Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/324280105
CITATIONS READS
10 17,024
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by André Didierjean on 27 June 2018.
Sommaire.......................................................................................... 7
Préface............................................................................................... 9
Avant-propos..................................................................................... 13
2. L’attention.................................................................................. 58
2.1. L’attention sélective............................................................... 59
2.1.1. La théorie du filtre sélectif................................................... 60
2.1.2. La théorie de l’atténuation.................................................. 63
2.1.3. La théorie de la sélection tardive.......................................... 64
2.1.4. Conclusion sur l’attention sélective........................................ 65
2.2. L’allocation des ressources attentionnelles.............................. 66
2.2.1. Distribution des ressources attentionnelles............................. 67
2.2.2. Automatisation des processus cognitifs.................................. 69
3. Conclusions................................................................................. 71
5. Conclusion.................................................................................. 190
Glossaire............................................................................................ 371
Bibliographie...................................................................................... 383
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory. Theory Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S. & Camos, V. (2004).
and practice. Boston: allyn and Bacon. Trad. Time constraints and resource-sharing in
fr. sous la direction de S. Hollard, La mémoire adults’ working memory spans. Journal of
humaine: théorie et pratique. Grenoble: PUG, Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83‑100.
1993. Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2006). La cognition
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. mathématique chez l’enfant. Marseille: Solal.
Science, 255(5044), 556‑559. Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2012). As time
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A goes by: Temporal constraints in working
new compornent of working memory. Trends memory. Current Direction in Psychological
in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417‑423. Science, 21, 413‑419.
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, Barrouillet P. & Camos, V. (2014). Attentional and
thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford Univer- non-attentional systems in the maintenance of
sity Press. verbal information in working memory: The
Baddely, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theo- executive and phonological loops. Frontiers in
ries, models, and controversies. Annual Human Neuroscience, 9, 900.
Review of Psychology, 63, 1‑29. Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2015). Working
Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working Memory: Loss and Reconstruction. Hove: Psy-
memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The pschology chology Press.
of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). London: Barrouillet, P. & Thevenot, C. (2013). On the pro-
Academic Press. blem size effect in small additions: Can we
Baddeley, A. D. & Liberman, K. (1980). Spa- really discard any counting-based account?
tial working memory. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Cognition, 128, 35‑44.
Attention and Performance (Vol. 8). Hillsdale, Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: a study in
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. experimental and social psychology. New
Bago, B. & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic? Exa- York: Macmillan.
mining the time course assumption of dual Bates, E., Masling, M. & Kintsch, W. (1978).
process theory. Cognition, 158, 90‑109. Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue.
Ball, L. J. & Thompson, V. A. (Eds.) (2018). Inter‑ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
national handbook of thinking and reasoning. Learning and Memory, 4, 187‑197.
London: Psychology Press. Bauer, P. J. & Mandler, J. M. (1989). Taxonomies
Bara, B. G., Bucciarelli, M. & Johnson, L. P. N. and triads: Conceptual organization in one-
(1995). Development of syllogistic reaso- to two-year-olds. Cognitive Psychology, 21,
ning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 156‑184.
157‑193. Beal, C. R. (1990). The development of text eva-
Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E. & Kozlowski, L. T. luation and revision skills. Child Develop‑
(1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait ment, 61, 247‑258.
perception that influence gender recognition. Begg, I. & Denny, J. P. (1969). Empirical reconci-
Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 145‑152. liation of atmosphere and conversion inter-
Barnard, P. J. (1985). Interactive cognitive sub- pretations of syllogistic reasoning errors.
systems: A psycholinguistic approach to Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81,
short-term memory. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress 351‑354.
in the Psychology of Language (pp. 197‑258). Benton, S. L., Kraft, R. G., Glover, J. A. & Plake,
London: Erlbaum. B. S. (1984). Cognitive capacity differences
Barnard, P. J. (1987). Cognitive resources and among writers. Journal of Educational Psy‑
the learning of human-computer dialogs. In chology, 76, 820‑834.
J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing Thought: Cogni‑ Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psy‑
tive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction chology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ:
(pp. 112‑158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understan- production. Journal of Memory and Lan‑
ding: Recent research and a theory. Compu‑ guage, 31, 99‑127.
ter Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Bock, K. & Levelt, W. (1994). Language produc-
32, 29‑73. tion: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gern-
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-compo- bacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics.
nents: A theory of human image understan- San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
ding. Psychological Review, 94, 115‑117. Bock, K. & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agree-
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L. & Stacy, E. W. (1973). ment. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45‑93.
Searching for objects in real-world scenes. Bonati, L. (1994a). Propositional reasoning by
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, model? Psychological Review, 101, 725‑733.
22‑27.
Bonatti, L. (1994b). Why should we abandon
Bigand, E. & Pineau, M. (1996). Context effects the mental logic hypothesis? Cognition, 50,
on melody recognition: A dynamic interpre- 17‑39.
tation. Current Psychology of Cognition, 15,
Bonin, P. (2013). Psychologie du langage. La
121‑134.
fabrique des mots. Approche cognitive
Bigand, E. & Pineau, M. (1997). Global context (2e éd.). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
effects on musical expectancy. Perception
Bonin, P. & Fayol, M. (1996). L’étude en temps
and Psychophysics, 59, 1098‑1107.
réel de la production du langage écrit, pour-
Bilalić, M., McLeod, P. & Gobet, F. (2008). Why quoi et comment. Études de linguistique appli‑
good thoughts block better ones: The mecha- quée, 101, 8‑19.
nism of the pernicious einstellung effect.
Bonin, P., Fayol, M. & Gombert, J. E. (1997). Role
Cognition, 108, 652‑661.
of phonological and orthographic codes in
Bilalić, M.,McLeod, P. & Gobet, F. (2008). picture naming and writing: An interference
Inflexibility of experts – reality or myth? paradigm study. Current Psychology of Cogni‑
Quantifying the einstellung effect in chess tion, 16, 299‑324.
masters. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 73‑102.
Bonnardel, N. (2006). Créativité et conception.
Bjorklund, D. F. & Bjorklund, B. R. (1985). Orga- Approches cognitives et ergonomiques. Mar-
nization versus item effects of an elaborated seille: Solal.
knowledge base on children’s memory. Deve‑
Bonnardel, N. (2009). Activités de conception et
lopmental Psychology, 21, 1120‑1131.
créativité: De l’analyse des facteurs cognitifs
Blanc, N. & Brouillet, D. (2003). Mémoire et com‑ à l’assistance aux activités de conception
préhension. Clamecy: In Press Éditions. créatives. Le Travail humain, 72, 5‑22.
Blättler, C., Ferrari, V., Didierjean, A. & Bonnardel, N. & Didier, J. (2016). Enhancing crea-
Marmèche, E. (2013). L’extrapolation du
tivity in the educational design context: An
mouvement (Representational Momentum) exploration of the effects of design project-
dans les scènes visuelles dynamiques. L’An‑ oriented methods on students’ evocation pro-
née psychologique, 113, 95‑123. cesses and creative output. Journal of Cognitive
Blaye, A. & Lemaire, P. (2007). Psychologie du Education and Psychology, 15, 80‑101.
développement cognitif de l’enfant. Bruxelles: Bonnardel, N., Forens, M. & Lefevre, M. (2016).
De Boeck. Enhancing collective creative design: An
Bobrow, S. A. & Bower, G. H. (1969). Com- exploratory study on the influence of static
prehension and recall of sentences. Journal and dynamic personas in a virtual environ-
of Experimental Psychology, 80, 455‑461. ment. Design Journal, 19, 221‑235.
Bock, K. (1996). Language production: Methods Bonnefon, J.-F. (2011). Le raisonneur et ses
and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin and modèles. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de
Review, 3, 395‑421. Grenoble.
Bock, K. & Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating men- Bonnefon, J.-F., Hopfensitz, A. & De Neys, W. (2013).
tal energy: Performance units in language The modular nature of trustworthiness
discourse processing. Annual Review of Psy‑ Chekaf, M., Cowan, N. & Mathy, F. (2016). Chunk
chology, 46, 91‑100. formation in immediate memory and how it
Carroll, M. V., Byrne, B. & Kirsner, K. (1985). relates to data compression. Cognition, 155,
Autobiographical memory and perceptual 96‑107
learning: A developmental study using Chen, Z. & Cowan, N. (2009). Core verbal wor-
picture recognition, naming latency, and king memory capacity: The limit in words
perceptual identification. Memory and Cogni‑ retained without covert articulation. Quar‑
tion, 13, 273‑279. terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62,
Castiello, U. & Jeannerod, M. (1991). Measuring 1420‑1429.
time to awareness. Neuroreport, 2, 797‑800. Cheng, P. W. & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic
Caverni, J. P. & Rossi, S. (1997). A nice bit of reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17,
scandal: About a disconfirmation bias in the 391‑416.
Wason’s 2‑4-6 problem. Swiss Journal of Psy‑ Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. & Oli-
chology, 56, 239‑242. ver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic
Caverni, J. P., Rossi, S. & Péris, J. L. (2000). The approaches to training deductive reasoning.
alternatives taken into account in hypotheses Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293‑328.
testing: Two new paradigms for investigating Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the
strategies In J. A. Garcia-Madruga, N. Carriedo recognition of speech, with one and with
& M. J. Gonzalez-Labra (Eds.), Mental Model two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
Reasoning (pp. 133‑141). Madrid: UNED. America, 25, 975‑979.
Ceci, S. J. & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility Cherubini, P., Castelvecchio, E. & Cherubini,
of the child witness: A historical review A. M. (2005). Generation of hypotheses in
and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, Wason’ 2‑4-6 task: An information theory
403‑439. approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F. & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Sug- Psychology Section A – Human Experimental
gestibility of children’s memory: Psycholegal Psychology, 58, 309‑332.
implications. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑ Chi, M. T. H. & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-sol-
logy: General, 116, 38‑49. ving ability. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Human
Ceraso, J. & Provitera, A. (1971). Sources of abilities: An information processing approach
error in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Psy‑ (pp. 227‑248). New York: Freeman.
chology, 2, 400‑410. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The
Chan, J. C. K. & LaPaglia, J.A. (2013). Impai- Hague: Mouton.
ring existing declarative memory in humans Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syn‑
by disrupting reconsolidation. Proceedings tax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, Chomsky, N. (1981). Knowledge of language:
9409‑9313. Its elements and origins. Philosophical Tran‑
Chanquoy, L. & Negro, I. (1996). Subject-verb sactions of the Royal Society of London,
agreement errors in written productions: A 295(1077, Series B), 223‑234.
study of French children and adults. Journal Christensen, S. J. J. & Beach, L. R. (1984). The
of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 553‑570. citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judg-
Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J. N. & Fayol, M. (1990). ment and decision literature. American Psy‑
Temporal management of short text writing chologist, 39, 75‑78.
by children and adults. Cahiers de psychologie Christopher, M.E. et al., (2012). Predicting word
cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, reading and comprehension with executive
10, 513‑540. function and speed measures across deve-
Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. (1959). Atmos- lopment: A latent variable analysis. Journal
phere effect re-examined. Journal of Experi‑ of Experimental Psychology: General, 141,
mental Psychology, 58, 220‑226. 470‑488.
Chrostowski, J. J. & Griggs, R. A. (1985). The Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1970). Does cate-
effects of problem content, instructions, and gory size affect categorization time? Journal
verbalization procedure on Wason’s selec- of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9,
tion task. Current Psychological Research and 432‑438.
Reviews, 4, 99‑107. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon,
Clark, H., H., Chase, W. G. (1972). On the pro- R. & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual-route
cess of comparing sentence against pictures. cascaded model of visual word recognition
Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472‑517. and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108,
Clarke-Stewart, A., Thompson, W. & Lepore, 204‑256
S. (1989). Manipulating children’s interpreta- Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G. & Titone, D. (1993).
tions through interrogation. Paper presented Do the beginnings of spoken words have
at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for a special status in auditory word recogni-
Research on Child Development, Kansas City, tion? Journal of Memory and Language, 32,
MO. 193‑210.
Cleeremans, A. & Content, A. (1997). Current Conrad, C. (1972). Cognitive economy in seman-
directions in implicit learning: Where is it tic memory. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
that we were suppose to go again? Psycholo‑ chology, 92, 149‑154.Conrad, R. (1964).
gica Belgica, 37, 1‑7. Acoustic confusions in immediate memory.
Cleeremans, A. & French, R. M. (1996). From British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75‑84.
chicken squawking to cognition: Levels of Conrad, R. & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information,
description and the computational approach acoustic confusion and memory span. British
in psychology. Psychologica Belgica, 36, 5‑29. Journal of Psychology, 55, 429‑432.
Clément, E. (2006). Approche de la flexibilité Content, A. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (1996). On
cognitive dans la problématique de la réso- the need for computer modeling: The case
lution de problème. L’Année psychologique, of language processing. Psychologica Belgica,
106, 415‑434. 36, 113‑144.
Cohen, G. & Faulkner, D. (1983). Age differences Cooper, L. A. & Shepard, R. N. (1973). The time
in performance on two information-proces- required to prepare for a rotated stimulus.
sing tasks: Strategy selection and proces- Memory and Cognition, 1, 246‑250.
sing efficiency. Journal of Gerontology, 38, Cooper, J. A., Worthy, D. A., Gorlick, M. A. & Mad-
447‑454. dox, W. T. (2013). Scaffolding across the lifes-
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K. & McClelland, J. L. pan in history-dependent decision making.
(1990). On the control of automatic pro- Psychology and Aging, 28, 505‑514.
cesses: A parallel distributed processing Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model
account of the Stroop effect. Psychological of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah
Review, 97, 332‑361. (Eds.), Models of Working Memory
Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Laueys, S., (pp. 62‑101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
Delfiore, G., Degueldre, C., Luxen, A., et al. University Press.
(2005). Exploring the unity and diversity of Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in
the neural substrates of executive functio- short-term memory: A reconsideration of
ning. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 409‑423. mental storage capacity. Behavioural and
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading- Brain Sciences, 24, 87‑114.
activation theory of semantic processing. Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four:
Psychological Review, 82, 407‑428. How is working memory capacity limited,
Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrie- and why? Current Directions in Psychological
val time from semantic memory. Journal Sciences, 19, 51‑57.
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, Cowan, N. (2016). Working memory capacity.
240‑247. New York, Routledge [Original Edition
2005]: Psychology Press and Routledge Clas- Daneman, M. & Green, I. (1986). Individual dif-
sic Edition. ferences in comprehending and producing
Cowart, W. (1982). Autonomy and interaction words in context. Journal of Memory and
in the language processing system: A reply Language, 25, 1‑18.
to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler. Cognition, 12, Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Wor-
109‑117. king memory and language comprehension:
Cowley, M. & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Chess A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulle‑
master’s hypothesis testing. Proceedings of tin & Review, 3, 422‑433.
the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference of the Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T. & Crowder, R. C.
Cognitive Science Society (pp. 250‑255). New (1972). An auditory analogue of the Sper-
York: Psychology Press. ling partial report procedure: Evidence for
Craik, F. I. M. (1971). Age differences in recogni- brief auditory storage. Cognitive Psychology,
tion memory. Quaterly Journal of Experimen‑ 3, 255‑267.
tal Psychology, 23, 316‑323. De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for
Craik, F. I. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychologi‑
of processing: A framework for memory cal Science, 7, 28‑38.
research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Ver‑ De Neys, W. (2014). Conflict detection, dual
bal Behavior, 11, 671‑684. processes, and logical intuitions: Some clari-
Craik, F. I. & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of proces- fications. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 169‑187.
sing and the retention of words in episodic De Neys, W. & Osman, M. (Eds.) (2013). New
memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: approaches in reasoning research. Hove: Psy-
General, 104, 268‑294. chology Press.
Craik, F. I. & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of De Neys, W. & Bonnefon, J. F. (2013). The whys
rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of and whens of individual differences in thin-
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, king biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17,
599‑607. 172‑178.
Crowder, R. (1982). A common basis for audi- De Neys, W., Schaeken, W. & d’Ydewalle,
tory sensory storage in perception and
G. (2005). Working memory and everyday
immediate memory. Perception & Psychophy‑
conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhi-
sics, 31, 477‑483.
bition of stored counterexamples. Thin‑
Curci, A., Luminet, O., Finkenauer, C. & Gisle, king & Reasoning, 11, 349‑381.
L. (2001). Flashbulb memories in social
De Neys, W., Vartanian, O. & Goel, V. (2008).
groups: A comparative test-retest study
Smarter than we think: When our brains
of the memory of french president Mitte-
detect hat we are biased. Psychological
rand’s death in a French and a Belgian group.
Memory, 9, 81‑101. Science, 19, 483‑489.
Cutting, J. E. & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recogni- De Neys, W., Moyens, E. & Vansteenwegen,
zing friends by their walk: Gait perception D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic
without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psy‑ arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive,
chonomic Society, 9, 353‑356. Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12,
123‑130.
Cutting, J. E., Proffitt, D. R. & Kozlowski, L. T.
(1978). A biomechanical invariant for gait Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence
perception. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑ of particular verbal intrusions in immediate
logy: Human Perception and Performance, 4, recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
357‑372. 58, 17‑22.
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Indivi- Dehaene, S. (2014). Le Code de la conscience,
dual differences in working memory and rea- Paris: Odile Jacob.
ding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., Ritter,
Behavior, 19, 450‑466. F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of
improvement: The power law applies by stra- Didierjean, A. & Nogry, S. (2004). Reducing
tegy within task. Psychological Science, 9, 1‑7. structural-element salience on a source pro-
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory blem produces later success in analogical
of retrieval in sentence production. Psycholo‑ transfer: What role does source difficulty
gical Review, 93, 283‑321. play? Memory & Cognition, 32, 1053‑1064.
Denhière, G. & Deschenes, A. J. (1987). Please Dienes, Z. & Berry, D. C. (1997). Implicit lear-
tell me what you know, I will tell you what ning: Below the subjective threshold. Psycho‑
you can learn. In E. De Corte & H. Lodewijks nomic Bulletin Review, 4, 3‑23.
(Eds.), Learning and instruction: European Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., van der Leij, A. &
research in an international context (Vol. 1). van Baaren, R. B. (2009). Predicting soccer
Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, Inc. matches after unconscious and conscious
Denney, N. W., Pearce, K. A. & Palmer, A. M. thought as a function of expertise. Psycholo‑
(1982). A developmental study of adult’s gical Science, 20, 1381‑1387.
performance on traditional and pratical Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren,
problem-solving tasks. Experimental Aging L. F. & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making
Research, 8, 115‑118. the right choice: The deliberation-without
Desmette, D., Hupet, M., Schelstraete, M.-A. & attention effect. Science, 311, 1005‑1007.
Van der Linden, M. (1995). Adaptation en Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits
langue française du « reading span test » of unconscious thought in preference develop-
de Daneman et Carpenter (1980). L’Année ment and decision making. Journal of Persona‑
psychologique, 95, 459‑482. lity and Social Psychology, 87, 586‑598.
Deutsch, J. A. & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Dijksterhuis, A. & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A
Some theoretical considerations. Psychologi‑ theory of unconscious thought. Perspective in
cal Review, 70, 51‑61. Psychological Sciences, 1, 95‑109.
Didierjean, A. (2015). La madeleine et le savant. Dominowski, R. L. & Ekstrand, B. R. (1967).
Balade proustienne du côté de la psychologie Direct and associative priming in anagram
cognitive. Paris: Le Seuil. solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
Didierjean, A. & Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. 74, 84‑86.
(1997). Eliciting self-explanations improves Dufau, S., Grainger, J. & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). How
problem solving: What processes are to say ‘No’ to a nonword: A leaky compe-
involved? Current Psychology of Cognition, ting accumulator model of lexical decision.
16, 325‑351. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Didierjean, A. & Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. (1998). Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1117‑1128.
Reasoning by analogy: Is it schema-mediated Dulaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski,
or case-based? European Journal of Psycho‑ J. J. & Ritter, F. (1998). The strategy-speci-
logy of Education, 13, 385‑398. fic nature of improvement. The power law
Didierjean, A., Cauzinille-Marmèche, E. & Savina, applies by strategy within task. Psychological
Y. (1999). Learning from examples: Case- Science, 9, 1‑7.
based reasoning in chess for novices. Current Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason:
Psychology of Cognition, 18, 337‑361. Scientific reasoning in real-world laborato-
Didierjean, A., Ferrari, V. & Blättler, C. (2014). ries. In T. B. Ward & S. M. Smith (Eds.), Crea‑
Role of knowledge in motion extrapolation. tive thought: An investigation of conceptual
The relevance of an approach contrasting structures and processes. Washington, D.C.:
experts and novices. The Psychology of Lear‑ American Psychological Association.
ning and Motivation, 61, 215‑235. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line
Didierjean, A. & Gobet, F. (2008). Sherlock creativity and conceptual change in science.
Holmes: An expert’s view of expertise. Bri‑ In R. J. Stenberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The
tish Journal of Psychology, 99, 109‑125. nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fabre, J. M. (1993). Contexte et jugement, de Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E.,
la psychophysique à la responsabilité. Lille: Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M. &
Presses universitaires de Lille. Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Pro-
Fabricius, W. V., Sophian, C. & Wellman, H. M. ject: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French
(1987). Young children’s sensitivity to logical words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior
necessity in their inferential search beha- Research Methods, 42, 488‑496.
vior. Child Development, 58, 409‑423. Ferreira, F. & Clifton, C. (1986). The inde-
Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N. & Cal- pendence of syntactic processing. Journal of
vanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental Memory and Language, 25, 348‑368.
imagery: Dissociable systems of representa- Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case.
tion. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439‑462. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Univer‑
Fayol, M. (1997). Des idées au texte. Paris: Presses sals of linguistic theory. New York: Holt,
universitaires de France. Rinehart & Winston.
Fayol, M. (Ed.) (2002). Production du langage: Fisk, A. D., Derrick, W. L. & Schneider,
traité des sciences cognitives. Paris: Hermès. W. (1986‑1987). A methodological assess-
ment and evaluation of dual-task paradigms.
Fayol, M. & Got, C. (1991). Automatisme et
Current psychological Research and Reviews,
contrôle dans la production écrite: les
5, 315‑327.
erreurs d’accord sujet-verbe chez l’enfant et
l’adulte. L’Année psychologique, 91, 187‑205. Fodor, J. A. (1972). L’explication en psychologie.
Paris: Seghers.
Fayol, M. & Lemaire, P. (1989). Une étude expé-
rimentale du fonctionnement distinctif de la Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cam-
ponctuation dans les phrases. Perspectives bridge, MA: MIT Press.
génétiques. Études de linguistiques appliquées, Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. & Garrett, M. F. (1974).
73, 71‑83. The psychology of language: An introduction
Fayol, M., Hickmann, M., Bonnotte, I. & Gombert, to psycholinguistics and generative gram-
J. E. (1993). The effects of narrative context mar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
on French verbal inflections: A developmen- Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D. & Law, K. (1994).
tal perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based
Research, 22, 453‑478. retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141‑205.
Fayol, M., Largy, P. & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cogni- Ford, M. (1985). Review of mental models. Lan‑
tive overload and orthographic errors: guage, 61, 897‑903.
When cognitive overload enhances subject- Forster, K. I. & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical
verb agreement errors: A study in French access and naming time. Journal of Verbal
written language. Quarterly Journal of Expe‑ Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627‑635.
rimental Psychology: Human Experimental Forster, K. I. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition
Psychology, 47A, 437‑464. priming and frequency attenuation in lexi-
Feigenbaum. E.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984). cal access. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
EPAM·like models of recognition and lear- logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10,
ning. Cognitive Science, 8, 305‑336. 680‑698.
Feist, G. & Gorman, M. (2013). Handbook of the Foss, D. (1998). Two strands of scholarship on
psychology of science. New York: Springer language comprehension: Phoneme monito-
Publishing Company ring and discourse context. Journal of Psy‑
Fernandez, A. & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Chan- cholinguistic Research, 27, 191‑202.
ging environmental context does not reliably Foulin, J. N. & Fayol, M. (1988). Étude en temps
affect memory. Memory and Cognition, 13, réel de la production écrite chez des Enfants
333‑345. de sept et huit ans. / An on-line study of
Ferrand, L. (2007). Psychologie cognitive de la written text production in 7 and 8 year
lecture. Bruxelles: De Boeck. old children. Special Issue: Early literacy.
utterances of child and chimpanzees. Journal Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical
of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12,
244‑267. 306‑355.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema
production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psycho‑ induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive
logy of learning and motivation (Vol. 9). San Psychology, 15, 1‑38.
Diego, CA: Academic Press. Gigerenez, G., Hertwig, R. & Pachur, T. (2011).
Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sen- Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive beha‑
tence production. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker vior. New York: Oxford University Press.
(Eds.), New approaches to language mecha‑ Gilhooly, K. J. (2016). Incubation and Intuition
nisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland. in Creative Problem Solving. Frontiers in
Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sen- Psychology, 7, 1076.
tence production. In B. Butteworth (Ed.), Lan‑ Gilhooly, K. J. (2018). Incubation, problem solving,
guage production: Speech and talk (Vol. 1). and creativity. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson
San Diego, CA: Academic Press. (Eds.), International handbook of thin‑
Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in king and reasoning. London: Psychology
memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6(40). Press.
Geary, C. & Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addi- Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G. J., Garrison, J.,
tion: strategy choice and speed-of-processing Reston, J. & Sirota, M. (2012). Don’t wait to
differences in young and elderly adults. Psy‑ incubate: immediate versus delayed incuba-
chology and Aging, 6, 474‑483 tion in divergent thinking. Memory & Cogni‑
tion, 40, 966‑975.
Gentner, D. & Marvallia, F. (2017). Analogical
Reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G. J., Sirota, M. &
(Eds.), International handbook of thinking and Paphiti-Galeano, A. (2015). Incubation
reasoning. London: Psychology Press. and suppression processes in creative pro-
blem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 21,
George, C. (1997). Polymorphisme du raisonne‑
130‑146.
ment humain. Paris: Presses universitaires
de France. Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. (1989). Mental repre-
sentation and hypothetico-deductive rea-
Geraerts, E., Bernstein, D. M., Merckelbach, H., soning: The case of the THOG problem.
Linders, C., Raymaekers, L. & Loftus, E. F. Psychological Research, 51, 129‑135.
(2008). Lasting false beliefs and their beha-
vioral consequences. Psychological Science, Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. (1993). Naming the
19, 749‑753. parents of the THOG: Mental representation
and reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Expe‑
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years rimental Psychology: Human Experimental
of inconsistent interactions between lexical Psychology, 46A, 701‑713.
familiarity and orthography, concreteness,
Girotto, V. & Light, P. (1992). The pragmatic bases
and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
of children’s reasoning. In P. Light & G. But-
chology: General, 113, 256281.
terworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information of learning and knowing. The developing body
loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, and mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17, 324‑363. Associates, Inc.
Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual Girotto, V., Mazzocco, A. & Tasso, A. (1997).
world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. The effect of premise order in conditional
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as per‑ reasoning: A test of the mental model theory.
ceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Cognition, 63, 1‑28.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in
visual perception. Boston: Hougton Mifflin. recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology
of learning and motivation: Advances in and control strategies on Wason’s 2‑4-6 task.
research and theory (Vol. 5, pp. 129‑193). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
San Diego, CA: Academic Press. logy: Human Experimental Psychology, 36A,
Glanzer, M. & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage 629‑648.
mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Gorman, M. E., Gorman, M. E., Latta, R. M. & Cun-
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351‑360 ningham, G. (1984). How disconfirmatory,
Glass, A. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1975). Alternative confirmatory and combined strategies affect
conceptions of semantic theory. Cognition, group problem solving. British Journal of
3, 313‑339. Psychology, 75, 65‑79.
Glaveanu, V., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, Gorman, M. E., Stafford, A. & Gorman, M. E.
M., de Biaisi, P. M, Desainte-Catherine, M.,… (1987). Disconfirmation and dual hypotheses
& Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: on a more difficult version of Wason’s 2‑4-6
Findings from five creative domains. Fron‑ task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑
chology: Human Experimental Psychology,
tiers in Educational Psychology, 4, 1‑14.
39(1-A), 1‑28.
Glöckner, A. & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-rea-
Graf, P. (1990). Life-span changes in implicit and
son decision making based on automatic
explicit memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic
processing. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
Society, 28, 353‑358.
logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34,
1055‑1075. Graf, P. & Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective
effects of interference on implicit and expli-
Gobet, F. (2011). Psychologie du talent et de l’ex‑
cit memory for new associations. Journal of
pertise. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
Gobet, F. & Clarkson, G. (2004). Chunks in and Cognition, 13, 45‑53.
expert memory: Evidence for the magical
Graf, P., Squire, L. R. & Mandler, G. (1984). The
number four… or is it two? Memory, 12,
information that amnesic patients do not for-
732‑747.
get. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Lear‑
Gobet, F. & Simon, H. A. (1996). The roles of ning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 164‑178.
recognition processes and look-ahead search Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic
in time-constrai- ned expert problem solving: code: An introduction. Language and Cogni‑
Evidence from grand-master-level chess. Psy‑ tive Processes, 23, 1‑35.
chological Science, 7, 52‑55.
Grainger, J. (2017). Orthographic processing: A
Godden, D. R. & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context- ‘mid-level’ vision of reading. The Quarterly
dependent memory in two natural environ- Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1‑25. doi:
ments: On land and underwater. British 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
Journal of Psychology, 66, 325‑331.
Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual
Goel, V. (2007). Anatomy of deductive rea- read-out model of word context effects in
soning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, letter perception: Further investigations of
435‑441. the word superiority effect. Journal of Expe‑
Goldstone, R. L. & Kersten, A. (2003). Concepts rimental Psychology: Human Perception and
and Categories. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Performance, 20, 1158‑1176.
Proctor (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthogra-
psychology. Vol. 4. Experimental psychology phic processing in visual word recognition:
(pp. 591‑621). New York: Wiley. A multiple read- out model. Psychological
Gorman, M. E. (1986). How the possibility of Review, 103, 518‑565.
error affects falsification on a task that Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M. & Segui,
models scientific problem solving. British J. (1989). On the role of competing word
Journal of Psychology, 77, 85‑96. units in visual word recognition: The neigh-
Gorman, M. E. & Gorman, M. E. (1984). A com- borhood frequency effect. Perception and
parison of disconfirmatory, confirmatory Psychophysics, 45, 189‑195.
Greenbaum, J. L. & Graf, P. (1989). Preschool Hartley, A. A. & Anderson, J. W. (1983). Task
period development of implicit and explicit complexity, problem representation, and pro-
remembering. Bulletin of the Psychonomic blem-solving performance by younger and
Society, 27, 417‑420. older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 72‑77.
Greeno, J. G. (1976). Indefinite goals in well- Hartley, A. A. & Anderson, J. W. (1986). Instruc-
structured problems. Psychological Review, tion, induction, generation, and evaluation
83, 479‑491. of strategies for solving search problems.
Greeno, J. G. (1978). Natures of problem-sol- Journal of Gerontology, 41, 650‑658.
ving abilities. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook Hassin, R. R. (2013). Yes it can: On the functional
of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5, abilities of the human unconscious. Perspec‑
pp. 239‑270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. tives in Psychological Science, 8, 195‑207.
Gregory, R. L. (1972). Cognitive contours. Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing
Nature, 238 (5358), 51‑52. research and the writer. American Psycholo‑
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In gist, 41, 1106‑1113.
P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Haygood, R. C. & Bourne, L. E. J. (1965). Attri-
semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York: bute- and rule-learning aspects of conceptual
Seminar Press. behavior. Psychological Review, 72, 175‑195.
Griggs, R. A. (1989). To « see » or not to « see »: Hayward, W. G. & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Testing
That is the selection task. Quarterly Journal conditions for viewpoint invariance in object
of Experimental Psychology: Human Experi‑ recognition. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
mental Psychology, 41 (3-A), 517‑529. logy: Human Perception and Performance, 23,
Griggs, R. A. & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thema- 1511‑1521.
tic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task. Hedden, T. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2010). Shared
British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407‑420. and selective neural correlates of inhibition:
Groome, D. & Eysenck, M. (2016). An introduc‑ Facilitation and shifting processes during
tion to Applied Cognitive Psychology (2nd ed.). executive control. NeuroImage, 51, 421‑431.
New York: Routledge, Psychology Press. Hellyer, S. (1962). Frequency of stimulus pres-
Gulya, M., Rovee-Collier, C., Gallucio, L. & Wilk, entation and short-term decrement in recall.
A. (1998). Memory processing of a serial Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 650.
list by young infants. Psychological Science, Herdman, C. M. (1992). Attentional resource
9, 303‑307. demands of visual word recognition in
Guyote, M. J. & Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A tran- naming and lexical decisions. Journal of Expe‑
sitive-chain theory of syllogistic reasoning. rimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Cognitive Psychology, 13, 461‑525. Performance, 18, 460‑470.
Hakes, D. T. (1972). Effects of reducing comple- Herdman, C. M. & Dobbs, A. R. (1989). Atten-
ment constructions on sentence comprehen- tional demands of visual word recognition.
sion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Behavior, 11, 278‑286. Perception and Performance, 15, 124‑132.
Hakes, D. T. & Foss, D. J. (1970). Decision pro- Heurley, L. (1997). Processing units in written
cesses during sentence comprehension: texts: Paragaphs or information blocks?
Effects of surface structure reconsidered. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Pro‑
Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 413‑416. cessing interclausal relationships: Studies in
Harley, T. (1995). The psychology of language. the production and comprehension of text
From data to theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (pp. 179‑200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-
Harman, M. & Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and baum Associates.
suppression: Memory for previously rele- Higham, P. A. (1998). Believing details known
vant information. Psychology and Aging, 6, to have been suggested. British Journal of
584‑587. Psychology, 89, 265‑283.
Hirst, W. et al. (2009). Long-Term Memory for Howard, D. V., Heisey, J. G. & Shaw, R. J. (1986).
the terrorist attack of September 11: Flash- Aging and the priming of newly learned
bulb memories, event memories, and the fac- associations. Developmental Psychology, 22,
tors that influence their retention. Journal 78‑85.
of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, Howe, M. L. & Rabinowitz, F. M. (1989). On the
161‑176. uninterpretability of dual-task performance.
Hoch, S. J. & Tschirgi, J. E. (1985). Logical Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47,
knowledge and cue redundancy in deduc- 32‑38.
tive reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 13, Howes, D. H. & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual
453‑462. duration threshold as a function of word-
Hockett, C. F. (1963). The problem of univer- probability. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
sals in language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), logy, 41, 401‑410.
Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: Hoyer, W. J., Rebok, G. W. & Sved, S. M. (1979).
MIT Press. Effects of varying irrelevant information
Hodzik, S. & Lemaire, P. (2011). Inhibition and on adult age differences in problem solving.
shifting capacities mediate adults’ age-rela- Journal of Gerontology, 14, 553‑560.
ted differences in strategy selection and Hubbard, T. L. (2015). The varieties of momen-
repertoire. Acta Psychologica, 137, 335‑344. tum-like Experience. Psychological Bulletin,
Hoffman, D. D. & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts 141, 1081‑1119.
of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65‑96. Hummel, J. E. & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distribu-
Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J. & O’Rourke, T. (2002). ted representations of structure: A theory of
An electrophysiological study of the effects analogical access and mapping. Psychological
of orthographic neighborhood size on prin- Review, 104, 427‑466.
ted word perception. Journal of Cognitive
Hupet, M., Schelstraete, M. A., Demaeght, N. &
Neuroscience, 14, 938‑950.
Fayol, M. (1996). Les erreurs d’accord sujet-
Hollingworth, A., Maxcey-Richard, verbe en production écrite. L’Année psycho‑
A. M. & Vecera, S. P. (2012). The spatial distri- logique, 96, 587‑610.
bution of attention within and across objects.
Hyde, T. S. & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall for
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
words as a function of semantic, graphic, and
Perception & Performance, 38, 135‑151.
syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal
Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (2005). The Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 471‑480.
Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reaso‑
ning. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Hyman, I. E., Jr., Husband, T. H. & Billings, J. F.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1995). False memories of childhood expe-
riences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9,
Houdé, O. & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an 181‑197.
inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning
brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Intraub, H. (2004). Anticipatory spatial repre-
148. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148 sentation of 3D regions explored by sighted
observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer.
Houdé, O., Zago, L., Moutier, S., Crivello, F.,
Cognition, 94, 19‑37.
Mellet, E., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B. & Tzou-
rio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Can emotions help Intraub, H. (2012). Rethinking visual scene
us reason? Two positron emission tomogra- perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:
phy (PET) studies using a training paradigm. Cognitive Science, 3, 117‑127.
Brain and Cognition, 51, 233‑234. Intraub, H. & Dickinson, C. (2008). False memory
Howard, D. V. (1988). Implicit and explicit assess- 1/20th of a second later. Psychological
ment of cognitive aging. In M. L. Howe & Science, 19, 1007‑1014.
C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive development in Intraub, H., Gottesman, C. V. & Bills, A. J.
adulthood: Progress in cognitive development (1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining
research. New York: Springer-Verlag. scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of
Keeney, R. L. & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Kirk, E. P. & Ashcraft, M. K. (2001). Telling sto-
multiple objectives: Preferences and value ries: The perils and promise of using verbal
tradeoffs. New York: Cambridge University reports to study math strategies. Journal of
Press. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and and Cognition, 27, 157‑175.
writing performance: Effects of rough draft Klauer, K. C. (2004). Double dissociations in
and outline strategies. Journal of Experimen‑ visual and spatial short-term memory. Jour‑
tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni‑ nal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133,
tion, 14, 355‑365. 355‑381.
Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Klayman, J. & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirma-
New York: Oxford University Press. tion, disconfirmation, and information in
Khemlani, S. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2012). Theo- hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94,
ries of syllogism: A meta-analysis. Psycholo‑ 211‑228.
gical Bulletin, 138, 422‑457. Klein, G. A. (2009). Sources of power: How people
Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
of Psychology, 43, 711‑742. Kohn, S. E. & Friedman, R. B. (1986). Word-
Kinstch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm meaning deafness: A phonological-semantic
for cognition. New York: Cambridge Univer- dissociation. Journal of Cognitive Neuropsy‑
sity Press. chology, 3, 291‑308.
Kintsch, W. & Mangalath, P. (2011) The construc- Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M. & Reiser, B. J. (1978).
tion of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, Visual images preserve metric spatial infor-
3, 346‑370. mation: Evidence from studies of image
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of mea‑ scanning. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
ning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- logy: Human Perception and Performance, 4,
baum, Inc. 47‑60.
Kintsch, W. (1992). A cognitive architecture for Kotovsky, K. & Simon, H. A. (1973). Empirical
comprehension. In H. L. J. Pick, P. W. van den tests of a theory of human acquisition of
Broek & D. C. Knill (Eds.), Cognition: Concep‑ concepts for sequential patterns. Cognitive
tual and methodological issues. Washington, Psychology, 4, 399‑424.
D.C.: American Psychological Association. Kounios, J. & Beeman, M. (2015). The Eureka
Kintsch, W. (1994). The psychology of discourse Factor: AHA Moments, Creative Insight, and
processing. In M. A. Gernbacher (Ed.), Hand‑ the Brain. New York, NY: Random House.
book of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Aca- Kvavilashvili, L., Mirani, J., Schagman, S., Foley,
demic Press, Inc. K. & Kornbrot, D.E. (2009). Consistency of
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm flashbulb memories of September 11 over
for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer- long delays: Implications for consolidation
sity Press. and wrong slide hypotheses. Journal of
Memory and Language, 61, 556‑572.
Kintsch, W. & Welsch, D. M. (1991). The construc-
tion-integration model: A framework for Lachter, J., Forster, K. I. & Ruthruff, E. (2004).
studying memory for text. In W. E. Hock- Forty-five years after broadbent (1958): Still
ley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory no identification without attention. Psycholo‑
and data: Essays on human memory in honor gical Review, 111, 880‑913.
of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 367‑385). Hill- Lainey, P. (2013). Psychologie de la décision. Mon-
sdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. tréal: EJD.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F. & Largy, P., Fayol, M. & Lemaire, P. (1996). The
Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theo- homophone effect in written French: The
retical analysis. Journal of Memory and Lan‑ case of verb-noun inflection errors. Language
guage, 29, 133‑159. and Cognitive Processes, 11, 217‑255.
Larsen, J. D. Baddeley, A. & Andrade, J. (2000), Lemaire, P., Abdi, H. & Fayol, M. (1996). The
Phonological similarity and the irrelevant role of working memory resources in simple
speech effect: Implications for models of cognitive arith- metic. European Journal of
short-term memory. Memory, 8, 145‑157. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 73‑103.
Lassaline, M. E. & Logan, G. D. (1993). Memory- Lemaire, P., Barrett, S. E., Fayol, M. & Abdi,
based automaticity in the discrimination of H. (1994). Automatic activation of addition
visual numerosity. Journal of Experimental and multiplication facts in elementary school
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, children. Journal of Experimental Child Psy‑
19, 561‑581. chology, 57, 224‑258.
Lemaire, P. (2015). Vieillissement cognitif et Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention
variations stratégiques. Bruxelles: De Boeck. to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(traduction anglaise parue en 2016 chez Tay- Lewis, C. H. & Anderson, J. R. (1976). Interfe-
lor & Francis, Routledge: Psychology Press, rence with real world knowledge. Cognitive
Cognitive Aging: The Role of Strategies). Psychology, 8, 311‑335.
Lemaire, P. (Eds.) (2017). Cognitive Development Lewis, M. Q. & Bartz, W. H. (1970). Learning and
from a strategy perspective. A Festschrift for the memory stores. Journal of Experimental
Robert Siegler. London: Routledge, Psycho- Psychology, 86, 465‑466.
logy Press. Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischloff, B., Layman,
Lemaire, P. (1998). Le vieillissement cognitif. M. & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of
Paris: Presses universitaires de France, coll. lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
« Que sais-je? ». chology: Human Learning and Memory, 4,
Lemaire, P. & Arnaud, L. (2008). Young and 551‑578.
older adults’ strategies in complex arithme- Light, L. L. & Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and
tic. American Journal of Psychology, 121, explicit memory in young and older adults.
1‑16. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Lemaire, P. & Bherer, L. (2005). Psychologie Memory, and Cognition, 13, 531‑541.
du vieillissement. Une perspective cognitive. Light, L. L. & Zelinski, E. M. (1983). Memory for
Bruxelles: De Boeck Université. spatial information in young and old adults.
Lemaire, P. & Fayol, M. (1995). When plausibi- Developmental Psychology, 19, 901‑906.
lity judgments supersede fact retrieval: The Light, L. L., Singh, A. & Capps, J. L. (1986).
example of the odd/even effect on product Dissociation of memory and awareness in
verification. Memory & Cognition, 23, 34‑48. young and older adults. Journal of Clinical
Lemaire, P. & Leclère, M. (2014a). Strategy repe- and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 62‑74.
tition in young and older adults: A study Lindsay, S. (2008). Source monitoring. In H. L.
in arithmetic. Developmental Psychology, 50, Roediger (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory
460‑468. (Vol. 2, pp. 325‑348). Oxford: Elsevier.
Lemaire, P. & Leclère, M. (2014b). Strategy Selec- Lindsay, D. S., Allen, B. P., Chan, J. C. K. & Dahl,
tion in Alzheimer patients: A study in arith- L. C. (2004). Eyewitness suggestibility and
metic. Journal of Experimental and Clinical source similarity: Intrusions of details from
Neuropsychology, 36, 507‑516. one event into memory reports of another
Lemaire, P. & Reder, L. (1999). What affects event. Journal of Memory and Language, 50,
strategy selection in arithmetic? An example 96‑111.
of parity and five effects on product verifica- Linton, M. (1975). Memory for real-world events.
tion. Memory & Cognition, 22, 364‑382. In D. A. Norman & E. D. Rumelhart (Eds.),
Lemaire, P. & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of Explorations in cognition (pp. 376‑404). San
strategic change: Contributions to children’s Francisco: Freeman.
learning of multiplication. Journal of Experi‑ Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Goldinger, S. D.
mental Psychology: General, 124, 83‑97. (1994). Spoken word recognition: Research
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial
previous occurrence. Psychological Review, attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 364‑369.
87, 252271. Massaro, D. W. (1994). Psychological aspects of
Manktelow, K. (2012). Thinking and reasoning: speech perception: Implications for research
An introduction to the psychology of reason, and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),
judgement and decision making. Hove: Psy- Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego,
chology Press. CA: Academic Press.
Maquestiaux, F. (2012). La simultanéité des actes Massol, S., Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M. &
psychiques: apports du protocole PRP. L’An‑ Grainger, J. (2013). Evidence for letter-spe-
née psychologique, 112, 631‑663. cific position coding mechanisms. PLoS ONE,
Maquestiaux, F. (2017). Psychologie de l’attention 8, e68460.
(2e éd.). Bruxelles: De Boeck Université. Massol, S., Grainger, J., Dufau, S. & Holcomb, P. J.
Marcus, S. L. & Rips, L. J. (1979). Conditional (2010). Masked priming from orthographic
reasoning. Journal of Verbal Learning and neighbors: An ERP investigation. Journal of
Verbal Behavior, 18, 199‑223. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, thinking, and cogni‑ and Performance, 36, 162‑174.
tion: A theory of judgment. Chicago, IL: Uni- Masson, G., Proteau, L. & Mestre, D. R. (1995).
versity of Chicago Press. Effects of stationary and moving textured
Markovits, H. & Nantel, G. (1989). The belief- backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual trac-
bias effect in the production and evaluation king in humans. Vision Research, 35, 837‑852.
of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, Mathy, F. (2012). La compression de l’infor-
17, 11‑17. mation dans l’apprentissage de catégories
Markovits, H., Schleifer, M. & Fortier, L. (1989). artificielles. L’Année psychologique, 112,
Development of elementary deductive rea- 593‑629.
soning in young children. Developmental Psy‑ Mathy, F. & Feldman, J. (2012). What’s magic
chology, 25, 787‑793. about magic numbers? Chunking and data
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational inves‑ compression in short-term memory. Cogni‑
tigation into the human representation and tion, 122, 346‑362.
processing of visual information. San Fran- Mathy, F., Fartoukh, M., Gauvrit, N. & Guida,
cisco: Freeman. A. (2016). Developmental abilities of chun-
Marr, D. & Nishihara, K. (1978). Representation king in immediate memory and its non-rela-
and recognition of the spatial organisation tionship to increases in capacity. Frontiers in
of three dimensional shapes. Philosophical Psychology: Cognition, 7, 1‑11.
Transactions of the Royal Society (London), Mauck B. & Dehnhardt G. (1997). Mental rota-
B200, 269‑294. tion in a California sea lion (Zalophus cali-
Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. fornianus). Journal of Experimental Biology,
New York: Cambridge University Press. 200, 1309‑1316.
Marslen-Wilson, W. & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The McCalley, L. T., Bowhuis, D. G. & Juola, J. F.
temporal structure of spoken language (1995). Age changes in the distribution of
understanding. Cognition, 8, 1‑71. visual attention. Journal of Gerontology, 50B,
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Welsh, A. (1978). Pro- 316‑331.
cessing interactions and lexical access during McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactio-
word recognition in continuous speech. nism in language processing. In M. Coltheart
Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29‑63. (Ed.), Attention and Performance (Vol. 12:
Martinez, A., Anilo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Frank, The psychology of reading). Hove, England
L. R., Buxton, R. B., Dubowitz D. J., Wonge, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocates, Inc.
E. C., Hinrichs, H., Heinze, H. J. & Hillyard, McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981).
S. A. (1999). Involvement of striate and An interactive activation model of context
effects in letter perception: I. An account Millis, K. K. & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence
of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, of connectives on sentence comprehen-
375‑407. sion. Journal of Memory and Language, 33,
McCloskey, M. & Santee, J. L. (1981). Are seman- 128‑147.
tic memory and episodic memory distinct Milner, B. (1959). The memory defect in bilateral
systems? Journal of Experimental Psychology: hippocampus lesions. Psychiatric Research
Human Learning and Memory, 7, 66‑71. Reports, 11, 43‑58.
McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1979). Priming in Milner, B., Corsi, P. & Teuber, H. L. (1968). Fur-
episodic and semantic memory. Journal of ther analysis of the hippocampal amnesic
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, syndrome: fourteen year follow-Up study of
463‑480. H. M. Neuropsychologia, 6, 215‑234.
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R. & Dell, G. S. (1986). A Miyake, A. & Friedman, N.P. (2012). The nature
critical evaluation of the semantic-episodic and organisation of individual differences
distinction. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑ in executive functions: Four general conclu-
logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, sions. Current Directions in Psychological
295‑306. Science, 21, 8‑14.
McLeod & P. (1977). A dual-task response Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (1999). Models of Working
modality effect: Support for multiprocessor Memory. New York, NY: Cambridge Univer-
models of attention. Quarterly Journal of sity Press.
Experimental Psychology, 29, 651‑667. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Wit-
Ménétrier, E., Didierjean A. & Marmèche, zki, A. H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T. (2000).
E. (2011). Le système visuel traite-t‑il les The unity and diversity of executive func-
photographies comme des fenêtres ouvertes tions and their contributions to complex
sur le monde? L’Année psychologique, 111, « front lobe » tasks: A latent variable analy-
753‑773. sis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49‑100.
Mestre, D. & Warren, W. H. (1989). Le flux Morawetz, C., Holtz, P., Bauedwig, J., Treue,
optique: son rôle lors du contrôle du déplace- S., Dechent, P. (2007). Split of attentional
ment. / Optical flow: Its role in the control of resources in human visual cortex. Visual
displacement. Psychologie française, 34, 5‑11. Neurosicence, 24, 817‑826.
Metcalfe, J. & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening:
insight and noninsight problem solving. Affective cues and the influence of instruc-
Memory & Cognition, 15, 238‑246. tions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑
Meulemans, T., Van der Linden, M. & Perruchet, chology, 11, 56‑60.
P. (1998). Implicit sequence learning in child- Muller, E., Hollien, H. & Murry, T. (1974). Per-
ren. Journal of Experimental Child Psycho‑ ceptual responses to infant crying: Identifica-
logy, 69, 199‑221. tion of cry types. Journal of Child Language,
Meyer, D. E. & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). 1, 89‑95.
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Murdock, B. B. & Jr (1962). The serial position
Evidence of a depen- dence between retrie- effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental
val operations. Journal of Experimental Psy‑ Psychology, 64, 482‑488.
chology, 90, 227‑234. Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E. & Tweney, R. D.
Meyer, R. E. (2013). Problem solving. In D. Reisberg (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated
(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and research environment: An experimental
reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. study of scientific inference. Quarterly Jour‑
Miller, G. A. (1958). The magic number seven, nal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85‑95.
plus or minus two: Some limits on our capa- Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E. & Tweney, R. D.
city for processing information. Psychological (1978). Consequences of confirmation and
Review, 63, 81‑93. disconfirmation in a simulated research
environment. Quarterly Journal of Experi‑ Newell, H. & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem
mental Psychology, 30, 395‑406. Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice-Hall.
Naccache, L. (2006). Le Nouvel Inconscient: Freud, Newell, A., Shaw, J. C. & Simon, H. A. (1958).
Christophe Colomb des neurosciences, Paris: Elements of a theory of human problem
Odile Jacob. solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151‑166.
Nairne, J. S. (Ed.) (2007), The foundations of Newell, B. R. & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconcious
remembering: Essays in honor of Henry influences on decision making: A critical
L. Roediger, III. New York: Psychology Press. review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37,
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The prece- 1‑64.
dence of global features in visual perception. Nicolas, S. (1992). Hermann Ebbinghaus et l’étude
Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353‑383. expérimentale de la mémoire humaine. L’An‑
Navon, D. (1984). Resources: a theoretical soup née psychologique, 92, 527‑544.
stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216‑234. Nicolas, S. (1994). Réflexions autour du concept
Navon, D. & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy de mémoire implicite. L’Année psychologique,
of the human-processing system. Psychologi‑ 94, 63‑79.
cal Review, 86, 214‑255.
Nicolas, S. (2005). Wundt et la fondation en
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New 1879 de son laboratoire. Histoire documen-
York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. taire de la création et du développement
Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the impor- de l’Institut de psychologie expérimentale
tant questions? In M. M. Gruneberb, P. E. de Leipzig. L’Année psychologique, 105,
Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects 133‑170.
of memory. London: Academic Press. Nicolas, S. (2013). Histoire de la psychologie
Nelson, T. D. (1971). Savings and forgetting from (2e éd.). Paris: Dunod.
long-term memory. Journal of Verbal lear‑
Nicolas, S. (2016). La mémoire. Paris: Dunod.
ning and Memory, 10, 568‑576.
Nicolas, S. & Sanitioso, R. B. (2012). Alfred
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C. & Brysbaert,
M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects Binet and experimental psychology at the
in visual word recognition: New evidence Sorbonne laboratory. History of Psychology,
from the English Lexicon Project. Psychono‑ 15, 328‑363.
mic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45‑52. Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M. & Ferrand, more than we can know: Verbal reports on
L. (2004). Lexique 2: A New French Lexical mental processes. Psychological Review, 84,
Database. Behavior Research Methods, Instru‑ 231‑259.
ments & Computers, 36, 516‑524. Nissen, M. J., Ross, J. L., Willingham, D. B.,
Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions Mackenzie, T. B. & Schacter, D. L. (1994).
with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Evaluating amnesia in multiple personality
Visual information processing. New York, NJ: disorder. In R. M. Klein & B. K. Koane (Eds.),
Academic Press. Psychological concepts and dissociative disor‑
Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cogni‑ ders. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-
tion: The 1987 William James Lectures. Cam- ciates, Inc.
bridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Northcraft, G. B. & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts,
Newell, A. & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mecha- amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-
nisms of skill acquisition and the law of prac- and-adjustment perspective on property pri-
tice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills cing decisions. Organizational Behavior and
and their acquisition (pp. 1‑56). Hillsdale, NJ: Human Decision, 39, 84‑97.
Erlbaum. O’Brien, D. P., Braine, M. D. S. & Yang, Y. (1994).
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1961). Computer Propositional reasoning by mental models?
simulation of human thinking. Science, 134 Simple to refute in principle and in practice.
(2011), 2011‑2017. Psychological Review, 101, 711‑724.
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A. & Clark, J. J. (1999). Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation. Oxford:
Change-blindness as a result of « muds- Oxford University Press.
plashes ». Nature, 398(6722), 34. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual
O’Regan, K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor scenes on the identification of objects.
account of vision and visual consciousness. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519‑526.
Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 24, 939‑1031. Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and
Obusek, C. J. & Warren, R. M. (1973). Relation of the development of automaticity. Journal of
the verbal transformation and the phonemic Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
restoration effects. Cognitive Psychology, 5, and Cognition, 23, 324‑354.
97‑107. Pardilla-Delgado, E. & Payne, J. D. (2017). The
Olive, T. (2014). Toward an incremental and Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task:
cascading model of writing: A review of A simple cognitive paradigm to investigate
research on writing processes coordination. false memories in the laboratory. Journal of
Journal of Writing Research, 6, 173‑194. Visualized Experiments, 119, e54793, doi:
10.3791/54793 (2017)
Olive T. & Barbier, M.-L. (2017a) Effects of a
structured vs linear source text on students’ Parkin, A. J. & Streete, S. (1988). Implicit and
note-taking strategies. Written Communica‑ explicit memory in young children and
tion, 17, 224‑246. adults. British Journal of Psychology, 79,
361‑369.
Olive, T. & Barbier, M.-L. (2017b). Processing
time and cognitive effort of longhand note Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlap-
taking when reading and summarizing a ping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck.
structured or linear text. Written Communi‑ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
cation, 34, 1‑23. Perception and Performance, 10, 358‑377.
Pashler, H. (1993). Dual-task interference and
Olive, T. & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent
elementary mental mechanisms. In D. E.
activation of high- and low-level produc-
Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and
tion processes in written composition.
Performance (Vol. 14: Synergies in experi-
Memory & Cognition, 30, 594‑600
mental psychology, artificial intelligence, and
Olive, T., Piolat, A. & Roussey, J. Y. (1997). Effort cognitive neuroscience). Cambridge, MA:
cognitif et mobilisation des processus en pro- MIT Press.
duction de texte. Effet de l’habileté rédac- Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in
tionnelle et du niveau de compétences. In simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological
D. Mellier & A. Vom Hoffe (dir.), Attention et Bulletin, 116, 220‑244.
contrôle cognitif: Mécanismes, développement
Pashler, H. (1998). The Psychology of Attention.
des habiletés et pathologies (pp. 71‑85). Rouen:
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Publications de l’Université de Rouen.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson,
Pachur, T. & Aebi Forrer, E. (2013). Selection
E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in
of Decision Strategies After Conscious and
decision making. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
Unconscious Thought. Journal of Behavioral
chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14,
Decision Making, 6, 477‑488. doi: 10.1002/ 534‑552.
bdm.1780
Payne, J. W., Samper, A., James Bettman, R. &
Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on
learning and memory. Psychological Review, unconscious thought in complex decision
76, 241‑263. making. Psychological Science, 19, 118‑1123.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1995). Neighbo-
New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. rhood size effect in naming: Lexical acti-
Paivio, A. (1978). Comparisons of mental clocks. vation or sublexical correspondences?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Perception and Performance, 4, 61‑71. Memory and Cognition, 21, 409‑421.
Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1997). Orthographic Piolat, A., Lemaire, P. & Farioli, F. (1997). Stra-
and phonological neighborhoods in naming: tegy selection in orthographic editing. Paper
Not all neighbors are equally influential in presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the
orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Psychonomic Society, Washington, D.C.
Language, 37, 382‑410. Piolino, P., Desgranges, B. & Eustache, F. (2000).
Perruchet, P. & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic La mémoire autobiographique: théorie et pra‑
grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction tique. Marseille: Solal.
or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal Pisoni, D. B. (1978). Speech perception. In
of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and
264‑275.
cognitive processes (Vol. 6, pp. 167‑234). Hill-
Perruchet, P. & Vinter, A. (2002). The self-orga- sdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
nizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain
Pisoni, D. B. & Sawush, J. R. (1975). Some
Sciences, 25, 297‑388.
stages of processing in speech perception. In
Perruchet, P., Frazier, N. & Lautrey, J. (1995). A. Cohen & S. G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure
Conceptual implicity memory: A develop- and process in speech perception (pp. 16‑34).
mental study. Psychological Research, 57, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
220‑228.
Plaut, D. C. (1995). Double dissociation without
Perruchet, P., Gallego, J. & Savy, I. (1990). A cri-
modularity: Evidence from connectionist
tical reappraisal of the evidence for uncons-
neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and
cious abstraction of deterministic rules in
Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 291‑321.
complex experimental situations. Cognitive
Psychology, 22, 493‑516. Poletti, C., Sleimen-Malkoun, R., Decker, L.M.,
Retornaz, F., Lemaire, P., Temprado,
Perruchet, P., Vinter, A. & Gallego, J. (1997).
Implicit learning shapes new conscious per- J. J. (2017). Strategic variations in Fitts’
cepts and representations. Psychonomic Bul‑ task: Comparison of healthy older adults
letin and Review, 4, 43‑48. and cognitively impaired patients. Fron‑
tiers in Aging Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested
fnagi.2016.00334
incremental modeling in the development
of computational theories: the CDP+ model Poletti, C., Sleimen-Malkoun, R., Temprado,
of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, J. J. & Lemaire, P. (2015). Older and youn-
273‑315. ger adults’ strategies in sensori-motor tasks:
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond Insights from Fitts’ pointing task. Journal
single syllables: Large-scale modeling of rea- of Experimental Psychology: Human Percep‑
ding aloud with the Connectionist Dual Pro- tion & Performance, 4, 542‑555.
cess (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, Politzer, G. & Braine, M. D. (1991). Responses
61, 106‑151. to inconsistent premisses cannot count as
Peterson, L. R. & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short- suppression of valid inferences. Cognition,
term retention of individual verbal items. 38, 103‑108.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, Polk, T. A. & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as
193‑198. verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102,
Pineau, M. & Bigand, M. (1997). Effet des struc- 533‑566.
tures globales sur l’amorçage harmonique. Pollack, I. & Pickett, J. M. (1964). Intelligibility
L’Année psychologique, 97, 395‑408. of excerpts from fluent speech: Auditory vs.
Pinker, S. (2009). How the Mind Works structural context. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
(1997/2009). New York, NY: W. W. Nor- ning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 79‑84.
ton & Company. Trad. fr. par M.-Fr. Desjeux, Pollard, P. & Evans, J. S. B. (1980). The influence
Comment fonctionne l’esprit. Paris: Odile Jacob. of logic on conditional reasoning perfor-
Piolat, A. & Pélissier, A. (1998). La rédaction de mance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
textes. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé. Psychology, 32, 605‑624.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The effect for context-consistent and context-
VIIth Sir Frederic Bartlett lecture. Quarterly inconsistent objects. Applied Cognitive Psy‑
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 3‑25. chology, 27, 384‑395.
Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. (1975). Attention Puckett, J. M. & Stockburger, D. W. (1988).
and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Absence of age-related proneness to short-
Information processing and cognition. Hill- term retroactive interference in the absence of
sdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. rehearsal. Psychology and Aging, 3, 324‑347.
Postman, L. & Phillips, L. W. (1965). Short- Pyc, M. A. & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the
term temporal changes in free recall. Quar‑ retrieval effort hypothesis: Does great diffi-
terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, culty correctly recalling information lead do
132‑138. higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory
Postman, L. & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Cri- and Language, 50, 437‑447.
tical issues in interference theory. Pyc, M. A. & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Why is test-
Memory & Cognition, 1(1), 19‑40. restudy practice beneficial for memory? An
Power, M. (1985). Sentence Production and wor- evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
king memory. Quarterly Journal of Experi‑ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
mental Psychology, 37A, 371‑382. Memory, and Cognition, 38, 737‑746.
Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. E., Desmond, J. E., Raven, J. C. (1951). Guide to using progressive
Glover, G. H. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1997). Neu- matrices (1947), Sets A, Ab, B. London:
ral substrates of fluid reasoning: An fMRI Lewis.
study of neocortical activation during per- Rayner, K. et al. (1981). Masking of foveal and
formance of the Raven Progressive Matrices parafoveal vision during eye fixations in
test. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 43‑63. reading. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
Prado, J., Chadha, A. & Booth, J. R. (2011). logy: Human Perception and Performance, 7,
The brain network for deductive reasoning: 167‑179.
A Quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroi- Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology
maging studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuros‑ of reading. London: Prentice-Hall.
cience, 23, 3483‑3497. Rayner, K. & Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye move-
Prado, J., Mutreja, R. & Booth, J. R. (2013). Frac- ments in reading: Psycholinguistic studies.
tionating the neural substrates of transitive In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of
reasoning: task-dependent contributions of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic
spatial and verbal representations. Cerebral Press.
Cortex, 23, 499‑507. Rayner, K., Carlson, M. & Frazier, L. (1983). The
Premack, D. (1976). Intelligence in ape and man. interaction of syntax and semantics during
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. sentence processing: Eye movements in the
Pressley, M., Cariglia, B. T., Deane, S. & Schnei- analysis of semantically biased sentences.
der, W. (1987). Short-term memory, verbal Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Beha‑
competence, and age as predictors of ima- vior, 22, 358‑374.
gery instructional effectiveness. Journal of Rayner, K., Well, A. D. & Pollatsek, A. (1980).
Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 194‑211. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in
Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 27,
Wood, E. & Amhad, M. (1987). Generation 537‑544.
and precision of elaboration: Effects on Reed, S. K., Ernst, G. W. & Banerji, R. (1974).
intentional and incidental learning. Journal of The role of analogy in transfer between simi-
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, lar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6,
and Cognition, 13, 291‑300. 436‑450.
Prull, M.W. & Yockelson, M.B. (2013). Adult Reeves, L. M. & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The
age-related differences in the misinformation role of content and abstract information in
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. direct observation. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532‑547. ning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 99‑105.
Rosch, E. E. & Lloyd, B. B. E. (1978). Cognition Ruthruff, E., Allen, P. A., Lien, M. C. & Grabbe,
and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. (2008). Visual word recognition without
Erlbaum Associates, Inc. central attention: Evidence for greater auto-
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resem- maticity with greater reading ability. Psycho‑
blances: Studies in the internal structure of nomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 337‑343.
categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573‑605. Sabramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B. & Jung-
Rose, N. S. & Craik, F. I. (2012). A processing Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for
approach to the working memory/long- facilitation of insight by positive affect. Jour‑
term memory distinction: Evidence from nal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 415‑432.
the levels-of-processing span task. Journal of Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recopition memory for syn-
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, tactic and semantic aspects of connected
and Cognition, 38, 1019‑1029. discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2,
Rosen, V. M. & Engle, R. W. (1997). The role 437‑442.
of working memory capacity in retrieval. Salame, P. & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disrup-
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, tion of short-term memory by unattended
126, 211‑227. speech: Implications for the structure of
Rossi, S. & Van der Henst, J. B. (Eds.) (2007). working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning
Psychologies du raisonnement. Bruxelles: De and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150‑164.
Boeck. Salthouse, T. A. & Prill, K. A. (1987). Inferences
Rossi, S., Caverni, J. P. & Girotto, V. (2001). about age impairments in inferential reaso-
Hypothesis testing in a rule discovery pro- ning. Psychology and Aging, 2, 43‑51.
blem: When a focused procedure is effective. Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Franconeri, S. L., Kounios,
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycho- J. & Beeman, M. (2015). Sudden insight is
logy A, 54, 263‑267. associated with shutting out visual inputs.
Rossi, S., Cassotti, M., Moutier, S., Delcroix, N. & Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1‑6.
Houdé, O. (2015). Helping reasoners succeed Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E. &
in the Wason selection task: When execu- Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are cor-
tive learning discourages heuristic response rect more often than analytic solutions. Thin‑
but not necessarily encourages logic. PloS king and Reasoning, 22, 443‑460.
ONE, 10: e0123024. doi: 10.1371/journal. Samuels, A. B. (1981). Phonemic restoration:
pone.0123024 Insights from a new methodology. Journal
Rozencwajg, P., Cherfi, M., Ferrandez, A. M., of Experimental Psychology: General, 110,
Lautrey, J. Lemoine, C. & Loarer, E. (2005). 474‑494.
Age-related changes in the strategies used Saufley, W. H., Otaka, S. R. & Bavaresco, J. L.
by middle aged adults to solve a block design (1985). Context effects: Classroom tests and
task. The International Journal of Aging and context independence. Memory & Cognition,
Human Development, 50, 159‑182. 13, 522‑528.
Rumelhart, D. E. & Siple, P. (1974). Process Sausset, S., Lambert, E. & Olive, T. (2013). Flexi-
of recognizing tachistoscopically presented bility of orthographic and graphomotor
words. Psychological Review, 81, 99‑118. coordination during a handwritten copy
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & Group, task: effect of time pressure. Frontiers in
T. P. R. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed pro‑ Psychology, 4, 866.
cessing: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics.
Press. New York, NJ: Wiley.
Rundus, D. & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Rehearsal Savage-Raumbagh, S., McDonald, K., Sevcik,
processes in free recall: A procedure for R. A., Hopkins, W. D. & Rubert, E. (1986).
Spontaneous symbol acquisition and com- Searle, J. R. (1979). Experession and meaning: Stu‑
municative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan dies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge,
Paniscus). Journal of Experimental Psycho‑ UK: Cambridge University Press.
logy: General, 115, 211‑235. Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem sol-
Schacter, D. L. & Tubing, E. (1994). Memory ving. Creative Research Journal, 16, 141‑148.
systems. Cambridge: MIT Press. Trad. fr. par Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of
B. Deweer, Systèmes de mémoire chez l’ani‑ sight. How we read, why so many can’t, and
mal et chez l’homme, Marseille: Solal, 1996. what can be done about it. New York: Basic
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History Books.
and current status. Journal of Experimental Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989).
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, A distributed, developmental model of
13, 501‑518. word recognition and naming. Psychological
Schaeken, W., De Vooght, G., Vandierendonck, Review, 96, 523‑568.
A. & d’Ydewalle, G. (Eds.) (2014), Deductive Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to men‑
reasoning and strategies. Hove: Psychology tal structure. New York: Cambridge Univer-
Press. sity Press.
Schank, R. (1999). Dynamic Memory Revisited. Shallice, T. & Cooper, R. P. (2011). The organi‑
Cambridge University Press. sation of mind. Oxford: Oxford University
Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Press.
plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry Sharot, T., Martorella, E. A., Delgado,
into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, M. R. & Phelps, E. A. (2012). How personal
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. experience modulates the neural circuitry
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Control- of memories of September 11. Proceedings
led and automatic human information pro- of the National Academy of Sciences, 104,
cessing: I. Detection, search, and attention. 389‑394.
Psychological Review, 84, 1‑66. Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rota-
Schooler, J. W. (2011). Introspecting in the spirit tion of three-dimensional objects. Science,
of William James: comment on Fox, Ericsson, 171 (3972), 701‑703.
and Best (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, Siegler, R. S. (1998). Children’s thinking (3d ed.).
345‑350. Upper Saddler River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Schooler, J. W. & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Siegler, R. S. & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and
Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: younger adults’ strategy choices in multi-
Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive plication: Testing predictions of ASCM
Psychology, 22, 36‑71. using the choice/no-choice method. Journal
Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S. & Brooks, K. (1993). of Experimental Psychology: General, 126,
Thoughts beyond words: When language 71‑92.
overshadows insight. Journal of Experimen‑ Siegler, R. S. & McGilly, K. (1989). Strategy
tal Psychology: General, 122, 166‑183. choices in children’s time-telling. In
Schott-Bourget, V. (1994). Approches de la lin‑ I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human
guistique. Paris: Nathan. cognition: A life-span perspective. Amster-
Schunn, C. D. & Dunbar, K. (1996). Primary, ana- dam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
logy, and awareness in complex reasoning. Siegler, R. S., Adolph, K. & Lemaire, P. (1997).
Memory & Cognition, 24, 271‑284. Strategy choices across life-span. In L. Reder
Schweppe, J., Grice, M. & Rumer, R. (2011). (Ed.), Implicit Memory and Metacognition
What models of verbal working memory can (pp. 79‑122). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
learn from phonoloigcal theory: Decompo- Simon, H. (1955). A behavioural model of ratio-
sing the phonological similarity effect. Jour‑ nal choice. The Quarterly Journal of Econo-
nal of Memory and Language, 64, 256‑269. mics, 69, 99‑118.
mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- strategy switch costs in young and older
baum Associates. adults. A study in arithmetic problem solving.
Sternberg, R. J. & Kalmar, D. (1998). When will Experimental Aging Research, 41, 136‑156.
the milk spoil? Everyday induction in human Talarico, J. M. & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence,
intelligence. Intelligence, 25, 185‑203. not consistency, characterizes flashbulb
Sternberg, R. J. & Frensch, P.A. (1991). Complex memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455‑61.
problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. coherence: Toward a definition of comprehen‑
Sternberg, R. J. & Gardner, M. K. (1982). A sion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass/
componential interpretation of the general Taylor and Francis Group.
factor in human intelligence. In H. J. Eysenck Tapiero, I. & Denhiere, G. (1995). Simulating
(Ed.), A model for intelligence. Berlin: recall and recognition by using Kintsch’s
Springer-Verlag. construction-integration model. In C. A.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing I. Weaver & S. Mannes (Eds.), Discourse com‑
stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta prehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch.
Psychologica, Amsterdam, 30, 276‑315. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New fin- Inc.
dings and current controversies. Quarterly Taplin, J. E. (1971). Reasoning with conditional
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1‑32. sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and
Stewart, N. (2009). The cost of anchoring on cre- Verbal Behavior, 10, 219‑225.
dit-card minimum repayments. Psychological Taraban, R. & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Consti-
Science, 20, 39‑41. tuent attachment and thematic role assi-
Stich, K. P., Dehnahardt, G. & Mauck, B. (2002). gnment in sentence processing: Influences
Mental rotation of perspective stimuli in a of content-based expectations. Journal of
California sea Lion (Zalophus californianus). Memory and Language, 27, 597‑632.
Brain, Behavior, and Evolution, 61, 101‑12. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize
Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdma, them: A case study on the role of view-
A., van Baaren, R. B. & Nordgren, L. F. (2011). point dependency in the recognition of three-
A meta-analysis on unconscious thought dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin
effects. Social Cognition, 29, 738‑762 and Review, 2, 55‑82.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in Tarr, M. J. & Buelthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human
serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimen‑ object recognition better described by geon
tal Psychology, 18, 643‑662. structural descriptions or by multiple views?
Sullivan, L. (1976). Selective attention and secon- Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein
dary message analysis: A reconsideration of (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Broadbent’s filter model of selective atten- Human Perception and Performance, 21,
tion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psy‑ 1494‑1505.
chology, 28, 167‑178. Tarr, M. J. & Pinker, S. (1991). Orientation-
Sunstein, C. R. & Thaler, R. (2016). The two dependent mechanisms in shape recogni-
friends who changed how we think about tion: Further issues. Psychological Science,
how we think. The New Yorker. 2, 207‑209.
Taillan, J., Ardiale, E., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, Terrace, H. S., Petitto, L. A., Sanders,
B., Félician, O. & Lemaire, P. (2015). Pro- R. J. & Bever, T. G. (1979). Can an ape create
cesses in arithmetic strategy selection: A a sentence? Science, 206 (4421), 891‑902.
fMRI study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: Thevenot, C., Barrouillet, P., Castel, C. & Uitten-
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00061 hove, K. (2016). Ten-year-old children stra-
Taillan, J., Ardiale, E. & Lemaire, P. (2015). Rela- tegies in mental addition: A counting model
tionships between strategy switching and account. Cognition, 146, 48‑57.
Thevenot, C., Castel, C., Fanget, M. & Fayol, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Beha‑
M. (2010). Mental subtraction in high and vior, 3, 449‑459.
lower-skilled arithmetic problem solvers: Ver- Treisman, A. M. (1964b). Verbal cues, language,
bal report vs. operand- recognition paradigms. and meaning in selective attention. American
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Journal of Psychology, 77, 206‑219.
Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1242‑1255.
Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-inte-
Thiry, P. (1996). Notions de logique (2e éd.). gration theory of attention. Cognitive Psycho‑
Bruxelles: De Boeck Université. logy, 12, 97‑136.
Thomas, C. & Didierjean, A. (2016). Magicians Tulving E (2002). Episodic memory: from mind to
fix your mind: How unlikely solutions block brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1‑25.
obvious ones. Cognition, 154, 169‑173.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic
Thomas, C., Didierjean, A., Maquestiaux, F. & memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson
Gygax, P. (2015). Does Magic Offer a Cryp- (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Aca-
tozoology Ground for Psychology? Review of demic Press.
General Psychology, 19, 117‑128. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory.
Thompson, D. M. (1972). Cortex effects on reco- Oxford: Oxford University Press.
gnition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory sys-
and Verbal Behavior, 11, 497‑511. tems are there? American Psychologist, 40,
Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. 385‑398.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Tulving, E. & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availabi-
Topolinski, S. & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining lity versus accessibility of information in
Insight Into the ‘Aha’ Experience. Cur‑ memory for words. Journal of Verbal Lear‑
rent Directions in Psychological Science, 14, ning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381‑391.
402‑405. Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Enco-
Townsend, D. J. & Bever, T. G. (1982). Natu- ding specificity and retrieval processes in
ral units of representation interact during episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80,
sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal 359‑380.
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 688‑703. Tulving, E., Mandler, G. & Baumal, R. (1964).
Trabasso, T. & Stein, N. (1995). Explanatory Interaction of two sources of information in
inferences and other strategies during com- tachistoscopic word recognition. Canadian
prehension: Encoding effects on recall. In Journal of Psychology, 18, 62‑71.
R. Lorch & E. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of cohe‑ Turner, M. L. & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working
rence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. memory capacity task dependent? Journal of
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P. & Suh, S. (1989). Memory and Language, 28, 127‑154.
Logical necessity and transitivity of causal Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A
relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79,
1‑25. 281‑299.
Traxler, M. J., Bybee, M. D. & Pickering, M. J. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psy‑
(1997). Influence of connectives on language chological Review, 84, 327‑352.
comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for Tversky, A. & Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separa-
incremental interpretation. Quarterly Jour‑ bility, and the triangle inequality. Psychologi‑
nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Expe‑ cal Review, 89, 123‑154.
rimental Psychology, 50A, 481‑497. Tversky, A. & et Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selec- the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulle‑
tive listening. Quarterly Journal of Experi‑ tin, 76, 105‑110.
mental Psychology, 12, 242‑248. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availabi-
Treisman, A. M. (1964a). Monitoring and storage lity: A heuristic for judging frequency and
of irrelevant messages in selective attention. probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207‑232.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment the visual input is directed to the left cere-
under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. bral hemisphere. Psychological Science, 4,
Science, 185 (4157), 1124‑1131. 99‑103.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing Vergauwe, E., Barrouillet, P. & Camos, V. (2009).
of decisions and the psychology of choice. Visual and spatial working memory are not
Science, 211 (4481), 453‑458. dissociated after all: A time-based resource
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional sharing account. Journal of Experimental Psy‑
versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35,
fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological 1012‑1028.
Review, 90, 293‑315. Versace, R., Nevers, B. & Padovan, C. (2002). La
Tversky, A., Sattath, S. & Slovic, P. (1988). mémoire dans tous ses états. Marseille: Solal.
Contingent weighting in judgment and Vinson, N. G. & Reed, C. L. (2002). Sources
choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371‑384. of object-specific effects in representational
Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Worner, W. J., momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 41‑65.
Pliske, D. B., Mynatt, C. R., Gross, K. A. & Vo, M. L.-H. & Wolfe, J. M. (2012). When does
Arkkelin, D. L. (1980). Strategies for rule dis- repeated search in scenes involve memory?
covery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal Lokking at versus looking for objects in
of Experimental psychology, 32, 109‑123. scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R. Human Perception & Performance, 38, 23‑41.
(1981). On Scientific Thinking. New York: von Neumann, John & Oskar Morgenstern.
Columbia University Press. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Beha‑
Tyler, L. K. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1977). The vior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
on-line effects of semantic context on syntac- Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A. & Penner,
tic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and B. C. (1983). Problem solving skill in social
Verbal Behavior, 16, 683‑692. sciences. In G. Power (Ed.), The psychology
Underwood, B. J. (1957). Interference and forget- of learning and motivation: Advances in
ting. Psychological Review, 64, 49‑60. research and theory (Vol. 17). New York:
Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences Academic Press.
as a crucible in theory construction. Ameri‑ Voss, J. F., Tyler, S. W. & Yengo, L. A. (1983). Indi-
can Psychologist, 30, 128‑134. vidual differences in solving of social science
Underwood, B. J. & Schulz, R. W. (1960). Res- problems. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck
ponse dominance and rate of learning paired (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition
associates. Journal of General Psychology, 62, (pp. 205‑232). New York: Academic Press.
153‑158. Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Read, J. D. & Lindsay,
Van den Broek, P. & Lorch, R. F. (1993). D. S. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand
Network representations of causal relations lies: Using false photographs to create false
in memory for narrative texts: Evidence childhood memories. Psychonomic Bulle‑
from primed recognition. Discourse Processes, tin & Review, 9, 597‑603.
16, 75‑98. Wade, N. J. & Swanston, M. T. (2013). Visual
Vauclair, J. (1996). Animal Cognition: Recent perception: An introduction (3d ed.). Hove:
Developments in modern Comparative Psy- Psychology Press.
chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer- Wagenaar, W. A. (1986). My memory: A study
sity Press. of autobiographical memory over six years.
Vauclair, J. (2016). Psychologie comparée: Cogni‑ Cognitive Psychology, 18, 225‑252.
tion, communication et langage. Paris: Presses Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London:
universitaires de Paris Ouest. Jonathan Cape
Vauclair, J., Fagot, J. & Hopkins, W. D. (1993). Waroquier, L., Abadie, M., Klein, O. & Cleeremans,
Rotation of mental images in baboons when A. (2014). The effect of the cognitive demands
perceived size. Psychonomic Bulletin and first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly
Review, 15, 581‑585. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler Experimental Psychology, 50, 421‑438.
(Ed.), Attention. Hove, England UK: Psycho- Zaragoza, M. S. & Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repea-
logy Press. ted exposure to suggestion and the creation
Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., Rosenholtz, R., Kuz- of false memories. Psychological Science, 7,
mova, Y. I. & Sherman, A. M. (2011). Visual 294‑300.
search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Zaragoza, M. S., McCloskey, M. & Jamis,
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, M. (1987). Misleading postevent informa-
1650‑1671. tion and recall of the original event: Further
Wolfe, J. M., Vo, M. L.-H, Evans, K. K. & Greene, evidence against the memory impairment
M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psycho‑
selective and nonselective pathways. Trends logy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13,
in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 77‑84. 36‑44.
Wood, N. L. & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail Zesiger, P. (1995). Écrire. Approches cognitive,
party phenomenon revisited: Attention and neuropsychologique et développementale.
memory in the classic selective listening pro- Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
cedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experi‑ Zesiger, P., Mounoud, P. & Hauert, C. A. (1993).
mental Psychology: General, 124, 243‑62. Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency
Woodworth, R. S. & Sells, S. B. (1935). An on handwriting production in children and
atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic rea- adults. Acta Psychologica, 82, 353‑365.
soning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C. & Zorzi, M. (2014).
18, 451‑460. Modelling reading development through
Worthy, D. A. & Maddox, W. T. (2012). Age- phonological decoding and self-teaching:
based differences in strategy use in choice Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical
tasks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 1‑10. Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369,
Wright, G. N. & Phillips, L. D. (1980). Cultural 20120397.
variation in probabilistic thinking: Alterna- Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., Jacobs, A. M. (1997).
tive ways of dealing with uncertainty. Inter‑ The feedback consistency effect in lexical
national Journal of Psychology, 15, 239‑257. decision and naming. Journal of Memory and
Wright, R. E. (1981). Aging, divided attention, Language, 37, 533‑554.
and processing capacity. Journal of Geronto‑ Ziegler, J. C., Rey, A. & Jacobs, A. M. (1998).
logy, 36, 605‑614. Individual word identification thresholds
Zagar, D., Pynte, J. & Raviteau, S. (1997). Evi- and errors in the fragmentation task.
dence for early-closure attachment on Memory & Cognition, 26, 490‑501.