..... \sensu rayn •f r-1 / ., 19< 5 , ·o mprises more or less equally. The age of the Cercideae stem
l I11 e spc ·le of I'
instantaneous Tethyan-wide representation of fossils of stone land-bridges. The present pattern of legume . \eccl.11&. 1 .10 Mexko, o n , in L11 R- and clade is c. 56.5 ± 1.7 Ma, based on penalised likelihood
two tn Lile I1 ·1 h pantropi al liLLCral sh rub (PL) rate smoothing in the rates analyses of Lavin et al.
distribution thus appears to be overwhelmingly the • ome., l
almost all major taxa, is in accordance with a putatively U l'/cllJtl II/Cl 11 ··t · ·
'sudden' opening up of a novel dry-adapted flora along result of global dispersal within and between peur. . rni a, :inti In Au s tralia , Ccf. ch:l!lt1 (in press); i.e., this is the earliest putative age of the
/
ti ty is (a ti"e In th e G-1 lom seas nally dry Cercideae lineage. The Cercideae crown clade,
the Tethys Seaway in a post-Cretaceous extinction neigh! uring biomes . The historical legacy of these
woodk1 ncl 'ind LI1. ·k . ·
environment. There is increasing evidence that many melacommunities is one of dispersal assembly within oJ·s '. K et, lrom ue·nsl a n cD , two s p ~ ies however, marks the age of the diversification of extant
1vtobasm11 1 c·I 1 . 1
major angiosperm families diversified during the similar ecological settings world-wide, thus the biorne th' ,1· s lf1.I >. m cry Gir-biome s rubland to species (as seen where the lineage begins to branch)
concept as used here ta kes on extra significance for the
le L on san I 1:.1
A\ . .
h
, om art ern Terril ')' to \J' stern and the PL age here is c. 23.4 ± 3 Ma. Since all genera
Tertia1y and do not extend back into the Cretaceous 11.ilra 1ia) ·1nd G ·1r. / ·
(Tiffney, 1985b; Magallon & Sanderson, 2001; Davis et unde r.::rancl ing :ind im rpre tation of plant distribuLions. I ie m , f. • lll'JO.Y za mo1wstylis a tree in th e H- have not yet been sampled, the crown may be older but
. )rt;i ~·
1 111
al., 2002a). In the Tertiary, many extant families and Phyl og -•oles can b used in hist 1i -a l blog ogrrq hY Quee nsland ). Crayn " f c1l. <19 5) nnc.J probably not significantly so.
genera first appeared as part of a modern flora, spurred for cir ·ums ·ii ing gl< bal biom s, unde rsta nding 1h Ce1 ~/el! · unpu l I. ~\lp po n R " cb ic1 b in' . ister to In the Cercideae, 58% of genera are restricted to
· ta , .ind boll · only one of any of the three major inter-continental
on by coevolution with pollinators and dispersal agents. relationships between them and estimating relative llria11 . l ar S IS l e r LO rb e r S l o f th
rates of immigration within and among them. a .ie. In Fig. • Re 'bict i. ·oded a:; an ·-1 !om tropical regions, with 67% of genera present in the
This was a period of major change in global climates,
Chaetoca/yx lo .
ng1/oba Photograph by G. P. Lewis Pithece//obium exce/sum Photograph by G. P. Lewis
-===~==~;~
Trine C r id a is basally I ranching iJ1 th of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam; Larsen et al. 0984)
L gumin ae (Brun au el al., 2001; HerencJ en et al., for the Flora of Thailand; Chen (1988) for China, and
2003:1), ::is pr di t -·d by Wund din et al. 1981), and Larsen & Larsen in Hou et al. (1996) in Flora
,'ercis Is th m st basally branchlng genus in th Lrib . Malesiana. Zhang 0995) published a morphological
While much taxon mi· work l·l<1 , b n carri d out n cladistic ;.inalysis of the series of Bauhinia sens. lat.,
rhe Lril io the pa st thirty y ~ars .g. , L;.irsen et al., but few species of Bauhinia have been included in
1 80, 198 ; Wunde rlin , 1976, 1979; Wuncl rlin et al., molecular studies. It remains equivocal as to whether
J981 , 1987; Zh~mg, 1 c 5; Vaz, 2 03· Vaz & Tozzi, 2 . , Bcmhf.ni 1 sens. lat. is monophyletic, but preliminary
fe s pe i s hav ' I e n includ ed Jn phylogen Li molecu lar results indicate that some elements should
an:ilyses and inter- a nd inu·a~ge m:ri relationships a r be reinstated as distinct genera (Bruneau et al., in
Lill largely unre olv •<l with Lb cprjon of C rci · prep.; Forest, unpubl.). This runs contrary to the
(Hao,, al. , 2001· Davis el al. 20 2b . findings of Larsen & Larsen in Hou et al. (1996) who
Wund rlin J 97 and Wunc.I Jrl in el al. 1981) concluded "that Bauhinia in the sense of Linnaeus,
di id I th tribe into two sul u·ibcs, Cer idinae and Bentham, De Candolle, T;.iubert and Hutchinson is
Ba11hiniint1e, I as don se cl fl ml and rruit ·ha ra rs. an evolutionary unit and a ve1y natural genus''. Larsen
Walpers 1842) b~id already down-ranl e l Bau hiniea and Larsen also noted that Bauhinia sens. lat.
!Jenth . ( I 0) Lo uhtrilx d sr:uus, rhus the ombinatioo presents a reticulate p all rn or variation across its
lhuhiniinae B nth. Wun le rlin 1 7 is superfluou -. pantropical range (this appar ntly ·onflicting
P lhill Cl 99'1 J ~pt I he ,er id ae un ·hanged with two somewhat with its status as a "n:m1ral gen us ") . While
·ubt ri bes a nd five genera . Whil th CercidintJe this is undoubtedly true if the genus is considered as
c nlalns three small distin t gen ra, 'erck , 'rij]on'ict all-inclusive, recent studies of legume distributions in
a nd Ade11 l bus, th Ba11h1:1iiintP hou ,·e the genera l (Schrire et al., this volume and 2005) have
m nospc ·1n Madagas :rn g1::nus Br >11i >r a an I th revealed repeated patterns of generic distribution
large divers pantwpical g nu Htutbi11ia sens. !Ctt. which appear to be duplicated by at least some of the
whkb has I e n segr g t cl into a· many as tw nty-six segregates of Bau.hinia . If these segregates are
gene ra by vari )US authors (Wund rlin 1976). recognised as distinct genera (as several are in this
While ma ny of th IUwbini 1 scgr gat s are bas "cl treatment) then the reticulate pattern of variation of
on minor morphologi ·ll c.liffe ren · s thers are Bauhinia is far less pronounced. More sampling at
distinguish <l morphologi ally by a suit of chara te rs. the species level in molecular analyses and more
13rillo n and Ros l . 0), in th ir a· ·ounl or th ~ morphological studies are needed across the full
Cae 'tlpinia ·e:1 r r th orlh Ameri ·an Flora, di id ·d pantropical range of Baubinia sens. lat. before inter-
Bt11tbi11ia into sev ral s gr ga te g n "ra in ·luding and intra-gen Jrlc relationships are clearly resolved. In
clmel!a Raddi whi ·h h r is Lr :-uecl as a synonym c I' the current ac ount genera that have been recognised
Phm1era , hut might pr v ~ l<> I e di tin t as indicated as distinct from Bauhinia in at least one flora
in ree<.:111 molecular amil.yse!'I by r r ·st (unpublished treatment that post-dates De Wit (1956) have been
data . l:MtL n and Killip 093 r ·ognis d 'cbriella as treated as separate genera, especially where these are
clistin :t from Bauhinia in ol mbb . 1 Wit 195 , supported by the preliminary results from a
tr <i ting 'Malaysian Tiauhinieae', r ·ogn ised ch loroplast trnl Cintron and spacer) sequence analysis
Bra tl/ola nthus, Ly, tpbyllum, Gigasipbon, Piliostigma, (Forest, unpubl.). The reader's attention is also :ilerted
l.astohema and Pbtt1Pra a. separa te gene1 n nd this to the detailed infra-generic division of Baubinia by
Was larg •ly foll wed by subsequent flora writers in Wunderlin et al. (1987) in their reorganisation of the
Africa and New uinea (e.g., Brenan, 1967; Coetzer Cercideae which also forms a sound basis for
& Ross in Ross, 1977; Verdcourt, 1979). Others have sampling in future studies.
retained a more inclusive Baubinia proposed by Palynological studies of Bau.hinia (Larsen, 1975;
Wunderlin et al. (1981 , 1987), e.g., Macbride (1943: Schmitz, 1977; Ferguson & Pearce, 1986) have all
207 -220) for Peru; Larsen et al. (1980) for the Flora stressed the considerable variation in pollen
TRIBE CERCIDEAE 57
morphology within the genus sens. lat. and there are The Cercideae as presented here (Fig. 20) includes
clear correlations between pollen exine ornament- 12 genera and (322)- 335-(348) species. This treatment
ation, floral morphology and pollination. It remains to differs from Wunderlin et al. (1981, 1987) and Polhill
be seen just how closely these correspond to 0994) in that Bark/ya, Gigasiphon, Lasiobema,
evolutiona1y relationships of species. Nevertheless, Lysiphyllum, Phanera, Piliostigma and Tylosema are
Schmitz (1977) made several new combinations in considered distinct from Bauhinia. While some of these
segregate genera of Bauhinia based on palynological may well be reincluded in Bauhinia after further study,
type. These included new names in Lasiobema, yet other genera may be reinstated from within
Lysiphyllum, Pauletia, Perlebia and Phanera (Pauletia Bauhinia. Bracteolanthus, treated as distinct by De Wit
and Perlebia here considered as synonyms of 0956), is here included in Lysiphyllum following
Bauhinia). Zhang 0995), who analysed morpholog- Wunderlin et al. (1987), while Bark/ya, considered
ically the series of Bauhinia proposed by Wunderlin et congeneric with Bauhinia by Wunderlin (1979) and
al. 0987), concluded that while some supraspecific Wunderlin et al. (1981, 1987) is considered distinct
segregates of the genus were supported, none of the· following George Cl998b) and Forest (unpublished
subgenera appeared to be monophyletic. Several data). The reinstatement of Lasiobema appears least
realignments were proposed. well supported (Forest, unpubl.).
Cercis
Adenolobus
Griffonia Cerds sll/quastrum Photograph by R.8.G., Kew Adeno/obus garlpensls Photograph by P. Van Wyk
Cercis L 1753
Brenierea n
10 spp,; Eu1asia, China and N Ame1'ica (1 in E USA to NE Mexico, 1 in western N
Ame1ica 1 2 in the Mediterranean 1egion to C Asia , and 6 rest1icted to tempernte
Bauhinia IT1 China in E Asb)
;;o Derived from cerkis, the ancient G1eek name used by Theoph1astu.s fo1· C.
n
Gigasiphon - siliquastrum L.
Shrubs and small trees; warm temperate <ind Mecllterrane<in climate zones of N
0 America and Eurasia in mesophyric forest, meclite11anean bushland and thicket
OJ IT1
OJ )> (chapar1-al and maquis), lower montane forest ;incl mixed deciduous forest
c:
- Tylosema IT1 Refe1ence(s): Hopkins 0942); Li 0944); lsely (1975: 134 -150); Robertson 0976);
::J"'
Robertson & Lee 0976: 48-52); Hao el al. (2001); Davis eta/. (2002b)
::::i A membe1 of subtribe Cercidi11ae (Wunciedin et al., 1981; 1987). In the molecular
I
OJ analyses of Davis et at (2002b) 1 C. canadcmsis L from eastern N America is 11101e
I Barklya Vl
I~ ~
closely rehued to C siliquastrum from western Eurc1si::1 than to C. occidenta/is
:J Toirey ex A.Gray from western N Ame1 irn The pseudopapilionoicl tlowers of
:
\fl, Cercis species sha1e many speci<11isations found in flowers of typic:.11 members of
subfamily Papilionoideae 1 but these are convergences and are not indicative of
Lysiphyllum 0
:--.. dose evolurionc.11y reh1tionship (Tucker, 2002b). Desides, Cercis flowers have
'ascending cochlear' co1ollc1 aestivation, nol 'descending cochlear' as in
I Phan era Papilionoicleae. Neve1theless, the flowers of Cercis differ ma1kedly in st1uctu1e
Lasiobema and development f1om those of Ba.uhinta (Ttu:ke1, 2002b). In the moleculai
analyses of Bruneau et al. (2001; unpubl.) and the combined molecuial'-
?Piliostigma morphological analyses of He>encleen et al, (2003a), Cercis is basally b1anching
both within lribe Cercicleae and the whole of the Legurninosae
Some species, e.g., C. st/iquastntm (Judas tree) OI C. canadensis L. (redbud) are
Detarieae (see page 69) widely cultivated as ornamentals; also used for medicine, human food (flowers,
young pods), bee forage (honey) and timber (the Indians of N America made
Cassieae (see page 111) bows from the wood of C cmwdensis)
Caesalpinieae (see page 127) Adenolobus (Harv ex l3enth & Hook.f) Tol're & Hille. 1955
Mimosoideae Ba11bi11ia sect. Ade110/ob11s Harv . ex l3enth. & Hook f. (1865)
2 spp . (1 wirh 2 subspp )j Ka100-Namib Regiomd Centre of Endemi~m in N:rn1ibia,
Papilionoideae Angola, Botswana and NW Cape Province of South Afri<..."i.1
From ade110- (Gk : gland) and /obos (Gk : Jobes or pocls), alluding to the often
? = position uncertain (but not always) glanduhll' f1uits
Shl'tlbs (erect or p1ost1ate) 01 small t1ees; twpical lO subtiopical arid sh1ubland on
coarse gmvel, stony slopes and sandy 1ive1 beds
Refe1ence(s): To11e 0963); Brummitt & Ross (1976); Coetze1 & Ross in Ross (1977:
55 - 58)
A member of subtribe Cercidi11ae (Wunderlin et al. 1981, 1987), and a number of
m01phological characters suggest a 1el<1tionshlp with Cercis , Only recently inc\udecl
in molecuh1r analyses (Forest, unpubl.) where it i.s si.ster to ~1 polytomy containing
Griffoultl, Brenierea, and Bauhinia sens Int
FIG. 20 Diagram of relationships in tribe Cercldeae based on a recent preliminary molecular analysis (Forest, unpublished) Adeno/obus garlpensls Photograph by P. Van Wyk Both species g1azecl by livestock and game
Gigasiphon schlechteri Drawing by unknown artist lYlosema escu/entum Photograph by A. E. Van Wyk & S. Malan
D etarieae by B. Mackinder
The Detarieae sens. lat. are pantropical in distribution, before anthesis. Essentially, this resulted in the
with c. 58% of the genera confined to Africa (incl. reassignment of Cowan & Polhill's Amherstia group
Madagascar), c. 20% to the Neotropics, and c. 12% to genera (Amherstia, Tamarindus and Humboldtia) from
tropical Asia. Only Copaifera, Crudia and Cynometra Amherstieae to Detarieae with the remaining genera
are pantropical (and all possibly non monophyletic) forming tribe Macrolobieae. In 1999, Breteler (pers.
and Afzelia, Guibourtia, Hymenaea, Intsia and comm.) proposed a modified Breteler 0995) tribal
Sindora are native to at least two of these regions. The system in which Macrolobieae was maintained, the
apparent high level of diversity in the African tropics circumscription of Detarieae was greatly narrowed and
may in part be an artefact of the (relatively) greater the genera newly excl uded from Detarieae were
taxonomic effort that has been invested in the study of together recognised as Cynometreae sens. strict.
the African taxa. Characteristic of African Detarieae The first comprehensive studies of phylogenetic
taxonomy has been the splitting off of disparate relationships in tribe Detarieae sens. lat., were the
elements as segregate genera, while this has often not analyses of Bruneau et al. (2000; 2001), based on
been the case in the Neotropics. Both regions, nucleotide sequence data from the chloroplast trnL
howeve r, currently contain large paraphyletic intron. They found that tribes Detarieae a nd
assemblages requiring detailed species-level analysis. Macrolobieae formed a well supported monophyletic
Eighty-two genera and from (729)- 747 - (765) species group, which included all genera placed previously in
are treated here in Detarieae sens. lat. (Fig. 21). Of the Detarieae sens. lat., excep t Umtiza. Bruneau et al.
132 (extant) species so far assessed for IUCN reel data (2000) examined 71 genera, with the African taxa most
status, 97 have categories of threat. Of these 73 are widely sampled. The key results of the analysis were
assessed as vulnerable, 13 are endangered and 11 are that none of the generic groupings proposed by
critically endangered. Cowan and Polhill 0981a & b) and Polhill 0994) were
The remarkable range and complex patterns of suppotted as strictly monophyletic, and the majority of
floral modifications found in the Detarieae sens. lat. the members of tribe Macrolobieae (although not
have proved a considerable challenge to the Macrolobium) were placed as a monophyletic group
establishmen t of widely accepted and clearly derived within Detarieae sens. lat. These analyses also
circumscribed generic groupings. Based on the work of repeatedly recognised a second group of related
Leonard 0957) and Cowan & Polhill 0981a & b), ten genera made up entirely of resin-producing taxa, with
Inf rm:il gr ups of g a ra wcr propo ~ d ; Lh · the exception of some species of Guibourlia. The
Cynom e Lra , H ym nost i~ , H ym na 'a, Cruck1, resins can be seen as translucent gland dots in the
Det~1rium an I nrown e~1 groups in trib Derari a", and leaflets and (sometimes) other organs. Within the resin
lhe B •rl ir1ia , M;icrolobium , Amh •rslia an I 13ra hystegia producing taxa, the genus Prioria and several
groups in tribe Amherstieae. Genera with imbricate members of Cowan & Polhill's Crudia group were
bra l ·ol ' aestivation were assigned to Detarieae whilst consistently placed together (see taxonomic notes
rh se With valvme bra -r •ole a stivmion w r placed in under individual genera in main text). Another
Amh 'rstieal!. P U1iJl 199 retain cl th se gen ri · subclade within the resin-producing Detarieae
group ings with a f a ldlti ns t a ommodaL comprising six members of Polhill's Detarium group
recentl y cl •scril l gen ra, and merg d Lbe two tril : was repeatedly recognised (Bruneau et al., 2000; 2001;
lnio a sing! broadly cl Gned u·ibe, Detari ae en . lat . Fougere-Danezan et al., 2003). In addition, in the trnL
Bret l r 199-) proposed the r · ogniLion of Lwo intron analysis, the five sampled members of Cowan
trlhes Wilh in Detariea ei1 . lat. , s paraLecl according and Polhill's Brownea group were consistently placed
l lhl' r •!alive size and po itioo of d1e paired I ractcolc together with Macrolobium, although this grouping
LEFT Ba b
rne ydendran riedelii Photograph by G. P. Lewis
TRIBE DETARIEAE 69
Cercideae (see page 57)
was not upheld in a more recent molecular and base of the clade, and within some subclades, greater Neoapaloxylon?
combined molecular-morphological analysis resolution was provided but as several groups were Schotia
(Herendeen et al., 2003a). Within the exclusively not well s upported , it would be premature to Barnebydendron, Goniorrhachis
African Macrolobieae of Bruneau et ct!. (2001 ), a well emphasise the details of this greater resolution. Brandzeia
supported subclacle of six genera was recognised by Elsewhere the addition of morphological characters
Oxystigma, Kingiodendron, Gossweilerodendron, Prioria clade of Bruneau
Gervais & Bruneau (2002) and as the 'babjit' clacle produced weaker resolution and a less robust Prioria, Colophospermum, Hardwickia et al. (2001) ;;o
rn
sensu Wieringa & Gervais (2003). Bruneau et al. (2000; phylogeny clue either to conflicting phylogenetic signal Vl
Daniellia
2001) confirmed the view of Polhill 0994) that the two or increased hornoplasy in the morphological data or z
both. The order of taxa followed here (Fig. 21) Eurypetalum -0
tribes Detarieae and Macrolobieae (sensu Breteler, ;;o
1995) are best considered a single entity. Evidence represents a synthesis of the present understanding of Eperua 0
0
from ontogenetic studies by Tucker (2000, 2001, putative relationships within this (perhaps most Augouardia, Stemonocoleus c:
2002a) challenged the validity of bracteole aestivation morphologically diverse) tribe in the Leguminosac. Peltogyne, Hymenaea, Guibourtia
n
rn
;;o
as a criterion for subdividing Detarieae sens. lat. and Unsampled genera in the combined analysis arc Hylodendron, Gilletiodendron Vl
identified a set of character states associated with two inserted into this order where morphological evidence Baikiaea, Tessmannia, Sindora, Detarium clade of Fougere -
modes of floral development (Circular and Omega) appears to suggest close relationships. Sindoropsis, Copaifera, Detarium Danezan et al. (zoo 3)
Detarieae
whose distribution amongst cletarioid genera does not Whilst significant progress has been made since sens. lat.
support Polhill's groups. Polhill Cl 994), further studies (particul::trly including Endertia, Lysidice, Saraca, Leucostegane '
The analyses of Herendeen et al. (2003a) united a the non-African members of the larger and less wcl l
Talbotiella
morphological dataset with the chloropbst trnl intron understood genera) are needed before a new
comprehensive classification of the Detarieae sens. lat. , Scorodophloeus
dataset of Bruneau et al. (2001). The combined analysis
provided mixed results within Detarieae sens. lat. based on a synthesis of all available data, can he Crudia
compared with the molecular dataset alone. Near the established. Lebruniodendron 1
Plagiosiphon
Micklethwaitia :'
Maniltoa, Cynometra
Tamarindus
Amherstieae clade
lntsia, Afzelia, Brodriguesia 1
of Bruneau et al.
(2001) Loesenera
Neochevalierodendron
Normandiodendron
Zenkerella
Humboldtia
Hymenostegia
Leonardoxa
Amherstia
~1: · 21Diagram of relationships in the Detarieae sens. lat. after Bruneau et al. (2000; 2001); Gervais & Bruneau (2002); Fougere-Danezan et al. (2003);
rendeen et al. (2003a); Wieringa & Gervais (2003)
pan:dle l that of the (,"/edilsia clack~ of the Cacsalpinicae; Neoaj){f/o..\.y/u11 (not yet thicket, often on 1ive1• banks 01 on te1 mite mouncl.s
sampled in any molecula1 analysis) and 13randzeirr are from Madagascar, Schotit1 Rde1ence(s): Ross (1977: 25 -33): Estc1 huysc ( 199:1)
occur."i in south{.: Jn Af1il:a and Har11el~yde11dru11 ~111cl Go11 iorrlwcbis arc in the H yh1idisalion occur's between species in the E C 1pt: 1egion; thL: postions of
Neot1(1pics Sebo/la, !3c1rJ1ebyde1uho11 and c,'onirwrhacbis wit hin the 1csin-p1oducing Dc t;11icac
The fibrous hark is used frn rope and the tuhcrow; 10ot.s a1 e edihll" ;11c uncc..:1rn in ; SL'C t<1xo11omic notes undL'1 Neuajulloxyhm
Variou.o; .'ipecies (t1ec..: fuchsia , l)()er-lx::1 n , Arric..::111 \Valnut) ~11c LIS<.:cl as shade t1i.:cs
01 Ollli\lllentillS, browse for li vestock, tirnbe1 (fur nillllC, norn ing, wagons), cclihk
si.:ctls (a fte1 coo king), med icine, tann ins and dyL'S
Priorio c ,,
Oxystigma msaa Drawing by L. M. Ripley opa1,era Drawing by W. H. Fitch
JkJt..: 1cm·dsJ: Cu\v:tn ( l ~J7S I>); Cmv:1n .._\ lkrry in Bl'l'l'y t'/ rt!. ( J1J1)8: (vl-(17); l).11ilc-;
0:.: Hico ( l t)lJ<))
S1..·c: nut''·" undc:1 h'ffly/iet11/u111 Ste111011ocoleus 11 :11111s 1•Jos
Planted :is rnn;111K·nt:tls; .'ii:vc ul spi.:l' ics (wall:1h:1, ap:1, w.1m<11<1) a1 L' used 1"01 l .-.p.; \VC Af1·ic.1 (Jvrny Co;tsl , ( ;h;1n;1 1 Nig1.:1ia, C:1mc1oon, C:1bon :inc.I O ..·n!i;i]
ti1nlw1 in lu.::iv y to nst ru t't irm , 1oors (.-;hinglt:"). c1 1pc n11 y, j<iirn.:i y, fu1nilllrL: :iml Afr'ic..": m lh::pulilic)
~l!lClling; ro1 (i1 1.;worn l :ind d1;moal, :rntl rm n:"in ()I' w.il l;1b:1 oil (e.g.,"'" oh'!l;'l d l'rolll S(t!ll/UI/ ((;k ,: .'>!:imcn) <lllcl c;pfoo~ (Ck: .-.h1.:alliJ , Cor llie prolonged Sl:1111in:d
l>udu:) di sk to which lh12 fib11K 11l-; art; :ilt ;td1L'd
0
' [
0
/L'CS; !ropk:tl lowland r;till rrncsl
l kk:1L'11n.~(s): l,,l'.011<.1rd ( l tJ57: I 'iC1 - t 'i~); Auh 1t.'"vill..: l 1970: 17,f -l7(l)
l'l:lc.. ..:d in thi...: l1i..:t;11iL':1i...: se11x. strhl . l•hc.lc l1y B1urn..::1u l'I ol (2000) :111c1 sl!nngly
.-.upprntl'd a.-. si ...,lt..:1 to /wgulfrtrr/i(I h y Fm1gl'tl~ - n:111cz;m t'I a( (200.))
Sten w11rn. :11fv11s 111it:rt111tb11s 1 latms lahi:in:m:I) is llM.; d rm li111he1, JC.'iill :me.I
nh: dicint..:
Hymenaea L 1753
Guibourtia Benn. 1857
Pse11docopaiva Boitton & Wilson (1929)
'{iy1 by/v//111111Ilny nl!I 1827)
c. 14 spp.; Africa (Guinea-Congolean WC Africa 17 spp I: dryland S tropica l
14 •PP·' 1101l 11 S1\111,•1ir.n wlt l1 tl'.:nlf!S Jn A111no11in and coasml A1inn1 c forest (c
Zambezian (c. 3 spp.) and N tropical Sudanian (1 sp.) regions, and c. 2 spp. in
s pp.) nnd Lirylan I 1l 1n ' J! !31 .11.il (5 ~pp.; nc of whk ll c>.tcnds IO l':im11u11 y
"'P'"""
1111 tl Argl!lllln:t); I ~l'· wh.I In 1h • N1!1~ropic (c.<1e11Llini: to • Amcrk.1. the
Zanzibar-lnhambane E Africa), with a single neotropical species disjunct betwe en
Cuba and seasonally dry E llrazil, Paraguay and Bolivia
C:irlhhe:m um.I M,c.<1wl; I 'I" e ndemic ltl ub:i , '1 111L·d 10 n •in11lc spc<it:'S 111
Named fo1 Nicolas Jean BG . Guibou1t (1790-1867), Professor of Phaimacology
coaslal E Africa, Madagascar and 1he Mascarene Islands
Derived from Hymen, the Greek god of marriage, referring here to the twinned in Paris
Trees or sh111bs: tlopical lowland (some1imes swampy 01• seasonally inundated)
pair of leafle1s comprising each leaf
rain forest, seasonally chy forest, woodland, bushland and thicket, often along
Trees or shrubs: iropical riverine and inundated forest to seasonally dty forest,
rivers and on sandy soils
woodland, thorn forest, bushland and thicket, often on slopes
Reference(s): Leona1d 0950: 1957: 137-156): Boenan (1967: 136-138); Aubreville
llc fc1"'0Lc(.'I): Laogcnli ·im & Ll>c (\97·0 : I.cc l.•ni: •nh •11 11 Ci• 751
Modcra1cly "ell upporll!d as sl.,lc r 10 ,uf1J011rtla h l.lc remk-c n <'I <II. lll03a) (1970: 120-127): Lock (1989: 53-54); Barneby (1996: 182-183)
Moderately we ll supported as sister to Hymenaea by He1endeen et al. (2003a):
olthouj,111 :mn plini: lncu111pl<-'lc: Poillllr llll'J I I tlcscribc.."Cl n f0>:<il spc es t ll
see taxonomic notes under Hymenaea Barneby (1996) united a number of S
j/m/~rrt J•o lnllr), fl (llll th ' l10111111il.lll itc pul Jj wh ich h ' C( llsitfco'Cd ·loscJy
American species occupying discontinuous, seasonally dry distributions under che
resembled the African H. vern1cosa Gaertn
single species G bymenaeifo//a (Morie.)) .Leonard
0
Resin (referred to as S American or Zanzibar copal, depending on the species) is
used for incense, glue, varnish, shellac and as traditional medicines; other uses
Various species used for limber (bubinga, akume, ovangkol, hyedua), e.g. in high
quality furniture, cabinet work, joine ry, panelling, veneers, heavy caopentry,
include edible fruits, timber (algarrobo, jatoba, courbaoil, guapinoD for
consmoction, high quality furniture, cabinetry, veneers, joinery, panelling, turnery. implement handles, boat masts, for firewood and charcoal; gum-copal (for
incense, coating pills, varnishes, illuminants and mosquito repeJlents), medicine,
111u<lc11I instruments and boat building, the bark is used for canoes, and some
fish poisons and (in at least one species) edible seeds
species are cultivated as 0 1namentals
TRIBE DETARIEAE 81
80 LEGUMES OFTHE WORLD
Gllletlodendron p/e"eanum (1-4); G. mlldbraedll (5-6); G. klsantuense (7,8) Tessmannla macrontha, ined. Photograph by J. J. Wieringa Slndora cochlnchlnensls Photograph by L. Averyanov
Drawing by M. ·F. Adam
Tessmannia Hanns 1910
Hylodendron Taub. 1894 c 12 spp ; centred in WC Af1ica (c 7 spp. (Cameroon, Central African Republic,
I sp.; WC Af1 ica (Cameroon, Gabon, Congo (Kinshasa] and Nigeria) Equatorial Guinea, Congo (Biazzaville), Gabon, Congo (Kinshasa) and Angola]
From bylo- (Gk.: forest) and dendron (Gk.: tree), 1efeiring to the habit of the ancl 1 sp, in W Africa [Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast]); 2 spp. in Zambezian
species south tropical Africa (Tanzania, Zambia and Angola) and 2 spp in Zanzibar-
Trees; t1opical lowland rain forest Inhambane E Tanzania
Reference(s): Leonard 0957: 75 - 76); Aubreville (1970: 140 - 142) Named for G. Tessmann (jl. 1904-1926), German missionary, ethnographer and
Position unresolved within the Deta1·ieae sens strict. clade (Bruneau el al., 2001) botanical collector in Equatorial Guinea and Gabon
Used for timbe1 (carpentry, implements and construction), fuelwood and as a Trees; t1opical lowland min forest, seasonally dry forest and woodland
traditional medicine Reference(s): Leonard 0957: 66-72); Brenan 0967 : 106-108); Aubreville (1970:
155-161)
Placed in the Detarium clade sensu Fougere-Danezan et al. (2003) within the
Gilletiodendron Vermoesen 1923 Detarieae sens. strict clade; the south tropical and E African taxa are poorly
known; genus currently under revision
5 spp ; centred in WC Africa ( 4 spp. Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Centra l African
Used for copal (resin) and timber (carpentry, railway sleepers, tool handles, posts)
Republic, Equato1 ia I Guinea, Gabon, Congo (Kinshasa] and Angola); 1 sp. in Mali
Named for Abel Gillet (1857 - 1927), French botanist, and de11dro11 (Gk : tree)
Trees; t.ropical lowland Guineo-Congolian rain forest and Sudanian seasonally Sindora Miq. 1861
dry forest c. 18 - 20 spp.; SE Asia (most diverse in Malesia with c. 15 spp., 2 spp. e ndemic
Refe1ence(s): Leonard (1952b: 283 - 287; 1957: 61 - 66); Hutchinson & Dalziel
to lndo-China); WC Africa (a single species in Gabon)
(1958: 455); Aubreville 0970: 71 - 75)
From slndor, the Malay name for sever•! species of the genus
Position unresolved wilh in the Detarieae sens s/l"/cl. clade (Bruneau et al., 2001)
Trees; tropical lowland rain forest, seasonally dry forest and woodland, along
Used for reafforestat ion, timbe1 (house construc1ion) 1 1esin, edible seeds and
1ivers, in swamps, occasionally on hillsides, often on sandy soils
bee plants
Reference(s): De Wit 0949); Hou in Hou el al. 0996: 691 - 709)
Placed in the Detariurn clade sensu Fougere-Danezan el al, (2003) within the
Detarieae sens, strict. clade
Baikiaea Benth 1865 Various species are used for timber (supa, sepe tir, pctir) fo1 construction,
c. 6 spp ; centred in WC Africa (4 spp., Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, Congo furniture, joinery, veneer, plywood, flooring, ship building •nd utensils; also for
[Kinshasa] to Angola; B inslg11is Benth widespread in the Guineo-Congolian to medicine and oleo-resins (used in perfumes, for illuminacion, varnishes, paints,
Lake Victoria regions); 2 spp. in drier habitats, one in lowland E Tanzania , the transparent paper and for the adulteration of other oils)
other widespread in southern tiopical Africa
Named for Dr William Balfour Baikie (1827 - 1873), Royal Navy Surgeon, explorer
and missionary in West Africa Sindoropsis ) .Leonard 1957
Trees; tropical lowland rain forest, seasonally dry forest and woodland on well 1 sp; WC Africa (Gabon)
drained soilsi B plurijuga Harms forms near-monoclo1ninanl scands on the From opsis- (Gk.: appearance) and Sindora, for its resemblance to this closely
Kalahari sands of the Zambezi Basin related genus (although it differs in petal indumentllm, androecium structure and
Reference(s): Brummitt (1986: 61 - 73) fruit morphology)
Placed in the Detarium clade sensu Fougere-Danezan et al (2003) within the Trees; tropical lowland rain forest
Dernrieae sens. strict clade Reference(s): Leonard (1957: 81-84); Aubreville (1968: 171-174)
Used comme1 cially for timber, e g., B plurij11ga (Rhodesian teak, Za mbesi Placed in the Detarium clade by Fougere-Danezan et al. (2003) within the
redwood, utngllsi), maJnly for Roaring, furniture, c~binerry, veneer, turnery, Detarieae sens. strict. clade; first described in Data1twn and then Copaifera before
ca1ving and construction; also cultivated as an ornamencal (.Incl introduced in Asia being rJ.ised to generic rank
(B. lnslgnfs, or nkobakoba) Timber of S letes/111 (Pellegr.)] Leonard (gheombi) is used for furniture, flooring,
Sindoron I I
,.s s etestu/ Drawing by M. -F. Adam joinery, veneers, boxes and crates
Balklaea plurljuga Photograph by G. R. Nichols
rem~ining species are also rare 01 endange1ed Hefei·e nce(s} Leornucl (1957, 96 - 97): At1b1~ville (1970, 86 - 88)
Not yet sampled fo1 n10lecula1• analysis but con~ide1ecl to be closely allied to
Scorudopbloeus and Scholia (Leonard, 1957)
Scorodophloeus Haims 1901
2 spp.; \VC Af1ica (1 ~p. in C1mei-oon, Gabon, Congo [Kinshasa] and Angola; l sp.
in Kenya ~incl Tttnzani~1)
From scorodo· (G k., g;ulic) :incl pbloeo (Gk' ba1 kl, for the ba1k which emits"
garlic-like odou r
T1 eesi tiopical lowland rain forest and seasonally dry foiest, scr ub forest and
wooded grassland, often along 1iver bank:.;
Refe1 ence(s): Brenan 0967, 122-124); Aubreville (1970: 83 - 86)
Considered a llied 10 Schol/a and Hymenoslegia by Leonard (1957, 102-104).
[Auth01,'s postscript: Lock (.submitted) describes <1 new species of Scorodupb/ol!llS
f1 o m coastal fo1est ;:111d thicket in C to N Mozambique]
'rhu lxtrk and le r\. CS f'mm wh d i ~~sc u tial u ll' •ne :1lso exti ;H.lt'tl) :.uc ll \l.1..1 a.s ' 1
su l1sdt111c fo r ).llJ rhc te.;1., S. re11korl I Jorms ih umh" IJ: timber <II' .j'ls<:liurl (J'auliJ
LMR
J.1.Corrarcl (m):todonlil, mm1nd ··) is u:st:e l for rm1).lh f.=onstru ctlnn 1 l'intw·o1x l ;111d tool
handles; the tr~e is used fo r shade and bee forage
Lebrun/0 d
endron leptonthum Drawing by G. Chypre
Scorodoph/oeus fischerl Drawing by L. M. Ripley
TRIBE DETARIEAE 89
88 LEGUMES OFTHE WORLD
~·
rr- ,·
o-
.j
r-- '
Tamarindus indica Drawing by l. M. Ripley Tamarindus lndica Photograph by G. P. Lewis lntsia bijuga Drawing by l. M. Ripley Afzelia quanzenzis Photograph by G. R. Nichols
Afzella quan .
lntsia bijuga Photograph by D. Du Puy zens1s Photograph by J. Dransfield
Ecuadend
Hymenostegla f/orlbundo (1-3); H. normandii (4- 6) Drawing byG. Chypre ron acosta-solisianum Drawing by J. Myers
Elizabeth 0
Paloveops/s emarglnata Drawing by P. Halliday cocclnea va r. oxyphylla Photograph by G. P. Lewis
TRIBE DETARIEAE 97
96 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Macro/obium unijugum Photograph by T. D. Pennington Macrolobium latifo/ium Photograph bys. A. Mori
Brownea macrophylla Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Macro/obiu .. .
m acac1ifo/1um Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Browneopsis disepala Photograph by 8. 8. Klitgaard
TRIBE DETARIEAE 99
98 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Cryptosepalum sp. Photograph by/. Anton-Smith Dlcymbe a/stonii Photograph by L. Y. Th. Westra Dlcymbe hymenaea Drawing by B. Angell
Paramacrolobium coeruleum Drawing by l. M. Ripley
00 1 sp: WC Afri ca (Sic1r.1 ~one and Guinea to Congo, C:1me1oon , Ccnt~d Afiic111
llepuhlic.:, Congo lKinsha.sa] and Angola) and disjum:t lo E Af1i t::.1 (lmvh1ml E
Kenya and E Tanzanic1)
From para- (Gk.: beside) ;111d lv!acru/obi11111, •1flc1 the genus f10111 which ii w.L,
scg1 eg:ited
Dicy111ho/Jsis Ducke tl950)
16-20 spp; S Ame1ica ( most
!..'.
Brazi l .inti Guyan;.i)
divcrn~ ill Amazoni;111 VenezueJ.1 to Colombic1,
T 1ecs; uopirnl lowland 1<.1i n forest uswil ly ~d ong rivc 1." and in inundated pl~1ccs to Tiecs; often nmnmlumin;rnl in uopic;ll lowlancl r;1in fore.st, g<il le ry forest , in
seasonally d1y wcHJcllancl and woocl ed g1assl<1nd in 1ipa1ian vegetation
valleys and (1;_11ely) un 1ocky slopes
Refe1cncc\sl: ll1e11<111 ( 1%7: l 'i5-1 57) Rere1ence(s): IJucke ( 19'i0); Cowan ( 1957; 1961); llarncby 0990); Cow"n & lk 11 y
Scg1egated f1o m M({crulvbirtm by Ll'onaicl ( 1954); 1cccn t cvidc 1Ke sugges ts~' in llc 1ry et al (1998: 'i6-5H)
close affi nity with CJ:)'jJ/osepalum (B runeau el ell., 2001; Jlc 1cnclcc n el a l , 2003:1) G~nc 1 'ic affinities ;ue unclear, but p o.s.s ih ly assuci<tl ccl w ith Pol)!s/emo11f/Jllb11s
Parm1wcrolu/Ji11111 coc:r11/e11m Cfi1u b) J L0011a1d (sa -gbcmbe) is tiscd for ti mbc 1 (Bru neau el al, 200 1) Ma ny specie.'i a1e 1:1re, known o nl y f10 ;11 the typ e co llection
(1a il way sleepe1s, ru1 nitl11c, e<upen t ry and gongs) and shade t1ccs; the seeds <llL' or· <1 hanclful of g~1t h e1 ings, an d JJicym/Jo/JSL\· may he disti n ct
Usecl fot timhei
used ;.is cm11lte1s in games
S.R-C.
--
2001) but genetic affiniti es remain um::Je;11
Va1 ious sp~dcs used frn timhet (mbarik~1 , mtonclo, ;_1bogo, dolrn) , e,g, fo 1 hc:tVY fumitun::, c;1q1cnlly, juine1y, p<tndling and tlcx)Jing; also us~cl ti.>1 fibre (1oofi11g, lm~es
/ulbernardia b / ·
conslruction ancl 11001 ing; also used for medicine <mcl human food (leaves) r ey1 Photograph by/. J. Wieringa and ba11ds), fin:wo<xl, cha1 coal, dyes, ;1s OJ namentals, bee plants and medicine
Jsoberlinio angolensis var. losioco/yx Drawing by L. M. Ripley
lcur/o dun •
Tetrober/lnio po/yphy/lo Drawing by J. Sausotte·Guerel ensis Drawing by W. Wessel
Tribe cassieae Bronn 1822, emend. Irwin & Barneby (1981, and formally in 1982)
Tribe Poeppigieae Britton & Rose (1930)
Trib Cassie.ie, long ·onsid red to b an artill iaJ Ceratonia is clearly distinct from all other Cassieae.
group, w:is divided l Y__Irwln & B:i rn. I . 1 9~1 ..into The analysis of Bruneau et al. (2001) supported earlier
fiv sul tribes ( ratonunae [m nogenen J, Dt:1. lu rn1e studies (Doyle et al. , 1997, Kajita et al. , 2001) in finding
(1 3 gen •ra l Du parqueri inae [monogen rid, Cassii nae that subtribe Cassiinae was not monophyletic, although
[3 gen ra I, and 1.abi ·he inae [2 rcneral). They sta t cl the exact relationship between the three genera,
that tlvy wou ld have u ore! cl criba l rank to the five Cassia, Senna, and Chamaecrista differed. Herendeen
subtribes if they had not been dissuaded by others. et al. (2003a), in a combined molecular-morphological
The 20 genera of tribe Cassieae sensu Irwin & analysis which expanded on the study of Bruneau et
Barneby (1981) remained unchanged in Polhill 0994). al. (2001), found strong support for a Dialiinae sens.
Since then, Uittienia has been reinstated as a lat. clade with Labicheinae nested within it, and
monospecific genus in subtribe Dialiinae (Rojo, 1982) including Poeppigia from the Caesalpinieae which
and this was followed by Hou in Flora Malesiana grouped with Madagascan Baudouinia. The single
(Hou et al., 1996). species of Dicorynia sampled, D. guianensis Amshoff,
In the rbcl phylogeny of Doyle et al. 0997) the nested within a clade of six Dialium species. Ceratonia
Cassieae (represented by 6 genera) is not monophyletic. grouped with Acrocarpus, with Tetrapterocarpon sister
In addition, Cassia did not group with Senna or to these two, confirming the isolated position of
Chamaecrista, and Ceratonia grouped with Ceratonia in the Cassieae. Cassia did not group with
Gymnocladus (traditionally placed in tribe Senna or Chamaecrista; neotropical, monospecific
Caesalpinieae). Kajita et al. (2001) similarly found the Pterogyne, traditionally placed in its own generic group
Cassieae not to be monophyletic, with 4 genera of in tribe Caesalpinieae, was sister to the Chamaecrista-
Cassieae interspersed amongst genera of tribe Senna clade, a relationship worthy of further study. In
Caesalpinieae, and a well-supported clade composed the study by Herendeen et al. (2003b), Cassia, Senna
of Zenia, Apuleia (subtribe Dialiinae) and Petalostylis and Chamaecrista do form a clade, with Chamaecrista
(subtribe Labicheinae) basally branching to the rest of sister to the other two genera. These authors also found
the legumes except for tribe Cercideae. Chamaecrista a moderately well supported Umtiza clade which is
grouped with Senna (except for Senna alexandrina basally branching in the Caesalpinieae sens. lat. (see
Mill., represented in the Kajita et al. study by its page 129), comprising the genera Umtiza, Gleditsia,
synonym Cassia senna L.), and Ceratonia grouped Gymnocladus, Ceratonia, Acrocarpus, Arcoa and
with Acrocarpus of tribe Caesalpinieae (a relationship Tetrapterocarpon.
also supported by the analysis of Doyle et al., 2000). Five genera of Cassieae have not yet been included
The molecular phylogeny of Bruneau et al. (2001) in any published molecular studies: Androcalymma,
largely supports the monophyly of the subtribes of Eligmocarpus, Kalappia , Mendoravia, and Uittienia.
Irwin & Barneby (1981) but not of tribe Cassieae . Koeppen & Iltis (1962) remarked on the absence of
1-J ev r, the Dialiinae are monopltyletic only if the silica in the woods of Martiodendron and
bigencric Australian subtrib 1.abich •inac is included; Androcalymma, a character that differentiated them
Labichea and Petalostylis grouping with the from the highly siliceous woods of Apuleia, many
Australasian Storckiella. The monospecific neotropical (non-Asiatic) Dialium species, and Dicorynia
genus Poeppigia, sole member of its generic group in (Koeppen, 1980). They also commented that sclerotic
tribe Caesalpinieae, occurs as sister to the Dialiinae parenchyma cells, rare in the Leguminosae, are found
~ens. lat. clade (the two share cym< se inflorescences) in Martiodendron and Androcalymma, further
m the Bruneau et al. (2001) analysis. The same analysis evidence linking these two genera .
sugg Sled thaL Ceratonia has a close relationship with The Cassieae as presented here (Fig. 22), containing
A.er wpus . upport:ing th fin ling. f Doy! el al., 21 genera and (729)-732-(735) species, is retained
2?00 :'Ind I jita •/ al., 2001) anc.I tJ1e Maclagas ·an gen us largely in the traditional sense of Irwin & Barneby
7etrciptcrocarpon tra liti na !J y pla eel in the (1981) and Polhill 0994), a lthough the tribe is
Dim rpllandrn gro u p >f t ribe Cae al plni a undoubtedly an assemblage of unrelated taxa which in
LEFTS
enna leandrll Photograph by D. Du Puy
Poeppigia
Baudouinia
?Eligmocarpus
?Mendoravia
(")
)>
Distemonanthus (./')
* Apuleia (./')
rn
)>
Storckiella
rn
Labichea Cassieae:
Petalostylis Labicheinae 0
)>
r
Koompassia
Duparquetia orchidacea Drawing by N. Halle Duparquetla orchldacea Ph otograph by D. Kirkup
Martiodendron
?Androcalymma Duparquetia na;11. rno5
Ol igvsle111 011 13cnt h (1 865), no n Tu rcz (1858)
1 .'ip ,; en d em ic to \VC Afric;1 (Liberi a to the lower Co ngo D;.1sin)
?Kalappia Named fo 1 the Revere nd PVA Duparqu et 0830 - 1888) w ho collected pla nts in
P1e nch Equato l'ial Af1 ica (as it wa s then kn o wn ) bt.::tween 1863 and 1887
Scandent 01 sa 1mentose sh1uhs, robust lianas (' hush 1opcs ') 01 (less fi equently)
Zenia small t1ees; evergree n fou~st especi all y ne;,11 1ivcrs, seco nda ry fo 1est, .sc1L1bl<1 ncl,
w:1ste g1 ou ncl and coastal wooded grn:-;sland
llcfc 1c 11cc(s): Aubrcville 0968: 47 - 49; 1970: 47 - 49)
Pla ced in th e 111o noge11e1 ic su bt1ibc Dupa1 q ueriinae by I1 w in & 13arneby (198 1)
?Uittienia
although they had 01 iginally inlenclecl lo est;,1b lish ~1 sepa1ate ll ibe to
Dialium <1cco111 m odate the ge nus, q uoti ng Bcnrlrn m - w ho ( in 1865) clescii becl it (under
Dicorynia Oligosfemun ) - 11s "pe1fectly i:-;ola ted, combini ng cl1e1racte1s of very cli ff<:! 1Cnt
11ihes" D11parq11elic1 orcbidt1cea Dc1i ll hc1s no parclllcl in the C~1 esalp in io i de:ic:;
esp ecially notewo1thy are its zygo mo1phic oichid-like ~l owe 1 s, the syn and li t1m of
4 -5 anther.s, th e cbstically clehiscent pocl ancl the cliporate pollen. In the
co1nbinecl 111olecul<1r-morpho logic;1l analys is of He 1en decn et al (2003;:1),
Papitionoideae DHpt1rquelia i.11 pl:tt:cd in an isolated b;;1s;ill y br:inch ing posit io n siste1 to the 1est
o f the Legt1111ino.sclt.:! (above tribes Ce rcidcac and Deta ricac sens lat ), suggesti ng,
at lea.st, th at scp<ll <JlC ti ibal St<ltus might be justi fied fo1 D11jJarq11elia
It h::is potential :as an rn•namental due to i[s sh o wy white and pinkish 1ed nowers;
Caesalpinieae pro parte (see page 127) the sinuous stems a1e used :.is ties 0 1 m ace1c1tecl and p u t into palm-wine to
at:t:de1ate fe1men t<-1tio n; the f1uits mi xed wit h tobacco serve <IS a snu ff; also used
as ;1 tr1.1clit imuil medicine
Chamaecrista
Senna Cassieae: Cassiinae
Poeppigia c P1esl 1830
1 ."ip,; N eot1of)it:s (Mexi co, C Ame1ica [H o nclu1as, G uatemala, El Salvaclo1J, Ct1 ba ,
Cassia Venezuele1, Colo m bia, Peru, l \olivia, ci1t: um-Amazo ni<1n Dr:.1zil (inclt1 clin g Acre,
llonc16nia, M ato G 1osso, M inas Ge1;:1is, Bahia, Pernam buco •rn d Piau f])
Named frn Eclt1ard F1ied1ich Poeppig C1798-JH68), Geiman botanist, zool ogist and
cx plo rc1 who t1 avellecl \Viclely in Latin Americ;.1; P1ofessor :a t the University of Leipzig
Caesalpinieae pro parte (see page 129) T1ees; seasonally cl1y Lm pirn l foiest ( includi ng caatin g:.1)
Mimosoideae Refc1ence(s): McVm1gh (1987: 73-75)
In Pol hill & Vidal 0981 ), PoejJjJigia was p laced as sol e 111embe1 of its gene1 ic
g1oup in t1ibe C 1esalpinieae, ;1 position 1ett1ined in Polhill (1994) . In the moleculai
;.111al ysis of 131unc au el al. (200 1) the genus is siste1 • to th <:: Dialiinae sen s lat clacle ,
? =placement uncertain due to lack of molecu lar data an d in th e comb ined molecul<u -mrnpho logicc1l an alys is of H e1endeen el al
* =position weakly supported (2003.i) it is nested wit hin the .s;.1111e clade (m~ m be rs sha1c cy mose innrnescences)
;Js si.s ter to Madagasca n 1Jmulo11 i11ia Removal f1 o m tri be Caesalp iniec1e to tlibe
Cassicc.1c (."iuht1ihe Dialiinac) is a logical co nclusion of the 131uneau el al ;1ncl
H erendeen el al ~ tuclies
-------
Poeppigia procera CJ)rc sl (tasa~I) is locall y used for const1l1cti o n timbe1, focwoucl
FIG. 22 Diagram of relationships between genera of Cassieae largely based on Herendeen et al. (2003a) Poepp; ·
gia procera Photograph by G. P. Lewis cmcl medici ne
<ind renrn1 kable tightly fo lded pods. As yet not induc.lcd in any published Paraguay, Bolivia ;ind A 1gentina, l sp endemic to Cea1·<'1 in NE Brnzil
Named frn Lucius Aruleus (124-c. 170 AD), Pl:tlonic philosopher and autho1·
mo\ccuh11· ana lyses
1ernembe1ecl for '111e Golden Ass, a p1osc n<111ativc
Ttces; in a w ide range of tropical and subttopical h:1bitat.s, ft om rain frnest, 1ive1inc
and g:tllery forest to seasonally d1y fnreM ;111d thom-sc1uh woocll:ind (caatinga)
Jtde1ence(s} Koeppen 0978); Fernandes (1~)9t,, 284-287)
A memlx:1 of suht1ibe Dialiinac; in the 111olcc.:ula1 analysis of Kajita el al, (2001),
Apuleia is sister to a Pelaloslyfis-Zeuia dad<:: ~ind Diali11m is sister to these th1cc ,
\'\food ::111atomy suggests a rclarionsllip wi1h /Jislemonmtlb us (Koeppen, 1978)
The timhe1 o/ II /eiucmJHt (Vogel) .J ~f.Macbr (gi·:ipia, gat'a pa, yvy1a f)l'Je), is usL!cl
Eligmocarpus cynametroides Drawing by M. Tebbs Apu/eia leiocarpa Photograph by G. P. Lewis <.:olllllH:.: 1'cially for~ e g,, high quality furniture, hctivy const1uction and flooring
----~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~o ~
...;lopes and 1ivcr valleys, l sp occasionally in peal <.tncl f1esb watc1 sw~1mps
Heference(s): Larsen el al. (1984, 83-85); Hou in !lou el al. (1996: 631-63'i)
Phicecl in suhtribc Dialiin;1e; grouping with Morliode1fd1'f.m (f10111 S Ame1ica) in
the <.:ombined molccular-mo1phologic:al an;dysis o[ J-le1enclcen el al. (2UU3a), and
,,{;
.,
t/6 C1 lmlh :11e sister to a JJia/i11111-Dicrn:y11ia clad~ . /\ £'.\-celso (Lk'cc.) Tauh cm :lltain a
height of 75 (- 88) 111
Va1 ious specil~s (kL'rnpas, Lu:tlang, mengris, ta pang) usecl ror timhe1· with a wide
;11 ray of uses, e g, cthinet making, jc>inery, venee1s, boat-builcling, fl(H>I ing,
pa11elling 1 railway slecper.s 1 plywoocl , ch:1rco;d :111d fence post.'i; also as bee forage
Koompa .
Storckiel/a pancheri Drawing by C. A. Sobel ss1a ma/accensis Drawing by w. H. Fitch (for honey)
the Leguminosae) and lack of silica in the wood indicates a close 1elationship boa1ds ancl stiles
with the Amazonian ilndrocalymma (Koeppen & !ltis, 1962; Koeppen, 1963) ln
the combined molecular-morphological analysis of He1encleen et al. (2003a)
klarlioclelldrml groups with M~ilesian Koompassia, the rwu sisrer to a chide Zenia Chun 1946
conta in ing Zenia, DiC1lium and Dic01ynia 1 .o;p. ; endemic to S China and N Vietnam
Named fo1 l-1 C Zen, executive se<.:1et<1ry of rhe C him1 Foundation f01 the
promotion of education and culture
Androcalymma Dwye r 1957 Trees; uopical forest, 1ocky hi lls in forested ravines, 200- 750 m
1 s p. ~ endemic to th e Lip per Am~1zon lla.<>in in l3m zil l!efe1ence(s): Chun (1946); ulfsen el al (1980: 11 2- 113)
F1om a11dro- (G k: m;in ) and ca~wnnw (Gk : a cowl oi coveli ng), alludi ng to the A poorly known and little-colle<.:ted red-flowe1ecl .o.; pecies . In the molectli<1r
anthers, which are turned inward over the style; when deflexed they 1esemble a :tlla lysis of KajiL<1 el al. (2001) there is 100% suppott for a 1elationship between
pulled-down hood Zenia and Peta/uslylr\· f10111 Australia, with Apuleia f1om S Ame1ica weakly
T1ees; tropic.ii Amazonian terra firme rain forest supported as siste1 to these two. In the combined morphological and moleclllar
Refe1ence(s): Dwye1 C1957b); Koeppen 0963) amtlysis of Herendeen et al, (2003a), Zenia is s istc1 to a Dialium-Dicotynia clade
A ra1e\y collected genus in subtribe Dialiinae, <IS yet unknown in f1uit and noL of s ubt1ibe Dialiinae sens. /al, which in their study includes Pelalostylis
included in :my molecula1 ::maly.ses Sclerotic pa1end1ym:-1, uncommon in Zenic1 insignis Chun yields a high quality l'imbe 1 used for ca1pent1y, but the
leguminous wood, is found in thi.s genus and in Martiodc:11dro11, also in the supply is too small to be of any com111e1cial value; of omamental potential ;ind
Dialiin;ie (Koeppen & lltis, 1962) Dwyer Cl957b) states that seve1a l flor.J! c ultivated in Hawaii
chmacters suggest a relations hip with Dicvrynia and Marliudemlron (;is
Marliusia ); Koeppen (1963) also comments that several featurc:.s of the flowers
s uggest :1 possible lillk with Apuleia Dt'.cu1y11ia ~incl Ajm/eia, however, have
Uittienia Steenis 1948
highly siliceo us woods while A 11drocalymma and Mw1iode11d1011 do not
Dia/i11111 subgemis Uillie11/a (Stce nis) Steyae1t 0953)
I .'ip; W Ma lesia: Slltnat1a and Borneo (Sahah ;;incl I<a linrnntan)
(Koepren & lltis, 1962; Koeppen, 1963)
N<1 mecl fo 1 the Dutch botanist Hendiik Uittien (1898-1944) who actively engaged
in rhe undergrmind movement ag~1inst rhe Ge 1mall occupation during the Second
\'Vrn Id War; he was executed in 1944
T1ees; t1opiGd iain fo1est
ReJ'e1ence(s): Hm1 in Hou el al. 0996: 714-716)
Rojo ( 1982) reinstated Uillie11ia as a monos pecific genus in subtribe Dialiinac,
rejecting it from Dic1/i1tm largely because uf a distinctive fruit type (this i.s not
supprnted by wood anatomy [Koep pen, 1980] as Uilllent'.a and Asian species of
Dia/ium both lack silica accumul:.1tioll); a.s yet not included in molecular analysis
T imber used in construction
Ulttien/a modesta Os
Androcalymma glabrlfolia Drawing by P. Halliday Drawing by}. H. van
(•)
Dialium orientate Drawing by L. M. Ripley Dia/ium guianense Photograph by 5. A Mori D/carynia guianensis Photograph by 5. A Mori Dicorynia guianensis Photograph by 5. A. Mori
Dia/ium madagascariense (A-J); D. unifo/iolatum (K-M) Drawing by M. Tebbs Dicorynia guianensis Photograph by 5. A. Mori
Cassia L. 1753
c 30 spp; circumtropical; 12 - 13 spp . nat ive in the Amelicas (mostly of the Am:1 zon
Basin bur l sp. endemic to Mexico, 2 in SE I31 azil , I in NE Bmzil and 2 w idesp1cad
o n eilher side of the P:rnanrn isth mus, indt1ding in the Ant illes), 10 spp. native in
Af1irn S of the Sa hara (2 spp. in Gu inea-Congolian, 2 spp. in Suda nian, 2 spp in
Zanzibar-Inhambane and 4 spp. more widespread in Z<rn1 bezian, Somalia-Masai and
Z:rnzibar-lnhamb•rne reg ions, one extending into Madagascar); 1 sp endemic in
Mad<.1gasc;11•; 1 sr. endemic to Myanmar [I3u1 ma) and Tha iland; 3 spp. native to
Indi a, S1i L:mka and SE Asia a1e widely cultivated th1ougho ut the tropics and
subtiopics; 2 spp. endemic in Australia (Queensland and New South Wales)
Derived f1om the ancient Greek n<1me casia fo1 an aromatic and fi.1grant plant; the
type species, C.fis/11/a L (purging cassia , Indi;.m lc1buinu111 OI golden showei), has
~1 long his101y of he1bal use, the pith of its lol"'lg, woody pods yielding a rurgativt:
medici ne; not to be co nfused with the true 'ca.s.sb' of co mme1ce wh ich is
Cimwmomum aromalic11m Nees (L:rn 1aceal!), although Linn~1eus used 'cassi a' in
the gene1 ic sense to inclt1cle various plants wi th similar medicinal uses
Trees and arbort:scent shrnhsi tropical in 1.1 w ide range of habitats including 1~1in
fo 1e.')I (Ol"'I re1ra fi1m e), 1ive1ine and g;.iJJe1y frne.st (includ ing nooded tive1i>anks
'ind v;.lr7.e:1), se~1 so nally d ry forest, woodland, wooded g1asslancl (s<1v;.rnm1 and
cem1clo), d1y sc1t1b, th ickets ~in d co;..1st::1 I eve1green bushlcrnd
Heferencel,): !1wi11 & llaine by 0982: 4-63); Lock (1988, 1989: 27-29); La1sen &
Hou in Hou el al 0996: 556 -565); Rande ll & Barlow 0998<1); Du Puy in Du l'uy
et al, (2002: 74 - 78)
Prio1 to the seminal w01ks of Ilwin & Barneby (1981; 1982) most Floras ti eared
Cassia in its bwadest .sense to include Se1111a and Cbamaecrisla ; these three
gene1:-1 a1c now l:.irgely accepted and togethe1 make up subtribe Cassiinae (Irwin
& l3arnehy 1981; 1982) Cassia differs from the othe1 two genera pl'incipally in
stamen organ isation 131uneau et al, (2001 ) found t h~lt th e th1 ce gene1;.1 did not
fo 1m a c.:lade, Senna ,wouping w ith Cassia, while CJwmaecrista wa.s isolated In
the combined molectliar-11101phological an alysis o f Herendeen et al (2003;;1),
Cbamaec ,.isla 1e.'iolvecl as sistet to a claclc of Senna species wh ile Cassia gra11dis
L. w:is b<Asally b 1anching to a l<irge Cae.')<ilp in ieae-Mimosoideae clacle in a posiLion
isolated f10111 the Semw -Cbamaecrisla cl ade (i e., ag1edng w ith the findings nl
Doyle et al., 1997 and Kajita el al. , 2001). More 1ccently in He1enc\een el al_
(2003b) rh e three gene1;.1 frn1 11 a clacl e, w ith Cbamaecrista si.')ter to the orhe1 LWO
(mrne in line with m01pho logy ~in cl noclulat ion data)
Pou r sp ecies o f Cassia are widely cultive1ted as 0111<.1men1als throughout th e tio p icS
and sl1bt1 opic'i: C j/slula, C. ~rmulis, C.jaum1.ica L and C. 1·u:dmrgbii DC.; nwny
species have numel'Ous medicinal u.ses (e g., C. sleberimw DC, m; laxatives and
purgatives) ; C', arereh Dclilc is used as a fish stupifi e r; in Malaya C fistula was
once u.sed as a fraudul en t substitute for opium, C r oxbw]Sbii and C. sie/Jeria11a
ha ve w oods used w idely fo1 turne1y, ca1pent1y , cahinet1y, tool handles, pcstk.'i
and mrnt<ll S 80 udouini fl ugge1.,.1orm1s.
Cossio /ovonlco Photograph by H. o. c. de Wit o Photograph by D. Du Puy
caesalpinieae byG.P.Lewis
Polhill & Vidal 0981) divided the Caesalpinieae into 8 Peltophorum group, and the Dimorphandra group was
informal generic groups: the Gleditsia group (2 clearly shown to be a diverse assemblage of genera,
genera), the Acrocarpus group (munog neric), the many of which share certain characteristics with the
Sclerolobium group (3 genera), the P Jr ph rum group Mimosoideae, specifically with members of tribe
(13 genera), the Caesalpinia group 06 genera), the Mimoseae (Bruneau et al., 2001). Erythrophleum was
Poeppigia and Pterogyne groups (both monogeneric) sister to a clade that comprised the majority of the
and the Dimorphandra group (10 genera) . They Mimosoideae sampled, and Pachyelasma was sister to
commented that the tribe is "a remarkable mixture of the two mimosoid genera Pentaclethra and Catpocalyx.
relics and complexes of relatively recent speciation, Herendeen et al. (2003a) in a combined molecular-
providing many pitfalls for formal systematics and morphological analysis which expanded on the study
biogeographical interpretations" . Polhill 0994) added of Bruneau et al. (2001), presented an 'Umtiza clade'
a ninth informal group, the monogeneric containing Gymnocladus and Gleditsia (the two
Orphanodendron group, and placed Cordeauxia as a members of Polhill and Vidal's Gleditsia Group),
synonym of Stuhlmannia (both genera recognised in Umtiza (traditionally included in tribe Detarieae),
the present treatment) so that the total of 47 genera in Tetrapterocarpon (from the Dimorphandra Group),
the tribe remained unchanged . Within the tribe , Acrocarpus (the sole genus of the Acrocarpus Group),
Parkinsonia (including Cercidium) , Conzattia and and Ceratonia (from subtribe Ceratoniinae in tribe
Lemuropisum were moved from the Caesalpinia group Cassi~ae) . This new generic grouping raises some
to the Peltophorum group (Polhill, 1994) in agreement fascinating phytogeographical questions (see Schrire
with the subsequently published works of Lewis & et al., pages 21-54, this volume). Pterogyne resolved as
Schrire 0995) and Du Puy et al. Cl995b). sister to a Chamaecrista-Senna clade (of tribe Cassieae)
Since 1994 several studies have cast new light on a relationship worthy of further study; Batesia and
intergeneric relationships within the Caesalpinieae, Vouacapoua again fell outside the core-Peltophorum
necessitating the restructuring of some of the nine group; Dimorphandra grouped with Mora as sister to
informal generic groups presented by Polhill 0994). As all Mimosoideae, and Pachyelasma grouped with
pointed out in the introduction to tribe Cassieae, the Erythrophleum as sister to the Dimorphandra-
genus Ceratonia has been removed from that tribe to Mimosoideae clade. In the phylogenetic investigation
the Caesalpinieae, and Poeppigia has been removed of Haston et al. (2003), the Peltophorum group of
from the Caesalpinieae to the Cassieae (for further Polhill (1994) was non-monophyletic but there was
detail see discussion under each genus). In the rbcL support for a core-Peltophorum group comprising
phylogeny of Doyle et al. (1997) the Caesalpinieae, as Peltophorum, Parkinsonia, Schizolobium, Conzattia,
traditionally circumscribed, was shown to be Delonix, Lemuropisum, Colvillea and Bussea. Pterogyne
paraphyletic with members scattered throughout a resolved as sister to a clade containing Haematoxylum
clade which also included genera of the Cassieae and and Cordeauxia (both of the Caesalpinia group), thus
one mimosoid genus. The molecular analysis of Kajita supporting the earlier findings of Bruneau et al. (2001)
et al. (2001) also found the Caesalpinieae to be non- rather than those of Herendeen et al. (2003a). Haston
monophyletic. In the molecular analysis of Bruneau et al. (submitted) have further refined the relationships
et al. 2001 om or tb in ~ rmal g ~n ric groups of of the non core-Peltophorum group genera. They place
Polh11l CJC 4) w r suppo rted as 111 mo phyletic I ul the Arapatiella and jacqueshuberia with Tachigali in a
tr ib~ as a who le wa clearl y d t:! mon. tral d to be newly defined Tachigali group and find strong
Par:1 phy lcti . With regard to lnterg n ri relation.ship!>, molecular support for associating Batesia with
PteroJ{YIU! rcsolv ~d as ·istcr tu a aesa lpi.ni·1 group Recordoxylon and Melanoxylon in a new Batesia group.
clad '; /Jatesia and 011.acctpoua fe ll outside a core- Moldenhawera is placed in its own monogeneric
---
was added to the group of genera in that clade. Colombia, but is, as yet, und scribed [Cogollo Pach co Gymnocladus
Without do ubt , the genus w ith the greatest pers. comm., 2002]) . A n w g nus, tentatively n ru ci Gleditsia
taxonomic and nomenclatu ral complexity within the as Heterqfl.orwn by Sousa & Delgado 0993), but not Umtiza
yet formally published, is a monospecific Mexican Tetrapterocarpon Umtiza clade
Caesalpinieae is the type genus Caesalpiizia , which in
endemic closely related to Conzattia. It is not dealt Arco a
its broadest se nse comprises c. 140 spp. and contains
25 generic names in synonymy. Of these 140 species, with here . The informal ge neric groups of tribe =-- Acrocarpus
Ceratonia
12 -15 predominantly Asian taxa have still to be Caesalpinieae presented by Polhill & Vidal 0981) and
inc lu ded in molecular studies and cannot yet be Polhill (1994) are retained in part in Fig. 23 which
accompanies this treatment, but there are some Cassi eae: Cassiinae
assigned to any generic segregate recognised in this
(seep age 112)
treatment (see notes under Caesalpinia L.). Studies by noteworthy exceptions. The Gleditsia and Acrocarpus
Lewis & Schrire 0995), Simpson & Miao (1997), Lewis groups are both subsumed into the 'Umtiza clacle';
(1998), Simpson (1998, 1999), Simpson & Lewis (2003) Dip~ychandra is rejected from the Sclerolobium group Pterogyne Pterogyne group
and Simpson et al. (2003), have clearly demonstrated which now becomes the Tachiga li group and includes
that Caesalpinia, as traditionally circumscribed, is Arapatiella andjacqueshuberia; Poeppigia is moved to
Haematoxylum; Cordea uxia; Stuhlmannia;
polyphyletic . In this treatment Hof(mannseggia is the Cassieae ; several genera are removed from the Mezoneuron; Pterolobi um; Tara; Coulteria;
recognised as distinct following Simpson & Miao Peltophorum group leaving a core of nine related """" Caesalpinia; Pomaria; Erythrostemon;
(1997) , Simpson 0999) and Uli barri (1979, 1996);
Pomaria is also segregated from Caesalpinia sens. lat.
gene ra (if Heterqfl.ontm is included); Batesia, together
with Recordoxylon and Melanoxylon constitutes a new L Poincianella; Cenostigm a; Guilandina
l~
Caesalpinia group
following Simpson (1998) and Simpson & Lewis (2003). Batesia group based on the work of Haston el al.
Libidibia; Stahlia; Hoffmannseggia;
The genera Cou.lteria, Etythrostemon, Guilandina, (submitted). Moldenbawera is placed in its own group
Stenodrepanum; Zucca gnia;
Lihidihia, Mezoneuron , Poincianella and Tara are also as its generic relationships are currently unclear Lophocarpinia; Balsam ocarpon; Moullava
reinstated following the findings of Lewis & Schrire (Haston et al., submitted) . The Caesalpinia group
0995), Lewis 0998), Simpson et al. (2003), Lewis & increases in size from 12 to 21 genera. Five genera :ire
Bruneau (unpublished) , Lewis & Lavin (unpublished) currently too poorly known for them to be placed wi th Batesia
and Sotoyo (unpublished). Caesalpinia sens. strict. is, confidence: Campsiandra, Chidlowia , Dipzychandra, Recordoxylon Batesia group
Orphanodendron and Vouacapoua. Melanoxylon
in consequence, reclucecl to a genus of 25 species.
Tachigali
Arapatiella Tachigali group
Jacqueshuberia
Sc hi zolobium; Bussea;
Pelt ophorum;
Parki nsonia; Conzattia; core-Peltophorum group
Delo nix; Colvillea;
Lem uropisum
UNPLACED TAXA
- Pach yelasma
Eryth rophleum
Dim orphandra
Mora Dimorphandra group
Campsiandra Bur kea
Chidlowia Sta chyothyrsus;
Diptychandra 'Sym petalandra
Orphanodendron
Vouacapoua
7_ Mimosoideae
- doubtful placement in generic group
~~: :3 Diag~am of relationships between genera and Informal groups of Caesalpinieae based on the analyses of Polhill & Vidal (1981); Polhill (1994);
1
et at (& Schnre (1995); Kajlta et al. (2001); Bruneau et al. (2001); Herendeen et al. (2003a & b); Simpson & Lewis (2003); Simpson et al. (2003); Haston
• 2 003 & submitted)
Named frn jolrnn n Goulieb Gled itsch (17 l 4-17H6), fticncl of Li nnaeus, Gc1m:1n evidence (D 1lmcal1 el al., 2001) shed fu1th e1 <loubt on the pl::1cement of Umtizn in
bornni st and Oil t::CtOI of lhc Bol<ln ische1 Ga1len, nerlin the Deta1 ieae. In th e comb ined mo1phological and molecula 1 analysis of
Trees (anti 1 sp ii shnib); tempe1ate ~rncl subll o pica l d1y woodland and thickd on I·Ie1endeen et al (2003 a), Umtiza was nested in a daclc containing Acrocwfms,
sandy and rocky ."ilopes, lowland wet forest and sw;;nnp forest Cerato11ia, '/'elrapterocarpon, Gledilsia ancl G)im11.oc/ad11s, the i1 so-ca lled 'Umtiza
lkfercncc(s), Gordon (1966); Robertson & Lee (1976, 26-32); bii"sen el al (l'JHO' dac.le'; in a paper fu1 ther testing the monophyly of the Umtiza clacle (He1endeen
68-72); lli nggui (1982); 7.h i-Cheng 0987); Llli ones (19HH); L1rsen (19H'J); I-Jou in el al., 2003b), the genus gtoup.s with C7ym11oc/ad11s :.ind G'ledilsia in a clade si.ste1
Hou el al. ( 1996, 6J 9 - li22) to a Tet1<.1ptcrocc11pon-A1-coa-Ac1uc;,11pus-Ce1atoni:.1 chicle Removal of the gen us
A dioeLious gt:: m1 s; placed in the Glcditsia g1oup toge th er with the genus from the Dctaiieae sens lat is thus strongly suppo1ted
(~y11111odml11s hy Po lhill & Vidal 0981) and Po lhill 0994), a 1clationship Used locally frn medicine ;Jncl has alleged magk::il p1ope1ties, witchdoctors have
--
used sticks of the tree as heali ng wands; the wood w:as once usecl to house
Umt/za r
Gledltsla caspica Photograph by R.B.G., Kew (cont inued o n next p;.1gc) tsterana Photograph by P. Van Wyk p1opdlor sha fts in small boats because il s o ili ness p 1oviclcd constant lub1irntion
---- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
136 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD TRIBE CAESALPINIEAE 137
Coulterio (Brasilettia) ve/utina (unpublished combination) Coulter/a (Brasilettia) velutino (unpublished combination)
Tara spinoso Photograph by G. P. Lewis Photograph by G. P. Lewis Drawing by E. Catherine
C'u11/te1ia Kunlh C1824), in lmgc pair (exduding C 1110//is Kunth): NicaraJ.:V Hutton 13rasilellia se11su B1i1ton & Hose (1950); (,'uaymo.'>ia Brillon & Hose (JlJ30)
& Hose (1930); R11s~el/ode11d1tm B1itton & Rose ( 19~0) 9 - 10 spp; Mexico and C Aml.'1ica, 1 exlcnding 10 Cu ha , Jamaic<-1 ;ind Cu ta\·:10, l
3 spp; 1 1est1ktec.I to Mcxit:o, l in Mexit:o (Yucatan), Nicuagua, Cuba, I la iti to \'en<..:zucla (including lsla Marg;uita) ;.ind Colombi;t
jamaic;1 ancl 1he Bahanws, l in S America (Venezuela, Colombia, fa.: uadrn, Pc1u , NanH::d for the hish bota nist Thomas Coulte1'(179.3-18·1<1) who c.:ollccted in C
Bolivia ~ind Chile) <Ind culliv;Hed both within ;-rnd oulsick: (including M~ilt~t . lhe Mexico (1821 - 1834) and was cu1at01 of the hc1halium at Tiinity College, Dul)lin
Canal)' Islands, India, E and NE Afi ica) its native 1ange T1c1..•s and sh1uhs; scasrn1<.li1y d1y l1opica l forest, deciduous woodh1nd ::ind d1y
Derived from the vcrrn1cular name 't;.11a' in Peru, Bolivia and Chik 1ho1 n scrub, some species on limestone
T1ce.s and .shrubs; seasonally cl1y t1opical fo1est to se111i-t11'ic.I thorn scruh Rct'c1 e 11cds): Kunth (!82/i); ll1itro11 & H1Jse (1930: 320 - 322)
Refel'encds): IlriltDJ1 & Rose 0930: 320); Sp1aguc 0931) The gcnc1a Caesa//Ji11ia L and Brasllellia (])C) Kuntzc a1c based on the same
Two of tile 3 .c;pcx.: ies in the genus cu11·ently lac k combinations in Tara . Niu1rap,u. type, Cae.wlpi11ia 1Jrasi/ie11sis L, so tllat Brasilc:llitl sens , strict passes inlo
Tara ~111c1 }(11ssellucle11dro1t wete all 1ccognisl'd as dcments of the infrn m;tl synonymy under Cae.wljJi11ia \'V'hcn Ku nth Iii st dcsn ihed Cu11//eria he included
Russellodc:ndron ~1m1p of Cl1esa/jJi11ic1 senJ lat. hy L<..:wis ( 1998). See taxonc )111ic th1cl' sp<..:ci<..:s, hut did not typiCy the genus Two of Kunt h's species <ire synonyms
notl'S t111ck:1 Co11lteria which is the sistl'r' gl'ml.s to J'ara of (.'aesa//Ji11ia sjJi11osa (Molin::1) Kuntzc (here placed in the genus Tara) Thl'
Planted as living fcncdincs, the ba!'k of two !-ip(.x:il's willl 1rn..: dic.:in;il p1opcrlil .,, rl'llli.lining species, Cvulleria mollis T<Linth, is c...:ongcne1ic with /Jrasi/ellia .'WllS/f
thal or r SjJillOStl (Molina) B t ilton & Llose O<ll<l, spiny holdback) 1ich in l:mnms l\Jinon & Hose (19,30) and C'oulteria is thus the oldest available name r01 ;1 s1rnil l
and used in Pen1 frn· t:urning lecHher, dyeing and ink p1oduc1ion (vmious group of srecies the1t were 1cfe1rcd to by Lewis 0998) as the Hrt1silellia group of
unnme1cial p1oduc.:ls sold), also foi foc\voud and gum.-. <.'aesa/j)illitL I n the molecular analysi:-> o l Simpson el al. (2003) rhc ·i spcc...:ics of
(,(,11/lel'ill sampled ( as mcmhc1s of the /Jrasi/ellfa spct:ies g1oup of C"aesalpinia)
tinm c1 wdl-supprntcd monophylt:tic g1oup sistc1 to 'Fan1 (as the J<11ss!!llode11dru11
species g1oup of <.'aesalpi11ia) Such a 1el;11 ionship supprnts rhe cailie1
phytochcmkal findings of Ki le&: Lcwi.o.; ( 199'i) whid1 suggested that rhcsc two
dcmcnls of Caesalpinia se11s, lat might he.: l'losl'ly 1cbtcd , Some (if not all)
Crmlteria spccil's arc clioecious, and the Jlor;il moi phology wilh a fimb1 iatl! lowei-
ca lyx: lobe is .suggestive or ~I pseud o-copulatory insect pollination syndrome . The
genus is c.:ha1 'aclc1isccl by a uniqt1e cnmh i11 ;1Lion of flowe r, fiuil and seed Lypc
comhined with a distinctive phyloc.:hl'mislly: it is unck:1 revision by J.L. Cont1c1<1s_J,
Cll ll(:ntly in Puebla, Mexico; combination ... in Omlteria <lll' not yet av;:1ilablc frn <Iii
the species 1ccognised in the gl'nll.'i
P1de11ccl loc.1lly for fiic wood; .'iome specie~ used <IS. 0 1namcnt;.ds in living
fl:nl'.elines
Caesalpinia L 1753
Pui11cit11w L. (1753); 1Jmsilellit1 mc.l Kuntzc 0891)
Pomaria cav . 1799
c 25 spp ; Ca lihhc;.m ( 10 in I·Jispanio la . Cuha and rhe Bahamas). Ml.'xico Cl-i Me/a11oslicla DC. (1825): Clado1ricbi11111 Vogel 08;17)
spp., l extend ing to C Ame1ica), l in Colombia, E<.'uadrn and Pe 1u , 1 in P~11 ;1 guay 16 spp.; 9 in N America (SE USA, C and N Mexiro) , 4 in S Amel'iG1 (SE Brazil.
and Argentina, 1 endemic to MacbgasGll', 1U in Ah ic1 (1 cndcmil: in Congo Pa1agl1<1y and Argentina), 3 in southern Af1ica (Namibia, Uot~wctna and S Af1ka)
lKinsho1scd, 5 r.;stJii.:recl to .sou thern Afrirn, 4 1estJ icted to the E and NE, with 1 Named frn Dominic Pomar, bot~rnist from Valencia, and doctor to Philip HI
extending inro Oma n, S Yemen and Arabia ) (1598-1621), King of Spain
N~1111t:!d f(ll' Anclie;1 Ces::ilpino (1519-1603), ft;.ilian n<HuJ;dist, lmt~1nkal collcdor, Sh1ubs or pcrcrrnial herbs; mainly in subt1opkal cl1y areas of grassland and
systcmalist <ind philosopher, physician to Popr.: C\c111cnl Vlll, profcssol' of wooded g1;1ssland and in degraded sites, many on limestone
medicine ~111d botany in Pisa ~ind Rome Hefcrcncc(sJ: 13l'urnmitt & Ross (1974, as l-Jc!f/i11mi11seg~ict): Simpson 0998);
Trees and shrnbs; seasonally dry tropical wooclbncl, wooded g1;1ssland. co;1.-;L:tl Si111pson & Lewis (2003)
thi ck et. hush land and thrn n scr·uh, d ry plains '1!ld r ip'11 i ~in woodland, many Nnt 1ecognisecl by l'olhill IX Viclal (l981) m Polhill (1994); Simpson IX Miao 0997)
.speci .... .s on lime.stone or .sandstone and Simpson el al, (2003) have clearly clemonstr;tted that Ponwrir1 (including
llefel'encc(.<): ll1 ilton IX !lose (1930: 32.'\-32(1); Ro." (1977: 122 -DO); Thulin (.'/culolricbium from S Amedca and Ml!la11oslicla from southern Africa [the latter
(1983: !6-18; 1993: 3•14-347); Uliha11i ( 1996) dealt with u11c\e1 J!q/Jiummse~ia by Bnimrnitl & Hoss, 1974D is monophyletic
few spet:ics of Cae.wlpi11ia SC!llS, slricl have be<..'n indudcd in 111olecul;.ir an:dyscs and more closely rebted to the Poinci<1nclh1 - E1yth1oscemnn g1oup of C(u•.wlpi11h1
to datc, hue Simpson l'I al (2003) found .'>ll ong suppo11 frn a g1ouping of C rosl'i sens /t1J., th::tn to lfoj}i11mu1se.l!.Mill with w hk h it has previously been confused
U1h fi o m th<: Dominican Jk:puhlic, (,' sessilf/lura S \Xlatson f'iom Mcxko and <:
11uufaJiasca1icmsis(R,Vig) Sene:-;se f10111 M;,1dagasc.11', as we ll a.s st1cmg ~uppo 11 fo1
C, r:assioides \Ville! from N\XI Soulh Amcrk;1 being sister to C, p11lc:herrimt1 (l ) Erythrostemon Klotz.<d1 184/o
Sw fiom Mexio) and C. Ame1ic.1 , An additional 12-15, predominantly Asian , Sc/Jrammia B1itton & Rose 0930)
species whk·h do not belong to CaesaljJi11ia sens slrlU nii..: provision~rlly placed 12 -1 3 spp.; 1 in S USA ancl Mexico, 11 - 12 in S Ame1ka (I in NE Biazil, 2
he1 e (set: intJoductoiy text to tribe), Thei1 <lffinity is Jalhc..:r to a clustc1 of enclemir tn Chile, 7-8 in Argentina (3 of which extend Lo Bolivia, l tu Bolivia ancl
associated lu xa which rcqui1c f11rthc1· study before rhc..:y can be placed into gcnc1a. Peru, 1 l<> U1ugu<ty ancl l to Pa1<Lguay], l 1cst1ictecl to Peru and Ecuador)
The."ie rmw include Caesa/pinia sect Sappm1ia Benth, sL:ct N11µ.aria (DC) Hcnth., F1om e1ylbro- (Gk:: 1ed) <incl ste1110n (Gk : staml'n), the type species L', gilliesii
sect, Cinclidn1.:mp11s (Zoll.) Bcnth ., and the p1cvio11sly 1ccog niscd gene1a (W;.dl ex I look) Klotzsch has long 1ed exse1•ted swnH:::ns
/3i{/11 C.:ctl'({ Tncl, C'r.1mjJecia Adans , :me.I 7i'cc111to Ad.ins Shnrbs and woocly-hased pe1e11nial hc1hs; season: tlly chy tropicil ancl subtiopical
C{/esa/jJinia }Jlfl<:herrinw (p1 idc of Barbados la I though nor native in lhc semi-;1 1id Lhor n sci uh (including caating~r), spiny <.:actus sci uh, \V(HKllaml and
C::rdhheanl, Jed l)itd of paradise..:) is widely LllltiV<lted as ~I wuden On1<llllLll!:ll ill g1assl:1nd
rh e t1upk: ..., and subt 1opics, ;rnd has varimrs medicinal p1ope1tit:s HelC1cnce(s): Brillon IX l(ose (1930: 326); Lewi« 0998)
B1irton & Hose 09:m> recognised the genus as di:-;linct from Ca£·sa/pinio; Lewis
(1998) 1·eviscd the combined Poinci;u1elb-Eryth10stemon group ol CaesaljJl11ia
hut did nor rei nstate eithe1• element <ll generic rank . Most /:,'Jytbroslem on species
;ue cuncntl y to be found in the lite 1alllle and in he1ba1ia under <.C1esaljJiHitL In
the molt:<..:ula1 analysis of Simpson el al (2003), 4 species of E1ytb1 ·osle11um fu11ned
;1 cl;1de within a wdl-."iupprnted Poi11ci~111ella-Eryrh10stemon clade , Species
1dacion.ships within the genus a1e .still IO he resolved
/~'lylbroslumun gilliesli (yellow, or· dl'Sert bi1cl of p<11:rdise) is widl'ly cultivatL'd as ;1
g:11c.IC:'n rn namcnt;d <rnd is used in r•evc::::getation
L·oast:il fon..·st, l sp, in mixed pine-oak fot'L'sl, m:tny on highly dq.,\1<1C\ecl silt•" Gillis&. l)1oc ru1 (1')7'i) 1ccogni.scd <r'11i/(//u/i1w <1s :.1 suhgcm1s ol C(1t'salpi11i(f ,
Hl'fl'1c11cl'(.s): l~1 illon & Hose (I ')30: .127 - .136); J,ewis ( l 99H) Ve1'lluH11'l ( 1~)7l)) .suppo1tcd the 1cinst;1tcmcnl of (,'11i/(//1Cfi110 at gcnc1ic 1ank .
B1 itron & l{ose (I t):)O) 1ecognised lhc genus as dislincl holll (.'(fesdlj>i11it1: I ( \Vi" Polhill&. Vid~d ( 1{)81) placed it :1s <1 .synonym of' <.t1esdljJi11id hut 1'Cm<11kecl upon
(ll)98) tevisecl lhe co1nlJinl'd Poinl'ianella-E1·y1h1 '( isternon g1oup ol ('rt('Strl/1f11fd tl1l' unique nillll)in;ttion <if uni."il'XU:tl ~lt1wc rs, ha I'd gl<1IJulal'" seeds \Vilh st( w,1gc
hut cl id not 1einst;1le cithe1' l'lcmcnl al gene ril' l'ank , Sevl'1-,tl Foi11 c id11d!d ."pt•t il">, cotylL"clons ~incl a clislinclive accumulation of non-ptnlein a111ino adds which
especially llm-"e l"rom s Allll'li l':l, :ire lll!IL'lltly lo he round in the lill'l~l[Ull: u1d in togethe r ch<tLlclcrisc the genus and scpa1~lle il l1'om other elernl'nls of
hcd)<u·ia uncle!· (.'(1t'sa//'i11ia ln the molecul:tr :1nalysis ol Simpson el t1! (2tHl ')) • ll Caesi1/jJi11ir1 se11s /t1/ , llealcl ( ltYH) 1educecl lhc genus Lo six spcl'ies and fou r
species o f' H1i11 c ia11el/o and H1ythrosh•111011 togethe1 fc)l'mcd <1 well-supp< )rft•cl va1ielics, l)Ul hc1· Wt)lk is unpulJlishecl and 11ccc"s'11y new eo111hinalit111s in
dad!.=', IJLtl 2 wiclcly clist1·ihured spp. of J1oi11cfrme!/d (Cl1t•salpi11id e1•fos/(lt/1J'' <i'11illl11dilltt ail' oulsl:tncling. Du Puy &. lbhl'vohitta in Du Puy el al. (2002)
lknlh . and C pl11oiusu DC:.) clu ...,lc1cd logl'the1 in ~tn UlllL\'iolvecl positirni rn11-..idc clcsu ihecl (.'dl'so//Ji11io delpbi11e11sis ])u Puy & H.Rahev , ~is ~1 nl'w clo.':ie 1"elarivc lo
this <. l:.1de. Spel ie.s 1elationships \Vithin the genus arc still lo he rcsolvccl
0
(/. hmu/11c. Only c;_/Ju11r/11c L. has been included in 1ccenl molecula1 studies ~111d
A few species u.-,cd :ts g~11lk'n 01·m1mcnl:tl.", dccrnalivc sl1l'l'l l1ecs :incl livi11:.•, :t specic.<;-leve] mollXLlla1 su1vey o !" :tll (,'11f/(//tc/i11c1 hinomi~ds <1m] rcl<tll'd
femelinl's; Caesa//Jillid cd Jilldld I.am. (pau h rasil) is tcnl<tlivcly placnl ill Ct1es11/jJi1ti{f spl'cics would seem app1op1·iale
H!i11cim1cl!d :ind is lhc 11el' tl1:il gavc ils name to l~1ar.il; omc Vl'IY i111prn1:1111 ;ts ' 1 The .seed:-; o! all <i'11ilaiuli110 spl'.' cics (nicka1' beans, ni e k~11 • nuts 01 nickds), aie
M>urcc of a reel clyc it 1cmains 1he only sou rce of~ wood usecl f"o1 high qu<ili1: comnHm d1·ill ,-,eccl:-; eap<1hle ()I llo~1ting :tcl'oss oceans The seeds and ll':1vcs of <,'
violin hows; :-;0111e spe cies have kll:il 111eclicinal uses /Jom/11c have many medicinal uses; the seeds we1e once used in Eu n )pe ro make
IJul!<)JlS, :.tncl 11uny ltictl crnn1nunities Ll-"l' llK•tn HJ 111:1ke ncckL.1l'l'." ancl lw,ttclds;
roas1ecl .-;eccls h~1vl' hecn u.sed :1:-> ;i co!fee suhstitute Tile seed-; o f' some spl'cics
Cenostigma Tul 18'13 a1e used as etluntc1.s in h<>a1d g:ime.s o r as lhe equivalent to 111;1dJll''> in :1
:S spp.; C:, NE ~tnd 1x11l o r Amazonian B1;tzil chilcl ren'.s g;imc in lite C:11 ihhe:tn
1
[•'mm Ct'//0- ((;[(: e111ply) and sligllla, j)ll'Slllll:tlJly ;tlJuding lo the cf1a1lllll'll'tl
-"tigrna Cf'ound in many specie" of Lhe Cae.<.;;tlpini;1 group)
Trcl's ancl ,<.;hruhs; SL;asonally d ry tropical hushl:tncl and tliickl'l (c1:.11ing<1, ,-,l·1 11 i: 111 d
lh(lnl scrulJ), \Vl)(Jclcc] g r:t..,<.;J:tncl (Cl'lraclo) :tncl tl'll"..l f'i11lll' rt11est
lkfc1cm~ds): Lewis ( PJ87: 34-j'i); Frd re ( 199/i)
Placed in lhc C:tcsalpini:t group ol the Ctesalpinie:tl' by Polhill &. Vicl~tl ( [ ll,'.; I)
;ind Polhill (l9t) O; nesting williin the Poinci:mell:t g1oup o f' C't1estr//Ji11it1 ill \Ill""
1rnirvh(1logical :1nalysis <ii Lewis&. SLh1•i1•c ( ll)C)'i)
Cenostigma gardnerianum Photograph by G. P. Lewis Gui/andit la Cl·1·tata Drawing by P. Halliday
Stenodrepanum berg/I Drawing by G. A. Larsen and E. A. Ulibarri Zuccagnla punctata Drawing by c. A. Sobel Ba/samocarpon brevifo/lum Photograph by M. F. Gardner Mou/lava spicata Photograph by M. Sanjappa
----~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
llrt Mimosa ..
deb1/1s Var V t'
· es ita Photograph by G. P. Lewis
"6.~4 Dia
gram ofretar h. •
ions 1ps in tribe Mimoseae after Luckow et al. (2000; 2003)
Fi//oeo Psis
. d"tscophoro Drawing by P. Halliday
/ndopiptodenlo oudhensis Drawing by P. Halliday
Kanaloa Lorence & IC.R.\Vood 1994 Dichrostachys (Dc.J Wight & A1n . J834
1 sp.; Hawaii, ende mic to the S coast Mak::1wao District of the isl.and of 14 spp.; Madagasc.11 (centre of diversity wi th 9 endemic spp .); 1 sp. each in
Kaho'o la we Ethiopia- Sornali:-i and Socot1.a; l sp. in Tndi<1 ; J sp. in N Au:-;t1alia, 1 s p . (D.
Named for the Hawaiian deicy Kanaloa, w ho was closely associa ted w ith the cinerea (L.) Wighr & Arn.), wi<lespre~1d in Afdca and Asia bur namialise<l
Island of Kaho'olawe where he could rest and recoup his ene1g ies throughout rhe tmpic:-;
Shrubs; steep rocky talus slopes a nd coast~tl shrubl~mcl Prom di- (Gk .: two), cbroma (Gk .: colour) ~incl stac/Jys (Gk ,: spike), in refe1•e nce
Refe1ence(s): Lorence & \Voocl 0994) to the bi-colou 1ed inflorescences founcl in the genus
Kanaloa kahoolawensfs Lorence & K.R.\\.'ood is known from only two plants on Trees and sh rubs; tropical moist and se~1 son~1 1ly c.liy foi csr, woodland, wooded
the islan d of Kaho'olawei strongly supported in a clacle with Sch/einftzia and grnss lancl, bushkrnd, thicket and xerophytic scnib
Desmanlbus in the Leucaena group (Luckow et al., 2003; Hughes et al., 2003) Refe1-ence(s} 13rcn;rn & Il1urnmitt 0965); Thulin (1993, 366 - 368), Villie l's in Du
Puy el al. (2002, 206-218)
Jn a well supported clade with Callicmdropsis, Gagnebina <rncl Ala11tsilude11dron,
Calliandropsis H .M .Hern. & r .Guinet 1990 in the Dic hrostachys group (Luckow et al., 2003; Hughes el ed., 2003), and sister to
1 sp.; narrowly distributed in Mexico , in disjunct populations from Du1:mgo :1s for Gagne/Jina in the m01phological an~il ysis of J-lt1ghes (1998)
sout h as Oaxaca Dic/Jrostacbys cinerea (sickle bush) is a widespread ex tremely vari1:1blc species,
From opsis- (Gk.: appearance), rcferriflg to its resemblance to Calliandra, another wirh nume1ous subspecies and va1ieties; it i!'> ~1 111ulti-pu1pose tree, the timber is
g:eous of mimosoid legumes (in tribe lngeae) used for construction, fencing, ca rpentry, firewood ~rnd chartoa l; othcl" uses a1e <lS
Shrubs; tropical dry tho rn forest and ::11 id scrub lands, on 1ocky rnlcareous soils; c. ornamenw l:-;, medicine, livestock fodder (goats), fibre from lhe Lr.11 k (rope), bee
1450-2000 Ill fo1age, hunting bows and for ~oil improvement; it is some1imes an inva.-;ive and
Reference(s), lleinfodez & Guinet 0990) persislenr weed of cultivated land
\Vell supported as ra11 of the Dichrostachys g1oup in the molecular analysis of
Luckow et al, (2003)
Alantsilodendron Villieis 1994
10 spp.; N, \V & S MaclagasG11
Gagnebina Neck. ex DC. 1825 frorn alcmtsilf, the Malagasy name for 'd 1y foresl', ancl de11dron (Gk i: tree)
8 .')pp.; Madagascar (6 endemic spp ), 2 spp. extend ing to sun·ounding Comoros, Shn.1bs or small t1ees; seasonally c.11y t1opi c:1 I wooc\bncl, thorn scrub and thicket to
Seychelles (Akh1b1 a and Astove) and Mascarene Islands xc 1ophyti c s hrubland, on calc.:<1reou s so ils
Named for Abraham Gagnebin de la FeniC1e (1707-1800), Swiss physician ~ind Refe1ence(s): Villiers 0994); Villiers in Du Puy el a l (2002, 198-206)
botanist Genus segrega ted fl'om Dichroslacbys by Vi llie1s 099'1), and closely allied to
Trees and shrubs; se::isonally dry tropica l fo1est 1 woodland and thicket (1 sp in Dicbrostachys, CaRne/Jiua :rnd Cal/iaudropsis in the Oich1ost::1chys g1oup
moist forest and forest mmgins) (Luckow et al , 2000; 2003)
Reference(s} Lewis & Guinet (1986); Luckow (1995: 2002); Luckow & Du Pu y Timber used fo1 posrs in house <..:onslit1ccion
(2000); Villiers in Du Puy et al (2002, 218 - 222)
Gag11ebina is suppo11ed as a monophyl e tic group by Luckow et al. (2003) w ithin
the Dichroscachys group (see note under Dicbrosracbys); VUlie rs in Du Pu y et rrl.
(2002) tre:tt three Madagascan species of Gagnebi1w t1mler Dicbrostachys but chis
is not suppo11ecl in th e analysis of Luckow et al. (2003)
Used for wood (const1u ction and charcoal), also for p<.1pe11
'
widesp reCld i n SE Asi~ range of ha b itats; ofre11 planted near villages
' Named in honour of Mungo Park (1771 - 1806), Scollish surgeon & t1<1vellcr in
Africa
Reference(s): A ltschul (1964; 1972)
Fonneily treated as section Niopa of Piµtaclen.ia; nested w ith an element of the
Trees; tropica l lm:vland rain forest (ripalian, swamp and non-inundated), hill polyphyletic Piptadenia (i.e. P. virldijlora (Kun th) flenth .) in the analysis of
forest, seasonally d ry fores t, woodla nd (ce1 rndo), wooded g1ass land ~111d coastal Lu ckow el al. (2003)
dune fo1est (restinga) Anadenanlhera peregrina (L) Speg (cohoba, niopo or yopo) is one of the classic
Reference(s): Hopkins 0983; 1986; 1994; 2000a , 2000b); Vill iers (1989: 26 - 33); hallucinogens of the Arnc1icas, lttken as snuff made from the crushed seeds; A
Burki II 0995: 244 - 252); Hopkins in Beny el al (2001: 659 - 664) co/11bri11a (Veil .) B1-cnan (angico preto, cebil , curupay) is used for timber (heavy
Of the three sections in Parkia only section Parkia is pancropicnl, the 01hcr cwo COOSlruct io n , Oooring, l<tihvay sleepers, turnety) and leathe1- tanning
being 1estricted l o the Ncolropics~ All 1ecen1 phylogenelic analyses indicate tha(
Parkia is most closely relaced to members o f the Pipcadenia group, :rnd is no( a
basally branching genus in the Mimosoidcae Pseudopiptadenia Rauschen 19s2
Parkia speciosa Hassk. is used as human food in SE Asia; man1re and slighdy
Monoschisma Brenan 0955); Newtonia sect Neonewlonia Burkart (1979) (=
immature green seeds ate e<Hen as a vegetable (peta i, sa 1aw bea n, chou dou),
'American Newtonia' of Lewis & Elias (1981))
sold fresh as bunches of s11-ap-shaped pods in markers and as pods or loose
11 spp; S Amer ica, centred in NE to SE Bmzil (c. 7 spp, " t least one to Paraguay),
seeds, enten fresh or tin ned, from supermarkets; seeds are also ferm ented and 1he
4 spp. in northern S America (to Peiu), one wic.lespl'e:.id to C America
pulpy endocarp makes a refreshing drink; other species are used extensively ~s
From pseudo- (Gk : fa lse) and Piptadenia, a re lated genus in M imosea e
food in W Africa (e.g., P. b/gltl//o.'ifl Qacq.) G.Don, or ncere, African locus t bean);
Trees and shru bs; tropical coa st<ll iain forest, galle1y fores t, seconcla1y forest,
also used 8.S Cfl ltl e fockler, cordage, shade tree.s, med icine Hncl th e timbc t in
wood land , wooded grassland (cerrado) and rho1 n scrub (caa tinga)
plywood mant1facrure 1 construction, utensi ls and as firewood
Reference(s): Lewis (1991a, c); Lewis & Lima (1991); Grimes 0993)
Placed in the Piptaden ia group and considered to be allied with Pa rapiptadenia
by Lewis & Elias (1981: 157)
Pseudopiptadenia pittie1i (Hal'ms) G J>.Lewis is used for timber (carbone10) in
heavy consl ruction, furnitu1 e, flooring, posts, llll nery and ra ilway sleepers; tannins
are extiaclccl from the bark
Pseudop1ptadenia
· brenanii Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Parkia bicolor Drawing by I. Zewald
The monogeneric tribe Mimozygantheae was described cl cl ovary and a larg p ltate stigma . Burka rt (1952)
to accommo d ate the single sp ecies Mimozyganthus propo ed that the genu Dinizia Ducke shou ld also be
carinatus (Griseb.) Bu rkart, orig inally described in the included in the Mimozygantheae b ut Hutchinson 0964)
genus Mimosa. Burkart comme nted that the genus placed Dinizia in the Mimoseae and Schul ze-Menz
Mim ozyganth us was transitiona l be tween the (1964) placed it in the Parkieae. Guinet (1981) grouped
Mimosoideae and Caesalpinioideae esp ecially because Mimozygantbus with Dinizia in his m imosoid pollen
of its peltate stigma, imbricate sep als and essentially stu dy, b ut Elias (1981b) repositi oned Dinizia in the
valvate petals (the upper half of the corolla always w ith Mi1noseae, thus re-establishing the Mimozygantheae as
the petals valvate but the lower half with some overlap mo nogeneric. Luckow et al. (2003) did not include
at the m a rgi n s). H e su gges ted, b ecau se of the Mimozygantbus in their mo lecula r study but recent
combina tio n o f p eta l a nd sepal aes ti vatio n, a w o rk (Lu ckow et a l. , submi tted a) indica tes that
relatio nship w ith tribe Parkieae (the two genera of that Mimozygantbus sho uld be placed in the Prosopis group
tri be cu rre ntly p lac ed e lsewhe re a nd the tribe of Mimoseae, near Piptadeniopsis and Prosopidastrum.
disba nde d) but p o inted o ut th at Mimozygan thus While treated in its tradition al sense he re pend ing
diffe red in having spinescent stip ules, free sepals, free publication of this analysis (Fig. 25) , there is no doubt
stamens, eglandular anthers, no staminodes, a few- that tribe Mimozygantheae should be disba nded.
Mimozyganthus Mimozygantheae
FIG. 2 5 Diagram ofrelationships to tribe Mimozygantheae after Luckow et al. (submitted a) Mimozyganthus carinatus Photograph by M. Luckow
A.cacieae b y G. P. Lewis
'frib Acaciea is idely attributed t Bentham 18 2), resurrected or newly described fro m within it in clue
;i sat 1 81) and Ma ·Jin et. a l. (2001 , bur Re v a l course. The five genera correspond to those recognised
e.. g,
(l 997) giv Dumorri r (1829 a th first pl ce of by Ped ley except that Senegalia sens. lat. is regarded
ubli ·a ci n f th tribe a nd thi s is confi rme d by as comprising three gen era : Sen egalia sens. strict.,
~nim111ill pers. comm., 2 0 . Th enus Faidberbia Acaciella Britton & Rose (syno nym Acacia su bgenus
A.Che . wa ind ud cl in the Acaciea by VassaJ (1981 A culeiferum section Filicinae (Benth.) Taub .), and an
ii nd is sci.II r ra ined a parL f th u-ibe by Ma. !in et al. undescribed genus based on Acacia coulteri Benth.
(2003). The tribal p ' it io n f Fa idherbic1 r m a in. and a small group of related specie s. Acacia subgenus
qu iv al, althoug h l ewis & Rico Arc (th. volum Aca cia appears more closely related to tribe Mimoseae
place 1h genus in rrib lngea following Polh ill (1 99 ) and subgenus Phyllodineae nests w ithin the Ingeae in
and Lu ·kow et a l . ( 2003) r ndering rhe caciea most recent studies (Luckow et al., 2003). Wh ile these
monogeneric, w ith the single ge nu s Acacia . The two taxa are not moved o ut of the Acacieae in this
taxonomic status of Aca cia and its relationship to other trea tment, this seems a likely future consequence of
mimosoicl genera is, howev r, as yet u nresolved. At recent research. Removal of Acacia sens. strict. from
present three subgenera a re recognised within Acacia the Acacieae wou ld leave the tribe w ithout its type
sens. lat.: Acacia, A culeiferum and Phyllodin eae. ge nu s so that Acacie ae could the n n o longer be
Pedley (1986) proposed that these three subgenera be re tained . It is not appropriate here to re instate , change
given generic rank, namely A cacia, Senegalia Raf. and o r d e scribe new gene ri c n a m e s, es pecially as
Raco~perma Mart., respectively, but th is was not widely application of the names Acacia and Ra cosperma are
<1ci optecl, alth o ugh the d e b a te s urro unding thes e currently under review (Maslin et al. 2003, O rchard &
suggested nomenclatural changes con tin ues. Pedley Maslin , 2003; Luckow et al., su bmitte d b) . A proposal
(2003) has recently published combinations (several to retypify Acacia b ase d o n a n Au s tra lian taxon
hu nci reci of w hich are n ew) in Racosperma for all (O rchard & Maslin , 2003) has recently been p assed by
Australian phyllodinous acacias . What is clear is that the the Committee for Sp erma tophy ta bu t this decisio n
genus Acacia , a s c urre n tly circumscribe d , is n o t awa its ra tifica tion . Th e p resent tre atment of the
monophyletic (Maslin et al., 2003; Miller & Bayer, 2003; Acac ieae thus recognises a single genus containing c.
Miller et al., 2003), and at le ast five genera shou ld be 1450 species (Fig. 26).
FI G. 26 Diagram of relationships in tribe Acacieae largely based on Miller & Bayer (2003)
Niel n 19 la) recogni ed 21 nera in In ae (Tabl Clarification of generic relationships within tribe
) although were n~t gi~en gen~ric names, ~ut were Ingeae still suffers from a paucity of molecular data,
7 partly due to a lack of appropriate material for DNA
referred t a Gen. A to Gen. D . He recogms d the
genus Mc1rmaroxylon, although withom a generic extraction of the recently described and reinstated
number, so that the trib , to the casual observ r genera. Luckow et al. (2000) included four ingoid
gpp ared ro contain only 20 genera. The genu genera in their analysis of the basal genera of
pu.njuba appended by Niel ·en 1981a) under "genera Mimosoideae. These formed a group together with
and pedes of unknown affinity'' i h re Lr at d as a Faidherbia (then still considered a member of tribe
synonym of Aharema, following Barneby & Grimes Acacieae , although moved to Ingeae by Polhill
(1996 , although we suggest that this may be reinstated (1994)). Barneby & Grimes 0996) concentrating on
as a g cl genu in th future . Ni n J9 la) al o neotropical taxa, divided American ingoids into five
included Pithecellobium incuriale (Yell.) Benth. as a informal alliances: the Abarema-, Samanea-,
" pe ie1> of unknown affinity" but this is now placed in Chloroleucon-, Pithecellobium- and Inga- alliances.
Leucocbloron Barneby & Grimes (1996) Genera of uncertain position within their system
Polhill 0994) increased the number of genera of included Albizia, Enterolobium and Cedrelinga.
Ingeae to 25 (Table 7). He recognised Nielsen's 'Gen. Lysiloma was considered as intermediate between
A' as Paraserianthes LC.Nielsen, 'Gen. B' as Archiden- tribes Ingeae and Acacieae. Luckow et al. (2003)
dropsis LC.Nielsen, 'Gen. C' as Pararchidendron carried out a phylogenetic analysis of the
LC.Nielsen, and 'Gen. D' as Macrosamanea Britton & Mimosoideae using chloroplast DNA sequence data.
Rose ex Britton & Killip. He placed Faidherbia in They treated sixteen of th e 36 ingoid genera
Ingeae for the first time, reinstated Cathormion, recognised in this account, including Faidherbia, but
Samanea and Chloroleucon, and recognised the concluded that relationships within the Ingeae are
monospecific Obolinga Barneby (subsequently generally unresolved and that, with only a few
subsumed into Cojoba by Barneby & Grimes, 1997). exceptions, clades within the ingoid part of their
Zapoteca, a segregate of Calliandra described by topology were not strongly supported. Albizia
Hernandez (1986), was also added by Polhill 0994). proved to be polyphyletic, supporting the findings of
Klugiodendron, recognised by Nielsen 098la), was Grimes (1999).
considered a synonym of Abarema by Polhill (1994), Any new classification of the Ingeae will require
and Ajfonsea was placed as a synonym of Inga, a sampling of all the genera not included by Luckow et
position later confirmed by Pennington 0997). al. (2003) and more extensive sampling of the larger
The present treatment of Ingeae recognises 36 and putatively non-monophyletic genera. Relationships
genera (24 of which are New World endemics) and between ingoid genera and the various elements of a
(935)-951-(966) species (Fig. 27). We follow Barneby polyphyletic Acacia have still to be resolved, although
& Grimes (1997) in placing Obolinga as a synonym of Luckow et al. (2003) have an Acacia subgenus
Cojoba. Eight genera: Blan~hetiodendron, Ebenopsis, Phyllodineae clade nested within the Ingeae ,
Hesperalbizia, Hydrochorea, Leucochloron, Painteria, suggesting that at least part of Acacia sens. lat. (the
Pseudosamanea, and Sphinga, have either been Australian phyllodinous acacias) might be included
reinstated or described as new since 1994 (Barneby & within the Ingeae in the future, or that the Ingeae, as
Grimes, 1996). Paraserianthes section Falcataria was currently circumscribed, may have to be broken up
raised to generic status as Falcataria (LC.Nielsen) into several distinct suprageneric taxa. Such suggestions
Barneby & Grimes (1996). Balizia Barneby & Grimes are premature as 20 ingoid genera, including Abarema,
0996) is considered a synonym of Albizia following Archidendron, Pithecellobium, Zygia and the largely
Rico Arce (1999). Guinetia L.Rico & M.Sousa was Madagascan Viguieranthus have not yet been included
described as new (Rico Arce et al., 1999, pub!. 2000), in molecular analyses.
and Viguieranthus Villiers in 2002.
Hesperalbizia
Pseudosamanea Samanea alliance
Samanea
Acacia subg.
Phyllodineae (see page 187)
UNPLACED TAXA
Albizia
Enterolobium
Lysiloma
FI G. 27 Diagram of relationships in tribe lngeae mainly after Barne by & Grimes (1996, 1997); Luckow et al. (2003)
Faidherbia A.Che v. 1934 Guinetia L.Rico & M.Sousa 1999, publ. 2000
1 ~p . ; Africa (widespread in Suda nian, Zambezian and S<1 he lian regio ns f1om 1 sp ; Mexico (endemic to O:axaca)
Egypt, Senega l and the G;1mbia south to Botswana , ~md KwaZu lu Na1al in S Named for Philippe Guinet 0 925 - ), french sc hool teache r and palynologist
Africa) and in the Arabian Peninsula to \ Y,/ Asia (Ir~rn) ; iniroduced in India , Nepal, specialising in mimosoi<l legumes
P:Jkistan, Peru and some At lanric islands Slm1bs; seasonally d1y tropical lowland forest, 0 - 150 m
Named for the Fr·ench general L.L C, Faiclhe1be (1819-1889), govern o1 of Senegal Hefcrcnce(s): Hico Arce el nl, (1999, publ , 2000)
in 1854 <tncl 1863, who pllblishe<l seve1al woJ'k s about Senega l and Algeria
Ti-ccs; seasona lly dry twpical to subt1opic:1I rive rin e and g1ounclw:He1 fotcs t,
woocll<incl, swamps and llooclplains Calliandra llenrh. 1840
Rcfcrcn cc(s): B1c nan 0959: 78-79, ;is Awcia a/bida Delile); Wickens ( 1969, as /lnn es/ia Salisb. (1807)
Acacia albida); Ross 0979: 83--'35); Burkill 0995: 233-236); VcntCI' & \'enter c. 135 sp p .; endemic to the Americ1 s, 1anging from S\V' USA to Uruguay, wa1m
0996: 22-23); Timhel'iake e/ a/, 0999: 24-26); Barnes & Fagg (2003) tempera Le Argentin;J and N Chil e; 30 srp restricted to N A111e1 ica, 4 spp
Segrega ted from Acacia by A. Chevalier in 1931, but this w~1s ignore d unlil extending from. N AmeriG1 into north ern S Am erica, 6 spp . endemic to the
recently; 111ole<.:ul;;11· studies of Luckow el al (2000, 2003) confirm rli~1t the genus Caribbean, a c.:0 11ccnt1ation of taxa (66 sr p.) from NE to SE 131'azil (\vith 31
belongs to Ingeae and not ro Acacicac ; the slrn pe of the ripe pods inspi1cd the end emic to I3ahia), 26 spp. restricted to N, NW and \Y/ S AmeriG1 ( from the
common n ~ 1 rne 'apple-ring aG1cia' Gu i<inas to S Peru :ind \Y/ l3oli via)
Faidberbia nlbida (Delilc) A.Chev. (wi11te1 tho rn; see Barnes & f;igg (200.'\) for Fro m calli- (G k : beautiful) and a11dros (Gk .: man); m osr species have brigh!l y
1eview o f vemacula1 names) is used in ;ig1·oforeslry, for livestock fodde r, colour ed 0 1 showy slamen filaments
rnedicine, famine food ( humans), shelter and shade trees (unwmal in bc in ~ Trees :.rnd shrubs; moslly seasonally dry tropica l forest (man y 1 iparian), wood land,
leaness duting the rniny season <tn<l lea fy during the chy season), hedge!->, ;u1d thorn fof'est and sc1ub (cciatinga); wooded grassland (cena<lo) and rock}'
timber (foi light construction , utensils, tools , co nwiners <mcl fences); rh e lxuk, shrubla ncl (campo rupestre), some tropical su bmonwne, several acbptecl to clese1t
roors <incl powdered pods have been used ::ls a fish poison; bark srrips a1c used e nvi ronmen ts
( like dental no."i.s) to cle;:m teeth; in some areas a popular o rn amental and is s:iid Reference(s): Thulin el al. 0981, for Afri c~1n species, but .see notes below),
to be an indicator of fc1'lilc sites Barneby (1998); Bassler (1998: 158 - 168); Chamberlain (200 1)
lfarneby (1998) rest1ictecl Ca!lirmdra to the Ameri cas , rejecting Olcl \\lorkl species
named as Calliandra from the genus (see notes und er V(q11ieran1h11s); he implied
Zapoteca H.M.Hern. 1987 ('1986') new ge ne ric status for two African species, referred Madagascan species to
20 srp.; Neotr'op ics, 11 spp. f10111 S\V' USA ~mcl N Mexico th1·ough C Ame1 ict :ind \figu.ieranlbus and rejected 3 Tnclo-Bunnese species fro m Callirmdra sens. strict.
th e C;:i ribbea n (6 sp p. endemic in Mexico with a concen t r'~lli o n in 0:1x;1ca, 3 \'V'i dely culti va ted as ornamentals (calli;111dr:1, powder puff); used in agrofrn'Cst ty
endemic in C America ;:ind 1 in Hispaniola); 6 s pp. restricted to S Americ:t ;111d (e .g., C. bousloniana (Mil L) StanclL va r. ca/othyrsus (Meis n.) I3ameby, as live.stock
largely ci rcum-Amazonian (1 endemic in Colombi;:i, I in F.cuaclor, 1 in Peru and 1 fodder, fuclwood, green manure, pulp fo 1 pape1 production, erosion control,
in Brazil), 3 spp. widespread rh1ough N :rnd S Amcric.i ( J extending 10 Pa 1;1gu~ 1 Y filebreal<s, r efo1·es1ation, bee forage, le;1 f meal ( protein sou rce), medicine and as
and N Argentina) shade frees
Named for the Zapotcc people of 0 ;1xaca, Mexico .
Shrubs; common in o pen sites derived from seasonally diy 1ropical fo 1'Cst, ~ind in (see also nexc four figures on following page)
arid and semiarid scru bby vegetatio n and wet evergreen forest
Re fere nce(s): Herna nd ez 0986, 1989, 1990); He rn itnd ez & Campos (1994): Jlcisslcr
0998: 153 - 158)
All species o f 11enthain's Callim 1dm ser ies Laeteuirellles ~ir e inducled in Zopoteca;
the single species o f ZajJoteca included in the study of Lu ckow el al. (2003) is
sister to Fctidb erbia , basally bi;rnching in Ingeae
Used as o rn ~ 1111 e ntal s
Havardia small 1901 Pitbecellobium Ma1t. 1829 (110111. and orth_ conserved 1837)
5 s pp.; Mexico, Texas and C A1ne1ica J8 spp.; N and S America , including the Caribbean, 12 spp. restricted to Mexico, C
Named fo r Dr Va leiy 1-JavJrcl, Assistant Surgeon-Genera l of rhc US Army , ;.1 diligent America and the Gre~He1' Antilles (3 exrencling N into subt1opica\ Mexico, the
student of the N American floi'a lfahJmas and Florida, 1 circum-Ca1ibbean) 1 3 on ly in no11hern S America and 3
Trees; wa1m temperate and seasona lly c11y t1opica l woodland, wooded g1ass land more wiclespreJd both sides of the Pananrn isthmus
and d esert th o rn scn.1b, mostly below 450 m From pitheco- (Gk.: monkey) and e/lobion (Gk.: eal'J"ing) in allusion to the
Referen ce(s): 13arncby & Grimes (1996: 165 - 173) pendulous, contoitecl fruits
Placecl in th e 'Pithecellobium-alliance' of Bai neby & G 1imes (1996) Trees and shrubs; lowland seasonally d1y tropirnl woodland and thorn .scrub
Hauardia pa/lens (I3cnth.) Britton & Rose (tenaza, huaji\Jo) is used for wood below 500 m, some to 1550 111, a few on co<1s tc1l dunes or in 1ipa1 ian woodland
(turnery, urc nsil.s), livestock fodder, revegetatlon, bee forage and as an orrn1mental Reference(s): Barneby & Grimes 0997: 2 - 36), Basslc1• (1998: 168-182)
Prior to 1981, Pithecellobium se1vcd as a dumping ground for many ingoid
species of unknown affinity but the genus now excludes all Old \\forld taxa <it one
Ebenopsis B1itton & Rose 1928 tim e placed within it
Pithecellobiwn dulce (Roxb.) IJenth. (Madras thorn , Manila tamarind,
Sideropsis Small (1901)
guayarnochil), is a common ornamenta l, hedging and s hade tree, where it is also
3 spp.; Mexico (including the Yuca tan) and S Texas
grown for the edible pulp in the seed aril (also made into beverages); other uses
From 'eba no', the comon name of the type species, perhaps because of its hard
include timber (constructio n and po.sts), li vestock fodder, firewood, bee forage
\vood .similar to Ebenus
(honey). seed oils (soap) and ba1k for tanning; plants can be tenacious weeds
T1ees and sh111bsi warm temperate and seasonally dry tropicfll woodland, thicket,
thorn forest and deseit shrubland
Reference(s): Barneby & Grimes 0996: 173-178)
Placed in the 'l'ithecellobium-alliance' of Barneby & Grirnes (1996)
Ebenops1:s ebano (13erl ancl.) Bai neby & ] W.Grirnes (Texas ebony) is used for
wood (fence posts, charcoa l) and as ~m 01 m1rnental
approach o f stornt~ lt.'t.ling the rain fa ll through ro the ground tongue), arc used for timber (constr1.1ct ion, furni ture, cabinet w01k, ve neers,
Trees; seasonall y dry 1ropic.al deciduous to moist evergreen ()1es1, woodla nd and general ca rpentry), livestock fodde1·, human food (fruit p ul p and seeds), bark (fibre
wooded grassland and pulp fo r pa per), medici ne, firewood, gums, tannins, <l yes, ink, soaps, fish
II ·rcrencc(s)1 Darn •by & Grimes (19960 117- 126) poisons, ornamentals, street and plantatio n shade tree!-i a nd for reforesca tion
111c genus w:is rcin.st:ued hy llarncby I!< G1imes ( 1996). who coiwin i1q;tly :ur;uc<l
for the recognition of th ree species
Samanea saman (Jacq.) Me l'r. ( 1ain tiee, sc1111an, rnonkeypod, coco 01 cow
1mnnrlnd) is wl<l<:ly pl:m1cd In the Id ood New W.,rld 1rople< for shad•·· :is on
15
ornamuntnl :md for le< 1m1ri1ie1\1, pod• (for """'Moc k fodder nnd chc i;wc<• pulp
a lluincrn food , also mJde into a beve1age); also used for meclicint:, ti111IJc:1
(furniture, genern l co nstruction, interior trim , box es and crares, panelling,
plywood and venee r), hats (made from w oocl shavings) ;ind bee forage (honey)
Lysilomo tergemlno Photograph by c. E. Hughes Inga Sp. aff. densifloro Photograph by G. P. Lewis
swartzieae by H. E. Ireland
Cali a
Uribe a
(Sophoreae sens. lat.,
see page 228)
Lecointeoid clade pro parte;
basally branching so kb ~
Zollernia inversion genera '--J
Holocalyx
B Lecointea Bobgunnia madagascariensis Drawing by E. M. Stones Bobgunnia madagascariensis Photograph by a. D. Schrire
FIG. 28 Diagram of relationships in tribe Swartzieae after Ireland et al. (2000); Pennington et al. (2001); Wojciechowski et al. (2004). Genera traditlonallY
placed in Swartzieae now occur in at least four different positions within the Papillonoideae. Clade A comprises two separate elements, the basallY
branching tribe Swartzieae sens. strict., as well as a group of basally branching non-5okb Inversion genera sister to elements of the Sophoreae sens.
lat. and Dipterygeae (Aldinoid clade of Ireland et al., 2000, pro parte). Clade B represents elements of Sophoreae and Swartzieae sens. lat. that com prise
the basally branching genera of the 5okb inversion clade (Lecointeoid clade of Ireland et al., 2000, pro porte). Clade C comprises geneta of SwartzJeae
sens. lat. possibly sister to the Vataireoid clade, but see author's postscript on previous page, where a recent analysis (Mansano et al., 2004a) finds
Harleyodendron and Exostyles are strongly supported together with Zollernia, Holocalyx and Lecointea in the Lecointeoid clade (Clade B). Clade D contains
Bocoapr . .
Baphiopsis sister to the Baphioid clade of Sophoreae sens. lat. ouacens1s Drawing by H. Rypkema
Ateleia (Moq. & Sesse ex DC.) Ilenth. 1837 Cordyla Lour. 1790
20 spp.; Mexico, C Arnerica & Caribbean (c 17 s pp.); S America (Ve nezuela to N c. 7 spp.; c , 5 spp. in Africa in the Za mbezian, Sudan ian and Somalia-Masai
Argentina ; 2 spp .); J sp. widespread phytochoria of White 0983); 2 spp in Madagascar
From ate/eta (Gk : t:ncompleteness, impe1jeclion), referring to the tlowers lacking From cordyle (Gk .: club), referring to the club-shaped Fruit
four of the five petals T1ees and shrubs; seasonally dry tropical fores! (often riverine), woodland,
Trees and shrubs; tropical to subtropical seasonally d1y forest, woodland, bushland and scl'll b, often on rocky hillsides
bushlaf'ld and xerophytic shrubland, often in rocky areas or riverin e; 1 sp. of high Heference(s): Milne-Redhead 0937); \:lrern1n 0967: 221-223); Thulin 0993: 361);
humid forest Du Puy & Labat in Du Puy et al. (2002: 294 - 297)
Refere nce(s): Mohlenbrock (1962b); Rudd (1968a); Ireland (2001: 199-270) The genus is being worked on by Ki1 kbrid e who suggests tlut two generic
This genus was previously included in the Sopho1eae; see comment on elements may be involved
relationships under Triscbidium Used as ornamentals and shade trees, timber, medicine and human food
Used for timber, insecticides and wildlife-food
'
the B1:1 zilian flora
Small trees o r shrubs; tropical coasta l fores t on steep rocky slopes
Holocalyx Miche li 1883 Refe1 ence(s): Cowan 0979)
I sp.; NE Argentina, S Brazil anJ Paraguay Sister to Exoslyles based on molecu lar evidence (Ireland et al, 2000); well suppo1ted
Prom bolo- (Gk~ : entire) and calyx (Gk.: c11p) 1 referring to the entire c:i lrx wit h in the Lecoirneoid clade (Mansano et al., 2004a)
T1 ecs; se.a!'ionally d1y tropica l to s ubtropical riverine forest and wood land
Reference(s} !3u1ka11 0952: 188); Ulilrn•ri 0997: 6 - 7)
The tribal placemen t of /Joloca(lix is un certain, and it has often been pb rcd in the
Sopho1·eac; analysis of DNA sequence data r:d accs it with Lecointea and Zoller 11ia
( wuri~I ~le) and Urtbea (Sophoreae) (Ireland el al., 2000~ Wojcl~'('hmvsk i , 2003)
/Jaloct1/jn: l1nlf1n$.1.Ul Micl1eli (wood rosemary, rosem aty-of-c:unpina:-.-. ibir;1pepC) is
used fo r its resistant and durable timber (for constru crio n, be.:1rns, fur11iw1e •ind
carpentry), ::1s otnamenrnls and shade trees, but the leaves :i re toxic (ronwi ning
cya nogenic glycos ides)
Exostyles venusta (1-4), E. amazonico (5 , 6) Drawing by P. Halliday Exostyles venusta Photograph by v. de F. Man sano
polhill (1994) treatm nt the following informal trnL results are corroborated, it seems likely that
10 Sophoreae will be dismembered with its genera
oups w r r ogni d: the Iyroxylon group 11
~ en1 ; 10 eocropic , on Africa); Orm sia group (3
11 scattered across several tribes. This would entail
genera; eotrop.ic , Africa , A ia); Angyl alyx group (4 extensive taxonomic changes. Yakovlev Cl972b; 1991)
!enera; eotropics Africa Au tralia); Baph.ia group (6 split Sophoreae into five and nine tribes respectively.
genera ; Africa to Asia)· ussia group 9 genera· These classifications have not been widely accepted,
Neotr pies and ophora group (14 genera; Africa , and although they are not congruent with the most
Asia, Neotropics). recent molecular topologies, they will need to be
The only formal change made to the classification of considered in any formalisation of new tribal names. In
sophorea e since Polhill 0994) is the tra nsfer of any new scheme, Sophoreae sens. strict. will comprise
Bowringic1and Baphiastrum to Leucomphalo (Breteler, a group of genistoid clade genera from among Polhill's
1994b). Jn this account we maintain Bowringia and 0994) Sophora group (Fig. 29), but published
Baphiastrum, not because we disagree with Breteler molecular phylogenetic studies have not yet sampled
(1994b), but in the spirit of this volume, to encourage sufficient genera to suggest its delimitation.
future workers to verify the monophyly of A new classification for Sophoreae requires sampling
J,eacomphalos sens. lat. with new data. We also do not of the genera not included by Pennington et al. (2001;
follow Polhill's 0994) suggestion that Riedeliella, see Fig. 29) and other authors, in future molecular
Etaballia and Inocarpus belong in Sophoreae. It has systematic studies. Some of the clades discovered by
been generally accepted (e.g., Polhill, 1981b) that these DNA sequence data (Fig. 29) are cryptic in that they are
belong in Dalbergieae, which is confirmed by the recent not marked by obvious macro-morphological features ,
study of Lavin et al. (2001a) that places them in the and it is therefore perilous to attempt to determine the
Dalbergioid clade. They are therefore treated as affinities of genera based upon macro-morphology
Dalbergieae in this volume (see page 307). alone. It may be that these clades are defined by
Cladistic analyses of overall morphology (Chappill, anatomical or chemical characters. For example,
1995; Herendeen, 1995) and pollen data (Ferguson et al., quinolizidine alkaloid accumulation may be a
1994) showed Sophoreae to be non-monophyletic synapomorphy for the Genistoid clade (Pennington et
because Swartzieae genera were mixed in the same al., 2001; Kite & Pennington, 2003), and lack of these
monophyletic groups as Sophoreae. These results have chemicals in Styphnolobium species supports the
been corroborated by molecular studies. Doyle et al. segregation of this genus from Sophora sens. strict. The
0996) showed Sophoreae to be heterogeneous for a presence of quinolizidine alkaloids in Calia, which is
large inversion in the chloroplast genome. This suggests not placed amongst the genistoids, suggests that this
that Sophoreae is non-monophyletic if it is assumed that genus is a strong candidate as sister group to the
the inversion arose only once. Doyle et al.'s 0997) DNA Genistoid clade, a relationship that might be resolved
sequencing study of the chloroplast gene rbcL included by more robust molecular phylogenies. Such
18 genera of Sophoreae. Cladistic analysis showed these phylogenies should incorporate information from
to be scattered widely across the papilionoid tree. More nuclear genes (Lavin et al., 1998; Doyle & Doyle, 2000)
recently, these results have been conoborated by another which would be particularly useful to test hypotheses
chloroplast locus, the trnL intron (Pennington et al., that are currently based solely upon evidence from
2001). This study sa mpled more putatively basal genera chloroplast DNA. Careful integration of morphology,
of Papilionoidea (26 of 41 ophorea ; 14 of 15 preferably as part of a simultaneous cladistic analysis,
Wartzj ,1e and all Dalbergieae and Dipte1ygeae). The is also critical. Such morphological study may be best
trnL tree (summarised in Fig. 29) is also largely congrnent achieved by focusing on separate monophyletic groups
With other molecular studies that include some taxa of because assessment of homology of morphological
ba al PapiJionoidea .g. , Hu et al. , 20 O; Ireland et al, features across all Papilionoideae is difficult. The
2000; Lavin el al., 2001a; Kajita et al., 2001; Wojci chowski monophyletic groups discovered in the trnL analysis
et al., 2004). fl clearly shows g nera of oph r e to be provide a framework for statting these future studies. In
Ill.embers of disparate papilionoid clades. all 45 genera and (393) - 396 - (398) species are treated
Diverse data ets now indicate Sophoreae to be non- here (including c. 76 basally branching, c. 262 genistoid
lb.onophyletic a 1 olhill (1981b; 1994) predicted. If the and c. 58 baphioid species of Sophoreae; Fig. 29).
LEFTS
ophora mtcrophy//a
. Photograph by P. Gasson
CAESALPINIOID
OUTGROUPS
Amplilmas Myroxylon group
GENERA FOR WHICH NO MOLECULAR DATA ARE Panurea Dussia group
AVAi LAB LE AND WHOSE PLACEMENT IS UNCERTAIN Splrq.tro'pls Dussia group
tlleanthus Dussia group
FIG. 29 Synopsis of relationships of Sophoreae, based on cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the chloroplast trnL intron (Pennington et al., 2ooi;
and unpublished data [genera marked by an asterisk*)) and of the chloroplast gene rbcL (Kajita et al., 2001). Clades (e.g., 'Genistoid', 'Aldinoid') are well·
supported monophyletic groups that have been given Informal names. Dotted lines Indicate weakly supported ctades. The node congruent with the presen~e
of the 5okb inversion In the chloroplast genome is arrowed. Genera are arranged in groups (marked byverticalllnes) that correspond to smaller monophylellC
groups in the trnL analysis. Genera marked with two asterisks("*) are those for which no molecular data are available, but for which relationships have been
inferred from other features. The system of genera as assigned to the informal groups of Polhill (1994) is also provided in the right-hand column. Castanospermum oustrale Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Uribea tamarindoides Drawing by A./. Beaumont Sweetia fruticosa Drawing by M. Warwick Ormosio amazonica Drawing by A. J. Beaumont Ormosia smithii Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Luetze/burgia auricu/ata Drawing by P. Halliday Haplormosia monophylla Drawing by L. van der Riet
50
Maackia hupehensis Drawing by P. Halliday Phora velutlna subsp. zimbabweensis Photograph by R. Zabeau
'~
0
Salweenia ward/I Drawing by A. J. Beaumont Salweenia wardii Photograph by x. Zhu Comaensia scandens Photograph by G. P. Lewis Dolhousiea bracteata Illustration from Roxburgh, Pl. Coromondel
50
Uleonthus erythrinoides Drawing by A. J. Beaumont Phoro tomentoso subsp. tomentoso Photograph by D. Du Puy
/ Dipterygeae byJ.Barham
The ea rli e r affinitie s of this grou p of gen era are wet forest i.n cti tl'ibocion (Dipte1yx a lso oc urring i .
discussed by Po lhill (1 98 1c). The a n alysis o f C ncral America w ith a sin le pecies to drier ar as i~
Pennington et al. (2001) confirms that the three genera central Brazil, Bolivia and !)araguay , whi le Pterodon
of Dipterygeae form a monophyletic group which is inhabits the d rier areas of a t and central Brazil an,d
sister to eleme nts within Swartzieae sens. lat. and ea t Bolivia . Wood anaLomy ha prov d diagno lie
Sophoreae sens. lat. (Fig. 30). The Amazonian genus parc icL1larly in di. tingu i bing berw n Dipte1y.'I: anci
Monopteryx (treated here in trib e Sophoreae) may Tttralea (Gasson, 1999), and Lhis has u nderpinn d u1e
belong with this group (Lima, p ers. comm .). Two of the concl usions of Lewi & Gas on 2000). Th tribe as
three genera in Dipte1ygeae are essentially Amazonian tre Led here comprise c. 22 species.
-
--- Swartzieae sens. strict. (see page 216)
The tribe is geographically disjunct, compnsmg a Polhill (1994) placed Brongniartieae next to
araphyletic group of tropical American genera Bossiaeeae, partly because Crisp & Weston (1987)
rcyclolobiun·1, Poecilanthe, Harpalyce and Brongniartia), removed the Australian Templetonia group from the
and nested within it, a monophyletic group of Australian latter and placed it in Brongniartieae. Polhill (I.e.),
genera (Templetonia , Hovea, Cristonia, Tbinicola and however, noted that their very different alkaloid
umprolohium). The Australian genus Plagiocarpus profiles suggested Brongniartieae and the Templetonia
apperu: to be more closely related to the neotropical group had an affinity to the genistoid tribes, while
Brongniartitt than to the other Australian genera. tribe Bossiaeeae was more closely related to Mirbelieae,
Arroyo (1981) considered the tribe to comprise the Hypocalyptus (now in Hypocalypteae), a group of Old
two genera Brongniartia and Harpalyce, both from World tropical tribes (including Indigofereae, Millettieae
the Neotropics, so that the concept of Brongniartieae and Phaseoleae) and the Hologalegina group of tribes.
has expanded considerably . The Australian Recent phylogenetic analyses, especially those using
Templetonia group was transferred on the basis of a DNA sequences (e.g., Crisp et al., 2000; Doyle et al.,
cladistic analysis of morphology (Crisp & Weston, 2000; Hu, 2000; Pennington et al., 2000a; Hu et al.,
1987), and recently two new genera have been 2000; 2002; Wojciechowski et al., 2004) support a
described in this group, Cristonia and Tbinicola (Ross, placement of Brongniartieae either next to, or within,
ZOOla). Two more neotropical genera (Cyclolobium the main clade of genistoid tribes, which includes
and Poecilanthe) have been transferred into the tribe Sophoreae sens. lat., Euchresteae, Thermopsideae,
on the evidence of DNA sequences and phytochemistry Podalyrieae, Crotalarieae and Genisteae. Pennington et
(Crisp et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2002). A putative new al. (2001), Kajita et al. (2001) and Wink & Mohamed
genus from Bahia, Brazil is under study by Queiroz, (2003) place Brongniartieae sister to a clade including
Lewis and Wojciechowski. Current molecular data Sophoreae sens. strict. , Thermopsideae, Podalyrieae,
indicate its sister relationships are to Harpalyce and Crotalarieae and Genisteae. The tribe as treated here
Poecilanthe, but formal description of the new genus comprises 10 genera (not including the putative new
awaits further analysis. genus) and c. 152 species (Fig. 32).
Cyclolobium
z
Poecllanthe fT1
~
Genus nov.? ~
0 OJ
;:o ;::c
Harpalyce r
0
Cl
z
Brongniartia G'l
z
Plaglocarpus
)>
;::c
Templetonia )> -i
c IT1
i'-lovea l/l
-l )>
;:o IT1
)>
Cristonia r
)>
ThinicaJa
Lamprolobium
FIG. 32 Diagram of relationships in tribe Brongniartleae after Crisp et al. (2000); Thompson et al. (2001); Hu et al. (2002)
LEFT Hovea pungens Photograph by M, D. Crisp
Cyc/olobium brasiliense Photograph by G. P. Lewis Harpalyce arborescens Photograph by C. E. Hughes Harpalyce sp. (from Cuba) Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Polhill Cl981r) followed Ohashi (1973b) in recognising upports th groupi~g f Euchresta and ·ophora, and
the monogeneric tribe Euchresteae based on the genus the ana ly i c f Kapta et al. (2001) ven s LLggests
Euchresta (c. 4 species). Eucbresta may be mb dded within opbora. As
Euchresta was previously included in subtribe traditionaJJy circumscribed, ophora is polyphyletic
Geoffroeeae of tribe Dalbergieae and was believed to (Kass & Wink, 1997; Crisp et al., 2000; Pennington et
be intermediate between this and subtribe al., 2001) with certain elements, e.g., Styphnolobium
Lonchocarpinae (Bentham, 1860, as 'Lonchocarpeae'). and Calia probably falling outside the Genistoid clade
Recent molecular evidence places Euchresta in the (Wojciechowski et al., 2004).
Sophora group of the core genistoids (Doyle et al., A new, more narrowly circumscribed Sophoreae
1997; 2000; Crisp et al., 2000), supporting previous sens. strict. will thus have to include Euchresteae
hypotheses of a close affinity with Sophora (Ohashi & (providing the type species of Sophora, S. tomentosa
Sohma, 1970; Ohashi, 1973b; Polhill (198lr: 402); L., belongs with the taxa so far sampled from subgenus
Polhill, 1994; Chen et al., 1992; Matsuura et al., 1994). Sophora (sensu Tsoong & Ma, 1981).
Crisp et al. (2000) note evidence that strongly
FIG. 33 Diagram of relationships of tribe Euchresteae to neighbouring tribes mainly after Crisp et al. (2000); Kajita et al. (2001) Euchresta hors{ieldii Drawing by P. Halliday
'f ditionally, the mall tril ' Tb rm psideae includ combining molecular and phytochemical data (e .g .,
: gen era with a toraJ. o'. (43)-45- (46) spe ·ies Kass & Wink, 1995; Wink & Mohamed , 2003), all
r cl rhrougb th med1rerran an and temp rate associated Thermopsicleae with Genisteae, and placed
sea lre
regions of America, tbe Meditemrnean Basin and C them as part of the 'core genistoids' (Thermopsideae,
ro NE ASia (Turner, 1981). Recent molecular data, Sophoreae sens . strict., Euchresteae, Podalyrieae,
nQwever no w places Pickeringia Wilhin the Cladrasc:is- Crotalarieae and Genisteae). The Thermopsideae form
s1yphnolo bi ~1 m clade in the basal Papili noideae a clacle sister to Sophoreae sens. strict. in some analyses
(Wojciech w kl el al., 2004). 17.1ermopsis .it. el f o ur (e.g., Crisp et al., 2000 [where Thermopsideae is
in borh N America and E A ia, and Bc1pt'isic1 is stro ngly supported as monophyletic] and Wink &
exclusively N American. The two species of Anagyris Mohamed, 2003). In other analyses, however, a
occur around the Mediterranean Basin and in monophyletic Thermopsicleae is not supported (e.g.,
Macaronesia. Piptanthus and Ammopiptant!nts occur in Kass & Wink, 1995; Kajita et al., 2001; Wojciechowski
E Asia. The tribe as a whole is absent from the S et al., 2004). In the latter analysis elements of the tribe
Hemisphere. The free stamens have always marked are nested separately within a paraphyletic Sophoreae
the tribe ;1s distinct, and have led some to associate it sens. strict. The combined Sophoreae sens. strict.-
with Sophoreae. Its ea rliest placement (e.g., Bentham, Thermopsic.leae clade is sister to a Podalyri eae-
1865) wcis in his Podalyrieae, in which he included Crotalarieae-Genisteae clacle. Ammopiptanthus does
C)'clopia ancl Podalyria , as well as many genera now not appear to have been sequenced to elate and its
placed in Mirbelieae. However, anatomical and placement here is based on comments by Turner
phytochcmical work (summarised by Turner, 1981) (1981). A recircurnscribecl Thermopsicleae, excluding
points to a closer relationship with Genisteae. Pickeringia (Fig. 34), thus reqt1 ires further study to
Molecular analyses (e.g., Pennington et al., 2001; ascertain its tribal composition and validity.
Kajita et al., 2001; Wojciechowski, 2003) and studies
Pickeringia
-i
Ammopiptanthus? :r:
rn
Anagyris ;;o
Piptanthus $
0
-0
Vl
Thermopsis 0
rn
Baptisia )>
rn
FIG, 34 Diagram of relationships in tribe Thermopsideae after Turner (1981); Crisp et al. (2000); Wink & Mohamed (2003); Wojciechowski et al. (2004)
LEFT Th
ermapsis barbata Photograph by P. J. Cribb
Pickerlngia Nutt. ex Torr. & A.G 1~1y 1840 Piptanthus Sweet 1828
I sp; N America (W USA [California to Baja Ca lifornia! and adjacent ~ lexico)
2 spp.; S Hirnabyas (India , I3huw n, Ne pal, Myanmar (13urma] and \Y/ Chin a)
Named after Charles Pickering (1805-1878), American hot<mist, zoologist and F1'om piplo- (Gk.: fa ll) and an/hos (Gk.: flower); the flo1al parts foll togethe1 after
anthropologist anthesis so rh e1'e is no calyx on the young pod
Shru bs; mecliterranean bushland (chaparral), open wootlland :md thicket, often Shrubs; montane grassl~md, thicket and forest margins
on dry slopes and in w:Jshes Reference(s): Tu mer (1980)
Refe rence(s): Hickman 0993: 641); lsely (1998: 801 - 802) Peng & Yuan (1992) recognise thre e species
Two varieries are recognised; Tu1 ne1 ' (1981) considered this robe ;111 isobtcd Piptanlhus neprilensis (Hook ,) Sweet (evergreen laburnum) is grown as an
genus with ri base chromosome number of x = 7 co mpared to x = 9 or 10 in the 0 1rnimc ntal
rest of the rribe; lupine alkaloids are .:dso reportedly absent in Pfr;ke1·f11gia ancl
pie.sent in othe r gene ra which have been tested; Wojciechowski el rJ/ , (2004) have
Pickeringia nested, with strong .<;upport, in rhe Cl::iclrnstis -Styphnolobium cla<le in
Thermopsis lLBr. ex W.T.Aiton 1811
rhe ba.sal Papilio noideae c. 23 spp. [but see below]; C ancl E Asia (Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan to Mongo lia,
Pickeringin m o11Jana NurL ex Torr. & A.Gray (chaparrnl pea) is a wildli fe (deer) Russia [Siberia and Far Eastl, Chim, Japan and south to the Himakiyas [13 spp D
foiage and N Amclic1 (\Y/ Canada to S Dakora, New Mexico and C\lifornia; anll N
Carolina and Tennessee to Alabama and Georgia k . 10 spp.)
Fmm thermos (Gk.: Jupin) and -apsis (Gk.: appearance), refeffing to the
Ammopiptanthus s .H,Che ng 1959 1escmbl::tnce of rhe yellow-flowere d inflore.scenccs to lupins
Herbs; ma inly n-1ontane warm ;md contincnral tempe1':ite to suha1cric woodland ,
1-2 spp; C Asia (Kyrgyzstan and W China 10 Mongol ia)
foiest margins, shmbland, grassland, desert orncl nmdi"a (in As ia) and
Fro1n ammo- (Gk.: sa nd) a nd Piptanlbus (q.v.)
mediterr~mean shrubland and thi cke t (charparal), forest, woodland and grassland
Shrubs; conrine nrnl rempcra rc shrublancl, montan e dese1t ;ind open com1nuni tie5
of stony c.lry pl ~ 1 ces and rocks (in N America)
Refere nce(s): Peng & Yuan 0992); Che n el al. 0994); Ya kovlev el al. 0996); Iscly
Refe re nce(s): Che ng (1959); Peng & Yuan 0992); Yakovlev el al. (1996)
Used as ~in o rnamental and A ~ mongolicus (Maxim. ex Kom.) SJ-I.C heng is a 0998: 863-87 1)
lsc ly Cl 998) considers the genus to comprise 8-10 srecics ancl treats the
so urce of antifreeze proteins for reducing the freezing point of solutions
Ame1ican taxa as Ii species (2 in \YI USA [ancl adjace nt Canada! and 2 in SE USA)
Used as ornamentals (e.g., T rho111hifo/ia (Pursh) Ric hal'<lson va r. monlana (Nutt.)
Isley, golden pea or golden banner); other 'fol.'ie lupin' species are so metimes
Anagyrls L 1753
weeds an<l a1e used in medicine and for e1osion control
2 spp.; Meditenane~in and \Y/ Asia (Cana1y Is., S Europe, N Africa , Tu rkey. Middle
E:tst to Iinn, Sa udi Arabia a nd N Yemen); introduced in Malll itius
Fwm anagyros the Greek name for A Joelie/a L. (stinking bea n tJ'efoH); ,ii.so
Baptisia VenL 1808
a11a- (Gk.: again) a nd gyro (Gk.: round), refe rring to 1he curved r ods
15 - 17 s pr.; E (SE coasta l rlain) a nd C USA (SC Si;Ites to slightl y adjacent Canada)
Shrubs; mediterranean bushland, deciduous woo<lkrnd and thicker, on rocky
From baplo-, haplein (Gk.: to dip, to dip in dye , colour); the plants have been
slopes
used as a n jndigo substirurc
Reference(s): Perez clc Paz (1975)
Herbs; con rincncal a nd wa1m tempe1me grassland and open woodla nd, along
Toxic ~ind thus unpalatable to stock, lea ves and seeds used for medicine; al.so
st1 e<1ms ;;incl in sandy or JOcky areas
used as ornamen tals and inclicatol's of degraded Janel
l\ercrencc(s): L>uisey (1940); Jsely 0998: 454 - 464)
fn1 e1'.s pecific hyb ridisation is comm o n
Used as 0 1 narnentals (e.g., B . austrafis (L.) R Br,, or blue wilcl indigo), fo1 · ground
cove!', me dicine ancl dyes (e.g~, B linctoria (L) RJJ 1•., oi· false indigo); unpal~tab l e
to s1ock
Bapt' ·
Anogyris foetido Photograph by J. Hooper isia austro/is Photograph by I. K. Ferguson
====~"tt·•- -- ·
dlUll & Vai \'X~yk c1?98'1) u~nn.1ari ~d recent ha~ges presence o f uniqu e quinolizidin e a nd piperidyl
generic and m bal circwn cripoons m th Podalyn ae alkaloids, the absence of canavanine, the absence of
~o d Liparieae. T he Liparieae has b en formally placed proa nthocyanidins an d the presence o f esters of
1 hydroxylated anthocyanins in purple-flowered taxa. A
'. n synonymy und r Poclalyrieae, a wa also sugge ted
~y Polhill (19 l o : 396-397 39 and Kas & Wink clear-cut dichotomy (sprouting versus non-sprouting)
(l997), but th g nu. Hypoa1/ypt.u was excluded a nd exists in the fire-survival strategy of many mediterranean
.given triba l ta tu a the Hypocalyptea ( 'chmt & shrubla nd legumes an d this feature is particula rly
VaJ1 wyk, l998b). The g nu Coelidium Veg I ex Walp. relevant in the Podalyrieae (Schutte et al., 1995).
was ubseq ue otly re d uc d to s yno n ymy wiLh.in The Podalyrieae belongs to a mo nophyletic clade,
Ampl.litbcilea Ec kl. Z yh. chutt , 1998) . T h i the 'core genistoids ' which includes Crotalarieae,
treaunenl ~ Uow Va n Wyk & chutte 1995a but Genisteae, Podalyrieae, Thermopsideae, Euchresteae
reflects several more recent modifications and revisions and Sop h o reae sen s . strict. (Crisp et al., 2000;
(referen es give n below . p ci in Lhe tri e are Ii ted Pennington et al. , 2001 ; Wojciechowski et al. , 2004). In
b)' konki et ctl. 2003 . As pr s ntly circumscribed, the Crisp et a l. (2000) a nd Wink & Mo hamed (2003) ,
tribe includ s 8 e nera and 125 p i (Fig. 35 . Podalyrieae is sister to a clade comprising the Old
It is interesting to note that taxonomic modifications World Crotalariea e a nd the Genisteae , the latter
based on detailed analyses of morp hology, cytology incorporating the 'African Genisteae', i.e. Argyrolobium,
and chemist1y (Schutte & Van Wyk, 1998a & b) have Dichilus, Melolobium and Polhillia (see Van Wyk &
subsequently been su pported by molecular evidence Schutte, 1995a) . Cadia (in Sophoreae sens. lat.) is
(e.g., Crisp et al., 2000; Van der Bank et al., 2002; Wink b asally branching to Podalyrieae in the analysis of
& Mohammed, 2003). Secondary metabolites have Kajita et al. (2001) and Wink & Mohamed (2003), and
contribu ted substantially to the curre nt generic and the Podalyrieae-Crotalarieae-Genisteae clade is sister
tribal concepts. These include, amongst others, the to a Thermopsideae - Sophoreae sens. strict. clade.
Cyclopia
Xiphotheca
Amphithalea
""O
0
Stirtonanthus 0
;r::.
~
;;c
Podalyria rn
;r::.
rn
Lipari a
Virgili a
Calpurnia
FIG. 35 Diagram of relationships in tribe Podalyrleae after Van Wyk & Schutte (1995a); Van der Bank et al. (2002)
LEFT 0YeIop1a
.
maculata Ph otograph by B.-E. Van Wyk
Related to Amphilhalea, which togethe r' form sub11•ibe Xipbo lbeci11ae A LSchutte
rogerhe r with DNA sequence data, .show that tl1 e genus is monophyletic (see Van
(sec Schutte & Van Wyk, 1998a)
t!e 1· !lank el al., 2002); Sli11011ia A.L.Srn , (1926) is a name cunently in use for a
genus of lichens
nt state of knowledge of the Crotalarieae was well supported by molecular evidence (Crisp et al.,
by Van Wyk (199la) and by Van Wyk & 2000; Wink & Mohamed, 2003) and by cladistic
a) . The most conspicuous .recent clun~e analyses of morphological, cytological and chemical
0995 characters (Van Wyk & Schutte, 1995a). The latter study
the exclusion of the Argyrolobzum group (six
i.e. Argyrolobium , Dichilus, Melo/obium, suggested an early diversification of the genera with
.,' Anartbrophyllum and Sellocharis) which uniform anthers and lupanine-type esters of
,a, 1 . C 1 . quinolizidine alkaloids (Pearsonia, Rothia and
in tribe Genisteae rather t 1an m rota aneae,
they were previously placed (Polhill, 198lq: 399 Robynsiopbyton) followed by the poorly known
. New insights into relationships within the tribe Spartidium and then the so-called 'Cape group of
come mainly from chernosystematic studies of genera' (Polhill, 198lq: 399- 402), which now includes
cir (summarised in Van Wyk & Verdoorn, 1990) Lotononis and Crotalaria. Relationships between the
em! recent generic monographs (see below). seven genera of the 'Cape group' remains unresolved
Crotalarieae forms part of a monophyletic clade, despite several recent molecular studies because
'G©re genistoicls' (Fig. 36) which also includes sampling is still relatively poor. However, a basally
e, Poclalyrieae, Thermopsideae, Brongnia1tieae, branching position in the tribe of the 'Cape group',
teae and Sophoreae sens. strict. (Crisp et al., notably Leheckia and Wihorgia - as considered by
Pennington et al., 2000a; Kajita et al., 2001) . Polhill (1976, 1981q) - is now accepted here. The
·eae appears to be sister to the Genisteae and exclusion of the Argyrolobium group, based on
are sister to the Poclalyrieae (Crisp et al., 2000; morphological and chemical characters, is also strongly
howski et al., 2004). This clade is in turn sister supported by DNA sequence data. Due to reticulate
'Fhermopsicleae and Sophoreae sens. strict. and overlapping patterns of character state distribution
g Euchresteae). in the Crotalarieae sens. strict., generic delimitations are
Crotalarieae shares with the Podalyrieae the intricate and subject to misinterpretation. Several of
t"C! of a-pyriclone alkaloids such as cytisine and the large and diverse genera appear to be either
ine that are a typical feature of all other 'core monophyletic or paraphyletic depending on the choice
oid' tribes. Despite a lack of defining characters, of characters. As currently circumscribed the tribe
onophyly of the tribe as circumscribed here is includes 11 genera and c. 1204 species (Fig. 37).
Ctritolar/a m.
icons Photograph by D. Du Puy
Sophoreae p.p.
-
Brongniartieae (see page 253)
---
II Thermopsideae (see page 263)
I
Crotalarieae
I
I Genisteae (see page 283)
FIG . 36 Diagram of relationships of tribes in the Genistoid clade (i.e., core-genistoids), after Crisp et al. (2000); Pennington et al. (2oooa); WoJ Lebeck/a macrantha Photograph by B.-E. Van Wyk
et al. (2004)
- Spartidium ?
1976) but the genelic concept is supported by the accumulation of ammodend rine
(a bipiperidyl alkaloid) and the virt<1al absence of the characteristic quinoli zidine
alka loids of Lebeckia (Van Wyk et al., 1989); the genus may thus be better placed
in Gen isteae
• k & Mohamed
FIG . 37 Diagram of relationships of genera in tribe Crotalarieae after Polhill (1976; 1981q); Van Wyk & Schutte (1995a); Wm
esooJ>
.5. R-C.
Bi by (1981: 409-425) divided the Genisteae into calyx and the distinctive quinolizidine alkaloids of the
ubtribes Genistinae and Lupininae, a principal a-pyridone type (Van Wyk & Verdoorn, 1990; Van Wyk
dh'ision taking both morphological and chemical & Schutte, 1995a; Wink & Mohamed, 2003). Van Wyk
ev.idenc into account. Polhill (1976) drew attention to et al. (1989) suggest that Spartidium, currently in the
rh. similarities between woody Thermopsideae Crotalarieae, may be better placed in Genisteae.
(Anagyris and allies) and the main part of Genisteae, More detailed molecular studies are necessary to
and between the herbaceous genera of that tribe, fully assess relationships of the genera. Kass & Wink
Baplisitl and Thermopsis, and Lupinus. Crisp et al. (1997) undertook the first detailed molecular analysis
(2000) emphasise the lability of staminal fusion in of Genisteae using rbcL and ITS sequences, and
genistoic.l tribes as a whole, and it might be supposed limited ITS sampling by Crisp et al. (2000) is largely
dull the free-stamened Thermopsideae would be congruent with this, also supporting a paraphyletic
better included in Genisteae. In recent molecular Argyrolobium. The two southern African species of
analyses (Kass & Wink, 1997; Crisp et al., 2000; Wink Argyrolobium analysed by Crisp et al. (2000) are
&. Mohamed, 2003; Wojciechowski et al., 2004), dispersed within the Genista group Clinked to
howeve r, all Thermopsideae grouped with Sophora Spartium and Retama). Kass & Wink (1997) sampled
<µld close allies, and Lupinus was relatively basally four species of Argyrolobium, two from southern
bran I ing in Genisteae, above the southern African Africa and two from the Mediterranean Region, and
genera Melolobium and Dichilus (previously placed in these are more basally branching in the tribe (Fig.
Crotalarieae). The similarities between Baptisia, 38), although the Mediterranean species A. zanonii
Therm op is and Lupinus are likely due to strong (Turra) P.W.Ball groups elsewhere near the base of
~cologkal convergence in temperate habitats. the Cytisus group. These results are largely supported
The Genisteae forms part of a monophyletic clade, in the chloroplast rbcL analyses of Wink & Mohamed
the 'core genistoids' which also includes Crotalarieae, (2003), with more species of Argyrolobium sampled
Podalyrieae, Thermopsideae, Brongniartieae, and a placement of A. zanonii as sister to the
Euchresteae and Sophoreae sens. strict. (Crisp et al., combined Genista and Cytisus complexes. The ITS
2000; Pennington et al., 2000a; Kajita et al., 2001). analysis of mainly Spanish Genisteae (Pyne, 1999) is
Genisteae appears to be sister to the Crotalarieae and also largely congruent with Kass & Wink 0997),
both are sister to the Podalyrieae (Crisp et al., 2000; except for Argyrolobium where one southern African
Wojciechowski et al., 2004). There is now convincing species groups within the Genista complex and A.
evidence that Melolobium, Dichilus, Argyrolobium and zanonii is basally branching to it. The sequence for
Polhillia (the Argyrolobium clade of Van Wyk & Lembotropis is acknowledged as suspect in the Pyne
Schutte, 1995a), together with Anarthrophyllum (and analysis, and its position allied to Cytisus (as C.
probably Sellocharis), are part of Genisteae and that the nigricans) (Kass & Wink, 1997; Wink & Mohamed,
similarities with the Crotalarieae (the remarkable 2003) is more in agreement with morphological
parallels between Dichilus and Lebeckia for example) evidence. The biggest problem areas remaining,
are superficial only (e.g., Wink & Mohamed, 2003; besides resolving relationships within Argyrolobium,
Wojciechowski et al., 2004). Crisp et al. (2000) are generic delimitation within the Cytisus and
suggested that this group of genera may be sister to Genista groups and the decision whether to recognise
Crotalarieae but their analysis did not include critical a few large, or many small genera. Morphologically,
genera such as Adenocarpus and Lupinus. Less Argyrolobium is more coherent than the current
emphasis is now given to stamen fusion, and these molecular evidence seems to suggest and a broader
genera have been .form~ Jly transferred to Genisteae sampling and reanalysis would be informative. For the
based on the shared presence of a trifid lower lip of the main part of Genisteae, the segregation of the groups
LEFT Lupmus
· weberboueri. Photograph by c. E. Hughes
Melolobium
Dichilus Melolobium macrocalyx Drawing by V. C. Gordon Melolobium wilmsii Photograph by A. E. Van Wyk & 5. Malan
Polhillia
Melolobium Eck l & Zey h 1836
JS spp .; Afri ca (sourhern Africa, including drier areas of Namibia, Botswana a nd S
Argyrolobium pro maj. parte Africa)
From me/o- (Gk : li mb) and -/obion (Gk: a legume o r pod), re fening to the
constrictions in the pods of some species
Lupin us Shrubs and h erbs; mediterran ean shrubl a nd (fy nbos and renosterveld), dese1t,
xerophytic scrubland, bushla nd and thi cket or grass la nd , often on sand,
Anarthrophyllum sometimes in rocky places
Sellocharis? Reference(s): Harvey (1862); Mo teetee & Van Wyk (2001); Schutte in Goldblatt
& Manning (2000: 500); Moteetee el al. (2002); Polhill in Pope el al. (2003:
250-253); Moteetee (2003)
Allied to Dichilus as basally b 1a nching genera in the tribe (Van Wyk & Schutte,
Argyrolobium pro min. parte 1995a; Hu et al, 2002; Wink & Mo hamed, 2003); Melolobium species are. eas ily
recog nised by the auriculate stip ules, gla ndu lar t richomes and (often) spmy
inflorescences
Adenocarpus Used as pasture p la nts a nd as ma terials (e.g ., in bas ketry)
Stauracanthus, Ulex z
)>
rn
? = position in group uncertain
FIG. 38 Diagram of relationships in tribe Genlsteae after Kliss & Wink (t997); Pyne (i999); Crisp et al. (2000); Cubas et al. (2002); Wink & Mohamed
(2003); Pardo et ol. (2004)
Dichilus reflexus Photograph by B.·E. Van Wyk
284 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
TRIBE GENISTEAE 285
Po/hiI/lo conescens Photograph by B. -E. van Wyk Polhi/lio pollens Photograph by c. J. Burgers Argyroloblum ltremoense Photograph by D. Du Puy Lupinus p/losus Photograph by R.B.G., Kew
Lupinus L. 1753
c. 220-230 spp.; Mediterranean basin in Europe to Turkey, Middle East and N
Africa (c. 13 spp.), plus montane E tropical Africa (2 spp.); disjunctly to N
America (c. 120-130 spp.; mainly California and W Rockies to Mexico and C
America) and S America (c. 80-90 spp.; mainly Andes and thinly to Brazil and NE
Argentina), widely introduced elsewhere
Classical name in Latin, possibly derived from lupus, a wolf, on the erroneous
supposition 1h:u these plants impoverish soils
Shrubs and h<-'flJS; mostly open h:ibirnts, in disturbed places, in poor (often acid) soils
Reference(s} Smith 0938-1953); Gladstones (1974); Monteiro & Gibbs (1986);
Barneby (1989b); Hickman (1993); Isely (1998); Kurlovich (2002); Ree et al. (2004)
Isolated in Genisteae (apart from Anarthrophytlum and Sellocharis) and given
separate subtribal status (Bisby, 1981; Talavera & Salgueiro, 1999); species
delimitation is very problematic and no workable infrageneric classification is yet
available; New World species are currently being revised by C.K Hughes
Important as a domesticated human food crop; L. a/bus L. (white lupine, lupini
bean) and L tuteus L. (yellow lupine) From the Mediterranean and L. mutabilis Sweet
(pearl lupine) from the New World are grown for edible, high protein seeds (also for
flour); several species widely grown for livestock fodder, green manure, cover crops,
fish poisons, medicine, oils and as attractive ornamentals (e.g., Russell hybrids of L.
polyphyllus); a number of species are variably toxic and lupinosis causes death in
Polhi/llo obsoleto Photograph by B.-E. Van Wyk LuPmus
· touris Photograph by G. P. Lewis animals, due largely to ingestion of Foliage containing quinolizidine alkaloids
Lupinus conicus Photograph by C. E. Hughes Lupinus sp. 'paniculatus alliance' Photograph by c. E. Hughes Meno carpus comp/icatus Photograph by M. F. Gardner
Q
From erinaceus (L.: rc:;embling a hedgehog), alluding to the spiny tufted habit Pterospw111111 (Spach) K.Koch (1853); Riuasgodaya Esteve 0973)
Subshn.tb; mc<lite rranean shrubland and scrub on limestone and dolomi[e; rocky c..: . 90 spp.; Macaro nesia, N Africa and Europe co Turkey, Midd le East, Caucasus
moun1ain slopes and northeast to Russia, introduced elsewhere
Reference(s): Haynaucl (!989); Ern in Cullen et al (1995: 511); Tala\'CJa in Talaverd From genes/a, genisla (L.: for a broom plant); the name from which che
et al 0999: 208-211) Plantage net kings and queens of England lOok their name Cplanta genisla)
D istinct genus possibly Jllied to Cylisus (on th e ba.si.s of morphological l'viclence) Shrubs and he rbs; forest edges, grassland, medltenanean shrubland (often in
~incl raised to s ubtribal 1ank by Talavcr::i & Salgueiro (1999); molecular evidence rnaquis), rocky mountain slopes, coasts ancl disturbed places
currently inclicares a position in the Genisrinne (or in Ge11isla sens /C1/J near Reference(s): Gibbs (1966; in Tutin et al., 1968: 94 - 100); Gibbs & Dingwell
Retallla or SjJm1iJ1111 (Pyne, 1999; Wink & Mohamed, 2003; Pardo el of, 2004) (1971); Arco (1983); Ern in Cullen et al (1995: 546-549); Talavera in T"lavera et
Erinacea a111byllis Link (hedgehog b1oom) is an at1mctive orn:rn1enta l for 1ock al. (1999: 45-119; 128-137); Percy & Cl'Onk (2002); Pardo et al, (2004)
ga1clens Main genus of the Genistinae but its circumscription is difficult, app~rently
cont<l ining a numbe1 of other genera in the Genistinae in its broadest sense, and
with va1ious segregates commonly recog nised (nm;:ibly Chamaespa11i11111,
Retama H:rf 1838 Pterospar/11111 ancl Teline; e.g ., Yakovlev, 1996 :r nd Talavera el al., 1999) in its
f.ygos Adans (1763) o;:inowest sense The analyses of Pardo el al. (2004) suggest recognising Genis/a
4 spp.; I\'lacamnesia, S Europe, N Af1ica 10 Midd le r:asr, Saudi A1abia and Yemen in the broad sense (i.e ., including the gene ia Retama , Stauracanthus, Ulex and
From the Arabic relem rn• re/am for this broom-li ke hush
Ecbinospmtum ~11nong othe rs) with at le~1 st three subgenera. Teline (Rivasgodayt1)
Shrubs; high mountain slopes, bushland, thic ke t rind grassland ro desc1 1s and Jacks any evident apomorphy and is polyphyleric in the analyses of Cuba:; et al.
sandy coasts, in arid places (2002) and Pardo el al. (2004); it is often conside red intermediate to Cytisus, but
Referen cc(s): Zoha ry (1959) can be clearly distinguished by the oblong keel, ~n apomorphy unique and
\V'cll-clefin ecl genus, p 1obably bas~dly branching in the Genistin:1e 01 within consiste nt within the Genistinae (Gibbs, 1974 ; Polhill, 1976; Bisby, 1981). Talavera
& Salgueiro (1999) revert to an aitificial classification of the subt1'ibe, separating
Gemsta se11s. lat (Zohary, 1959; Polhill, 1976; Crisp et al., 2000; Wink &
Moh"mcd. 20\U: 1'11rclo et"'·· 20011; "°""' :rn:rl)':'<..,. (e.g., Pynl'., 19?9• Ka. •"'
Teline from Genista by the millatc ('strophiolate') seeds (a notably unstable feature
in the tribe, found "lso in sect. Genis/a, see Gibbs, 1974 and Polhill, 1976).
Wink. 1997: Pttrtlo ut al., 2004) pl.ice l?Oltw111 :~ :r m re tlcri•'t'<I cl.,tm:nl "11hln
Genis/a TalaveGJ & Salgueiro 0999) 81so include sect. Chronanlhus from the middle of
Retama mo11ospei·111a (L.) Boiss. (white broom) is grown as ;111 orn;1111cntal C)'tlsus in Teline, beG1use it bas a deeply bifid uppe1 calyx lobe; this is rejected in
the ana lyses of Cubas el al. (2002) and Pardo el al. (2004), who place Cytisus
fontanesii Spach ex Ilall (~ Chronantb11s bijloms (Desf.) Frodin & Heywood)
Gonocytisus spact1 1845 within Cytisinae
A number of species are grown as 0 1namentals; G tinc1011·a L. (clye1"s gree nweed,
3 s pp.; E Mcditerrane~111 region in SE Europe, Tul'key and Middle E.asl
dyer\ broom) was used frnrnerl y as a d ye plant in Eu1'0pe, the yellow d ye from
from .'<onia
. (Gk.: angled), alludi ng to a Cytisus-like pl:tnt w ich angular-,,·tngcd
rhe flowe rs was mixed wit h the blue dye of woad to produce Kendal g1een, a fine
stems
green textile dye; also used (as are ot he r species) for fibre, medicine, ground
Shrubs; woodland and mediten·anean shrubland (maquis), cliffs and d1 y hi llsides;
covci~ low hedging, fo1· perfume (from essenli:ll oils in rhe flowers) and as a
lowland to submOl'Umu~
coffee substitute and condiment
lll.ference(s): Heywood in Tutin el al. (1968: JOI); Gibbs in Davis (1970: 21 - 23 );
Polhill (1976)
Discrele genus allied ro G'enista and Rela111a, but remains to be sampled in
molec..: ul:i r am1lyscs
Alk81oicls in G'o11ocylisus show 8nti-microbial activily
Spartium i 1753
I sp; around th e Me dite minean CS Europe, Tu1key, Middle East a nd N Africa), but
widely cultivated and naturalised (including N Andes in S Am e rica)
From Greek spanon, a name given to a numbe1 of plants like the broom and Slipa
lenacissima L. (a kind o f grass used in weaving and cordage), a llud ing to their habtl
Shrub; mediterranea n sh rubland (maq uis); cliffs, ra vines and d ist u1 bed places
Re fe rence(s} Ake royd in Cullen el al. (1995, 545); Tala vera in Tala ve ra el al.
(1 999, 206-208)
\Xlell known ~me! possib ly basally branching ge nus in the Ge nistinae near
Erinacea (e.g, K{iss & Wink, 1997) or e mbedded within Genislc1sens lat. (Cubas
el al., 2002; Wink & Mo hamed, 2003)
Spmtium junceuni L. (S panish broom, weave rs broom) is wid e ly g1own as an
orna mental and so il stabiliser bur it is read il y in v<isive be co min g <1 nox io us weed;
also used frn its fi bre (for cordage com para ble co jute, made from rh e b r;;mches),
baskc ny , as a dye, perfume (from essential o ils in the flowers), a nd fol' medicine
but the plant is h ig hl y roxic, es peciall y the seeds
to become ::1 w eed a nd highly inflammab le in dry areas; <ilso L1sed ::is a tea
Lab
Ulex europaeus Photograph by G. P. Lewis (infused from rhe fl o we rs), as orn<1me ntals, d yes a nd fo ewood urnum anogyroides Photograph by B. D. Schrire
j\Jilorpheae byJ.M.Lock
The A.morpheae were expanded by Bentham (1865) as that the papilionoid flower of the more derived species
ubtribe 'Psoralieae ' of his ~ery broadly drawn of Dalea may have evolved independently from that of
(i~le.geae. The latter also contained the genera now other papilionoids, but this hypothesis is rejected by
,1aced in Indigofereae, Brongniartieae, Millettieae, and McMahon & Hufford (2004), based on studies of floral
kobinieae, as well as in the present restricted (but still development in Dalea, Marina and Psorothamnus
hererog n Ott Galegeae sens. lat. Both Gray's and (McMahon & Hufford, 2002) .
Bentham's concepts of Psoralieae included genera here Molecular work (Doyle, 1995) initially placed
placed in Amorpheae, as well as a broadly Amorpheae among the New World tropical tribes,
.ircums ri bed Psoralea . Borissova (Nov. 1964) as sister to a clade comprising Lotus and members of
propo eel a tribe Amorpheae containing the single the IRLC clade. More recently (e.g., Doyle et al.,
genu Amorpha. Almost simultaneously, Hutchinson 2000; Pennington et al., 2001 ; Kajita et al., 2001),
(De . 1964) introduced a tribe Daleeae (as 'Daleae') Amorpheae emerges as one of a number of equally-
in luding four genera : Dalea, Thornbera, ranked groups with the Dalbergioid and Genistoid
Petafoste1non, and Kuhnistera, the last three placed clades. Lavin et al. (2001a) included sequences from
as synonyms of Dalea by Barneby (1977). four genera of Amorpheae (Apoplanesia,
Hutchinson attempted to use petal insertion as the Eysenhardtia, Amorpha and Marina) as part of their
character separating Daleeae and Psoraleeae, but study of the Dalbergioid clade . Three analyses, each
Barneby (1977) showed that Hutchinson's definition based on a different gene, a nd one combined
and interpretation of this character were unsatisfactory. analysis using both molecular and morphological
Barneby (1977, 1981) added Apoplanesia, Eysenhardtia, data, all agreed firstly in placing Amorpheae as sister
Panyella, Amorpha, Errazurizia, Psorothamnus, and to the whole Dalbergioid clade, and secondly in
Marina, all formerly placed in Psoraleeae, to supporting the monophyly of Amorpheae. This is
Hutchinson's (1964) Daleeae to produce the concept confirmed in subs equent analyses (e .g.,
of Amorpheae as accepted here. Wojciechowski, 2003; Wojciechowski et al., 2004;
The main character distinguishing Amorpheae lies McMahon & Hufford, 2004) . All genera in the tribe
in the inflorescence position, which is terminal in were sequenced in the analysis of McMahon &
Amorpheae and axillary in Psoraleeae. Additionally, Hufford (2004) and two well supported clades were
the leaves of Amorpheae are basically pinnate recognised: the Amorphoid clade comprising
(although sometimes trifoliolate or unifoliolate by Parryella, Amorpha, Apoplanesia, Errazurizia and
reduction), while those of Psoraleeae are basically Eysenhardtia; and the Daleoid clade with
trifoliolate (although sometimes palmately >3-foliolate Psorothamnus , Marina and Dalea (Fig . 39) .
or even pinnate). The basic chromosome number Psorothamnus is paraphyletic in the latter study with
appears to be 1O in Amorpheae (reduced in some two monophyletic clades dividing neatly along
species of Dalea) but 11 in Psoraleeae. Stirton (1981a) taxonomic lines. One of these, the Psorodendron
added further characters that reinforce the distinction: clade, is basally branching in the Daleoid clade and
the form of the cotyledons, the positions of the embryo McMahon & Hufford (2004) state that this will be
and radicle in the seed, seed shape, fruit structure, resurrected at generic level, thus recognising 9
and the pollen. Ferguson & Skvarla (1981) also pointed genera in the tribe. For this account, however,
out that the pollens of Psoraleeae and Am rpheae Amorpheae is treated as comprising 8 genera and
have very little in common. Barneby (1977) ug ted (245) - 247 - (248) species (Fig. 39) .
LEFT p
sorothamnus spinosus Photograph by R. Spellenberg
Apoplanesia )>
s::
· Parryella 0
;;u
"O
Amorpha :::c
0 )>
Errazurizia
0
n
s Apoplonesio poniculoto
cu
0..
0 Apop/ones/o poniculato Photograph by C. E. Hughes Photograph by G. P. Lewis
(1)
;:;o
Eysenhardtia "lJ
Apopla11esia c.Frest 1832
1 sp.; S Mexico, Nicaragua to Ve nezuela
I From apoplanesis (Gk~: aberration. leading astray), referring to the structure oF che
Psorodendron clade 0 rn flowers w hich is unusual w ithin Papilionoideae, hav ing 5 free petals o n the 1im of
a hypa nthium
)> )>
I
Sma ll trees; seasona lly d1y tropica l fo1est and woodland, hillsides, river valleys
Psorothamnus sens. strict. m rn and roadsides
0 Refe1e nce(s). McVaugh (1987: 280-281); McMa hon & Hufford (2004)
In the ana lyses of McMahon & Hufford (2004), th e ge nu s is either basally
0 brnnching in the Amorphoid clacle (based on ITS sequence dara only) or sister to
Marina n the Errazurizia-Eysenhmdtia subc\ade (in the trnK-matK analysis and the
cu
0..
combined analysis with ITS data)
The wood of A. paniculata C.Presl (cl1ulul) is veiy hard and used fo r cabine t1y,
Dalea (1)
cr<i fts and bows; the bark yields a yellow dye ; also used as ornamentals and in
agroforestiy
10
FIG. 39 Diagram of relationships of the tribe Amorpheae after Lavin et al. (2001a); McMahon & Hufford (2004) Parryel/a filifolio Drawing by P. Holliday
Amorpho fruticoso Photograph by G. P. Lewis Amorpho nano Photograph by G. P. Lewis Eysenhardtia orthocorpo Photograph by c. E. Hughes Psorothomnus schottii Photograph by R. Spellenberg
'fhe pr · nr circum. cription of Dalbergieae sens. hit. two centres within the Dalbergieae: one including
cenrnin radical hang ~ to Dalbe rgieae sen u. Polhill Andira, Hymenolobium, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis,
(1981d : 233 - 2 2). In th fir ·r in ta n e it take a and the second the remaining genera. Most recently
rraditional view of the trib by in lu ling genera uch a several molecular and morphological studies (e.g., Lavin
vatairea and Vataireopsis (now in the Vataireoid clade, eta/., 200la; Pennington et al., 2001; Wojciechowski et
see Figs. 1 & 40) and Andira and Hymenolobium, al., 2004) confirm that these four genera do not belong
which in Wojciechowski et al. (2004) are sister to the in the Dalbergioid clade. Since there is, however, still
combined Dalbergioid clade of Lavin et al. (2001a), much work to be done to resolve the phylogenetic
plus Amorpheae. The bulk of the treatment, however, relationships of these four genera, they have been kept
recognises the cryptic Dalbergioid clade (Lavin et al., in tribe Dalbergieae sens. lat. in this treatment to avoid
200la) as comprising tribe Dalbergieae sens. lat., tentative placements, which might be treated by users
diagnosed by the synapomorphy of aeschynomenoid as formal.
coot nodules. This clade includes all the genera placed The tribe Aeschynomeneae sensu Rudd (1981)
in the Dalbergieae sensu Polhill (198ld: 233- 242), the contained 25 genera characterised by lomentaceous
Aeschynomeneae sensu Rudd 0981) and the pods, although some members lack laments (e.g.,
Adesmieae sensu Polhill 0981g: 355- 356), plus Arachis, Ormocarpopsis, Diphysa spp., Ormocarpum
subtribe Btyinae of the Desmodieae sensu Ohashi et al. spp., and Pictetia spp .). None of the Aeschynomeneae
(1981) as well as the genus Diphysa (tribe Robinieae had previously been considered closely related to the
sensu Polhill & Sousa (1981)). The placements of all Dalbergieae, but the work of Lavin et al. (2001a) has
members of the Dalbergioid clade within the resolved all the 'aeschynomenoid genera' within the
classification presented here and in those of Polhill Dalbergioid clade.
Cl981cl: 233-242; 198lg: 355- 356), Polhill & Sousa The taxonomic history of the monogeneric tribe
0981), Ohashi et al. (1981) and Rudel (1981) are listed Adesmieae sensu Polhill 0981g) is ve1y different from
in Fig. 40. that of the Dalbergieae. The Adesmieae combines the
Dalbergieae sensu Polhill (198ld) contained 19 presumed plesiomorphic trait of free stamen filaments,
genera defined by woody habit, supposedly with presence of lomentaceous pods that are
plesiomorphic flowers, pods with a specialised seed supposedly derived . This combination of features
chamber and seeds that accumulated alkaloids. Polhill suggested a taxonomically isolated position far
Cl981cl) noted that there seemed to be two centres removed from the Dalbergieae. The analyses of Lavin
Within the Dalbergieae: one around Andira with et al. (2001a) based on molecular sequence and
Hymenolobium, Vatairea, Vataireopsis, Dalbergia, and morphological data, however, suppo1tAdesmia (nested
MC1che1erium and o n around Pter caipu . He , 1 o together with five genera of Rudd's Aeschynomeneae)
highlighted evidence from wo d a natomy (Ba r ua- being sister to the Pterocarpus and Dalbergia clades.
Kuip rs 19 1) bi h showed that An.dira, The neotropical genera Brya and Cranocarpus
Hymenolobium, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis have coarser were placed together in a new subtribe Bryinae of
Wood structur more typical of members of the Desmodieae in the classification of Ohashi et al. (1981).
Ophorea than the r maining mem be rs of the The features common to these genera are periporate
DaJbe rgieae. The study of fruit and edling pollen and glochidiate hairs or glandular trichomes.
lllorphology by Lima 0990) further supported these In the molecular studies of Doyle et al. 0995) and
0997), therefore, suggested that Brya and Cranocarpus A1tbroca1pum which Thulin 1999 synonynii ed nd Hymenolobium Dalbergieae
should be removed from the Desmodieae. Their Chapmannict. In this treatm nt 9 gen rn and ~~der Andira Dalbergi eae
findings were strongly corroborated by the three gene - 1325-(133 1 sped : a r recogni5ed in I alb r . 19)
analyses of Lavin et al. (200la) which place the two 1
·ens. kt!. In lucl ing 4. ba ally branching da ll ~ ~ • Amorpheae (see page 299)
that placed Diphysa with the Aeschynomeneae rather Pterocarpus clade: _2 genera; c. 200 ·p cics ntred Cranocarpus Desmodieae
Pterocarpus subtribe Bryinae
than the Robinieae. In the phylogenetic analyses of in the Neotr pi ·s, Pterocmpw and lylosu11tbe·a re clade
Brya
Lavin et al. (200la), Diphysa is reso lve d in the paniropi al, lnocarpu A. ian, and bapmannfa Platymiscium Dalbergiea e
Dalbergioid clade nested within the 'transatlantic clade' transatlantic.
Platypodium Dalbergieae
(Fig. 40), first identified by Lavin et al. (2000). Dalbergia clade: 17 genera; c. 706 species which are lnocarpus Dalbergieae
Finally, since 1981 four new genera have been pantropical, but nn· d in Africa ; lfleberl auerella Maraniona Dalbergieae
Tipuana Hughes et al. (2004)
published: the Brazilian monotypic Grazielodendron Soemmeringia, Pictetia and Diphy ct a r ne tr pica!'. Dalbergieae
Ramorinoa
(Lima, 1983b), the possibly exti n ct Madagascan Machaerium transatlanti c, Dalbergia and Centrolobium Dalbergieae
endemic Peltiera (Labat & Du Puy, 1997), Zygocarpum, Aeschynomene are pantropical, and Geissaspis Asian. Dalbergioid Paramachaerium Dalbergieae
cl ade Etaballia Dalbergieae
the Horn of Africa - Arabian segregate of Ormocarpum Isolated genera: 4 genera ; 58 species, neotropical Dalbergieae
Pterocarpus
(Thulin & Lavin, 2001) and Maraniona from northern except Andira, which has one amphiatlantic species.
Cascaronia Dalbergieae
Geoffroea Dalbergieae
Fissicalyx Dalbergieae
Fiebrigiella Ormocarpin ae
Chapmannia Stylosanthinae
Stylosanthes Stylosanthinae
Ara chis Stylosanthinae
Isolated position
Dalbergia Dalbergieae
Machaerium Dalbergieae
Aeschynomene subgen . Ochopodium Aeschynomeninae
Pictetia Ormocarpinae
Diphysa Robinie ae
Zygocarpum Th ulin & Lavin (2001)
Ormocarpum Ormocarpinae
Ormocarpopsis Ormocarpinae
Peltiera Labat & Ou Puy (1997)
Isolated position
Weberbauerella Poiretiinae
FIG. 40 Diagram of relationships and Informal groups in tribe Dalbergieae sens. lat. after Lavin et al. (2001a) and placement in Polhill & Raven (1981:
2
33-242; 283-288; 292-296; 347-356) where genera formerly placed in tribe Aeschynomeneae are here referred to by subtribe
Adesmia graci/is (515 a-g), A. guttu/ifera (516 a-d) Drawing by J. E. Lacour Adesmia sp. Photograph by P. J. M. Moos Zornio - various spec ies Drawing by J. M. Fothergill Zornio sp. Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Platypodium Voge l 1837 Maraniona C.E.Hughes, G .1'.Lewis, Daza & Reyne! 2004
1-2 spp; C ~incl S Am eri ca ( P~nama, Col o mbia, Venezuela, I31':1zil, 1'uli via t111d 1 sp ..; N Pel'u (Cajam:oin::a, Ama zo nas)
Pmagu"y) Namecl after th e dry inter-Andean Mnr:iilon Vc1lley (N Peru) where this ~ind a
Fm 111 platy- (Gk.: brot1cl, flat) anclpodfo11 (Gk.: fo o t), re ferrin g to th e ~: 1111a1oid number of o th er locnlised legume endernics haYc bee n discovered
Small tii:!e ; tro pi Gil seasonally dry t'orest ;rn<l thorn sc rub o n steep rocky slopes, in
fr tlit with a broad win g :tt th e base (the s ~ed c ha mber is at the ;1pcx)
Trees 20-30 m; seasonall y chy cropkal 01• humid gallcty or rive1in e fo1t~ sr , thi cket a na nu w eleva tionc1l zone between 1400 and 1600 m
and woodbnd Refe1en ce( s), Hughes el al. ( 2001)
ltcfe1·encc(s), Ayma1d in llen)' et al. (1999, 377 - 378) 1Harcmio11a /avin ii C.E.Hughes, G .P.Lcwis, 0~1z::1 & Hcy nel is considered most
Placed by Polhill (1 98 !d, 233 - 212) in lribe Dolbc rgieae; Lavin el al (20ll lco ) . closely related to Tip11a11a in a combined c hlo1oplast 11wtK-1r11K DNA and n o n-
b11se d o n DNA sequ e nce c lat~1, resolved Pfal)jJodi11111 in the l)lcroG llTJU S cladc rnolccular ~1nal ys i s (nlthougb with out b o otst1 ':1p supp o rt)
(rig, ,10)
Used fo r timbe r, e.g., P. eleg m1s Vogel (carcuc ia, coslilla, t1rbol soga , t; 111 ;1lua,
carwl c to) in house constru ccion, fur•niturc, tools ; 111d for decor'ation
I
I I Pterocorpus rohrll, sens. lat. Photograph by c. E. Hughes
Geo{froea splnosa Photog raph by G. P. Lewis
Arthrocatpum Balf.f. (1882); Pachecoa Stand!. & Steyenn. 0943) used for medidne
7 spp.; New World (I sp. in Mexico, Guatemala and Venezuela and J sp. in
Florida), Old World (I sp. in Somalia and 4 spp. in Socotra)
Named after the American botanist Alvan Wentwonh Chapman (1809-1 899),
who cont ributed much to the knowledge of botany in Florida
Perennial hcrm, small shrubs o r trees; seasona ll y dry tropical to subtropical
woodland. bushland, grassland and open scmbland, often in rocky or sandy areas
and on roac.lslclcs
Reference(s): Gi llett (1966); Gu nn el al. (1980); Norman & Gunn (1985); Thulin
0993, 1999)
Rudd 0981) placed Chapmannia, Pach•'CtHt, and Arthroca1pwn in tribe
Aeschynomeneae, s ubtribe Stylosanthinae; l.:lvin et al. (2001a), based on DNA
sequence data, rcsolv~'(] Chapmannia sens. lat. in the Pterocaopus clacle, and
Chapma11nla is odclitlona lly sister to Arachis (Lavin el al., 2000; 2001a) (Fig. 40)
Used as an ornamenta l and for fodder in Somalia
Aracbis L. 1753 -, .. .
-
---- Dalbergia LJ. 1782
. Q ti . ·. . . . ~ · '"~
~ ., - -.
.
69 ~pp.; S AmeriC'".1,from SC & E Brazil (most species) west ro Bolivia ~nd south to ·' ' . I " 1!111eri11111011 P.Browne 0756); Ecastap/Jy/111111 P.l3rmvne (1756); Hecastopbyl/111n
PnrnAu:1y, Ur\lguray ;1.11<! N & E Argentina; but Cll ltiv::tted rxmtropic;Jll)' ancl in Kunth (1824); TriojJlo/emea Ma1t, ex Benth (1837)
. . I
wurrn tempemtc :in:n c, 250 spp.; pantmpical, cent red in the Old World with 60 - 70 species in Africa (1
Prom a- (Gk.: w ithout) a nd rbachis (Gk,: central ~1.xis), 1eferri ng to the absence of
.· 42 aie ende mi c; about 80 species in Asia w i1h 33 species in India (19 endemic.:),
· ~'
Herbs; ~e;isonal\y dry t ropical to subtropical , ciry ~ind well-c.lrainecl wooclecl 44 in Jndo-China, ancl eight in New Gu inea. Two of the Asia11 species (D .
gr<1 land and grassland
Rcforence(s), I3mko 1t (1?39:1); lludcl 198]'>: Kmpovl~kas,. Grt!l(Ory 099· I
-i' ' : • . ; .•·. ! ,f· ·. t' ca11den a le11sis (Dennst.) Prain and D denser Benth.) 1each Australia; c . 60-70
spp . occ ur in the neotropics with 45 -50 spp. in S America (centred in Amazonia)
~
Rudd 0981) placed Ami;h•.< ln iribe AC.<;ehynomcncac. sl 1l)lrlh • Stylosanihlnac. I ..•
and c. 15 - 20 spp in tropical Mexico to C Ame rica and the Caribbean
l.:1vln e/ al. (200 1"), b">ed on ONA S<lqucncc dnrn, rcsol•«:d An11; /Jf.< In 111<· Named after the Swedish bmthers Nils E. Oolberg 0736-1819) and Carl Gustav
l'oeroc:irpu.• cln<ic ns sislcr 10 Stylou1111/JN (rig. O)
Am~/Jl< IJJ'fJ08a(!{1 L (peonut, groumlnuO l " mnfc•r huin.111 food und :«>llr<" of
. .I . . . •J. 4
'
Oa lberg (// 1753-1775), both botanists and friends of Linnaeus
\ '
~'·~
, . Shru bs, trees <incl climbing li;rna.'), some species va1y in habit from scanclent
· . t ~ / ., ,\
.
''~'!!Cl•blc oil (,..C :ond only I<> soyb.!on in lmpounnre •mong legum ·s), uncl "ni111:ll ·,. . sh ru bs in dry hab itats to rnbust lia nas in humid a!'eas; tropic..:al l'ai n forest to
fodder (m;iinly lt';l.vcs): •lso use I "". Mlil rcnlll-;cr .ind ground CQ\'Cr: oth~"< seasonally dry tropical to subt1opical humid :.m d clry forest, woodla nd, bushland,
•p<..oci"" "'" '.1..""d slmll.1rly, but on n inore ICJC.1tl or rcglon:ol b.1S1sC•.g•. A.plmol thicket ;111cl wooded grassland
Kmpov. & W. . n:g.). l'unhcr USC!! nre ns medicine nnd focls; •he oil i> Uo: f).1.<C Reference(s), Prain 0901), Hepre1 in Hutchi ns on & Dalziel (1953, 513 - 516);
of numerous lnduStrlnl products (e.g.. polishes, paino.s, Jubrk~'""'· inscctlridl'S, Polhill in Mil ne-lledhcacl & Po lhill 0971' 95 - 112); Tliothat hli 0987); 1lo.'5e1 &
so:ips :ind t'O.~n1<;1ks) , ~· ,/ •
',., ~
!
' )
ltabevo hitra 0996); Carvalho 0997); Aymarcl in lleny el al. (1999, 295 - 301);
' . . ~· Bo.'5el" & R"bevohitra in Ou Puy e/ al (2002, 321 - 361); Niyonclham (2002); Lock
' · ~· ,
~ ~·t; '(. .~ ~
1 sp.; NE Brazi l (endemic to the state of Espirito Santo; rnre) sections based on anclroccium and rruit typ e; Ca rvalho 0997) treated the Bn1zi lian
Named after the Bra:t.ilian botanist Dr. Giazicl::t Maciel Barroso (1912-2003) . " Ii . .d . species in ftve sections based on inf101 esce nce and fruit types . The combined
Tall trees; tl'Opic~I Atlantic rain forest ana lyses of Lavin el al (200la) place Dalbergia in the Dalbergia clacle siste1 to
Reference(s), Lima Cl983b) Nlacbaerium and Aescby110111e11e subgen . Ochupodi11111 (Pig. 40)
Lwin et al. (200la) resolved Grazielodendron in the Pterocarplis cladc (fig . c}O) 1\fany fndian, Africm, ancl B1azilian species of" Dalbergia, including D. nigra
(Ye ll ) AJ\cmao ex I3enth -, D sissoo Roxb-, D. /atifolic1 Roxb. and D. 111e/ano;..:y/on
. ,: ~ · c$·
Guill. & Perr. a re known to produce high qua lit y timbei ' [h;1t is used for
construction, fine fl11niture, cabinet wo1k, marquetiy and inl;:1y, ri<inos ;md other
musical instruments , tool and cutle1y handle.s, turneiy, carYi ng and vario us
.specirtlty items. Common names include rosewoocl, blackwoocJ, tu li pwoocl,
kingwoo<l, ebonywood (not true ebony), cocobo lu, nambar, palis:.rndro and sisam.
The tenn rosewood most p robably refers to the pleasa nt smell of tbe wood. Sinc.:e
.· ~
the woo<l burns well, i[ is also often the preferred wood for cooking and
charcoal-making (e.g ., D _sissoo in Asi:.1) Sevc1'i.1 I srecies are cultivated in the Old
\Vorld tropics as multipurpose trees for timber, fibre, fodder, fuelwoocl ;:111d
medicine, or as ornamentals; contact c.leimatitis is reported from the wood
326 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
TRIBE DALBERGIEAE 327
Aeschynomene mediacris Drawing by V. C. Gordon
Aeschynamene martii Photograph by G. P. lewis
Machaerium hirtum Photograph by G. P. lewis
SmitbiaAiton 1789
Damapana Adans. (1763)
c. 20 spp.; Old World, mainly native to the Indian subcontinent (c. 11 spp.
endemic); a further 6 spp. widespread in Asia, cwo of which, S sensitiva Aiton
and S, conferta Sm. extend into N Australia; 2 spp. endemic in Africa and of the
two Malagasy species, one (S elliotii Baker f) also occurs in Africa and the other
(S. sensitiva) in SE Asia
'~med :ifter Sir James Sf11ith (1729 - 1828), round;,r o 1he Linne:i n Society in l.<>ndon
Herbs 10 subshn1bs: ~sonolly dry 1ropic:il gnc.<Sl:rnd, marshy ureas nnd sue 1111; ides
tlei'ftlnce(s): Vcrdcoun 097Ckt. 197 10, 1974, 1979, 2000: 138- 1 O); ll11dd (1!)111);
Thuan et al. (1987); Du Puy & Labat in Du Puy et al. (2002: 655 -657)
Genus in need of revision; related to Ko1schya with which it shares helicoid
cymose inflorescences. Rudd (1981) placed Smitbia in tribe Aeschynomeneae,
subtribe Aeschynomeninae. Lavin et al. (2001a), based on DNA sequence data,
resolved Smithia in the Dalbergia clade with Aeschynomene sect. Aeschynomette
(Fig. 40); both these taxa and Geissaspis share medifixed stipules
Used for forage, human food, medicine and as soap substitutes
Smithia elliotil Drawing by E. M. Stones l<otschya perrierl Photograph by D. Du Puy
Polhill Cl98lp: 398) placed Hypocalyptus in tribe Hypocalypteae now appear to be basally branc.htn
Liparieae, but analyses of numerous morphological, to the clad~ co~prising Indigofereae and the millettioi~
cytological and chemical characters (summarised in - phaseolo1d tnbes as well as the Hologalegina crfbes
Schutte & Van Wyk, 1998b), show that Hypocalyptus Within this basally branching group , Hypoce1/yptu ·
does not fit comfortably into any of the existing tribes seems most closely allied to the Mirbelieae a n~
so a new monospecific tribe was described to Bossiaeeae (Crisp et al., 2000) and the Baphioid clade
accommodate the genus. All subsequent studies based of Sophoreae (Pennington et al., 2001; Kajita et al
on gene sequence data have supported its isolated 2001). Wojciechowski et. al. (2004) find mod e rat~
position and uncertain tribal affinities. Hypocalyptus support for Hypocalypteae as sister to the Nli rbeli~e
was misplaced in the genistoid tribes, differing from and Bossiaeeae. The crown clade age e>f
them in the chromosome number, seed aril shape, Hypocalypteae -Mirbelieae (representing the age of the
micropyle type and position, ephemeral antipodal trans-continental split in this South Africa-Au ·tra lian
cells, presence of canavanine, absence of alkaloids diversification) is estimated to be c. 55 Mya (Lavin et
(both quinolizidine and piperidyl alkaloids) and al., in press), remarkably old in legume terms (Schrire
different flower pigments (absence of esters of et al., pages 21-54, this volume) and unique in age for
anthocyanins and presence of methylated southern Hemisphere trans-continental dlsjun rioos.
anthocyanins) [see Schutte & Van Wyk Cl998b) and The Hypocalypteae includes one genus and tluee
references cited therein]. species (Fig. 41).
Hypocolyptus sophoroides Photograph by B. -E. Van Wyk Hypocalyptus sophoroides Photograph by B. -E. Van Wyk
Miltettioids
Phaseoloids
Hologalegina
FIG. 41 Diagram of relationships of tribe Hypocalypteae after Crisp eta/. (2000); Kajita eta/. (2001); Wojciechowski eta/. (2004)
11YPoca/yptus oxalidifolius Photograph by 8.-E. Van Wyk
·be Mirbe licae (Benth.) Polhill & Crisp 1982; Mirbelieae (Be nth.) Polhill 1981, no m. inval.
Tfl Tribe Pod:i lyrieae subtribe Mirbe liinae Be nth. (1837) , as 'Mirbelieae'
Thi treaunem r ecognises 25 gene ra and (6 6)-(688) al., 2000; Crisp & Cook, 2003a) has found the
- (689) pe ies in the e nd mic Australasian ( ustralia Bossiaeeae to be monophyletic but part of a polytomy
'fll mania and Papua ew uin a) trlbe Mirbelieae with the major clades of Mirbeliea e . It is unclear
whether the giant antipodals group (including
(Fig. 2 . It comprises tw group , one w ith g ne ra
ha ing -nu l ate e mbryo-sacs and g iant a ntipo da l Bossiaeeae) is the monophyletic sister group of the 5-
'.Ind the other with 21 g ne ra having usually multipl , nucleate group, or paraphyletic and containing the
5-nuclea~ embryo sacs and no antipodals. Most p i
5-nucleate group (Crisp et al., 2000; Crisp & Cook,
ill thi Lril e are ricoid brub with y LI w and .red 2003a). However, the 5-nucleate group is supported by
('egg and ba o n' flo wers. They are c nspic uo u , both morphological and molecular data . Support for
01 ti me domina nt , unde r t re y m e mbe r o f the clade containing both Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae is
50 w eak or non-existent, and it would be premature to
sclero1 hyU nununitie (heathla nd a nd u caly pt-
dominated woodland and fore. t , m stly n po r o il recircumscribe these tribes . Analyses of ITS , rbcL and
of the south-west, south and east coast of Australia. matK sequence d ata indicate that Mirbelieae and
Polhill's (1994) classification of Mirbelieae was Bossiaeeae are most closely related to the small South
based on a cladistic analysis using morphology (Crisp African tribe Hypocalypteae, and then to the Old World
& Weston, 1987), which found the tribe to b e the tropical tribes (including Indigofereae and the
monophyl e tic sister group of Bossiaee ae . A millettioid and phaseoloid tribes) and Hologalegina,
reworking of the morphology (Crisp & Weston, 1995) la rgely comprising the temperate herbace ous
with th e addition of embryological data from papilionoids (Crisp et al., 2000; Doyle et al., 2000;
Cameron & Prakash (1994), found two groups within Kajita et al., 2001; Wojciechowski et al., 2004).
Mirbelieae, one being a large clade in which the The clade with 5-nucleate embryo-sacs comprises
embryo-s a cs are re duced to five nuclei, with two strongly supported sister taxa: Isotropis and the
ephemeral antipodals. The second group was Mirbelia group (Crisp & Cook, 2003a & b).
paraphyletic, containing the above group and genera Circumscription of the c. 19 genera within the Mirbelia
in which the embryo-sacs are normal Polygonum- group has never been stable and it has been proposed
type, but with giant antipodals. This latter embryo-sac to subsume all into an expanded concept of Pultenaea
type is shared with Bossiaeeae. (Fig. 42; Crisp & Cook, 2003b; Orthia et al., 2005, in
Phylogenetic analysis of DNA seque nces (Crisp et press a).
Bossiaeeae MIRBELIEAE
(see page 355)
I .I I
II
FIG. 42 Diagram of relationships in tribe Mirbelieae after Crisp et al. (2000); Crisp & Cook (2003a)
Euchilopsis linearis Photograph by M. o. Crisp Otion microphyllum (unpublished name) Photograph by M. o. Crisp
Gastrolobium (continued)
Refe re nce(s} Elliot & Jo nes (1 986, 4: 336 - 349); Ci isp & Westo n 0987: 83 -11 7);
Cris p in Eggleto n & Vane-Wright 0994: 28 1- 309); Crisp & Westo n 0995:
262 - 263, 282); Crisp 0995a); Chand ler el al, (2001 , 2002)
Although there is !;trong molecula1· support for this genus ~is a cl ade i nclud ing
Brachysema, ja nsonia and Nemcia , no 11101phologic:.i l syn apomorphy is known;
diagnosed wi thin th e Pultenaea sens. lat (5-nuclea te e mbiyo-sac) group by a
combination of ru gose-lobed arils, opp os ite or who rl ed phyllotaxis, abse nce of
b1acteoles and lo ng sle nde r stipu les
Ma 11y species produce flu oro-acetate, w hich is highly to xic to many vcnehr ~Hes,
including domestic gra zing animals (widely known as po ison o r p oison bushes);
all species formerl y included i n Bracbysema andjunson.ia, ri nd sevcial o f those
from Nemcia , have large fl ow ers modified in shape and colo ur for bi1·tl
pollination; this gro up appea rs to b e rn onophyletic and nes ted deeply w ithin
Gaslrolobium ; on ly a single species (G gra ndiflonwi F.Muell.) is both wxic and
bird-po llin" ted, but it is not included in the bird- pollinated clade
Used as o rnamentals, esp ecia lly bird-pollinated spec ies; those fonneily included
in Bracbysema <mdjanson/a have an :attracti ve lo w-growing grow th hahic :ind
conspicuous flowers; used for ground cover
Gostrolobium brocteolosum Photograph by 8. Fuhrer Dav/esio incrossoto Photograph by 8. Fuhrer Gompholobium copitotum Photograph by A. s. George
}.S createc.I here Bossiaeea compri e 6 n ra and c. According to morphological evidence, the
species (Fjg_ 43 , distributed tbrouP-hout Au tralia Bossia eeae is the monophyletic sister group o f
72 Mirbelieae (Crisp & Weston, 1987). Phylogenetic
i;:lllt mo. t f the diversity is in the outh-west and south-
ea r. Most sp cie are hrubs with yell w and r d 'egg analyses based on DNA sequences, however, are more
llncl bacon') flow 1·.Th y are con pi uou , ometime equivocal. A monophyletic Australian radiati on
deit1inanc und r c r y m m er, f s J rophyll including both tribes is indicated by nuclear and
coinmuniti.es (he thland and euca l ypt-dominat d chloroplast DNA, but support for this clade is weak
woodland and foresr), on po rs ils of rh s uth-v est (Crisp et al., 2000 ; Crisp & Cook, 2003a ;
south and east coast of Australia. Wojciechowski et al., 2004). Whilst Bossiaeeae is
Polhill (1994) placed Bossiaeeae between clearly monophyletic, its relationship with the genera
Brongniartieae and Mirbelieae, largely because he of Mirbelieae is unresolved and it would be premature
considered the Templetonia group a link between to redefin e these tribes (Crisp & Cook, 2003a).
Bossiaeeae (where he placed this group) and Bossiaeeae share embryo-sacs having giant antipodals
Brongniaitieae (see also Polhill, 1981m & n). Previously, with Mirbelieae genera Daviesia, Gompholobium,
Crisp & Weston 0987) bad transferred the Templetonia Viminaria, Erichsenia and Sphaerolobium (Cameron
group to Brongniartieae, based on a cladistic analysis & Prakash, 1990), but this embryo-sac group is rarely
using morphology. Recent phylogenetic analyses, monophyletic in DNA analyses (Crisp et al., 2000;
especially those using DNA sequences (Crisp et al., Crisp & Cook, 2003a). Internal relationships of
2000; Doyle et al., 2000; Hu, 2000; Hu et al., 2000; Bossiaeeae are well resolved by DNA, with Goodia
Pennington et al., 2000a, 2001; Wojciechowski et al., sister to the rest, and a clade of Muelleranthus,
2004), support a placement of Brongniartieae either Aenictophyton and Ptychosema sister to Bossiaea and
next to, or within, the Genistoid clade. These same Platylobium (Fig. 43; Crisp & Cook, 2003 a) .
studies indicate that Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae are Platylobium is nested within Bossiaea and these
related , not to the genistoids, but to Hypocalypteae, genera will probably be combined (Crisp et al. ,
lndigofereae, Millettieae and Phaseoleae, and the large unpublished).
!Iologalegina group of tribes.
Mirbelieae
(see page 339)
Goodia
Bossiaea
co
0
Platylobium Vl
l/l
)>
rn
Muelleranthus rn
)>
rn
Ptychosema
Aen ictophyton
FIG. 43 Diagram of relationships in tribe Bossiaeeae after Crisp et al. (2000); Crisp et al. (unpublished)
Bossioeo prlessll Photograph 8. Fuhrer Pfaty/obium obtusongulum (A- E), P. trlongulore (F- J)
Drawing by A. M. Podwyszynski
Aenictophyton reconditum Drawing by A. T. Lee & R. M. Polhill P/aty/abium formosum Photograph by M. Fagg
p (hill (198lf) recognised 4 genera and c. 710 species group of tribes (including Millettieae, Abreae,
~oindigofereae. This treatment following Polhill (1994), Phaseoleae, Desmodieae and Psoraleeae). This entire
chrire (1995) , Barker et al. (2000) and Schrire et al. clade is sister to Hologalegina (comprising the
cio03) recognises 7 genera and c. 768 species in the robinioids and the Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade
tribe (Fig. 44). The Indigofereae are predominantly (IRLC)). Basally branching to these two clades are the
}ifrican-Madagascan in distribution, occurring in South African Hypocalypteae and Australian tribes
easooally dry vegetation types of the tropics and Mirbelieae and Bossiaeeae.
subuopi s. The genus Indigo/era (third largest in the The Indigofereae (Barker et al., 2000; Schrire et al.,
i.egumino a ) is pantropical in distribution. 2003) comprises a Cyamopsis, Indigastrum, Microcbaris
Recent morphological-molecular analyses and Rhynchotropis (CRIM) clade which is sister to the
(Pennington et al., 2000a ; Crisp et al., 2000; Indigo/era - Vaughania clade. The Madagascan
\'\lojci d 1owski et al., 2000, 2004; Hu, 2000; Kajita et al., Phylloxylon is putatively the most basally branching
2001; Hu et al., 2002 and Wojciechowski, 2003) place genus in the tribe, although in some analyses in Schrire
Indigof reae at the base of a combined millettioid et al. (2003), Phylloxylon is sister to the CRIM clade.
Phylloxylon
r= Rhynch0tropis
z
J L Microcharis 0
G)
II ,,0
lndigastrum rn
;:o
rn
)>
rn
; Cyamopsis
Vaughania
lncligofera
Hologalegina
FIG. 44 Diagram of relationships in tribe lndigofereae after Barker et al. (2000); Schrlre et al. (2003)
Indigofera L. 1753
A11// Miii. (1754); Sph11e1trliopbon1111 Oesv. (1813); Bremontlera DC. (1825);
Acm11ho11otus Benth. 0 849): A11//a Ludw ex Kuntze Cl891)
c. 700 spp.; Africa-Madagascar Cc. 490 spp.); Asia lo Pacific Cc. 115 spp.);
Australasia Cc. 30 - 40 spp.); c. 13 spp. widespread in the Palaeotropics; c. 6 spp.
pantropical; New World c. 45 spp. USA to Argentina Cc. 30 spp. in N < C Americ:i,
c. 1S spp. in S America)
From ind go !Uld -fer (L.: bearing), referring to species of this genus being the
sou rce of the <lye indigo
Herbs, shrubs or small trees; seasonally dry tropicnl to warm temperate forest,
woodland, wooded grassland and grassland, ,;dorophyllous shrubland, forest
margins and disturbed areas
IMcn:n !( ) : Gillett (19511): Sa n~1 pp3 (1995): Oc Ko n & 111ijssc 0 981): rolhill
( 1990). Lievens (l!)<JZ); S.:hri rc ( 1995): Schrirc in Gol<lbbtt & M11nnin!{ (2000:
86 - 492); l)u f'uy & l.nbut In Ou ruy (JI a l. (2002: 476 - 509 : Schrirc t •J a/. (:!O(m
A gCm L• of c. 25 sectio ns In Afrk :i •M:iclagnscnr wh<.'re h ul l/Jflfum s most
d lvcr,;c, incre:1Sing to c. 30 sca ion.s worldwitlc:, nil spcclc belong to one of
four wcll-suppont'<l and bioi:eogrnphfcally dbtlnt1h•c lade~ In th • analyses of
Schrire et al. C2003)
Used as dyes (imponanl species are I. arrecta Hochst. ex A. Rich , I. articulata
Gouan, I. suffrulicosa Mill. and / . tinctorla L.), medicine, fodder, cover crops,
green manure, human food, erosion control and ornamentals; some species are
toxic to livestock, others have insecticidal qualities
Relation hips among genera of Millettieae have been clade (see page 393). Circumscription of a revised tribe
notori usly difficult to unravel based on traditional Millettieae is not possible at present until genera are
rphologi ·al evidence and this is exemplified by the more comprehensively sampled; however, a Millettioid
1110 sens. strict. group might be expected to include some
:iJphabeli al arrangement of genera in the tribal
treau11enl of Geesink (1981; 1984) and Polhill (1994) . genera in the basal millettioid and phaseoloid group,
Geesink (1981) recognised 44 genera and c . 870 Phaseoleae subtribes Diocleinae, Ophrestiinae and in
species in tribe Millettieae (as 'Tephrosieae') while 43 small part the Erythrininae, tribe Abreae and the core-
genera were accounted for in Geesink (1984) and Millettieae (Fig. 45). The basal millettioid and phaseoloid
Polhill (1994). The genera recognised, however, varied group comprises 17 genera (94 species) that may belong
considerably with only 33 genera in common to both either in the Millettioids sens. strict. or Phaseoleae sens.
treatments of Geesink, while the list of Polhill 0994) lat., or to a clade sister to both these groups (e.g., Kajita
combined elements of Geesink (1981, 1984) with new et al., 2001). The core-Millettieae clade comprises c. 22
data accumulated since then. Tephrosia has traditionally genera and c. 777 spp., with some additional generic
comprised some 400 species but this is re-estimated at segregates being necessary within the 'canavanine
c. 350 species here. group' (Evans et al., 1985), to accommodate species of
The traditional circumscription of the predominantly Millettia sens. lat. and Fordia sens. lat., which on the
pantropical and subtropical tribe Millettieae is followed basis of molecular and chemical evidence are excluded
here (Fig. 45), with 45 genera and (904)-909-(914) from Millettia and Fordia sens. strict.
species being recognised, (i.e. excluding the two genera Relationships between the major groups of genera
and 11 species transferred to Brongniartieae, see Table centred on Lonchocarpus, Derris, Millettia and
8), although the concept of what comprises Millettieae Tephrosia remain obscure, and still reflect a
sens. strict. is changing rapidly based on evidence from geographical bias in segregating them, i.e. distributions
molecular phylogenies. Sequence data for millettioid are limited largely to the New World in the
genera comes from the plastid rhcL gene (Doyle et al., Lonchocarpus group, and the Old World in the other
1997; 2000; Kajita et al., 2001; Hu & Chang, 2003), groups. The suggestion that the Andean South
phytochrome nucleotide genes (Lavin et al., 1998), the American genus Apurimacia might be sister to the
plastid trnK-matK region (Hu et al., 2000) and the largely Old World Tephrosia rather than to
nuclear ITS region (Hu, 2000; Hu et al., 2002). Molecular Lonchocarpus (e.g., Kajita et al., 2001) is possibly
data, together with reinterpreted evidence based on indicative of other Old World-New World sister groups
chemistry (Evans et al., 1985) and wood anatomy yet to be found. Further molecular evidence will
(Gasson et al., 2004), have been the basis for recognising probably result in an overall reduction in the number
a number of informal suprageneric groupings and for of genera recognised, particularly in the Tephrosia and
transferring Cyclolobium and Poecilanthe to tribe Lonchocarpus groups where various small or
Brongniartieae (Table 8; Fig. 45). monotypic 'one-organ' genera may be better placed
The most far-reaching result of the above molecular within larger genera. Ptycholohium, Requienia and
analyses was that a substantial part of the traditionally Paratephrosia, for example, are difficult to distinguish
circumscribed tribe Phaseoleae is more closely allied to from Tephrosia, but for the emphasis traditionally
the core-Millettieae than to the Phaseoleae sens. lat. placed on their atypical pods.
---
Paratephrosia
A Millettloid groups 23 c.131 Requienia
CL Ptycholobium
1) Transferred to tribe Cyclolobium Tropical S America ::::l
Brongniartieae (page 253) Poecilanthe ,_
0
l9 Millettia sens. strict.
2) IRLC 'millettioid group' c. 6 c. 37 Tropical & temperate Asia; Cal/erya also in Aust~ Q)
Wisteria also in N America a, UJ c Pongamiopsis
<( c
UJ re
3) Basal millettioid and 17 c. 94 Mc;>stly tropical Africa, Madagascar and SE Asia· · I- >
re Derris
phaseoloid group Atistrosteenls(a in Australia; Platycyamus in tro'pical I- c
South America UJ re Paraderris
_J
_J
y
c
0
B Core-Millettieae 22 c. 777
:2: z Dahlstedtia
UJ
~ ?Deguelia
5) Canavanine group c. 1 (plus generic c. 12 + Tropical Africa-Madagascar for Philenoptera 0 Lonchocarpus
segregates ex Millettia u Behaimia
and Fordia)
I I
Bergeronia
6) Non-canavanine group ( Margaritolobium
I Muellera Hesperothamnus
a) Piscidia group 2 c. 12 Mexico, CAmerica and Caribbean with one species to Piscidia Millettioid
I western S America
sens. strict.
b) Lonchocarpus group group
7 c. 144 Tropics and subtropics of the New World Philenoptera
Millettia pro parte
c) Derris group 2 I c. 70 SE Asia with few species to Africa & Australia Fordia pro parte
(? = lmbralyx)
d) Millettia group c.2 s 153 Tropical Africa, Madagascar & SE Asia but some taxa will
be transferred elsewhere, e.g. to the 'canavanine group'
or basal millettioid and phaseoloid group Phaseoleae
I
(subtribes Diocleinae
e) Tephrosia group 8 c. 386 Mostly tropical Africa and Madagascar; Tephrosia to & Ophrestiinae)
Asia, Australia and tropical C & N America; Paratephrosia (see page 394)
in Australia; Apurimacia in Andean S America Abreae (see page 389)
Austrosteenisia
?Leptoderris
Dalbergiella
Agan ope
Ostryocarpus
Xeroderris
Fordia
Dewevrea Basal millettioid &
?Platysepalum phaseoloid group
?Sylvichadsia
Schefflerodendron
Craibia
?Disynstemon
Platycyamus
Kunstleria
Burkilliodendron
Craspedolobium
Callerya
?Antheroporum
Endosamara IRLC
Sarcodum 'millettioid group'
Afgekia
Wisteria
Poecilanthe Brongniartieae
Cyclolobium (see page 253)
FIG. 45 Diagram of relationships between informal groups within the traditional circumscription of tribe Mlllettieae after Evans et al. (1985); Lavin et
a/, (1998); Hu (2000); Hu et al. (2000); Kajita et al. (2001); Hu et ol. (2002); Hu & Chang (2003)
Wisteria Nu tt 1s1s
Dalbergiella Baker f. 1928
3 spr.; 2 spp. in WC Africa (Gu ineo-Congolian region); 1 sp. in SE Zambezian
Kraubnia Steud. (1840); Rebsonitt Srritch (1984)
reg ion
c. 5- 6 spp.; c. 4 spp. i n China and E Asia (Ko1ea and japan), 1- 2 spr in rrom el/us- CL, diminutive fo rm) of Dalbergla. to which it w;is thought to be
ternpern te N America
closely related
Traditionally named after D1 Casrar Wistar 0760 -18 18), rhil an throrisr and active Trees 0 1 sca ndent shnibs; tropical ra in fo rest and seasona lly dry forest (often
prornotor of science at the Unive1si ty of Pennsylvania; rhe ort hographic v:uiant 1iverine), woodland and bushland, often associated wirh rocky outcrops
\Visteria is conserved over rhe spelli ng \'(lisfaria. Anoth e1 exp l~mati on is that the Refe1ence(s} Polhill in Milne-Redhead & Polhi ll (1971, 93 - 95), Lock (1939,
name commemorates Charles Jones WiSler Sr 0782-1865), a dose f1iend of 350 - 351); Lock in Brummiu el al (submiued)
Thomas Nutrnll, the author of the generic name Placed by Hu el al (2000) among a basa l millett ioicl and phaseoloid grour o f
Li ann.s or eiecr shru bs; wmm temperate forest to shrublancl on 1ocky hillsides, and
genera
along 1i ve rbanks
Used as timber, medici ne, ornamentals
Reference(s), Valder (1995)
T his genus is now placed away frorn the core-Milleuieac in the In veitcd Repeat
Lacking Clade (JRLC) in the Hologa legina alliance (Hu er al., 2000)
Used as ornamentCJls (with 1rnmy cu ltivars), bark fibres for· textiles, essen tial oi ls
Aganope Miq . 1s55
Os/l yodeiris Dunn (19 11)
and fragrances
c. 7 spp.; WC Africa (4-5 spp .); Asia CS China , Indian subcontinent, Indo-China,
Malesia and Papuasia, 2 spr.)
Possibly from agcmo- (Gk , mild, pleas,.nt) and -opis (Gk ' appearance), 1efcn-ing
Austrosteenisia R.Geesink 1984
to the pleasant appearance of the plants
4 spp.; E coasLof Aust1alia (also reco1ded from Papua New Gu inea as Verris sp. C Lianas or scandent shrubs to sma ll trees; tropical ra in forest, mangrove or th icket
by Ve1dcour1 1979, 329) Ileference(s} Polhill (1971); Phan Ke Loe & Vidal (2001)
Named after Prof. C,G G.j. van Steen is who stimulated Geesink's ent h usi~1s111 for Placed among a basal mi lleuioicl and rhaseo loid group of gener•
Ma lesia n botany, and australis (L.: south, southern) from ils distribution
Used as ff1edicine
Lianas; tropical ra in forest, seasonally dry forest and vine lhickets, to subtropical
woodland :rnd scrub, including distu1 be<l areas
Reference(s} Dixon 0997) Ostryocarpus Hook.f 1849
Hu el al (2000) places this among a basa l millettioid and phaseoloid g1oup of
1-2 spp.; WC Africa (Guineo-Congolian region)
genera and Kaji ta et al (2001) place it as basally bianching to the Phaseoleae
From osllyo- (Gk ., shell) and cc11pos (Gk.: fruit), refening to the shell-like pods
sens fat clade
Llanas or scandent shrubs; tropical 1ain forest to seasonally dry forest, often
riparian, and mangrove
Reference(s} Dun n (1911)
Leptoderris Dunn 1910
Placed among a basal millettioid and phaseoloid group o f genera
c. 20 spp.; mostly WC Africa (Guineo-Congolian to Lake Victoria regions); 2 spp.
Used as fish poisons and for fish nets ( fib re) and rope
in th e Zambezian and one in the Zanzibar-lnhambane regions
From lepta- (Gk .. : slender, narrow) and derris, referri ng to a distinguishing
combination of narrow pew ls and ca lyces and a frui1 resembling Den·is
Lianas, sometimes shnibs; tropical rain forest ro season:ill)' di")' fo rest, woocl l::incl
and bushland
Reference(s): Dunn (1910); Geesink (1981); Lock 0989, 351-353)
Evans el al. (1985) p1ov ide chemical evidence that Leploderrls may be :1Jnong ;l
basal millettioid and rhaseoloid grou r of genera, a position supported by the
ana lysis o f Kaji ta el al. (2001)
Used as medicine and fish poisons
Leptoderris nobilis Drawing by P. Holliday Ostryocorpus riparius Drawing by P. Halliday
0
~
;~
Pyranthus tutlearensls subsp. tul/earensls Photograph by D. Du Puy lttundu/ea stenaphylla Photograph by D. Du Puy
0
Reference(s): Wood (1949); Brummitt (1968a); Gilleu in Milne-Redhead & Polhill Wheeler et al. 0992) note that this monotypic genus is very close to and perhaps
(1971: 157-21 1); Bosman & De Haas (1983); Tellez (1986); Lock (1989: 367-386l; not really distinct from Tepbrosia; Geesink (1984) placed it in synonymy under
Du Puy & Labat in Du Puy et al, (2002: 395-416); Brummitt in Brummitt et al. Tephrosia, but Paratephrosia is still widely maintained in Australia
(submitted) J
A taxonomically complex genus; Pedley (pers comm) notes that c. 12 species
~
from N Australia, characterised by leaves with reticulate veins, could be Requienia De. 1825 ,
segregated as a separate genus Tepbrosia sect. Requienia (DC) Be11th. (1865)
Used as fish poisons, cover crops, livestock fodder, insecticides, ornamentals and 3 spp.; W to NE Africa (Sahelian zone); southern Africa (S Zambezian and
for medicine, e,g T. virginiana (L.) Pers. (goats rue, devil's shoestring, hoary Kalahari.Highveld regions) ,
pea), T. vogelii HookJ. (fish-poison pea), T.pu.purea (L.) Pers. and T. candida Named after Esprit Requien (1788 - 1851), French botanist at Avignon
(Roxb.) DC. (white tephrosia) Herbs; seasonally dry tropical wooded grassland, shrubland and bushland, on
sand
G Reference(s): Brummitt (1989); Brummitt in Brummitt et al. (subm itted)
Apurimacia Ha1·ms 1923 Further evidence may place this as a lineage within Tephrosia
c. 2 spp.; S America (Andean Peru, Bolivia and Argentina)
Named after the Apurimac region in Andean Peru where the type species occurs
Shrubs; seasonally dry tropical montane shrubland on rocky slopes Ptychol.obiumHarms 1915
Reference(s): Macbride (1943); Burkart 0951); Lavin & Sousa (1995) Sylttra E. Mey. (1836)
In the ana lysis of Kajita et al. (2001), the genus (based on the exemplar species 3 spp.; NE Africa and Arabia (Somalia-Masai region); southern Africa (S
A. micbelii (Rusby) Harms [correct name - A. boltviana (B1itton) Lavin]) is sister Zambezian and Kalahari-Highveld regions)
to the Tephrosia group; the other species, A do/icboca.pa (G riseb.) Burka1t may Fromptycbo- (Gk: folds) and lobion (Gk.: pod), referring to the folded pods
have an affinity elsewhere characteristic of the genus
Used as fish poisons and insecticides Shrubs or herbs; seasonally dry tropical woodland, wooded grassland and
shrubland, on sand
Reference(s): Biummitt ( 1980); Brummitt in Brummitt el al (submitted)
Further evidence may place this as a lineage within Tephrosia
j\breae by B. D. schrire
'fhe tri ba l pla m nt of the i lated genu Abru. maintenance of Abrus as a separate monogeneric
(with 17 pe ie ) ha long b en pr bl roa cic (P lb ill tribe for the present. Improved understanding of
198le: 243- 244). Th most recent mole ular ana ly s relationships is likely to result from greater sampling
of Doyle et al., 2000; Hu, 2000; Hu et al., 2000; Kajita within the millettioid-phaseoloid complex.
eta!., 2001; Wojciechowski, 2003 & Wojciechowski et The Abreae are predominantly Afro-Madagascan in
al., 2004), however, consistently place Abrus near distribution with 3 species endemic to the Horn of NE
the base of the clade comprising the core-Millettieae Africa. The remaining species are Asian and 2 species
and various elements excluded from Phaseoleae sens. are pantropical. New World representatives (from
/at. (Figs. 45-47). This basally branching position Amazonian Brazil and Venezuela) of the pantropical A .
together with the unusual combination of paripinnate melanospermus Hassk. subsp. tenuiflorus (Benth.) D.
le aves, 9 stamens and a chemical profile of Harder [= A. pulchellus Wall. ex Thwaites subsp.
tryptophane-derived alkaloids (abrine and tenuiflorus (Benth.) Verde.]), are possibly distinct from
hypaphorine) and pyridine-based alkaloids Old World material of this subspecies (Verdcourt,
(pre ca torine and trigonellin e), supports the 1970b).
- Abrus ABREAE
-
Phaseoleae subtribe
FIG. 46 Diagram ofrelationships oftrlbeAbreae after Doyle eta/. (2000); Hu (2000); Hu eta/. (2000); Kajita eta/. (2001); Wojciechowski eta/. (2004)
LEFT Abrus precatorius Photograph by G. P. Lewis
with Verclcowt (1970b) and Breteler (1960; 1994a) putting opposing opinions; the 1
classification Of Verdcourt is follmVe<l here ·
The type species A pre'catorius'L is 'corilmonly known as false or Indian
liquorite, crab's-eye, jequirity Or prayer bead; 'the attractive shiny bicolou re<l
seeds (red and blac~) are commonly used in necklaces a'nd ~ostume jewellery,
but are highly 'pdiscin'ous and can be lethal if ingested; other uses are as '
lnediCine f6IJ a wide rahge of condition.-! (medical supe rvis io n essential); for fibre;
green 'manure; 01'n'amCrifol:s; a swc~tcncr for diinks :111d 'he root can bC a ''
substitute for liquorice (althoUgh be-Ware of toxic' propeLties); also has various
cultural 'and spiritual uses
Abrus oureus subsp. aureus Pl10109rnpl1 by D. Du Puy Abrus precatorius Photograph by o. Du Puy
I '11 I I;,''
previous accounts of the Phaseoleae by Baudet 0978) Millettieae, two genera have been transferred from
and Lackey 0981) recognised 90 and 84 genera and c. Desmodieae and eight new genera have been added.
1540 and 1480 species respectively in the tribe. In an Vigna has traditionally been thought to comprise some
equivalent, i.e. traditionally held view of Phaseoleae, 89 150-200 species, but Vigna sens. strict. may contain
genera and 0554)-1 567-(1580 species are treated fewer than 100.
here (Table 9; Fig. 47). Changes between Baudet 0978) Recent molecular analyses of the tribe, however,
and this treatment are that eleven genera are now in have emphasised both the polyphyletic and
synonymy or have subsequently been placed in paraphyletic nature of Phaseoleae as traditionally
TABLE 9 Suprageneric groups, both formal and informal, currently recognised within the traditional concept of tribe Phaseoleae
A Millettioid groups 16 (212)-216-(219) Throughout the tropics and subtropics, to warm temperate (in
(see also page 369) the N Hemisphere)
2) Phaseoleae subtribe Diocleinae 13 c. 194 Mostly Neotropics and subtropics [c. 151 spp.], Palaeotropics
[c. 43 spp. - 2 genera endemic to Malesia & Papuasia]
3) Phaseoleae subtribe Ophrestiinae 3 c.22 Africa and Madagascar [17 spp.], Asia [5 spp.]
B Phaseoleae sens. lat. clade 73 (1342)-1352-(1361) Throughout the tropics and subtropics
5) Phaseoleae subtribe Clitoriinae 5 c. 106 Mostly Neotropics and subtropics [c. 91 spp.]; Palaeotropics
[c. 15 spp.]
I) Phaseoleae·Desmodieae group
6) Basal Phaseoleae sens. lat. c. 9 c. 140 Mainly warm temperate to montane and lowland tropical Asia and
(ex Erythrininae) and Kennedinae Australia (c. 14 spp. of Mucuna in the Neotropics)
ii) Core·Phaseoleae
(Phaseoleae·Psoraleeae group)
8) Basal core-Phaseoleae 8 c. 175 Palaeotropics and subtropics [c. 105 spp.]; Neotropics and
subtropics [70 spp. of Erythrina]
9) Phaseoleae subtribe Cajaninae 10 c. 495 Mostly Palaeotropics to warm temperate Old World [c. 400 spp.],
Neotropics and subtropics [c. 95 spp. in 2 genera]
10) Phaseoleae subtribe Glycininae 20 c. 122 Mostly Old World [c. 96 spp.]; Neotropics and subtropics
[c. 26 spp. principally in 3 genera]
12) Phaseoleae subtribe Phaseolinae 21 c. 314 Mostly Palaeotropics and subtropics [c. 196 spp.]; Neotropics
and subtropics [c. 118 spp., principally in 8 genera]
Core- Millettieae
(see page 369)
A~,iq~. rosh'tl~~th~s. Sh.~teria, ?Mastersia, Dioc/ea sp. aff. grandifloro Photograph by G. P. Lewis Luzania purpurea Drawing by H. E. Ireland
.'
Desmodieae (see page 433)
?Diphyllarium
Dioclea Ku nth 1824
c. 10 spp .; S America (c. 35 + spp . lrnostly Il1azil with a few extencling to the
Caribbean, C Arnerica and Mexico], c. 4-5 spp . also occuning widely in the
Palaeotropics); Asia (c. 3-4 spp.)
Named for the Greek physician Diocles of Carystos (240-180 BC), who lived
shortly after Hippocrates and was famous for • his knowledge of plants
Lianas or shrubs; tropical lowl<md rain forest, 1iverine or sw<1mp fo1est ;:rncl thicket;
seasonally d1y tropie<1l to subtropical woodland, wooded grassland and scrnb
I 'ii l l'. ,i'l t, i ' «'' i I •
Refe1ence(s): Maxwell (1969); JVbxwell & Taylor (2003); Queiroz el al (2003)
Spatholobus, Butea, Meizotropis Maxwell (in cor.-esponclcncc at the Kew I-Ierba1·iurn) considerecl the genus to
comprise some 50 species. A difficult genus because of proble111.s of species
delimitation within Dioclea, and poorly delimited from neighbou1•ing genera,
Ad,~r~d~licn9"1?~.Pa .~l'alv;$ .. so1usafra, e.g. Cra(ylia. A global ieview of the genus is neces.sa1y; the tribe Diocleinac
sJbtribe C:aiah\hae Qarrl~sea~ Ch ~!iPSG!as, RhY.TJehosia, Erlosema, together with Oph1estiinae and the genus Rhodopis (originally in the
E1ythrininae) are placed in a Millettioicl sens. strict . group, somewhat 1emovecl
Dunbaria, Calanll!!, ,ftemi11gia f1orn the Phaseoleae sens. la/ . (Bruneau el al,, 1995, Doyle el al., 2000), Maxwell
& T;1ylor (2003) ancl Queiroz el cil. (2003) find Dioclea to be polyphyletic,
E~~thrl~a. Psophocar~us, Dys~lobium, Dioc/ea sens strict. is mo1e closely allied, among others, to Cymbosema ancJ the
Bionia clade of Camplosema (Queiroz et al, 2003), while the Pachylobium clade
Otoptera, Decorsea
of Dioc/ea is siste1· to a g1'oup of genera that includes these elements
Common d1i ft seeds; used as ornamentals, medicine and insecticides
, i
I
Reference(s): Elmer (1907); Adema 0998); Maxwell & Taylor (2003)
Elmer 0907) excluded L pwpw"ea f1om Dioc/ea or Pueraria and placed it
I I
I
nearest to Canavalia; Luzania is unknown in fruit but flower clissections (Lewis,
pers. comm ., 2001) suggest that Elmer's conclusion was incorrect and that L.
p1t1purea would be better accommodated within Dioc/e{{; see 8lso note under
I Psoraleeae (see page 447) Nfacropsycha11th1-1s
WaJira .Sp~~postvh. N~sphoslyjls, Alistilus,
~_H~rqpol)cJ1R, r De,ll~hlj>S' Ma,cfotyto.ooa, Macropsychanthus Harms 1900
subtribe Phase~Unae @iJ?,ogori, ablf3b, Spathioqe.mi!, Vatovaea,
c. 2 spp.; Papuasia, Micronesia (possibly Philippines)
Phy~asOgm~ ~ Vigna, ,Q"-yr~Yflt1'.l,\s. From macro- (Gk.: large), p~vche- (Gk.: butter·tly) and arilhos (Gk .: tlower) for the
R~~seolus, R~nif ~ella, Strophostyles, . . ch£1racte1istically large papilionoid flowers
bollehopsis, MacroptiOum .. Mysanthus, oryxis Licinas; tropical rain forest, often along rive1s
? =placement uncertain in generic group Reference(s); Verdcourt (1979: 466-470); Adema (1998); Maxwell & Taylm (2003)
One species has 4 varieties (Adema, 1998); Maxwell & Taylor (2003) fincl Luzania
FIG. 47 Diagram of relationships between phaseoloid groups after Kajita et al. (2001); Hu et al. (2002); Wojciechowski et al. (2004) Nlacropsychanthus lauterbachii Drawing by G. Bartusch and 1Hacropsychan1/Jus fo r m a clade embeclclccl within Dioc/ea
Cratyliq, Ma rt ex Benth 1837 Lackeya Fortunato, LP.Q uei1oz & G l'.Lewis 1996
<". 7 ~pp. : Brazil.' Bolivia, Peru, N Argentina l sp.: SE USA
::~:: cm10: (Gk.! s~rong} anil cau(os- (G~.: ste~n), the plants have firm woody Named afte1•James A Lackey, a specialist on the family Leguminosae who has
published wid ely on the tribe Phaseoleae <tnd added much 10 our know ledge of
tian~ or <!1ct1 to .c1ndcm •hrul : N:~snn.1lly <lo; • 10 wet tropica l forest and forest the group
r1111rg1n,, woodland, thorn thicket, scrub ~n<l woo<it.·d w:is>lnnd Climbing herbs; warm temperate to subtropical ri verine wood land, wood land
llclimm ,( ): Qwiro~ ( 1991); Q11droi <!I al. 2003) ma rgin!'i a nd grassland
:c not • und.,r D/oclen 1111d Cm11fl/<).w11w for relationships Hcference(s): Fortunato el al. (1996); Quei roz el al (2003)
See nme un<ler G'alaclfa for relationships
Centrosema plumier/ Photograph by G. P. Lewis Clitorlopsis mollis Drawing by P. Halliday Apios tuberoso Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Shuteria sinensis Drawing by M. Smith Mastersia baker/ (a-e), M. assamica (f, g) Drawing by C. van Laeren & Mucuna gigantea Photograph by G. K. Linney Mucuna macrocarpa Photograph by/. Murata
/. Wessendorp
MucunaAdans. 1763
Shuteria Wight & Arn 1834 Stizolobium P.Browne (1756)
4-5 spp.; Asia (Indian subco ntinent, Inda-China, S China, Males ia, Papuasia) c, 105 spp.; pantropical (c . 80 spp. in Asia wd China, 1-2 spp. in Australia; c. 12
Named after James Shuter (' -1827), who collected many plants in the vicinity of spp» in Africa, Madagascar and Mascarenes; c. 12-13 spp. in the Neotropics,
Mad1as centred in C America & the Calibbean)
Climbing he1 bs or· lianas; seasonally dry tropical and subt1opical forest margins, Derived from the Brazilian Indicrn name 'Mucuna· given to these plan ts
seconda1y forest, woodland or scnib, ofceO in open places and on limestone Mostly lianas; tropical wet lowland co rnontane, often coastal rain forest, co
Reference(s): Thuan (1972); Qian (2003) seasonally dry forest, woodland and thicket
Sbuteria, usually placed in the Glycininae (Lackey, 1981) has in recent Reference(s): Wilmot-Dear (1984 , 1987, 1990, 1991, 1992); Verdcmut in Mackinder
phylogenies (B1 uneau et al, 1995; Doyle et al, 2000) grouped with a et al. (2001: 14-24); Du Puy & Labat in Du Puy et al, (2002: 524-529)
Kennediinae-Desmodieae clade togethe1 with ce ttain genera in the Erythrininae Stizo/obium is sometimes maintained as a separate genus but is retained under
Used as g1een manure and cover crops in plantations Mucuna here pending full revision; molecular evidence (Doyle et al., 2000) places
Mucuna sister to tribe Desmodieae
Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. (velvet, Bengal or Mauritius bean), is widely gro\.·vn for
Mastersia Benth. 1865 forage and as a cover crop <1nd green manui-e; the hairs on many species (often
2 spp.; SE Asia (1 sp. NE Indian subcontine nt, IndC>-China [Myanmar], W China known as buffalo bean) are an intense irri tant; some species are ornamentals
[Xizang]); 1 sp. Males ia)
Named for Maxwell T. Masters (1833- 1907), British physician and botanist
Lianas or twining herbs; seasonally d1)' t1opical forest often in open pl<1ces, f1orn
wet to dry sites
Refe rence(s): Wel ze n & Hengst (1984)
Currenrl y pf aced in subclibe Glycininae (Bruneau et al., 1995) but see comments
under Diphyllaiium
Kennedia nigricans Photograph by 8. Fuhrer Vandasina retusa Drawing by R. Natadipoero Spatholobus /atistipulus Drawing by J. Wessendorp
Parocalyx scariosus Drawing by P. Halliday Chrysosc/as porvifloro (1-10) and Chrysocias pauc/flora (11, 12)
DrolVing by P. Holl/day
Dysolobium grande Drawing by c. M. Grey-Wilson Oecorseo grondidieri Ph otograph by D. Du Puy Strongylodon modogascariensis Photograph by D. Du Puy
Neocollettia gracilis Drawing by M. Smith Wajiro albescens Drawing by P. Halliday Nesphostylis holosericea Drawing by o. Erasmus Alistilus jumellei Photograph by o. Ou Puy
--
Named fo1 the plant collector Colonel Sir Herny Collett (1836-1902)
Anagram of Sphenostylis (q.v.), from which the genus was segregated
Herb (creeping); seasonally diy tropi ca l forest, wooded grassland and shru blancl
He1bs; seasonally dry tropical and subtropical woodland, wooded grassland and
Reference(s} Steenis (1960); Allen & Allen (1981: 455)
grassland
See note.') under Phylacium; the fruits develop undergrou nd
Reference(s): Verdcou1t (1970c: 296 -300) ; Tatcishi & Ohashi (1977); Potter &
... ~ . Doyle (1994); Munyenyembe & Bisby (1997)
Placed in subt ribe Phaseolinae, allied to Do/ic/Jos (Thulin el al, 2004)
Wajira Thulin 1982
5 spp.; NE Africa (4 spp. in the Somalia-M;isa i region); l sp. (W gmha111ia11a
(Wight & Am .) Thulin & Lavin) widespread in the Sudano-Zambezian region of Alistilus N.EJ3r. 1921
Africa, Saudi Arabia and India to Sri Lanka
3 spp.; Southern Africa (S Za rn bezian region, 1 s p.), SC and S Madagascar (2 spp.)
Na med afler lhe \Vajir district in E Kenya whe1·e the type collection of che genus
From ala- (L: wing) and stihts (L.: stake, pen), refening to the characteristic style
was made
in the genu s
Climbing herbs or subshru bs; seasonally dry tropical bushland, giasslancl,
Herbs or subshrubs; seasona lly dry tropical open woodland , xerophytic scrubland,
woodland and foiest
bushland or grassland, often associa ted with rocky outcrops
Reference(s): Thulin (1982); Thulin el al. (2004)
Wajira is basally branching and sister to the rest of subtribe Phaseolinae (Thulin ~ ~ l\eference(s): Vcrdcourt in Mackinder et a/ , (2001: 84); Du Puy & Labat in Du l'uy
el al. (2002: 561-565)
~
el al. , 2004)
Placed in subtribc l'haseolinae, closely allied to Dolichos and Lab/ab
Sphenastylls angustifolia Photograph by A. f. Van Wyk & s. Malan Austrodalichos errobundus Drawing by P. Halliday
Physostigma mesoponticum Drawing bys. Ross-Craig Oxyrhynchus volubilis Drawing by E.5. w. (in herb K)
f~
ivfnjor pas ture and fodder- legumes, e.g ., ,1,r. ulrop11rp11re11m (DC.) Uib. (si1:1l10)
:ind ,\.f, lr11hyroides (L.) U1b. (phasy bea n)
From mys- (Gk .: mo use) and m11bos (G k : llowe1'), rcfoning lo the resemhbnce of
the llowers co the foci;1l c1ricalure of a l ~u ge-earcd mouse
Climb ing herbs; se1son;11ly dq• tropical wooded grnssland, chm n scrub, mcky
shrubbnd o r in was1c a1eas
Hcferencc(s): l.cwb & Delgado Salin:is ( 1994)
Placed in sub! t'i he Phaseolinae, allied to Macrop1ili11m (q ,v.) ( Del g~1do Salin;1.'> el
al., 19991, ::1nd sister eirhcr to~ Dolichopsis-S tm pl1oslyl es cl:1de o r to
J-Jacroj>lili11111 in 1hc "n:i lyscs of Hil ey-Hulling et o/. (2004)
p esmodieae byH.ohashi
'fhe tribe Derm cli~e as treat d by Ohashi et al. 19 1 Desmodieae as circumscribed here comprises 30
compri ed 27 genera an I c. 540 pecie in thre genera and (524)-527-(530) species (Fig. 48). The
subrribe-, th Biyinae, De modiina and L spedezina . tribe occurs in the tropical, subtropical and warm
Molecular analyses by Bailey et al. (1997) and Doyle et temperate regions of the world, but extends into the
al. (2000) show that Bryinae has affinities elsewhere; cool temperate and sub-boreal regions of E Asia and N
Lavin et al. (2001a) place it within the Pterocatpus America (except W of the Rocky Mountains). At generic
clade of the Dalbergieae sens. lat. (see page 309). The level subtribe Desmodiinae is most diverse in tropical
Btyinae are therefore removed from the Desmoclieae Sand SE Asia (Dy Phan et al., 1994), while temperate
here , as are two genera formerly placed in ubtribe E Asia (Yang & Huang, 1995) and N America (Isely,
Lespeclezinae ; Phylacium Benn. and Neocollettia 1998) are the centres of diversity of subtribe
Hems!., which are moved to tribe Phaseoleae (see page Lespedezinae. The tribe occurs widely from coastal to
393) on morphological, palynological and molecular montane areas, but not at high altitudes. Species are
evidence (Doyle et al., 2000; Kajita et al., 2001). The most commonly shrubs or subshrubs, sometimes herbs,
two remaining subtribes of Desmodieae are recognised rarely trees and are usually erect and 3-foliolate:
in this treatment as three groups, the Lespedeza, The Desmodieae have been considered similar to
Phyllodium and Desmodium groups, based on results tribe Phaseoleae (Polhill, 1981a) and were recently
of an analysis of the chloroplast gene rbcl (Kajita et al., shown to be a monophyletic lineage included within
2001). The Phyllodium and Desmodium groups Phaseoleae sens. lat. (Fig. 47, page 394), closely
correspond to subtribe Desmodiinae, and the related to subtribe Kennediinae (Doyle & Doyle, 1993,
Lespedeza group to subtribe Lespedezinae (with Bruneau et al., 1995; Doyle et al., 1997) and possibly
Campylotropis now comprising 37 instead of 65 species sister to Mucuna (Bailey et al., 1997; Doyle et al.,
as in Ohashi et al., 1981). 2000; Kajita et al., 2001) .
Lespedeza group
Campylotropis, Kummerowla, Lespedeza
Phyllodium group
Dendrolobium, Phyllodium, Ougeinia,
Aphyllodium, Ohwia, ?Hanslia,
Arthroclianthus, Nephrodesmus,
Tadehagi,.Aksch indlium, ?Droogmansia
Desmodium group
Monarthrocarpus, Trifidacanthus,
Desmodium, Codariocalyx, Hylodesmum,
Hegnera, Pseudarthria, Pycnospora,
Mecopus, Uraria, Christia, Alysicarpus,
?Desmodiastrum, Meliniella,
?Leptodesmia, ?Eliotis
Kummerow/a striata Photograph by H. Ohashi Lespedeza thunbergii Illustrator unknown (ex Kew col/ecrion)
Dendrol-Obium (Wight & Arn) Bent h. 1852 Aphyll-Odium (DC.) Gagnep . 1916
Desmodium subgen. Dendrolobium Wight & Arn. (1834) Dicerma DC. (1825)
18 spp.; India (3 spp.) to Japan (I s p.) and <1bunda nt in Indo-China (9 spp ) and 7 spp .; 6 spp. N Australia and Papuasia (New Guinea); 2 s pp. Malesia , S China
Malesia to Australia (6 spp) (Hainan), Indo-China, India and Sri Lanka
From dendrrm (Gk : tree) and /obion (Gk.: pod), with reference to s mall t1ees A compound of a- (GL without), phy/lon (Gk : leaf) and -odium. (L.: or -odio11
with woody pods Gk.: implying both li keness and smallness), 1eferring to the abse nce of leafy b1acts
Trees or shru bs, rarely he rbs; seasonall y d1y trop ica l forest, wood land, bomboo as found in Phyllodium
thicket or grassland Shrubs o r subsh rubs; seasona lly d 1y tropical forest, woodland, wooded g1assland
Reference(s): Ohashi (1973a; 1997a; 1998; 2004<1); Ohashi er al. Cl999b) and grnsslancl, often in sanely and open areas
Used for medicine Reference(s): Ohashi Cl973a; 1997b; 2004a); Ped ley 0996; 1999a)
'
'
13elgian Congo
6 spp.; endemic to New Cnledonia
Shrubs or subsbrubs; season:llly dry trorical plateau to mon t:ine woodland,
F1om neph ro- (GL kidney) and desm os (GL chain); with referen ce to the Joment
wooded g1assland, bushbnd or seasonally wet grassland
Shrnbs or trees; seasonal tropical scrub or wooclbnd, on hillsides and roc ky ridges
Refe1e nce(s} Lock (1989' 248 - 250); Verdcourt (2000, 27- 34)
Closely related to Arlhroclianlhus
Ve rdcowt (2000) notes that species arc very poorly defined and based on spa rse
Reference(s), Allen & Allen (1981: 459)
material; only a very rew true species may be 1ecognisable w hen abund ant
material is available; the lnclo-Chinese species D. godefroyana (Kuntze) Sch indL
was moved to Tadehagi (Ohashi, 1973a), and then to Akschindliwn (Ohashi ,
Tadehagi H.Ohas hi 1973
2003) A genus much in need of revis ion
c. 6 spp.; Jndi;i to Inda -China (5 spp.; centre of distribution); China, E Asia,
Used for fomge
Malesia, SW Pacific and N Ausnalia (I sp.)
Derived from the Japanese name of th e genu s
Subshrubs or shrubs; seasonally dry tropical to subtropical forest, scrub an cl
1
Monarthrocarpus Merr 1910
grnssland , in rocky a1eas or iiverine
Desmofischera Holthuis (1942); Desmodium section Monarlbrocmpus (Me ro°.)
Reference(s), Ohashi (1973a; 2003; 2004b)
H O hashi (1973)
O hashi (2003) delimits 2 subgenera in fodehagi
l sp.; E Malesia (S ulawesi, Philippines, Moluccas) and Papuasia (New Gui nea)
Used as folk lore medicine in Chi n£i
From mono- (Gk ., one), m1hron (GL joint), and cwpos (G k,, fruit); with
reference to th e single articled lament
Shn1bs; seasonally dry tropical fo rest and wood land
Reference(s} O hashi (1973a) as Des111odh1111 (M sewriformis (Benth.) Merr.l;
Ohashi (2004b)
fl
v J.r:.
Tadehagi triquetrum subsp. auriculatum Drawing by F. Crozier Monarthrocarpus securiformis Drawing by P. Halliday
psoraleeae by C. H. Stirton
'fhe tribe Psoraleeae as delimited by Stirton (198la), development, phytochemical, nodulation and recently
comprised 6 genera and c. 135 species, and until very molecular studies, however, show that Amorpheae are
recently (see below) the tribe has been of uncertain basally branching in dalbergioid legumes (Lavin et al.,
lineage. Key revisionary studies since 1981 have been 200la; Wojciechowski et al., 2004), whereas Psoraleeae
on Otholobium (Stirton, 1989), the New World members are nested within the Phaseoleae sens. lat.
of Psoraleeae (Grimes, 1990), and Cullen (Grimes, The Psoraleeae are sister to Phaseoleae subtribe
1997). Hallia was subsumed into Psoralea on the basis Glycininae (see Figs. 47 & 49) in a well supported clade
of data from inflorescence and flower morphology and based on rbcl sequences of Otholobium and
leaf anatomy (Tucker & Stirton, 1991; Crow et al., 1997). Bituminaria (Doyle et al., 1997). In addition Cullen
Lectotypifications of infrageneric taxa in Psoraleeae (but cited as Psoralea) is part of a fully supported clade
were made by Grimes (1988). As treated here, the with other Phaseoleae based on trnK-matK data (Hu,
Psoraleeae comprise a monophyletic group of 9 genera 2000; Hu et al., 2000). Adams et al. (1999) and Doyle
and 185 species (Fig. 49). The only generic problems & Doyle (2000) indicate a similar result using data from
remaining to be resolved are a) the generic position of the respiratory nucox-II gene (encoding subunit 2 of
Bituminaria acaulis (Steven) C.H. Stirt. (Stirton, 198lb; cytochrome oxidase). Psoraleeae are placed sister to
Grimes, 1997) currently included in Bituminaria Glycine with the basally branching Cullen sister to
subgenus Christevenia Barneby ex C.H. Stirt.; and b) the Otholobium, Psoralidium and Rupertia in the matK
status of eight species of South American Andean analysis of Wojciechowski et al. (2004). More sampling
psoraleas included by Grimes (1990) in Otholobium, an of Psoraleeae is needed in molecular analyses to
otherwise southern and eastern African genus. ascertain if the basally-branching genera are the
Prior to 1977 (Stirton, 198la), the Psoraleeae was southern African Otholobium and Psoralea (as
considered closely related to Amorpheae. Evidence suggested by Grimes, 1990) or Cullen (e.g., in
from a range of morphological , anatomical, floral Wojciechowski et al., 2004).
Phaseoleae subtribe
Glycininae (see page 394)
0tholobium
Psoralea
Orbexilum
Hoita ""ti
(J")
0
;;o
Rupertia )>
r
rn
rn
)>
Psoralldium rn
Pediomelum
Biturninaria
Cullen
~
of the genus and the e ight species from the Andes in S Ame1irn (G rimes, 1990) He rbs; warm temperate to meditenanean wood land, shnibland and g1assland
Used as med icine and for Aavouring food by smok ing Referencc(s), G!imes 0990)
Psoralea L. 1753
~ P1eviously included in Hoila by Rydberg (1919) but differs in its non-accrcscent
calyx and unique secondary inte1rn1l wall of the fruit
Hr;/lia Thunb. Cl 799); Lotodes Kuntze (1891) pro pa11e Used for medicine
c. 50 spp.; S and E of sou thern Africa (Cape and Afromontane regions, especially
common in mediterranean S and SW Cape, wilh fewer species in E parts to
Zimbabwe); outliers in Angola and St. Helena Is land (now extinct) Psoralidium Rydb. 1919
From psoraleo- (Gk,, scabby), referring to the calyx and leaves dotted w ith bbck 3 spp.; widespread in N Amelica in the Great Plains and co rd ille1an regions of S
or trnnslucent glands Canada to N Mexico
Shrubs, trees or herbs; seasonally dry tropical and meclitetTanecm lowland to Frompsora/eo- (GL scabby) and -idion (Gk,, diminutive) , 1efe11ing to its affinity
montane forest margins, shrnbland and grassland, in wetter habitats than Otho/obi11m with the genu.s Psora/ea
Heference(s): Fotbes (1930); Sti1ton (1989); Stirton & Schutte in Goldblatt & Herbs; continenwl and wa1·m temperate woodland, grassland and desert sc rub, on
Manning (2000: 505-507); Ve1dcou1t (2000: 48- 50) rocky slopes or in sandy a1·eas, dunes and alluvi<1l plains
The genus comprises many rare, little-known and undesc ribed species; Reference(s): Gr imes Cl 990)
monograph in preparation by Sti11on Grimes' (1990) concept of Psoralidium is more rest1ictive than that of Rydberg
Used as ornamen tals (1919) and the species limits aie broader
Used as a medicinal snuff
Orbexilum Haf. 1832
Rhytidomene Rydb (1 919)
8 spp., E USA from Virginia to Flrnicla, westwards through Kans<1s, Oklahoma Jnd
Texas; Mexico (south to Chi apas)
Rafinesque names are frequently obscure without obviolls de1ivation, bw in this
case he notes the rounded vexi llum petal as a distinguishing character of the genus.
If, however, he intended a combination based on orbiculan's - (L : circular) and
vexlllum (L' standard petal) then the suffix of the generic name is to be co nside1ecl
a misspelling
Herbs; wann tempe1ate woodland and g1ass land; montane in Mexico
Reference(s): Grimes (1990)
Orbexilum onobrychis Drawing by P. Halliday Used fo r medicine Psoralidium /anceolatum Drawing by P. Halliday
Cullen abtusifallum Photograph by B. E. Van Wyk Otholabium mexicanum (Andean species) Ph otograph by G. P. Lewis
Polhill & Sousa 0981) recognised 21 genera and c. 145 Robinieae (e.g., Lavin et al., 2003), or to the Loteae
species in tribe Robinieae (including Sesbanieae). This (incl udin g Coronilleae) clade with both being
treatment, following modifications of Lavin (1988, strong ly supported as sister to the Robinieae
1993, 1995, unpublished data) and Lavin & Sousa (Wojciechowski et al., 2004) . This, in addition to the
0995), recognises a separate tribe Sesbanieae (Fig. 50), putative position of Sesbania as the sister clade to the
comprising one genus, Sesbania, with c. 60 species. rest of Robinieae in the morphological analysis of
Recent molecular phylogen ies of robinioid Lavin & Sousa 0995), warrants its segrega tion here
legumes suggest that Sesbania is either sister to as a distinct tribe.
co
CVJj~~
- 9 o~ ..,,.
·)f__.,__.""-
Sesbania macrantha var. macrantha Photograph by C.S./.R.O. Sesbanio quadrata (1-10) Drawing by L. M. Ripley
FIG . 50 Diagram of relationships of tribe Sesbanieae after Lavin & Sousa (1995); Lavin et al. (2003)
Sesbania tomentosa Photograph by R.B.G.. Kew
The Loteae have been usually considered as the were previously distinguished by the lomentaceous
closest relatives of other temperate tribes, especially of frnits and branched root nodules in Coronilleae (fruits
the astragaloid part of Galegeae (e.g., Polhill, 1981k: non-lomentaceous and root nodules unbranched in
371- 374), and the monospecific genus Podolotus was Loteae sens. strict.). The Coronilleae were earlier
either allied with Lotus, or merged with Astragalus. placed in tribe Hedysareae (Bentham, 1865) because
Recent molecular data, however, have revealed that of their lomentaceous fruits.
Galegeae, Cicereae, Hedysareae, Trifolieae, Fabeae The merging of Loteae sens. strict. and Coronilleae
and Millettieae (in small part) lack the chloroplast- is supported by both morphological (Polhill, 198lk;
DNA inverted repeat (IR) which is present in the Lassen, 1989; Diez & Ferguson, 1990, 1994, 1996;
majority of Leguminosae including Loteae (Liston, Tikhomirov & Sokoloff, 1996a) and molecular data
1995). A study of the chloroplast gene rbcL also placed (Doyle, 1995; Liston, 1995; Doyle et al. , 1997; Allan,
Loteae and other temperate tribes in different clades 1998; Allan & Porter, 2000; Allan et al., 2003). These data
(Doyle et al., 1997), the Loteae being in a robinioid indicate that lomentaceous fruits have arisen
clade and the temperate tribes in an Inverted Repeat independently in Coronilleae and Hedysareae, and
Lacking clade (IRLC) . In recent supe rtrees of the perhaps even in different genera of Coronilleae. Allan
Hologalegina alliance (Wojciechowski et al., 2000, & Porter (2000: Fig. 2A) suggested, however, that
2004), Loteae sens. lat. are sister to Sesbania , and the lomentaceous fruits were a plesiomorphic condition
combined Loteae-Sesbanieae clade is itself sister to for Loteae sens. lat. In our opinion, an ancestor of
the Robinieae. Loteae might have had dehiscent fruits divided into
Loteae differ from Robinieae in a suite of characters regular compartments by thin transverse septa (as in
which were listed by Dormer (1945) for his 'epulvinate Sesbania and Lotus sens. lat.). The genera formerly
series', i.e., often herbaceous habit and leaves mostly placed in Coronilleae do not form a natural taxonomic
distichous , usually without a pulvinus. These unit at any level. Regarding fruit anatomy, lomentaceous
characters are now of less phylogenetic importance fruits of Securigera and Coronilla are related to
since the 'epulvinate series' is no longer considered to dehiscent fruits in the Lotus group, while lomentaceous
be a monophyletic group. An obvious synapomorphy fruits of Ornitbopus and Antopetitia share important
of Loteae, shared by all extant members of the tribe , features of pericarp structure with the indehiscent non-
is stamen filaments dilated upwards. This is an lomentaceous fruits of Anthyllis and Dorycnopsis.
adaptation for secondary pollen presentation. Another Recent publications have led to the removal of
apomorphy shared by almost all Loteae is the capitate some groups from Lotus sens. lat. (Lassen, 1986;
or umbellate partial inflorescence, while Robinieae Tikhomirov & Sokoloff, 1997; Sokoloff, 1999, 2000),
possesses racemes. A most unusual (and possibly Coronilla sens. lat. (Lassen, 1989) and Anthyllis sens.
synapomorphic) morphological character of many lat. (Lassen, 1986; Tikhomirov & Sokoloff, 1996a, 1997).
Loteae is the presence of a foliage leaf on the peduncle. Morphological and molecular data relevant to the
This leaf is often described as a bract, but it has neither relationships between Old World and New World
a flower nor other strnctures in its axil. Trne bracts in Loteae have recently been published (Diez & Ferguson,
Loteae usually lack a blade and are membranous or 1990, 1994, 1996; Kramina & Sokoloff, 1997a; Allan,
glandular. Phylogenetic evidence suggests the presence 1998; Allan & Porter, 2000; Allan et al., 2000, 2002,
or abse nce of the foliage leaf on the peduncle is 2003; Degtjareva et al., 2003). The placement of
homoplastic within Loteae. Podolotus in Loteae is now well supported by
The circumscription of Loteae has recently been morphological data. Allan & Porter (2000) and Allan et
expanded to include genera formerly placed in al. (2003), using nuclear ribosomal ITS, concluded that
Coronilleae (Polhill, 198lk & l; 1994). These two tribes Old World and New World Lotus sens. lat. belong to
TRIBELOTEAE 455
distinct clacles. In the latter analysis, Old World Lotus kl Worl I Ornithopu · (altb ugh with 1 sp. in th ~ Ne
forms a moderately supported monophyletic group if World) and Kebirita am n others. In this rr arme"'
Tetragonolobus and Dorycnium are included, while ·s consK
Loteac 1 · 22 genera and . nt
. Ie recI to comprise
2 2
New World Lotus is paraphyletic, also containing the species Fig. -n.
I I Hippocrepis
Scorpiurus
1 I
Securigera
Coronilla
Podolotus
Anthyllis
Hymenocarpos
Pseudo lotus Hippocrepis scobro Drawing by M. Y. Saleem Hippocrepis bo/earico Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Ornithopus rn Sh1ubs, suffrutices or he1bs; d1y subtropica l, mediterranean, warm temperate ;:ind
temperate shrubland, grassland and desen, and in disturbed places
Reference(s): Hrabetova-Uhrova (1949-50); Dominguez 0976); Schmidt (1979);
Lassen (1989); Talavera & Dominguez in Talavera el al. (2000: 897-935)
* Dorycnopsis Lassen (1989) transfened Coronil/a emerus sens lat in to Hippocrepis; this opinion
has been supported by studies of pollen morphology (Diez & Ferguson, 1996),
fruit anatomy (Sokoloff, 1997), and moleculrn phylogenies (Allan & Prnter, 2000;
Kebirita Allan er al, 2003), and is adopted he re; Hippocrepis emems (L.) Lassen possesses
pu1atively less-derived cha1acters such :1s long fruits with straight (not horsc-shoe-
shapecl) segments, and a shrubby habit
Ottley a Hippocrepis einerus js cultivated as an ornamental; othe1· species (horseshoe
vetches) are used frn medicine
Acmispon
Syrmatium
Scorpiurus L.1753
2 val'iable spp . (sometimes treated ;:is 4 spp .); S Europe, mainly Med iterranean
Lotus (including N Aflica), Macarone~ia and \V/ Asia
From sc01pio- (Gk.: scorpion) and oura (Gk .: tail), for the shape of the pod
Dorycnium Herbs; medite 1ranean shrubland, g1assland and disturbed places
Tetragonolobus Referencc(s): Heyn & Raviv (1966); Talavera & Dominguez in Tabve1a el al.
(2000: 935-942)
The gen us occupies an isolated position in the t1 'ibe; the simple leaves with
Tripod ion (t1sually) three main veins are most unusual in th e family
Sco1piu.rus verm iculatus L. (prickly scoq:>ion's rail) is used for forage; leaves and
Hammatolobium pods used for human food
Cytisopsis
FIG. 51 Diagram of relationships in tribe Loteae based on molecular (Allan et o/., 2003; Degtjareva et o/., 2003) and morphological data (Sokoloff, 2003a)
Nodes marked* are not supported in all analyses Scorpiurus muricotus Drawing by L. M. Rip ley
Lotus L 1753
Ottkya DD.Sokoloff 1999 Helnekenia Webb ex Ch rist (1887); Benediclella Maire (1924)
Lotus sect. Si111pete11a Ottley 0944) c. 125 spp. as treated he1e (c. 180 spp. in the broad sense); N Tempera te; here
13 spp .; SW USA and Mexico treated as exclusively Old World , mainl y Europe, Medi tenanean (including
Named afte1 Alice M. Ottley (1882 -1 971), American botanist who first Africa) and Macaronesia, eastwards to C, SW and E Asia (Sand \VI Siberia,
distinguished this group Mongoli<:1, Himalaya, China, Korea and japan); c. 2 spp. endemic to Australia and
Herbs or suffrutices; wa11n tempe1ate ornd mediterranean desert, serniclesc1t, 1 sp. to New Caledonia and Vanuatu , and c. 20 spp. in mo.s1ly 1n ntane tropict1l co
shrubland, bushland, woodland, and rudernl habitats Somal ia-Masai regions in Africa and Arabia
Reference(s), Ottley (1944); Sokoloff (1999); see also the references under Hosackia Fro1ll Greek Lolos; a name applied to various plants
Allan et al (2003) find no suppoit for the separation of Ottleya from Acmispo11 Herbs, suffrutices nnd shnibs; temperate, mediterranean, subtropical and t1opicnl
and Syr111ati11m; Degtjareva et al. (2003; in prep.) and Sokoloff (2003a) find good mo ntane grassland and shrubland, desert and disturbed places
support for the monophyly of 011/eya as well as Acmispon and Syrm aliu m Reference(s), Ilrand (1898); Chrtkova-Ze1tova 0966; 1973; 1984); K io·kbrid e (1994,
1999a); Krnmina (1999); Valdes in Talavera el al. (2000, 776-812); Allan et al,
(2002); Martins in Pope el al. (2003' 1-9)
Acmispon Raf. 1832 Po lhill (1981 k) adopted a broad concept of the genus, but Lassen 0986) and
Lotus sect Micro/01us Bentlt. (1836) Sokoloff (1999, 2000) accepted a number of segregates; the American species a1e
8 spp.; SW Canada, USA and Mexico; 1 sp. endemic to Chile treated he1e under Hosackia, 011/eya, Ac111ispo11 and Syl'lnatii1111 (Sokoloff, 1999);
From acme ( Gk : point, apex) and rhe rest of the name was unidentified; th e genus is taxonomically difficulr at specific as we ll as at sectional and
Rafinesque's names are often difficu lt to inte1prcr, blH he indicated that the name subgeneric levels; severnl species are extremely va1iable, e.g., L. col"niculalus L.
meant that the pod is hooked at the apex '1nd L auslralis Andr., and hybridisation is f1equent
He1bs; warm temperate and mediterrnnean desert, grassland, shnibland, Lotus co1·niwlaws (birclsfoot trefoil) and L pedu11cu/a1us Cav sens /al (big trefoi l)
woodland and ruderal h'1bit::1rs are major ag1'0nomic species, being valuable forage, pasture, green manure and
ltefeoence(s), Buokart el al. (1972); Sokoloff (2000); see also the references unde1 cover plants; a1her species are used in cosmetic skin care and, e g., L berlbo/etii
Hosackia and note under Ottleya M::1sf., page 454, and L. 111acula111s 13reitf. are cu\tivMed as omamentals
The treatment of Polhill & Sousa 0981) recognised 21 amalgamated. The Gliricidia group still includes the
genera and c. 145 species in Robinieae. This treatment, Antillean Poitea together with Gliricidia.
foll wing modifications of Lavin (1988, 1993, 1995), The monophyletic Robinia group comprising the
Lavin & Sousa 0995), Polhill 0994), Lavin et al. (2003), 'barbistyled' genera , Olneya , Robinia , Coursetia,
reduces the tribe to 11 genera and c. 72 species (Fig. 52). Peteria, Genistidium and Sphinctospermum, is sister
The phylogenetic positions of genera in Robinieae to the Gliricidia group in most analyses of Lavin et al.
(excluding Sesbanieae) have largely remained the (2003), although this is not strongly supported. The
same since Lavin & Sousa (1995), although recent only significant modification within the Robinia group
phylogenetic analysis of mo! cular (ITS/5.8S, /.rnl inrron is that four eclectic species, Coursetia hypoleuca (Speg.)
and matK locus) and morpho l gical data m .d l fu1the r Lavin and C. orbicularis Benth. (unifoliolate species
modification (Lavin et al., 2003). The Cuban Hebestigma formerly composing the genus Poissonia) , along with
is well supported as sister to the Mesoamerican Lennea the Peruvian C. weberbaueri Harms and the Argentine-
in the combined analysis of Lavin et al. (2003), and in Bolivian C. heterantha (Griseb.) Lavin (formerly
most analyses the two genera are sister to the Gliricidia composing the monotypic Neocracca) form a well
and Robinia groups. Within the monophyletic Gliricidia supported monophyletic group, here referred to as
group, Gliricidia is now demonstrated to be Poissonia, which in the analyses of Lavin et al. (2003)
paraphyletic with respect to Hybosema, so the two are is either sister to Robinia or to Sphinctospermum.
= Hebestigma
- Lenn ea
I! Gliricidia group
1, Gliricidia
"'- :::0
Poitea
~
0
co
Olneya z
Robihia rn
Robinia group )>
Poissonia rn
~
c;0·ursetia
Peteria
Genistidlum
Sphinctospermum
Inverted-Repeat-Lacking
Clade (IRLC)
Polhill (l 981a, h & i) recognised Galegeae and 53) is itself made up of several distinct clades. The first
carmichaelieae as distinct tribes. Within the Galegeae of these includes the vast majority of the species of
he distinguished four subtribes: Coluteinae, Astragalus. Wojciechowski et al. (1999) and Kazempour
Astragalinae, Galeginae and Glycyrrhizinae. Polhill Osaloo et al. (2003) find good support for Astragalus
(1994) added a fifth subtribe Alhagiinae . More recent sens. strict. as a monophyletic group, i.e., excluding
studies suggest that the Carmichaelieae are best treated only a very few outlying species (mentioned below).
as another subtribe within Galegeae, and this is Wojciechowski et al. (1999) also showed that genera
followed here. However, these studies also point such as Oxytropis, Sutherlandia and Swainsona, which
strongly to the polyphyly of Galegeae (Wagstaff et al., are morphologically very similar to Astragalus
1999; Wojciechowski et al. , 2000; 2004). Polhill's (although they have never been formally combined
concept of Galegeae appears to be in the process of within it), are in fact distinct and not nested within
disintegration into a number of smaller tribes, but Astragalus. Sanderson & Liston (1995) and
decisions on this would be premature until constituent Wojciechowski et al. (1999, and references therein)
taxa are sampled more comprehensively, and putative have clearly shown that the vast majority of New World
monophyletic groups can be substantiated by Astragalus form a single clade in which most of the
morphological and other systematic data. species have chromosome numbers in an aneuploid
Glycyrrhizinae Rydb. was recognised by Polhill series: n = 11, 12, 13, 14 or 15 (Spellenberg, 1976). The
(1981h) as vety distinct, but he left it as 'an outlying Old World taxa, on the other hand, have chromosome
subttibe of Galegeae'. Molecular analyses have confinned numbers that are euploid: n = 8, 16, 32 etc., and
the outlying position of Glycyrrhiza (Fig. 53). Although polyploids are common (Spellenberg, 1976). All the
it is a member of the Inve1ted Repeat Lacking Clade studies of Liston and his group (e.g., Liston & Wheeler,
(IRLC), it forms a basal grade or sister group, along with 1994) demonstrate that Astragalus, far from being a
such woody millettioid genera as Callerya and Wisteria, taxonomic ragbag, does in fact form a monophyletic
to the whole of the rest of the IRLC (Sanderson & Liston, group in which speciation has been particularly active;
1995; Wojciechowski et al., 2000; 2004). possible mechanisms have been discussed by Barneby
Galeginae, containing the single genus Galega (Fig. (1964) and Polhill (1981h).
53), is also isolated from the rest of 'Galegeae'. In A second small clade, sister to Astragalus, includes
Wojciechowski et al. (2000), it falls near the base of Biserrula pelecinus L. and Astragalus epiglottis L. These
their Vicioid clade (Fig. 53) and is sister to the Cicereae. are both annuals of the Mediterranean Basin and N
In Wojciechowski et al. (2004), Galega is sister to a Africa. Both have only five fertil e anthers and
combined Cicereae-Trifolieae-Fabeae clade, although dorsiventrally compressed pods . The position of
with relatively poor support. Such placements have not Biserrula has long been disputed but it has often been
been suggested before and careful morphological regarded as no more distinct from Astragalus than
studies are needed to see if they support the some of the other monotypic genera that have from
relationships suggested by molecular analyses . One time to time been split off, usually on account of their
of the prominent features of Cicereae is the distinctive pods (Barneby 1964: 26). The position of
craspedodromous venation of the leaflets and while the Biserrula at the base of the Astragalus clade (e.g., in
leaflet venation in Galega is not truly craspedodromous, Wojciechowski et al., 1999, 2001; Kazempour Osaloo et
Polhill (1981h) does give 'leaflet-nerves to margin or al., 2003), however, supports its current treatment as a
nearly so' as one of the characteristics of Galeginae. separate genus. Astragalus epiglottis, however, does
Astragalinae contains, inter alia, what is probably not seem to have been treated anywhere above
the largest genus of flowering plants - Astragalus - sectional rank.
with 2300-2500 species. Wojciechowski et al. (1999; The third clade (Fig. 53) within the Astragalean
2000) have shown that their Astragalean clade (Fig. clade of Wojciechowski et al. (1999; 2001), i.e., the
out that Astragalus sinicus and A. complanatus Caragana , Calophaca and Halimodendron, on the
resemble o ther Coluteinae in possessing non- other hand, form a monophyletic group sister to the Chesneya, Spongiocarpella,
interlocking wing and keel petals and a ciliate style Hedysaroid clade, and are here placed in Hedysareae. Gueldenstaedtia, Tibetia
(Lavin & Delgado, 1990). However, they also note that Sanderson & Wojciechowski 0996) and Wojciechowski
Wenniger (1991) has found stylar hairs to be quite et al. (2000; 2004) show that Alhagi appears to be Erophaca
widely sca ttered among sections of Old World best pl ace d in Hedysareae, in agre ement with (= Astragalus lusitanicus Lam.)
Astragalus, and suggest that the character may have Hutchinson 0964).
arisen several times. Kazempour Osaloo et al. (2003) In a tribe that is so clearly polyphyletic it is difficult Oxytropis
found that Astragatus vogelii (Webb) Bornm., from N to know how to arrange the constituent genera. For the
Africa, Arabia, W Asia, Pakistan and India, grouped purposes of this book, genera recognised in the tribe Biserrula, Astragalus epiglottis )>
with Colutea in their analyses, and they erected a new largely follow Polhill 0981h; 1994), although w ith Vl
-I
genus Podlechiella Maassoumi & Kazempour Osaloo modifications resulting from more recent research. The Astragalus, Ophiocarpus, ;:;o
(p. 22) to account for this species. This decision two major realignments since Polhill 0994) are the Barnebyella )>
G')
appears premature before detailed molecular analyses transfer o f the ge nera me ntioned a bove to the )>
of the Coluteinae are available, and it is not accepted Hedysareae and the inclusion of the Carmichaelieae Colutea, Oreophysa, Smirnowia, I
rn
here. The genera separated as Carmichaelieae by (Polhill, 1981i) within Galegeae. The arrangement of Eremosparton, Sphaerophysa )>
Polhill 0981i) also appear best placed in this clade genera in this treatment is that suggested by the z
(Heenan, 1998a; Wagstaff et al., 1999). They have been supertree of Wojciechowski et al. (2001). Not all genera ("")
Lessertia, Sutherlandia r
shown to form a monophyletic group, confined to have b een sampled; genera not represented in the )>
Australia and New Zealand. supertree have been intercalated in positions that 0
Swainsona rn
The fourth clade (Fig. 53), is made up of a appear to be appropriate from other data in , e.g.,
monophyletic and distinct Oxytropis. The isolation of Polhill (1981h). Likewise , with the excep tion of Montigena, Clianthus,
Oxytropis is reassuring but somewhat surprising as Astragalus lusitanicus, here treated as Erophaca, the Carmichaelia, Streblorrhiza
me mbers of the genus are often morphologically isolated species of Astragalus revealed by the supertree
extremely similar to species of Astragalus and can only have not been treated separately. Podlech's 0994)
Parochetus (see page 500)
be distinguished by the pointed keel petals and by placement of three isolated Astragalus species as
the pod septum that arises from the adaxial suture, genera (Biserrula, Ophiocarpus and Barnehyella) has
Galega
not the abaxial as in Astragalus. Species of Oxytropis been followed here. <
are widespread in the north temperate regions, often Although we have suggested that it is premature to ("")
on mountains. re-circumscribe tribal limits in this group, the bulk of Cicereae (see page 496) 0
Three further groups of genera, exemplified by a) taxa (i.e., thos e comprising Polhill 's subtribes 0
Erophaca haetica Boiss. (=Astragalus lusitanicus Lam.); Astragalinae [for the most part] and Coluteinae, and Trifolieae: Trifolium (see page 500) ("")
b) Chesneya plus Gueldenstaedtia and c) Caragana, tribe Carmichaelieae), are likely to become recognised I
)>
Calophaca and Halimodendron, are sister either to as a more narrowly defined tribe Astragaleae. As treated 0
Fabeae (see page 505)
the Astragalean clade, or to the Astragalean plus Vicioid here the Galegeae sens. lat. comprises 24 genera and rn
clade (Wojciechowski et al., 2000). Relatively poor
'I (2880)- 3030 - (3180) species.
Trifolieae: Ononis, Melilotus,
Trigonella, Medicago (see page 500)
FIG. 53 Diagram of relationships in tribe Galegeae sens. lot. after Wojciechowski et al. (1999; 2000)
fl
.
Astragalus L. 1753
Erophaca Boiss. 1840 Phaca L. sens strict (1753); Tragacantha Mill. (1754); Neodie/sia Harms (1905);
As/raga/us lilsilanicus Lam. (1783) Astracantha Podlech (1983)
1 sp. (with two subspp.); Mediterranean region (Spain, NW Africa ; Turkey, Lebanon) At least c. 2300 (largely based on curre ntly accepted names in Podlech, 1999) and
From eros (Gk.: dawn, spring) and phaca (a genus of legumes in synonymy under perhaps up to 2500 spp. in some 2 5 roxonomic sections; mainly N 1cmpcr:11c,
As/raga/us), referring to its early flowering from S and C Europe (chiefly Medil •m1ne<t11 region, including N Afrl .1 l, Mltldle
He1bs; mediterranean shrubland and bush land East, SW Asia and Sino-Himalayan region to W China (c 1200 spp, most diverse
Reference(s): Podlech 0993a); Podlech in Talavera el al. (1999) in Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan); also E Europe to C Asia, Mongolia, Siberia, NE
Originally placed in Astragalus but sepa rated by various authors; Podlech (1993a) China and Japan (c. 620 spp., mostly in former USSR); western N America (c. 380
suggested that it belongs in Sophoreae but in Flora Jberica (Podlech in Talavem el spp.); S America (c, 100 spp.); Af1ica (1 sp .)
al., 1999: 347-350) , he treated it as a subtribe within Ga legeae; it cannot be a From aslragalos (Gk . wo1d fo r a species of this ge nus)
member of Sophoreae since il lacks the Inverted Repeat (Liston, 1995); Shrubs and herbsi mainly medi terranean , warm to cool temperate, and semi-arid
Wojciechowski el al. (2000) place it as sister to their Astragalean clade to arid continental temperate grassland and shrubland, a few montane to dry
tropica l and subtropical
Oxytropis De. lso2 Re fe rence(s): valious sectional revisions by Pocllech and co-workers (Demi, 1972;
A ragal/11s Neck. ex Greene (1897) Podlech, 1975a & b, 1983, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1993b, 1994; Agerer-Kirchhoff, 1976;
300 - 400 spp.j Eurasia, most numerous and diverse in subarctic and mounrainous Agerer-Kirchhoff & Agerer, 1977; Ali, 1977; Ott, 1978; Podlech & Kozik, 1983;
regions of C Asia, a long a be lt of the Tianshan, Pamirs-Altai, Baerh asita i and Altai Tietz, 1988, 1994; Wenniger, 1991; Gazer, 1993; Maasso umi, 1993; Tietz & Zarre,
mountains to N & NW Ch ina, south to \YI Asia and Himalaya; N America (Canada 1994; Zarre & Podlech, 1994; 1995). Regional accou nts for fo rme r U.S.S.R.
and W USA, c, 22 spp, [Barneby, 1952], reduced to 10 e ndem ic spp. and 3 (Gontscharow in Komarov, 1946); Turkey (Chamberlain & Matthews in Davis,
circumboreal spp. by lsely [1998]) 1970: 49-254), Flora lberica region (Podlech in Talavera el al., 1999: 279-338); N
From oxy- (Gk: shallJ) and tropis (Gk,: kee l), for the characteristically beaked keel Ame rica (Barneby, 1964; Isely, 1998), and S America (Johnston, 1947). Recent
Herbs or cushion-like subshrubs; mainly cold and continental temperate phylogenetic analyses by Sanderson & Listo n (1995); Sanderson & Wojciechowski
grassland; many montane or alcimontane (1996); Wojciechowski el al 0999); Kazempour Osaloo et al. (2003)
Reference(s): Bunge (1874); listing in Yakovlev et al. (1996); Zhu & Ohashi (2000) Astracantha has been returned to Astragalus on both molecu la r and
for N Eurasia and China; Barneby (1952); lsely 0998) for N Ame rica morphological grounds (Liston & Wheeler, 1994; Sanderson & Liston, 1995; Zarre
Usually regarded as very close to As/raga/us and differing from it only in teclrnical & Podlech, 1995); single taxa have been split off as Eropbaca, Biserrula,
characters such as the pointed kee l with vascular bundles reaching the top of the Barnebyella and Ophiocarpus (q.v.) Kazempour Osaloo el al. (2003) find the
keel petals; rnolecular data, however, show that it is monophyletic and also not latter two genera to be well supponed within Astragalus; molecular data support
even the sister group of Astragalus, although it is a me mbe1 of the Astragalean th e separation of the first two genera and several other isolated species, bu t wide r
clade (Wojciechowski et al.. 2000); Zhu & Ohashi (2000) recogn ise 3 subgenera
sa mpling is still needed
and 20 sections (c. 125 spp.) in China A few species are significant economicallyi A . gummifer Labill. (gum tragacCJ.nlh), is
Used in medicine, as a food ingredient and as o rnamen tals; some species are used used for its gum in a wide range o f indust ries (ar least 20 other species are noted
fo r forage, others r1re poisonous to Jivestock (causing locoism) to produce gums [Duke, 1981]); A mongboliws Bunge var. daburicus (DC.)
Podlech (=A membra11aceus Bunge) is a w idely used traditional medicine; other
Biserrula L 1753
species (m ilk vetches) are used for human food (edible pods, but some species
I sp, (with 2 subspp.); Mediterra nean region and Canary Islands, E & NE Africa toxic), forage, erosion co nt1 ol, fuelwood and as selenium and u ranium indica tors
From bi- (L.: twice) and semtla (L.: a little saw); referring to the toothed crests on (Allen & Allen, 1981); some species are poisonous to livestock (locoweeds)
the pods
Herbi mediterranean and tropical montane grassland, shrubland and disturbed areas
Reference(s): Mathews in Davis (1970: 48-49); Thulin (1983: 190-192)
Often included in As/raga/us but there are only 5 stamens and the winged pods
are distinctive; its position in the supertree of Wojciechowski et al. (2001) supports
it being treated separately
Biserrulo pe/ecinus Photograph bys. Collenette Usefu l pasture legume for acidic soHs and for hay Astrogolus monspessulonus Photograph by c. Grey-Wilson
CJ)
1 sp ; Afghanista n, I ran, Tu rkmenistan , Uzbekistan
' Named for M.N. Smir•nov (1849 - 1889), Russian bota nist
Barnebyella r odlech 1994 J
J Shrub; dry sandy rlaces in semi-desert
\ Reference(s): Vassilczenko in Komarov (194 1: 315; Engl . trans l. : 235 - 236); Allen &
As/raga/us sect. Mirae Sirj & Rech.f.
1 sp.; fran, Afghanistan , Pakistan ~
' Alle n (1981); Yakovlev et al. (1996)
Named after R.C. Barneby (1911-2000), British-born legume specialist at New Smirnowia turkestana B unge is used as a 1raditional m edicine, the isoflavans have
York and monographer of Astragalus in N America, as well <is several other anti-protozoa n prope1ties, e g. aga inst malaria
legume genera
Herb; arid and semi-arid mediterra nean and subtropical grassland and shrubland
Reference(s): Podlech (1994) Eremosparton Fisch . & C.A.Mey_ 1841
Originally desc ribed as a Do1ycnium, but acco rding to Podlech (1994) it is neither 3 s r p.; SE Russia and Caucasus to C Asia and NW China
th is nor As/raga/us; Kazempour Osaloo el al (2003), however, find B . calyc ina From eremia (Gk : desert) and spa11on (Gk.: broom), resembling Stipa
(Stocks) Podlech to be well supported within As/raga/us; the pod is unilocula r tenacissima (esparto grass)
and 1-seeded, the peta ls are haily and the calyx e longates d uring anthesis Shrubs; continental temperate semi-dese1t shrubland on plains
Reference(s): Vassilczenko in Komarov 094 1: 31 0 -311; Engl. tra nsl.: 232-234);
Yakovlev et al. 0996)
Colutea L 1753 Used for forage, re habilitation of arid lands and medici ne; weedy
c. 28 spp.; C and S Europe a nd Mediterranean region (including N Africa) east to
\YI and C Asia (where the majority of spp. occur), N China and \YI Himalaya and in
NE tropica l Africa
From colulea (the Gk. name for this p lant)
Shrubsi medi terranean, warm or continental temperate w oodland, shrubland,
bushland a nd montane grassland
Reference(s): Browicz (1963a); Yakovlev el al. (1 996)
Used as ga rden orname ntals (notably the bladder senna, C. arborescens L. and
hybrids); pasture p lants; for soil stabilisation, erosion control and hedges; also for
wood (fuel and timber); a multi-purpose legumino us shrub for arid climates
Lessertia lanata Ph otograph by 8 .-E. Van Wyk Swainsona sp. Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Gal.ega L. 1753
6 spp.; C and S Europe and Mediterranean region (including N Africa), east to
Clianthus Sol. ex Lindi. 1835 Turkey, Caucasu s and Pakistan; monrane E Africa from Ethiopia to Kenya
2 spp.; New Zealand (N Island) From gala (Gk .: milk) and agetn (Gk.: to act); a reputed galactogogue (stimulating
From cleos (Gk.: glory) and anthos (Gk,: flower) both the production and flow of milk in nursing mothers)
Shrubs; subtropical thicket and low forest, often on cliffs and in alluvial or Herbs or subshrubs; warm temperate and t1opical montane grassland, bushland,
colluvial sites
woodland and forest
Reference(s): Wagstaff et al. 0999); Heenan (2000) Reference(s): Gillett 0963a); Gillett in Milne-Redhead & Polhill 0971 : 1051 - 1054);
Clianthus punfcetis (G.Don) Sol. ex Lindi. is critically endangered with only one Garcia Murillo & Talavera in Talavera et al (1999: 267-274)
wild population (Wardle, 1991; Heenan, 2000); it is, however, widely cultivated as Molecular studies (Wojciechowski et al., 2000) suggest that its closest relative
the kakabeak, lobster claw or glory pea; C. maximus Colenso is more widespread may be Cicer in the Vicioid clade, rather than the other taxa treated as part of
in east N Island but still vulnerable (Heenan, 2000); C.formosus has been
Galegeae
transferred to Swainsona (Thompson, 1990) Ga/ega officinalts L. (goats me) is a traditional medicine; species also used as
Used as ornamenrals
ornamentals, as herbs in cheese making 1 for soil improvement and as bee plants;
but apparently poisonous to sheep and goats
Carmichaelia R.Br. 1825
Notospa1tium Hook.f. (1857); Corallospanium J.B.Armstr. (1881); Chordospaitium
Cheeseman 0911)
23 spp.; New Zealand (mainly S [but also NJ Island)
Named after Captain Dugald Carmichael (1722-1827), Scottish army officer and
botanist
Small trees, shmbs or subshrubs; temperate and subtropical montane and
submontane screes, moraines and disturbed ground
Reference(s): Simpson 0945); Heenan 0995, 1996, 1998a & b); Wagstaff et al.
0999)
Heenan 0998a & b) has shown convincingly that Chordospartium, Notospaitium
and Cora/lospa11ium should all be sunk into Carmichaelia; in a morphological
cladistic analysis the three genera are nested within Carmichae/ia, and all three
hybridise between themselves and with Carmichaelia
Used as ornamentals
Carmichaelia glabrata Photograph by G. P. Lewis Galega lindblomii (1-9), G. battiscombel (10-12) Drawing by H. Wood
Hedysareae byJ.M.Lock
The history of Hedysareae is summarised by Polhill Onobrychis and Caragana. Hedysarum occurs in the
(198lj). Originally the tribe, as defined by De Candolle mediterranean, warm temp erate and continental
(1825) and Bentham (1865), incorporated most of the temperate zones of Eurasia and N America (where there
leguminous taxa with jointed fruits, in six sub-tribes - are four species with several subspecies and varieties).
Coronilleae, Eu-Hedysareae, Aeschynomeneae, Polhill (1981j) listed the number of species as 'about 100'
Adesmieae, Stylosantheae and Desmodieae. Hutchinson but Yakovlev et al. (1996) feel that this is much too low
(1964) was the first to treat the tribe in its present, and suggest 200 (reduced to c. 160 species here,
restricted, sense. As well as the genera here placed in excluding the recently resurrected generic segregates
Hedysareae, he included Corethrodendron and the Corethrodendron and Sulla (Choi & Ohashi, 2003)).
enigmatic Baueropsis (Bauerella) which is a synonym of Onobrychis with c. 130 species occurs only in Eurasia
Cullen (Polhill & Raven, 1981: 56), possibly based on C. and its centre of diversity is in the continental temperate
badocanum (Blanco) Verde. (A.S. George,pers. comm.) and warm-temperate zones of the Irano-Turanian region.
(= Baueropsis tomentosa (Schindl.) Hutch.). Polhill
The four genera sometimes regarded as part of Galegeae
regarded the Hedysareae in this restricted sense as a but forming the Hedysaroid clade (Wojciechowski et
single complex centred on Hedysarwn. and Onob1ychis, al., 2000) , are mainly Asian in distribution.
with a few minor segregate . Choi ' hashi (1 96), on Halimodendron includes a single species, a tree of
the basis of pollen morphology, held that there is little usually saline arid or semi-arid C Asia. The species of
basis for maintaining Taverniera and Stracheya as Alhagi are all spiny desert or semi-desert shrubs,
distinct from Hedysarum, and they supported Polhill's sometimes becoming weeds because of their ability to
(1981j) decision to sink Corethrodendron into sprout from the rootstock; specific limits are
Hedysarum . Polhill (1981j) himself had pointed out that controversial and it is possible that there may be just one
it is difficult to separate Taverniera and some sections variable species. Calophaca is a small genus (perhaps 8
of Hedysarum unambiguously, and that Ebenus and species) of shrubs and small trees, occurring from SE
Onobrychis are also very similar. Choi & Ohashi (2003) Europe to C Asia, usually in semi-arid sites. The largest
placed Stracheya into synonymy under a more nan-owly genus in this group is Caragana, which may contain
circumscribed Hedysarum, and recognised Sulla as a upward of 70 species, all shrubs, occurring from SE
distinct generic segregate; they also resurrected Europe to China.
Corethrodendron and maintained Taverniera as a Hedysareae is part of Polhill's 'Temperate Herbaceous
distinct genus. Choi & Ohashi (1998) proposed to Group' and has been traditionally placed close to
conserve the name Hedysarum with a new type species, Galegeae. Sanderson & Wojciechowski (1996), using
since the designated type species, H. coronarium L., nrDNA ITS data, found a strongly supported Hedysaroid
should now be placed in Sulla. Some 180 species clade within the Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade (IRLC).
currently in Hedysarum (estimates are increased here This also included Alhagi, a genus whose position has
based on Yakovlev et al., 1996), would otherwise need long been controversial. This clade was sister to a group
new combinations under Stracheya (the next available including Caragana, Calophaca and Halimodendron.
name with Corethrodendron and Sulla resurrected as Wojciechowski et al. (2000; 2004) obtained similar results
genera). Recent molecular sequence data using the chloroplast matK gene; this analysis placed the
(Wojciechowski et al., 2000) suggest that four genera 'Hedysaroid clade' as sister to the 'Astragalean clade'.
usually placed in a polyphyletic Galegeae, i.e. Alhagi, However, their supertree (Wojciechowski et al., 2001)
Caragana, Calophaca and Halimodendron, form a placed the 'Hedysaroid clade ' outside both their
single clade sister to Hedysareae and are best placed Astragalean and Vicioid clades. The Hedysareae remain
undersampled, and a full analysis including all the
within it - a course that is followed here.
The tribe as a whole usually occurs in dry open genera is overdue, both to improve our understanding
places with a continental temperate or mediterranean of the relationships of the tribe as a whole, and also to
climate, and is restricted to Eurasia, N America, and the help in the definition of generic limits within it. In this
Horn of Africa with Socotra. The tribe, as treated here, treatment, the Hedysareae comprises 12 genera and
is dominated by three large genera, Hedysarum, ( 400)- 427- (453) species (Fig. 54).
Caragana
Halimodendron
I
Alhagi rn
0
-<
(/')
?Eversmannia )>
Al
rn
)>
Hedysarum rn
Corethrodendron
Sulla
Taverniera
Astragalean clade
(see page 477)
Caragana Fa br. 1763
c. 70- 80 spp.; E Europe, mainly Caucasus, \YI an d C Asia to Mongolia, Chi na and
Himalaya, and into the Russian Far East
D erived fro rn the Latinised version o f 1he Mongolian name Khargana used for
Vicioid clade these pla nts
(see page 477) Shrubs or t1 ees; mainly continental tempe rate desert, grassland, (xerophyti c)
s hrubland, w oodlan d and forest, often montane
Refere nce(s): Fu (1993: 13 - 67); Ya kovlev et al, 0996); Sanchir (1999; 2000)
Some species are morphologically extremely similar to some species of
Astragalus, sharing the cu sh ion-forming habit wi th persistent spinescent lea f
rac hises
Used as orname nt als (C arhorescens Lam. or Siberian pea tree), for fo1age,
erosion contro l, shelter-belts and wi11dbreaks 1 fuelwood, dyes, medicine, human
? =uncertain placement in generic group food (pods) and as bee plants
FIG. 54 Diagram of relationships in tribe Hedysareae after Wojciechowski et al. (2000) Halimadendron argenteum Illustration by 5. Edwards
Onobrychls corduchorum (1-9) Drawing by M. Grierson Sartoria hedysaroides Drawing by P. Halliday Ebenus cretlca Photograph by J. Hooper
Ebenus L. 1753
Onobrychis Mill 1754 c. 20 s pp.; S Europe , mainly E Medite rranean (i ncluding N Africa), but cent red in
Dendrobrychis (DC.) Galushko 0980); Xan1bob1ychis Ga lushko (1 980) Turkey, Arabia, SW Asia and W Himalaya
From the Greek ebenos (a wo rd probably of Egyp tia n origin fo r another pla nt ,
c. 130 spp.; Europe and mai nly Med iterranean region (including N Africa south
to Ethiopia), Causasus, \Y/ and C Asia east in to Siberia, M ongo\i a1 China and \V/ not this)
Suffrurices; medite rranea n sh rubla nd and forest, o n rocky (often limestone) slopes
Hima laya
Reference(s): Huber-Mora th 0 965; in Dav is, 1970: 590 - 596); Aytac (2000)
Apparently fro m ono- (G k.: ass) a nd eithe r bnicbo (Gk.: to eat greedily) or brycbo
Used as an ornamental, e.g., E_ crelica L. (C retan sainfoin)
(G k,: to bray), beca use the smell of the plant was supposed to excite do nkeys to
the point of braying
H e.rbs or shrubs, some forming thorny cushions; mediterranean, tempera te, wa rm
and continental temperate grassland and s hrubland (often xerophytic)
Refe re nce(s): Sirjaev (1925-1 926); Hedge in Davis 0 970: 560 - 589); numero us N
Asian taxa listed by Yakovlev el al. 0996); Menitskii (2001)
The form of the fruit has been much used in taxonomy, but this seems variable
and authorities differ considerably about the nu mber of taxa that me rit
recognition, and the ra nk at which they sho uld be recognised
Many species are valuable fo rage plants (e.g., 0 viciifolia Scop., o r sainfoin) ,
also used for erosion control and as bee plants; a few species are cultivated as
o rn a m e nt~ls
Onobrychis - several species Drawing by l. M. Ripley Ebenus plnnata (A-H), E. armltagei (I) Drawing by M. Y. Saleem
I
1 I
I
Tribe Cicereae AJef. 1859
Cicer, the only genus in Cicereae (Fig. 55), occurs (2000 pla ed ice rea within th ir Inv it d R Jpeat
exclusively in the O ld World, with centres of la king Clade (JRL and within Lhi , in th ir idoid
distribution in W and C Asia. One of the 43 species dade. Galega and Ci ar si t r roup in thi
occurs in NE tropical Africa. Cicer arietinum L., the 'tnaly, i to th r ~ t f th Vicioicl ciad whi h in lud
chickpea, is widely cultivated in warm te mperate and Fabeae and Trifolieae ( . cepl Parochetus which is
subtropical regions. The genus was formerly placed in basally branching to the Vicic.id clade). The postulated
Fabeae (as Vicieae), however, Kupicha 0977; 1981b) relationship with Galega is un xpected and, p erhu ps
showed clearly that the genus is distinct and reinstated because of this , the morpholog-i al similaritie and/ r
tribe Cicereae. Steele & Wojciechowski (2003) and diffe rences remain unexplored . The analyses of
Wojciechowski (2003) find Cicer is best supported as Wojciechowski (2003), Steele & Wojciechowski (2003)
sister to the Trifoli eae -Fabeae clade. and Wojciechowski et al. (2004), suggest that Cicereae
Polhill Cl981a) had placed Cicereae as part of his remains a fa irly is lated group w ith respect to Galega
'temperate epulvinate series'. Doyle (1995) and Liston and the Trifo lieae-Fab a clade. In future, tribe
0995) grouped the Cicereae, Trifolieae, Galegeae, Galegeae sens. strict. is likely to comprise the single
Hedysareae, Fabeae (as Vicieae) and some genera genus Galega, although relationships with Parochetus
currently in Millettieae sens. lat., on the basis that they and Cicereae need to be studied further to ascertain if
lack the inverted repea t (IR). Wojciechowski et al. these should also be included.
CicerL. c1153).
43 spp.; Med iterr-.i nean reg ion 10 \VI and C Asia, Ca na1y Islands and NE tropical
Africa
The origin of Cicer derives from rhe classical Latin name of th~ chickpea
Herbs, sometimes sh rnbby; medilerranean and warm and conrmenta1 tempera te
gr.1 land and shrubland; perennial species often montane ~r upland ,
Rcfcrc nce(s), va n der Maesen (1972); Santos-Guerra & Lewis (1986); Sefe1ova
Parochetus (see page 477)
(1995); Coles et al 0998) . .
Cicer arielinum L. is a major pulse c1o p (chick pea, pois ch1che, ga rbanzo, Benga l
g ram, chana), loin ing peas and lentils as one of the three main foodpu lses; rhe .
Galega (see page 477) seeds are also giound into flour, used in soup, dha l and bread or are mashed with
oils and spices into hummus; ot her uses include starch, medicine and fodder
Cicer CICEREAE
FIG . 55 Diagram of relationships to tribe Cicereae after Wojciechowski (2003); Steele & Wojciechowski (2003); Wojciechowski et al. (2004)
Trifolieae forms a morphologically distinctive tribe, other tribe. The morphological cladistic analysis of the
although the position of both Ononis and Parochetus whole family by Chappill (1995) placed Trifolieae next
has been questioned (see below). In total there are 6 to Cicer. Kupicha (1977) had earlier suggested that
genera and c. 485 species, of which more than half Cicer is closest to Trifolieae, with the adnation of the
belong to Trifolium (Fig. 56). The distribution of the stipules to the petiole in Trifolieae being the only
tribe is centred in the N temperate regions of the Old differential character; the tribes Cicereae and Trifolieae
World, particularly in areas of winter rainfall. Trifolium also share the characters of long-stalked glandular
itself has spread into the tropics on mountains, where hairs and serrate leaflets with craspedodromous
there has been considerable diversification, particularly venation. Doyle (1995) placed Trifolieae, along with
in Ethiopia. It is also the only genus of the tribe to Carmichaelieae, Cicereae, Galegeae, Hedysareae,
occur naturally in the New World. Parochetus occurs Fabeae and some Millettieae in a group characterised
only on palaeotropical mountains. The importance of by the loss of the inve1ted repeat (IR) (Liston, 1995).
some genera as fodder legumes, particularly Trifolium Endo & Ohashi (1997) placed Trifolieae as sister to the
and Medicago, has led to their introduction to many Cicereae and Fabeae (as Vicieae) in a cladistic analysis
parts of the world. based on a range of non-molecular characters.
Ononis was placed in a tribe of its own, Ononideae, Wojciechowski et al. (2000) distinguish a Vicioid clade
by Hutchinson (1964) and this has been followed by that includes Trifolieae, Cicereae and Fabeae (as
some (e.g., Yakovlev et al., 1996). The distinctness of Vicieae), as well as Galega. Within this clade,
Parochetus (and of Ononis) was emphasised by Small & Parochetus is basally branching to the rest of the taxa,
Jomphe (1989), and Chauclhary & Sanjappa (1998a) have and Galega plus Cicereae form a sister group to a
placed Parochetus in its own subtribe Parochetinae. paraphyletic Trifolieae, with Fabeae emerging as sister
Within the core of Trifolieae, there are some to Trifolium. In a clade sister to Trifolium and Fabeae,
problems in generic delimitation, particularly between Wojciechowski et al. (2000) and Steele &
Trigonella, Medicago and Melilotus, with some (e.g., Wojciechowski (2003) place Ononis basally branching
Yakovlev et al., 1996) recognising the intermediate to the sister monophyletic clades Medicago, and
genus Melilotoides. Distinctive species here placed in Melilotus-Tn'gonella (Fig. 56). The latter three genera
Medicago have been variously segregated as Radiata comprise tribe Trigonelleae of Schulz (1901).
(Pseudomelissitus), Rhodusia, Crimea, Kamiella and Given that molecular phylogenies do not support a
Factorovskya. This treatment follows Small (1987) and monophyletic Trifolieae in its current form, further
Small et al. (1987) in recognising an expanded study may reinforce the pattern of relationships
Medicago including all those species with explosively suggested so far by these analyses. A tribe Trigonelleae
tripping flowers. In Trifolium, on the other hand, the could be recognised including the genus Ononis, and
generic boundaries are reasonably clear, but the unit tribe Trifolieae would then only include the genus
can be treated either as a large genus with several Trifolium, sister to tribe Fabeae. The Trifolieae in its
well-defined sections (the course followed here), or as broader paraphyletic sense is maintained here pending
the separate genera Amoria, Cbrysaspis, Lupinaster further study. The 'supertree' of Wojciechowski et al.
and Trifolium sens. strict. (see below). (2001) is not supportive of the segregate genera of
Trifolieae forms part of the 'temperate epulvinate Trifolium; more thorough sampling of Trifolium and
series' of Polhill (198la). In the same volume Heyn other large genera is desirable before any final
0981) was unable to suggest a clear relationship to any conclusions can be drawn.
TRIBETRIFOLIEAE 499
Hedysareae (see page 489)
Parochet us
Trifoliu m L 1753
Amoria C.Presl (1831); Cb1ysaspis Desv. (1827); Lupinaster Fabr. (1759); Bobrovia
Meli lotus A P.Khokhr (1998)
Trigonella c 250 spp .; principally temperate Eurasian (c. 150 spp ., wit h c. 130 spp. in the
Medi terranean region including Turkey), New World (mostly temperate N
America, c 60 sp p ); also tropical and subtropical montane areas (c. 36 spp in
Africa, some in Andes of S Ameri ca)
From tri- (L : three) and/o/i1m1 (L : leaO, for the trifoliolate leaves
He1bs; mainly meditenanean, temperate and tropical monrane grassland
Medicago Reference(s): Zoha1y in Davis 0970: 384 - 448); Zohary & Heller 0984 - gene ri c
acco unt); Steiner et al. (1997); Jsely (1998); Munoz Rodriguez et al in Talavera et
al. (2000: 647 - 719); Wa tson et al. (2000); Vidiga l in Pope et al. (2003: 45 - 52)
Roskov (1990a & b) recogn ises Tlifolittm in~ restricted sense and t1eats Amon:a,
Cb 1ysaspis and Lupinaster as good genera The molecular studies of Watson et al.
(2000), while they support Trifo/ium sens. lat as monophyletic, support ne ither
Amoria nor Trifolium sens. strict. as mo nophyletic; C/11ysaspis is so suppo1ted but
its recog nition would make T!?folium paraphyletic; no members of Lupinaster
were included in the analysis; the nine montane Africa n taxa sampled form a
monophyletic g roup within Trifoli11m
Introduced world wide for fodd er, soil and pasture improvement, as honey plants,
hay and silage, and in hrnticullu re; T repens L. (w hite clover) is probably the most
widely grown species with the greatest impact on agricullure of any cultivated
forage plant; T pratense L. (red clover) is also used fof medicine; some species are
eaten as human food; crefoil dermatitis associated with photosensitisation is a
problem caused by animal ingescion of some TrifoUum species
FIG. 56 Diagram of relationships in tribe Trifolieae sens. lat. after Wojciechowski (2003); Steele & Wojciechowski ( 2003 )
Widely known as the Vicieae, the correct name for this relative of the tribe; she had previously (Kupicha, 1977)
tribe is Fabeae (see Greuter et al., 2000, A.tticles 19.4 and excluded Abrus (Abreae) and Cicer (Cicereae) from it.
18.5), since it must be based on the name of the type The morphological analysis of Chapp ill (1995) placed
genus of the family, Faba Mill. ( = Vicia L.). n1is does not Fabeae (as Vicieae) in a group with Astragalinae,
reflect on the names Leguminosae and Papilionoideae Galeginae, Loteae, Coronilleae, Cicereae and Trifolieae.
(see introduction) whose use as alternative names for Doyle 0995) included these subtribes and tribes
Fabaceae and Faboideae respectively is sanctioned in (except Loteae and Coronilleae) in a clacle
the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature characterised by the loss of the inverted repeat (the
(Greuter et al., 2000; Article 18.5). IRLC), with Carmichaelieae (here included in Galegeae
Fabeae is a well-clefinecl tribe, forming part of the sens. lat.), Cicereae, Ga legeae, Hedysareae, some
'temperate epulvinate series' (Polhill, 1981a). It contains Millettieae , a nd Trifolieae. More recent work
five genera, of which two (Lathyrus and Vicia) are (Wojciechowski et al., 2000) places Fabeae at the heart
large . The tribe as a whole is centred in the Irano- of a Vicioid clade that includes Trifolieae (q.v.) and
Turanian Region of the E Mediteffanean. Lathyrus and Cicereae as well as Galega - a fragment of a
Vicia, each with about 160 species, have very similar paraphyletic Galegeae. Fabeae (as Vicieae) appears
distributions centred on the Mediterranean but embedded within Trifolieae as sister to Tr!folium.
extending throughout Europe, N Asia and N and In the analyses of Steele & Wojciechowski (2003)
tropical E Africa , with secondary centres in N America and Wojciechowski et al. (2004), Fabeae (as Vicieae)
and S America. One large group of species, some in forms a clearly rnonophyletic group in which Pisum is
Vicia and some in Latbyrus, are superficially extremely sister to Lathyrus, and these two emerge as a well
sim il ar and can only be distinguished by technica l supported clacle within a paraphyletic Vicia. A subclacle
characters of the style. This group was in the past of Vic ia species is sister to Lens. Within Latbyrus, the
recognised as the genus Orobus L. (Kupicha, 1981a). cpDNA restriction site phylogeny of Asmussen & Liston
Lens has 4 - 6 species and Pisum 2 or 3. Both include 0998) agrees in general with dividing the genus into
important crop plants and, perhaps because of this, sections previously recognised using classical taxonomic
their taxonomy is controversial. Both are E methodology (e.g., Kupicha, 1983).
Mediterranean genera with outlying species. The The publications of the Vicieae Database Project (e.g.,
monospecific genus Vavilovia, sometimes included in Allkin et al., 1983 a & b) provide basic information for the
Pisu.m, is confined to montane habitats in W Asia. whole tribe. In this treatment the Fabeae is considered
Kupicha (1981a) was unable to suggest a closest to comprise 5 genera and c. 329 species (Fig. 57).
Pisum
Vavilovia
FIG. 57 Diagram of relationships in tribe Fabeae after Steele & Wojciechowski (2003); Wojciechowski et al. (2004)
LEFT Vicio foba Photograph by G. P. Lewis
Vicia L. 1753
Lathyrus L 1753
c. 160 spp.; mostly N temperate regions: Europe and Asia (c. JOO spp., principally
Faba Mill. (1754); Anatropostylia (Plitmann) Kupicha 0973) Mediterranean and Irano-Turanian, some spp. to China, Korea and japan) and N
c. 160 spp.; mostly N temperate: Europe and Asia (c. 110 spp., principally from to E Africa (c. 5 spp.), with additional centres in N America (c. 30 spp.) and
the Mediterranean and lrano-Turanian regions, some spp~ to China, Korea and
temperate S America (c, 23 spp.)
Japan); N to E Africa (c. 15 spp.); additional centres in N America (c. 17 spp., From /athyros (Gk.: the name of a pea or pulse)
including 1 sp. in Hawaii) and temperate S America (c. 18 spp.) Herbs (often climbing); temperate , mediterranean and tropica l montane grassland,
Derived from the Larin name for a vetch
shrubland and woodland
H erbs (most ly climbing); temperate, mediterranean and tropical mon cane Refe rence(s): Bassler (1973, 1981); Kup icha (1983); Allkin et al. (1985, 1986);
grassland, sh rubland and woodland Asmussen & Liston (1998); Neubert & Miotto (2001); Kenicer (2003)
Reference(s): Davis & Plitmann in Davis 0970: 274-325); Kupicha (1976); Allkin Mony sped.,,; nrc widely introducc:d :md nnturallscd' used cx1c11sivcly os <:Md'
et al (1983a, b & c, 1986); Maxted (1993); Romero Zarco in Talavera et al. 0999: crops, fur fodder (e.g .. /•. clc~m L, /.. bfls1/111s I.. :ind L. sa//1111s L); as orn:tmc111als
361 - 417); Wouw et al. (2001; 2003) (e.g., l odom111s 1- l>weet pc<•), '" lnt/folf11. I. I "'Crl:isting pc.11 :ind /_ $.J~VC.</1-is L.)
Many species are widely introduced and naturalised (sorne are weeds)i vetches a nd n lnno:on rood (e.g., l . sn1iu11.< (gr.i:;s I"""'• !ndl:on pea, d1Jckllng vet hi. L
are used extensively as cove r crops, for forage , hay, silage, erosion control and ochms (L.) DC. and L. montanus 13ernh. (with edible root tubers) and also for
green manure; V.faba L. (broad bean, fava bean) is a major pulse crop, also erosion control, as green manure and for medicine; toxins are present in some
eaten green, with many cultivars in the trade; V. narbonensis L. is a minor pulse
species, causing lathyrism
crop; several other species (e.g., V. saliva L., V. ervilia (1.) Willd and V. viltosa
Roth) are cultivated as fodder; V. saliva (common vetch) is also used for
medicine; in various species occasional toxicity (causing favism) is found from
amino glucosides in seeds
Pisum i. 1753
2- 3 spp.; Mediterranean and W Asia; cultivated worldwide in temperate regions
Derived from the Latin name for the pea planr
Herbs (often climbing); mediterranean grassland and shrubland; weedy
Reference(s} Davis in Davis (1970: 370-372); Ben-Ze'ev & Zo haty 0973);
Lamprecht 0974); Maxted (2000); Maxted & Ambrose (2001)
The taxo nomy is complicated with both inter- and infraspecific classification
disputed
Piswn salivum L (common or garden pea) is a major pulse and green vegetable
crop, with many cultivars in the trade; also grown as fodd er, ground cover, green
manure, hay and silage
All works with three or more authors are arranged chronologically for ease of cross-refere ncing to the 'First author
et al.' citations in the text (see the references section in 'About the book', pages xiii-xiv). Dates of publication
are highlighted in bold in these cases to help readers locate the appropriate reference.
Adams, K.L., Song, K., Roessler, P.G. , Nugent, J.M., Doyle, ].L., Doyle, Akulova Z.V. (1985). The ways of morphological evolution in the
].]. & Palmer, J.D. (1999). Intracellular gene transfer in action: genus Antbyllis L. In Proc. 7 Conj of Young Scientists, VL.
dual transcription and multiple s ilencings of nuclear and Ko1narov Botanical Institute: 29-36. Moscow. (in Russian) .
mitochondrial cox2 genes in legumes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. Ali, S.l. (1962). A taxonomic revision of the genus Gueldenstaedtia
96 (24): 13863-13868. Fisch. Candollea 18: 137-159.
Adema, F. (1997). Notes on Males ian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- Ali , S.l. (1968). Paracalyx Ali, a new papilionaceous genus. Univ .
Papilionoideae). 2. The genus Canavalia Adans. Blumea 42:
Stud. (Karachi) 5: 93-97.
249- 253.
Ali, S.I. (1977). Papilionaceae. In E. Nasir & S.I. Ali (eds.), Flora of
Adema , F. (1998). otes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- West Pakistan, No. 100. University of Karachi, Karachi. Pp. 389.
Papilionoideae). 3. The genera Dioclea, Luzania and
Macropsychanthus. Blumea 43 : 233 - 239 . Ali, S.l. & Sokoloff, D.D. (2001). A new combination in Pseudo/otus
Rech.f. (Leguminosae: Loteae). Kew Bull. 56: 721-723.
Adema, F. (1999). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-
Papilionoideae) . 5. The genus Sarcodum. Blumea 44: 407-409. Allan, G .]. (1998). Lotus L. (Loteae: Fabaceae): Subgeneric delimitation
and relationship to Coro nil/a L. (Coron illeae). In Abstr. Ann . Meet .
Adema, F. (2000a) . Notes on Malesian Fabaceae XX. Derris in Bot . Soc. Amer., Baltimore, Md., 2-6 Aug., 1998: 112.
Thailand and Malesia. Tbai Forest. Bull., Bot. 28: 2-16.
Allan, G.]. & Porter, J.M. (2000) , Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic
Adema, F. (2000b) . Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae)
Papilionoideae): 6. The rare genus Burkilliodendron. Gard. Bull. with special reference to Lotus: evidence from nuclear ribosomal
Singapore 52: 5-10. ITS sequences. Amer.]. Bot. 87: 1871-1881.
Adema, F. (2000c). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- Allan, G.]., Zimmer, E.A. & Wagner W.W. (2000). Biogeographic
Papilionoideae): 7. The genus MU/ettia. Blumea 45: 403-425. relationships between western Noith American and Mediterranean
Ad e ma, F. (200 1). Millettia and Pongamia (Leguminosae- floras: insights from molecular phylogenetic studies of tribe Loteae
Papilionoideae) in Malesia. In L.G. Saw, L.S.L. Chua, and K.C. (Fabo ideae: Fabaceae). Botany 2000. ew Frontiers in Botany.
Khoo (eds.), Taxonomy: the cornerstone of biodiversity. Proceedings August 6-10, 2000. Oregon Convention Center. Portland, Oregon.
of the Fou1th International Flora Malesiana Symposium, 1998, pp. Abstracts. http-//www.botaay20QQ,o®'sect!onl3/abstracts/3 slllml.
41- 50. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia. Allan, G.J., Wenzel, E., Francisco-Ortega, J . & Santos-Guerra, A.
Adema, F. (2003a). Notes on Males ian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- (2002). Defining the geographic origin and evolution of Canary
Papilionoideae): 9. The genus Paraderris. Blumea 48: 129-144 Island Lotus subgenus Pedrosia: evidence based on ITS sequences
of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Abstracts of Botany 2002 Conference.
Adema, F. (2003b). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-
University of Wisconsin , Madison.
Papilionoideae): 10. The genus Alysicarpus. Blumea 48: 145-152.
Allan , G.]., Zimmer, E.A. , Wagner, W.W. & Sokoloff, D.D. (2003).
Adema, F. (2003c). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- Molecular phylogenetic ana lysis of tribe Loteae (Leguminosae):
Papilionoideae) 11. The genus Denis. Blumea 48: 393-419. implications for classification and biogeography. In B.B. K..litgaard
& A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 10, Higher
Adema , F. & Barham, J. (2002). A new species of Cruddasia
(Leguminosae) from Thailand. Kew Bull. 57: 223-226. Level Systematics: 371-393. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Allen, 0.N. & Allen, E.K. (1981). Tbe Leguminosae: a source book of
Agerer-Kirchhoff, C. (1976). Revision von Astmgalus L. sect.
cha racteristics, uses and nodulation. University of Wisconsin
Astragalus (Leguminosae). Boissiera 25: 1-197.
Press, Wisconsin. Pp. 812.
Agerer-Kirchhoff, C. & Agerer, R. (1977). Eine neue Sektion der
Gattung Astragalus L.: Laxiflori Agerer-Kirchhoff. Mitt. Bot. Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D., White, R.J., Bisby, F.A., & Adey, M.E.
(1983a). List of species and subspecies in the Vicieae. Vicieae
Staatssamml. Miinchen 13: 203-234.
Database Project Puhl. 1. University of Southampton.
Ainouche, A., Bayer, R.J ., Cubas, P. & Misset, M.T. (2003).
Phylogenetic relationships within tribe Genisteae (Papilionoideae) Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D., White, R.J., Bisby, F.A. & Adey, M.E .
(1983b). Names and synonyms of species and subspecies in the
with special reference to genus Ulex . In B.B. Klitgaard & A
Vicieae. Vicieae Database Project Puhl. 2. Universi ty of
Bruneau (eels.), Advances in Legume Systematics 10, Higher Level
Systematics: 239-252. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Southampton .
Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D., White, R.J., Bisby, F.A. & Adey, M.E .
Akiyama, S. (1985). A revision o f the ge nus Lespedeza section
(1983c). The geographical distribution of Vicia . Vicieae Database
Macrolespedeza (Leguminosae). Bull. Univ. Mus . Univ. Tokyo 33:
Project Puhl. 5. University of Southampton.
1-170.
Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D., White, R.J., Bisby, F.A. & Adey, M.E.
Akiyama, S. & Ohba, H. (1985). The branching of the inflorescence
(1985). The geographical distribution of Lathyrus. Vicieae
and vegetative shoot and taxonomy of the genus Kummerowia
Database Project Puhl. 6, University o f Southampton.
Delonix pumilo - Tribe Caesalpinieae Photograph by o. Du Puy (Leguminosae). Bot. Mag . (Tokyo) 98: 137- 150.
All works with three or more authors are arranged chronologically for ease of cross-referencing to the 'First author
et al.' citations in the text (see the references section in 'About the book', pages xiii-xiv). Dates of publication
are highlighted in bold in these cases to help readers locate the appropriate reference.
Adams, K.L., Song, K., Roessler, P.G., Nugent, J.M., Doyle, J.L., Doyle, Akulova Z.V. (1985). The ways of morphological evolution in the
].]. & Palmer, J.D. (1999). Intra cellular gene transfer in action: genus Anthyllis L. In Proc . 7 Conj of Young Scientists, V.L .
dual tra n scription and multiple silencings of nuclear and Komamv Botanical Institute: 29-36. Moscow. (in Russian).
mitochondrial cox2 genes in legumes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US.A. Ali, S.I. (1962). A taxonomic revision of the genus Gueldenstaedtia
96 (24): 13863-13868. Fisch. Candollea 18: 137-159.
Adema, F. 0997). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- Ali, S.l. (1968). Paracalyx Ali, a new papilionaceous genus. Univ .
Papilionoideae). 2. The genus Canavalia Adans. Blumea 42: Stud. (Karachi) 5: 93-97.
249-253.
Ali, S.l. (1977). Papilionaceae. In E. Nasir & S.I . Ali (eds.), Flora of
Adema, F. 0998). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- West Pakistan, •o. 100. University of Karachi, Karachi. Pp. 389.
Papilionoideae). 3. The genera Dioclea, Luzania and
Macropsychanthus. Blumea 43: 233-239. Ali , S.I. & Sokoloff, D.D . (2001). A new combination in Pseudolotus
Rech.f. (Leguminosae: Loteae). Kew Bull. 56: 721-723.
Adema, F. (1999) . Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-
Papilionoideae). 5. The genus Sanodum. Blumea 44: 407-409. Allan, G.] . 0998). Lotus L. (Loteae: Fabaceae): Subgeneric delimitation
and relationship to Coron ilia L. (Coronilleae). In Abstr. Ann. Meet.
Adema, F. (2000a) . Notes on Malesian Fabaceae XX. Derris in Bot. Soc. Amer., Baltimore, Md., 2-6 Aug., 1998: 112.
Thailand and Malesia. Thai Forest. Bull., Bot. 28: 2-16.
Allan, G.J. & Porter, J.M. (2000). Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic
Adema, F. (2000b). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae)
Papilionoideae): 6. The rare genus Burkilliodendron. Gard. Bull. with special reference to Lotus: evidence from nuclear ribosomal
Singapore 52: 5-10. ITS sequences. Amer.]. Bot. 87: 1871 - 1881.
Adema, F. (2000c). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- Allan, G.j. , Zimmer, E.A. & Wagner W.W. (2000). Biogeographic
Papilionoideae): 7. The genus Millettiet. Blwnea 45: 403-425. relationships between western North American and Mediterranean
Adema, F. (200 1) . Millettia and Ponget1nia (Leguminos ae- floras: insights from molecular phylogenetic studies of u·ibe Loteae
Papilionoideae) in Malesia. In L.G . Saw, L.S.L. Chua, and K.C. (Faboideae: Fabaceae). Botany 2000. ew Frontiers in Botany.
Khoo (eds.), Taxonomy: the cornerstone of biodiversity. Proceedings August 6-10, 2000. Oregon Convention Center. Portland, Oregon.
of the Fourth International Flora Malesiana Symposium, 1998, pp. Abstracts. htrp://www.l?01aoy,,QQQ oralsCC'tion13/ab: tr:\t'ts/3,shtml.
41-50. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia. Allan, G.J., Wenzel, E., Francisco-Ortega, ]. & Santos-Guerra, A.
Adema, F. (2003a). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- (2002). Defining the geographic origin and evolution of Canaiy
Papilionoideae): 9. The genus Paraderris. Blumea 48: 129-144 Island Lotus subgenus Pedrosia: evidence based on ITS sequences
of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Abstracts o f Botany 2002 Conference.
Adema, F. (2003b). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae-
University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Papilionoideae): 10. The genusA!ysicmpus. Blumea 48: 145-152.
Allan, G.j., Zimmer, E.A., Wagner, W.W. & Sokoloff, D.D. (2003).
Adema , F. (2003c). Notes on Malesian Fabaceae (Leguminosae- Molecular phylogenetic ana lysis of tribe Loteae (Leguminosae) :
Papilionoideae) 11. The genus Derris. Blumea 48: 393-419. implications for classification and biogeography. In B.B. Klitgaard
& A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 10, Higher
Adema , F. & Barham, J . (2002) . A new spec ies of Cruddasia
Level Systematics: 371-393. Royal Botanic Gardens , Kew.
(Legum inosae) from Thailand. Kew Bull. 57: 223-226.
Allen, 0.N. & Allen, E.K. (1981). 77n Leguminosae: a source book of
Agerer-Kirchhoff, C. 0976). Revision von Astragalus L. sect.
characteristics, uses and nodulation. University of Wisconsin
Astragalus (Leguminosae). Boissiera 25: 1-197.
Press, Wisconsin. Pp. 812.
Agerer-Kirchhoff, C. & Agerer, R. (1977). Eine neue Sektion der
AJlkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D., White, R.J., Bisby, P.A., & Adey, M.E .
Gattung Astragalus L.: Laxiflori Agerer-Kirchhoff. Mitt. Bot.
(1983a). List of species and subspecies in the Vicieae. Vicieae
Stetatssamml. Munchen 13: 203-234.
Database Project Puhl. L University of Southampton.
Ainouche, A., Bayer, R.J ., Cubas , P. & Misset, M.T. (2003) .
Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D ., White, R.J.. Bisby, P.A. & Adey , M.E.
Phylogenetic relationships within tribe Genisteae (Papilionoideae)
(1983b). ames and synonyms of species and subspecies in the
with special reference to genus Ulex. In B.B. Klitgaard & A.
Vicieae . Vicieae Database Project Puhl . 2. University of
Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 10, Higher Level
Systematics: 239-252. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Sou thampton.
Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D ., White, R.J., Bisby, P.A. & Adey, M.E.
Akiyama, S. (1985). A revision of the genus Lespedeza section
(1983c). The geographical distribution of Vici a. Vicieae Database
Macrolespedeza (Leguminosae). Bull. Univ. Mus. Univ. Tokyo 33:
Project Puhl. 5 . University of Southampton .
1-170.
Allkin, R., Macfarlane, T.D., White, R.J., Bisby, P.A. & Adey, M.E.
Akiyama, S. & Ohba, H. (1985). The branching of the inflorescence
(1985). The geographical distribution of Lathyrus. Vicieae
and vegetative shoot and taxonomy of the genus Kummerowia
Database Project Puhl. 6, University of Southampton.
Delonix pumlla - Tribe Caesalpinieae Photograph by o. ou Puy (Leguminosae). Bot. Mag . (Tokyo) 98: 137- 150.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 513
512 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Borissova, A. 0964). Tribus novae familiae Leguminosae. Novosti Sist. (Legum inosae: Papilionoideae, Sophoreae). Kew Bull. 52(2): Bruneau, A., Breteler, F.J., Weiringa, ].]., Gervais, G.Y.F. & Forest, F. Buzek,(;. (1992). Fruits of "Pterocarpus" tertiarium Weyland from
Vyssh . Rast. 1964: 223-225. 471-475 . (2000). Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and the North-Bohemian Basin, Czechoslovakia . In P.S. Herendeen &
Bosman, M.T.M. & De Haas, A.J.P. (1983). A revision of the genus Detarieae as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. In D.L. Dilcher (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics: 4. The Fossil
Briones, O.L. (1988). Nuevo registro para Mexico de Gleditsia
Tephrosia (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in Malesia. Blumea 28: P.S. Herendeen & A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Record: 19-31. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew .
(Leguminosae). Bal. Soc. Bot. Mexico 48: 143-144.
421-487. Systematics 9: 121-149. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew .
Cameron, B.G. & Prakash, N. (1990). Occurrence of giant antipodals
Britton, N.L. 0927). Stahlia monosperma, Cabana negra, native of
Bosser,]. & Rabevohitra, R. 0996). Dalhergia in Madagascar. Bull. Bruneau, A., Forest, F., Herendeen, P.S., Klitgaarcl, B.B. & Lewis, G.P. in the female gametophytes of Australian Bossiaeeae, Indigofereae
Puerto Rico, Family Caesalpiniaceae. Addisonia 12: 33.
Mus . Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 18: 171-212. (2001) . Phylogenetic relationships in Caesalpinioideae and Mirbelieae (Leguminosae). Austral.]. Bot. 38: 395-401.
Britton, N.L. & Killip, E.P. 0936). Mimosaceae and Caesalpiniaceae (Legumlnosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences.
Brako, L. & Zarncchi, ].L. (1993). Catalogue of the flowering plants Cameron, B.G. & Prakash, N. (1994). Variations of the megaga-
of Colombia. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 35: 101-208. Syst. Bot. 26: 487-514.
and Gymnosperms of Peru. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. metophyte in the Papilionoideae. In l.K. Ferguson & S. Tucker
45. Pp. 1286. Britton, N.L. & Rose, ].N. (1928). (Rosales) Mimosaceae. North Buijsen, J.R.M. (1988). Revision of the genus Fordia (Papilionoideae- (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 6, Structural Botany:
American Flora 23 0-3): 1-194. New York Botanical Garden. Millettieae). Blumea 33: 239-261. 97-115. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Brand, A. (1898). Monographie der Gattung Lotus. Bot. ]ahrb. Syst.
25: 166-232. Britton , N.L. & Rose, J.N. 0930). (Rosales). Krameriacae, Bullock, A.A. 0965). Nomenclatural notes: XVI. Bolusafra. Kew Bult. Campbell, G.]. 0998). A taxonomic revision of the genus Rafnia
Caesalpiniaceae. North American Flora 23(4-5): 196-349. New 19: 200. Tbunb . (Fabaceae, Crotalarieae). M.Sc. Thesis, Rand Afiikaans
BreckJe, S.-W. (2002). Walter's Vegetation of the Earth: the ecological York Botanical Garden. University, Johannesburg.
systems ofthe Geo-Biosphere. 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Pp. 527. Bunge, A. (1874). Species Generis Oxytropis DC. Mem . Acad. Imp
Britton, N.L. & Wilson, P. (1924). Scientific Survey ofPuerto Rico and Sci. St.-Petersbourg ser. 7, 22: 1-166. Campbell, G.J. & Van Wyk, B-E. (2001). A taxonomic revision of
Brenan, ].P.M. (1959). Leguminosae, Part 1: Mimosoideae. In C.E. the Virgin Islands 5: 426-427. Rafnia (Fabaceae, Crotalarieae). S. African]. Bot. 67: 90-147.
Hubbard & E. Milne-Redhead (eds.), Flom ofTropica/EastAfn'ca. Burbidge, N.T. 0965). The Australian species of Sesbania Scopoli
Crown Agents, London. Pp. 173. . Brouat, C., Gielly, L. & McKey, D. (2001). Phylogenetic rel:uion~hips (Leguminosae). Austral.]. Bot. 13: 103-141. Campbell-Young, G.J. & Balkwill, K. (2001). A new species of
in the genus Leonardoxa (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) Pearsonia (Fabaceae) from dolomites in Noithern Provmce, South
Brenan,].P.M. 0963). The species of Jsoberlinia. Kew Bull. 17: 219-226. Burkart, A. (1939a). Estudios sistematicos sobre las Leguminosas- Africa . Nordic]. Bot. 20: 547-555.
inferred from chloroplast trnL intron and trnL-trnF intergenic
spacer sequences. Amer.]. Bot. 88: 143--149. Hedisareas de la Republica Argentina y regiones adyacentes.
Brenan, ].P.M. 0966). The genus Entada, its subdivisions and a key Daiwiniana 3 (2): 117-302. Cardenas, L., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, H. & Vega, A.V. de (1986).
to the African species. Kew Bull. 20: 361-378. Browicz, K. 0963a). The genus Colutea. Monogr. Bot. 14: 1-136. Peltophorum venezuelense sp. nov. (Leguminosae-Caesalp1m-
Burkart, A. (1939b). Descripci6n de Mimozyganthus, nuevo genero oideae). Ernstia 41: 1-4.
Brenan, J.P.M. (1967). Leguminosae, Part 2: Caesalpinioideae. In E. Browicz, K. 0 963b). Oreophysa-an overlooked ge nu s of de Leguminosas y sinopsis pre liminar de los generos argentinos
Milne-Redhead & R.M. Polhill (eds.), Flora of Tropical East Afn'ca. Leguminosae. Kew Bull. 16: 493-495. de Mimos6ideas. Darwiniana 3(3): 445-456. Carter, A.M. (1974). The genus Cercidium (Leguminosae: Caesal-
Crown Agents, London. Pp. 230. pinioideae) in the Sonoran desert of Mexico and the United
Brown, ].H. & Lomolino, M.V. (1998). Biogeography, 2nd edition. Burkart, A. (1940). Nota sobre algunas Leguminosas indigenas o States. Proc. Calif Acad. Sci. 40(2): 17-57.
Brenan, ].P.M . (vol. ed.). (1970). Leguminosae-Mimosoideae. Jn A.W. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. Pp. 560. introducidas en Chile. Reuista Chilena Hist . Nat. 43: 156-164.
Exell, A. Fernandes & H. Wild (eds.), Flora Zambesiaca 3(1): Carvalho, A.M., de (1997). A synopsis of the genus Dalbergia
1-153. Crown Agents, London. Brummitt, R.K. 0968a). New and little known species from the Flora Burkart, A. (1944). Tres nuevas Leguminosas del Paraguay. (Fabaceae: Dalbergieae) in Brazil. Brittonia 49: 87-109.
Zambesiaca area. Bo/. Soc. Brat., ser. 2, 41: 219-393. Darwiniana 6: 478-482.
Brenan, ].P.M. 0980). A new species of Parkinsonia (Leguminosae) Ca ivalho, A.M. de & Barneby, R.C. 0993). The genus Zollernia
from Somalia. Kew Bull. 35: 563-565 Brummitt, R.K. 0968b). A new genus of the tribe Sophoreae Burkart, A. 0951). Apurimacia Harms, genera de Leguminosas nuevo (Fabaceae: Swartzieae) in Bahia, Brazil. Brittonia 45: 208-212.
(Leguminosae) from Western Africa and Borneo. Kew Bull. 22: para la Flora Argentina. Physis (Buenos Aires) 20 (52): 285-290.
Brenan, ].P.M. 0984). A new record and a new taxon in the genus 375-386. Carvalho-Okano, R.M. & Leitao Filho, H.F. 0985). Revi sao
Pseudoprosopis (Leguminosae) from Africa. Kew Bull. 39: Burkait, A. (1952). Las Leguminosas Argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. taxon6mica do genero Calpogonium Desv . (Leguminosae-
657-658. Brummitt, R.K. (1980). Reconsideration of the genera Ptycholobium, Edition 2. Acme Agency, Buenos Aires. Pp. 569. Lotoideae) no Brasil. Revista Brasil. Bot. 8: 31-45 .
Cau/ocarpus, Lupinophyllum and Requienia in relation to
Brenan, ].P.M. 0986). The genus Adenopodia (Leguminosae). Kew Burkart, A. (1957). Leguminosas nuevas o crfticas, V. Darwiniana Castro, S., Silveira, P., Coutinho, A.P. & Figueiredo, E. (2005). Systematic
Tephrosta (Leguminosae- Papilionoideae). Kew Bull. 35:
Bull. 41: 73-90. 469-472. 11(2): 256- 261. studies in Tylosema (Leguminosae). Bot.]. Linn. Soc. 147: 99-115.
Brenan, ].P.M. & Brununitt, R.K. 0965). The variation of Dichrostachys Burkart, A. (1964). Leguminosas nuevas o criticas, VI. Darwiniana Castroviejo, S. (1999). Apuntes sobre algunos Adenocarpus (Legum-
Brununitt, R.K. 0986). A taxonomic perspective of the genus Baikiaea.
cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn. Bo/. Soc. Brot. 39: 61-115. 13: 428-448. inosae) ibericos. Analesjard. Bot. Madrid 57: 37-46.
In G.D. Piearce (ed.), Proceedings of the First International
Bresser, M. 0978). Monograph of the genus Phylacium Conference on the Teak Forests of Southern /ifrica, Livingstone, Burka1t, A. (1967). Sinopsis del genero sudamericano de leguminosas Cavagnetto, C. & Anad6n P. 0996). Preliminary palynological data
(Leguminosae). Blumea 24: 485-493. Zambia, 18-24th March 1984: 61-73. The Forest Department, Aclesmia DC. Darwiniana 14: 463-568. on floristic and climatic changes during the Middle Eocene -
Zambia in cooperation with FINNIDA/VTI Tech., Ndola.
Breteler, F.J. 0960). Revision of Abrus Adanson (Papilionaceae) with Burkait, A. 0969). Leguminosas nuevas o criticas, 7. Darwiniana 15: Early Oligocene of the eastern Ebro Basin, northeast Spain. Rev.
special reference to Africa. Blumea 10: 607-624. Brum.mitt, R.K. & Powell, C.E. (eds.) 0992). Authors ofPlant Names 535-542. Palaeobot. Palynol. 92: 281-305.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Pp. 732.
Breteler, F.]. 0994a). The use of the subspecies concept in African Burkart, A. (1971). El genero Galactia (Legum.-Phaseoleae) en Centurion, T.R. de (1993). Caesalpinioideae A. P. de Candolle. In T.].
plant taxonomy with particular reference to Abrus (Leguminosae: Brummitt, R.K. & Ross, J.H . 0974). The African species of Sudamerica con especial referenda a la Argentina y a paises Killeen E. Garcia E. & S.G . Beck (eds.), Guia de arboles de
Papilionoideae). In J.H . Seyani & A.C. Chikuni (eds.), Proc. Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Kew Bull. 29: vecinos. Darwiniana 16: 663-796. Bolivia: pp. 395-419. Herbario Nacional de Bolivia, Missouri
13th plenary meeting AETFAT, Zomba, Malawi, 2-11 April, 415-424. Botanical Garden.
Burkart, A. (1976). A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae
1991. 1: 309-314 . National Herbarium and Botanic Gardens of Brummitt, R.K. & Ross, ].H. 0976). A reconsideration of the genus Chamberlain, JR. (ed.). (2001). Calliand1-a calothyrsus: an agroforesny
Malawi, Zomba . subfam. Mimosoideae). ]. Arnold Arbor. 57: 219-249, 450-547.
Adenolobus (Leguminosae-Caesalpinio id eae). Kew Bull. 31: tree for the humid tropics. Trap. Forest. Pap. 40. Pp. 101.
399-406. Burkart, A. & Carter, A. (1976). Notas en e l genero Cercidium
Breteler, F.J. 0994b). A revison of Leucomphalos, including Chandler, G.T., Bayer, R.J. & Crisp, M.D. (2001). A molecular
(Caesalpinioideae) en Sud America. Darwiniana 20: 305-311.
Baphiastrum and Bowringia (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Brummitt, R.K., Harder, D.K., Lewis, G.P., Lock, J.M. & Verdcourt, B. phylogeny of the endemic Australian genus Gastrolobiu.m
Wageningen Agric. Univ. Pap. 94,4: 1-41. (submitted). Tribes Swartzieae, Sophoreae, Dalbergieae, Abreae, Burkait, A. & Vilchez, 0. (1971) . Valoraci6n e ilustraci6n clel genero (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae) and allied genera using chloroplast and
Millettieae and Robinieae. In G.V. Pope & R.M. Polhill (eds.), Fiebrigiella Harms (Leguminosae-Heclysareae). Darwiniana 16: nuclear markers. Amer.]. Bot. 88: 1675-1687.
Breteler, F.J. (1995). The boundary betwee n Amherstieae and
Flora Zambesiaca 3(3). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 659-662.
Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). In M.D. Crisp & ].]. Doyle (eds.), Chandler, G.T., Crisp, M.D., Cayzer, L.W. & Bayer, R.]. (2002).
Advances in Legume Systematics 7, Phylogeny: 53-61. Royal Bruneau, A. 0996). Phylogenetic and biogeographical patterns in Burkart, A., Vilchez, 0. & Crisci, ]. (1972). Estu dio de Lotus Monograph of Gastrolobium (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae) . Austral.
Botanic Gardens, Kew. subpinnatus Lag. y L. wrangelianus F. et M., dos Le.guminosas Syst. Bot. 15: 619-739.
Erythrina (Leguminosae-Phaseoleae) as inferred from
morphological and chloroplast DNA characters. Syst. Bot. 21: vicarias del Oeste Norte y Sud-Americana. Darwimana 17:
Breteler, F.]. (1999). A revision of Prioria, including Gossweilero- Chaney, R. (1947). Tertiary ce ntres and migration routes. Ecol.
587-605. 458-466.
dendron, Kingiodendron, Oxystigma, and Pterygopodium Monogr. 17: 140-148.
(Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae-Detarieae) with emphasis on Bruneau, A. & Doyle, J.]. (1990). A chloroplast DNA inversion as a Burkill H.M. 0995). The useful plants of West Tropical Africa, vol.
Africa. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Pap. 99(3): 1-61. subtribal character in the Phaseoleae (Leguminosae). Syst. Bot. 15: 3, f~milies J-L. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Pp. 857. Chapp ill , J.A. (1995). Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: the
development of an explicit hypothesis. In M.D.Crisp & J.J.Doyle
Breteler, F.J., Ferguson, l.K., Gasson, P.E. & ter Welle, B.j.H. (1997). 378-386.
Burkill, I.H. 0935). A dictionary of the economic products of the (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 7, Phylogeny: 1-9. Royal
Colophospermum reduced to Hardwi ckia (Leguminosae: Brunea u, A., Doyle, ] .]. & Doyle, J.L. (1995). Phylogenetic Malay Peninsula . Vol. I, A-H: 1-1220; vol. n, I-Z: 1221-2402. Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Caesalpinioideae). Bull. Mus. natl. Hist. nat., B, Adansonia 19: relationships in Phaseoleae: evidence from chloroplast restriction London, Crown Agents.
279-291. Chappill, ].A. (2000). Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: strict
site characters: Jn M.D. Crisp & ].]. Doyle (eds.), Advances in Butcher, R. & Chappill, ].A. (2001). Sphaerolobium macranthum consensus of 240 trees (comp leted 11 June 2000).
Bridgewater, S.G.M. & Stirton, C.H. 0997). A morphological and Legume Systematics 7, Phylogeny: 309-330. Royal Botanic (Leguminosae : Mirbelieae) complex revised. Austral. Syst. Bot. 14:
Gardens, Kew. www.bo1:1ny.uwa.ech1.a11/sys\em:1rlcs/paps h1ml.
biogeographic study of the Acosmium dasycarpum complex 155-173.
516 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
BIBLIOGRAPHY 517
De Kort, I. & TI1ijssc, G. 0 984). A revision or /11dfgofera (Legurninosae-
losses of two genes and one intron from legume chlorop last Du Puy, D.j. , Labat, J.-N. & Schrire , B.D. (1995a). A revision of Endo, Y. & Ohash i, H. 0990). New distinctions between Alysicatpus
Papilionoideae) in southeast Asia. Bl11111ea 0: 89- 151. genomes. Syst. Bot. 20: 272-294. Phylloxylon (Leguminosae: Papi lionoicleae: Incligofereae). Kew vagina/is and A. ovalifolius (Leguminosae). Nat. Hist . Res., 1:
Delgado Salinas, A. & Johnston, M.C. 0984). A new species of Bull. 50: 477-494. 43-48.
Doyle, J.J., Doyle, ].L., Ballenger, JA. & Palmer, JD. (1996). The
Myrospermum (Leguminosae-Papilionoicleae) from northeastern
distribution and phylogenetic significance of a 'iO-Kb hloroplast Du Puy, D.J. , Phillipson, P.B. & Rabevohitra, R. (1995b). The genus Endo, Y. & Ohashi, H. 0997). Cladistic analysis o f phylogenetic
Mexico. Syst. Bot. 9: 356-358.
DNA inversion in the flowering plant family Lcgumi.nos:ie. Malec. Delonix (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioicleae: Caesalpinieae) in relationships among tribes Cicereae, Trifolieae, and Vicieae
Delgado ":t lin:1s, A. & L ·'Wi ·, G.P. 0997). Oryxis, a n w genus in tribe Phylogen. Eva/. 5: 429-438. Madagascar. Kew Bull. 50(3): 445-475 . (Leguminosae). Amer.]. Bot. 84: 523-529 .
Phascoleae (Leguminosae: Papilionoicleae) from Ur:1;;il. Kew Bull.
52: 221-225. Doyle, J.J .. Doyle, j.L. Uallenger, ) .A., Di kson, E.E., K:tfit:t , T. & Du Puy, D.j ., Labat, J.-N., Rabevohitra, R., Villiers, J.-F., Bosser,]. & Enrech, N .X. de, & Agostini, G . (1987). Platymiscium Vogel
O lrnshi , Fl. (1997). A phylogeny of the chloroplast gene rbcl in Moat,]. (2002). The Leguminosae ofMadagascar. Royal Botanic (Leguminosae: Faboicleae, Dalbergieae) en Venezuela. Acta Bot.
Delgado Salinas, A., Brnneau, A. & Doyle, ].]. (1993). Ch loroplast the teguminosac: taxonoml correlations and in ' ighrs inro the Gardens, Kew. Pp. 737. Venez. 15(2): 99-131.
DNA phylogenetic studies in New World Phaseolinae vo lution of nodularion. 1l111e1; }. Bot. 8 : 5 l - 55 .
Duvigneaud, P. (1954). Le genre "Geissaspis'' clans le Congo meridional Enrech, N.X. de, & Gil, C. 0993). Complemento a la revisi6n
(Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseoleae). Syst. Bot. 18: 6-17. taxonomica clel genera Pterocarpus )acq. en Venezuela (Fabaceae:
Doyle, ].]., Chappill, ].A., Bailey, C.D. & Kajita , T. (2000). Towards et les pays limitrophes. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique 86: 145 - 205.
Delgado Salinas, A., Turley, T., Richman, A. & Lavin, M. (1999). a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence from rhcL Dalbergieae). Acta Bot. Venez. 16(2-4): 93-103.
Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of sequences and non-molecular data . In P.S. Herendeen & A. Duvigneaud, P. & Brenan, j.P.M. (1966). The genus Cryptosepalum
Benrh. (Leguminosae) in the areas of the Flora of Tropical East Enrech, N.X. de, Arroyo, M.T.K & Langenheim,]. (1983). Sistematica
Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot. 24: 438-460. Bruneau eel .), Advances in Legume Systematics 9: 1-20. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew. Africa and Flora Zambesiaca. Kew Bull. 20: 1-23. clel genera Copaifera L. (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae ,
Dem!, I. 0972). Re vl ion der Sektionen Acc111tbophace Bunge uncl Detarieae) en Venezuela. Acta Bot. Venez. 14(2): 239-290.
Aegacantha Uunge cler Gatttmg Astmgalus L. Bol5s/em 21: Do}•le, J.J., D yle, j.L. · Harhison, . (2003). hloropl:1sc-expressed Dwyer, J.D. (1951). The Central American, West Indian, and South
American species of Copaifera (Caesalpiniaceae). Brittonia 7: Em, H . (1980). Pseudovignapuerarioides, eine neue Leguminose aus
1-235. glutnmine synthetase in Glyc f11e and rc:lated Legumino sae :
West-Afrika. Willdenowia 10: 151-155.
phylogeny, g •ned11pli :mlon and :mcient polyp loidy. ~·s1. Bot. 143-172.
De Winter, B. 0971). Floristic relationships between the nonhern and 28: 567- 577.
Dwyer, J.D. (1954). The tropical American genus Tachigalia Aublet Esterhuyse, CJ. 0993). Tree of the year: Schotia brachypetala Sood .
southern arid areas of Africa. Mitt. Bot. Staatsamml. Munchen 10: Pamphlet 430. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South
424-437. Drewes, S.T. 0997). El genera Macroptilium (Fabaceae) en la Flora (Caesalpiniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 41: 223-260.
Argentina. Bot. Soc. Argent. Bot. 32: 195-216. Africa.
De Wit, H.C.D. 0949). Revision of the genus Sindora Miquel Dwyer, J.D . Cl957a). The tropical American genus Scierolobium
Vogel (Caesalpiniaceae). Lloydia 20(2); 67-118. Esterhuyse, C.J. 0994). Tree of the year 1994: Bolusanthus speciosus
(Legum.). Bull.Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, Ser. 3, 18: 5-82. Ducke, A. (1922). Cedrelinga cateniformis (Ducke) Ducke. Arch.
Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 3: 70-71. (H. Bo!.) Harms. Pamphlet 432. Department of Water Affairs and
De Wit, H .C.D. 0956). A revision of Malaysian Bauhinieae. Dwyer,J.D. Cl957b). Androcalymma, a new genus of the uibe Cassieae Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa .
Reinwardtia 3(4): 381-539. Ducke, A. 0934a). Les genres Coumarouna Aubl. et Tara/ea Aubl. (Caesalpiniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 44: 295-297.
Rev. Bot, Appl. Agric. Trop . 14: 400-407. Evans, S.V., Fellows, L.E. & Bell. E.A. (1985). Distribution and
Dickison, W.C. (1981). The evolutionary relationships of the Dwyer, J.D. (1958) , The New World species of Cynometra. Ann. syste matic significance of basic non-prote in amino-acids and
Leguminosae. In R.M , Polhill & P.H. Raven (eels.), Advances in Ducke, A. ( 19341>) . !?1.>cord .\y /011: a new genus of Leguminosae- Missouri Bot. Gard. 45: 313 - 345. amines in the Tephrosieae . Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 13: 271-302.
Legume Systematics 1: 35-54. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Caesalpini id~ae . Trap. \~locis 39: 16-18.
Dwyer, j.D . & collaborators (1980). Leguminosae subfamily Everist, S.L. (1981). Poisonous plants of Australia. Angus & Robertson,
Diez, M.]. & Ferguson, I.K. 0990-1996). Studies of the pollen Ducke, A. 0939). As especies brasileiras do genera Ormosia Jacks. Papilionoicleae (conclusion) . In R.E. Woodson, R.E. Schery & Sydney. Pp. 966.
morphology and taxonomy of the tribes Loteae and Coroni lleae Ann. Acad. Brasil. Sci. 11 (3): 179-193. coll aborators (eels.), Flora of Panama, Part 5, Pase. 5. Ann.
MiSSOUl'i Bot. Gard. 67: 523-818. Exell, A.W. (1960). History of Bota nica l colle cting in the Flora
(Leguminosae: Papilionoicleae). Part 1. 0990). Lagasca//e1 16 0): Zambesiaca area: 1. 18th Century Collectors: 23-24. In A.W.
Ducke, A. 0940). Revision of the species of the genus Coumarouna
77-94. Part 2. 0994). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 81 : 233~255. Part Aubl. orDipteryxSchreb. Trap. Woods6l : 1-10. Dy Phon, P. (1987a). Uraria. In P.H. Morat (ed.), Flore <lu Cambodge Exel! & H. Wild (eds.), Flora Zambesiaca 1(1). Flora Zambesiaca
3. 0996), Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 94: 239-257. du Laos et du Vietnam. Legumineuses-Papiliono·idec . 23: 95-116. Managing Committee. Pp. 336.
Ducke, A. (1949). Notas sobre a Flora Neotr6 pi 11- II: as Leguminosas Museum National cl'Histoire Naturelle Laboratoire du
Dillon, M.O. (19 0). Myr<1.'l:y/011. Ln J.D. Dwyer a nd c:ollnborntors Fagg, C.W. & Allison, G.E. (2004). Acacia senegal and the gum
da Amazonia Brasileira. Bal. Teen. Inst. 1lg ro11 . N. 18: 1-248. Phanerogamie, Paris.
eels). Flora of P:inama , part V, fascicle . Family 83. l.eguminos.1e Arabic trade. Trop . Forest. Pap 42. Pp. 261.
subfamily P:ipilionoideae. Aw1. lvlfsso11rl 801. Card. 67: 73~ - 736. Ducke, A. 0 950). Plantas novas ou pouco conheciclas cla Amazonia. Dy Phon, P. (1987b). Christia. In P.H. Marat (ed.), Flore du
Bot. Teen . Inst. Agron. N. 18: 10-13. Cambodge du Laos et du Vietnam . Legumineuses-Papiliono'iclees. Fantz, P.R. (1977). A monograph of the genus Clitoria (Leguminosae-
Diniz, T.E. , Rivas-Martinez, S., & Fern:'inclez-Gonzalez, F. (1990).
23: 117-125. Museum National cl'Histoire Narurelle Laboratoire du Glycineae). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida. Pp. 1066.
Stauracanthus Link (Leguminosae) en la Peninsula Iberica. !tin. Ducke, A. 0958). Notas adicionais as Leguminosas cla Amazonia
Ceobot. 3: 131 - 135. Brasileira. Bot. Teen. Inst. Agron , N. 36: 45-75. Phanerogamie, Paris. Fantz, P.R. 0996). Resegregation of Barbiera from Clitoria
Dy Phan, P., Ohashi, H. & Vidal, J.E. (1994). In P.H. Marat (eel.), Flore (Leguminosae-Phaseoleae-Clitoriinae) . Sida 17: 55-68.
Dixon, DJ (1997). A taxonomic revision of the genus Austrosteenisia Dufour, D.I.. & Z:mrcchi, j.L. (1979). Mo11opte1y.x angustifolia and
R.Geesink. (Fabaceae-Millettieae). Austrobaileya 5: 71-78. du Cambodge du Laos et du Vietnam . Leguminosae (Fabaceae), Fantz, P.R. & Precleep, S.V. (2000) . Clitoria (Leguminosae) of South
Erisnw }t1p111·a : their us e by indige nou s people in the
Northwc te rn Amnion. Bot. Mus. leajl. 7: 69 - 91. Papilionoicleae, Desmoclieae. 27: 3-154. Museum Nation al Eastern Asia. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 37 (1-4): 1-37.
Dominguez, E. 0976). Revision de las especies anuales del genera cl'Histoire Naturelle Laboratoire du Phanerogamie, Paris.
Hippocrepis L. Lagascalia 5: 225-261. Duke, J .A. 0981). Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Fariclah Hanum, I. (2001). A systematic study of the Ormosia group
Importance. Plenum Press, New York & London. Pp. 345. Ebinger, J.E., Siegler, D.S. & Clarke , H.D. (2000). Taxonomic revision (Leguminosae: Papilionoicleae). In LG. Saw, L.S.L. Chua & K.C.
Doming uez, E. & Ga li ano , E.F. 0979) . Revision clel genera of South American species of the genus Acacia subgenus Acacia Khoo (eds.), Taxonomy: the cornerstone of biodiversity. Proc. 4•h
·rem:1go11olobus Scop. (Fabaceae). Lagascalia 8: 189-214. Duley, M.L. & Vincent, M.A . ( 2003). A synopsis of the genus (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Syst. Bot. 25: 588-617. Intl. Flora Malesiana Symposium 1998, pp . 107-121. Forest
Cladrastis (Leguminosae). Rbodoro 105: 205-239.
Dormer, K.]. 0945). An investigation of the taxonomic va lue of Edwards, T.J. 0994). A Revision of Argyrolobiwn (Crotalarieae) in Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
shoot structure in angiosperms with espec ia l reference to Dumaz-le-Grancl,]. 0952). Contribution a l'e tude des L •gumincuses South Aji·ica. Ph.D. Thesis, Unive rsity of Natal, Pietermaritzburg. Farr, E.R . & Zijlstra, G. (eds.). Index Nominum Genericorum.
Leguminosae. Ann. Bot., n.s. 9: 141 - 153. de Madagascar. IV. Les ge nr s Xttnthocercis Baill. el J>seudocadia Pp. 255. http·//rn ys: nel ,si.cdu/ bmaovLlng/im;Porm.cfm
Harms. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 99: 113-115.
Doyle, ].]. 0995). DNA data and legume phylogeny: a progress Eggleton, P. & Vane-Wright, R.I. (eels.). (1994). Phylogenetics and Fearing, O .S. 0959). A cytotaxonomic study of the genus Cologania
report. In M.D, rlsp & ].]. Doyle (eels.), Advances in Legume Dumorrier, 0.-C. 0829). Analyse des Families des Plantes, pp. 1-104. ecology, pp. 376. Academic Press, London. and its relationship to Amphicarpaea (Leguminosae-
Systemtt//cs 7, f'/Jytoseny: 11-30. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Tournay, J Casterman.
Elias, T.S. (1981a). Parkieae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H. Raven (eds.), Papilionoicleae). Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Doyle,].]. & Doyle, ].L. 0993). Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Dunn, S.T. 0910). Leptoderris, a new genus of Leguminosae. Bull. Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 153. Royal Botanic Gardens, Fecltschenko, B.A. (1902). The genus Hedysarum. Trudy Imp. S.-
papilionoid legume tribe Phaseoleae. Syst. Bot. 18: 309-327. Misc . lnfonn., Kew 1910: 386 -391. Kew. Petersburgsk. Bot. Sada 19: 185 - 375.
Doyle, JJ & Doyle, ].L. (2000). Nuclear protein-coding genes in Dunn, S.T. (1911). Ost1yocatpus and a new allied genus Ost1yoderris. Elias, T.S. (198lb). Mimozygantheae. In RM. Polhill & P.H. Raven Ferguson, I.K. & Banks, H. 0995). Pollen morphology of the
phylogeny reconstruction and homology a se sme nt: some Bull. Misc. Inform., Kew 1911: 362-364. (eels.), Advances in Legume Systematics l: 154. Royal Botanic Cynometra group (Detarieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae) in
examples from Leguminosae. In P.M. Hollingsworth, R.M. Gardens, Kew.
Dunn, S.T. 0912). A revision of the genus Millettia Wight & Arn.]. Afri ca . Second Symposium of African palynology, Tevuren
Bateman & R.J. Gornall. (eds.), Molecular Systematics and Plant
Linn. Soc., Bot. 41: 123-243. Elliot, W.R. &Jones, D.L. (1980-1997). Encyclopaedia of Australian (Belgium) , pp. 217-227. Occas. C!FEG, 1995/ 31, Orleans.
Evolution, pp. 229-254. Systematics Association Special Volume
series 57. Taylor and Francis, Basingstoke. Plants. Vols. 1-7. Lothian Publishing co., Melbourne. Ferguson, I.K. & Pearce, K.J . 0986). Observations on the pollen
Du Puy, DJ. .,. Lnhat, J.· . 0995). Pyranthus, a new genus of the
tribe Millettieae Lcguminosae-Papilionoideae) from Madagascar. Elmer, A.D.E. (1907). Some new Leguminosae. Leajl. Philipp. Bot. 1: morphology of the genus Bauhinia L. (Legumin osae:
Doyle, J.J. & Luckc1w, I.A, (2003). The rest of the Iceberg. Legume
Kew Bull. 0: 73- 8 . 220-221. Caesalpinioicleae) in the neotropics . lo S. Blackmore & l.K.
Div •rsity :tnd Evoll!tion in a Phylogenetic Context. Plant Physiol.
131: 900- 910. Ferguson (eels.), Pollen and Spores: Form and function , pp.
Du Puy, O,J., Labat, J.-N. & Schrire, B.D. (1994). Revision du genre Encllicher, S.L. (1840). Swartzieae. Genera plantarum secundum 283-296. Symp. Linn. Soc., Acacl. Press, London and New York.
Doyle,].]., Doyle, J.L. & Palmer, JD. (1995). Multiple independent \tm1s bania S.Moor · (Leguminosae). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, ordines naturales disposita. Wien. Pp. 1321-1323.
1ldt111so11ia 16, 1: 75- 102.
Polhill, R.M. Cl981r). Euchresteae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H. Raven (eds.), Quattrocchi, U. (2000). World Dictionary of Plant Names. Common Reyne!, C. & Pennington, T.D. (1997). El genera Inga en el Peru, Rojo , J .P. (1982) . Studies in the genus Dialium (Cassieae-
Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 402. Royal Botanic Gardens, names, scientijlc names, eponyms, synonyms and etymology. Vol. morfologia, distribuci6n y usos. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Caesalpinioideae) Thesis (unpublished), University of Oxford.
Kew. I, A-C: 1-714, vol. II, D-L: 715-1572, vol. Ill, M-Q: 1573- 2260, Pp. 228. Pp. 282 .
vol. IV, R-Z: 2261-2896. CRC Press. Roskov, Yu .R. (1990a). Revision of the genus Trifolium in Flora of the
Polhill, R.M. (1982). Crotalaria in Africa and Madagascar. A.A. Reynolds, S.T. 0990). Aeschynomeneae (Benth.) Hutch .
Balkema , Rotterdam. Pp. 389. Queiroz , L.P. de 0991) . 0 genera Cratylia Mart . ex Benth . (Leguminosae) in Australia. Austrobaileya 3: 177- 202. USSR. Canel. Thesis. Komarov Botanical Institute, Leningrad. (In
(Leguminosae: Pa.pilionoideae: Phaseoleae) - revisao Russian).
Polhill, R.M. (1990). Legumineuses. In]. Bosser, Th. Cadet, ]. Gueho Reynolds, S.T. & Holland, A.E. (1989). The genus Zornia].F. Gmel.
taxonomica e aspectos biol6gicos. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidade (Leguminosae) in Australia . Austrobaileya 3: 13-38. Roskov, Yu.R. (1990b). The new species and new nomenclatural
& W. Marais (eds.), Flore des Mascareignes: La Reunion , Maurice,
Estadual de Campinas. combinations in the genera Lupinaster, Cbrysaspis, Trifolium
Rodrigues. 80: 1- 235. Mauritius, Sugar Indust1y Research Institute;
Richardson, J.E., Pennington, RT., Pennington, T.D. & Hollingsworth, and Amoria (Fabaceae). Bot. Zburn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 75:
Paris, ORSTOM; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew . Qu eiroz, L.P. de 0999) . Sistematica e Filogenia do genera P.M. (2001). Recent and rapid diversification of a species-rich
Camptosema Wj.Hook. & Arn. (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: 715-720.
Polhill, R.M. (1994). Classification of the Leguminosae & Complete gen us of Neotropical trees. Science 293: 2242-2245.
Phaseoleae). Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de Sao Paulo. Ross,]. H. (1974) . The genus Elephantorrbiza. Botbalia 11: 247-257.
synopsis of legume genera. In FA.Bisby, ]. Buckingham & J.B.
Ricker, M., Daly, D.C., Veen, G., Robbins, E.F., Sinta, V.M., Chota, IJ.,
Harborne (eels.), Phytochemical Dictionary of tbe Leguminosae. Queiroz, L.P. de, Lewis, G.P. & Allkin R. (1999). A revision of the Ross, J.H. (ed.) (1975). Mimosoideae. Flora ofSouthern Africa 16 (1).
Czygan, F.C. & Kinghorn, A.O. (1999). Distribution of quinolizidine
Vol. 1: Plants and their constituents, pp. xxxv-lvii. Chapman & genus Moldenhawera Schrad. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Pretoria, Botanical Research Institute. Pp . 159.
a lka lo id types in nine Ormosia species (Leguminosae-
Hall, London. Kew Bull. 54: 817-852.
Papilionoideae) Papilonoideae). Brittonia 51(1): 34-43.
Ross, J.H. (ed.) (1977). Caesalpinioideae. Flora of Southern Africa 16
Polhill, R. 0997) . Introduction to the Leguminosae: Legumes in Queiroz, L.P. de, Fortunato, R.H. & Giuletti, A.M. (2003) . Phylogeny (2). Pretoria, Botanical Research Institute. Pp. 142.
Rico Arce, M. de L. 0991). New species, combinations and synonyms
streets and gardens. Curtis's Bot. Mag. 14(4): 176-183. of the Diocleinae (Papilionoideae: Phaseoleae) based on
for Zygia, Cojoba, Marmaroxylon a nd Pithecellobium
morphological characters. In B.B.Klitgaard & A.Bruneau (eds.), Ross, ].H. (1979). A conspectus of the African Acacia species. Mem .
Polhill, R.M. & Raven, P.H. (eds.) (1981). Advances in Legume (Leguminosae-Mimosoideae, lngeae). Kew Bull. 46: 493-521.
Advances in Legume Systematics 10: Higher Level Systematics: Bot. Surv. South Africa 44: 1-155.
Systematics 1: 1-425 & 2: 427-1049. Royal Botanic Gardens,
303-324. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Rico Arce, M. de L. (1999). New combinations in Mimosaceae. Novon
Kew. Ross, J.H . (1980) . A new species of Templetonia (Papilionaceae)
9: 554-556. from Western Australia . Muelleria 4: 247-249.
Quesada , FJ.Q., Madrigal, Q.J., Villalobos, N.Z., Fernandez, R.A. &
Polhill, R.M. & Sousa, M. (1981), Robinieae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H.
Ramirez, ).G. (1997). Arbo/es de la Peninsula de Osa. INBio, Rico Arce, L. (2003). Geographical patterns in neotropical Acacia
Raven (eels.), Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 283-288. Royal Ross , J .H. (1982) . A revisi o n of the genus Templetonia R.Br.
Costa Rica. Pp. 412 . (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Austral. Syst. Bot. 16: 41-48.
Botanic Gardens, Kew. (Pap ilionaceae). Muelleria 5: 1-29.
Quezel, P. (1978). Analysis of the Flora of Mediterranean and Saharan Rico Arce, M. de L., Sousa S., M. & Fuentes S., S. (1999, pub!. 2000).
Polhill, R.M. & Vidal, J.E. (1981). Caesalpinieae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H. Ross , J .H. (1983). A revision of th e genus Platy/obium Sm.
Africa. Arm. Missouri Bot. Gard. 65: 479-534. Guinetia: a new genus in the tribe Ingeae (Leguminosae:
Raven (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 81-95. Royal (Papilionaceae). Muelleria 5: 127-141.
Mimosoideae) from Mexico. Kew Bull. 54: 975-981.
Botanic Gardens, Kew. Quinones, L.M. 0995). Dos especies nuevas del genera Brown.ea
Ross, J.H. (1985). A revision of the genus Labichea Gaudich. ex DC.
(Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Caldasia 18(86): 17-21. Ridder-Numan , J.W.A. (1992). Spa th olobus (Legu mino sae-
Polhill, R.M., Raven, P.H. & Stirton, C.H. (1981). Evolution and (Caesalpiniaceae). Muelleria 6: 23-49.
Papilionoideae): a new species and some taxonomic notes.
systematics of the Leguminosae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H. Raven Quinones, L.M. 0997). Una especie nueva de! genera Brownea
Blumea 37: 63-71. Ross, j.H. (1991). Bossiaea arenicola (Fabaceae), a new species
(eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 1-26. Royal Botanic (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). RevistaAcad. Colomb. Ci. Exact.
from northern Queensland. Muel/eria 7: 371-374.
Gardens, Kew. 21(80): 225- 227. Ridder-Numan, J.W.A. (1996). Historical biogeography of the
southeast Asian genus Spatholobus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) Ross, J .H. (1992). A note on Plagiocarpus Benth. (Fabaceae:
Pope, G.V., Polhill, R.M. & Martins, E.S. (eds.) (2003) . Flora Radcliffe-Smith, A. 0998). Three-language list of botanical name
and its allies. Blumea Suppl. 10: 1-144. Brongniartieae). Muelleria 7: 421-423.
Zambesiaca. 3, part 7. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Pp. 274. components. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Pp. 143.
Ridder-Numan, J.W.A. & Kornet, D.]. (1994). A revision of the genus Ross, J.H. (1994a). Notes on Western Australian Bossiaea species
Porter, C.L. 0956). The genus Peteria (Leguminosae). Rbodora 58: Ramirez, N. (1995) . Revision taxon6mica del genera Alexa Moq.
Kunstleria (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Blumea 38: 465-485. (Fabaceae): 1. Muelleria 8: 201-209.
344-355. (Fabaceae, Sophoreae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 549-569.
Bl BLIOGRAPHY 535
534 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Santos-Guerra, A. & Lew is, G.P. (1986). A new species of Cicer Schulz, O .E. (1901). Monographie der gattung Melilotus. Bot.j ahrb.
Ross, J.H. 0994b). Notes on Western Australian Bossiaea species Rudd, V.E. (1975). Nissolia chiapen.sis, a new species of Leguminosae
(Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) from the Canary Islands. Kew Bull. Syst. 29: 660- 735.
(Fabaceae): 2. Mueller/a 8: 211 - 221. from Mexico. Phytologia 31: 427-430.
41: 459-462. Schultze-Kraft, R. & Clements, R.]. (eds.) 0990). Centrosema. Biology,
Ross, J.H. 0997). Notes on Goodia (Fabaceae, Bossiaeeae). Mueller/a Rudd, V.E. (1977). The genus Machaerium (Leguminosae) in Mexico,
Sartori, A.L.B. & Azevedo Tozzi, A.M.G . de (2001). Myrocaipus Agronomy and Utilization. CIAT Publication No. 92 .
10: 1-11. Bo/. Soc. Bot. Mexico 37: 119-146.
emarginatus Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Sophoreae), a new Pp. 668.
Ross, J.H. 0998a). Erythrophleum. In A.E. Orchard (ed.), Flora of Rudd, V.E. 0981). Aeschynomeneae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H. Raven species from Bolivia. Novon 11: 353-355. Schulze-Menz, G.K. (1964) . Leguminosae. In H . Melchior (ed.),
Australia, Vol. 12: Mimosaceae (excl. Acacia), Caesalpiniaceae, (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 347- 354. Royal Botanic
Sartori, A.L.B. & Azevedo Tozzi, A.M.G. de (2002). Comparative Eng ler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 12, Vol. 2, pp.
pp. 70-72. CSJRO, Melbourne. Gardens, Kew.
leaflet anatomy in Myrocarpus Allemao, Myroxy/on L.f. and 221-242 . Borntraeger, Berlin.
Ross, ].H. Cl998b). Storckiella. In A.E. O rcha rd (ed .), Flora of Rudd, V.E. 0987a). Studies in Machae1·ium (Leguminosae) V. Myrospermum Jacq. (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae-Sopho reae) Schu tte, A.L. 0995). A taxonomic study of the tribes Podalyrieae
Australia, Vol. 12: Mimosaceae (excl. Acacia), Caesalpiniaceae, Phytologia 62: 277-281. species. Bot.]. Linn. Soc. 140: 249-259. and Liparieae (Fabaceae). Ph.D . thesis, Rand Afrikaans
pp. 73-75. CSIRO, Melbourne.
Rudd , V.E. (1987b) . Studies in Machaerium (Leguminosae) VJ. Sauer, J. 0964). Revision of Canavalia . Brittonia 16: 106-181. University, Johannesburg.
Ross, ].H. Cl998c). Labichea. In A.E. Orchard (ed.), Flora ofAustralia, Phytologia 62: 282-302.
Savin, S.M. (1977). The histo1y of the Earth's surface temperature Schutte, A.L. 0997a). Systematics of the genus Cyclopia Vent.
Vol. 12: Mimosaceae (excl. Acacia), Caesa lpiniaceae, pp .
Rudd, V.E. 0987c). Studies in Machaerium (Leguminosae) VII . during the past 100 million years . Ann . Rev. Ea1th Planet. Sci. 5: (Fabaceae, Podalyrieae). Edi11burgh]. Bot. 54: 125-170.
146-157. CSIRO, Melbourne.
Section II Lineata. Part I. Species with wingless fru it. Phytologia 319-355 . Schutte, A.L. (1997b). A revision of the genus Xiphotheca (Fabaceae).
Ross, J.H. Cl998d). Petalostylis. In A.E. O rchard (ed .), Flora of 64: 1-12.
Schatz, G.E. 0996). Malagasy/lndo-Australo-Malesian phytogeographic Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 90-102.
Australia, Vol. 12: Mimosaceae (excl. Acacia), Caesalpiniaceae,
pp. 157-160. CSIRO, Melbourne. Rudd, V.E. (1991). Nissoliagentryi (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae), a connections. In W.R. Lou ren<;o (ed.), Biogeographie de Madagascar, Schutte , A.L. (1997c). Systematics of the genus Liparia. Nordic].
new species from Sonora and Sinaloa, Mexico. Acta Bot. Mex. 15: pp. 73-83. l'Orstom , Paris. Bot. 17: 11-37.
Ross, ].H. (1998e). Notes on Western Australian Bossiaea species 23-27.
(Fabaceae): 3. Muelle1·ia 11: 5-11. Schindle r, A.K. (1926) . Desmodii gene rumqu e affinium species Sch utte, A.L. (1998) . A re-evaluation of the generic status of
Runde!, P.W. 0989). Ecological success in relation to plant form et comb inationes novae. II. Reper/. Spec. Nov Regni Veg. 22: Amphitha/ea and Coelidium (Fabaceae). Taxon 47: 55- 65.
Ross, ].H. (200la). Two endemic Australian genera in the tribe and function in the woody legumes In C.H. Stirton & J.L. 250-288.
Brongnia1tieae (Fabaceae) to accommodate two species forma lly Zarucchi (eds.), Advances in Legume Biology. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Schutte, A.L. & Van Wyk, B.-E. 0988). A synopsis of the genus
included in Templeton/a R.Br. Muelleria 15: 7-14. Missouri Bot. Gard. 29: 377 - 398. Schindler, A.K. (1928). Die Desmodiinen in der botanischen Literatur Dichilus (Fabaceae-Crotalarieae). S. African]. Bot. 54: 182-186.
nach Linne. Reper!. Spec. Nov. Regn.i Veg . Beih. 49: 1-371 .
Ross, ].H. (200lb). The identity of Bossiaea strigillosa Benth. Rutherford, M.C. & Westfall, R.H. (1986). Biomes of southern Africa Schutte, A.L. & Van Wyk , B.-E. (1990). Taxonomic rel:11ionships in the
(Fabaceae: tribe Bossiaeeae). Muelleria 15: 31-32. - an objective categoriza tiorL Mem . Bot. Suro. S. Africa 54: 1-98. Schmidt, B. (1978). Secul'igera securidaca (L.) Degen & ocrflcr- genus Dichilus (Fabaceae-Croralarieae) . S. 11.frican]. Bot. 56:
eine Species der Gatl:lmg Coronil/a L. Feddes Repert. 89: 597-6o0. 244-256.
Ross, ].H. & Hyland, B.P.M. 0983). Storckiella australien.sis sp. nov. Rydberg, P.A. (19 19). Fabaceae tribe Psoraleeae. North American
(Caesalpin iaceae) from Northern Queensland. Muelleria 5: Flora 24: 1- 64 (excluding pp. 34-40). The New York Botanical Sc hmidt , B. (1979). Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Sippenstru ctur der Schutte, A.L. & Van Wyk, B.-E. (1998a). Evolutiona1y relationships in
215 -217. Garden. Gattung Coronilla L. FeddesRepert. 90: 257-361. the Podalyrieae and Liparieae (Fabaceae) based on morphological,
Schmitz, A. (1977). Nouvelle contribution a la taxonom ie des cytological, and chemical evidence. Pl. Syst. Evol. 209: 1- 31.
Rudd, V.E. (1954). Centrolobium (Legum inosae). Validation of a Rydberg, P.A . 0923). Brongniartia. North American Flora 24:
specific name and a brief review of the genus. ]. Wash . A cad. Sci. 186-197. The New York Botanical Garden. Bau hinieae (Caesalpiniaceae). Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 1100-2): Schutte, A.L. & Van Wyk, B.-E. (1998b) . The tribal position of
44(99): 284-288. 12-16. Hypocalyptus Thunberg (Fabaceae). Novon 8: 178-182.
Rydberg, P.A. (1924). Galegeae (pars). No1th Ame1·ican Flora 24(4):
Rudd, V.E. 0955). The American species of Aeschynomene L. Contr. 235-237. The New York Botanical Ga rden. Schnabel, A. & Wendel, J.F. (1998). Cladis tic biogeography of Schutte, A.L., Vlok, ].H.J. & Van Wyk, B.-E. (1995). Fire-sutvival
U.S. Natl. Herb. 32(1): 1-172. Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ndhF and rp/16 chloroplast strategy-a character of taxonomic, ecological and evolutionary
St. John, H. (1970). Revision of the Hawaiian species of Canavalia gene sequences. Am.er.]. Bot. 85: 1753 - 1765. importance in fynbos legumes. Pl. Syst. Evol. 195: 243-259 .
Rudd, V.E. 0956). A revision of the genus Nissolia. Contr. U.S. Natl. (Leguminosae). Hawaiian Plant Studies 32. Israel j. Bot. 19:
Herb. 32(2): 173-206. 161-219. Schnabel, A. , McDonel, P.E. & Wendel, J.F. (2003). Phylogenetic Scotese, C.R. (2001). Atlas ofEarth History, Volume 1, Paleogeography,
relationships in Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ITS sequences. PALEOMAP Project, Arlington, Texas, pp 52. PALEOMAP website
Rudd, V.E. 0958). A revision of the genus Chaetoca/yx. Contr. U. S, Sakai, M., Kanazawa, A., Fuj ii, A., Thseng, F.S., Abe,]. & Shimamoto, Amer.]. Bot. 90: 310-320. ( hup;//www scotese.com).
Natl. Herb. 32(3): 207-245. Y. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships of the chloroplast genomes
in the genus Glycine inferred from four intergenic space r Schot, A.M. (1991) . Phylogenetic re lations and hi storica l Seferova, l.V. 0995). Konspekt sistemy rocla Cicer(Fabacaeae). (The
Rudd, V.E. (1963). The genus Dussia (Legumi nosae). Contr. U.S. biogeography of Fordia and lmbralyx (Papilionaceae: Millettieae).
sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 239 Cl-2): 29-54. synopsis of the system of genus Cicer (Fabaceae)). Bot. Zhurn.
Natl. Herb . 32: 247-277. Blumea 36: 205 - 234. (Moscow & Leningrad) 80: 96-104.
Sanchir, Ch. (1999). System of the genus Caragana Lam. (Fabaceae).
Rudd, V.E. (1965). The American species of Ormosia (Leguminosae). Schot, A.M. (1994). A revision of Ca llerya En d!. (in c luding
Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Neimenggu 30(4): 501 - 512. Silsbury, J.H. & Brittan, N.H. 0955). Distribution and ecology of the
Contr. U.S Natl. Herb. 32: 278-384. Padbruggea and Whitfordiodendron) (Papilionaceae: Millettieae). genus Kennedya Vent. in Western Australia. Austral.]. Bot. 3:
Sanchir, Ch. (Sanczir, Cz.) (2000). Systema generis Caragana Lam. Blumea 39: 1- 40.
Rudd, V.E. (1967). Oxyrhynchus and Monoplegma (Leguminosae). 113-135.
(Fabaceae). Novosti Sist Vyssh. Rast. 32: 76-90. (Jn Russian).
Phytologia 15: 289-294. Schrire, B.D. (1992). New combinations and resurrected names in Silva, M.F. da (1976). Revisao raxon6mica do genera Peltogyne
Sanderson, M.J. & Liston, A. (1995) . Molecular phylogenetic Microcharis an d l ndigastrum (Fabaceae-Pap ilion oideae) . (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Acta Amazon. 6(1) Suppl.: 1- 61.
Rudd, V.E. Cl968a) . A resume of Ateleia and Cyathostegia
systematics of Galegeae, wi th special reference to Astragalus. Jn Bothalia 22: 165 -170.
(Leguminosae). Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 32 (4): 385-410.
M.D. Crisp & ].]. Doyle (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics Silva, M.F. da (1986). Dimo1phandra (Caesalpiniaceae). Fl. Neo trop.
Rudd, V.E. (1968b) . Leguminosae of Mexico - Faboideae. I. 7, Phylogeny: 331-350. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Schrire, B.D. 0995) . Evolution of the tribe Incligofereae Monogr. 44: 1-128.
Sophoreae and Podalyrieae. Rhodora 70: 492-532. (L.cgumin< sae-Papili noidea ). In M.D. Crisp &J.J. Doyle (eds.),
Sanderson, M.J. & Wojciechowski, M.F. 0996). Diversification rates Adva11ces 111 J,eg11111e SJ ·tc:matlcs 7, Phylogeny: 161 - 244. Royal Silva, M.F. da. & Carreira, L.M.M. (1995). Leguminosas de Amazonia
Rudd, V.E. (1969). A synopsis of the genus Piscidia (Leguminosae). in a temperate legume clade: are there "so many species" of Botanic Gardens, Kew. brasileira: 4. Heterostemon Desf. (Leg. Caesalp.) Bo/. Mus .
Phytologia 18: 473-499. Astragalus (Fabaceae)? Amer.]. Bot. 83: 1488-1502. Paraense Emilio Goe/di, Bot. 10(2): 189-220.
Schrire, B.D . (2000). A synopsis of the genus Philenoptera
Rud d, V.E. (1970) . Etaba llia dub ia (Legumin osae), a new Sanderson, M.J., Purvis, A. & H enze, C. (1998). Phylogenetic (Leguminosae-Millettieae) from Africa and Madagascar. Kew Bull. Silva, M.F. da & Graham, A. (1980). jacqueshuberia Ducke
combination. Phytologia 20: 426-428. supertrees: assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 55: 81-94. (Leguminosae-Caesalpi nioideae), um genera exclusivamente
105-109. neotropical. Acta Amazon. 10(4): 747-754.
Rudd, V.E. Cl972a). Supplemen tary studies in Chaetocalyx I. Scluire, B.D. & Andrews, S. (1992). Sutherlandia: Gansies or Balloon
(Leguminosae) including a new species from Brazil. Phytologia Sanjappa, M. (1986). A revision of the genus Hu mboldtia Yahl. peas: Part 1. Plantsman 14: 65-69. Simpson , B.B. (ed. (1 n . Mesquite, its biology in two desert shrub
24: 295-297. (Leguminosae: Caesa lpinioideae). Blumea 31: 329-339. ecosystems. Do~ den, Hutchinson & Ross , Stroudsberg,
Schrire, B.D., Lavin, M, Barker, N.P. , Cortes-Burns, H ., von Senger, Pennsylvania, USA. Pp. 250.
Rudd, V.E. Cl972b). A new variety of Poiretia latifolia and a brief Sanjappa, M. (1987, publ. 1989). Revision of the genus Butea Roxb. I. & Kim, J .-H . (2003). Towa rds a phylogeny of Indigo/era
resume of the genus Poiretia Vent. (Leguminosae). Phytologia 23: ex Willd. and Meizo tropis Voight (Fabaceae) . Bull. Bot. Surv. (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae): identification of major clades and Simpson, B.B. (1998). A revision of Pomaria (Fabaceae) in North
141-148. India 29: 199 -225. re lative ages. In B.B. Klitgaarcl & A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in America. Lundellia 1: 46-71.
Legume Systematics 10, Higher Level Systematics: 269-302. Royal Simpson, B.B. (1999). A revision of Hojfmann.seggia (Fabaceae) in
Rudd, V.E. (1972c). A new species of 1Wyrocarpus (Legurninosae) and Sanjappa, M. (1992). Legumes of Indic1. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal
Singh, Debra Dun. Pp. 338. Botanic Gardens, Kew. North America. Lundellia 2: 14-54.
a brief resume of the genus. Phytologia 23: 401-404.
Schrire , B.D., Lavin, M. & Lewis, G.P. (2005). Global distribution Simpson, B.B. & Lewis, G.P. (2003). New combinations in Pomaria
Rudd, V.E. (1974). A resume of the genus Tipuana (Legumin osae). Sanjappa, M. 0995). Leguminosae-Papilionoideae: Tribe
Indigofereae. Fasel. Fl. India 21: 1-167. patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies. In (Caesalpinioideae: Legumin >sae). Kew Bull. 58 (1): 175-184.
Phytologia 28: 475-478.
I. Friis & H . Balslev (eds.), Plant diversity and complexity patterns:
local, regional and global din1ensions. Biol. Ski·. 55: 375-422.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 537
536 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Simpson, B.B. & Miao, B.-M. 0997). The circum scription of Sokoloff, D.D. (2003b). On the limits of the genera Coronilla and Standley, P.C . & Steyermark (1946). Haematoxylon L. Flora of Stit10n, C.H . (1991). Notes on the genus Otbolobium (Psoraleeae,
Hof!mannseggia (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioicleae: Caesalpinieae) and Hippocrepis (Leguminosae, Loteae). Bot. Zhurn . (Moscow & Guatemala. Fieldiana: Bot. 24(5): 137-141. Faboicleae). 5. Four new species from Namaqualancl, South Africa.
its allies using morphological and cpDNA restriction site data. Leningrad) 88 (6): 108-113. S. African}. Bot. 57: 123 - 127.
PlantSyst. Evol. 205: 157-178. Stanley, T.D. & Ross, E.M. (eds.) (1983). Flora of south -eastern
Solacloye, M.O. 0985). A revision of Baphia (Leguminos ae- Queensland. Volume 1, pp. 545. Queensland Dept. of Prima1y Stones, M. & Curtis, W. (1978). The endemic flora of Tasmania 6.
Simpson, B.B., L'lrkin, L.L. & Weeks, A. (2003). Progress towards Papilionoideae). Kew Bull. 40: 291-386. Industries, Brisbane. Ariel Press, London. Pp. 482.
resolving the relationships of the Caesalpinia group Takeda, H. (1913). Cladrastis and Maaekia . Notes Roy. Bot. Gard.
(Caesa lpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). In B.B. Klitgaarcl Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mott, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, Stearn, W.T. (2002). Stearn's dictionaiy ofplant names for gardeners:
M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., a handbook on the origin and meaning of the botanical names Edinburgh 8: 95-103.
& A. Bnmeau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 10, Higher
Level Systematics: 123-148. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Swenson, S.M., Prince, L.M., Kress, W.J., Nixon, K.C. & Farris.JS. of some cultivated plants. Cassell, London. Pp. 363. Takhtajan, A.L. (1986) . Floristic Regions of the Wo1·/d. University of
(2000). Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, California Press, Berkeley & London . Pp. 522.
Simpson, B.B., Tate, ] .A. & Weeks , A. (2004). Phylogeny a nd Steege, H. ter (1990) . A monograph of Wallaba, Mora and
and atpB sequences. Bot}. Linn. Soc. 133: 381 - 461.
character evolution of Hoffmannseggia (Caesalpinieae: Greenheart. Tropenbos Techn. Ser. 5. Pp. 141. Talavera, S. & Salgueiro, F.J. 0999). Sobre el tratamiento de la tribu
Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Sys/. Bot. 29(4): 933-946. Sorarli, S.B. 0974). Revision de Ana11hropbyllum, genera argentino- Cytiseae Bercht. & ]. Pres! (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae) en
Steele, K.P. & Wojciechowski, M.F. (2003). Pl1ylogenetic analyses of
ch ileno de Leguminosas. Darwinian.a 18: 453-488. "Flora Iberica". Analesjard. Bot. Madrid 57: 200-218.
Simpson, B.B., Tate, ].A . & Weeks, A. (2005). The biogeography of tribes Trifolieae and Vicieae, based on sequences of the plasticl
Hojfmannseggia. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae): Sorensen, M. 0988). A taxonomic revision of the genus Pachyrhizus gene, matK (Papilionoicleae: Leguminosae). In B.B. Klitgaard & Talavera, S., Aeclo, C., Castroviejo, S., Romero Zarco, C., Saez, L. ,
a tale of many travels.]. Biogeog1·. 32: 15-27. (Fabaceae-Phaseoleae). Nordic}. Bot. 8: 167-192. A. Brnneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, 10, Higber Salgueiro, F.J. & Velayos, M. (1999) . Flora Iberica. Vol 7(1)
Level Systematics: 355-370. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. leguminosae (partim) . Real Jardin Botanico, Madrid. Pp. 580.
Simpson, G. (1945). A revision of the genus Carmichaelia. Trans. Sorensen , M. 0996). Yam Bean: Pachyrhizus DC. Rome:
Roy. Soc New Zealand 75: 231-287. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Pp. 141. Steenis, C.G.G.J., van (1960). Neocollettia. In M.S. van Meeuwen, H.P Talavera, S., Aedo, C., Castroviejo, S., Herrero, A., Romero Zarco, C.,
Nooteboom & C.G.G.]. van Steenis. Preliminary revisions of Salgueiro, F.J. & Velayos, M. (2000). Flora !berica. Vol 7(2)
Singh, V. 0992). Some new combinations in Chamaecrista Moench Sorensen, M., Estrella Engelmann, J.E ., Hamann, O.]. & Santa Ana some genera of Malaysi an Papilionaceae 1. Reinwardtia 5:
Rios Ruiz, M. C. (eels.) (1998). Proceedings of 2nd International Leguminosae (partim). Real Jardin Botanico, Madrid. Pp. 540.
and Senna Mill.}. Econ . Taxon . Bot. 16: 599-600. 436-437.
Symposium on Tuberous Legumes, Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico, Tateishi, Y. & Ohashi, H. (1977) . A second species of Nesphostylis
Sirjaev, G. 0925-1926). Onobrychis generis revisio critica. Spisy 5-8 August 1996, pp. 566. DSR Boghanclel , Cope nh agen, Steenis, C.G.G.J., van (1975). A review of the genus Sympetalandra (Leguminosae) from Asia. Bot Mag. (Tokyo) 90: 149-152.
Pi'fr. Fak. Masarykovy Univ. Part 1 (Cis 56, 1925), pp. 195; Parts Denmark. Stapf and its position in Caesalpinio icleae. Blumea 22: 159-167.
2 & 3 (Cis 76, 1926), pp. 165. Taubert, P. (1889). Leguminosae novae v. minus cognitae austro-
Sousa S., M. 0992) . Wi/lardia, una nueva secci6n de! genero Steiner, J.J , Robinson, W.A., Liston, A. & Taylor, N.L. (1997). americanae. Flora 72: 421-422.
Sirjaev, G. 0932). Generis Ononis L. revisio crit ica. Beih. Bot Lonchocarpus (Leguminosae). Anales Inst. Biol. Univ. Nae. Auton. ITS and RAPD phylogenetic hypotheses and the ecological
Cen tralbl. 49(2): 381-665. Mexico, Ser. Bot. 63(2): 146-154. distributions of North American Trifolium L. (Fabaceae). Amer.}. Tavares, A.S. & Silva, M.F. (1992). Oistribui\;iiO geografica do genero
Bot. 84 (suppl.): 235-236. Cyn.ometra L. (Caesalpiniaceae) no mundo. Acta Amazon. 22(1):
Skalicka, A. 0969). Taxonomische Revision der Gattung Lembotropis Sousa S., M. 0993). El genero Inga (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) clel 17 - 22.
Griseb. Acta Univ. Carol., Biol. 1968: 263-277. sur cle Mexico y Centroamerica, estuclio previo para la Flora Stergios, B. (1996). Contributions to South American Caesalpiniaceae.
Mesoamericana. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 223-269. II. A taxonomic update of Campsiandra (Caesalpinieae). Novon Taylor, J.M. & Crisp, M.D. (1992). A revision of Chorizema
Small, E. 0987). Generic changes in Trifolieae subtribe Trigonellinae. (Leguminosae: Mirbelieae). Austral. Syst. Bot. 5: 249 -335.
6: 434-459.
In C.H.Stirton (ed.), Advances in Legume Systematics 3: 169-181. Sousa S., M. & Andrade M., G. 0992). lclentidad de Mierolobius y
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Goldmania (Mimosoicleae: Mimoseae) y nuevas combinaciones. Stergios, B. & Berry, P.E. (1996). Contributions to South American Tellez, V.0. (1986). El genero Tephrosia (Leguminosae) en Oaxaca .
Anales Inst. Biol. Univ. Nae. Auton. Mexico, Bot 63: 101-107. Caesalpiniaceae. I. Two new species of jaequeshuberia from the Tesis, Universiclad Nacional Aut6nomia de Mexico. Pp. 74.
Small, E. & Brookes, B.S. (1984) . Reduction of the geocarpic
Venezuelan Guayana. Novon 6: 429-433.
Factorovskya to Medicago. Taxon 33: 622-635. Sousa S., M & Antonio, O.R. (2001). Diphysa. Flora de Nicaragua. Teixeira, S.P. & Ranga, N.T. (2004). Biosystematics of the genus
Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gai·d. 85, 2: 1003-1004. Stergios, B. & Cowan, R.S. (1999). Aldina. In ].A . Steyermark, P.E. Dahlstedtia Malme (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Millettieae).
Small, E. & Jomphe, M, (1989). A synopsis of the genus Medieago
Berry, K. Yatskievych & B.K. Holst (eels.), Flora of the Venezuelan Revista Brasil. Bot. 27: 37-45.
(Leguminosae). Canad.]. Bot. 67: 3260 - 3294. Sousa S., M. & Delgado S., A. 0993). Mexican Leguminosae - Guayana. Vol. 5. Missouri Botanical Garden.
Phytogeography, enclemism and origins. In T.P. Ramamoorthy, R. Thompson, I.R. (2001). Morphometric analysis and revision of eastern
Small, E., Lassen, P. & Brookes, B.S. (1987). An expanded circum- Australian Hovea (Brongniartieae-Fabaceae). Austral. Syst. Bot. 14:
Bye, A. Lot & ]. Fa (eds.), Biological Diversity ofMexico: Origins Stergios, B. & Stergios, P.R. (1997). Contributions to South American
scription of Medicago (Leg uminosae, Trifolieae) based on
and Distribution, pp. 459- 511. Oxford University Press, Oxford Caesalpiniaceae. III. Campsiandra wurdackiana (Caesalpinieae), 1- 99.
explosive flower tripping. Willdenowia 16: 415-437.
& New York. a new species from the Venezuelan Guayana. BioL/ania Ed.
Thompson , I.R., Lacliges, P.Y. & Ross, J.H. (2001). Phylogenetic
Small , E., Brookes, B. & Lassen, P. (1989) . Circumscription of the Espec. 6: 527-535.
Sousa S., M. & Rucki, V.E. 0993). Revision de! genero Styphnolobium studies of the tribe Brongniartieae (Fabaceae) using nuclear DNA
genus Medicago (Leguminosae) by seed characters . Canad. }.
(Leguminosae, Papilionoicleae, Sophoreae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Stevenson, GA. 0969). An agronomic and taxonomic review of the (ITS-1) and morphological data . Syst. Bot. 26: 557-570.
Bot. 68: 613-629.
Gard. 80: 270-283. genus Melilotus Mill. Canad.). Pl. Sci. 49: 1-20.
Thompson, ]. 0990). New species and new comb inations in the
Smith,. A.C. 0940). Notes on the genus Amburana Schwacke & genus Swainsona (Fabaceae) in New South Wales. Telopea 4: 1- 5
Spegazzini, C.L. 0924). Ramorinoa. Physis 7: 262-265. Steyaert, R.L. 0951). Contribution a l'etude du genre Dialium. Bull.
Taub. (Torresea Allem.). Trap. Woods 62: 28-31.
Soc . Roy. Bot, Belgique 84: 29-45.
Spellenberg, R. 0976). Chromosome numbers and th eir Thompson,]. 0993). A revision of the genus Swainsona (Fabaceae).
Smith, C.P. 0938--1953). Species Lupinorum. Saratoga, California. Stirton, C.H. (1975). A contribution to knowledge of the genus Telopea 5: 427-582.
cytotaxonomic significance for North American Astragalus
Pp. 768. Eriosema (Leguminosae-Lotoideae) in Southern Africa (excluding
(Fabaceae). Taxon 25: 463-476.
Thompson, R.L. 0980). A revision ofLysiloma (Leguminosae). PhD.
Smith, P.P., Timberlake, ].~. & Van Wyk, A.E. (1998). Proposal to Mofambique and Rhodesia): a thesis . University of Natal,
Spongberg, S.A. & Ma,]. 0997). Cladrastis (Leguminosae subfamily dissertation, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale. Pp. 107.
conserve the name Colophospermum against Hardwickia Pietermaritzburg. Pp. 182.
(Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Taxon 47: 751-752. Faboicleae tribe Sophoreae): a historic and taxonomic overview.
Thorne, R.F. (1972). Major disjunctions in the geographic ranges of
Int. Dendrol. Soc. Year Book: 27-35. Stirton, C.H. (198la). Psoraleeae. In R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven
(eels.), Advances in Legume Systematics 1: 337- 343. Royal Botanic seed plants. Quart. Rev. Biol. 47: 365-411.
Soares-Silva, L.H. & Mansano, V.F., de (2004). A new species of
E>::ostyles (Leguminosae-Papilionoicleae -Swartzieae s .l.) from Sprague, T.A. 0931). The botanical name of "Tara". Bull. Misc.
Gardens, Kew. Thothathri, K. (1982). Leguminosae: genus Derris. Flora of India,
Parana State, Brazil. Bot.]. Linn. Soc. 146: 103 - 106. Inform., Kew 1931: 91-96.
Fascicle 8. Howrah, Botanical Survey of India. Pp. 32.
Stirton, C.H. (198lb). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoicleae of
Sokoloff, D.D. 0997). Frnit anatomy as a taxonomic character in the Sprent, ].!. (2001). Nodulation in Legumes. Royal Botanic Gardens, southern Africa. Bothalia 13: 317-325. Thothathri, K. (1987). Ta.,"Conomic revision of the Dalbergieae in the
tribe Loteae (Papilionaceae). Proc. Int. Conj on plant anatomy Kew. Pp. 146.
Indian subcontinent. Botanical Su1vey of India, Calcutta. Pp.
Stirton, C.H. (198lc). The genus Dipogon (Leg umin osae-
and morphology, St. Petersburg, 1997: 121 . (in Russian). Russian Sprent, ].I. & McKey, D. (1994). Advances in Legume Systematics, 5, 244.
Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Papilionoicleae). Bothalia 13: 327-330.
T71e Nitrogen Factor. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Pp. 241.
Tbuan, N. van 0972). Revision de genre Shuteria (Papilionaceae).
Stirton, C.H. (1986a). Notes on the genus Otholobium (Psoraleeae,
Sokoloff, D.D. 0999). Ottleya, a new genus of Papilionaceae-Loteae Stafleu, F.A. 0978). International code of botanical nomenclature: Adansonia, Ser. 2, 12: 291-305.
from North America. Feddes Repert. 110 (1-2 ): 89-97. Fabaceae). S. African}. Bot. 52: 1-6.
adopted by the Twelfth International Botanical Congress,
Thuan, N. van (1979). Legumineuses-Papilionoldees-Phaseolees. In
Leningrad, July 1975. Regnum Vegetabile, Vol. 97. Pp. 457. Stirton, C. H. (1986b). Polhil/ia, a new genus of papilionoid legumes
Sokoloff, D.D. (2000). New combinations in Acmispon (Leguminosae, A. Aubreville & J .-F. Leroy (eels.), Flore du Cambodge, du Laos et
Loteae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 37(2): 125-131. endemic to South Africa. S. African}. Bot. 52: 167-180.
Stafleu , F.A. & Cowan, R.S. (1976-1988; subsequent supplements by du Vietnam 17: 59-62. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle,
Sokoloff, D.D. (2003a). On the system and phylogeny of the tribe o ther compilers). Taxonomic Literature. Ed. 2. Vol.s 1-7 and Stirton, C.H. (eel.) (1987). Advances in Legume Systematics, 3. Royal Paris.
Loteae DC. (Leguminosae). Byull. Moskovsk . Obshch . lsp. Prir., Supplements. Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht. Botanic Gardens, Kew. Pp. 466.
Thuan, N. van, Dy Phon, P., & Niyomdham, C. (1987).
Otd. Biol. 108 (3): 35-48. (In Russian) Standley, P.C. (1922) . Trees and shrubs of Mexico (Fagaceae- Stirton, C.H. (1989). A revision of the genus Otholobium CH. Stirton Legumineuses- Papilionolclees. Jn P.H . Morat (eel.), Flore du
Fabaceae). Contr. US. Natl. Herb. 23(2): 171-515. (Psoraleeae, Leguminosae). Ph.D. (University of Cape Town). 2 Cambodge du Laos et du Vietnam 23: 3-258. Museum National
vols. Pp. 450. d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 541
540 LEGUMES OF THE WORLD
Vaz, A.M.S. da F. (2003). Leguminosae Caesalpinioideae: Cercideae:
Villiers, J. -F. 0990). Contribution a l'etucle du genre Newtonia Baillon Wei, z. (ed.) (1 994) . Leguminosae (2), Papiliono ideae 1. Flora Windler, D.R. (1966) . A rev ision of the genus Neptunia
Bauhinia. Flora dos estados de Goicis e Tocantins Colefiio Rizzo
30: 1-121. (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) en Afrique. Bull.Jard. Bot. Belg. 60: Reipublicae Sinicae 40: 1- 352. Science Press, Beijing. (Leguminosae). Austral.]. Bot. 14: 379 - 420.
11 9-138.
Vaz, A.M.S. d a F. & Tozzi, A.M.G. de A. (2003). Bauhinia se r. Welzen, P.C., van & Hengst, S., den 0984). The genus Mastersia Windler, D.R. (1974). A systematic treatment of the native u nifoliolate
Villiers, ]. -F. 0994). Alantsilodendron Villiers, genre nouveau de (Papi lio noicleae: Phaseo leae). Blum.ea 30: 77- 87. Crota larias of North Ame ri ca (Leguminosae) . Rhodora 76:
Cansenia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) no Brasil. Rodriguesia
55(83): 55-143. Leguminosae-Mimosoideae de Madagascar. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. 151-204.
Nat., B, Adansonia 16: 65 - 70. Welzen, P.C., van & Hengst, S. , den (1985). A revision of the genus
Venter, F. & Venter J.-A. 0996). Making the most of indigenous trees. Dysolobium (Pa pilionaceae) and the transfer o f subgenus Windler, D.R. & Windler, B.K. 0974). Neptunia in Mexico
Villiers, J.-F. 0995). A new species of Adenanthera L. (Leguminosae, Dolicbovigna to Vigna . Blumea 30: 363 - 383. (Leguminosae). Southw. Natumlist 19: 337-340.
Briza Publi cations, Pretoria. Pp. 305.
Mimosoideae) fro m Madagascar. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B,
Verdcourt, B. (1969). The a rid corridor between the No rth East Adansonia 16: 227-230. Wemple , D.K. (1970). Revision of the genus Petalostemon . Iowa Wink, M. & Mohamed, G.l.A. (2003). Evolution of chemical defense
and South West areas of Africa. In E.M. van Zinderen Bakker State.]. Sci. 45: 1-102. traits in the Leguminosae: ma pping o f distribution patterns o f
Villiers, J .-F. & Gu ine t, P. 0 989). Lemurodendron Villiers et Guinet, secondary metabolites on a molecular phylogeny inferred from
(ed.), Palaeoecology of Africa 4: 140-144. A.A. Balkema, Cape Wendt, T. (1993) . Composition, flor istic affiniti es, and origins of the
Town. genre nouveau de Leguminosae Mimosoicleae de Madagascar. nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 31:
Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 11: 3- 10. canopy tree flora of the Mexican Atlantic slope rainforests. In T.P. 897-917.
Verdcou1t, B. 0970a). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papil ionoideae for Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot & ]. Fa (eds.), Biological Diversity of
Voorhoeve, A.G. (1965). Liberian H igh Forest Trees . PUDOC, Mexico: Origins and Distribution, pp. 595- 680. Oxford University Wittstein, G.C. 0856). Etymologisch-botaniscbes Handwonerbuch,
the Flora of Tro pica l East Africa. I. Kew Bull. 24: 1- 70. Wageningen.
Press, Oxford. ed.2. ).].Palm & E.Enke, Erlangen. Pp. 952 .
Verdcouit, B. 0970b). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae for
Vural, M. & Tan, K. 0983). New taxa and records from Turkey. Wenniger, J. 0991). Revision van Astragahts L. sect. Chlorostachys Wojciechowski, M~F. (2003). Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes
the Flora of Tropica l East Africa. IL Kew Bull. 24: 235-307.
Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 41 0): 65 -76. Bunge, sect. Pbyllolobium Bung , und se I. Skylbropos Simpson (Legumin sae): an early 21st century perspective. In B.B. Klitgaard
Verdcmnt, B. 0970c). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae fo r (Leguminosae). Mill. Bot. /a{//ssmnml. Mii11cbe11 30: 1-196. & A. Bnmeau (eels.), Advances in Legume Systematics 10, High er
Wagstaff, SJ., Heenan, P.B. & Sanderson, M.J. (1999). Classification,
the Flora of Tropica l East Africa. III. Kew Bull. 24: 379-447. Level Systematics: 5-35. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
orig ins and pa tt e rns of diversificati o n in New Zealand Wheeler, E. & Baas, P. 0992). Fossil wood of the Leguminosae: a
Verclcowt, B. (1970d). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papiliono ideae for Carmichae!inae. Amer.]. Bot. 86: 1346-1356. case study in xylem evolution a nd ecological anatomy. In P.S. Wo jciechowski, M.F., Sanderson, M.]. & Hu , J.-M. (1999). Evidence
the Flora of Tropical East Africa. IV. Kew Bull. 24: 507-569. Herendeen & D.L. Dilcher (eds.), Advances in Legum e on the monophyly of Astragalus (Fabaceae) and its major
Wa!pers, G.G. (1842). Subtribe Bauhinieae Benth. Repertorium
botanices systematicae I: 847-853. Leipzig. Systematics 4, The Fossil Reco rd: 281-301. Royal Botanic subgrou ps based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast
Verclcourt, B. (1971). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae for
Gardens, Kew . DNA trnL intron data. Syst. Bot. 24: 409 - 437.
the Flora of Tropica l East Africa. V. Kew Bull. 25: 65 -169. Wa lsh, N.G . & Entwisle, T.]. (eds.) 0996). Flora of Victoria:
Dicotyledons: Winteraceae toMyrtaceae. Volume 3. Inkata Press, Wheeler, J .R. , Rye, B.L. , Koch, B.L. & Wilson , A.JG. (eds.) 0992). Wojciechowski, M.F., Sanderson, M.]. , Steele, K.P. & Liston, A. (2000).
Verclcourt, B. 0974). Summa1y of the Leguminosae-Papilionoicleae-
Melbourne. Pp. 1093. Flora of the Kimberley Region. Como, Western Au stralia, Molecular phylogeny of the "Temperate Herbaceous Tribes" of
Hedysareae (sensu. lato) o f Flora Zambesiaca . Kirkia 9(2):
359-556. Department o f Conservation and Land Management. Pp. 1327. papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. In P.S. Herendeen &
Wardle, P. 0 991). Vegetation ofNew Zealand. Cambridge University A. Brnneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 9: 277-298.
Press. Pp. 672. White, F. (1977). 111e underground forests of Africa: a preliminary Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Verclcourt, B. 0978). A new combination in Oxy1·hynchus
(Legumin osae-Phaseoleae). Kew Bull. 32: 779-780. review. Gardens Bull., Singapore 29: 57-71.
Wa rwi ck, M. & Lewis, G.P. (2003). Revis io n of Plathymenia Wojciechowski, M.F., Sanderson, MJ., Steele, K.P. & l.!:;1011. A. (200~).
(Leguminosae-Mimosoideae). Edinburgh ]. Bot. 60: 111 - 119. White, F. (1983). 7be Vegetation of Africa. A descriptive memoir to • upcrtrc o f Hologaleg in a (Fabaceae). hllp ://loco ucclav1s,
Verclcourt, B. 0979). A manu al of New Guinea Legumes. Office of
accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNS C vegetation map of s:clu/ woio/ l·Jgsupenrec,html.
Forests, Division of Botany, Lae, Papua New Gu inea, Botany Wa1wick, M. & Pennington, R.T. (2002). A revision of Cyc/olobium
Bulletin 11: 1-645. Africa. UNESCO, Paris. Pp. 356.
(Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Edinburgh]. Bot. 59: 247-257. Wojciechowski, M.F., Lavin , M. & Sande rson, M.J. (2004). A
White, F. & Leonard, ]. (1991). Phytogeographical links between phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the
Verdcouit, B. 0982a). A revision of Macrotyloma (Leguminosae). Warwick, M.C., Lewis, G.P. & Lima, H.C., de. (submitted). Revision
Hooker's Icon Pl. 38(4): 1-138. Africa and Southwest Asia. Flora et Vegetatio Mundi 9: 229 - 246. plastid matK gene resolves many well-suppoltecl subclades within
of Barnebydendron (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae-Detarieae).
Edinburgh j. Bot. Wickens, G.E. (1969). A study o f Acacia albida . Kew Bull. 23: the family. Amer.]. Bot. 91 ( 11): 1845-1861.
Verdcourt, B. 0982b). Gigasiphon humblotianum (Legum inosae-
181-202. Wolfe, ].A . (1975). Some aspects of plant geography of the Noithern
Caesalp inioideae-Bauhinieae) as a drift seed . Kew Bull. 36 : Watson , L.E., Sayed Ahmed , H. & Badr, A. (2000). Molecu lar
659-660. Wieringa , ].] . 0999). Monopetalanthus exit. A systematic study of hemisphere during the late Cretaceous and Tertia ry . Ann .
phylogeny o f Old World Trifolium (Fabaceae), based o n plastid
Aphanocalyx, Bikinia., !curia, Michelsonia and Tetraberlinia Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 264-279.
Verdcourt, B. 0997). A new species of Ophrestia H.M .L.Forbes and nuclear markers. Pl. Syst. Evol. 224(3-4): 153-171.
(Leguminosae, Caesalpinioicleae). Wageningen Agric. Univ. Pap. Wolfe, ].A. 0985). Distribution of major vegetational types during the
(Leguminosae: Phaseoleae) from Zambia. Kew Bull. 52: 495-497. Watt, J.M. & Breyer-Brandwijk, M.G. 0962). 7be medicinal and 99(4). 1-320 Tertia1y. In E.T. Sundquist & W.S. Broecke r (eels.), The carbon
Ve rd co urt , B. (2000). Tribes Desmoclieae, Psora le eae and poisonous plants ofsouthern and eastern Africa. Ed.2. Livingstone,
Edinburgh & London. Pp. 1457. Wieringa, ].]. & Gervais, G.Y.F. (2003). Phylogen etic analysis of cycle and atmospheric COi= natural variations Archean to Present.
Aeschynomeneae. In G.V. Pope (eel.), Flora Zambesiaca 3(6).
Royal Botanic Ga rde ns, Kew. Pp. 175. combined morphological and molecular data sets on the Amer. Ceophys. Union Mon ogr. 32: 357-376.
Webb, C.O. (2000). Exploring the phylogenetic strucn1re of ecological Aphanocalyx-Bikinia-Tetraberlinia grou p (Legumin osae,
communities: an example for rain forest trees. Amer. Naturalist Wolfe, J .A. (1990). Palaeobotanical evidence for a marked
Verclcourt, B. & Halliday , P. (1978). A revision of Psophocarpus Caesalpinioicleae, De tarieae s. 1.). In B.B. Klitgaarcl & A. Bruneau
156: 145 - 155. temperature increase following the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary.
(Leg umin osae-Pap ili o n oideae-Phaseoleae) . Kew Bull. 33: (eds .), Advances in Legume Systematics IO , Higher Level
191-227. Nature 343: 153 -156.
Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPee k, M.A. & Donoghue, M.]. (2002). Systematics: 181-196. Royal Botanic Garde ns, Kew.
Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: Wolfe, ].A. & Upchurch , Jr., G.R. (1987). Leaf assemblages across the
Vidal, J.E. & Hu i Tho!, S. 0974). Revision du genre Pterolobium Wilbur, R.L. 0975). A revision of the North American genus Amo1pha
475-505. Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the Raton Basin, New Mexico
(Caesalpiniaceae). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat ., Ser. 3, no. 227, Bot. (Leguminosae-Papilionoicleae). Rhodora 77: 337 - 409.
15: 1- 29. and Colorado. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A . 84: 5096-5100.
Weber, A. (ed.) (2001). An introductory field guide to the floweri ng Wilczek, R. (1952). Amphimanteae. In W. Robyns (ed.), Flore du
plants of the Golfo Dul e min forests Costa Rica: Cor ·ov;1do Wood. C.E. (1949). The American barbistyled species of Tephrosia
Vid al, J.E. & Hui Th a l, S. Cl976a). Cesalpiniac ees Asiatiques Congo Beige et du Ruanda-Urundi 3: 546-549.
National Park and Piedras Blancas National Park ("Regenwald der (Leguminosae). Rbodora 51: 193-231; 233- 302; 305-364; 369-384.
nouve lles. Adansonia, ser. 2, 15(3): 391- 396.
Osterreicher"). Stapfia 78: 1- 462. Wilczek, R. 0954). Phaseolinae. Jn W. Robyns, (ed.), Flore du Congo
Beige et du Ru.anda-Urnndi 6: 392-409. Wood, JR.I. (2003). Inter-Andean va lleys o f Bolivia: insights into
Vidal, J.E. & Hui Thal, S. 0976b). Revision des Caesalpinia asiatiques.
Weber, ].Z. 0 986). Leguminosae. In JP. Jessop & H.R. Toelken (eds.), flori s tic rel ationships and patte rns of endemism from
Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Ser. 3, no. 395, Bot. 27: 1- 135. Wilm ot-Dear, M. (1984). A revision o f Mucuna (Legumin osae-
Flora of South Australia, pa1t 2, pp. 505-709. South Australia Acanthaceae, Asclepiaclaceae and Labiateae. In Tropical savannas
Vieira, M.G.G. 0990). Contribuii;:ao ao estuclo taxon6mico do genera Government Printing Division, Ade laide. Phaseoleae) in China and Japan. Kew Bull. 39: 23-65. and seasonally dry forests, ecology, environment and development.
Crudia Schreber (Caesalpiniaceae) na Amazonia brasileira. Bal. Conference abstracts, p. 34. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh.
Wei, C.F. 0983). Materials of Saraca, Lysidice and Cercis from China . Wilmot-Dear, M. (1987). A revision of Mucuna (Leguminosae-
Mus. Paraense Emilio Goe/di, Bot. 6: 83-112.
Guihaia 3(1): 11-17. Papilionoicleae) in the Indian Subcontinent and Burma. Kew Bull. Woods, M. (1988). A revision ofApios and Cochlianthus (Leguminosae).
Villiers, J .-F. 0983). Le genre Pseudoprosopis Harms (Mimosaceae) 42: 23-46. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Pp. 152.
en Afrique. Bull.Jard . Bot. Belg. 53: 417- 436. Wei, Y. 0991). Th e classification and distribution of the genus
Flemingia Roxb. ex Ait. in China. Guihaia 11: 193-207. Wilmot-Dear, M. (1990). A rev isio n of Mucuna (Legum inosae- Wouw, M. va n de, Maxted, N., Chabane, K. & Ford Lloyd, B.V.
Villiers, J.-F. (1984). Le genre Calpocalyx (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) Papilionoideae) in the Pacific. Kew Bull. 45: 1-25. (2001). Mo lecular taxonomy of Vicia ser. Vicia based on
en Afriqu e. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 6: 297-311. Wei, Y. 0995). Dumasia DC. In Lee S. K. (ed.), Flora Reipublicae amplified fragment le ngth polymorphisms. Pl. Syst. Evol. 229
Popularis Sinicae 41, Leguminosae (3) Papilionoideae 2, pp. Wilmot-Dear, M. 0991). A revision of Mucuna (Leguminosa e-
(1-2): 91-105.
Villiers, J.-F. 0989). Leguminosae, Mimosoideae. In P.H. Marat (ed.), 247-256. Science Press, Beijing. Papilionoicleae) in the Philippines. Kew Bull. 46: 213-251.
Flore du Gabon. 31. Museum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Wouw, M. va n de, Maxted, N. & Fo rd Ll oyd , B.V. (2003) . A
Pp. 185. Wei, Z. 0981). Antberoporum Gagnep. (Leguminosae), a genus new Wilmot-D e ar, M. 0992) . A revision of Mucuna (Leguminosae-
multivariate and cladistic study of Vicia L. ser. Vicia (Fabaceae)
to China. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 19: 351-354. Papilionoideae) in Thailand, Indochina and the Malay Peninsula.
based on ana lysis of morphological characters. Pl. Syst. Eva!.
Kew Bull. 47: 203-245.
237(1-2): 19 - 39.
546 LEGUMESOFTHEWORLD
INDEX TO ILLUSTRATIONS 547
Duparquetia orchidacea Bail!. 113 - lindblomii (Harms)j.B .Gillett 487 Hesperolaburnum platycarpum (Maire)Maire 292 - strigosa (Benth.)Dewit & P.A.Duvign. 331
Dussia tessmannii Harms 231 - o.fficinalis L. 487 Hesperothamnus pentaphyllus Harms 378 Kummerowia striata (Thunb.)Schindl. 434
- sp. 231 Gastrolobium. bilo~um R.Br. 351 Heterostemon mimosoides Desf. 97 Kunstleria sarawakensis Ridd.-Num. & Kornet 377
Dysolobium grande (Benth.)Prain 414 - bracteoloswn (F.Muell .)G.Chandler & Crisp 352 Hippocrepis baleai'ica ]acq. 457
- pyramidale T.Moore 352 - scabra DC. 457 Labichea lanceolata Benth. subsp . lanceolata 117
Ebenopsis confinis (Standl.)Barneby & J.W.Grimes 208 - rubrum (Crisp)G .Chandler & Crisp 352 Hoffmannseggia glauca (Ortega)Eifert 145 Lab/ab purpureus (L.)Sweet 425
Ebenus armitagei Schweinf. & Taub. 495 Geissaspis c1'istata Wight & Arn. 332 Hoita rnacrostachya (DC.)Rydb. 449 Laburnum anagyroides Medilc 291, 297
- cretica L. 488, 495 Genista microphylla DC. 295 Holocalyx balansae Micheli 222 - x watereri (Kirchner)Dippel 291
- pinnata Aiton 495 - tinctoria L. 295 Hosackia gracilis Benth. 460 Lackeya multiflora (Torr. & A.Gray)Fortunato, L.P.Queiroz
Echinospartum algibicum Talavera & Aparicio 293 - sp. (Rivasgodaya nervosa Esteve) 295 Hovea chorizemifolia DC. 257 & G .P.Lewis 399
Ecuadendron acosta-solisianum D.A.Neill 95 Genistidium dumosum I.M.]ohnst. 472 - longifolia R.Br. var. montana (Hook.f.)].H .Willis 257 Lamprolobiumfruticosum Benth. 258
Eleiotis rottleri Wight & Arn. 445 Geoffroea deco1ticans (Gillies ex Hook. & Arn.)Burkart 323 - pu.ngens Benth. 252 Lasiobema cbampionii (Benth.)de Wit 66
Elephantorrhiza elephantina (Burch.)Skeels 170 - spinosa ]acq. 323 - trispenna Benth. 257 Lathynts boissieri Sitj. 507
Eligmocarpus cynometroides Capuron 114 Gigasiphon humblotianum (Baill.)Drake 62 Humboldtia unijuga Bedd. var. trijuga].]oseph & - japonicus Willd. 507
Elizabetha coccinea Schomb. ex Benth. var. oxyphylla - macrosiphon (Harms)Brenan 62 V.Chandras. 94 - splendens Kellogg 507
(Harms)R.S.Cowan 97 - schlechte1'i (Harms)de Wit 62 Humularia rosea (De Wild.)P.A.Duvign. var. reptans Latrobea diosmifolia (Benth.)Benth. var. glabrescens Benth.
Erninia antennulifera (Baker)Taub. 419 Gilbeniodendron bilineatum (Hutch. & Dalziei)j.Leonard (Verdc.)Verdc. 332 344
Endertia spectabilis van Steenis & de Wit 85 104 Hydrochorea corymbosa (Rich.)Barneby & ].W.Grimes 204 Lebeckia cytisoides Thunb. 275
Endosamara racemosa (Roxb.)R.Geesink 370 Gilletiodendron kisantuense (De Wild.)j.Leonard 82 Hylodendron gabunense Taub. 82 - macrantha Harv. 275
Englerodendmn usambarensis Harms 102 - mildbraedii (Harms)Vermoesen 82 Hylodesmum repandurn (Vahl)H.Ohashi & RR.Mill 441 Lebruniodendron leptanthum (Harms)].Leonard 87
Entada polystachya (L.)DC. 169 - pierreanum (Harms)].Leonard 82 Hymenaea courbaril L. 80 Lecointea amazonica Ducke 223
Enterolobium cyclocaipwn Qacq.)Griseb. 212 Gleditsia caspica Desf. 130 - mai1iana Hayne 80 Lem.botropis nigricans (L.)Griseb. 293
- schomburgkii (Benth.)Benth. 212 - japonica Miq. 130 - verrucosa Gaertn. 80 Lemurodendron capuronii Villers & P.Guinet 171
Eperuafalcata Aubl. 78 Gliricidia brenningii (Harms)Lavin 466 Hymenocarpos circinnatus (L.)Savi 459 Lemuropisum edule H.Perrier 156
- grandiflora (Ducke)R.S .Cowan 78 - sepium Qacq.)Walp. 468 Hymenolobium alagoanum Ducke var. a!agoanum 310 Lennea melanocaipa Vatke 468
- jenmanii Oliv. subsp. sandwithii RS.Cowan 78 Glycine max (L.)Merr. 421 Hymenostegia afzelii (Oliv.)Harms 94 Lens culinaris Medik. 506
Eremosparton aphyllum (Pall.)Fisch. & C.A.Mey. 483 Glycyrrhiza lepidota Pursh 478 - floribunda (Benth.)Harms 94 Leonardoxa afi'icana (Baill.)Aubrev. 95
Erichsenia uncinata Hems!. 342 Gompholobium capitatum A.Cunn. 353 - normandii Pellegr. 94 Leptoden'is nobilis (Welw. ex Baker)Dunn 372
Erinacea anthyllis Link 294 - minus Sm. 340 Hypocalyptus oxalidifolius (Sims)Baill. 337 Leptodesmia spp. 445
Eriosema psoraleoides (Lam.)G .Don 411 - tomentosurn Labill. 340 - sophoroides (P.].Bergius)Baill. 337 Leptosema aphyllum (Hook.)Crisp 344
- robinsonii Verde. 411 Goniorrhachis marginata Taub. 73 - daviesioides (Turcz.)Crisp 353
Erophaca baetica Boiss. 480 Gonocytisus pterocladus (Boiss.)Spach 294 Jcuria dunensis Wieringa 107 - tomentosum (Benth.)Crisp 353
Errazurizia megaectrpa l.M.Johnst. 302 Goodia lotifolia Salisb. 356 Indigastrum fastigiatum (E.Mey.)Schrire 362 Lespedeza formosa (Vogel) Koehne 432
E1ythrina madagascai'iensis Du Puy & Labat 413 Gossweilerodendron balsamiferum (Vermoesen)Harms 75 Indigo/era bosse1'i Du Puy & Labat 364 - maximowiczii C.K.Schneid. 435
- peruviana Krukoff 413 Grazielodendron rio-docense H.C.Lima 326 - colutea (Burm.f.)Merr. 364 - thunbergii (DC.)Nakai 435
Erythrophleum couminga Bail!. 157 Griffonia physocaipa Bail!. 60 - heterantha Wall. ex Brandis 365 Lessertia lanata Harv. 484
- lasianthum Corbishley 157 Gueldenstaedtia multiflora Bunge 479 - hochstetteri Baker 364 - m.iniata TM.Salter 484
Erythrostemon (Caesalpinia) calycina (unpublished Guibourtia coleosperma (Benth.)J. Leonard 81 - pendula Franch. 360 Leucaena trichodes Qacq.)Benth. 174
combination) 141 - schleibenii (Harms)].Leonard 81 Indopiptadenia oudhensis (Brandis)Brenan 170 Leucochloron limae Barneby &J.W.Grimes 206
- gilliesii Klotzsch 141 Guilandina bonduc L. 143 Inga feuillei DC. 200 Leucomphalos cappa1'ideus Planch. 246
Etaballia dubia (Kunth)Rudd 306, 321 - ciliata Bergius ex Wikstr. 143 - flagelliformis (Vell.)Mart. 200 Leucostegane grandis Prain 86
Euchilopsis lineci1·is (Benth.)F. Muell. 344 Guinetia tehuantepecensis L.Rico & M.Sousa 197 - sapindoides Willd. 200 Libidibia (Caesalpinia) glabrata (unpublished
Eu ch resta f 01·mosana (Ha yata)O hwi 261 Gymnocladus dioiect (L.)K.Koch 130 - sp. aff. densiflora Benth. 213 combination) 144
- horsfieldii (Lesch.)Benn. 261 Inocarpus edulis JR.Forst. & G.Forst. 318 - coriaria Qacq.)Schltdl. 144
- japonica Benth. 261 Haematoxylum brasiletto H.Karst. 135 Intsia bijuga (Colebr. )Kuntze 90, 91 - scleroca1pa (Standl.)Britton & Rose 144
Eurypetalum batesii Baker f. 77 - dinte1'i (Harms)Harms 135 Isoberlinia angolensis (Welw. ex Benth.) Hoyle & Brenan Librevillea klainei (Harms)Hoyle 103
- tessmannii Harms 77 Halirnodendron ai-genteum (Lam.)DC. 491 var. lasiocalyx Hoyle & Brenan 104 Liparia hirsuta Thunb. 270
- unijugum Harms 77 Hammatolobium lotoides Fenzl 465 Isotropis cuneifolia (Sm.)Benth ex Heynh. 342 - splendens (Burm.f.)Bos & De Wit 270
Eutaxia myrtifolia (Sm.)R.Br. 347 - ludovicia Batt. 465 Loesenera gabonensis Pelle gr. 92
Eversmannia subspinosa (Fisch. ex DC.)B.Fedtsch. 492 Hanslia ormocaipoides (DC.)H.Ohashi 437 jacksonia argentea C.A.Gardner 343 - walkeri (A.Chev.)].Leonard 92
Exostyles amazonica Yakovlev 224 Haplormosia monophylla (Harms)Harms 235 - scoparia Smith 343 Lonchocarpus gu.illeminianus (Tul.)Malme 380
- venusta Schott ex Spreng. 224 Hardenbergia violacea (Schneev.)Stearn 406 - sp. aff. angulata Benth. 343 - obtusus Benth. 380
Eysenhardtia orthocarpa S.Watson 303 Hardwickia binata Roxb. 76 jacqueshuberia brevipes Barneby 151 Lophocaipinia aculeatifolia (Burkart)Burkart 146
Harleyodendron unifoliolatum RS.Cowan 223 julbernardia bi'ieyi (De Wild.)Troupin 105 Lotononis corymbosa Benth. 278
Faidherbia albida (Delile)A.Chev. 196 Harpalyce arborescens A.Gray 255 - m.agnifica B.-E.van Wyk 278
Falcatai'ia moluccana (Miq.)Barneby & J.W.Grimes 202 - brasiliana Benth. 255 Kalappia celebica Kosterm. 119 Lotus aduncus (Griseb.)Nyman 463
Fiebrigiella gracilis Harms 324 - sp. 255 Kana/oa kahoolawensis Lorence & K.R.Wood 176 - benholetii Masf. 454
Fillaeopsis discophom Hanns 171 Havardia campylacantha CL.Rico & M.Sousa) Barneby & Kebirita roudairei (Bonnet)Kramina & D.D.Sokoloff 461 - corniculatus L. 463
Fissicalyxfendle1'i Benth. 324 J.W.Grimes 208 Kennedia beckxiana F. Muell. 406 - maculatus Breitf. 463
Flemingia strobilifera (L.)W.T.Aiton 413 Hebestigma cubense (Kunth)Urb . 468 - nig1'icans Lindi. 406 Luetzelburgia auriculata (Allemao)Ducke 234
Fordia albiflora (Prain)Dasuki & Schot 374 Hedysantm varium Willd. 493 Kingiodendron alternifolium (Elmer)Merr. & Rolfe 75 Lupinus conicus C.P.Sm. 288
Hegnera obcordata (Miq.)Schindl. 441 Koompassia malaccensis Benth. 117 - mutabilis Sweet 288
Gagnebina pterocarpa (Larn.)Baill. 176 Herpyza grandiflora (Griseb.)C.Wright 417 Kotschya africana Encll. var. bequaertii (De Wild.)Verdc. - pilosus Murray 287
Galactia jussiaeana Kunth 398 Hesperalbizia occidentalis (Brandegee)Barneby & 331 - p1'incei Harms 288
Galega battiscombei (Baker f.)J.B.Gillett 487 J.W.Grimes 210 - pe1·rieri (R.Vig.)Verdc. 331 - tauris Benth. 287
Abarema Pittier 15, 48, 193, 204, 205 - elaphroxylon (Guill. & Perr.) Taub. 329
Abarema alliance 195 - subgen. Aeschynomene 329
Abreae (Wight & Am. ex End!.) Hutch. 5, 9, 122, 361, 367, - subgen. Ochopodium (Vogel) ].Leonard 327, 328, 329
389, 393, 394, 505 - subgen. Rueppellia (A.Rich.) ].Leonard 329
Abrus Adans. 17, 51, 390, 505 Aeschynomeneae (Benth.) Hutch. 4, 8, 307, 308
- melanospermus Hassk. subsp. tenuiflorus (Benth.) D. Ajfonsea A.St.-Hil. 193, 200
Harder 389 Afgekia Craib 17, 371
- precatorius L. 122, 390 African 'arid corridor' 24, 43
- pulchellus Wall. ex Thwaites subsp. tenuiflorus (Bentb.) Afrormosia Harms 236
Verde. 389 Afzelia Sm. 13, 34, 69, 90, 91, 92
Acacia coulteri Group 187 Aganope Miq. 17, 373, 382
Acacia Mill. 10, 12, 15, 163, 187, 188, 212 Agati Adans. 453
- albida Del. 196 Airyantha Brummitt 15, 245, 246
- dealbata Link 189 Akschindlium H.Ohashi 9, 18, 439
- coulteri Benth. 187 - godefroyanum (Kuntze) H.Ohashi 439
- farnesiana (L.) Willd. 189 Alantsilodendron Villiers 6, 14, 163, 177
- mangium Willd. 189 Albizia Durazz. 3, 12, 15, 48, 193, 201, 205, 207, 211
- mearnsii De Wild. 189 - julibrissin Durazz. 211
- nilotica (L.) Willd. 188 - lebbeck (L.) Benth. 211
- senegal (L.) Willd. 189 Albizzia Benth. 211
- sens. lat. 3, 187, 193 Aldina End!. 15, 221
- sens. strict. 187 - heterophylla Spruce ex Benth. 221
- subgen. Acacia 6, 31, 187 Aldinoid clade 5, 7, 216, 228
- subgen. Aculeiferum 187 Alexa Moq. 5, 7, 15, 229
- subgen. - sect. Aculeiferum sens. strict. 187 - imperatricis (R.H.Schomb.) Baill. 229
- subgen. - sect. Filicinae (Benth.) Taub. 187 A lexandra R.H.Schomb. 229
- subgen. Phyllodineae 5, 6, 48, 187, 193 Alhageae (DC.) Burnett 489
Acacieae Dumort. 5, 6, 15, 22, 48, 163, 187, 193, 196 Alhagi Gagnebin 9, 19, 476, 489, 492
Acaciella Britton & Rose 187, 188 - graecomm Boiss. 492
Acanthonotus Benth. 364 Alhagiinae DC. 9
Acmispon Raf. 9, 19, 53, 462, 463 Alistilus N.E.Br. 18, 423
Acmispon sensu auct., pro parte non Raf 461 Alloburkillia Whitmore 377
Acosmium Schott 5, 15, 31, 36, 49, 236, 240 Almaleea Crisp & P.H.Weston 17, 346, 347
- panamense (Benth.) Yakovlev 236 Alvesia Welw. 61
Acrocarpus group 127, 128 Alysicarpus Desv. 19, 444
Acrocarpus Wight & Arn. 14, 24, 47, 111, 127, 131, 132, - subgen. Desmodiastrum Schindl. 444
133 Amaria Mutis 61
- fraxinifolius Wight ex Arn. 133 Amblygonocarpus Harms 14, 167
Adenanthera group 6, 163, 164, 165, 168 - andongensis (Oliv.) Exel! & Torre 167
Adenanthera L. 14, 47, 48, 167 Amburana Schwacke & Taub. 15, 215, 220
- pavonina L. 167 - cearensis (Allemao) A.C.Sm. 220
Adenanthereae (Benth.) Benth. & Hook.f 163 Amerimnon P.Browne 327
Adenocarpinae Rouy 284 Amherstia group 69
Adenocarpus DC. 16, 279, 283, 284, 289, 290 Amherstia Wall. 13, 69, 95
Adenodolichos Harms 18, 52, 408 - nobilis Wall. 95
Adenolobus (Harv. ex Benth. & Hook.f.) Torre & Hille. 13, Amherstieae Benth. 69
24, 31, 45, 57, 59, 60 Amherstieae clade 71
Adenopodia C.Presl 14, 182 Amicia Kunth 16, 312, 313
Adesmia clade 5, 8, 50, 308, 309 - zygomeris DC. 312
Adesmia DC. 3, 16, 36, 50, 307, 312 Ammodendron Fisch. ex DC. 15, 242, 279
- loto ides Hook.f. 312 - argenteum Kuntze 242
Adesmieae (Bentb.) Hutch. 4, 8, 36, 307 Ammopiptanthus S.H.Cheng 16, 263, 264
Adinobotrys Dunn 370 - mongolicus (Maxim. ex Korn.) Cheng 264
Aenictophyton A.T.Lee 17, 355, 358 Ammothamnus Bunge 7, 15, 242
Aeschynomene L. 3, 10, 17, 50, 329, 330 Amoria C.Presl 499, 501
- aspera L. 329 Amorpha L. 16, 50, 299, 301, 302