Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Marcia L. Colish
1
The leading advocate of this position is Pierre Courcelle, “Plotin et saint
Ambroise,” Revue de philologie, de littérature, et d’histoire anciennes 76 (1950), 29–56; idem,
“Nouvelle aspects de platonisme chez saint Ambroise,” Revue des études latines 34 (1956),
220–39; idem, “L’humanisme chrétien de saint Ambroise,” Orpheus 9 (1962), 21–34;
idem, “Anti-Christian Arguments and Christian Platonism,” in The Conflict between
Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century, ed. Arnaldo Momigliano (Oxford, 1963),
pp. 165–66; idem, Recherches sur les Confessions de S. Augustin, 2nd ed. (Paris, 1968), pp.
106–17, 122, 124–38; idem, Late Latin Writers and Their Greek Sources, trans. Harry E.
Wedek (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), pp. 137–38; idem, “Ambroise de Milan, ‘professeur
de philosophie’,” Revue de l’histoire de philosophie 181 (1972), 147–55; idem, Recherches sur
saint Ambroise: “Vies” anciennes, culture, iconographie (Paris, 1973), p. 16; idem, Connais-toi
toi-même de Socrate à saint Bernard, 2 vols. (Paris, 1974), 1:122–23, 125; idem, “Saint
Ambroise devant le précepte delphique,” in Forma futuri: Studi in onore del cardinale Michele
Pellegrino (Turin, 1975), pp. 185–86. See also Raymond Thamin, Saint Ambroise et la morale
chrétienne au IV e siècle: Étude comparée des traités ‘Des devoirs’ de Cicéron et de saint Ambroise
(Paris, 1895), p. 324; W. Willbrand, “Ambrosius und Plato,” Römische Quartalschrift 25
(1911), *42–*49; Lorenzo Taormina, “Sant’Ambrogio e Plotino,” in idem, Miscellanea
di studi di letteratura cristiana antica (Catania, 1954), pp. 41–85; Pierre Hadot, “Platon
et Plotin dans trois sermons de saint Ambroise,” Revue des études latines 34 (1956),
203–20; Aimé Solignac, “Nouvelles parallèles entre saint Ambroise et Plotin (Le De
Jacob et vita beata et le o , (Ennéade I, IV),” Archives de philosophie, n.s.
19 (1956), 148–56; Wolfgang Seibel, Fleisch und Geist beim heiligen Ambrosius (Munich,
1958), pp. 15–50, 97–99, 119–22, 129–45, 194–97; Heinrich Dörrie, “Das fünffach
gestufte Mysterium: Der Aufstieg der Seele bei Porphyrios und Ambrosius,” in Mullus:
Festschrift Theodor Klauser, eds. Alfred Stuiber and Alfred Herman (Münster, 1965), pp.
83–92; Ernst Dassmann, Die Frömmigkeit des Kirchenvaters Ambrosius von Mailand: Quellen und
Entfaltung (Münster, 1965), p. 17; Helen North, Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint
in Greek Literature, Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 35 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1966), pp.
312–23, 328–60; André Loiselle, “‘Nature’ de l’homme et histoire de salut: Étude sur
l’anthropologie d’Ambroise de Milan,” Ph.D. diss., Université de Lyon, 1970, pp. 1–4,
12, 24–25, 31, 35–39, 44–46, 48–49, 77–78, 90, 117–20, 127, 143, 168; Peter Brown,
The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity (New York,
1988), pp. 348–49; Robert A. Markus, The End of Ancient Christianity (Cambridge, U.K.
1990), pp. 34–38, 49; Elizabeth A. Clark, Reading Renunciation: Asceticism and Scripture in
Early Christianity (Princeton, 1999), p. 89; John Moorhead, Ambrose: Church and Society
in the Late Roman World (London, 1999), pp. 56–59, 172–73; Ilario Tolomio, “‘Corpus
carcer’ nell’Alto Medioevo: Metamorfosi di un concetto,” in Anima e corpo nella cultura
medievale, Atti del V convegno di studi della Società italiana per lo studio del pensiero
medievale, Venezia, 25–28 settembre 1995, eds. Carla Casagrande and Silvana Vecchio
(Florence, 1999), pp. 5–6, 10–11, 13. Although Carole Hill, “Classical and Christian
Tradition in Some Works of Saint Ambrose of Milan,” Ph.D. diss., Oxford University,
1980, pp. 150–76, generally portrays Ambrose as a Stoic, she sees him teaching a
Platonic body-soul dualism.
2
See, in particular, Franco Gori, introduction to his translation of Ambrose, Verginità
e vedovanza, ed. Ignatius Cazzaniga, Sancti Ambrosii episcopi mediolanensis opera
[hereafter SAEMO] 14/1–2 (Milan, 1989), 1:74, 76–78, 91; Jan N. Bremmer, “Pauper
or Patroness: The Widow in the Early Christian Church,” in Between Poverty and the Pyre:
Moments in the History of Widowhood, Jan Bremmer and Lourens van den Bosch, eds. (New
York, 1995), pp. 43–45; Domingo Ramos-Lissón, “En torno al alegorismo bíblico del
tratado De virginitatis de San Ambrosio: Los préstamos de los clásicos y cristianos,” in
Stimuli: Exegese und ihre Hermeneutik in Antike und Christentum. Festschrift für Ernst Dassmann,
Georg Schöllgen and Clemens Schotten, eds., Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum,
Ergänzungsband 23 (Münster, 1996), pp. 455–56, 459, 460–61. Even more extreme
are John Bugge, Virginitas: An Essay on the History of a Medieval Ideal (The Hague, 1975),
pp. 31–66 and Calogero Riggi, “Fedeltà verginale e coniugale in S. Ambrogio,” in
“Humanitas” classica e “sapientia” cristiana: Scritti offerti a Roberto Iacoangeli, ed. Sergio Felici
(Rome, 1992), pp. 180–83, who see in Ambrose the idea that the primal parents
were pure spirit when first created and that embodiment and human sexuality are
consequences of original sin.
3
Ambrose, Hexaemeron 6.9.6.39, ed. Karl Schenkl, trans. Gabriele Banterle, SAEMO
1 (Milan, 1979); idem, De paradiso 1.5, 10.47–11.49, ed. Karl Schenkl, trans. Paolo
Siniscalco, SAEMO 2/1 (Milan, 1984). Noted by Loiselle, “‘Nature’ de l’homme,”
pp. 20–26; Luigi Franco Pizzolato, “La coppia umana in Sant’Ambrogio,” in Etica
e matrimonio nel cristianesimo delle origini, ed. Raniero Cantalamessa (Milan, 1976), pp.
190–208; Moorhead, Ambrose, pp. 45–46. Cf. Bugge and Riggi in n. 2 supra.