Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Objectives
Se familiariser avec les diffrentes types de diagraphies
Apprendre a calcul les paramtres ptrophysiques.
Notions sur les diffrents types des outils et leur principe de
fonctionnement.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Hauteur utile
Porosit
Saturation
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Terminologie
Claystone
Oil
Net Pay
Claystone
Non-Reservoir
Oil
Non-Reservoir
Oil
Net Pay
Oil
Net Pay
Water
Aquifer
Net Reservoir
Net Pay
Claystone
Gross Reservoir
Net Reservoir
Net Reservoir
Non-Reservoir
Net Reservoir
Porous & Permeable Sst
Claystone
Net Pay
Mars 2010
<=
Net Reservoir
<=
Gross Reservoir
IAP-Boumerdes
La Porosit
Porosit Totale
pore
Vtotal
VT VS
... %
VS
Porosit Effective
Porosit Secondaire
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
La Saturation
Saturation dhuile critique (Soc): cest la saturation a partir laquelle lhuile
commence a se dplace.
Saturation dhuile rsiduelle (Sor): durant le process dinjection deau ou
Gaz lhuile se dplace est reste un volume derrire qui ne se dplace pas on
lappelle saturation dhuile rsiduelle (gnralement Sor>Soc).
Saturation dhuile mobile (Som): cest la fraction de volume de pore
occuper par lhuile mobile donne par.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
PERMEABILITE
Permabilit
Capacit dcoulement dun fluide Units D or mD
Spcifique ou Permabilit Absolue
Ka, Kw
Permabilit Effective
Capacit dcoulement dun fluide a la prsence dun autre fluide.
Permabilit Relative
Kro, Krw
Darcy (D)
(1 D = 1000 mD)
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mineralogy/
Lithology
Porosity
Pore Fluids
Texture/ Pore
Geometry
Gamma Ray/
Spectral GR
PEF / U
Density
Neutron
Sonic
Resistivity
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Gamma Ray - GR
GR
GAPI
150
CALI
IN
16
BS
IN
16
5850
5900
5950
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
POTA
%
0.1 0
THOR
PPM 20
POTA 0
URAN
PPM 20
THOR
5850
5900
5950
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
POTA
%
0.1 0
THOR
PPM 20
POTA 0
URAN
PPM 20
THOR
5850
5900
5950
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
de
la
IAP-Boumerdes
POTA
%
0.1 0
THOR
PPM 20
POTA 0
URAN
PPM 20
THOR
5850
5900
5950
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
PE N * ( Z / A) * b
PE: Photolectrique barns/lectron
N: nombre dAvogadro
Z: Numro atomique ( nombre de proton
dans un noyau atomique)
A: Poids atomique
b : densit apparente qui quivalente a
la vrais densit
IAP-Boumerdes
POTA
%
0.1 0
THOR
PPM 20
POTA 0
URAN
PPM 20
THOR
URAN
5850
5900
5950
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
POTA
THOR
% 0.1 0 PPM 20
URAN
POTA 0 PPM 20
0
THOR
URAN
5850
5900
5950
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
DPT
Vertical Resolution - in
IDPH
IMPH
100
SFL
TDT
DPT
SFL
TDT
CNL
LLD
NGS
SONIC
NGS
LDT
10
LLS
LLD
LLS
FDC
CNL
SONIC
IDPH
IMPH
GST (Capture)
GST (Capture)
FDC
GR
MSFL
LDT
EPT
GR
MSFL
MLL
MINV
EPT
MINV
MNOR
HDT
MNOR
MLL
HDT
0.1
0.1
10
100
1000
Depth of Investigation - in
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Where:
L
Vma1
Vma2
Lma1
Lma2
Lfl
Log response in 100% pore fluid
Basic Porosity Equation (Clean Homogeneous Formations only one matrix
component E.G. Clean sandstone, clean limestone)
= (Lma L) /(Lma Lfl)
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
0.9
0.8
Porosity () - v/v
0.7
0.6
DOL
LST
0.5
SST
0.4
0.3
Bulk Formation Density (b) = Matrix Density
0.2
(ma)
when Porosity () = 0.0
Matrix densities:
Quartz (Sandstone) - 2.65 g/cc
Calcite (Limestone) - 2.71 g/cc
Dolomite - 2.87 g/cc
0.1
0.0
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
0.9
0.8
Porosity () - v/v
0.7
0.6
0.5
where for:
SST - use Nma = -0.04
LST - use Nma = 0.00
DOL - use Nma = +0.08 (when >0.05)
SST
LST
DOL
0.4
0.3
Neutron Porosity (N) = Neutron Matrix (Nma)
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.05
0.05
0.15
0.25
0.35
0.45
0.55
0.65
0.75
0.85
0.95
1.05
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
0.9
Cp 1.1
0.8
Cp 1.2
0.7
Porosity () - v/v
Cp 1.0
Cp 1.3
Cp 1.4
Cp 1.5
0.6
Cp 1.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
DOL RH
LST RH
SST RH
DOL W, Cp=1
LST W, Cp=1
SST W, Cp=1
SST W, Cp=1.1
SST W, Cp=1.2
SST W, Cp=1.3
SST W, Cp=1.4
SST W, Cp=1.5
SST W, Cp=1.6
0.2
0.1
0.0
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Neutron-Density Crossplot
Interpretation of total porosity in clay free
formations with heterogeneous matrix
composition comprising 1 or more of:
Sst Lst Dol
Valid for:
Calcite or Dolomite Cemented Ssts
Dolomitic Limestones
CLAYS INCREASE
NEUTRON & MAY
CHANGE DENSITY
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Clay Distribution
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Log
Comment
Gamma Ray
Spectral GR
Radioactive Elements
K, Th, U
Density
Bound Water
Neutron
Bound Water
Sonic
Bound Water
PEF
Clay mineralogy
Resistivity
Bound Water
SP
Lack of permeability
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Gamma Ray
Spectral Gamma ray
SP
Rsistivit
Crossplot techniques
Neutron - Densit
Neutron - Sonic
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
1.0
0.9
0.8
GRclay
GR response in 100%
clay formations
0.7
Clay/ShaleVolum
e(VClayGR) - v/v
0.6
0.5
0.4
a=4
GRma
GR matrix response
in clay free
formations
0.3
0.2
Linear Model
Larimov Pre-Tertiary
Larimov Tertiary
Steiber, a=2
Steiber, a=3
Steiber, a=4
a=3
a=2
0.1
0.0
0
IAP-Boumerdes
Petro-logical donnes
Spectral GR Data
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Illite
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Les Couleurs
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
) - v/v
1.0
0.9
0.8
Swirr Model:
VClayRT = (Rclay*(RTmax-RT)/(RT*(RTmax-Rclay)))^(1/b)
0.7
RTclay
RT response in 100%
clay formations
'b' parameter:
If (Rclay/RT) >= 0.5, b=1
If (Rclay/RT) < 0.5 then
b = (1 - Rclay/RT)
0.5
RT
0.6
Clay/ShaleVolum
e(VClay
0.5
0.4
RTmax
Maximum RT response
in clay free formations
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
IAP-Boumerdes
Neutron-Density Crossplot
Interpretation of wet clay volume
in shaly formations
Valid for:
Formations with homogeneous
non-clay matrix
Not valid in reservoirs with gas or
light hydrocarbons where high
hydrocarbon saturations affect
density and neutron logs.
0%
100%
60%
40%
20%
80%
100%
Wet Clay
Point
Mathematical solution:
VclayND =
(N D)
,
(Nclay Dclay)
Where:
N apparent Neutron porosity
D apparent Density porosity
Nclay apparent Neutron porosity in clay
Dclay apparent Density porosity in clay
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Clays include bound water as a part of their structure. Bound water is considered
non-mobile and not part of the reservoir pore system.
Estimates of porosity from logs will include the clay bound water.
Correcting for clay removes that proportion of the total formation porosity that is
associated with clays and provides an estimate of the potentially effective reservoir
porosity (E).
Standard Equations applied using separately defined estimates of total porosity (T). and
clay volume (VClay)
E T VClay *Clay
Where: Clay
Bound water volume (porosity) of the wet clay and is commonly estimated from the
interpreted wet clay density using a standard density-porosity equation. In the calculation the matrix density is
commonly assumed to be the same as quartz (2.65 g/cc), but can be often indicated from core grain density
measurements and may be higher.
Crossplot techniques that provide an simultaneous solution of clay volume and effective
reservoir porosity
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Neutron-Density Crossplot
Interpretation of effective porosity
in shaly formations
Valid for:
Formations with homogeneous nonclay matrix
Not valid for:
Reservoirs with gas or light
hydrocarbons where high hydrocarbon
saturations affect density and neutron
logs.
Wet Clay
Point
Mathematical solution:
E = D - (N D) * Dclay
(Nclay Dclay)
Where:
N apparent Neutron porosity
D apparent Density porosity
Nclay apparent Neutron porosity in clay
Dclay apparent Density porosity in clay
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Wet Clay
Point
Mars 2010
Key points:
Structural Clays - Effective porosity is
maintained.
Laminated Clays Effective porosity
reduced proportionally with clay volume
Dispersed Clays Severe reduction in
effective porosity with small increase in
clay volume. Maximum clay volume
restricted to total pore volume.
IAP-Boumerdes
Lithologie complexe
Exemple de lithologies:
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
M-N Crossplot
Crossplot for lithology identification.
M and N are computed from density,
neutron and sonic values and are
independent of porosity.
M = (DTfl DT) * 0.01
(b fl)
N = (Nfl N)
(b fl)
Where:
DTfl Transit time of pore fluid us/ft
DT Formation Transit time us/ft
b Formation bulk density g/cc
fl Pore fluid density g/cc
Nfl Pore Fluid Neutron Porosity v/v
N Formation Neutron Porosity v/v
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Critical Attribute
Comment
Gamma Ray
Spectral GR
None
Density
Neutron
Sonic
PEF
Low PE in gas
Resistivity
SP
Displaces formation
water.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
SATURATION DEAU
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Matrix
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Log de Rsistivit
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
Zone Vierge
Zone de
transition
Zone lave
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Induction Logs
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Labaque
indique
les
dutilisation chaque sonde.
Critre :
Rt < 1 ohmm utilise le Induction
Rt > 100 ohmm utilise le Laterolog
Si non, utilise labaque comme guide
Mars 2010
conditions
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Micro-Rsistivity Logs
Rxo logs:
MSFL, MCFL, MLL, PROX
Mudcake dtecteurs:
Microlog (ML)
Microlog
Proximity Log (Micro-resistivity)
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Logs de Rsistivit
POTA THOR
0 %0.1 0PPM
20 0
GR
GAPI
150
URAN
0
POTA 0PPM
20 6
CALI
IN
16
BS
IN
16
THOR
0
6
URAN
0
0
GR
5850
5900
5950
Grande rsistivit :
Eau frais -Fresh water Faible porosit
Faible permabilit
Grande Saturation en Hydrocarbure
6000
6050
6100
6150
6200
Faible rsistivit:
Grande salinit deau
Bonne porosit
Bonne permabilit
Faible ou Zro Saturation en
Hydrocarbure
6250
6300
6350
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Logs de Rsistivit
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
FRF = Ro / Rw
FRF = a / Phi m
Ou:
Ro
Rw
a
Phi
m
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
'm' = 1.5
'a' = 1.0
'm' = 2.0
'a' = 1.0
'm' = 2.5
'a' = 1.0
Increasing Pore Tortuosity
100
'm' = 2.15
'a' = 0.62
FRF = a / Porm
10
Decreasing Pore Tortuosity
More open pore systems
'm' is gradient
of the line
1
0.1
Porosity - v/v
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
'n' = 1.5
'n' = 2.0
'n' = 2.5
Resistivity Index
100
RI = 1 / Swn
10
'n' is gradient
of the line
1
0.01
0.1
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
= Ro / Rw
= Rt / Ro
= a / Phi m
= 1 / Sw n
quation dArchie :
a * Rw
Sw m
* Rt
n
Ou :
a
Rw
m
Rt
n
ou bien
Sw n
a * Rw
m * Rt
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Sources de Rw
Analyses d chantillon deau de formation
Connaissance rgionale
Donnes de Logs
Pickett Plot (Rsistivit v Porosit crossplot)
Rwa corrlation
SP
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
WATER PROPERTIES
Water Resistivity (Rw)
dependent on:
Salinity (S)
Temperature (T)
Rw decreases as
temperature increases.
Rw decreases as salinity
increases.
Relationship between Rw, S
and T is defined for NaCl
solutions such that any one
parameter can be estimated
from the other two.
NB
A reported Rw
measurement without a
temperature is
meaningless.
Salinity uniquely defines
the water and from it Rw
can be estimated for any
temperature
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
1.00
Sw =0.8
Sw =0.6
Sw =0.4
Sw =0.2
Porosity - v/v
0.10
Swn = a *Rw
Porm*Rt
Sw =0.1
Increasing
Hydrocarbon
Saturation
Water Line
Relationship between
Resistivity & Porosity
when Sw = 1.0 (100%)
'm' is gradient
of the line
0.01
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1000.00
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Loi dArchie :
m * Rt
Rwa
a
Loi de rapport
Rwa
Mars 2010
Rmf * Rt
Rxo
IAP-Boumerdes
Rw from SP log
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
1.00
Sw =0.8
Sw =0.6
Sw =0.4
Sw =0.2
Porosity - v/v
0.10
Swn = a *Rw
Porm*Rt
Sw =0.1
Increasing
Hydrocarbon
Saturation
Water Line
Relationship between
Resistivity & Porosity
when Sw = 1.0 (100%)
'm' is gradient
of the line
0.01
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1000.00
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Saturation - Exponent n
Sources for n
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Fm.
SST
0.62
2.15
2.0
SST
0.81
2.00
2.0
LST, DOL
1.00
2.00
2.0
LST, DOL
1.00
Porosity dependent
n=m
Caution:
All published parameter sets are empirically derived and may not be valid in your reservoir.
Where possible check validity of parameters against SCAL or log data (Pickett plot).
Using incorrect saturation parameters may result in incorrect water saturations being computed.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Problmes:
principes dArchie suppose que leau interstitiel est le seul milieu conductive.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Conductive
Wet Clay
Rclay
Vclay
Conductive
Pore Water
Non-conductive
Hydrocarbon
Rw
Sw
Effective Pore Space
1 = Vclayc*A + m * Swn
Rt Rclay
a * Rw
Where:
Simandoux Eq.:
c=1, A=1
Mod. Simandoux Eq.: c=1, A=Sw
Indonesia Eq.:
c=(1-Vclay)/2, A=Sw
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
SwT
Conductive Components
Non-conductive
Matrix
Non-conductive
Dry clay colloid
Conductive Conductive
Bound Water Pore Water
Rw B
Sw B
Vclay
Non-conductive
Hydrocarbon
Rw F
Sw F
Effective Pore Space
Total Pore Space
1=
* SwT
Rt a * Rwe
Where:
RwE Equivalent water resistivity of the mix of
the bound and free pore waters
RwE = (RwB/SwB + RwF/SwF) / (SwT)
and
SwB = Vclay * Tclay / T
SwF = SwT-SwB
Rwb can be interpreted from Pickett plots of Rt v PHIT in zones with maximum clay
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
OBM Sxo<= Sw
Mud filtrate oils are displacing moveable hydrocarbon and water and decreasing the
overall water saturation in the flushed zone
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Aquifer Sections
Sws should average approximately 100% if there are no indications of
hydrocarbons being present
Note: Sws consistently greater than 100% indicate an incorrect parameter is being
used and that any hydrocarbon saturations computed above the aquifer may be underestimating the hydrocarbon volume
Transitional Saturations
Also verifiable against capillary pressure data
Capillary pressure can be converted to equivalent height in the reservoir and Sw-height
profiles overlaid with log data
Comparisons should be made between plugs and logged intervals with similar poroperm properties.
Ideally the capillary pressure measurements should be derived using reservoir
equivalent fluids
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Capillary Pressure
Oil-brine Capillary Pressure Data
500
175
Pc = 2 T Cos
r
450
150
400
Pc = h (w - h) g
350
300
100
250
75
200
Eq u ivale n t De p th - ft
In c re a sin g H eig h t
Ca pilla ry P re s s ure - ps i
125
h = 2 T Cos
r (w - h) g
150
50
h=
100
25
50
Pc
* T CosRES
(w - h) * T CosLAB
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Tube radius
r
Wetting phase fluid
Contact Angle
Pc
T
r
h
w
h
g
RES
LAB
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Saturation-Height Profiles
Poor Quality Reservoir
Hydrocarbon Zone
Transition Zone
Hydrocarbon Zone
Transition Zone
Contact
Ht=0
Threshold
height
FWL
Zero Capillary
Pressure
Swirr
0.0
Mars 2010
Water Zone
Water Zone
Sw
Swirr
1.0
0.0
Sw
1.0
IAP-Boumerdes
Mercury Injection
capillary pressure curve
Plug K 87 mD
Por 12.8%
Log estimated Sw
Residual hydrocarbon
saturation levels
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Oil
Net Pay
Claystone
Porous & Permeable Sst
Non-Reservoir
Oil
Net Pay
Claystone
Net Reservoir
Non-Reservoir
Oil
Net Pay
Oil
Net Pay
Aquifer
Net Reservoir
Net Reservoir
Non-Reservoir
Gross Reservoir
Net Pay
Claystone
Water
Net Reservoir
Porous & Permeable Sst
Claystone
Net Pay
<=
Net Reservoir
<=
Gross Reservoir
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Sources de Permabilit
Analyse de carotte
Well Testing
Indique lintervalle de permabilit a partir de pressure build-up
Log Data
Indirect indicateur de permabilit. Besoin de calibration des mesures de
permabilits.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Production Testing
Analyse de PBU donne une valeur moyenne de permabilit K.
Dans le cas ou pntration partiel, la hauteur utile nest pas vidant a dtermin
PLT peut donn les zone productrice do on dtermine net pay.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Caliper
Peut indiquer la prsence de mudcake quand le rayon de trou < rayon de trpan
(bit size).
Mudcake se dveloppe uniquement quand les filtrats envahies les formations
permable
Microlog
Micro-resistivity tool designer pour dtecter mudcake
Logs de Rsistivit
profile Normale lors de formation de Mudcake (Rdeep>Rshallow>RXO ou
Rdeep<Rshallow<RXO) indique que le filtrat envahie les formations permable.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Invasion profile on
resistivities indicates
moved fluids and
presence of permeability
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Quantifying Permeability
Standard Functions
Using and Swirr
From NMR free fluid porosities
J Function Analysis from Capillary Pressure data
Note:
Permeability is a related to pore geometry and rock type
A reservoir may include a range of rock types and pore geometries
Different functions may be required to fully characterise the permeability in a
reservoir
Zone based functions, can applied to a layer based model
Facies/Rock Type based functions require each level in the reservoir to categorised by
facies/rock type
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
1 0 0 00
Permeability Estimation:
Core Derived Functions
1000
Log(K) = a + *b
Or
C o re P e rm e a b ility m D
10
100
K = 10^(a + *b)
Where:
a, b coefficients defined by
statistical regression
0 .0 1
0 .1
10
15
20
25
30
Core Porosity - %
17 Apr 2003 @ 12:42
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
10000.00
Swirr=0.1
Swirr=0.2
Swirr=0.3
Swirr=0.4
1000.00
Swirr=0.5
Swirr=0.6
Swirr=0.7
Swirr=0.8
Swirr=0.9
100.00
Swirr=1
Permeability Estimation:
Timur Equation
10.00
K = 8581 * 4.4
Swirr2
1.00
Where:
- porosity v/v
Swirr irreducible water
saturation v/v
0.10
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Porosity - v/v
Mars 2010
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
NB
Only valid above transition
zone.
IAP-Boumerdes
0.0314 *
FZI
K
* (1 E )
E
E
E3
K 1014 * FZI *
2
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
La distribution de permabilit
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
8200
8300
8350
8400
3600
3610
3620
3630
3640
3650
3660
3670
3680
3690
3700
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Permeability (K)
Thickness (h) weighted
Kave
=
(h * K)
h
(h * )
Mars 2010
(h * * (1-Sw))
IAP-Boumerdes
Fluid Interfaces
Contacts level above which the hydrocarbon fluid saturations decrease as height increases
Free Water Level level above which hydrocarbon is the continuous free fluid phase, and below
which water is the continuous free phase fluid
Hydrocarbon Zone
Transition Zone
Transition Zone
Contact
Ht=0
Threshold
height
FWL
Zero Capillary
Pressure
Swirr
0.0
Mars 2010
Hydrocarbon Zone
Water Zone
Water Zone
Sw
Swirr
1.0
0.0
Sw
1.0
IAP-Boumerdes
Irregular
Threshold height effects
Poor depth control (deviated wells)
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
types de Log
Date de lopration
Service compagnie (Logging Contractor)
Proprits de boue utiliser durant lenregistrement
Donnes de temprature de fond
Source data files (contractors final/field files, LAS, LIS or DLIS formats)
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
150
1 .8 5
D T
U S /F
D S R H O B 2
G /C 3
50
D E P TH
M
2 .8 5
150
1 .8 5
D T
U S /F
R H O B 2
G /C 3
50
2 .8 5
850
IAP-Boumerdes
Corrections exiger pour toutes les logs pour liminer leffet des condition des puits
Rayon de puits- un grand rayon donne des rsultats loin de parois de puits et relativement augmente la
contribution du proprits de boue dans les enregistrements.
Proprits de Boue spcifique proprits de la boue (e.g. densit, salinit, radioactivit, rsistivit)
Invasion dplacement de fluide de formation par la boue , change les proprits de la formation proche
du fond.
N.B. pas de corrections valable pour :
Sonic Log
Induction logs pour un systme OBM.
Quelque correction sont faite durant le temps dacquisition. Elle doit tre reporter sur lr Log
headers.
E.G. Corrections du rayon de puit et la salinit du boue sont souvent appliquer au neutron porosits
Log
Corrections
Gamma Ray
Density
Neutron
Deep/shallow resistivity
Micro-resistivity
SP
Bed thickness
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Environmental corrections
under Calculations options
Schlumberger
Baker Atlas
Halliburton
Anadrill
Baker Hughes Inteq
Sperry Sun
Weatherford/Reeves
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Vrification de Calibrage
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
60
URAN
POTA 0 PPM 20 6
CALI
IN
BS
IN
0
0
THOR 6
URAN 0
2.95 140
16
-0.75
DRHO
G/CC
0.25
16
0.45
NPHI
v/v
-0.15
PEF
B/E
20
GR
DT
US/F
54
40
Mean = 71.491
Standard Deviation = 6.547
Median = 68.746
Mode = 68.294
Variance = 42.863
48
42
36
50
30
24
18
5850
5900
5950
12
Halite
6
0
100
95
90
85
80
75
DT
70
65
60
55
50
WELL: AAK-5
ZONE: 5822.000 - 6022.000 (FT)
10 Feb 2003 @ 21:50
6000
6050
6100
20
100
18
6150
6250
6300
6350
Mean = 2.084
Standard Deviation = 0.122
Median = 2.037
Mode = 2.027
Variance = 0.015
14
12
50
10
8
16
6200
Percentage
1.95
RHOB
G/CC
150
DEPTH
FT
Cumulative Frequency
GR
GAPI
Percentage
POTA
THOR
0
% 0.1 0 PPM 20 0
6
4
2
6400
6450
6500
Mars 2010
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25
RHOB
2.3
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
WELL: AAK-5
ZONE: 5822.000 - 6022.000 (FT)
10 Feb 2003 @ 21:52
IAP-Boumerdes
If only one calibration reference check is available (casing signal, single evaporite
mineral) then a simple bulk shift to the data values can be applied. The corrected data
should then reflect the appropriate expected value for the calibration reference.
LNorm L CCorr
Where:
LNorm
= Normalised log response
L = Measured log response
CCorr
= Calibration correction
Ideally two calibration references should be identified reflecting low and high values
within the general data ranges. A two point calibration adjustment can be applied such
that the corrected data reflects the appropriate expected values at both calibration
references.
LCP 2 LCP1
LNorm L LP 2 *
LCP 2
LP 2 LP1
Where:
LCP1
= Required log response at calibration point-1 (CP1)
LP1
= Measured log response at CP1
LCP2
= Required log response at calibration point-2 (CP2)
LP2
= Measured log response at CP2
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Limitations de correction
Utilise autres logs tel que le courbe de correction du caliper et densit pour
connatre le potentiel des donnes.
Set flag curve to zero where log is reliable and -1 where log unreliable.
Use flag curve later to merge in results from other log sources where preferred log
is considered unreliable.
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Objectives
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Block shifts assumes high integrity in core and log depth registration
Variable shifting recognises limitations and inaccuracies in core and/or log depth registration
Procedures
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ensure well file is setup with a depth increment fine enough to accommodate the core data (required in IP)
Depth match from top of core downwards
Do not use interpolate/extrapolate options in depth shifting, this changes the values, core values are to
preserved exactly in the depth shifting process
Where possible depth match blocks of core using breaks in core data to define block boundaries
If a an acceptable match cannot be achieved with block shifts, use variable shifts. Ideally make more
frequent numbers of smaller variable shifts rather than one large variable shift
Tips:
If available use core gamma ray to provide an indication of the direction and magnitude of core shifts
Do detailed depth matching based on overlays of core porosity and log density (or other porosity sensitive
log, such as sonic)
Create a continuous core porosity log by interpolating porosities across gaps between core plugs (IP has a
Fill Gap facility for doing this, however limit the interval across which gaps are filled to approximately 1m.
This ensures genuine gaps in core coverage are identifiable and can be used to define core blocks)
Overlay data on compatible scales such that core porosities should lie close to log curve
E.G. If density log is scaled 1.95 to 2.95 g/cc (standard scaling), plot core porosities on scale of 42 to -18%
if reservoir is a sandstone. Use 45 to -15% if reservoir is limestone
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes
Evaluation stages
KEY EVALUATION STAGES
OPTIONS USED IN IP
1.
DATA LOADING
a. Wireline Log Data
b. Routine core analysis data
c. Subsea depth reference
1.
Input/Output
a. Load data LAS Load
b. Load data ASCII Load
c. Calculation
User Formula (vertical well)
True Vertical Depth (deviated well)
2.
DATA QC CORRECTIONS
a. Depth matching
b. Identifying valid data intervals
c. Environmental Corrections
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
Interpretation
a. Clay Volume
b. Porosity & Water Saturation
c. Cut off and Summation
5.
PRESENTING RESULTS
5.
View - Logplot
Mars 2010
IAP-Boumerdes