Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PART 2
Durée : 3 heures 30
Objectives
Part 2 of the sequence will be devoted to practice for your oral comprehension, written comprehension
and written expression- in two hours, then study the corrections carefully to note new vocabulary, new
ideas and new cultural references.
Following this, you can practise studying a picture without any preparation, and recording your answer.
You can then again study the correction and note any new vocabulary or ideas.
This part of the sequence will enable you to reflect on the role of the artist as a social critic. The texts
dealt with will explore this slant, and will enable you to draw a parallel between Victorian times and our
present day.
Thus, you will be able to form your personal opinion about art and power and the extent to which they are
interrelated.
Vous allez écouter le document trois fois. Vous pouvez prendre des notes pendant les écoutes. Essayez de
prendre vos notes le plus possible en anglais. A l’issue de la troisième écoute, vous ferez un compte rendu en
français du document, en montrant que vous avez compris :
• la nature du document;
• le thème principal;
• les informations contenues dans le document;
• l’identité du locuteur;
• le point de vue exprimé par le locuteur;
Conseils :
Aérez vos notes et changez de couleur à chaque écoute. Servez-vous du titre pour vérifier que
vous avez compris la portée du document. Pensez au WH Checklist pour guider votre prise de
notes. Ne passez pas plus de trente minutes sur cette activité.
Read the two texts, then answer the comprehension questions. Spend no more than an hour on reading
the texts and answering the questions. This will leave you 30 minutes to do Activity 3: written expression.
After the written expression, study the corrections carefully in order to note new vocabulary, grammar
points, ideas and cultural references.
Text 1
The power of seeing
John Ruskin is having his moment — and not before time. For decades his reputation as
the pre-eminent Victorian critic of art and society was a matter of purely historical interest,
manifesting itself in a disproportionate number of copies of The Stones of Venice or Sesame and
Lilies in secondhand bookshops. Unlike his disciple William Morris, he didn’t even bequeath a
decent series of wallpaper designs to posterity.
But with the bicentenary of his birth, marked by this fascinating exhibition at Two Temple
Place, popular interest in Ruskin is undergoing a revival. And that’s because his world view
wasn’t merely to do with art, though he almost singlehandedly restored the reputation of Gothic
architecture, championed the Pre-Raphaelites, practically created the Arts and Crafts movement
and forced Turner’s contemporaries to recognise his genius. As for his reverence for nature, it
anticipated our own... in his cloud studies he would observe the effects of industrialisation on
the weather — prophetic, no?
His take on art was moral, part of a fully formed, combative world view which saw art as part of
a society in which the condition of the workers, and the place of beauty and the value of craft, all
had their place. (…)
He valued Venetian architecture as representing civic equality, not just for its detached beauty.
And it was because he set store by the dignity of workers and the right of ordinary folk to beauty
that he created a museum, initially set on a hill, to Sheffield — a town with which he had no
connection other than an appreciation of the skills of its metal workers. (…)
Text 2
A political conundrum1.
There are also ladies and gentlemen of another fashion, not so new, but very elegant, who
have agreed to put a smooth glaze on the world, and to keep down all its realities. For whom
everything must be languid and pretty. Who have found out the perpetual stoppage. Who are
to rejoice at nothing, and be sorry for nothing. Who are not to be disturbed by ideas. On whom
even the fine arts, attending in powder and walking backward like the Lord Chamberlain, must
array themselves in the milliners’ and tailors’ patterns of past generations, and be particularly
careful not to be in earnest, or to receive any impress from the moving age.
Then there is my Lord Boodle, of considerable reputation with his party, who has known what
office is, and who tells Sir Leicester Dedlock with much gravity, after dinner, that he really does
not see to what the present age is tending. A debate is not what a debate used to be; the House
is not what the House used to be; even a Cabinet is not what it formerly was. He perceives with
astonishment, that supposing the present Government to be overthrown, the limited choice of
the Crown, in the formation of a new Ministry, would lie between Lord Coodle and Sir Thomas
Doodle - supposing it to be impossible for the Duke of Foodle to act with Goodle, which may
be the case in consequence of the breach arising out of that affair with Hoodle. Then, giving
the Home Department and the leadership of the House of Commons to Joodle, the Exchequer
to Hoodle, the Colonies to Loodle, and the Foreign Office to Moodle, what are you to do with
Noodle? You can’t offer him the Presidency of the Council; that is reserved for Poodle. You can’t
put him in the Woods and Forests; that is hardly good enough for Quoodle. What follows? That
the country is shipwrecked, lost and gone to pieces (as is made manifest to the patriotism of Sir
Leicester Dedlock) because you can’t provide for Noodle!
Charles Dickens, Bleak House, 1853.
Text 1
a. Identify the nature of the document and specify the identity of the author and the main topic. Answer
briefly.
b. What is the speaker’s opinion about the topic she is dealing with in this text? Justify with a quote from
the text.
c. Explain the following quote: ‘In his cloud studies, he would observe the effects of industrialization on
the weather - prophetic, no?’
Text 2
d. Pick out 4 words or expressions which refer to politics.
e. W
hat can you say about the names of the characters in the text? What effect is the writer aiming to
create by the choice of these names? Answer briefly.
f. W
hat seems to be the author’s opinion of ‘ladies and gentlemen of another fashion.’ Answer in your
own words and justify with one quote from the text.
Texts 1 and 2
g. Compare and contrast the vision of art as described in Text 1 with the description of the ‘Fine Arts’ in
Text 2.
Are you inspired by the arts (painting, drawing, sculpture, music, theatre, literature...)? To what extent
do you think artists should be role models? Illustrate your arguments with examples of artists from the
Anglo-Saxon world.
1) Faites une introduction où vous analysez le sujet et vous annoncez votre problématique :
We can wonder whether.../ the question raised is…
2) Développez vos arguments en deux parties ; mais essayez d’éviter le plan ‘avantages et inconvénients’.
Donnez des exemples concrets pour étayer vos arguments. Vous pouvez utiliser les exemples du cours.
Essayez de rester dans le monde anglo-saxon.
3) La conclusion doit montrer que vous avez répondu à la question, mais votre réponse peut être
nuancée.
When analysing a document, such as a picture or a text, it is isn’t always easy to avoid repeating ‘the
painter shows us’, or ‘the writer describes’. In French it is, of course, handy to be able to use the
expression ‘on’ – ‘on nous montre’, ‘on crée une impression’…In English ‘on’ doesn’t exist, the pronoun
‘one’ is no longer used, even by the Queen! So English, as is often the case, makes use of the passive
form:
We are shown..
A sense of …is created..
We are given the impression that
The beauty of …..is described/depicted/portrayed...
Check the explanation of this grammar point in ‘Petite grammaire anglaise,’ by Sylvie Persec, in
Chapter 38 entitled ‘La voix passive’, the paragraph ‘Traduction de « on »’ ; then do the following
exercise.
Exercise:
Rephrase the following segments with a passive construction based on the examples given: ‘We are
shown...’ etc:
1. The picture reminds us of…
2. The author reveals the excesses of the system…
3. The author informs us that…
4. The journalist tells the readers that…
5. The author makes us think about…
Adding an idea: moreover; Avoiding ‘black and white’ statements, adding ‘nuance’:
furthermore; in addition;
To a certain extent / to a certain degree: dans une
besides..
certaine mesure ; we have to take into account: il faut
Contradicting: however; tenir compte de…
nonetheless; conversely; on the
having said that / that being said: ceci étant dit;
other hand; nevertheless; in spite
admittedly / we have to admit; it is true that: il faut
of; despite..
reconnaître…
arguably/undoubtedly: sans doute…
Now that you have practised oral and written comprehension, you are ready to tackle the assessments.
When you have completed these assessments, you can add the ideas dealt with in the documents to your
culture and ideas files in order to enrich your oral expression. Think, in particular, about the way that art
and power are related, and how each may serve the other…or be critical of one another!