Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2012
7.1)
4000 2000(1 i)5
1
i 2 5 1 0.1486 14.86% Ans.
7.2)
650, 000 450, 000(1 i )6
1
650, 000 6
i 1 0.0632 6.32% Ans.
450, 000
7.3)
2800 1200( F / P, i %,5) 800( F / P, i%,3) 1200(1 i)5 800(1 i)3
Let , 1 i x, now
3
3x 2 2 x 7 0
x 1.23 1 i
3
1
i 1.23 3 1 0.0714 7.14% Ans.
7.4)
PW 23000 1540( P / A, i %, 60) 0
U sin g i 10%,We get
PW 23000 1540 9.9672 $7, 650.51
U sin g i 12%,We get
PW 23000 1540 8.3240 $10,181.04
U sin g int erpolation,
i 3.95% per month
Effective int erest rate per year (1 0.0395)12 1 59.16% Ans.
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.5)
$900 $37.5(P / A,4.5%,8) F(P / F,4.5%,8)
0.7032F $652.6538
F $928.12
7.6)
P $10M
$10, 000, 000 F ( P / F ,54%,5)
$86, 617, 093
7.8)
PW 550, 000 135, 000(1 i ) 1 152, 000(1 i ) 2 285, 000(1 i ) 3 0
At i 10%
PW $8758.17
At i 15%
PW $130282.73
U sin g int erpolation, i 9.63% Ans.
7.9)
7.10)
7.11)
2
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
(c)
Project A:
(d) The answer could be project C on the grounds that its cash flow represents a loan
not an investment.
7.12)
7.13)
3
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.14)
Use Excel or Cash Flow Analyzer to find the rate of return:
7.15)
(b)
$250 $60 / (1 i) $970 / (1 i)2 0
60 602 4(970)(250)
X
2(970)
4
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
i*1 109.34%
(c) Find i* by plotting the NPW as a function of interest rate:
Number
Project of i*
A 109.34%
B 20.33%
C -0.657%
D 8.229%
E 18.092%
(b)
o Project A: i* 1.913%
o Project B: i* 14.41%
o Project C: i* 7.71%
o Project D: i* 49.9%
(c) Use the PW plot command provided in Cash Flow Analyzer, or you may use the
Excels Chart Wizard.
7.17)
(a)
$20,000 ($9,500 $3,400)( P / A, i,8) 0
Solving for i yields i* 25.56%
7.18)
5
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.19)
7.20)
(a) Since i* 10% and PW(10%) 0 , we have
7.21)
A $2, 068,546
A / 50 $41,371 per unit
7.22)
A $8, 464.56
7.23)
6
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
C $308, 760.56
7.24)
PW (15%) $100,000 $(C 25, 455)( P / A,15%,8)
0
4.4873C $214, 224.22
C $47,740.12
7.25)
Net cash flow (unit: million $):
Net
n Land Bldg. Equip. Revenue Expenses Cash Flow
0 -$1.5 -$3 -$4.50000
1 -$4 -$4.00000
2 $3.50000 -$1.4000 $2.10000
3 $3.67500 -$1.4700 $2.20500
4 $3.85875 -$1.5435 $2.31525
5 $4.05169 -$1.6207 $2.43101
7
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.26)
(a)
PW(i) $20 $8( P / F , i,1) $17( P / F , i, 2) $19( P / F , i,3)
$18( P / F , i, 4) $10( P / F , i,5) $3( P / F , i, 6)
0
This is a simple investment. Therefore, IRR i* 60.52%. Since IRR 18%, the
project is a acceptable.
7.27)
(a)
(b)
$1,500 $3,750 / (1 i) $2,310 / (1 i )2 0
8
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.28)
(a) Rate of return calculation:
o Project A: i* 25.66%
o Project B: i* 57.91%
(b)
PW(i%) A $30, 000 $2, 000( P / F , i %,1) $6, 000( P / F , i %, 2)
$28, 000( P / F , i %,5)
PW(i%) B $15, 000 $10, 000( P / A, i %, 4) $5, 000( P / F , i %,5)
PW(i%) A PW(i%) B
i 9.75%
(c)
n Project A Project B A-B
0 -30,000 -15,000 -15,000
1 2,000 10,000 -8,000
2 6,000 10,000 -4,000
3 12,000 10,000 2,000
4 24,000 10,000 12,000
5 28,000 5,000 23,000
9
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.29)
n Project A Project B A-B
0 -3,000 -3,000 0
1 1,500 300 1,200
2 1,200 600 600
3 600 600 0
4 600 1,200 -600
5 300 2,100 -1,800
7.30)
Neither project.Since IRR A-B 7.87% 15% (MARR) , project B is better choice
if there is no do-nothing alternative.
7.31)
10
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
(c)
n Project A Project B A-B
0 -$100,000.00 -$100,000.00 $0.00
1 $10,500.00 $70,000.00 -$59,500.00
2 $60,000.00 $50,000.00 $10,000.00
3 $80,000.00 $20,500.00 $59,500.00
7.32)
7.33)
IRR 1-2 11.8% MARR and IRR 2 18.88% MARR , thus select (c).
7.34)
Determine the cash flow on incremental investment:
11
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.35)
(a) IRR on the incremental investment:
i* A2 A1 29.92%
7.36)
(a)
n A1 A2 A2 A1
0 -$16,000 -$20,000 -$4,000
1 $7,500 $5,000 -$2,500
2 $7,500 $15,000 $7,500
3 $7,500 $8,000 $500
IRR A2 A1 13.08%
7.37)
(a) IRR B 25.99%
(b) PW(15%) A $10,000 $5,500( P / A,15%,3) $2,558
(c) Incremental analysis:
12
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
1 $5,500 0 -$5,500
2 $5,500 0 -$5,500
3 $5,500 $40,000 $34,500
n AB
0 -$2,376
1 $0
2 $0
3 $0
4 $2,500
IRR A B 1.28%
7.39)
Given: IRR for Model A: 10.49%, IRR for Model B: 12.34%;
Incremental cash flows:
n BA
0 -$2,000
1-19 $350
20 $450
IRR B A 16.75%
Model B is a better choice.
7.40) Let A0 current practice, A1 just-in-time system, A2 stock less supply system.
n A0 A1 A1 A0
0 0 -$2,500,000 -$2,500,000
1-8 -$5,000,000 -$2,900,000 $2,100,000
13
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
n A2 A1 A2 A1
0 -$5,000,000 -$2,500,000 -$2,500,000
1-8 -$1,400,000 -$2,900,000 $1,500,000
7.41)
(a)
i1* 85.08%, i2* 57.61%, and i3* 44.30%
(b)
Project 1 versus Project 2:
n Project 2 Project 1
0 -$4,000
1 $7,000
2 -$1,900
Select Project 2.
n Project 2 Project 3
0 -$3,000
1 $6,000
2 -$1,400
This is another non simple incremental investment, so we may use again the PW
decision rule.
PW(15%)23 $1,158
Again, select Project 2.
Comments: If you want to apply the IRR decision rule to the non-simple
investments, you should apply the net investment test and make the selection by
calculating the return on invested capital (or true internal rate of return) as
discussed in Chapter 7A.
14
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
7.42)
7.43)
All projects would be acceptable because individual ROR exceed the MARR.
Based on the incremental analysis, we observe the following relationships:
7.45)
Relationships:
15
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Power Saw
Category Model A Model B Model C
Investment cost $4,000 $6,000 $7,000
Salvage value $400 $600 $700
Annual labor savings $1,296 $1,725 $1,944
Annual power cost $400 $420 $480
Net annual savings $896 $1,305 $1,464
16
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Select Model C. The PW rule also selects Model C, as indicated in the table above.
7.47)
n Current Pump(A) Larger Pump(B) B-A
0 $0 -$1,600,000 -$1,600,000
1 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000
2 $10,000,000 $0 -$10,000,000
*
i = 25%
400%
The incremental cash flows result in multiple rates of return (25% and 400%), so
we may abandon the rate of return analysis. Using the PW analysis,
Comments: If we follow the procedure outlined in Appendix 7A, we will find the
return on invested capital to be 4.16% at MARR of 20%, so we will reject the
larger pump.
7.48)
With the least common multiple of 6 project years,
17
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
Comments: Even though the incremental flow is a nonsimple, it has a unique rate
of return. As shown in Chapter 7A, this incremental cash flow will pass the net
investment test, indicating that the incremental cash flow is a pure investment.
7.49) Assumptions are required that required service period is indefinite and both
projects can be repeated at the same cost in the future.
7.50)
(a) Since there is not much information given regarding the future replacement
options and required service period, we may assume that the required service
period is indefinite and both projects can be repeated at the same cost in the future.
(b) The analysis period may be chosen as the least common multiple of project lives,
which is 3 years.
n A2 A1
18
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
0 -$5,000
1 $0
2 $0
3 $15,000
IRR A2 A1 44.22%
The MARR must be greater than 44.22% for Project A1 to be preferred.
7.51)
(a)
(c) IRR exceeds Marcos MARR, the project is attractive and should be accepted.
7.52)
(a) Analysis period of 40 years (unit: thousand $):
For a 40-year analysis period, the drop of IRR with the mothballing cost is only
0.18%, which is relatively insignificant.
19
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
For a 25-year analysis period, the drop of IRR with the mothballing cost is
about 1.04%, which is relatively significant.
7.53) Lets assume that your college expenses for four years would be $120,000
($30,000 per year) and you only consider about your future asset in 30years. Then, you
can think about the cash flows in both cases.
20
Fundamentals of Engineering Economics, 3rd ed. 2012
IRR B A 10.06%
In this example, if MARR is larger than 10.06%, then your college degree is rather an
expensive proposition in economic terms.
21